TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

foot_kisser Archive

View 1 posts and 377 comments by foot_kisser on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
63

Activism/Supportfoot_kisser/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him. The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”- Jordan Peterson on why some fucking psychopath killed women. This is perfectly correct. If you have a system where monogamy is not "enforced", at least in the sense of being more socially approved, what happens is certain highly successful men either accumulate harems or sleep around a lot, preventing men on the bottom from having a shot at mating opportunities, …
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:02 AM
1

“Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever.” --Baron Munchausen
/r/MensRights24/08/20 11:12 PM
17

There are just so many posts where men are playing the victim I don't think there are, but if there were, I don't see how that would be a problem. If we can't say that men are victims of something in a Men's Rights subreddit, where can we say that? the post about calling the police because women were topless at the beach and OP thought he might be called a perv for gazing over is just concerning. That's half of that story; the other half is that some boys were arrested for skinny dipping at nigh…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 04:51 AM
5

Bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:09 PM
4

She literally spends the whole video sympathising with the Men’s Rights movement and explaining why. The very first thing she says about the MRM is that in her experience, it's all about jumping on people for saying anything about women to try to invalidate them. Her conclusion is that the MRM is basically a backlash to feminism at best, and at worst straight-up misogyny. She then makes fun of and mischaracterizes /r/MensRights, this subreddit that you posted this on. EDIT: I found the comment I…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 01:53 PM
2

I remember this old video. It's basically an anti-Men's Rights propaganda piece. Not worth watching.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:33 AM
6

What about most feminists like me? Depends on what "feminists like me" are. If you're here to troll us and put us down, there's no point in even attempting to work with you. If you're interested in helping, like Christina Hoff Sommers or Camille Paglia, then by all means go ahead. People who help, whether they label themselves MRAs or feminists or anything else, we like. it actually seems like some of you think that all women have a hive mind intent on using men and putting them down. You defini…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:58 AM
7

The point of your post was to push a false equivalence between MRAs and feminists, and to pretend that MRAs engage in the same set of destructive behaviors that extreme feminists do. This guy caught the point of your post, and rebutted it. That's not the same as missing the point.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:09 AM
8

I was hoping this would actually be productive and not stereotype and generalize half the population. This sub is productive and doesn't stereotype anyone.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:07 AM
2

paul Elam There are two reasons to dislike Paul. Either you're the kind that is oversensitive, and you don't like it when people are pottymouths or politically incorrect, or else you hate men and therefore hate anyone trying to help men. Are mrm trying to remove womens rights? Nope. What has the mrm done to affect policy? Raise awareness of the issues, because many people aren't aware of the existence of this kind of problem. We've had some lawsuits over various things, including one over the ma…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:28 AM
12

You say you don't provide any benefit to society, but you pay your bills, and you pay your mom's bills. That's a benefit to society. And if you get the money to pay them from a job, that job is also a benefit to society. You say your doctor appreciating your weight loss is like your mom appreciating your attractiveness, but that's not really a fair comparison. Your doctor isn't going to appreciate your weight loss without an actual weight loss. These two things are good things about you. Sometim…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 09:29 AM
1

If you're calling it a "financial abortion", the rage probably comes from the word abortion. I can't tell you what the pro choice emotional reaction would be, but the pro life reaction would be disgust at the idea of promoting something as good while using a word that means "vicious murder of innocent babies". If you stop using the word "abortion", which is one of the most emotionally charged words in the English language and really has nothing to do with financial opting-out of fathers, they mi…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:23 PM
7

Sorry to hear it.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:48 AM
-1

Look around We have. That's how we know you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:45 AM
1

You're being unreasonable by claiming that something exists when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 07:53 PM
-1

We don't need your uninformed opinion, concern troll.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 07:33 PM
-7

He's just a religious loon posting his nonsense where it doesn't belong. And you're just an irreligious loon posting your nonsense where it doesn't belong. He wasn't even TRYING to be on topic. You're describing yourself. Imagine if I just...out of the blue, to some random comment here...posted a debunk of....Islam. Totally out of line. Change "Islam" to "religion", and that's exactly what you did.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 07:27 PM
1

This is a men's rights forum, not a religion forum or an irreligion forum. If you seriously can't handle religious people believing that men have rights, maybe you should go away.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:58 PM
-1

I falsified your religion LOL But think about this for a second: why are you trying to "falsify" religion on a men's rights forum? I am not crusading You made an argument against religion generally which you claim "falsified" religion generally. What does that have to do with men's rights? I put a user who was out of line in his place. By being even more out of line, and simultaneously a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:52 PM
-5

factual correction LOL CALAMITYFOX up there posted his religious nonsense in this forum where it has no place and I put him back in his place. And yet you're complaining when I do the same thing to you using your own words. If this is not the place for his religious speculations, then it is equally not the place for your atheist evangelistic crusade. And if your atheist evangelistic crusade is appropriate here, then so are his religious speculations.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:34 PM
-7

Take your silly anti-religious crusade elsewhere. This is a men's rights forum, not an atheist soapbox.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:05 PM
7

I have a issue with referring to someone as a "retarded 16 year old commie". That's fine that you don't agree Don't presume my opinion on things I didn't state an opinion on. I didn't say "it's fine to call someone a retarded commie". I said "calling someone a retarded commie because of the ridiculous way they're acting is not woman bashing". makes you like like reactionary "Reactionary" doesn't mean anything. and resorting to childish insults instantly makes me not take you seriously That's not…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 01:43 AM
21

Why are we upvoting people in the comments calling Greta Thunberg a “retarded 16yo commie”? Greta is a woman, but people making fun of her are not making fun of her for being a woman. They're making fun of her for being ridiculous. And then on top of that upvoting people calling climate change a hoax? Climate change is not a woman. pure women hate Neither of your two examples were woman hate. The things you claim are happening that you pretend to be concerned about are not happening. Your concer…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:29 PM
10

TRP: An obnoxious subreddit that we don't have anything to do with. MGTOW: A separate group that we don't necessarily have a problem with, but aren't strongly connected to, either. In my own opinion, some MGTOW go too far and succumb to the temptation to excessively generalize about women negatively.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:20 AM
12

Most of the men and women on this sub are against feminism, because feminism is against men and men's rights advocates. Feminism doesn't denied men's issues. It consistently has. And when that doesn't work, they switch to denying MRAs the right to address men's issues in the way we want to.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:15 AM
1

I'm referencing a different subreddit because it has similar values Then name the sub. The post you claimed existed on it would not pass muster with MRAs. I think the reason you're reluctant to name the sub is that if you did, it would be obvious you're trying to conflate us with someone else.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:59 AM
3

"Users of mensrights have been identified as not aligning with our values as a community that supports maximum female benefit." Translation: "You guys disagree with our opinion that men are punching bags for abuse. How dare you stand up for yourselves!"
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:26 AM
13

Can you say "I am an MRA and a Feminist"? Yes. If you do, will MRAs accept you? Yes. If you do, will Feminists accept you? No.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 03:12 AM
1

Always framing the debate around male suicide rates is a bit too strong, at least for general advice to everyone. It's a good framing, but it isn't the only useful one. Memorizing stats that make women look bad has two problems. First, it looks too much like the stereotype of the MRM that feminists try to pass off. Second, gynocentrism runs pretty deep, and I don't think it can be effectively countered with statistics. The disclaimer about not making it your primary form of activism is a step in…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 12:46 AM
3

It got decent engagement. It says that we ought to "Always frame the debate around male suicide rates" and "Memorize stats that make women look bad". Both are bad advice, but the other 4 points were good. Your post got 49 upvotes and 24 comments. One of the current sticky posts has 37 upvotes and 3 comments.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:21 PM
8

Triggered much? ... Go untwist your panties somewhere else. For someone who's complaining about too much drama, you sure are being dramatic.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:08 PM
2

This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:23 AM
1

You actually made two mistakes here. First, you accused her of dishonesty. There is no reason to assume she had any clue that her definition of feminism did not match reality. If you had avoided accusing her of something, and had instead tried to demonstrate the mismatch between her idea of feminism and the reality of feminism, it's possible you might have persuaded her. Second, you demanded that she retweet something you provided her. The demand probably didn't go over well with her. It's also …
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:51 AM
11

This article may well be the single most delusional thing I've ever read. So utterly detached from reality, so utterly focused on the author's own personal emotions, so utterly worried about details of word choice when it doesn't affect the meaning. And it's in response to a deeply sane and perfectly reasonable email from Richard Stallman. In response to his well thought out, reasonable, and polite email, she says she is "writing this because I'm too angry to work". The email wasn't even sent to…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:18 PM
4

Bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:48 AM
17

She only acknowledges a few men's issues, and dismisses the MRM without reason. This is basically the same move menslib makes: "If we acknowledge that some of your issues exist, will you please stop trying to solve them?"
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:03 PM
4

There's nothing destructive about the post you mentioned or about the movement in general. It's really weird that you claim that post is somehow supposed to be about "invoking rage towards women". How is a story about a double standard going to randomly inspire rage towards women? And if we did have any "rage" against women, why would we have so many prominent and admired female members?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:03 PM
2

The vast majority of feminist leaders already oppose the MRM because we try to solve men's issues. What you're predicting wouldn't happen already is. If you're trying to suggest that the only problem we should be permitted to solve is a lack of role models, I have to disagree. We have tons of other things to tackle as well.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:46 PM
2

The vast majority of feminists aren't a problem, because most of them hear the dictionary definition of it and agree with the idea of fairness. The majority of those that run their organizations, though, oppose men and the MRM.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:24 PM
2

The MRM isn't and never has been about feminism or women. It is about solving the problems men have. There is no reason feminism should oppose us, but since they do, they have made themselves part of the problem.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:08 PM
1

I watched it. Did you?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:47 PM
1

She doesn't recognize the problems. She recognizes some of the problems. And she blows off the people working on solving them. I don't know why you're talking about her being formerly angry, right wing, or a man, as none of those things are relevant.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:45 PM
7

She claimed that men's problems are not systemic and that they're a result of being so privileged we don't have problems. She also claimed that the MRM's solutions don't work without even looking at them. I don't see anything at all wrong with my summary.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 08:12 PM
1

Her conclusion was essentially, "Men have issues, although they aren't that serious, and men need to solve those problems. But don't try to solve the problems by trying to solve the problems the way MRAs do, try to make up a new positive masculinity or something. Or maybe buttseks, LOL."
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:33 PM
14

specifically her Incels video Odd that you'd recommend that. We aren't incels here, and we don't resemble them. If you're interested in an MRA take on incels, this is a pretty good one.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:39 AM
30

She basically acknowledges that problems exist while being stereotypically dismissive of the MRM. Her stereotypical dismissal is less overt than many left-wing stereotypical dismissals, but she nevertheless does dismiss us with untrue stereotypes. This looks less like a positive move on her part that might result in some good, and more like an attempt to stem the tide of growth of the MRM. It might result in a few generic male feminist orbiters becoming menslib feminist orbiters, but that's not …
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:25 AM
1

They all saw through feminist ideology. That's something they all have in common with reality, not with each other.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 08:08 PM
7

"The manosphere" is just a convenient way for feminists to lump all men on the internet together, as if any of these very separate and distinct groups had anything to do with one another.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:49 PM
4

This isn't relevant to Men's Rights. Findom is short for Financial Domination. It's a kink where they guy wants the girl to charge him money for the privilege of being insulted and demeaned by a pretty girl. He gets off on it. This isn't a realistic assessment of penises, or the real opinion of findom types. It's part of a game they're playing. It might be a Men's Rights issue if it were the case that lots of men who can't afford it were paying too much for this sort of thing, but if so the answ…
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:48 PM
30

What do you mean by "pro red pill"? If you mean the subreddit by that name, then no. If you mean the excellent documentary about the MRM by Cassie Jaye, then yes. If you're not talking about that, then please explain what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:54 PM
1

LOL Philip Davies is a sweetheart, not a "bigoted misogynistic hate monster".
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:49 PM
2

Seeing posts like this that suggest I’m trans because my father wasn’t a good man and role model is disheartening and infuriating. That's not even close to what this says. It isn't about trans people at all.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 05:35 PM
1

making some jab at women What jab?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 03:40 PM
0

I'm pretty sure he's also a white nationalist The guy the white nationalists denounce and who denounces white nationalists is somehow one of them. Sure. And Bernie Sanders is a Republican. who can't fathom the idea that there are marginalized groups of people in society This must be why he keeps talking about people being marginalized and how that's a problem.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 10:10 PM
9

You seem to be under the delusion that the purpose of a boycott is to hurt people. It's not. It's to object to the behavior of a corporation, so that that corporation and other competing corporations will understand that the behavior is not appreciated by their customers.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:36 PM
1

I realize that a lot of guys on here are probably right-leaning or center-right, but can we cut the shit? How about we cut out the concern trolling meant to smear unrelated political opinions.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 02:24 AM
38

This isn't as hypocritical as it appears at first glance. They assume that superior means morally better, and they assume that it is morally better to be powerless and nonthreatening. In other words "because we are weak, we are morally better, and because we are morally better, we are superior". They confuse weakness with goodness.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 10:14 PM
1

What makes you think he meant it literally?
/r/MensRights10/03/19 11:35 PM
1

Claiming an ideology is a mental illness makes no sense in and out of itself. It's not a literal claim. It's a hyperbolic claim. _someone very narrow minded (won't even try to understand feminism, just call it mental illness as a whole). The hyperbolic claim is based on an understanding of feminism. I don't know the guy who made the original hyperbolic claim, but I've looked into feminism and I could tell you a fair amount about it. The hyperbole fits. _someone very intolerant (can't accept othe…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 08:22 PM
2

CAFE has a video on their channel where Professor Donald Dutton gave the Canadian Senate a presentation on domestic violence. The video references a number of studies, many of which can be found on the internet. The video is about an hour and a half long. This is a good source for evidence that men are victims of domestic violence at approximately the same rate as women. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has a page on fatal occupational injuries. They have a lot of data covering multiple years…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:38 PM
7

Your argument here was extremely unpersuasive. There are two reasons for this. First, you failed to construct an argument. Second, nearly everything you said was a nasty slur against someone or something. "Some shithead", "the moral cesspit of Alabama", "some idiot", "this is degenerate", "A smack for those shitheads". If there is some real argument against this lawsuit, I'd be interested to find out what it actually is.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:22 PM
-1

I remember that nonsense just fine. It's still nonsense. Oh, no, the COO held the same opinion in 2012 that Obama held in 2008! How terrible! Oh, no, the charitable organization run by the CEO donated to political causes you disapprove of! And then, after public disapproval, they decided to stop doing that! The Horror! If I can find evidence that the CEO of McDonalds donated to a political cause I don't like, do I get to call them hateburgerland?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:26 PM
8

Why wouldn't he be serious?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:09 PM
2

Since when did chick-fil-a believe in equality? Since always. homophobic chicken Don't be ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:34 PM
1

His data don't lead to his conclusion. He might as well have said that toxic masculinity, or gynocentrism, or the secret government pact with aliens is to blame for it. They all have just as much connection with his data.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:08 PM
0

Are you seriously trying to tell me that all rapes are the same? Why would you think that it's "fucking awful" to compare severities?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:48 PM
12

All organized feminist groups would be against it. MRAs don't care what label you put on yourself, we care what you do and say. Christina Hoff Sommers doesn't call herself an MRA, and does call herself a feminist. She agrees with us on many issues, and we're fine with her. Feminists generally aren't. I don't know if anyone has adopted both labels, but if someone did, we'd be fine with them and feminists wouldn't.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:44 AM
1

You were obviously in the right on the facts here, but the way you responded could have been better from the point of view of persuasion. They were trying to paint you as someone who was trying to "prove how horrible women are". Your response focused on cherry picking instead, and then you called the guy "a pitiful, sexist piece of shit". It would be very easy for a bystander to see that and assume that you were the real sexist, because you didn't defend yourself against the accusation that your…
/r/MensRights06/03/19 11:11 PM
4

I think "alpha males" don't literally exist in humans. When people say "alpha males", they aren't meaning it literally as much as figuratively, though, and some men are more dominant and agressive. It's really weird that BDSM people would get offended at a word. Especially a word that means "dominant and agressive". You'd expect that, at most, they'd dislike playing with that particular offensive word personally, but be non-judgmental towards people who do.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:54 PM
1

That's not a good idea even if your only goal were to help women and you didn't care about men at all.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 09:28 PM
12

And no, this is not a ''concern troll'' or a ''shill'' or whatever stupid term that some people here want to shout at everyone who they don't agree with. This is a concern troll. We get them all the time. Bombastic claims that "this sub used to be nice, but now it is misogynistic" and "misogyny is upvoted here". No it isn't. If it were, you'd point to examples. But you don't have any to point to. r/theredpill and r/braincels are quarantined, and they are getting way less traffic the last time I …
/r/MensRights04/11/18 04:00 PM
4

Anybody who started whining about the "Jewish Question" or "white genocide" around here would get downvoted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 03:37 PM
4

Wrong, people like you are the reason this sub has an alt right reputation. Feminist lies would be the reason. Non-feminists don't have an ideological reason to lie about us, and there is no resemblance or connection to the actual alt-right.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:42 PM
1

I don't know much about any of these, but of these options, given what you've said here, it seems to me diaspora would be the best. Jabber is IM and chat, so while no doubt useful, it isn't something that could be considered a drop in replacement for reddit, which is more post/forum/comment style. Tor would require a dedicated server, so diaspora would be more lightweight. The major disadvantage of diaspora would be other pods/servers not allowing us to use them as an entry point, which could be…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:11 PM
3

kavanaugh is clearly a huge liar on numerous topics. Don't be silly.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 06:55 PM
23

She says she was pushed into a room, the door was locked behind her, she was pushed onto a bed, things happened, then she got free of them. At this point, she was scared, the bedroom represented fear, and the bathroom across the hall represented safety. She does not describe how she solved the problem of the locked door between fear and safety. Then she says she left the party, and doesn't remember how she got home. She doesn't remember the exact location, but the distance from her home to the a…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:44 PM
7

If you knew anything about the documentary, you'd know that it has nothing to do with the subreddit with the same name, other than the coincidence of naming. I know the documentary is not exclusively about hating women Don't be dishonest. There is clearly no woman hating in it.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:32 PM
8

They’re trying to turn a women’s rights movement into a retrograde battle of the sexes. Too late. Feminists already accomplished this decades ago.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:11 PM
2

In other words - people accused of rape, whether that accusation be true or false - must necessarily deny the rape occurred. That's not necessarily true. It is probably typically true, but that's not the same thing. So, by necessity, there are more untrue claims that a rape is a "false accusation" than there are true claims that a rape is a "false accusation," because rapes are, in fact, underreported. This doesn't follow. False rape accusations are not a subset of all rapes.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:41 AM
2

Didn't they give exemptions for people going to college? Why wouldn't this be a case of the government giving out a standard exemption?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:46 PM
4

Why not?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:27 AM
-6

credible allegations You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:17 PM
9

a fascist on the supreme court Stop trolling.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:19 AM
2

I think they're biased to the point of not being worth looking at. Let's take a selection from their conclusions: "Men Rights Movement is a Regressive Wolf in a Progressive Sheep clothing." Regressive is a meaningless word, and the MRM is not progressive and doesn't represent itself as such. We don't have a position on the left-right spectrum. We have members on various points on that spectrum, including progressives, but we also have members who are not. "For Tucker Carlson and other ultra cons…
/r/MensRights23/09/18 07:43 AM
1

It's real. Democrats are apparently trying to spin this as "callousness".
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:25 AM
6

“You can see that I’m a little upset by this, the unfairness of it,” Hirono said. Self-awareness level = 0.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:37 PM
2

teacher who performed oral sex on 14-year-old The word you're looking for is "rape".
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:47 PM
2

"Pure research" doesn't exist. Don't be silly.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:30 PM
2

I don't see, at least in this article, a clear-minded understanding of what good it is meant to do to offset that harm. Pure research advances our understanding of the world, and that is good. Also, the harm you're supposing is hypothetical. What about the harm that could result from the suppression of the research? What about the people who might start listening to the alt-right white nationalists, because at least they aren't afraid to discuss the issue?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:15 PM
1

How is a "what if" relevant to a decision that he actually made in real life? What if scenarios play a role in every decision we make. If the thought "what if I jump off this bridge" runs through your mind, you won't try it to see what happens, you'll think about what would have happened and realize that's a bad outcome, and then make a decision based on the what if scenario. Idk how I can be any more clear about the question. You keep asking the same question in exactly the same words, and expe…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:18 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:16 AM
1

His immigration status is relevant, since he's an illegal alien, and therefore should not have been here in the first place. If he had not been here in the first place, as the law requires, the young lady he killed would still be alive.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:12 AM
1

Why wouldn't it be important? I'm not seeing where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:06 AM
1

I'm arguing in good faith; you are defending a personal bias. Right back at you. We can play the game of "Me good, you bad!" "No! Me good, you bad!" if you want. All you got is "Not true." Not true. :) I got sources you could have found quite easily if you simpyl bothered to google them. I don't bother to do other people's research when having arguments with random strangers on the internet. I'll do my own research to justify positions I hold, and I'll look at the stuff other people link me to, …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:05 AM
2

You said, and I quote, "Many people on the right are just against all immigration." That is a false statement. The fact that there are differences of opinion within the right doesn't change that. The fact that tiny fringe groups exist doesn't change that.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:18 PM
2

I said some are, not all. You used the word "many", and that's false. Even with the word "some", it's only technically true, because you can find a tiny fringe group, and technically, "some" means "any at all". You're trying to misrepresent us by pretending a tiny fringe group we don't like somehow represents us.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:14 PM
2

That's not true. I am on the right, and I listen to people on the right, and we are not against all immigration.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:46 PM
1

The Trump admin is de-naturalizing people, changing immgration laws that impact people who already have PR, Citation needed. and the mouth peices like Laura Ingram are complaining about demographic changes that the American people 'didn't vote for' meaning... immigrants (legal or otherwise) that are adding 'color' to communities. You're assuming her meaning for the purposes of supporting your political rhetoric. Why do you think she cares about color? Can you give a reason why she wouldn't be in…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:45 PM
62

Right: Let's blame immigrants. That's not an accurate representation of the right's position. We're blaming uncontrolled illegal immigration. And the perpetrator individually, of course, but this situation is a symptom of a systematic problem with enforcement of our immigration laws. Saying it's "immigrants" is ignoring the rather important distinction between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants don't have anything to do with it at all, and even many illegal immigrants haven't contrib…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:19 AM
11

Karen Straughan, aka girlwriteswhat. Men Are Good, Tom Golden's channel. Bane666au. He tends to do very long videos, sometimes in the form of a series of videos, each of which is long. Studio Brule is Steve Brule's channel, but also features Janice Fiamengo a lot. CAFE has a channel, usually featuring videos of speeches, sometimes by MRAs and sometimes by researchers. Bettina Arndt, from Australia. The Prim Reaper. Cassie Jaye, who made The Red Pill documentary, also posted a long series of inte…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 09:41 PM
3

This post is not about Men's Rights, it's incel crap. Your bullshit site has a "Hall of Heroes", celebrating mass murderers. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:33 AM
1

Again, I see a lot more online rage than meaningful action. That's a lot different from your original claim of "zero interest" and "shrilly scream that every woman on earth is an evil creature". Where do you see this "online rage"? What meaningful actions do you think MRAs are not taking that we have the power to take now?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:48 AM
1

That's not true.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:34 PM
1

Given how feminists often treat men, especially MRAs, it's not clear that's not just plain honesty.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:59 AM
2

And I don't find it super useful to go into detail with someone who isn't listening to what I'm actually saying. I'm sorry I took your OP seriously, hoping that maybe you'd return the favor. My mistake.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:34 AM
2

But god forbid I pay a fucking complement. You think it was a compliment to condescendingly pretend that I was the only good one, in a snide and sarcastic way, then to deny that anyone on my side is good at all? If you honestly think that you gave me a compliment, you don't understand what a compliment is.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:28 PM
2

Oh, for fuck's sake, you're not "the one good one," your opinions are mostly stupid they're at least just more consi... Oh, for fuck's sake yourself. You're the one who hasn't bothered to justify your own opinions. I gave you plenty of answers, and you haven't addressed one of them. But of course you didn't. You don't have any counterarguments, so how could you address even one thing I said?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:21 PM
2

So I'm "the one good one", even though people agree with me? Even though others are making many of the same points I did? We hold exactly the pro-male view that I've set out and that others have set out. Your inability to give us a fair shake doesn't change that.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:12 PM
2

Oh, come on. You openly declared yourself to be exactly that in the very first sentence in your OP. You don't get to openly declare yourself to be something and then deny it.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:03 PM
12

If all you do is shit on feminism, Think about what you're doing right now. All you're doing with this troll post is shitting on MRAs. "Awesome, this #metoo advocate deserves to go down!" Yes, but then that requires us to believe her accuser in spite of this not having been proved beyond all possible doubt and also that people should go down for this sort of behavior No, actually. She deserves to go down for advocating for judgment without evidence. That's what the metoo campaign is about, makin…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:20 AM
8

It's really disappointing that many on MensRights, in response to feminism which they see as leftist and Marxist ideology, have adopted libertarian economics and right-wing views. You've got the chronology backwards. I didn't see feminism on the left and think "I've got to spite feminism, so I'll join the other side". I saw that libertarians and right wingers were correct and joined them, then, later, I saw that Men's Rights Activists were correct and joined them. Why is it always left-wing MRAs…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 09:07 AM
3

I would think the motivation would be obvious. If there's been anyone in this sub who lives in West Virginia and was treated unfairly by CPS and/or the courts, presumably in a custody proceeding or divorce proceeding or something like that, now would be the time to make a formal complaint, if you haven't already. We know courts treat men unfairly, if you've been treated unfairly, expose it.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:15 AM
1

This sounds like a conspiracy theory. Do you have evidence for this?
/r/MensRights16/08/18 06:16 AM
1

That's not correct.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:26 AM
1

Anti MRAs often try and falsely accuse us of being tied to nationalist Is this a typo for "white nationalist"? There's a rather huge difference, as white nationalists want to kick non-white races out of countries they consider to be "white nations", while plain nationalists like their own country and want it to succeed. The MRM doesn't support either one, of course, but worrying about being called plain old nationalists would be silly, as it's not an insult.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:10 AM
4

“#KillAllMen” was another way of saying “it would be nice if the world sucked less for women.” Well, bludgeon all women to death with jigsaw puzzles to you too. By saying that, of course, I don't mean it literally. Obviously I just meant to convey that we've been having nice weather lately, and that I hope you're enjoying it as much as I am.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:46 AM
-1

The female counterpart to this would be a video with a man saying "we need more women who don't try to get jobs or higher education, who's goal is to get married and have plenty of children, and who submit to the husband as the head of the house" That's a rather unfair misrepresentation of the video.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 11:09 PM
15

This person was obviously joking. True. This is especially clear in the third tweet, when she refers to a Unix command line utility called 'killall', and says that it kills all "instances" of men. That one's even kind of funny. But do you think for a moment that if you said "ok, that was funny, now do women" that she actually would? Sure it's a joke, and not meant literally, but it's a sexist joke that reveals her actual sexist opinions. I am a staunch supporter in liberty of expression and beli…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:39 AM
4

Unfortunately they are given ammunition by an influx of far right posters on this sub. What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:42 AM
2

Examples have been given Oh, ok. I thought you'd come here to talk about it with us instead of with her. Sorry, my bad.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 07:23 PM
2

There's evidence against the two assertions she made. Why tell us about it instead of showing her that evidence? Maybe countering both at once would be too much for this conversation, but I'd at least show her an example of a woman violently beating and raping a man, since she asked for one.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 07:18 PM
49

For Netflix, a documentary about people who want to solve the societal problems facing men is bad, but a documentary about a man who said "Hitler was a very great man" is good.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 06:58 PM
58

The study also said men end up worse off, but this is in contrast to the views of divorce experts, who say older women are the ones who are missing out financially. "What are you going to believe? Our narrative, or your lying eyes?" "I live in a $1 million apartment, he lives in a multi-million dollar house," she said. "Won't somebody please think of the millionaires?" Charlie Viola, a wealth manager who works with divorced clients, said he also found women to be worse off. That is because women…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:07 AM
6

War: yes, men are the ones forced to go to war in the past and experience horrible things and die by the millions. It's unfair, I agree. Other perspective: men are also the ones right now in modernity who are the strongest advocates against women being allowed to fight. You're contrasting experiencing horrible things and dying by the millions to it being said that you shouldn't be allowed to experience horrible things and die. One is being thrown away like a used tissue because you're not valued…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 08:20 AM
1

Robinson is in jail for double contempt of court That's certainly how the people who put him away would spin it. And who the fuck is Count Dankula? Look him up if you want. You were the one asking for what this guy's sources might be, and I told you what I thought he might be referring to.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 11:00 PM
1

Elam claims that the UK now imprisons people for Telling Jokes and Practicing Journalism? That Bold Assertion needs sources,..... He's probably referring to Count Dankula and Tommy Robinson.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 10:03 PM
1

I'm in the U.S., and it's working for me.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 09:54 PM
1

The bragging isn't the point. That there is something to brag about is. The more we can do with high-tech, long-range weapons, the less of a potential need there is likely to be for large numbers of ground troops. Small numbers of ground troops don't require a draft to obtain. The fact that in the nuclear era, large-scale wars like WWII have been replaced with proxy wars also has an effect on the likelihood of a need for large numbers of troops. They also brag about the fact that they have an al…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:32 PM
1

You don't have to twist what I've said or what anyone else has said. We haven't said, or insisted, that the draft isn't coming back. We've said, and it's true, that it isn't likely to come back.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:32 AM
0

Nobody said it proved anything. Sheesh yourself.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:18 AM
0

By the way, the idea you promote is ludicrous. It sounds like a child’s idea of the military: I've served in the military. It is not a child's idea of the military. Our military brags about its high-tech weapons and its all-volunteer personnel. That war only ended in ‘71 and there are TONS of vets alive today. Try telling them a draft is unlikely. The draft ended in 1973, and we've had an all-volunteer force from then until now, meaning that the draft hasn't been in effect for 45 years. Sure, th…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:55 AM
4

You're right, of course. I apologize to packet, whose pronouns are packet/address/network. I hope I did not hurt network's feelings by not addressing address as packet. Checking privilege. check privilege Welcome to Privilege Check 2.3! Error: privilege to check not specified Usage: check privilege <category> check privilege male Welcome to Privilege Check 2.3! Status of Male Privilege: Nonexistent Privilege Check complete, have a nice day!
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:30 PM
43

Individual? How dare you misgender him! TCP/IP doesn't identify as an individual, he identifies as a protocol.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 08:28 AM
1

This question of inceldom ... That's what makes me very worried. And that's why I'm pissed off at comments such as the one that foot_kisser made in this thread. What does my comment have to do with incels?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:04 AM
3

That's a hell of a hostile response to a question.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:36 AM
2

Well, in addition to "Nobody owes you sex", I'd also say "Nobody owes you free food".
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:25 PM
2

"Nobody owes you sex" is a fine phrase. It's true. So what's your problem with it? It can't be the phrase itself, so is it something about how it's used?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:53 PM
15

Richard Poplak accurately portrayed that Peterson thinks, “the world is a hard zero-summy type of place, with alphas and betas and gammas all vying for the same hot chicks.” And it’s the same kind of bullshit you’ll see spewed time and again from the men’s rights crowd, which is why MRAs love Jordan Peterson. This was probably the worst piece of made-up bullshit in this story. Not that there wasn't some pretty stiff competition... Peterson wouldn't use the word "chick", I've seen him say that th…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:44 PM
19

Ah. That does work as an explanation.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:09 AM
204

I don't think that works as an explanation. 1500+ reviews down to 7? My review was one of the ones that was wiped, and I didn't get any discount.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:46 AM
34

I resubmitted a review I'd initially made a year ago, and after a few minutes, it went through. When it did, it went through with the original date, rather than today's date. When I went to write the review, the original text for the review I had originally written showed up so I just resubmitted it unchanged. Currently there are 10 reviews, 2 from 2017, and the rest 24 or 25 May of this year. EDIT: Other documentaries from "Customers who watched this item also watched": Manufacturing Dissent: U…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:49 AM
7

The problem with trying to reach common ground with feminism is feminism. They believe in the patriarchy, essentially that all men have oppressed all women for all of history. They don't believe that there are differences between men and women that are biological as opposed to cultural. So they think that men are culturally indoctrinated to oppress women, so the very suggestion that men have serious problems that need to be solved is not something they can deal with. The closest they can come is…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:52 PM
1

There's very little overlap between them, and the tactic of calling things "manosphere" is frequently used against the MRM.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:26 PM
4

Manosphere ideologies like The Red Pill and MGTOW and inceldom I stopped watching here. The guy's just conflating very different things in order to smear them.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:42 PM
6

It's not that strange. Generic anti-sjws will be annoyed at the excesses of feminism and PC culture, and will be likely to click on and upvote things like that. They'll be less likely to click on and upvote things about things like homelessness in general. So, clickbaity things are more likely to hit /r/all.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:35 PM
8

There are plenty of examples of the MRM community saying women's claims about issues they face are false So many that you couldn't find one example?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:59 PM
3

We don't believe in a patriarchy, which is the idea that all men have been oppressing all women for all time. We don't even believe that men and women act as marxist-style classes in an attempt to gain power for their own sex and oppress the other. We generally disagree with the feminist idea that women are powerless. They generally support this idea by pointing to the ratio of male to female politicians, but that isn't a good measure of power. The point at which women got the vote in the U.S. w…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:34 PM
14

I don't know what has happened over the past few months but the majority of comments I post on here has been down-voted to oblivion and replied with harassment and people calling me a shill. So I took a look at the downvoted comments in your recent history in this sub. The things that you got downvotes for recently in this sub fall into two categories, personal insults, and discussion of the word feminazi in a post that hit /r/all. I'm not going to say that the people you insulted didn't deserve…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:15 AM
9

If you look at the FAQ in the sidebar, question 9 is WHERE CAN I FIND COVERAGE FROM TRUSTED SOURCES, ACADEMIC STUDIES, OR CRITICISM OF MEN'S RIGHTS ISSUES? And the answer lists a bunch of stuff, including several studies. I found this video, which is an hour and a half long discussion of research on domestic violence to be very good, although I don't know how much time you might be willing to spend on it. If neither of those things are useful, I'd suggest asking a more specific question.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:12 PM
6

the gender pay gap might actually be a real thing? I've looked into it. It isn't. What feminists mean by "pay gap" is that women get paid substantially less in an apples-to-apples comparison with men. That isn't the case. It is the case that the average amount women earn is different from the average amount men earn, and that the difference makes sense if you look at the different choices made on average by men and women. I only say this due to the overwhelming evidence to suggest that this is t…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:33 PM
8

post in question You're judging the whole sub by a comment at +1, which has a comment disagreeing with it also at +1? In a thread where the OP has +193?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:18 PM
7

Now, I know that there is good reason for MRAs to oppose certain kinds of feminism. You're trying to imply that the mainstream of feminism isn't the problem. It's mainstream feminism to believe in the Patriarchy, which is the idea that all men have been oppressing all women for all of history, and in the Blank Slate idea, which says that men and women aren't biologically different (aside from the obvious anatomical stuff). Put the two ideas together, and you get that all men are oppressive, and …
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:52 PM
3

I generally call TheRedPill subreddit "TRP", since it's shorter, and it avoids confusion between that sub and the more general idea of being "red pilled". I don't know very much about TRP, because it's generally irrelevant to men's rights (and this sub). Yeah, people bring it up a lot when trying to come up with a criticism of us, but that doesn't make it relevant. toxic masculinity Toxic masculinity is a concept that was made up to attack masculinity, the essence of being a man. The standard de…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:31 PM
9

There is no single idea called the red pill. A lot of different ideas get referred to with that metaphor. Which idea somebody is talking about when they say 'red pilled' depends on which idea they're talking about. The only thing common to all the various ideas is that they're considered by the idea holder to be true, but hidden from ordinary people in some way.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:02 PM
3

It's funny that you should claim that this sub is exceptionally right wing. I've been told by a couple of people here that this sub and the MRM in general is fundamentally a left wing movement, and I've had an argument here with an actual Marxist not long ago.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:25 PM
3

She a TERF so she should be a bit supportive of Peterson. That doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:11 PM
4

For example, fathers losing child custody cases; how many of those judges who gave custody to the mother were men? Irrelevant. You'd have to assume an in-group bias for males for this to have an effect, and I understand that female judges are more likely to award custody to the father than male judges. It can’t all be due to feminism, It's not. Some of it is due to gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:52 AM
14

I'm going to lay out the best theory of feminism I've been able to come up with so far, and the actions and inactions it explains. Feminism = Patriarchy Theory + The Blank Slate Patriarchy Theory is the assumption that all men have been oppressing all women for all of history. The Blank Slate is the idea that men and women are not different in their behavior on a biological level. Neither of these are true, but they assume them both. They sometimes look for things they can use as evidence of the…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:05 AM
3

It's a misunderstanding of conservatives. It claims conservatives are biased towards themselves, as if conservatives were all men and never women, and as if gynocentrism didn't affect conservatives as well as everybody else. It claims that conservatives don't care about equality. We do, although we reject the unrealistic idea of equality of outcomes, because it's a fundamental mistake about economics and though many nations have tried to achieve it, not one has ever even come close. Instead, we …
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:43 AM
3

That's not correct.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:09 AM
1

They have a subreddit at r/braincels.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:51 AM
8

Men's rights isn't related to the incel thing, but it is real. I'm not that familiar with them, but from what I've seen, they're men who face some sort of difficulty getting laid, have decided that this makes them victims, and have reached the conclusion that they can't ever change it. This leads them to rage and despair.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 02:38 AM
6

At 4:20 in that video, there's a chart with various studies mentioned. Here's the link to Mahalik 2003 and here's the link to a download page for Pleck 1986. I tried searching for the others, without being able to find the papers themselves online, but I did find the abstract for Cicone and Ruble 1978, which contained the interesting sentence "On the basis of these problems and of findings from studies that examine beliefs about males in different ways, it is suggested that highly stereotypic be…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 12:21 AM
3

The alt-right started out as right-minded people on the Internet who had some ideas not supported by the mainstream right (republicans). Not all of them were white nationalists, and I think in fact most weren't. This sounds like Milo's article on them, which is wrong. The sort of people Milo's article cover include people like Paul Joseph Watson and Mike Cernovich, who when they heard about "heilgate", immediately denounced the alt-right. The actual alt-right are and always have been all white n…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:47 AM
4

Having said all that, Peterson is a bit of a mess when it comes to history, political science, anthropology and other fields. If he were to debate someone like Noam Chomsky, for example, or anyone with a PHD in anthropology, he would be utterly savaged. I seriously doubt that. Peterson's mea culpa didn't really clarify his views, however, as Paul Elam noted. So what? Peterson hasn't addressed this. Peterson is making good points about other things. He doesn't need to address this thing. Men shou…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:08 AM
7

If you want major political support for mens rights issues, you must separate yourselves from the alt right, because the media will continue to lump you together. This doesn't even make sense. We are separate, and the media are lying. If we separate ourselves, we firstly don't achieve anything because the separation is already there, and secondly, the facts aren't having any impact on the media in the first place. The action you're proposing to take would have no effect in the real world, and it…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:28 PM
2

The title of this post is about Republicans, but the meme is about the alt-right. They are two very different things.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:28 PM
8

The alt right is kind of a constellation of causes who feel underrepresented by the normal right. Thus the "alt" part. In general any kind of crazy ends up there. This is false. The mainstream media has been pushing a narrative about the alt-right, but that doesn't make it true. The alt-right are white nationalists. We don't need to distance ourselves because we aren't close to them in the first place.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:26 PM
1

Peterson is basically a weird academic troll and a men's rights activist. Your article tries to use MRA as an insult. You're posting this in an MRA forum. Not only is MRA not an insult, which we're well aware of, since we're all MRAs, but also, we're well aware that Dr. Peterson has not joined our group.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 07:50 AM
11

Notice how when you tried to talk to the sub you agreed with, they shut you up. I think MensLib is a sub made by feminists to act as a token men's movement so they can point to it whenever they want to make people shut up about the problems men face. They are censorious (as you've discovered for yourself), and only interested in viewpoints that are exactly the same as theirs, not just pretty similar, exactly the same. There are, no doubt, a few people with decent intent who have been drawn to it…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:10 AM
3

but especially don't run with the statement "women are not oppressed" so easily. Well, women aren't oppressed. Women's issues matter despite the fact that it's a stretch to call them "oppression," First, you just disagreed with your previous sentence, and second, why do you think you need to remind us that women's issues matter? That's not something we disagree about. and even the ridiculous gender studies overthinking that tries to diagnose misogyny and problematic cultural attitudes can be wor…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:59 PM
4

So I ended up looking at the 4 volume history of the women's suffrage movement done by Susan B. Anthony, that covers 1840 to 1900. Not reading the whole thing, it's really long and stuffed full of details, many of which are irrelevant, just looking through and reading bits here and there. In the beginning, they were talking about how relieved they were that somebody else in the world thought as they did, and they talked about their difficulties with setting up a single meeting in a church to tal…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:11 PM
0

Even then, what's your point? Why are you so bent on making programming a boy's club? My point is that if girls are not fond of abstraction, there's no way to make CS palatable for them. Emphasis on the word if. You were the one that told me that girls are not fond of abstraction, I'm just telling you what the implication of your statement is. I actually disagree with your premise. Did you read the Google Manifesto? Yes, it was well written. I think Damore's quoted research on women, indicating …
/r/MensRights28/04/18 12:24 AM
1

Describing the purpose of a data structure, then going into how it works is a good idea. But if girls are not fond of abstraction, then there's no way to make CS palatable for them.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:29 PM
3

It only said that his philosophy was born from and is a mutation of yours. "It lied." Fixed that for ya.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:22 PM
1

I remember learning that one method involves making programming practical and relevant when teaching it, showing how to solve real life problems. Guy are usually okay with abstract problems, Doing programming well, beyond the basics, absolutely requires the ability to solve abstract problems, because in essence, that's all programming is, it's layer upon layer upon layer of abstraction. The goal is sometimes concrete, but the method of reaching the goal is a complex layering of abstractions.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:19 PM
2

Exactly in line with what I was saying. Not at all the same. If you agreed with me, something that you could have done was say “I agree” and not put a vague and mildly contradictory comment on the post haha. I didn't agree. I've been pretty clear about calling things not oppression, and then you suddenly wanted oppression and discrimination to mean the same thing, when they're quite different. The big thing I see a lot here are pictures of men working in mines, with references to wives living ca…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 09:15 PM
2

When I say oppression just think of discrimination or unfair treatment, however small. That's not what oppression means, though. If voting were some terrible thing that men have to endure but spare women from, we wouldn’t have broken away from the monarchical rule of the British. I don't follow this at all. Also, what made politics not suitable for women to the point where they should not be allowed to participate? Well, I gave you a sample of some of the 1887 anti-suffrage rhetoric. It boils do…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 05:36 AM
2

I’m not sure how to have your comment and then reply to it, so I’ll go in order. Put the greater-than sign at the beginning of the line, followed by a space, followed by the text you want to quote. You can also highlight text you want to reply to, then hit the reply button under the comment, and it will automatically quote stuff. I don't know how much of this applies if you're using a phone as opposed to a computer. If black men went from slavery to voting faster than women could get it, what do…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:21 AM
1

See how seriously you take women's opinions of men? I did not even mildly imply that women's opinions of men should not be taken seriously. I'm trying to see how you could honestly reach this bizarre conclusion, but I don't see how. Even if feminism mentioned men a lot, they don't need the approval of men. I didn't say they did. But MRAs talk about reasons for why women shouldn't hate men anymore, .... you think women should hate men? and Red pill focuses on convincing and tricking women into se…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:22 AM
2

I'm not saying that, more like, if he chose to self-impose a penance of some kind, I'd consider it a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:13 AM
7

If a rapist is truly sorry about what he/she did, I wholeheartedly believe that he/she should turn him/herself into the police. This reminds me of C. S. Lewis, a Christian apologist, who said "If you had committed a murder, the right Christian thing to do would be to give yourself up to the police and be hanged." That's the only way you can actually pay for your crime. I don't know if it's the only way. If that guy had decided to spend 500 hours as a volunteer at a soup kitchen, and then followe…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:11 AM
11

It is a self-serving non-resolution, on the same level as being a horrible person your entire life and them embracing religion, and then attacking average people for not doing the same. Yes, and I say that as a religious person. There is a type of Christianity where, if you say the magic words and mean them real hard, you're instantly all better, with no further action required. That's wrong. There's more to repentance than that. It's not instantaneous, it's a process whereby you transform yours…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:46 AM
8

I’m trying so hard to understand. Well, good. Here's a video of Karen Straughan talking about how domestic violence was perceived in the past which you might find useful, although it isn't directed at the specific points you brought up. Why are so many people saying that women have never been oppressed? I'd say that, in the periods of the past where you could legitimately say that women had a raw deal, men also had a raw deal, although it was a different raw deal. I don't think that there has ev…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:38 AM
1

Exactly...all of these mention and focus on women in some way. Only one of them arguably focuses on women. You also seem to have completely missed the topics "men generally", "false rape accusations", "discrimination against men", "negative assumptions about men", and "fathers", which are not only not about women, but don't mention them. Merely mentioning women is a major moving of the goalposts. That is not what you said. You said that we "only talk about women 99% of the time" and that there w…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:13 AM
3

But ultimately, we need either one egalitarian movement or two separate, at least mildly cooperative movements for gender equality. That would be ideal. The problem is that feminism is not egalitarian, and is not interested in even mild cooperation. Women's rights and men's rights, the new dual-armed human rights movement. It's a nice thought, but feminism has to go first. Right. And according to feminism, feminism will always 'have to go first'. They'll keep looking at things that have long sin…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:31 PM
3

Why would a group for Mens Rights, only talk about women 99% of the time? Let's take a look at the top posts right now. First, we have a sticky post entitled "Is There Anything Good About Men?", which is about men, not about women. Second, a post entitled "The "New Scientist" replaced science with...7 out of 7 stories about Patriarchy etc.", which is about a site which is supposed to be focusing on science instead focusing on feminist dogma, and so is not about women. Third, a post about a false…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:11 PM
3

I don't think that presenting a fairly reasonable argument that someone else made, then whining about fake internet points, is actually a counterargument. Maybe try making a reasonable argument of your own.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:27 AM
2

So your argument is that in reality, feminism, not just one branch, but all of feminism, declares all men to be rapists and assholes? I'm not saying "the feminism of the past was good". I'm saying that the people who say they were are not in agreement with you about the feminism of the past saying that all men are rapists and assholes, and that therefore the people who say that are not throwing anybody under the bus.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:02 AM
1

It does do harm because it frames men of the past as bigots and rapists Saying that that feminism was not always evil, or that there were real problems to be solved in the past, does not do that.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:40 AM
6

Let's note trannies want to make it illegal to say what a woman is. Trans people and SJWs are not the same thing. Names do not concern us. If this were true, you would not be so worried about the descriptive term TERF and complaining about how it's 'abusive'.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:19 AM
1

Standard MRA (who believes that feminism was historically good) is willing to throw his father and grandfather under the bus, just so that he can get some mainstream support for his views, just so that he doesn't get thrown under the bus as well! Is this position worthy of respect? What do you mean by throwing his father and grandfather under the bus? Stating something that, in your view, is inaccurate does no harm to anybody's father or grandfather, even if your view that they're incorrect is t…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:20 PM
3

It's simple. They want to avoid the knee-jerk backlash against people who speak out against feminism, to the extent that they can avoid it. They want to avoid arguments like "oh, so you hate women then?" or "oh, so you don't want women to vote then?" or "oh, so you don't think women should be allowed outside the home and the kitchen?". I take a slightly different position. I know that some people say there are good arguments against 1st and 2nd wave feminism. I know that some people say that the…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:09 PM
2

That post was offtopic, sure, but as you point out, "Usually they don't get a lot of traction but occasionally one seems to make it up there."
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:52 PM
4

The only thing a woman needs to get abused with that word is to not buy tranny BS. ... They're still just deluded perverted men. In reality, we need laws to ban trannies from everywhere Right. All you're doing is disagreeing with them. Just disagreeing with them. You're certainly not calling them nasty names or advocating that they be mistreated by law.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:38 PM
1

I am repeating the earlier argument because obviously you did not understand it the first time. That's foolish. If I did not understand it the first time, then why would you expect that a repetition of exactly the same words would suddenly make me see what you're trying to say? You did not make a counter arguement, Bullshit. The very first thing I said to you was my counter argument. It was this: "Nobody made any assertions about government assistance. Even if your quote were related, marxism ha…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:27 PM
3

Nobody is a "TERF", it's just a term of abuse for women who don't buy tranny BS. That's some TERF BS. TERFs don't like being called TERFs, which doesn't make sense, because it's just an acronym for what they believe. They are Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists. Don't confuse women and feminists, they are not the same. Don't confuse people who don't buy the trans thing with TERFs. TERFs are not just feminists and not just people who don't buy the trans thing, they're radical feminists whose hat…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:19 PM
11

According to the SPLC's own graph, MRA sources were mentioned a total of 8 times, and Mainstream sources 23 times. Also, Ben Shapiro, the Jewish Orthodox Jew with yamulke on top, was mentioned 4 times. Given that they're quoting TRS, a rather unapologetically antisemitic site, it clearly shows a flaw in their method. I actually tried to locate the threads the SPLC claimed existed on TRS, with no success. So there's no way to check the SPLC's biased narrative.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:32 AM
2

Feminism has its TERFs, and we have our own equivalent. TERFs are radical feminists, who as a consequence of the misandry of their radical feminism, exclude trans women from their form of feminism because they are in their eyes men, and they hate men. Our "equivalent" are MRAs who, as a consequence of their disagreement with you are willing to state their disagreement with you, and have no problem with women, with trans men, or with women and trans men being part of their community. We do not ha…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:19 AM
2

The very first decision made by the very first group of communists at their very first meeting was, and i quote, “The emancipation of the working class can only be achieved by the working class itself — without the assistance of governments.” All you're doing here is repeating an earlier argument of yours that I've already addressed. And you haven't addressed the counter-argument I made the first time. That is rich considering you have completely ignored mine. All you're doing here is echoing my…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:47 PM
2

SJW have always been about top down change. That's not really a difference between them and communists. if you want to tell if a movement is being co-opted or is true to its original principles, you look at the original principles. Here's where it becomes obvious you didn't read my argument. I already told you, SJWs were never classical marxists. classical liberalism You have no problem saying classical liberalism, but have a problem with classical marxism?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:48 AM
3

And they are not "Cultural Marsists" that term is incoherent. The very first decision made by the very first group of communists at their very first meeting was, and i quote, “The emancipation of the working class can only be achieved by the working class itself — without the assistance of governments.” What's incoherent is your argument. Nobody made any assertions about government assistance. Even if your quote were related, marxism has existed for about 150 years and been tried for something l…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:31 AM
5

Sure. Left is right, up is down, slavery is freedom, and Big Brother is looking out for your best interests.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:17 PM
0

I'll give you some advice based on what has and hasn't worked on me. Seeing a short clip of the procedure in The Red Pill got me from "technically girls have the right of genital integrity, whereas boys don't, but it's not a real problem" to "well, that was hard to watch. clearly there's a problem, and something should be done, the question is what." Seeing protesters with blood on their crotch made me roll my eyes and think of feminists smearing period blood on their faces and making fools out …
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:11 PM
2

it seems like a lot of people here just bash feminism That's not actually a very accurate assessment. I looked at the front page of this sub, and I found only one post critical of feminism, in which a feminist defends herself for saying "I hate men". The post that is second (not counting sticky posts) is a post of a tweet by Laci Green, a feminist, with 463 points. Not that we don't criticize feminism or that feminism doesn't deserve the criticism, but that's not even close to all we do. I just …
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:05 AM
7

If actual alt-righters were here, you'd see them saying things about the "JQ" and how America should be a white nation. You don't even see that sort of thing posted here and then heavily downvoted, like the SJW trolling, you just don't see any at all.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:36 PM
7

Let me sum up the article: USA Today High School Sports reports that Fosters Daily Democrat reports that a guy named Klein told them that 2 coaches told him that 2 other coaches said something. The accuser coaches "felt the conversation was inappropriate and wanted to warn Klein of the threat, regardless of how legitimate it may have been." According to the article, "Klein’s daughter has competed as part of the ORYA baseball program since 2012, previously without incident with other female playe…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:31 AM
6

After seeing Big Red's antics, I stumbled on Karen Straughan's youtube channel. Logic, facts, and fairness carry a lot of weight with me, and her channel was packed full of logical, fact-based arguments in favor of fairness.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:05 AM
8

top answer with 30 points: we like menslib instead, and think MRAs base their entire philosophy on opposing feminism almost the top answer with 28 points: OMG MRAs are the KKK!!!!!oneone1!!, by a guy literally named bigoted bill with 16 points: MRAs are usually sexist, always wrong about why a problem is a problem, and most of their identified problems aren't problems with 16 points: we can't trust MRAs to not be terrible These people do not understand the MRM, don't listen to the MRM, believe t…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:30 PM
2

it will be interesting to see how fast she gets excommunicated from the loudest camp. I would post this video on a feminist sub if I wasn't banned from those subs. I wouldn't recommend that. Getting her noticed by mainstream feminists might get her excommunicated fast, but who got her noticed might also get noticed, and provide mainstream feminists with a handy counternarrative about how those mean MRAs made them be mean to her, so it's totally their fault.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:24 PM
1

The is "reactionary" in the literal sense that they simply reacted to whatever Obama did and were automatically against it. In other words, exactly like the Democrats are being reactionary now?
/r/MensRights12/04/18 05:50 PM
1

The Republicans’ rhetoric since Bush doesn’t seem like a coherent political philosophy but simply reactionary propaganda. "Reactionary" doesn't have a meaning, it's just a slur word used by the left for people whose politics they disagree with. From where Im standing the parties’ economic policies differ only in minor detail and presentation. Cut taxes and the amount of government vs. increase taxes and the amount of government. Not exactly a matter of minor detail or presentation.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 07:51 AM
3

I refuse to tell you what makes a good morani [warrior]. But I will tell you what makes a great morani. When the moment calls for fierceness a good morani is very ferocious. And when the moment calls for kindness, a good morani is utterly tender. Now, what makes a great morani is knowing which moment is which! (Real, 64) I thought this was very well said.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:22 AM
6

The toxic masculinity was so suffocating, he felt he couldn’t pursue any of his interests without being criticized. He was different in that he had unique talents. His dad wasn’t around and he turned to art as a means to escape. He was judged for playing the flute. For wanting to ride horses. For cooking. “People would call me a sissy for wanting to cook, think about that,” he says. “It’s like everything you did as a man was wrong.” He's doing the standard feminist thing of confusing stereotypes…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:25 AM
2

Today's American political parties are both capitalists and both firmly invested in the traditions and hierarchies that obtain in the US. Capitalism isn't really even political, it's just the most efficient economic system humans have ever produced. That both Republicans and Democrats support it doesn't make either rightwing, it just makes them not complete morons. And really, only Republicans are invested in traditions or respect hierarchies. Democrats make fun of Republicans for doing so.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:51 PM
7

I think the points that woman made are worth heeding in any discussion about men's rights, gender issues, or equality. Oh, really? Which points did she make that are worth heeding? Was it this one? And as for the second thing I learned, the MAJORITY of you people are just as reactionary, judgmental, high-minded, condescending, patronizing and unable to see your flaws... as much as any feminist. Or this one? The way society is set up at the moment I think women face more challenges, the majority …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:30 PM
1

If he/she wavers for a second, then he/she is a sexist and an enemy of men. Simple as that. Bullshit. You just plain can't judge people on whether or not they hesitate for a second on some random question.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:20 AM
5

The hateful attacks against feminist comes from the people in the extreme positions of the "rightwing" -network analysis graph. I'm familiar with most of those (the one I don't know at all is WhiteRights), and they aren't actually rightwing. Maybe altright or T_D, sort of, but not the rest. In T_D, they are as mad at establishment Republicans as at establishment Democrats. I'm not that familiar with the now-banned altright sub itself, but I know that the alt right generally consider themselves n…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:15 AM
3

For me this was somewhat eye opening and explains a lot of the hateful comments MRA's get. I'm not following this at all.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 12:45 AM
2

So after poking around a bit in the comments, apparently there was some number of mods in The_Donald who were also mods of TRP, and then there was some mod drama in T_D, and a bunch of people were unmodded and then remodded under alts. Also, it uses only mods in common to determine which things are related, which is a limited view that will catch all sorts of non-associations that have more to do with one particular mod happening to have multiple unrelated interests. For example, in the MensRigh…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:04 PM
4

I put somewhere else that I feel like it creates an us vs them thing. Not really. You may be missing the context of the common feminist claim that violence against men by women doesn't happen at all. Saying that something does actually exist isn't setting up an us vs. them thing. I LOVE the hashtag #violenceisviolence - if its women on men, if its men on women, if its gay men on gay men, if its women on trans women etc. Its ALL a problem. I don't think anyone around here is going to disagree wit…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:38 PM
9

But I get turned off quickly because so much content feels anti-woman or anti-feminist. Those two things are very, very different. To be against women is to be against half of the human race over an unchangeable characteristic which they did not select for themselves. To be against feminism is to oppose a specific political group whose central political philosophy is to set men and women against each other in a zero-sum game where the goal is to dominate and oppress the opposite sex, rather than…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:06 PM
2

They're typical traits of the kind of person the term soyboy fits. There's no causation, but there is a correlation. Like SJWs and blue hair.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 05:10 PM
3

According to the Urban Dictionary definitions, along with being a feminist, a "soy boy" is defined as a man who is non-athletic, who doesn't have a high sex drive, who hasn't been in a physical fight, who--of course--drinks soy, and basically who doesn't conform to the stereotype of a traditional man That's not a fair summary of the urban dictionary definitions. I'll list all of the attributes that the top definition mentions that your summary didn't. completely and utterly lacks all necessary m…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 01:51 AM
1

You may not have felt so good if you were of fighting age during the Vietnam war, during which time Henry Kissinger stated that soldiers were "dumb, stupid animals" to be used as "tools" for American foreign policy. You think I'm going to feel different about politics because one dumb guy said one dumb thing once, before I was born? We have a tendency to romanticize the past. I'm not even talking about the past, much less romanticizing it.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:13 PM
18

How do you feel about conservative, anti-feminist female voices defending men As a conservative, anti-feminist male, really good. And I still feel good about left-wing feminist females doing the same thing. Christina Hoff Sommers and Camille Paglia are good people who talk sense about a lot of things, even if I don't think much of their choices to support Hillary and Jill Stein. I often feel like this group has more anger at other women, That's not an accurate read on them. It's pretty easy for …
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:54 AM
15

Here at The Bloody Steak vegan restaurant, we want to promote veganism from a pro-meat perspective! That means we are absolutely committed to challenging toxic vegetables and our vegetable culture. We founded this restaurant to combat unhealthy mainstream messages about vegetables, like "you should eat vegetables" and "vegetables are healthy". Instead, we support the messages of positive veganism, like "vegetables are icky" and "steak is vegan". P.S. Whatever you do, don't go to the vegan restau…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:03 AM
5

making inappropriate remarks, shouting out of a car window as she walks down the street, whipping out his genitalia after one too many drinks, or being opportunistically crude at a coffee shop, even as she sits there with a very young child ... How dare we do that to something so exquisite and delicious? Maybe, just maybe, there's a middle way in between the two extremes. Maybe we don't have to choose between treating all women identically as either dirty tramps to molest or else exquisite and d…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:44 AM
2

I'd read female activist as exactly that: an activist who is female. In the context of this sub, presumably we're talking about an activist for men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:35 PM
3

You're confusing feminists and females. They aren't the same thing.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:32 PM
7

I don't like the term "feminazi". There are several reasons. First, it has a severe lack of persuasive power. Has anyone who's ever called you a "nazi" ever persuaded you of anything? I'd much rather convince a feminist that men have problems too, or that "patriarchy theory" is sexist and wrong, than that I, personally, am a jerk who shouldn't be listened to because I insulted her. Second, it is too easy to use to paint the MRM as bad and to dismiss us. Many feminists will still try to paint us …
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:25 PM
6

Well, I've never once heard of groups of sane feminists talking about, for example, that men have real problems that are not their own fault. Individual sane feminists do, and we love them for it, and feminism treats them badly for it. The crazy ones run the feminist organizations, and run the women's studies departments, and write the theories. It's no wonder you don't hear much about the exceptions to the rule.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 06:09 PM
5

All sexes are equal, but some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 05:20 PM
2

CAFE put out a video of a professor giving a presentation on domestic violence statistics to the Canadian senate. It's an hour and a half long, but it's well done.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:10 PM
9

Men are incarcerated because they commit more crimes. That's not a “disadvantage”. That’s a consequence of actions they CHOOSE. Have you been to prison? Why or why not? This argument is correct as presented. Men commit more crimes, and go to jail at a higher rate. Black people commit more crimes, and go to jail at a higher rate. Neither of these are injustices. However, studies have shown that black people receive 10% longer sentences on average than white people for the same crime, and that is …
/r/MensRights14/03/18 11:54 AM
19

Their most basic theory is the patriarchy, which is the idea that men have always been oppressing women systematically throughout history. It's not that they have a view here or there that's anti-male; the foundation of their worldview is that men harm women and have always harmed women and always will harm women because that's how men are.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 10:51 PM
4

Is it because is a tenured University professor and that gives him more credibility and reputation than let's say a fairly popular youtuber like Sargon of Akkad or a journalist/media personality like Dave Rubin? There have been other tenured university professors who have been vocally anti-SJW, like Gad Saad and Janice Fiamengo. So it's not that. Here are some things I've noticed that might be making a difference: He has nuanced views, and isn't jumping on someone else's bandwagon. He has an und…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 04:24 AM
26

I'm mantired of all these manwords, man.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:01 AM
10

Cassie Jaye, Warren Farrell, Janice Fiamengo, and Camille Paglia all started out as feminists. Some of them still are. I've been thinking that it's better to treat individual feminists as if they might be the next Cassie Jaye. She didn't change her mind overnight. She might not have changed her mind if she'd run into a lot of harshness.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:23 AM
5

You're right, but if you search for "ted talks men's rights", it won't ask if you mean "ted talks women's rights". Not that that's a reason to get mad at the guy who wrote the algorithm either, since men's rights is not as common a topic as women's rights.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:27 AM
10

"Toxic masculinity" is a gendered slur. The word masculinity means the essence of being a man. The word toxic means poison. Put them together, and you get "the essence of being a man is poison". Sometimes, feminists will try to defend their gendered slur, as in this comic. At the end of the comic, the writer comes up with "toxic gender expectations" as a synonym. Why not use the gender neutral term as a replacement? Feminists are generally extraordinarily sensitive to gendered slurs and non-gend…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:46 AM
5

I cannot subscribe to your view that men's rights and race have nothing in common I'm not going that far. There are overlaps, like the anti-white male hatred from SJWs, the double-whammy of racial and gender sentencing gaps for black men, and the problem of fatherlessness hitting the black community especially hard. I'm just saying that race isn't an MRA issue in itself, even though it is sometimes relevant to some of our issues. I don't want to sound all intersectional, but it's hard for me to …
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:31 AM
16

We don't care about race issues here. The alt-right considers the slow demographic replacement of white people to be an urgent emergency; we don't care about it. We are mostly egalitarian rather than traditionalist, and consider the problems facing men and boys to be an urgent emergency; they're traditionalists and don't care about it. There's no resemblance, and I have yet to detect an individual who has been part of both groups at the same time. I have heard of one, and only one, individual wh…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:29 AM
7

You idiots are allllll about free speech. so I go to your debate subreddit, /r/debatealtright, "Our" debate subreddit. We have nothing to do with the alt right. Next time you want to totally pwn somebody and call them idiots, you might want to do the most basic and minimal of research to find out whether they're the target you're looking for, before you make yourself look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:32 AM
1

So, you're a bot that duplicates the existing functionality of the 'other discussions' tab by posting a useless comment?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:03 PM
1

I don't feel bad for them. They chose their path, and they can unchoose it any time they want.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 07:20 PM
1

So your only example is a video posted here that got only 40% upvoted, and where the only comment that got upvoted by anyone other than the author criticizes the video as well as praising it?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 07:14 PM
8

The researchers also found that when men acted assertive and warm — in general, not considered the norm for male behavior — they reported lower incivility from their male counterparts. This suggests men actually get a social credit for partially deviating from their gender stereotypes, a benefit that women are not afforded. My guess would be simpler. Instead of some complex interactions with social credit and partial deviations from gender stereotypes, I'd suggest that men respond in kind to oth…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:56 PM
2

A better argument is not to dispute whether or not they've committed a logical fallacy (although they have), it's to ask why, if feminism really is about equal rights, they never do anything to help men out. There isn't equality in the number of domestic violence shelters, with women having 2000 in the U.S. and men having 2. When's the last time you heard feminists complain about that?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:30 PM
3

Literally everyone has implicit bias. That isn't inherently a bad thing--it's just important to understand your biases and how you can use them or counter them effectively. Understanding biases that actually exist is quite useful. I know the Duluth Model. I'm not some new MRA. So you've probably heard of Erin Pizzey, and Warren Ferrell, and Christina Hoff Sommers, and Cassie Jaye, and how they were treated by feminism when they noticed that men had problems too. Feminism isn't our enemy because …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 06:23 PM
7

When society accepts feminists, but doesn't understand the MRA movement, it's easy to feel like it is the fault of feminists and demonize them without understanding all of the issues. I don't think this is an accurate description. Society doesn't accept feminists all that much (only 18% of women in America call themselves feminists IIRC), and society doesn't so much misunderstand the MRM as it doesn't know we exist. Also, blaming feminists for being our enemy when that's exactly how they act is …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:28 AM
27

Only a small minority of the feminist movement want to actually eradicate men's rights though. Most just want equal rights for women, which is a good thing. The mainstream of feminism is interested in the MRM only to try to stop it and what we want to do. Perhaps the majority of self-identified feminists are not like that, but those who control the organizations and power are like that. For me this sub should be that - a sane conversation about men's issues, not a shit throwing contest about who…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:06 PM
16

Karen Straughan's youtube channel has some really informative stuff, especially back when she first started it. Link to her channel sorted by oldest first Bane666au's youtube channel is good. His channel is more humorous sarcasm based than the "anger based" type you objected to in a comment. Tom Golden's 'Men Are Good!' channel and The Prim Reaper both have an overtly kind and friendly vibe, if even humorous sarcasm is not your cup of tea. I don't know if youtube channels are close enough to pod…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:12 PM
11

From the NLRB memo: "The Charging Party’s use of stereotypes based on purported biological differences between women and men should not be treated differently than the types of conduct the Board found unprotected in these cases. [Damore's] statements about immutable traits linked to sex—such as women’s heightened neuroticism and men’s prevalence at the top of the IQ distribution—were discriminatory and constituted sexual harassment, notwithstanding [his] effort to cloak [his] comments with “scie…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:00 AM
22

To be clear, the title of this post is wrong. He didn't lose his lawsuit against Google, rather the NLRB released a memo sent in January, which came to the bizarre conclusion that Damore's memo contained discriminatory statements. In response to the memo, Damore dismissed his complaint with the NLRB. Here's a link to the NLRB case. There's a link to the memo on that page, and it's really bizarre. In it, they compare Damore's statements to a time when an employee randomly accused her boss of bein…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:26 AM
16

But when Donald Trump repeated twice that Rob declared his innocence, I was floored. What was his intent in emphasizing that point? My friend turned to me and said, “The President of the United States just called you a liar.” No, the President just said that your ex called you a liar. The words “mere allegation” and “falsely accused” meant to imply that I am a liar. No, actually, 'mere allegation' implies that we don't know the truth yet, and he commented on the falsely accused in describing a w…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:22 PM
1

A link to a 2 hour video is not a timestamp. I'm not going to watch a 2 hour video to find the one sentence that you're complaining about.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:18 AM
0

So we should avoid saying true things because bad people will misrepresent us when we do? Because if we say anything in support of men's rights at all that's what happens. I'm not going to shut up about something just because somebody is going to misrepresent me.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:54 PM
3

Are you saying it's not okay to be white, or that the majority of construction workers are not male? Or are you saying that it's okay to be white, but not okay to say so, and that the majority of construction workers are male, but it's not okay to say so?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:40 PM
5

Why not just view a video of pretty ponies you sap? I have to say, this is by far the weirdest and most surreal attempted insult I have ever received.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:21 AM
5

I see no reason to believe that you are representing his views correctly. I've watched dozens of hours of Jordan Peterson talking on youtube, and I have not once seen him say that women should not take responsibility. If you think I'm wrong, link me to the youtube video where he actually says what you claim he said.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:08 AM
1

Demanding things be fixed first is delusional. How not to do it: "Fix it!" "Fix what?" "The problem!" "What problem?" "If you don't know, I'm not going to tell you!"
/r/MensRights06/02/18 06:09 AM
73

If feminism actually did the work of representing both genders, I'd be fine with the name only referencing females.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:55 PM
7

They have a store that sells Bud Light and has automatic sliding doors in the middle of a medieval battlefield and a knight that saves everyone by shooting blue light from his sword into the heavens, and you're worried that a female soldier may not be entirely realistic?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:21 AM
25

"There are 2000 domestic abuse shelters for women in the U.S., and only one that takes both men and women. What are men with violent partners and children supposed to do? Stay and just take the abuse, and hope their partner hits them more than the kids? Hit back and get arrested? Kidnap the kids and be hunted by the law? Get out, and leave the kids in a terrible situation? Women in this situation have the good option of taking the kids with her to a domestic violence shelter; men in this situati…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:18 PM
1

I can tell you about my impression of the issue and how it's been discussed from my point of view as a circumcised MRA. The first thing that comes to mind is that the comparison to FGM seems to fit the feminist anti-MRA stereotype. My understanding of FGM is that there are about 4 different levels of procedure, usually carried out by medically untrained people in unhygenic circumstances, with the lowest level being less than circumcision, the second level being essentially equivalent to circumci…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:33 AM
8

Overall, it's incredibly biased. The first story, about a pot of spilled food, tries to push the idea that the mom is acting reasonably, by having the rude guest overreact in the aftermath. In fact, she should not have been trying to both feed her young kids and cook at the same time. Or, if she did, she should have maintained a clear awareness that she's performing two tasks at once that both require her constant attention, so that she wouldn't end up getting too distracted by one of them. Whil…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 09:43 PM
6

There's a feminist youtuber by the name of Brittany Simon who did a 50 minute review of The Red Pill that I thought actually engaged the film. It's been about 7 months since I've seen the review, but she did seem to be honest in her criticisms, although her criticisms did often have problems with facts and/or logic. After she posted her review, she got invited to go on the Honey Badger Radio channel for an interview. I saw at least part of that interview, and she seemed basically reasonable ther…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:50 PM
1

Everyone under 70k is going to be worse off. I think this comes from left-wing attempts to twist the numbers in their political favor. Perhaps it would be true if the temporary cuts are not renewed or made permanent by 2027 or so, but even then I don't think this takes into account people who just don't pay taxes. This sort of tax approach doesn't really help growth and makes the economy more vulernable, and increases debt. I'm not sure how it could make the economy more vulnerable. Really, I th…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:33 AM
1

And is that why you keep adopting their values after a few years? Adopting their values? Do the left even have values? What we do is rather different than your silly strawman. We remember the mistakes of our ancestors, as well as remembering what they did right. What they did right is not simply whatever random flailing about the left happened to do in the past. We might remember spectacularly bad failures to avoid them, but the majority of what happened in the past dies with the past. We only r…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:11 AM
1

These neo-liberals are no different from the neo-conservatives and are right wingers. The opposition to Trump from the deep state is right wing. This is just plain delusion. Not to be obvious but everyone thinks preserving values they agree with is a good thing. Sure, but that's not what I said. The left is chaotic and destructive, but not to the point of deliberately destroying things they agree with. The right is orderly and preserves things, but not to the point of deliberately preserving thi…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:52 AM
1

Ok then you don't know what going even further to the right means for men economically. I do, which is why I support it. See how men are worse off after the gop tax bill? You misspelled better. More importantly, why does my disagreement with you about whether one economic approach or another is best mean that I'm somehow a bad MRA? Why are you in charge of who gets kicked off the island for unrelated opinions? Why should we kick anybody off the island for unrelated opinions?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:04 AM
1

That's not the case, so there's no problem to be solved.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:09 PM
1

As representative of a certain point of view (as I explained in the OP). I was interested in the attitude, not the content. Oh, I think I see what you did. You thought rightwingwatch was a right wing site. It's not. It's a very very left-wing site. The point of their existence is to bash the right. Oh come on that old excuse is so past it's sell by date these days. Oh, come on yourself. Calling something an 'excuse' does not make it one. The problem here is that you want to have conservatives as…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:08 PM
1

So, you want me and everyone like me to stop being an MRA, because you don't like one bill that was passed by one party in one country one time. Wonderful. Let's exclude half of the movement for no reason. That'll work out real well, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:15 PM
1

I didn't bother to read it. Then why would you bother to cite it? Just using it to illustrate a point. ... Which it did not accomplish, because it didn't fit the point you were trying to make. You were trying to talk about right wing groups criticizing each other, but there were no right wing groups criticizing each other. Well yeah the authoritarian "sheep" have no goal at all. Authoritarians and sheep are entirely beside the point. I don't think there is any positive description because the ri…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:47 AM
1

This article seems to be another example of competing right wing groups judging each other on the basis of how they treat their women. There was nothing in the article about right wing groups judging each other by how they treat their women. The article, BTW, was pretty stunningly bad. It calls one obnoxious tweet received by one woman and a few youtube comments misinterpreting another unrelated woman's ideas "an intense harassment campaign". It then proceeds to make the same mistaken misunderst…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:19 PM
13

and this whole “us vs feminism” attitude is what most people dislike about this sub. The MRM vs feminism is not a battle the MRM started. Feminism started it, and they could stop it too, if they wanted to. The majority of stuff I see that reaches the front page from this sub is stuff that has nothing to do with men’s rights. I just took a look at the front page, and found that this is not true. So I do hope you guys start downvoting the shit out of anything women hating, You say that like we are…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:21 AM
2

First, men and women are biologically different, so while those are different numbers, those are probably fair standards. Second, military physical fitness standards have been segregated by both sex and age for a long time. An 18 year old man and a 60 year old woman should not be artificially held to the same standard of physical fitness. In fact, that's a pretty long time. When I was in, to pass the PFA a male in my age group would need to do it in about 12 or 13 minutes. And they explain in th…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:10 PM
3

I don't think that was the point being made. I think it was essentially that making it about which gender has it worse overall is bad.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:13 PM
19

This "/r/MensRights strongly supports principles of free speech." sounds exactly like what the alt-right spews out. Freedom of speech sounds nothing like what the alt-right says.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:47 PM
5

The deleted comments were likely worse as well. What!?!? The mods did their jobs and got rid of the actual misogyny? This sub really is a hate group! Why would the mods delete actual misogyny if they didn't hate women? Hiterally Litler!!!!
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:40 PM
1

What does this mean? Exactly what it says. Being invalid and being misogyny are different. Are you agreeing with my statement that isn't not a valid point or are you disagreeing? I deliberately avoided addressing that because it's beside the point. The girl did not expose herself to strangers, there is absolutely no nudity. That's a technicality. She's lifting her skirt in a symbolic way for a political purpose, she is not making a sexual advance on anyone or getting her rocks off. If a man were…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:24 AM
3

It's not a valid point Well, there's a difference between being an invalid point and being misogyny. I think it's pathetic I can't see why you'd think that. the attitude of the community here is the reason I don't call myself an MRA. What attitude is that?
/r/MensRights31/10/17 12:27 AM
1

will you stop calling yourself an MRA if at some point the movement were taken over by TRP type people? I would. The only way this happens is if all the real problems are solved. When all the real problems are solved, there's not much of a reason to keep the identity.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 11:46 PM
5

I've seen this discussed before on other subs, and everytime it comes up, it's dismissed as fake, which is exactly what it looks like to me.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 12:32 AM
5

Remember that not every men's rights issue is the fault of feminism. Some of them are, but others are just cultural or due to evolutionary psychology. Circumcision and male disposability predate feminism by a long time. If you haven't already see The Red Pill documentary, I recommend it. If you have and you haven't seen Cassie Jaye's behind the scenes footage on her youtube channel, I recommend that too. Pre-red pill Cassie Jaye should probably be your target audience. You can't persuade the unp…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:32 PM
3

With that brief description of archetypes I come back to the question of what Jordan Peterson wants to replace postmodernism with. The answer to that is not an archetype. He wants to replace postmodernism with truth, with logic, with honest speech and dialogue, with freedom of speech. With the Logos, if you know what that is. With speaking truth to power. The answer to that appears to be no, he has a much more simplistic prescription to fill the void: that men become heroes and women become moth…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:47 AM
11

this sub shouldn't be one cause people will look and call us sexists and bigots and stuff They're going to do that anyway.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:16 AM
8

Some of the problems men face are due to feminism. If you make a post mentioning such an issue, that it is due to feminism may well be pointed out in the comments. It's unlikely to involve screaming.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:48 AM
10

It's totally unneeded to criticize feminism. How do you suggest honestly discussing the harms caused by the Duluth Model against men, without once mentioning that it's a feminist theory pushed by feminism? Here's Karen Straughan's video that makes the point in more detail.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:38 AM
6

That was not his point. His point was "be the change you want to see". If you are serious, and not a concern troll, then this is good advice. If you are a concern troll, and not serious, then it's a good criticism.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:06 AM
4

Well, it does say "Warning: Viewers may find this content offensive". And they were right, laughing at the rights of others does turn out to be offensive.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 03:42 AM
3

It makes no sense to give her anonymity, but not give it to him. If neither were anonymous, that might discourage people from reporting a rape falsely, because if people figure out that they're lying, they'll take a hit to their reputation. If both were anonymous, the victim of a false accusation wouldn't have his name and photo forever associated with rape after being acquitted. With her being anonymous and him having his picture in the papers next to the word "rape", it's plausible for an accu…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:42 PM
3

Neither Trump nor Shapiro have anything to do with the alt right.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:28 PM
3

That's not something she's done.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:23 AM
2

YOU DEFEND THIS? You're not making sense.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:31 AM
3

She threw a lot of her credibility away with the alt right thing. I'm curious what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:12 PM
2

My grandfather fought in WWII you piece of shit. So did mine. Before my father was born. He nearly died, and if he had, my father would never have been born and neither would I. More importantly, that either of our grandparents fought in that war has nothing to do with anything. IMT Charter (Nuremberg) This has nothing to do with anything either.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:00 PM
14

Edit: yes, downvote rather than respond. That will surely do the trick. Respond to what exactly? Your offtopic smear of someone not associated with the MRM? Your absolutely hysterical claim that to agree with this guy on anything is to spit on the graves of WWII vets? Or your other hysterical claim that this Orthodox Jew is somehow exactly the same as the Nazis?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:15 AM
1

Believe it or not, most liberals realize Obama's policies went too far. Is there evidence of this? I hadn't heard any complaints about it from liberals.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:23 AM
6

I'm not very impressed by this effort at trolling. First, you have a title that involves MGTOW for some reason, then you never tell us in the body what you're talking about. Then, you quote a comment from somewhere, without saying why. Apparently, you disapprove of the comment, but don't bother to mention why. Then you accuse us of being fine with sexism, again without explanation. Then you accuse us of thinking men are better than women, again false, again without explanation. You follow up wit…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 01:57 AM
3

What it pretends it is: A collection of activists sharing news about the infringement of "men's rights," seeking more parity from the justice system, like 50/50 child custody in divorce cases. What it really is: Shedding its noble original mission statement, MensRights has devolved into the sort of anti-SJW/feminist/women cesspool that comprises the rest of this list. Posts equivocating away rape, defending rapists, and denying systemic oppression of women are more commonplace than anything else…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:11 PM
5

It's unclear what they're trying to imply. Are they trying to say that you ought to have some sort of say in your friend's sex life? Should you assume sex is even involved? Perhaps it's her brother, taking her home because she's too drunk to drive. Is your friend even a she? Clearly they want you to draw the line at ... something. But what?
/r/MensRights11/09/17 08:15 PM
1

This guy's not going to become a civil rights icon. In the words of the article: Cantwell’s blubbering face was plastered all over the mainstream media. Crying in fear is not the image of a hero. Neither are his repeated failures in life or getting repeatedly kicked out of lots of different groups. The only support by the article that he even had a civil rights complaint is that the author disagrees with the judge in a judgement call about whether he's a flight risk.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 03:37 AM
5

the blatant lack of self-awareness on display when this question is asked ... still manages to astonish me. The really stunning thing about this article was its lack of self-awareness. That she was trying to point out a lack of self-awareness in others while being un-self-aware herself is quite ironic. Instead, feminists and non-feminists (or, as I call them, dickwads) alike funnel endless reams of energy into debating the utterly pointless question of whether or not feminists are required by la…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:00 PM
3

Unlike the Elliot Rodgers case this guy (Cantwell) apparently was once an MRA. He wrote a few articles for AVFM then was given the boot. Apparently he went off the rails after that and became a Neo-Nazi. I did some amateur internet sleuthing to see if I could pin down the details. TL;DR: Cantwell wrote a few articles in 2014 for AVFM, then got kicked out for being partisan against the left and unwilling to knock it off. Paul Elam was very fair and reasonable to him the entire time. This was not …
/r/MensRights20/08/17 08:03 AM
1

That being said, Men's Rights Activism does have a lot of conservatives among it, and most Nazi and White Supremacists are strongly capitalist and overlap with political conservatism (I am in no way equating conservatives with any hate activities). This is bs. Nazi is short for National Socialist, not National Capitalist. The alt-right specifically is openly anti-conservative, and dislikes Republicans as much as they do Democrats. I've been paying attention to the alt-right for awhile, and when …
/r/MensRights19/08/17 11:39 PM
5

What is this a graph of? What does it have to do with censorship, facebook, autobots, or Australia? Why was it posted in /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 10:48 PM
3

But to make this easy for you, Rudolph, here’s what women in general want: to be treated like people. Right. You mean exactly what Rudolph was doing when he held the door open? He wrote to you to ask how to deal with crazy people who rip his head off when he's polite to them. Telling him that women want to be treated like people, besides being something he probably already knows, has nothing to do with his problem at all. Having said that, I am jolly glad you did because this gives me an excuse …
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:52 AM
1

the fitness test for new receuits has been dropped to just four push-ups and 20 sit ups To give you some context, the minimum required for a man over 65 in the U.S. Navy is 6 push-ups and 13 sit-ups, and for a woman aged 50-54 is 5 push-ups and 30 sit-ups. That's for satisfactory medium, the lowest non-probationary level. Realistically, to avoid being put on a probationary physical fitness program, you need at least a good low, and good low for females over 65 is 4 push-ups and 20 sit-ups. If yo…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:26 PM
24

I didn't finish the whole thing. She keeps assuming that any statistical difference is sexism as an outside force harming women. She doesn't give any reason for this assumption, just states it as if it were true. The actual numbers she quotes seem reasonable (as far as I can tell), but the numbers aren't her argument, the fallacious assumption that the cause of the numbers is sexism against women is her argument.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:32 AM
6

It's not more than 17 years old, since they mentioned "Senator Clinton", and she didn't become a Senator until after her husband left the White House.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:16 AM
4

Maybe we should avoid being humorless and ridiculous like the other side.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:05 PM
6

I've heard that vimeo is the go to link for people outside the U.S. who are having trouble with other services not having it. Here's the general set of links.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 06:17 PM
2

“That’s interesting,” the director responded, “because it shows that there are male victims of domestic violence.” Huh? The lesson the director took was not about the presence of a male perpetrator, but the presence of a male victim. Yeah. The director of a movie about male victims existing gets told a story about a male victim and says "gee, looks like a male victim". It's super confusing. How dare she have sympathy for a male victim.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:41 PM
1

The contrast is between privileged young girls worrying about the problems they have and young men on a battlefield worrying about the problems they have. The problems the young women worry about are real enough. They resemble, but are clearly not in the same league as the ones the soldiers have. The point is not "haha, lookit the vapid chicks", it's "the privileged ones aren't the males, as is so often claimed".
/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:12 PM
6

This comparison is way too forced. As if all girls are superficial cunts while all men go to war and die. That's not the comparison being made.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:37 PM
3

Other side begins to belittle, tone police, and change the argument. She didn't start the hostility. Your OP was fine, and then she asked a reasonable question. You stated your opinion that men who are circumcised have lower sensation, to the point that it's hard to orgasm, and that men are sex shamed. She asked why this was different from women, since many women have difficulty orgasming and are sex shamed also, but do moan. Same situation, different result. Either she's missing something, or e…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 05:16 AM
7

Mr Davies, a self-proclaimed “meninist”, Well, that's wrong. "Meninist" is an internet joke, not a real thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/17 05:39 AM
12

Link to the video on The Rubin Report channel. The OP is a link to a reupload to some other channel.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:33 PM
2

It really doesn't presume that men aren't disgusted by rape. It doesn't address that at all.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:37 PM
32

it could very well be that the search engine says "oh this search is extremely rare while "women's rights TED talk" is searched thousands of times more I think that's the point.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:02 PM
5

The Red Pill subreddit was named after the moment in the Matrix. The Red Pill documentary was named after the moment in the Matrix. They have nothing else in common. Also, most people are familiar with the Matrix, but not that particular subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:49 PM
9

A guy said "don't sink to their level" and you took a flying leap to the conclusion that that guy meant we should be unrealistic in order to appease them or something. Now, how should I sugarcoat this for you so that you don't come away thinking that I am dehumanizing feminists by pointing this out? I didn't say you were dehumanizing feminists. I said you had misunderstood the guy who you had replied to.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:31 AM
9

What the hell are you talking about? Why are you saying I want you to "sugarcoat" things? Was I sugarcoating things when I said "MRAs consider feminists to be their enemy, for the very good reason that that's how feminists act"? Is a feminist going to read that and think "that guy sounds like he's on our side"?
/r/MensRights16/05/17 01:59 AM
28

No. He's saying don't sink to their level. Feminists consider MRAs their enemy. Cassie Jaye humanized MRAs, and feminists responded by dehumanizing her. MRAs consider feminists to be their enemy, for the very good reason that that's how feminists act. But we shouldn't be dehumanizing feminists just because they're wrong.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:53 PM
4

If "Paul Elam is a jerk" is a valid argument against the MRM, then "Big Red is a jerk" is a valid argument against feminism.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 09:59 PM
-1

The alt-right is more of a liberal construct than an actual conservative construct. That's not quite correct. That is an accurate description of how liberals use the term, but how they use it doesn't have anything to do with the actual group. There is a real group of white nationalists (but not white supremacists, nazis, or fascists) who call themselves alt right and have since 2010 or so. They are right-wing, but not conservative. Which is not too much unlike men fighting for men's rights again…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:41 PM
3

But she actually mentions the subreddit in the movie. For about 5 seconds at the end of a two hour movie, along with MGTOW, only to explain that those are separate things which are not the subject of the documentary.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:26 PM
1

They could take out a lot of the feminist dialogue. I don't think they could have done that without seeming to take sides. As it is, feminists are resorting to lies in their efforts to shut it down, if there had been anything real to complain about they would have jumped on it. Her video diaries could've been taken out probably too. I'm not sure that would've been a good idea. It seems to me that they are relatable for feminists, as well as providing a bit of a plot. Feminist trying to quiet dow…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:43 AM
1

What specifically would you like for it to have covered that it didn't, and what precisely would you cut out in order to fit the other stuff in?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:02 PM
11

Feminists claim to want to help men, but in practice they don't do it, and if they do, it's by fighting the "patriarchy" instead of the problems themselves. Feminists tend not to know much about men's issues and blow off anything we find important. Some of them will show up to MRA rallies or speeches for the sole purpose of disrupting them. I suggest you stick to respectful responses, rather than "killer" ones. If you wreck/destroy/pwn somebody, they'll only dig their heels in farther.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 02:35 AM
5

Hurr durr ... retarded ... Russian roulette Stunning logic. Super convincing. /s
/r/MensRights04/05/17 02:10 AM
3

Redpilling has always meant understanding a generally unknown truth. The Red Pill subreddit is just an instance of this phrase.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 05:22 PM
1

What real communist state? Real communism has never been tried. /s
/r/MensRights03/05/17 03:34 AM
1

You guys seriously need to get your shit together. All this whining and woman hating just makes you look petty. I would have upvoted except for this bit. It's fine to treat girls and boys differently in some circumstances, because girls and boys are different.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 11:28 PM
13

No. The only similarity is the name. The subreddit gets mentioned for about 5 seconds at the end of the 2 hour movie, but only to say that it isn't related to the MRM.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:41 PM
3

You guys, we feminists don't hate men! It's hard to understand how you could think that. Just because we keep on inventing new gendered slurs against men...
/r/MensRights22/04/17 09:47 PM
16

I sat awake last night reading most of that thread. I guess my deep fear that I might meet a female rapist wanted to be fed or something, because I just kept reading... It was so disheartening. Be careful about that sort of thing. I remember reading a similar thread about people whose SO had committed suicide. I still remember a couple of the stories, like the one whose girlfriend blew her head off with a shotgun in front of him... I kept reading, and reading, and reading, and it was quite depre…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:38 PM
1

I don't have much in the way of concrete suggestions here. Hopefully someone else can figure that out. Well, that's a problem, because I don't have a clear idea of what you want. I'm not even sure if you have a clear idea what you want. I can't tell if you're mad because we aren't engaging in harsh, unscientific speculation about women, or because there are untrue negative opinions about women here, or because we're not like /r/theredpill, or because we complain about feminism, or because we com…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:29 PM
1

Mother: Attempts to murder her child. Custody granted! Father: Attempts to be a good father. Custody denied! It's a good thing courts care so much about the best interests of the child.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:34 PM
4

At their worst, MRAs are simply looking to justify misogyny under the guise of “rights.” At their best, people with MRA-like beliefs sometimes start off from the same place as feminists — wanting gender equity — but then disagree about how to go about it. Interesting. They "are MRAs" when they behave badly, but they "are people with MRA-like beliefs" when they behave well. But there is no societal norm dictating that women should invade men’s personal space, make them feel unsafe in public, and …
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:07 PM
8

With genders reversed: What he did was wrong, but come on, at 15 she didn't know what she was doing? I call BS. Yes, he should be arrested for what he did, she was a minor, but you can not tell me that she's so innocent in this little game either... If it were my daughter, I'd be mad at her also. 371 likes She knew what a dick is and looks like, there's no rape here lol 193 likes
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:26 AM
2

"There are some people who agree with us that use an obnoxious tone, therefore everything we say is wrong." That's not how this works. That's not how any of it works.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 09:06 PM
3

Milo is intentionally pointing this woman out, intentionally calling her "he", and even going so far as to provide a photo of her. If you'd looked at the video of the event, you'd have seen the photo. If nobody had told you "that's a chick", you'd have thought "that's a dude". And that's the point the photo makes: this is someone who looks like a dude, who wanted (and got) access to the ladies room. It's not a photo of somebody attempting to pass as the opposite sex and not quite pulling it off,…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 10:00 PM
3

I met a Christian computer programmer once. Which is basically proof.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:48 AM
6

She decided that "alt-right" means red pillers, PUAs, MRAs, gamergate, Breitbart, and neo-nazis. Then she acts like it's a surprising discovery that the group she created in her own head is suffering from "internal friction" and that the "group" may splinter completely. That's like saying that the group of Christian fundamentalists, consisting of feminists, MRAs, Scientology, atheists, computer programmers, Hindus, and the Green Party, are suffering from internal friction. If those Christian fun…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:41 AM
3

In the one case, the mother doesn't lie to the father, the mother doesn't cheat on the father, and they both know the true status of the kid's biological parents. In the other case, the mother lies to a man who isn't the father because she cheated on him and doesn't want him to stop providing financial support, and the man who isn't the father agreed to act as a father because he was lied to. In the first case, there was a simple parenting decision. In the other, there was deception and betrayal…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:18 AM
4

The only one on the girls' side that could possibly be considered bad is "weak". The only ones that could be considered good on the boys' side are "night" and "strong", and of course "masculine" and "boy" if you aren't sexist. Yeah, they're antonym pairs, but they aren't just antonym pairs, they're antonym pairs with the good one first and the bad one second.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 03:53 PM
1

I wonder how feminists would have reacted if the exact same video were titled "Female Privilege".
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:10 PM
6

Getting banned for insulting the intelligence of a moderator is not surprising or horrifying.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:36 AM
1

You can argue whether they were technically breaking the law, and if they were, whether they would be prosecutable cases. You can argue about whether to call it "rape". The only thing I know of that's rape, but not technically rape, is the "made to penetrate" stuff. But that's an MRA issue, not a feminist issue. And really, if it's something so far removed from rape that even a feminist isn't comfortable saying it's rape, it's not rape. I prefer translating it as "sexual consent culture", becaus…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 10:15 PM
3

That's why they get so upset about men who don't see a large, clear gap between sex and rape. Where are these alleged men that don't understand the difference between sex and rape?
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:13 AM
1

If you want to take the pope as a representation of Catholicism then that's your choice. Actually, it's the Catholics' choice. to judge Catholicism not on the basis of the words of the authorities, but rather by the tenets of the ideology itself. One of the tenets of Catholicism is that when the pope speaks ex cathedra (IIRC what the term is), he's infalliable. To me, looking at the pope as a representation of Catholicism is no less an ad hominem than when someone attempts to criticize atheism b…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 07:12 PM
9

I think the idea of "the movement as a whole" being pro or anti man or MRM is sort of nebulous and abstract. It's not nebulous or abstract at all. NOW is a very specific organization, and I made a specific accusation that they took a specific action. Nothing about that is vague. Nothing about that is individual opinion, it's something a large organization decided to do. According to NOW's website, they have "more than 500,000 contributing members" and "more than 500 local and campus affiliates i…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 12:13 AM
8

I'd actually flip your argument around. There are plenty of individual feminists who aren't anti-men or anti-MRA, but the movement as a whole is. I mean, it's kind of hard to argue that NOW is not representative of feminisim.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:01 PM
2

Didn't the article say that Man A can sue Man B for up to two year's child support? I can't find anything like that in the article. But this is the only thing I've read about it, so it's possible that's how the proposed law actually would work.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:01 AM
46

It isn't even saying that women can't fuck whoever they want and lie about it, it just says they can't do that for profit. And if they do, they can't keep the previous 2 years worth of stolen money.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:58 PM
57

During the hearing, he was denied access to medical reports detailing the victim’s injuries and wasn’t allowed to ask questions about her medical treatment That wouldn't be because there weren't any injuries, would it? one of alleged victim’s friends believed that her backwards blouse and hickey “indicated a non-consensual encounter.” LOL
/r/PussyPass02/09/16 02:53 PM
53

Oh, hey, that's a neat idea. Sort of a system for getting justice. We could call it the 'justice system'.
/r/PussyPass02/09/16 02:49 PM
3

Men, we want your curiosity, not your combativeness. Starting a conversation with the anti-male slur "mansplaining" is not an effective way to get what you say you want. By engaging us from a desire to out-debate us, outwit us, and beat us into submission, you’re already starting the interaction off on the wrong foot. No, you're starting things on the wrong foot by assuming that someone who disagrees or wants to debate is somehow trying to beat you into submission. Female subjugation is to our c…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:22 PM
1

I'm not. Why are you a male supremacist? Do you see the problem with your approach yet?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:11 AM
2

Why do you hate women so much, OP? Also, why are you such a piece of shit?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:06 AM
12

Suicide: their argument dodges the point made by MRAs, and doesn't even attempt to address it. Life Expectancy: their argument makes the bizarre assumption that life expectancy of men vs. women is set in stone and can't be changed by changes in healthcare spending. War: this paragraph is just a pile of nasty sexist crap. They start out by trivializing the victimization of men who are soldiers, then blame men for all war, then paint all men as rapists. They also try to debunk the idea that men ar…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 10:32 PM
2

"IT'S FAT HER'S DAY"
/r/MensRights20/08/16 09:05 AM
1

The problem isn't that it isn't a real phenomenon, or even that men don't do it more often that women. The problem is that it is a slur against an entire gender. Think of it this way. Stealing is a thing that happens. Black people, statistically speaking, steal more often than white people. If you were black and picked up somebody's pen because it looked interesting, not to steal it, just to look at it, and the guy said "Don't blacksteal my pen", how would you take it?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/16 08:17 AM
3

you aren't placing any blame on me without a fallacy I wasn't placing any blame on you. I was trying to show you that your trying to place blame on that other guy wasn't warranted.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:35 PM
1

what I said was in no way an argument, so if I actually meant it to be, I would be doing a really terrible job at it. While that's true, random people on the internet say things that are not actually arguments and do a terrible job of arguing their points all the time. he could have just asked "Are you implying that this is a bad thing?" That's not that different from what he did say. btw you'd think the name would have given it away CapitalJusticeWarrior? I have no idea what that means.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:25 PM
2

I think your brain might have been destroyed by the liberal media by being programed to analyze the metadata of statements (like how misogynist something is) rather than the content. I think you're reading too much into his statement. It was reasonable for him to assume that your original statement was made for some reason. Most likely, it would express agreement or disagreement to some extent, and some people would consider calling someone a right wing anarchist to be an insult. So, it isn't mu…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:58 PM
1

I still don't know what "reading people" are.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:03 PM
1

What's a "teddies reading people"?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:59 AM
1

A more reasonable way of saying what you meant to say would have been "That's not what I meant" instead of "That's not what I said".
/r/MensRights03/08/15 04:11 PM
0

It is zero if you don't actually want those things. While you're not actually wrong, that kind of cynicism kind of hurts to read. Better lobster once a day than canned tuna three times a day. The way I see it, the hooker's more like canned tuna and the loving girlfriend is more like lobster. Lobster most days beats canned tuna once a month.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:40 AM
2

Who said that? I didn't. Dude. That's a direct quote from the comment of yours that he responded to.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:33 AM
-4

It assumes that girlfriends are nagging embittered thieves, that prostitutes are near-supermodels, and that all most women have to offer is sex. It also assumes that the value added to sex by personal feelings and/or love is zero, and that getting laid once a month is plenty.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:29 AM
5

That's not what the guy said; he didn't mention gender at all. I don't really think the word "rape" ought to be used for consensual sex with 16/17 year olds, whether male or female.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 04:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter