TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BaddyRio Archive

View 6 posts and 206 comments by BaddyRio on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Because the moment men try to do that they are immediately labelled as misogynists?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 10:32 AM
3

because they approach appropriately due to having better social skills. Except this doesn’t explain why women like you complain about being approached in general as if its morally wrong for any man to do. You don’t say “I don’t want to be approached at all because most men don’t have adequate social skills” You simply say “I don’t want to be approached”, then conveniently are on with being approached when the man is attractive enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 10:26 PM
5

No. It’s easier for you to get sex from men you’re attracted to though. So it’s a privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 07:22 AM
1

just that a women-only society had already been built and it worked. It’s not a “women-only society” if men still help maintain it. You cannot be this stupid.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:37 PM
3

if a woman really wants you it's not real, she's just using you Didn’t say any of this. Go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 03:23 PM
19

That just means women are settling when it comes to looks lmao. That’s a lot of men who are in relationships with women who don’t even find them attractive. Poor bastards.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 02:56 PM
7

Haha I found the short guy with a little penis! Lol so much for being against “toxic masculinity”.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:01 AM
3

Edit: haha couple downvoters really fighting to refusing to Google lol it’s a definition lol go ooooooon, do it, give it a go haha but I know what page I’m on no biggie Because you think the definition of what a feminist is supposed to be means feminists can’t be sexist pieces of shit. This is like saying a priest who sexually assaulted a kid isn’t actually a priest because priests don’t do that.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:00 AM
3

Based.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:38 AM
3

What’s the point in “improving our genetics” if we run society into the ground in the process? A society full of sexually frustrated men sounds like a good society to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:23 PM
3

and the most successful societies seem to be the most intelligent ones And the most successful societies are also the ones that curbed female hypergamy the most. Female hypergamy was good for human evolution. It is not good for building and maintaining successful, stable and peaceful societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:17 PM
0

How about instead of committing a human rights violation, just get rid of the welfare state?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:08 PM
1

If the person you're with would make you question their loyalty or paternity of your child, why do you stay? Are you really so stupid that you don’t realise men who get tricked into raising kids that aren’t theirs trusted their partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 02:35 AM
1

Women CHOOSE to be poor and powerless, because they don’t biologically take “risks” right? True. That’s why women need affirmative action to keep up with men lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 12:34 AM
0

Lol. You people are so disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 12:06 AM
4

It’s hilarious how you people always go back to past discrimination as if it’s proof of it occurring today.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:44 PM
3

These campaigns only uplift and inspire certain people of colour that are deemed victims. Asians get screwed over by them because they’re “white adjacent” and too successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:43 PM
0

Were women and men today alive thousands of years ago? Wow I didn’t know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:24 PM
1

The sample size of single fathers, 18% is too small for it to be that relevant. No it isn’t. 18% isn’t the sample size. It is the percentage of the single parent population that are fathers. If it were 50/50 male/female for single parents then it could be compared. Demographics do not have to be the same size to compare life outcomes between them. By this logic we wouldn’t be able to compare the statistical differences in life outcomes between black and white people in the US because the black p…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:22 PM
1

It’s equivalent in purpose and intent Except it isn’t. If it was, men who want paternity tests wouldn’t just be asking for paternity tests. They would have been asking for all the examples you just gave, well before they ever ask for a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:14 PM
1

Ok so if she trusts but “wants to verify” like every year/every six months or whatever by going through your phone, requesting an STD panel, etc, would you believe it was her believing you may be cheating? How is asking for a few paternity tests over the course of several years equivalent to regularly asking your partner for several types of verification multiple times a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:12 PM
2

“Lol, my feelings are more important than my partners paternal certainty, so I’ll break up with him and make him pay child support”.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:53 AM
1

Ah yes, paternal certainty is so irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:43 AM
1

No it isn’t. Trusting someone cheated on you doesn’t mean they haven’t. You can believe your partner hasn’t cheated on you, but still want to make sure. Trust without verification is exactly how men get tricked into raising kids that aren’t theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:42 AM
0

I would cut my husband if he EVER asked for a paternity test. So your feelings are more important than your husband knowing for certain his children are his. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:32 AM
1

If we take a human that has a complex brain with emotions and thoughts, a bonobo model seems like a better society to live in. Peace and fun. Less infant deaths and female rapes would be a better structure for a human with complex brain ability. Rather have a society where people have sex for fun with each other and to resolve conflicts then fight all the time. Maybe then we could have even more cooperation and time for advancements to tools. Except we aren’t bonobos. They’re not even our closes…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:20 PM
2

Well this is happening more and more so.. No it isn’t. That's not how I'm acting. Yes it is. Women "choose" to stay home to take care of the children and home because society judges them as bad mothers and wives if they don't. Choices are not generally made in a vacuum. Men "choose" to work outside the home and earn money because society judges them as bad fathers and husbands if they don't. Ah yes it couldn’t be that these are things that men and women want to do in general. No, it’s because th…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:13 PM
1

I don’t know why a matriarchal society is considered less efficient than a patriarchal. Probably because there aren’t any prosperous and developed matriarchal societies. Chimpanzees have a patriarchy and they have higher rates of infanticide, rape, resolving conflict through aggression. Chimpanzees are also our closest relatives. You clearly underestimate how significant a factor biology is in human societies. Bonobos have a matriarchy and resolve conflicts through sex and have sex for fun livin…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:11 PM
3

Can you think of any reasons they might do that? Hint: it's not because women are lazy Because women don’t want to be breadwinners for their stay at home husband who looks after the kids. Stop acting like women have no control over their lives and everything they do is because of discrimination.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 11:38 AM
4

Women have every right to reject a man for any reason whatsoever. Because he’s ugly is reason enough. No one has to justify declining to listen to a sales pitch. Where did I say otherwise exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 10:23 PM
1

but don’t like the suggestion they aren’t physically appealing at all. Sure. I don’t see how this negates the point I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 10:21 PM
1

Probably a combination of both. How does this negate the point I made exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 10:20 PM
1

They would make negative comments about your height? Like what? If you don’t mind me asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 08:41 PM
3

Giving your wife a slap was legally sanctioned. Not killing her. You people really over blow how hard things were for women back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 07:17 PM
22

You wrote all this arguing against a point he didn’t make. He didn’t say you don’t have the right to reject men based on their looks. His point was that women say “don’t approach us”, as if it’s morally wrong and entitled to approach a woman in public, yet they will make exceptions for attractive men. Women don’t have a problem with being approached, they have a problem with being approached by men they’re not attracted to. Men know this and will continue to approach women in public. Get over it…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 06:29 PM
1

My bad my bad
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 02:05 AM
4

Did you have 300+ a year decades ago despite assault rifles being available to the public?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 11:58 PM
5

The UK literally had a mass shooting 10 months ago by a self professed incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 11:35 PM
1

Let them go then. I guess soon we will be saying men are the main ones on welfare since most want to opt out of society with zero to no income. Lol no. A society that creates “feral” men who have no direction in life is a society that will fall apart. You can’t just “let them go” without there being severe consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 10:17 PM
9

Privacy in a relationship is a complex topic. Both partner’s lives are intertwined and it’s expected that one may have to breach the other’s privacy for their sake. It’s unreasonable to expect that everything happening within the relationship stays within the relationship, that’s breeding ground for abuse. No. You’re just over complicating this and being obtuse for some strange reason. It’s pretty obvious no one is talking about situations where the relationship is toxic and potentially abusive.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/22 02:31 AM
4

That’s a privacy issue Which is what this post is about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/22 02:05 AM
3

Having this kind of conversations around a drink or a tabletop game, or in a group conversation feels acceptable to me. If he doesn’t want them to know, then no, it isn’t acceptable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/22 01:43 AM
6

“The problem is that not enough women run.” Lol they still blame men for that.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 02:12 PM
13

When do women ever put their bodies on their line and risk their lives to save male strangers exactly? I’ve heard of plenty men who do the same for women, and I’ve heard of plenty of men who have died for their troubles, like former Michigan State basketball star Adreian Payne, who was fatally shot while trying to prevent domestic dispute just last month. Why should men risk their lives for women who would never do the same for them?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 01:07 AM
7

And yet not every woman has debilitating periods, but these women will stake take this paid time off. Where is the equality in this exactly?
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:44 PM
5

this is LITERALLY no different from my male colleague who gets a bad migraine every so often bad enough he needs a sick day? A male colleague doesn’t get extra days off, on top of his paid sick days he’s already entitled to, specifically designated for his regular migraines.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:40 PM
7

And decades from now, those same women will still blame men for it.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:28 AM
15

And once again we have more deflection. As soon as I ask you for proof for your own claim, you get defensive and won’t provide it. Teachers 'give higher marks to girls' Boys Lag Behind: How Teachers’ Gender Biases Affect Student Achievement
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:26 AM
6

If a significant percentage of vegans were hunting animals, people would call them out on their hypocrisy. Saying “they’re not real vegans” wouldn’t address the problem. Stop with this “not real feminists crap”.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 04:57 AM
3

He probably means a woman he meets at a bar/club, so he’d be drunk too.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:13 PM
3

He probably means a woman he meets at a bar/club.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:12 PM
9

And lots of random feminists are ultimately just selfish idiots The annoying thing about this is that many of them are so self righteous and act like they’re moral arbiters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 04:26 PM
1

Men stare at you? What, do you want to make it illegal to look at people? This has actually been recently made a crime in the UK.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 11:27 PM
9

The men in that company better be getting paid extra for having to pick up the women’s slack then.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:34 PM
77

She thinks she’s big and powerful but it’s not a coincidence that she did this on his last day at that workplace. She’s a coward
/r/MensRights04/03/22 04:41 PM
4

otherwise, what term would you claim is the one that is for gender equality? Egalitarianism. You really aren’t off to a good start on your quest for “gender equality” when the name of your ideology is gendered. And feminism seldom does anything for men. And when it does, it isn’t done out of concern for men, it is done because it will benefit women. You can’t claim you’re for gender equality when you only focus on one gender.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 10:38 AM
1

Like which part of having a vulva or identifying as a woman dictates this. Literally no one said this. Stop putting words in peoples mouths. You act like it is impossible for the current social climate to prevent a significant amount of people of a particular group from seeing another groups perspective.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 10:27 AM
2

Those people close to you wouldn’t have died if it weren’t for the British holding onto Ireland. Get the fuck out of the country and no one dies.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/22 10:03 AM
7

Or we can just conscript no one at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 04:26 PM
16

Second, our duty as MEN is to provide and protect. We've upheld our duties for as long as we have lived as a species, and is the reason we continue to thrive today. Nah. If women don’t have to fulfil their traditional roles then we don’t either. I’m not being a work horse/wage slave/bodyguard for a woman who gets to be whatever she wants. Fuck outta here with that bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 07:19 PM
26

My god, just because he likes JBP, doesn’t mean he’s gone down a slippery slope towards a dangerous ideology. This hysteria over Peterson needs to stop lmao. 5 years later and it’s still happening.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/22 10:19 AM
11

Aha of course you boil it down to the most simplistic argument you can wrap your mind around. That is exactly what you have done by boiling this whole thing down to “men”. As though “men” all collectively have some sort of responsibility in the fact that “men” start wars. Because you’re too dumb to realise men are individuals.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:48 PM
12

Edit: Keep those downvotes coming boys – the fact that you downvote me even when I acknowledge that men are the primary victims of war tells me everything I need to know about your ideology. You’re getting downvoted because you’re too dumb to realise men are individuals and not a monolithic group who collectively decided to do everything together. Men can’t leave Donbas. They didn’t get a choice in that. But yeah according to your logic it’s their fault because men a fighting the war and men are…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:43 PM
3

I mean this is good advice, but wtf does this have to do with men’s rights lmao. Posting this here is only going to confirm people’s biases that we’re “misogynists and incels”.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 08:27 PM
7

I’m just adding an example on to your point about how feminists say women only do bad things because of male influence. Then I said the notion is insane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 04:32 PM
24

that women are influence by men to such an extent that women only do negative, harmful, destructive or even criminal acts only because of male influence. I’ve seen people say women compete with each other and are mean to each other because of men and patriarchy. It’s insane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 04:28 PM
2

Idgaf what your race is. The point is that the law legally applies regardless of race, it's not only white people who have to sign up for the draft to vote, it's any males. I didn’t say “only white people who have to sign up for the draft to vote”. What I said was an analogy. Do you know what an analogy is? Lmao you’re not very smart are you? None of what you said responds to my point. It clearly went way over your head. You said “men made that law” as if the law being made by men somehow makes …
/r/MensRights17/02/22 09:40 PM
4

Um... Men are the ones who made that law, Yes, men in power. Not the other 99.999% of men. It’s still misandry lmao. I’m black, if I was a dictator and made a law that only drafts black people into a war, is that not a racist law because it was made by a black person?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:53 PM
3

I don’t know if people also get drafted for non combat roles, but if they do, women should be drafted for those at the very least. If men have to serve their country to have the right to vote and have other privileges, so should women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 04:16 PM
9

Except men don’t get a choice in whether the child comes into existence or not. Why should men have to finance the consequence of a woman’s choice with her own body?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 04:13 PM
3

Those conservative beliefs are anti men, so holding them makes you not actually care about men's wellbeing. It doesn't matter if you think that they are good for men, they aren't. Ok sure, you can argue that in an objective sense. But you said this: It's not actually caring about the wellbeing of men. Which seems to say he doesn’t care about the well-being of men, he just wants them to fulfil their role. I'm not saying that he's malicious, I'm saying that he's wrong. You're assuming that these a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/22 06:58 AM
3

He has conservative beliefs. So he thinks men being providers is the best thing for men. You’re simply making assumptions that he doesn’t care about men’s wellbeing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/22 05:09 AM
2

You haven’t answered by what means a feminist minority is capable of turning the system on its head. Maybe if you’d actually read the links I put in my responses you wouldn’t be asking this question. Duluth model: “This experimental program, conducted in Duluth in 1981, coordinated the actions of a variety of agencies dealing with domestic conflict.” “The program has become a model for programs in other jurisdictions seeking to deal more effectively with domestic violence.” it seems to have been…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:28 AM
2

Who makes cops, mostly male, not take men who claim they are abused by women seriously? Cops don’t take men abused by women seriously because of the Duluth Model that feminists developed that says DV is patriarchal. Therefore feminists hold some level of responsibility for the problem. Surely it must be the feminist controlled criminal justice system which, big surprise, is also majority male? Be honest with yourself, does that square? Is it more likely that other men don’t take men’s claims of …
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:01 AM
1

I don’t really care that much about the joke itself, it’s the hypocrisy of these types of people that annoys me.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 03:24 AM
2

Nope, but the feminist cabal continues to lie about domestic abuse being patriarchal, causing male victims to be ignored and even be arrested when the call the police on their abuser. The feminist cabal continues to lie about rape stats, which show men are raped much more often than they have led people to believe. The feminist cabal continues to lie about how men like porn which depicts abuse, despite the fact that women are more likely to enjoy aggression in porn. The feminist cabal continues …
/r/MensRights15/02/22 03:21 AM
1

Thanks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 07:35 PM
2

Well white women are women, so they fall under the allegedly “oppressed” category.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 07:34 PM
8

as he's not very articulate Lol. What?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 04:17 PM
1

It has benefited more white women because there are more white women in the country, but it has benefited more black men and women per capita.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 03:32 AM
1

Could I get a link to that study if you can remember it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 11:00 AM
2

Studies show women are more prone to social desirability bias than men too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 03:03 AM
2

They sent you another link. You give no response. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:22 AM
2

Lol yes of course. We’ve all been world leaders making decisions for our countries. We’ve all decided the cultural norms that are put on us. Yes we simply do it to ourselves. It’s not like we’re individuals or anything. It’s not like women also enforce cultural norms or anything.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:58 AM
3

Selling your body for money that you need to survive is not a plus. Men don’t have this option. The fact that women choose to do this instead of sleeping on the streets like men clearly shows they find it preferable to sleeping on the streets. Women can sleep on the streets if they want to. But they choose not to. That is the point.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:44 AM
13

Compassion means actually doing something. Empathy just means feeling something. Virtue is hard. Virtue signaling is easy. Which is why men actually put themselves in danger to save strangers while women stand around and do nothing but scream at men to do something.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:08 PM
14

Not rape, but still wrong since she was in a position of authority over him.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:48 PM
5

It seems like you really don’t like women calling themselves ‘strong and independent’. We don’t care if you call yourselves that. What annoys us is you say you’re “strong and independent” while still expecting men to protect and rescue you. He probably wouldn’t have been attacked!! She probably wouldn’t have been attacked either. She got unlucky. Men are more likely to get attacked by strangers. Google it. So he should have walked her home and then put himself at risk by having to back to his ho…
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 01:51 AM
4

The man who wrote that story probably would’ve walked her home if she hadn’t said no to sex (as he said himself), Which is his right, he doesn’t owe her anything. You’re saying us women have to give you sex in return for you being a decent human being? Thank you for proving feminists right lmfao And when exactly have you ever gone out of your way to protect a man? Whenhen have you ever walked a man home? Drop the entitlement. It’s incredible how you women talk about “toxic masculinity” but when …
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 01:38 AM
7

And when have you gone out of your way to protect a man? Drop the entitlement.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 01:33 AM
2

Idk what kind of women are you sleeping with. You need to set the scene and take initiative. And what does she do? She doesn’t need to help me the scene? She doesn’t need to take initiative for her own orgasm? She doesn’t have to do anything, just lie there and enjoy the ride? Have you brought out toys or did anything that gives her pleasure? Yes. Im talking in general terms. Not necessarily specific to me. Why is it my responsibility to get toys? She can’t do that? Why wouldn’t you want your pa…
/r/MensRights06/02/22 01:17 AM
1

Sounds like you’re just mad at biology. Not mad, I just don’t understand how people can complain when they don’t even try and help themselves orgasm. There’s plenty women can do, and they don’t do it. They expect men to do all the work. That’s how sex works, but women don’t finish from 7 minutes. It’s just greedy to assume otherwise. While you’re done she’s got nothing to work with. So you admit it is easier for men to orgasm. Great. And this situation doesn’t just apply to men coming in 7 minut…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:17 PM
1

Sex is a two way street my guy. Otherwise your just masturbating with a persons body and that doesn’t make quality sex that women want Yes, it is supposed to be a two way street my guy. And yet straight women virtually do nothing in bed. They lie on their back or on their knees. That’s it. Which is why straight women need to take some more initiative in bed. Men are responsible for their own, so why shouldn’t women be responsible for their own? The most most women do for men in bed is simply all…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:17 PM
1

Yes, because it’s easier for men to orgasm. Women can literally lie there and do nothing and a man will orgasm easily. Maybe women should take some initiative. Communicate and maybe actually touch themselves and help themselves get there for once. Other than a woman allowing a man to put his dick in her, he is entirely responsible for his own orgasm. It’s time women take responsibility for theirs.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:50 PM
8

Men who rape their wives who currently can do it all they want. And women who rape their husbands can do it all they want. How are you not getting this? Are you stupid?
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:01 AM
2

Ah yes because evolution isn’t a thing.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:33 PM
2

Men (as well as women) crave male validation and would do anything to appear strong, ‘manly’ and superior to the male gaze. So let me get this straight. Men want to fuck women, yet they don’t care about female validation? Right, sure. The difference between me and you is what I’m saying is backed up by scientific research and what you’re saying is based on pure conjecture with no evidence other than your own anecdotes. Women also crave female validation, you women judge the fuck out of each othe…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:27 PM
2

Lol where did I try to make men the victims. I’m simply saying women have an effect on how society is built. Men didn’t set these standards of attractiveness. Evolution did. And evolution determined what women find attractive. Get this idea that we’re just blank slates and everything we do is the result of socialisation out of your head. Being a victim is so integral to your identity and world view, me simply challenging your ideas causes you to believe I’m playing victim lmao. We don’t all have…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:19 PM
2

Historically there have been nonbinary cultures and they did not have the same traditional roles or standards at all based on gender. Men and women were given a role for their strengths. Both men and women were assigned to fighting as well as childcare and every other role. There have also been matriarchal societies where women have been in charged and been the ones to call the shots in every area of life. And none of these societies or cultures have ever been as successful or innovative as the …
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:35 AM
3

Ah yes because what women find attractive in men has no effect at all. Women can’t think for themselves and what they find attractive in men is purely down to what us men tell them to find attractive in men. /s
/r/MensRights03/02/22 02:02 AM
7

So what you’re telling me is if it wasn’t for men and patriarchy, women would actually prefer to date and marry short, weak, fat, ugly, unconfident, broke men with no status? So what you’re telling me is, sexual selection, which is primarily driven by female sexual preferences and choice in certain characteristics in males, has had no effect on the biological and behavioural differences between men and women today? So what you’re telling me is that evolution has no role in the behaviours of men …
/r/MensRights03/02/22 02:01 AM
2

A really great example is men opposing social services and raising the minimum wage because they think that "weaker" people deserve to suffer, rather than the true masculine belief that true men help the most vulnerable among us. Lol this is such horse shit. There are valid reasons to be opposed to minimum wage simply for economic reasons not bullshit conjecture about masculinity. Here is a video of economist Thomas Sowell on the issue.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:44 AM
4

When the suffragettes campaigned for the vote in the US and UK, women were more opposed to women having the vote than men were.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:33 AM
9

Why are knee-jerk reactions based on engrained conditioning considered malicious as opposed to ignorant? Well for example, when we talk about men making up 75% of the suicides, you can almost guarantee someone butting in and saying “but women attempt suicide more”. They try to change the conversation to women because they attempt it more, despite the fact that men are actually dying more. I fail to see how trying to shift the conversation to a group of people who are dying less, isn’t malicious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 02:51 AM
1

Of course she doesn’t respond to this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 09:54 PM
3

Hey, you should read this subreddits mission statement to understand why it’s necessary for us to criticise feminism. We don’t have a problem with a movement that is just for women. What we have a problem with is the unfalsifiable ‘theory’ of patriarchy which has continued to negatively affect men through legislation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 09:43 PM
9

That's fair. But isn't that part of the question. Why do women feel this way? Them feeling this way isn't blatant maliciousness. It pretty much is. Advocating for men’s issues challenges their deeply engrained belief that women are the ultimate victims of society and are universally disadvantaged compared to men. So their knee jerk reaction is to think it’s “anti-women”. Also, a lot of these people are more concerned about blaming men than they are about helping women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 09:36 PM
3

Yes by one or two percentage points! If they actually become doctors. Groundbreaking right? since they do make up the majority of the population. That’s fair right? Nope you’re stupid and intellectually dishonest for complaining about sexism when the majority will be women in the field. What are you expecting exactly? The field to instantly become 50/50 men and women? It takes time to change. Stop being a dishonest whining baby, crying sexism because the demographics of the field hasn’t changed …
/r/MensRights01/02/22 08:16 PM
9

The comparison is also accurate. Your company or hospital isn’t gender equal if all the dudes are doctors and the receptionists are women. That’s called sexism. No it isnt. When women are majority of the doctors in the future you won’t be calling that sexism. Hypocrite. And thankfully the trend is changing. Because why wouldn’t we want more women to be doctors? I really don’t get yall. No one has a problem with more women being doctors. Stop misrepresenting people’s arguments you liar. The point…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 08:09 PM
8

I don’t know what point you’re trying to make honestly — yes, majority of new medical STUDENTS are women. Which means it will be a female dominated field in the future. Man you’re dumb lmao.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 08:05 PM
8

This just screams of a lot of "I haven't really talked to men about why they do this or what could contribute to this" and instead of an idea solely based on a female perspective that really hasn't done their research on what contributes to men or women for that manner acting out in violent fashions. Exactly. This whole narrative is pure conjecture.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:25 PM
2

12.1% are black. Your point still stands though.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:03 PM
7

The facts are that murder is mainly an intra racial crime. True. However with interracial crime, the facts are that today, black people kill more white people than vice versa. Significantly more. So going by your logic, why shouldn’t black people as a group apologise for that?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:55 PM
6

It’s not racist. It’s literally an analogy to show how ridiculous it is to hold people responsible for others behaviour.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:51 PM
1

You guys are in fact all white nationalists in this sub huh? I mean every time somebody brings up your own atrocities you downvote it to shit. No. I’m black. Now shut up.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:46 PM
10

Lmao
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:41 PM
4

bell hooks’ work is pretty much just non empirical social commentary and conjecture. Black men have been criticised her work for a long time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/22 03:35 PM
46

Lol no. These people are just stupid. They think “talking to your boys” is going to stop crazy bastards from randomly brutally murdering women in broad daylight.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:23 PM
14

From the extremely condescending article (I skipped over a few things): “Men, I get it. How do you take responsibility for a crime you didn’t commit, but someone of your gender did? It’s hard. I know. This is not about you. The same way a black person’s righteous rage may land in the body of a white person and trigger endless shame, it is not about the innocent white person and their offence at the accusation of privilege. It is about the black person who is humiliated and enraged at having to n…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 02:58 PM
17

I assure you that it wasn't all feminist. “I assure you that it wasn’t all men” Why is it women and feminists have a problem with “not all men” yet they are perfectly fine saying “not all feminists/they’re not real feminists”?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 12:04 PM
4

I think men are more likely to attack other men because it's seen as more socially acceptable. Boys are taught from a young age to not hit girls. What we should be telling boys is to not hurt anyone. Then it’s a men’s rights issue. Men are taught they’re more deserving of violence against them than women are. Internalised misandry. This is strongly linked with why men were historically the only ones drafted and still have to sign up for the draft in multiple countries. If the objectification of …
/r/MensRights20/01/22 11:11 PM
3

Why isn’t male violence a men’s rights issue when violent men disproportionately target other men? Why do you stop there and not ask yourself why do violent men prefer to attack other men?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:40 PM
2

They’re not saying it’s a-ok, but when the conversation about “male violence”, (which victimises more men than it does women) only happens when women are victimised, its clear they consider it less of a concern.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:12 PM
1

This article is about a viral tweet by a woman who said: “hi @TheAA_UK I am a lone woman whose car has broken down at night in the dark. Your call handler has told me you treat lone women and lone men as exactly the same priority in such circumstances because “that’s equality”. I am pretty sure that is not equality. I will now wait alone in the dark for 90 minutes or more, something which as a lone woman nowhere near home is far more anxiety-provoking than it would be for a man, if you follow th…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 08:21 PM
6

Lol exactly. “A system built by men, for men” they say. Yeah right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 11:38 AM
3

Things like this make me empathize less with victims because my empathy Same. With all the misandry that came about in the UK as a result of Sarah Everard’s murder I found myself not having as much empathy for her as I normally would for someone who suffered like that. The whole thing around her death just left a sour taste in my mouth. For the wrong reasons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 10:59 AM
13

Because violence only matters when the perpetrator and victim have different genitals /s
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:29 AM
3

A young woman from Ireland, 22 I think, murdered whilst she was out for a jog during daytime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 09:59 PM
5

True he said it was radical, but the problem is no one on the radio panel really opposed what he said. They didn’t really say anything against it. That’s what’s really worrying.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 06:18 PM
26

That’s exactly what happened. A Romanian man was arrested and people were generalising Romanians and talking about how lenient border control is. The same people generalising men were calling this racist and xenophobic, as they should. But the fact they can’t see their hypocrisy staring them in the face is incredible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:53 PM
44

This misandry and blaming of men as a group for violence is getting way out of hand now. A prominent advisor for covid regulations in Ireland suggesting a whole group of people having their freedoms restricted based on their immutable characteristics on national radio. Ridiculous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 04:47 PM
20

From the article: Comments made by Professor Sam McConkey on RTE radio where he suggested men should be required to have a license to enter ‘social spheres’ have created a storm of reaction on social media. Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1 with Brendan O’Connor on Sunday, McConkey, the well-known infectious diseases expert, said that Ashling Murphy’s killing “leaves us in speechless, cold, seething anger”. “My view is to be radical," he said. "You need 12 lessons to learn to drive a car. "You need a lice…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 04:45 PM
25

Before you know it there will be a social credit system for men lol. Idk why I’m saying lol. This shit is horrifying.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:23 PM
58

I remember. “Curfews”. Apply this logic to any race and they’d say “that’s different”.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:16 PM
81

Ok, this shit is getting out of hand now.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:45 AM
3

It is over the top. A man who’s not involved in crime was shot in his front garden in Dublin only about 3-4 days before Ashling was killed. There’s virtually no news on it and the president definitely won’t be at his funeral.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:40 AM
30

Straight out of the Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:46 AM
3

No worries
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:25 PM
12

Didn’t say it did. I’m pointing out the hypocrisy
/r/MensRights16/01/22 10:20 PM
1

Sure man. Everytime someone kills someone of a different race it’s racist too /s
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:49 PM
51

And yet a man is a misogynistic pig when he’s upset that his kid isn’t a boy.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 12:25 PM
95

So women are less likely to negotiate their salary and if they do, they ask for less. How is that anyone else’s fault?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:44 AM
21

Be misandry if it was a man. You'd have to have some contempt or disregard to kill anyone and they embody their own gender. Can't seperate that. Random acts of violence like this where innocent men get brutally murdered by violent men happens much more often. So at least you’re admitting here that violent men clearly have some sort of bias against their own gender. But if thats the case, where is the conversation about misandry? Where is the conversation about “male violence” whenever an innocen…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:39 AM
4

I feel like I'm gonna get hammered now for asking you this but.. isn't a man murdering a woman fundamentally misogynistic? That is ridiculous. Is it fundamentally racist for a white man to kill a black man?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:30 AM
3

They should be drafted, but for the sake of men’s lives, women shouldn’t be in combat roles.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:13 PM
140

Obviously it’s misogynistic every time a man kills a woman. Didn’t you know? /s
/r/MensRights15/01/22 09:49 PM
7

The point of all of this is - a person died. This shouldn't be something being debated and criticised on reddit. In other words, you can’t actually counter their point, so you make an appeal to emotion instead. “Why are you asking this question when a person died?”.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:23 PM
10

Little boys that go missing and/or get murdered don’t get anywhere near as much news coverage as Sarah Everard did. Not as much as any woman actually.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:14 PM
25

You didn’t explain anything. You just used his comment history to invalidate him. His comment history doesn’t make his question any less valid. Actually attack his point instead of his character or shut up.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:11 PM
1

If you can’t see the utility in figuring out the ways in which women are actually disadvantaged so that we can dismantle the idea of patriarchy, which is harmful to men’s rights, then that’s your problem. Edit: feminists idea of patriarchy is what stops progress on men’s rights.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 04:59 PM
6

Yeah but the issues that affect women are blown out of proportion or are just simply not true in mainstream media. I wouldn’t mind a discussion here about things that actually disadvantage women.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 04:29 AM
6

These same people virtue signalling, calling everyone racists and xenophobes will still continue to make the exact same generalisations about men. The hypocrisy is crazy. It’s staring them right in the face and they still can’t see it.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 01:20 AM
5

They’re doing that right now in Ireland. Random murder of a woman going for a jog and its somehow misogyny. I don’t get it.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:55 AM
13

They’re so deluded. “Only men do that” or “by other men” is such a common response from these people. Women can do no wrong in their eyes.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:52 AM
2

Not true. I’m critical of feminism because of him and here I am.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 12:41 AM
2

Being a tradcon means you don’t have principles and integrity? What?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 12:40 AM
4

Or maybe the women, you know the people who are actually married, could stay faithful? How about that? Women actually taking some responsibility for their actions instead of dodging it all the time and having retards like you absolving them of it.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 08:49 AM
4

The government can literally take your child away from you if they deem you an unfit parent, but paternity testing is government overreach now??
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:07 PM
9

They’ve been brainwashed by the industry into thinking they have to live up to all these standards for men to find them attractive. So they blame us.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:36 AM
26

No joke, I’ve had women/feminists tell me that what women find un/attractive is men’s fault “because men set the standard”… It’s never their fault lmao. No accountability.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:10 AM
26

This person doesn’t care that it’s negatively affected men for decades. Only that it’s negatively affecting this woman.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:03 AM
1

Yes but that information is not what I asked google for. I asked google for studies on how people have less empathy for men (disadvantage for men), and all it came up with is a way in which women are ‘better’ than men. That is my point when I say google is biased.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:48 AM
3

The thing I disliked about it was that it was framed in a way that implies men are safe when they walk the streets at night. They’re not. Statistically men are in greater danger of violence. And when you point that out women get so offended. It’s like they’re enjoy being a victim or their entire identities revolve around being victims.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:23 AM
6

If at any point they're backed into a corner during a discussion and can't deny the disadvantages, the second haphazard cognitive barrier that they throw up is just to claim that it's not their fault and not their problem and it's just all men doing it to men and thus they don't have any responsibility to intervene. Then over time, after the offending discussion is over, they are capable of mentally modulating right back to a comfortable state of straight-up denial or simple lack of awareness of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 09:38 AM
10

It has always been a cult and never been about facts.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 08:30 AM
10

What’s annoying about this is many women and feminists won’t acknowledge how women can easily take advantage of the system like this. It’s like they think if they acknowledge it, it somehow delegitimises real female victims.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:50 AM
1

I agree. It’s just annoying that if we do that, we will just get shouted down for being “misogynists”.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:21 AM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:12 AM
3

Thanks
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:12 AM
57

Because “it’s just different” when a woman does it to a boy. The boys “want it”. The logic is stupid. There are teenage girls who get taken advantage of by grown men and some of those girls “want it” and “enjoy it”. But we don’t use that to justify it, because it still doesn’t make it ok. The hypocrisy of these weirdos pisses me off so much.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:07 AM
112

The mental gymnastics people do to excuse women of their abhorrent behaviour never ceases to simultaneously amaze and disgust me.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 02:58 AM
2

Lol facts. I’ve seen women feel bad about NOT getting catcalled. They know other women don’t like it, but they feel like shit because they feel they must not be attractive enough to get cat called.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:23 PM
4

We have to be the change ourselves. We can raise our sons and daughters to value themselves and each other and be empathetic towards both men and women.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:40 AM
18

I tried searching for the studies that show that people have less empathy for men than women, and all google came up with is articles saying women are more empathetic than men lmao. Google is so biased it’s a joke.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:38 AM
5

Sorry that happened to you. I Hope you can move past it one day.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 09:43 AM
16

There are men and women like this. Women just don’t get talked about because women who feel entitled to men’s bodies aren’t called out. By anyone.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 09:27 AM
5

It wouldn’t surprise me if a lot of feminists in academia know it’s a load of horse shit. But they’ve built their careers on this horse shit and it puts a roof over the heads and food on the table. And they would be way too embarrassed to admit how wrong they are. So they double down and they continue publishing their horse shit papers
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/22 08:42 AM
6

• ⁠Ans#1 Women are by nature more benevolent and therefore, Queens Would've created a Uptopian Society, in Fact Women are so angelic that, without evil men's influence, they could raise boys to be less evil, and that's exactly why most male criminals were raised by single mothers. Oh wait... I find it ironic how feminists complain how women do the majority of the child rearing, yet solely blame men for how boys are socialised. Apparently mothers have no influence on their sons behaviour and beli…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/22 08:12 AM
1

Soon men will start writing books on feminists and feminist extremists as the men's movement hits mainstream. Already happening in the black community. “Black male studies” rejects the characterisations of black men, black feminists have made.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 08:26 PM
1

Women have a plethora of options. The pill, female condoms, IUD, contraceptive implant, plan B and abortions. There is literally no excuse for them. It’s not just your body, your choice during pregnancy, it’s your body, your choice before pregnancy too. Your uterus, your responsibility.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 07:57 PM
40

Women are just as morally corrupt. They just don’t seem to be as willing to get their hands dirty as men are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 07:15 PM
8

I don’t think a guy should have to sign a contract before hand, but your opinion is much better than people who say “no not at all” at least. Also places where abortion isnt legal niether shoup paper abortion. I agree.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:54 AM
13

Yep. Criticism of behaviour that is more common in men as a group is ok. But criticism of behaviour that is more common in women is misogyny and inceldom because women are angels and aren’t a monolith. Shit is annoying.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:52 AM
12

If men get no say in abortion because it is about a woman’s personal choice with her body, then a man shouldn’t have to finance a woman’s personal choice with her body. Men should be able to relinquish their parental responsibilities within a given amount of time of being informed of the pregnancy. And before you say, “he should’ve kept it in his pants”, the same thing can be said to women. Women can refuse to have sex just like men can.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:46 AM
1

How do you feel about ‘paper abortion’?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:42 AM
10

Jesus. I’m of the opinion that sometimes violence is necessary when a group of people are actually oppressed, e.g. slaves, colonised people like the Irish. But women as a group, especially in western countries or Australia are nowhere near in the position where violence is justified and one of them brought up slave rebellions is ridiculous. The fact that they think women have been essentially been their husbands slaves for 1000s of years is so ahistorical it’s not even funny. These people are de…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:11 AM
1

You're... angry that movement dedicated to discussing womens issues isnt all that interested in talking about mens issues? Where in my comment did I say any of this? When people have advocated for spaces and funding for men issues, feminists have campaigned against them. The link I commented shows multiple examples of that. That is the problem. There’s no way you don’t understand this, you’re just being wilfully obtuse.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:43 PM
1

No, I’m angry that there are many people in this movement that have gone out of their way to stop initiatives that would help men. Did you even click on the link? The dishonesty from you is crazy
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:39 PM
1

It doesn’t need to be an all encompassing ideology. The fact feminists believe we live in their definition of a patriarchy is all I need to know it’s a false ideology.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:39 PM
1

Yes there are a lot of different feminists. But as men, the people you determine the problem, it’s quite annoying to hear contradictory messages about what’s misogynistic and what’s not.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:37 PM
1

Feminism is a movement for women. Hence the term feminism. Nobody is going to deny that its literally the basis of the entire movement. And here is the problem with feminists. You all contradict each other. You can’t come to a consensus on anything other than “men bad”. Many many many feminists say “feminism is for men too”. That’s the entire reason why r/menslib exists. It’s a feminist sub for men. Make your minds up.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:20 AM
1

mens voices are heard plenty, i assure you. Lol nice joke. https://www.instagram.com/p/CWA82YPNLLi/?utm_medium=copy_link We don’t need feminists to shift their entire narrative. We need feminists to stop silencing us whenever we talk about something that isn’t an already approved feminist talking point about men’s issues.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:18 AM
1

We understand what toxic masculinity is. And we think it’s a bullshit term that puts all the responsibility on men for the encouragement of toxic standards of men and completely ignore how women encourage it (let me guess, you believe they don’t). Yet toxic expectations of women are called misogyny or internalised misogyny and not toxic femininity, which of course is to put all the blame on men again (because somehow even if a woman holds these beliefs, it’s still somehow men’s fault). If we’re …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:30 AM
1

They always talk about masculinity in a negative light and they somehow expect men to be on board with that and not feel negatively about it ever. “Toxic masculinity” implies there is a “positive masculinity” yet they never, ever talk about it. Ask them what positive masculinity is and they won’t be able to tell you
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:23 AM
5

This is a great way of summarising the problem
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:40 AM
19

The problem is they equate feminists to women. They see criticism of feminism as an attack on women.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:36 AM
11

Well considering that the CDC’s NISVS reports show that when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011), and that the majority of these men only reported female perpetrators, those women’s friends are rapists too going by their logic.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:17 AM
7

It’s got to the point that just disagreeing with a woman and explaining your viewpoint is mansplaining now.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:02 AM
2

Notice how they call women’s issues the result of misogyny and not toxic femininity, despite the fact that calling it “toxic femininity” makes sense when you apply their logic. They’ve called misandry, toxic masculinity on purpose to put 100% of the responsibility on men.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 05:59 AM
32

It’s the hypocrisy that pisses me off. Not the touching itself. They have no self awareness.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:41 AM
1

What else did you mean by essentialism? Unless my understanding of the word is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 11:07 AM
0

Are they? Yes. Men commit the most murders. Why is that hard to believe? Males across many species, including apes, are more violent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 11:05 AM
0

I’m not gonna lie I find it hard to believe the reason men are more violent on average is simply down to gender roles and socialisation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 09:34 AM
4

I struggle with social anxiety so lockdowns and isolations have just caused me to go back into my shell. Having social anxiety as a man sucks when you’re expected to be confident and assertive all the time. I hate it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 09:20 AM
3

The only way “patriarchy” would be over is if women dominated every part of life like how they claim men currently do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 08:45 AM
1

Good Bot
/r/MensRights31/12/21 01:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter