TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KochiraJin Archive

View 0 posts and 2,290 comments by KochiraJin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,290 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Well, if you don't want to defend your theories so be it. That's not going to convince me of their validity though. What I don't appreciate is you putting words in my mouth. I never said women are the root of all evil and don't even know where you got that. Please try to understand what people say rather than creating a strawman in your head.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 10:59 AM
6

All I'm getting out of this is that patriarchy is so ill-defined that it has to turn to other systems for explanations any that you're all doom and gloom about climate change.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 10:30 AM
7

So define a system, then if it's the boogeyman. Then all systems are the boogeyman. This doesn't logically follow. Just because one system is an ill-defined boogeyman, doesn't mean all of them are. Economic systems like capitalism and socialism or governance systems like democracy or monarchy are all well defined. They aren't described by meaningless terms like "the system we live under" or "is designed to both benefit and disadvantage men". A deconstruction of the patriarchy is not the disregar…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 10:10 AM
1

Disparate impact standards create primary and secondary discrimination. The primary discrimination is in policies such as that lower standard for women in the marines you mentioned, while the secondary discrimination happens when people notice that those lower standards produce lower quality applicants and start assuming that such people are only there to meet the standard. It's a shit policy that assumes that the only reason for different outcomes is discrimination and fails in it's goal becaus…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 05:16 AM
2

The sad part is writing laws to fix this is very simple. Just don't make the punishments for crimes variable.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 03:10 AM
1

Given how popular BDSM and other such smut is with women it's no surprise that the feminism that can co-exist with it would win out.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 04:20 AM
11

They're conflating the general sexual misconduct stats with the intimate partner stats. The study cited says nothing about sex of perpetrators of intimate partner violence.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 07:23 AM
1

It's a state propaganda network what do you expect?
/r/MensRights10/07/26 05:56 AM
1

I disagree. The feminists push their narrative to gain power, while the corpos ally with them to stifle the competition. The regulations feminists push for to enforce their vision of equality hurt small businesses much more than the big corpos.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 04:46 AM
1

Most women on OF don't get rich though.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 02:26 AM
7

That pro tip isn't just with regards to stand your ground laws. Even if they go to prison that's not going to make you less dead.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 06:41 AM
1

From what I've heard the extra information from the book doesn't make the management look more competent. The two crew fucking each other implies that they're a poor judge of character in addition to not doing the sensible thing and keeping them separated. As for forcing the main character, the issue really isn't his qualifications. It that forcing him can scuttle the mission all on it's own. They basically gambled on the guy they decided to kill would still be willing to save them. That's a pre…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:29 AM
3

That's a weaselly way of measuring how much people prioritize others. You could support the opposite conclusion just by pointing out how the earnings and consumer spending gaps show men earning more while women spend more. Academia is biased in favor of the feminist world view. You really have to look at their work skeptically to avoid being misled.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 02:44 AM
2

It was actually a 2020 order that was overridden in 2024 by Biden. Biden's order was subsequently thrown out by the courts and we're back to the 2020 rules. This is the overview that was linked in a letter to collages about current policy.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 02:31 AM
3

I'm in college. The title IX is not that way for me. But maybe I'm wrong can you expand on that? Trump actually fixed that via executive order. It's an issue that tends to flip-flop depending on who is in the white house. The issue is when a "believe women" type of policy is allowed rather than adversarial approach that mimics how the courts handle things.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 01:16 AM
1

Yea, it's new and powerful, but management knew that. So why would they put mission critical personnel anywhere near the experiments? Or if one of them just had to be present for some inexplicable reason, why have the backup hang around to get caught up in a potential accident? They utterly failed to properly manage these risks and as a result lost both their primary and backup biologists. Whet else would you call management that jeopardizes the mission due to their own failings other than incom…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:13 AM
4

The economic argument kinda falls flat when you realize the baby boom started during the great depression.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:51 AM
13

I think you misread that. It was the Swedish troops who protected the 3 women along with other civilians. Whereas Dutch troops were the ones who sat on their hands for the mass execution of men and boys. The article is specifically about this contrast in following their orders.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 09:56 AM
8

That's only true if sperm is the only thing men bring to the equation. Also keep in mind that having the baby is only the start. The have to reach the age where they have children of their own for this to confer a biological advantage. Your analysis is way too simplistic and the conclusion runs counter to the wide spread success of monogamy observed in human history.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 09:33 AM
4

Well, the patriarchy "exists" in the bonds between men, so if you want to smash the patriarchy you have to go where men form those bonds. Hence why feminists are so insistent on getting on getting women in there to disrupt the bonding. There's also tomboys who are genuinely interested in the hobbies these communities form around. They aren't really a problem but can be hard to differentiate from the feminists. That's one of the reasons the can get flack when joining a new community.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:31 AM
8

I expect that some people like to keep the draft discussion Americancentric simply due to how little of an issue it is there. While the laws are discriminatory, the large professional military makes the use of those laws highly unlikely. It's a great situation to point to if your goal is to minimize the issue.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 06:43 AM
34

I'm aware as males we've done terrible things in the past, I wont neglect that, I'm fine with feminism. You really shouldn't think that way. You are not responsible for the sins of every man who ever existed. The fact that feminism has taught you this is atrocious.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 06:59 AM
3

Sounds like he believed in a unique derivative of communism. Which would explain the violence. Communists were very fond of violence for political ends historically.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 03:34 AM
3

That ship sailed when feminists decided to terrorize Erin Pizzey out of her country for having the gall to notice that a lot of women in her domestic abuse shelter were abusive themselves.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 03:02 AM
8

What laws force women to get pregnant?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:13 AM
1

So management was both unable to prevent mission critical personnel from conducting unnecessary and risky experiments, while also being unable to keep the backup from hanging around the primary crew, and this is somehow not incompetence? Their setup didn't even need something as flashy as an explosion to screw them over. Something contagious like the common cold would have done just as well. On top of that their "solution" to this mess of their own making is to give their mission critical replac…
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:20 AM
2

Actually we are talking about how that project's management was so incompetent they had to force a guy on a suicide mission to cover their mistake.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:22 AM
2

The bacteria was not anyone's fault. Sure, but having both the primary crew member and their backup in the same place to be blown up in an accident certainly is.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 05:43 AM
4

I don't see what's offensive about limiting top level comments in that context. The askwomen subreddit is presumably a place where people ask questions for women to answer, a rule limiting those answers to women seems pretty reasonable. It's not like that rule is preventing men from asking questions or discussing answers. Although, knowing reddit there's probably bias in the moderation elsewhere. Honestly, if the rule is too much then the whole sub is as well, as it's just enforcing the sub's wh…
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:55 AM
1

Something you have to remember about equality in this context is that it's a value judgment. And everyone has their own individual values. So when feminists say they are for equality there is no guarantee that they mean the same thing you do. It's pretty popular among left wing ideologies to value the outcome over the process, so you get an "ends justify the means" type of thinking. Under that kind of value system you could look at an inequity such as the wage gap and "fix" it by discriminating …
/r/MensRights17/06/26 12:00 PM
3

Well if you've got no solutions why bother bringing up biological differences at all?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:20 AM
3

What do you mean? Are you saying that men don't choose their profession?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:15 AM
3

Yea, and what would you do about that? Change biology? force society to conform to what you deem an appropriate job distribution?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:07 AM
2

Life expectancy differs between men and women for a lot of the same reasons there's an earnings gap. It stands to reason that if this is a problem then that should also be considered a problem. The issue I have is that these reasons are largely down to individuals choices. If a man chooses a more risky profession on his own, how is he a victim?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 06:34 AM
1

The mainstream media by and large is a government and corporate psyop that manufacturers the narrative that black people are victims of brutality where the opposite is true. I disagree. Black people are the victims of brutality. The FBI stats support this. The majority of those black murderers' victims were other black people. You are correct that a lot of media outlets deceptively gloss over this problem though.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 05:47 AM
7

Another thing to consider in your analysis is that most of those violent criminals are convicted of being violent against other men. A lot of them wont be a threat to women simply because the "don't hit women" conditioning stuck. Who is targeted matters in a threat assessment.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 05:24 AM
1

Did you perhaps miss the part where I said that equality of outcome is a stupid policy? Equality isn't inherently good and the idea that it is has gotten us quite a few policies based on equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 07:06 AM
-1

Right, so equality is not when people are equal. Yea, still sounds stupid to me. Do you think equality can't be applied to any trait other than the ones you think are good or something? Your collectivist accusations and comments on intelligence and imagination are really barking up the wrong tree. I started this conversation by calling this form of equality stupid after all. Also fun fact, one definition of equity is "fairness or justice in the way people are treated" You were complaining about …
/r/MensRights11/06/26 03:28 AM
1

Sure, those criticisms are some of the reasons I think it's stupid to implement, but they don't negate the fact that it is a form of equality. The boards are equal in the end are they not?
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:40 AM
-2

Actually I keep bringing up equal outcomes. You can call that equity if you want but that doesn't change the fact that it's a type of equality. The concept doesn't change just because you use a different word for it.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:14 AM
-1

Preferential treatment isn't a form of equality. It's one of the means to bring about equal outcomes, which is the equality people are having trouble understanding. Maybe a physical analogy would help. Imagine you have a set of boards of various lengths. To make them all equal in length you'd have to cut off a different amount from each board. While each cut is different, the resulting boards are equal.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:08 AM
-3

I'm pretty sure you keep bringing up equity because saying "equal outcomes aren't equality" sounds really stupid.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 05:50 AM
2

Was it women pushing for them or feminists? While there is a lot of overlap those groups are not the same.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:16 AM
-4

Did you just stop reading after the first sentence or something? I'm well aware that there are multiple forms of equality. Explaining one does not disprove the existence of others.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:13 AM
-6

Equal outcomes is certainly a form of equality. Another would be equal treatment under the law. Both fit under the concept of equality even though they are incompatible with one another. The conflation of words doesn't help, but the core issue is equality is a more complex topic than people typically treat it.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:52 AM
3

Was it women pushing for them or feminists? While there is a lot of overlap those groups are not the same.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 01:56 AM
-3

What happened to equality? Why does one group receive preferential treatment and not the other? You can easily justify preferential treatment using equality just by looking at outcomes. It's stupid to do so but it justifies giving some people more power or resources so you can see why people would do so.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 01:45 AM
6

"The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Feminism's sexist streak has been there from the begging. You can also look at their early successes and how the weren't really equal. Things like gaining the vote without the draft, swapping child custody from the father to the mother in a divorce, and especially their early work on domestic violence all produced u…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 06:13 AM
2

Last I checked most women don't live in Afghanistan. It's pretty disgusting to use someone else's suffering to pretend to be more of a victim.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 05:38 AM
1

Alpha and beta seem similar in nature to masculine and feminine. They're all basically lists of traits and actions that convey a type of perception in others. In that sense you could have an alpha man in the same way you can have a masculine man. It's not an accurate picture of a person but more of a stereotype based on limited interactions. They two systems of thinking seems related to levels of thinking. The systems are looking at thought from a biological perspective while levels look at it f…
/r/MensRights18/05/26 11:45 PM
3

No, A is correct according to the article. They cite a study with this outcome in mice. What their findings suggest is that humans react differently than other animals in this case.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 10:42 PM
2

This study give an estimate of 37% of the male population being circumcised. From there it's just a matter of looking up the male population (IIRC I used 2016 data) and doing some simple math. Also you should throw out the FGM type incidence stats on the grounds of "Caution is advised when interpreting these findings because data completeness is often low and varies by submitter." That's not an accurate measure of FGM.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 12:56 AM
4

we should not do any genital mutilation to anyone, but women's genital mutilation I believe carries a heavier connotation, because it actually happens to a horrific degree to this day compared to men's (unless one is an intactivist in which case they woud argue otherwise, but even then circumsicion is not comparable to fgm). A pinprick counts as FGM. That's way less destructive than circumcision. If you want to talk prevalence then you're looking at 1.4 billion circumcised men and boys versus 23…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:30 AM
1

California democrats tried to repeal the state's anti-discrimination law so they could legally discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 02:35 AM
1

One of the long term studies on the outcomes of transgender people getting treatment found that they have a male pattern of criminality. The data that is the basis for men's inherent violence, is also found in trans people.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 06:40 AM
26

we seem to live in a world where people (and courts) think working in a grocery store deserves the same pay as working in a warehouse. This is just the labor theory of value. It's communist nonsense. Anyone who thinks this doesn't understand basic economics.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 09:28 AM
5

That's just being a monk.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 01:35 AM
2

The fact that rape fantasies are common among women is a great example of this. No one is going to argue that such women want to be raped.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 10:55 PM
2

Why do you believe that? In my experience they're some of the first people to break out the pitchforks and torches when they think children are being harmed. It's one of the main reasons they're often against transitioning children.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:44 AM
4

Abortion is widely stigmatized because it kills the baby. The anti-abortion people are very clear about that.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:00 AM
3

You should have a short summary of what the case is about. Not everyone is going to know that it's challenging unequal protection from genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:25 AM
1

Apparently 40.4% of the left of center group found at least some justification for the murder of Mamdani.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:55 AM
1

It's actually a series of studies mandated by the prison rape elimination act. All are publicly available. You can look at this one for example. The relevant stat is in Table 2 which is on page 4. If you want to sift through the older surveys and related publications you can find them here.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:17 PM
10

The female prisons are actually worse according to the PREA data. Although that's limited to sexual misconduct.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:52 AM
5

Buying a service isn't buying a person. You could sub the groceries with a massage or fixing a sink and it would make no difference to the point. Being paid to convince you to do a service does not make you a slave. Quite the opposite really.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:59 AM
6

The decision is influenced by money, that’s what coercion is. If that's what coercion is then buying groceries definitely qualifies. The money you pay certainly influences their decision to give you food. She would not have had sex except for the money. And? Why is she incapable of making her own financial transactions?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:49 AM
4

both are willingly sold for money by rational adults. Are women unable to make such decisions about what they do with their bodies?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:37 AM
5

Also, paid sex is financial coercion and therefore rape. Do you financially coerce the grocery store to steal food from them too?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:31 AM
-1

The draft is immoral, but you can't realistically get rid of it because peacetime draft laws don't survive contact with the enemy. Ukraine is a good example, before the invasion they were planning to eliminate the draft but we can see how that's going.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 01:11 AM
2

Personally, I think the terrorism is a better example of how shit early feminists were. IIRC it only stopped due to the outbreak of WWI.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 07:52 AM
18

They found 24,000 Spanish and Italian speaking bad apples. A quick search finds that there are about 519 million people who natively speak Spanish and about 63 million for Italian, half of which would be male resulting in a total of 291 million in this category. A bit of math and you get 0.008% of these men were found to be bad apples. Certainly such people should be punished, but it's important to keep in mind the magnitude of the problem.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 04:34 AM
6

It's systemic because that makes the problem sound worse than it actually is.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 04:03 AM
13

Someone forgot maid services exist.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 11:43 PM
9

How can feminists manipulate men? Your argument doesn't make sense. I don't really understand what you are trying to say. A good chunk of feminists are men. Did you perhaps mean women instead of feminists? Also why would they need to manipulate men to fearmonger women? The anti-vaxers fearmonger about vaccines all the time. That doesn't require a manipulation of those vaccines. Not as much as women, just look at the statistics. I have looked. Victims of violence are overwhelmingly male. Even if …
/r/MensRights31/03/26 12:07 AM
8

It's really common for evil people to believe they are the good guys. If you actually look at why the communists and nazis killed people you'd find that they have "good" intentions as well. Turns out people can justify a lot when the supposed outcome is a utopia, but the good never comes to fruition because their philosophy isn't based in reality.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 11:34 PM
19

why are women always afraid to go out? Feminist fearmongering. Why have they already experienced verbal or physical (sexual) assault, or heard about it from a friend? It's the same for men. Why are thousands of women killed every day? There's over 3 billion of them.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 11:19 PM
1

I disagree on your view of monopolies, but I was thinking of the patent system when I wrote that. It's the big reason insulin is so expensive. That part is undeniably government mandated.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 01:08 AM
1

The US hasn't had capitalist health care for quite some time. It's the tangled mess of regulation and government granted monopolies that push the costs so high. Probably a bunch of corruption in there too.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 07:24 AM
2

Mao and Stalin are what communism leads to. There is no utopia at the end of that road.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 06:57 AM
11

Why should someone reject traits they have just because they are associated with males?
/r/MensRights19/03/26 06:34 AM
1

The US created the conditions that render the draft unnecessary. Mostly due to all that military spending people like to complain about. If that were to change, the draft would return as soon as the government thinks it needs one.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:11 AM
1

My point is that the association is understandable when you take queer theory into account.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 12:42 AM
1

Basically they're just asking how you know something is equitable. The dictionary definition of that word doesn't reflect it typical usage because a wide variety of socialists like to misuse it to make their ideas sound better than they actually are,
/r/MensRights16/03/26 05:40 AM
2

Not ruling things out is typical for the Trump administration. Strategic ambiguity is often useful. In this case I doubt there will be a draft in the foreseeable future. That large defense budget means the US has a formidable professional military already. If they can't get the job done what would you expect a bunch of randos with the bare minimum of training and no morale to accomplish?
/r/MensRights16/03/26 05:16 AM
2

I think the DOGE guys are a bad example. Even if they were perfectly eloquent, the left would smear them in some manner simply because they are on the "wrong" side.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:44 AM
30

I get where you're coming from, but it's more important for paramedics to triage based on need. I don't want them trying to figure out who is more worthy of treatment when they should be maximizing the number of lives saved.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:28 AM
5

It's weird that the whole poly thing is associated with liberals/progressives even though it usually presents as one individual clearly being the center/leader of the polycule with a harem It comes from queer theory, which is all about breaking down the taboos around sexual relationships.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:02 AM
2

The full context of the bill shows it's a broad small-business enhancement program not a targeted handout or exclusion based solely on race or gender. If that's the case why are race and sex included at all? It's completely unnecessary to help small businesses. Any small businesses that happen to be owned by women and minorities would still be covered under a sex and race neutral policy. "Small businesses" and "microbusinesses" come first and are race or gender neutral. No immutable characterist…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 12:23 AM
6

Didn't they move on to minotaurs and dragons?
/r/MensRights11/03/26 09:35 PM
11

Really that's just a more narrow version of "actions speak louder than words". Which is good advice in general.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 09:31 PM
1

Turns out I was right to be suspicious § 2.2-1618. Division of Procurement Enhancement created. The Division of Procurement Enhancement (the Division) is hereby created within the Department. The purpose of the Division shall be to collaborate with the Department of General Services, the Virginia Information Technologies Agency, the Department of Transportation, the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, and covered institutions to further the Commonwealth's efforts to meet the goals es…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 09:23 PM
5

Why would you trust someone who separates small women owned and small minority owned businesses into separate categories from small businesses to avoid favoring businesses based on race or sex?
/r/MensRights11/03/26 01:37 AM
12

The sentencing part of the issue is actually rather simple to fix. Just need non-variable sentences for crimes. Anyone who is convicted would get the same punishment.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 12:23 AM
2

No I'm not. The theory itself is flawed. It starts from the premise that men oppress women and works to prove that.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:38 AM
3

At its core, feminism is an ideological and theoretical framework that draws upon psychology, sociology and history to understand gender inequality within society. Feminism hinders our ability to understand gender inequity though. The movement actively resists data that suggests parity in issues they've decided are women's, and will cherry pick or lie to make those issues seem worse than they are.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 04:58 AM
7

This is kinda old news. The study was done in 2014. Would be interesting to see a more up to date version. The surveys it's pulling data from are done periodically so they could look at trends over time as well.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:46 AM
15

Yet they can police people like Casey Jaye for having the audacity to look at the suffering of men.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:32 AM
10

So what? Being raped is a common sexual fantasy among women and is featured in plenty of the erotica they consume. Are you now going to argue that it's common for women to want to be raped? Personally, I think that's absurd. Fantasy is not reality.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 01:35 AM
2

From the table it was fairly easy to find the paper it came from. I don't think this is strong evidence one way or another on the prevalence of people engaged in pedo or hebephillia. The survey wasn't set up well to measure that. The results are interesting though and would be justification for more targeted research.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 03:52 AM
1

Demographics are the most likely culprit. The complaints mostly come from them simply because there's more of them in the places you're looking.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:15 AM
1

What's stopping them? The source of these claims is the publicly available investigation files. Should be rather trivial to link the relevant documents.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 12:26 AM
11

Why do I have to present proof but they don't?
/r/MensRights16/02/26 09:29 AM
14

Why do you believe that ALL of them are lying for no reason? Social clout is a potential reason for them to lie about being victimized. These types of accusations are easy to do and carry almost no risk.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 05:43 AM
18

Given the extensive nature of the files it would make more sense those making accusations of wrongdoing to cite the sources of their suspicion. Most people don't have time to sift through hundreds or thousands of documents.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 05:38 AM
38

Too many people are operating on the assumption that being in the files means being involved in Epstein's crimes. Partisan shit stirrers are using this to smear their political opponents. In reality there's a ton of reasons someones name would come up in the files unrelated to the crimes.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 02:02 AM
1

What makes you think I'm advocating for that?
/r/MensRights12/02/26 02:15 AM
2

Most men don't slap women's butts either. Does that make your anger at such cases fake?
/r/MensRights12/02/26 02:14 AM
2

Yes, false rape accusations are a serious matter. Is "I was falsely accused of molesting someone" handled with the same seriousness as "I was molested by someone"?
/r/MensRights12/02/26 01:13 AM
2

The 4th amendment is part of the US constitution. It's basically a top level law that protects the people against unreasonable search and seizures. SCROTUS is is probably referring to the supreme court of the united states, which is often abbreviated as SCOTUS.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 12:21 AM
0

Isn't misgendering people illegal in Canada?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 11:37 PM
3

I don't want to speak for Indian men, but criminal accusations are a serious matter and determining the truth is the most important thing to do. As such it's important to not take the victim at their word and instead work to verify their claims. If people don't do this you end up with the problem you are pointing to now.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 11:11 PM
1

Not a "gatcha" just wondering if there was a reason for saying something stupid. If I was going for gotchas I'd be applying your logic to men.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 10:59 PM
5

It's possible for women to be victims of molestation and for men to be victims of false accusations. The two are not mutually exclusive. Is it really surprising that high levels of crime would have have a negative affect on people who are not victims of it directly?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 10:55 PM
6

Is it so hard to believe that both men and women have their own unique struggles?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 10:19 PM
2

The act of femicide (a woman being murdered) is far too common. First definition of femicide. That doesn't necessarily mean that every woman who is killed is a result of a femicide, but it does mean that if a person would have been alive had she been male instead IS a femicide. Second definition of femicide. Why are you using the same word to refer to two different things?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 07:53 AM
1

What about the possibilities that they didn't know to account for?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 07:42 AM
4

Contrary to your statement that Rowling isn't in the files. "JK Rowling isn't implicated in any of the currently released files." If you're going to lie do it about something that isn't just a few posts up. Nobody said she trafficked children, but she was definitely fine with helping Epstein after he was convicted. That "help" amounts to someone who isn't Rowling, arranging tickets from someone who also isn't Rowling, to a harry potter event and fucking up the number needed. Where exactly is Row…
/r/MensRights10/02/26 11:00 AM
2

Even then, if someone has suspicious ties to one of the most heinous sex traffickers of the modern era, I think they absolutely should be investigated. Regardless how big or small it seems. The files are the result of an investigation. The vast number of files is somewhat of an indication of how wide of a net was cast. The bill that forced their release has a clause that allows the feds to withhold documents if they would jeopardize an investigation. Most of the incriminating stuff is probably s…
/r/MensRights10/02/26 10:42 AM
2

Your evidence that Rowling is implicated is that a publicist was able to get tickets to one of her events? Siegal clearly had enough clout to get those tickets regardless of who she intended them for. That's kinda her job as a publicist. To make things worse for your case, he didn't even get the two tickets he wanted. The producer who promised the tickets was set a sternly worded email about the fuck up. Rowling herself was not involved in any of this. Just because I disagree with someones femin…
/r/MensRights10/02/26 09:30 AM
1

A witch hunt is not justice. The idea that the people in the files are abusers is just plain wrong. Some of them certainly are, but just because their name comes up doesn't mean they participated in the abuse. There are wikipedia and news articles in there. Even in the email chains you'll find rather mundane things like discussion of the presidential election. The context matters, but there are plenty of people willing to ignore that to smear their political opponents.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 08:04 AM
-1

JK Rowling isn't implicated in any of the currently released files. If you take the time to look at the 20ish entries her name appears in, you'd see that most of them are from one email chain where someone asked about meeting her. The rest are things like articles talking about her or a generic invitation to the opening to a harry potter musical. There's a lot of misinformation floating around about the epstein files. You should be careful about believing things without checking the source.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 07:48 AM
3

Shouldn't your example be something feminists did rather than what some feminist organization says?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 05:25 AM
4

It really depends on the context. This is in the files. Or you could look at this. Neither a wikipedia article nor an email chain discussing the election are red fags for everyone mentioned.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 05:17 AM
16

The Epstein files are online and searchable if you want to look for yourself. Casey Wasserman has 87 results, but keep in mind that what's been released is specifically not a part of ongoing investigations. If there's evidence of a crime it's probably still not public. A lot of what's going on is a big witch hunt. Also, there are altered documents being circulated. When presented with evidence it's best to verify it with the source.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 04:38 AM
7

You're telling me that the human brain, which is capable of seeing a human face in burnt cheese, will never be tricked by a robot designed to emulate human intimacy?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 03:26 AM
4

There absolutely were things hindering women from engaging in these things. Societal pressures and gender norms. This was (and definitely still is to an extent) a problem for men as well, of course. “Boys should do boy things and girls should do girl things.” The reason women have recently been able to break into these spaces is because that idea has started to be deconstructed by the new generations. This isn't an accurate assessment at all. What's happened is that feminists have gained power i…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:53 AM
3

Sure, that'd help too. As would measures to remove the grading discrimination the other guy mentioned. I don't think there's a silver bullet solution that'd fix everything on it's own.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 05:18 AM
60

I wonder if you could improve boys reading simply by changing their assignments to something they'd actually want to read.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 11:33 PM
1

The issue is they're including the welfare benefits in their measure of poverty, and declaring people who are bumped above the poverty line to no longer be impoverished. It's a lot like giving a man a fish everyday and claiming he's a fisherman. The problem isn't solved, just covered up.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 03:29 AM
1

The way to raise people out of poverty is free markets. Government welfare doesn't do that.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:52 PM
1

Clearly that's not what I'm talking about. Welfare affects incentives directly, it's not about assigning blame or shaming people. I do apologize for the misattribution though. I should have paid more attention to the usernames.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:09 AM
1

I don't know what dark crevice you pulled that from, but it has nothing to do with your idea of expanding welfare and incentivizing single motherhood.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 09:50 AM
28

South China News is a pretty suspicious source for stats on groping in Japan. Do you know where that stat actually comes from?
/r/MensRights28/01/26 08:42 AM
1

Sounds like we need to be fighting for better and cheaper childcare services, welfare systems for single parents, more affordable options in general on the resources needed to raise a child. But oddly I never see this argument being made on this sub. It always feels very 1-Dimensional. Only if you want to incentivize single motherhood and all the crap outcomes that produces.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 02:56 AM
2

I think a better approach would be to look up legislation and policies that help men and look at the people who enacted them. Looking up who worked to get the presumption of 50/50 custody passed in the states that have it would be a good place to start.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 01:57 AM
1

I'll leave the validity of the dismissed case to the lawyers. It's coming up in the new lawsuit anyway. My point is that it indicates that the released documents are not fabricated. The idea that the documents show treatments for disorders of sexual development is quite frankly stupid. The treatments are referred to as being for gender identity in plain english and some of the entries even have the diagnostic code for gender dysphoria on them. DSDs have their own separate diagnostic codes. For y…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:05 PM
17

That's what we get when people like Salley Miller Gearheart get to make the gender studies curriculum. If you want to see what other awful ideas she had read The future if there is one is female.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:20 AM
1

Id assume that welfare would be drowned out by alimony/CS from middle class and high-wage earners - don’t you think? It depends on the welfare policy. There might not be much of a middle class simply because the welfare discourages making the jump.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:55 AM
1

Most of the US for one.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:46 AM
8

Here is an article on women who ran banks, all of whom did so before 1974. Please do not use you victim narrative to erase people's accomplishments.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:35 AM
1

That said, it would be interesting to see how wages correlate to those three over time. In theory, as the wage gap declines, those three should also decline. Not necessarily. The wage gap is an average. If there are a lot oh high earners and low earners but few in the middle income bracket it can look the same as if there was a standard bell-curve distribution. The welfare system actually incentivizes the former distribution as it creates a section of income levels where gaining more income lowe…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:09 AM
3

What do you mean? Custody is automatically 50/50. That's only true in a few places. Also kinda irrelevant because those places still went through a phase with the tender years doctrine. That phase would still qualify as a cultural practice discriminating against men that resulted from feminism even if it was abolished.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:54 AM
3

Not what I said. Read it again and focus on what the words actually mean rather than what would be convenient for you.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:44 AM
9

The national review has a link to the lawsuit filing. You probably don't trust them either but with the case number an court (1-26-0018 and Rockwall county, Texas respectively) you can go to the county website and do a search through judicial case information to find that there is indeed a case by that name.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:34 AM
1

I'm not a fan of colonizing the savages to teach them how to be civilized. So yes, I do typically ignore the 3rd world social issues. Of course feminism is also most active in the west. Which makes me wonder what they're fighting for if there are no rights men have that women don't in the region.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:54 AM
3

Yes men have to fight their ex-wives to have some custody of their children. The fact that they win some most of the time just means their lawyers are good at picking their battles. The favored party is of course the mothers who get the children by default. A fact you decided to ignore.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:41 AM
4

None of it passes the smell test. Where is the child of 11 that was "gender changed" Could it be that the child in question had ambiguous intersex genitalia and that this is a corrective surgery after it could be that this gender confirming surgery was done for the benefit of a child that had that unfortunate condition? The fact that the guy was charged with HIPAA violations pretty much confirms that the data was genuine. The documents that were released do show treatment for gender identity iss…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:38 AM
26

As far as I can tell this guy was never charged with rape, only HIPAA violations. Given the subject matter politics were almost certainly a consideration in the charges. Transitioning minors is a very divisive topic and the hospital was lying about it. The daily mail article actually says how they found out it was Dr Rialon making the accusations. Apparently she told the FBI that she did it. Given that this investigation resulted in those HIPAA charges his defense lawyer would likely have access…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 01:33 AM
2

I think "controlling your emotions" is the wrong way to put it. Nobody can actually do that. What actually happens is people don't let their emotions control them.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 12:12 AM
5

Child custody favoring women.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:56 PM
9

Erin Pizzey's activism was centered around domestic violence. She was terrorized out of her country for noticing that many abused women were abusers themselves.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:55 PM
11

I absolutely agree that women are more oppressed than men and are treated as secondary citizens. What rights do men have that women don't?
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:51 PM
1

That's the purity spiral at work.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:42 PM
3

When women are approached with a sincere grievance I am sure we will respond in kind and men can finally have "men's rights". This hasn't happened historically. Legitimate issues like how rape, domestic abuse and child custody are handled are all largely ignored by women. Worse still they often get feminists coming out to oppose fixing the problems. The virtue you're assuming just isn't there.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 06:38 AM
1

Even then, there really wasn't a reason to trust them before they delivered.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 03:55 AM
1

Reminds me that planned parenthood was founded by a eugenicist that wanted to get rid of black people.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 03:07 AM
1

You're not taking the welfare system into consideration. At certain income levels it makes sense to not work for a raise as that would lower your standard of living. This also means that lowering your income can actually raise your standard of living.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:52 AM
13

Never trust a company when they say they're getting rid of woke politics. These people are deceitful and tend to just rebrand rather than change.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:25 PM
5

Calling yourself an anti-patriarchy feminist is redundant. Those feminists who think there aren't enough women CEOs and the like are also ant-patriarchy. Specifically they claim that patriarchy is to blame for women's poor representation in such jobs. This is the same argument that you put forth as to why OnlyFans is not a respectable job. Two aspects of society attributed to the same boogeyman. Both failing to look at causes of these aspects in favor of arguing that certain people just hate wom…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 09:04 AM
5

Capitalism manages resentment in the working class by improving their lives over time with abundant cheap goods and services. It doesn't need something stupid like DEI to hold things together. That's way too inefficient.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:47 AM
1

That's a very naive way to look at things. There's plenty of instances where that's just not true.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:21 AM
1

Think of it this way, the people who write the laws can survive riots and backlash much better than they can a conquering army.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:51 AM
3

I think what you quoted is incoherent ranting. On the other hand, I have heard of the idea that birth control pills change women's behavior. I just don't recall where exactly. Might have been from the Triggernometry guys or the Lotus Eaters podcast. Seems like something they would cover.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 03:58 AM
1

The US would have a hard time justifying invoking the draft given its larger professional military anyhow. The issue is that in the future, if they are in dire straits and a draft would get them out of it, there will be reason to quickly change the law. When the choice is to draft or be conquered nations will always choose the draft.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 03:41 AM
1

All well and good, but laws can be changed. What's preventing them from just changing the law when they need a draft?
/r/MensRights17/01/26 01:46 AM
0

I think the only workable solution to the selective service problem is to maintain an army of volunteers strong enough that you don't need to institute a draft. Laws against a draft would be quickly overturned if the need is dire enough, and women have a relatively easy out just by getting pregnant. That's not even getting into considerations of troop quality and morale. You can't hand-wave away practical considerations like these as traditional gender roles if you want a functioning policy.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 07:12 AM
2

The title should be more clear. The tweet presented shows evidence that it's women who were becoming more radical and not men.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:42 AM
1

When a woman noticed that a large portion of the women in domestic violence shelters were also violent to their husbands, the feminists expelled her from the shelter she founded and terrorized her out of the country. Modern studies have since vindicated that woman with finding that about half of domestic violence is reciprocal. Feminism isn't concerned with the truth what matters is their "truth".
/r/MensRights15/01/26 11:28 AM
1

What I question is why some here see feminist study as inherently detrimental to understanding history accurately. That's because the feminist lens is horribly biased. How do you expect them to see the truth when they start with the assumption that men are oppressors?
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:29 AM
5

Historically most people were subjugated is some fashion. Ignoring that men were just as pigeonholed as women is going to skew your understanding.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 01:36 AM
45

"Imagine being a woman and pandering to men who would rape you in about one second if they could" This bit is very telling as to what she thinks the nature of men is. Unfortunately she never stops to think about what would happen if this was true. 50% of the population is more than enough to terrorize the other half into accepting the "rape at will" terms. The fact that we don't see this is a strong indication that her views are false.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 06:10 AM
-1

I know, which makes missing the point all the more embarrassing.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 05:29 AM
-1

When you only read the first sentence, you often miss the point.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 03:16 AM
0

One of the big ways billionaires fuck over the middle class is by lobbying for regulations that stifle their competition. Calling this late stage capitalism only serves to shift the blame away from this collusion between government an industry and onto capitalist policy. That's not a good thing if you want capitalism to stick around.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 02:19 AM
2

This is nonsense. You only have a choice in how you act not in how others perceive those actions. You can't choose how others identify you.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 01:21 AM
1

Its core objective is the subordination of individuals and minorities to the nation, tradition, and state power, which aligns directly with the right-wing commitment to hierarchy over equality. The individual is the most basic unit of production. Collectivizing the means of production inevitably means subordinating the individual to the state. Communism really isn't that different from Fascism or Nazism. The latter two developed from lessons learned in the failures of the Soviet Union. All of th…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:44 AM
8

Prop 16). Thankfully it was defeated by the voters.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:36 AM
17

Newsom endorsed a bill that would repeal the state's anti-discrimination laws. He is absolutely a scumbag.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 11:25 PM
2

Gender as a concept will no longer exist, and concepts such as “masculinity” and “femininity” will no longer exist. Some people will be more or less of what used to be called “masculine” or “feminine”, but it wouldn’t be viewed in these terms. Only sex will exist: there will only be males, females, and intersex people. This is impossible. Masculinity and femininity are derived from the fact that men and women are different. You are asking people to pretend that parts of reality don't exist.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 01:20 AM
2

Right, so please explain how prior to the tender years doctrine, the father was granted sole custody of children in the event of a divorce.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 10:37 PM
3

The biggest red flag is the bit at the end where hey says that if a woman disagrees with his take it's because that woman doesn't trust you. More overall, there's nothing actually substantive in it to prove that what he says is true. No attempt at analyzing is made so that little speech has no way to evaluate how good a job men are doing at policing this type of behavior.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 10:30 PM
0

Your words misled the guy I replied to into thinking that no litigation had been filed. That they are factual is irrelevant to if they are misleading or not.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 10:12 PM
23

"hey guys, look at this propaganda video and be convinced"
/r/MensRights03/01/26 09:31 AM
14

She was first charged in November 2023 but let out on bail. Early April 2024 she was arrested again as more victims came forward. No bail this time, so she is waiting for her trial in prison. That trial is scheduled for May of this year (2026). She has been facing litigation for a couple of years at this point and most of that time has been spent behind bars. That's a far cry from "no litigation". Don't fall for OP's weasel words.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 07:02 AM
4

I wouldn't trust any predictions projecting that far out. A lot can happen in a millennia. For historical context that's 4 times as long as the US has existed. Massive social changes are possible in that time frame.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:29 AM
44

It's not just authoritarianism from the progressives though. Their "diversity is our strength" philosophy is inherently divisive. It places the focus on how we are different rather than how we are the same. If you want people to be accepting it's important to find common ground.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:13 AM
23

I like how the body size slice completely forgot that anorexia is a thing. Really shows where their priorities are.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:24 AM
4

Complete garbage. It's only purpose is to tell you how to accumulate victim points so you can claim that "your truth" is more important than others.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:19 AM
6

Of course you cant please them. They aren't trying to help people. The just want to feel good about themselves by being more righteous than you.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:10 AM
1

The tender years doctrine is the product of feminism. That's where custody defaulting to mothers comes from. Traditionally they went to the father as he was the head of the household.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:18 AM
1

I agree that we need to look to the past to see what works, but I also tend to agree with the OP / and you in the sense that, if we are recreating roles/ rigid ideals, we also can look to a “imagined” or different future. A lot of the time I don't think these roles are created. They're a product of what works in reality. This naturally changes as conditions change. The issue with imagining a different future is that societies are too complex the really model accurately like that. You can think "…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 10:09 AM
1

At it's core viability is about sustaining and perpetuating the people who make up society. The reality of it is no one actually decides what is viable and what isn't. That's determined by the conditions in which we live and our nature. If you want to know what is and isn't viable you have to look at what worked in the past and why. It's actually a really complicated question. Often we only know that something worked and not why. There's also the issue with changing conditions which sometimes ch…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 05:15 AM
2

Wikipedia thinks "trusted" secondary sources are better than primary ones. Whatever point you want to make, please don't use Wikipedia as a source.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 04:24 AM
3

Traditional masculinity elevates a specific model of manhood and implicitly devalues men who do not—or cannot—fit it. A big issue with this view is not all actions are equally viable. A society should promote what works and discourage what doesn't if it wants to survive. Second, it reinforces paternalism that ultimately makes men disposable. I don't think traditional society considered men disposable. They were supposed to be the head of the family. Leadership positions like that are not typical…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:55 AM
38

I guess the UN needs to lock me up for the crime of noticing their propaganda.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 09:25 AM
63

Ah yes, femicide, a word made up solely to make the murder of one sex sound worse.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 07:30 AM
6

I suspect that if you actually looked into the circumstances of women killed by their partners, most of them would be in mutually abusive relationships. That seems to be the pattern with domestic violence inflicted injuries.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 04:48 AM
8

They think this is the proper way to educate boys. That's the problem.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 01:17 AM
3

A few years ago the California Democrats tried to repeal the state's anti-discrimination law in the name of equity. Thankfully enough of the residents were sensible enough to prevent it.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:41 AM
7

Alot of American men also die and suffer because your Healthcare premiums are skyrocketing. Thanks Obama.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:37 AM
1

so eventually you have to close your doors, and after you do Walmart raises the price to 150% of what you were selling for, so $16.50 for that dozen cookies, because without other bakeries nearby, where are you going to buy your cookies from? What's stopping the Baker from reopening and charging $16 for a dozen cookies? They have already proven that they can stay afloat at the $11 price point.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 09:20 AM
0

The "sell at a loss" plan doesn't work in a free market. The mistake you're making is that new competitors can't start up during the exploitation phase. This isn't true in a free market. The reason you sometimes see this appear to work in the real world is due to government regulations. They place a greater burden on small businesses and stifle the growth of new competition, but that isn't a free market problem. I'm not sure if you got the correct link for evidence, it shows a post about bakers …
/r/MensRights17/12/25 08:40 AM
1

Businesses are in a good position to shift the burden of taxes onto someone else. A very simple example would be raising their prices to pass the additional cost onto the consumer. We saw this happen with tariffs recently. Ultimately it's the poor who take most of the tax burden, simply because they are the least able to shift it. In a free market, tax cuts benefit the poor because competition is very good at driving prices down and a company that faces less of a tax burden can go lower with the…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 07:44 AM
1

Claiming that it's a result of government imposed incentives isn't the win you think it is. The core of capitalism is the free market. That's specifically a lack of the government meddling in transactions like this. The policy you're blaming for the result, isn't particularly capitalist.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 07:09 AM
5

It's a non-profit, their investors aren't expecting a return and there's no profits to have margins on. Try actually reading the article before virtue signaling about how bad capitalism is.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:08 AM
0

One thing to consider is the effects that conscripting women has on the quality of the soldiers. The average man makes a better soldier than the average woman. Conscription is based on a lottery system rather than merit so the average is what you get. That's one of the reasons volunteers make better soldiers, they tend to self select based on their merit. Conscription is one of those areas where practical considerations push for a sexist outcome, just one of many reasons why fully volunteer arme…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 03:16 AM
12

Feminism is the biggest obstacle to equal rights in the west.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:55 AM
2

taking opportunities away from people based on their s*x is wrong. Yes I am aware, but you said that feminism isn't about taking things from others. Yet here we have affirmative action which does exactly that and there is no schism over it among the feminists. If this was a core part of feminism don't you think there'd be backlash to things that go against it?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:10 AM
6

How do you explain affirmative action? It was very popular among feminists and harms others by denying them opportunities they would have earned had things been determined by merit.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:14 AM
1

It's not hard to imagine. All you need to understand is that some people think the ends justify the means. That's why utopian thinking is so harmful. The end goal is so good it justifies any means to achieve it. Their intent is to make things better, but when someone starts to question how, the get painted as impeding progress and eliminated.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:03 AM
9

Either only the casually surface-level informed what feminism is based on what amounts to social hearsay (which also includes the quality of content within university textbooks), so they're still deluded that it's merely about "rights" and "opportunities" (which, btw, all women already had before the vote). These are the useful idiots. They aren't necessarily bad people. The just don't have either the capability or time to look into things on a deeper level. The other group is the true believers…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:44 AM
0

Not really, The point of little studies like this is to be a cheap probe into a topic. They're a good way to test a methodology and produce ideas for more rigorous research. They're fine as long as you keep their limitations in mind. The real problem, here is the journalist reporting it like any other study.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 01:09 AM
22

You could say much the same for any evil ideology. Hitler viewed the Jews much like feminists view men, as an oppressor who needed to be pushed aside (to put it mildly) so that history can advance to greater things. Evil people don't consider themselves as evil. Their truth conveniently justifies their evil actions.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:54 PM
3

No matter how poetically you try to put it, reparations for 200 year old crimes would victimize innocent people today. I'm surprised you're for them as a MRA. Reparations for historical victimization is one of the justifications feminism uses to discriminate against men today.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:33 AM
5

The victims of a crime done 200 years ago are long dead. The perpetrators of that crime are also long dead. Any reparations like that suffer from the problem of forcing people who didn't do the crime to pay people who have not been the victim of that crime. In what way is that just?
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:04 AM
6

I actually disagree with this article. I don't think the media that boys consume is a major teacher. If that was the case we'd see more left leaning boys and young men rather than less like the polls show. Instead I think the media people choose to consume is more reflective of what they value. You can see this in action with the comics industry. When the big American companies shifted to incorporating feminist morality into their stories readers simply left.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 03:55 AM
7

That's the useful idiot section of the movement. You'll find plenty of female feminists like this too. They're the people who take the propaganda at face value because they don't look into it beyond the surface level. There are people like this in pretty much any movement.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 05:55 AM
1

Many people think it's okay to kill them before they're born. What makes the much less harsh act of abandoning them so different?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 01:21 AM
2

What's the source on that? From what I understand adopted children are typically worse off than those with their actual parents.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 01:10 AM
14

The objectification and stuff is just definition creep to maintain the veneer of victim-hood. None of it is remotely similar to the hatred feminism pretends it is.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 01:02 AM
3

Hasty Generalization: A conclusion is drawn from a relatively small, unrepresentative, or anecdotal sample. (This is the fallacy that racism, sexism, and classism conduct.) No, this isn't the fallacy behind the 'isms. Most of these do have broad statistical data to support their claims. Let's use "black people are more violent" as an example. If you look at something like the FBI homicide statistics you'll find that black people are much more likely to be murderers than white people. This broad …
/r/MensRights08/12/25 04:08 AM
2

I wish Dr. Reeves didn't think boys are retarded.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 02:12 AM
1

I don't think that disaster was all that similar. The blizzard greatly complicated things. It's hard to carry out that duty to care when you can't see or navigate.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 12:06 AM
1

As far as I know we only have the prosecution's side of the story right now. Their claims are obviously going to be biased in favor of the guy being responsible. That doesn't necessarily mean that they will hold up in court.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 11:17 PM
3

Oh, my mistake. I assumed you cared about the truth.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:19 AM
3

If the stats are mostly based on dead dogs there is almost certainly some bias in the results. Men are stronger than women and thus more likely to accidentally kill the poor dog than an abusive woman is. You can see the same pattern in domestic violence where female victims are more likely to be injured but the rates of abuse are similar between the sexes.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:19 AM
90

There really isn't enough information provided in the article to evaluate this. It's possible that the man was criminally negligent is some way just like it's possible the woman did something stupid and got herself killed. Without knowing the specifics it's impossible to know either way.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 06:40 AM
5

Reminder that the California democratic party tried to repeal the anti-discrimination law so they could discriminate against men. It only failed because the voters weren't that dumb. To say that their policy isn't bad for men is factually incorrect. Some of their policies are bad for men.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 09:01 AM
3

This isn't the study I was thinking of, but it does cover the effects on the falsely accused. It's not very long, with a good chunk of it being a table and citations. Your thoughts on the matter seem to follow with what was found. Keep in mind that as this paper is looking at living people there's a survivorship bias involved.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 04:58 AM
12

Men’s worst fear is that women will laugh at them. I don’t think this is accurate. I think it’s more accurate to say a lot of men are afraid of social consequences from false accusations. I once read a scientific paper that looked at the effects of false accusations. One of the things the found was an alarmingly high rate of suicide.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 09:34 PM
1

The latter two of those recommended causes are directly in opposition to feminism. It's their propaganda that paints men as abusers even though the data doesn't back that up. It's feminists who cry about male only social institutions being sexist hotbeds for the patriarchy. Working on those issues makes you anti-feminist by necessity.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 10:38 PM
1

Why would I hate myself just because you presented shitty data?
/r/MensRights02/12/25 10:24 PM
13

All these feminist subreddits have examples on how Feminism has helped them, especially those men: Some men who subscribe to this movement say that "They started to see women as people", "And how much respect and recognition women should be given" which is hilarious because does it mean that if it wasn't for feminism this percentile of men viewed women to be inferior? Make it make sense. As hypocritical that question sounds, ask that question and your ass is banned. The sad part is that the most…
/r/MensRights02/12/25 07:14 AM
34

No, she's a propagandist not a journalist. Actual journalists are rare these days. The veneer of journalism is just there to lend credibility to the propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 07:02 AM
9

That link isn't about equal pay for equal work. It's a propaganda piece that lumps a variety of differences between men and women into a number to complain about.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 04:11 AM
9

Why wouldn't it be different in different cultures? Does every culture have the same priorities?
/r/MensRights02/12/25 02:49 AM
16

Equal pay for equal work is already law. That fight has been won. If you're thinking of the wage gap that's down to the choices men and women tend to make.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 02:34 AM
2

Liberal feminism isn't liberal. Like all forms of feminism it focuses on women as a group whereas liberalism is about the individual. Liberalism doesn't even need anything tacked on to it to secure women's rights. It did just fine on it's own when the US republicans were working to abolish slavery. The only reason to pair the two is to make feminism seem more palatable.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 12:04 AM
10

Simple solution: Non-variable sentencing. Works for race as well.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:54 PM
3

Actually I got that definition from Sally Miller Gearheart, a feminist academic that helped to develop women's studies in collages.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 02:50 PM
12

Does due process not apply just because a crime is deemed too minor?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 02:40 PM
0

The patriarchy is the social bonds between men. How do you propose we fight that without oppressing men?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 02:30 PM
2

Honestly, that paper doesn't prove shit. They interviewed 40 police officers and complained about the responses. No attempt was made to validate any of the claims made by the officers. It was a waste of everyone's time and nothing resembling science was accomplished.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 08:24 AM
0

Most forms of feminism are capitalist. I don't think any form of feminism is capitalist. All that I know of treat women as a class whereas capitalism is all about the individual. Intersectional feminism comes the closest, but they never take it all the way to the individual, just glue a bunch of classes together in an arbitrary amalgamation. It's all very socialist.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:43 AM
6

Boys are more visually oriented in the media they consume. For the stuff aimed at girls you'll want to look into romance novels.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:24 AM
17

I wouldn't say that this is the case. As mentioned in the article, the finance and construction industries have more opportunity for overtime and they're mostly done by men. Again women choose how much to work. Too much overtime is one of the reasons people choose a different industry. Given that women prefer more of the life side of work life balance it makes sense that you'd find fewer of them in careers that have more overtime. A big mistake you're making here is the assumption that because w…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:09 AM
19

Overtime is simply paying men more for the same functional output. It's not. Women have access to the same extra hours that men do. Working more overtime is just a good representation of men being willing to work longer hours than women. There are only two solutions to this part of the earnings gap, force people to pay women more for less work or force women to work more hours. Both of these are much worse than accepting that there will be an earnings gap. It's the result of individual's own cho…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:57 AM
50

It's kinda funny that she misses the fact that young girls and women did in fact have mentors and role models for the centuries she's complaining about. It's just that they were their mothers, and respected ladies in their communities. The similar to the men and young boys with their fathers and other men in the community. Her belief in patriarchy theory has erased the women her ancestors looked up to.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 07:57 AM
4

Its like they live in a fantasy realm where all the need for something to be true is for them to say it exists... Yes, modern feminism is a postmodernist movement.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:45 AM
28

These welfare traps are intentional. They create a base of voters dependent on the government remaining in power. Women are the ideal target for this grift because it's easier to pass legislation under the banner of helping the poor starving women.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 01:33 AM
30

You must have a pretty low opinion of women if you think being loyal is too high a bar for them.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 01:15 AM
3

"Who set the system up?" presumes that it was set up by people, but there are plenty of systems where that isn't the case. Weather systems or ecosystems are great examples. It should be abundantly clear that societies are influenced by their environment so it seems a bit premature to limit things to only human actions.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 01:12 AM
5

Add her TED talk to the list as well.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 03:09 AM
2

I will continue supporting feminism, as in promoting equality and trying to end the patriarchy, The patriarchy exists in the bonds between men. How do you propose to smash it without socially isolating men? And if you socially isolate men in what way is that promoting equality?
/r/MensRights23/11/25 01:55 AM
6

It's not that hard to blame women for their own actions. They are autonomous human beings after all. Who else would you blame for their choice in music?
/r/MensRights22/11/25 08:28 AM
2

That IS the case. We aren’t independent from the things we say. The art cannot be separated from the artist because they are the same thing. “Character assassination” is the only way. I sure hope you hate the volkswagon then.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 03:55 AM
151

CDC says 49,000 suicides in 2023 and 22,830 homicides in the same year. Males make up almost 80% of those suicides resulting in 39,200 victims.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 07:09 AM
6

People say social media shouldn't be taken seriously, but these are real people with these ideas that are confident enough to say on a public platform with their names and pictures up. It's not just social media though. Sally Miller Gearheart expressed much the same opinion in her essay "The future if there is one is female". There was also the grievance studies affair where a feminist rewrite of mein kampf made it through peer review.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 01:38 AM
1

That's the boundary set by those places. By your argument, if you grew up in such a society it wouldn't be a problem for you to be attracted to a 17 year old.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 09:27 AM
5

The bill is available online to form your own opinion, but it's over 400 pages long. The section on custody arrangements seems to start on page 160. Edit: this bill is a mess but it does say "The court shall not give preference to a parent or legal custodian because of that parent's or legal custodian's financial status or gender." on page 134. "Best interest of the child" does seem to be the weasel word of the day though.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 07:45 AM
0

What about places where the age of consent is 16?
/r/MensRights18/11/25 07:07 AM
3

It's kinda hard to argue against all feminist points at once. To properly go through it would essentially require writing an encyclopedia. It always takes more effort to debunk bullshit than it does to spout it. You'd be better off picking out some of the major points to look at more closely.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 02:42 AM
8

This methodology is terrible. First of all forcible rape is not the same as rapes, sexual assaults, and child sex abuse. The two numbers measure different things and aren't comparable. Second your math just provides the number of allegations that did not meet the beyond a reasonable doubt bar. There's two possible outcomes here. Either the allegations were false or the evidence wasn't sufficient for proof. Without knowing that ratio the number is pretty useless.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 01:52 AM
1

Typically with this kind of thing the countries will negotiate rather than use force. Signing the convention will be paired with a trade deal or support for some endeavor the non-signatory wants to accomplish.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 05:02 AM
1

Sexual selection is always going to be sexist so that's not really a problem. As for your age objection it's not really an issue. Women just look for predictors of success rather than jump strait to the goal. At least when they have to. These older successful men don't typically have trouble finding willing women when they happen to be single. Also keep in mind that marriage has to be maintained. If a previously driven man slacks off after marriage he's in for a miserable time.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:45 AM
4

Postmodernism is a philosophical view about the nature of reality. It doesn't really work towards a goal. It supposedly tells you how reality works. But given that it rejects the notion of objective reality your nonsense on top of nonsense view is largely correct. Feminists like it because it lets them ignore facts that contradict their world view.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:39 AM
1

If it was based on merit, you'd have an equal split between men and women in high level positions. This isn't true. Men have more of an incentive to compete for those high level positions because such jobs are a significant factor for women when choosing husbands, whereas men don't care anywhere near as much when choosing wives. Men will work harder for the jobs than the women will.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:54 AM
15

Welcome to postmodernism. Where the facts don't matter and questioning the narrative makes you a misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:47 AM
1

It's kinda odd for someone who is concerned about the discussion being too narrow to then insist that we engage in a holier-than-thou dick waving contest. That's a way more narrow subject. Seems like you're quite desperate to move away from the misdeeds of the California democrats. As for the accusation of concern trolling, that seems like projection to men. You are encouraging people to trust the slime-balls who tried to make discrimination legal after all. It's kinda like asking people to supp…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:40 AM
1

It's not an accurate reflection of why people think this will be bad though. You're just looking at the reaction and ignoring how people come to that conclusion.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:47 AM
1

That's not a thought process it's just a straw-man you made to complain about. A thought process would be something like "we used the historical actions of the people involved to determine if they were a good fit for a position". Your straw-man is conflating the results for the analysis.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 12:54 AM
6

So even though we have examples of California ruling in favor of men who were discriminated against on the basis of gender, and Gov. Newsom has publicly spoken up for men repeatedly, you automatically assume this council is going to be bad? It's a reasonable assumption given that the people in charge tried to repeal the law that makes sex discrimination illegal in the name of equality. Especially since this council is being formed in response to a lawsuit that they were going to lose due to thos…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 06:44 AM
2

The issue is that equality is fundamentally impossible. It's a measurement of value which is entirely subjective. When someone fights for equality they're often just fighting to impose their values on others. It's very different from recognizing that people have the same inherent rights due to their nature.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 05:57 AM
5

Intersectional feminism is just a scam to get a variety of socialists under the same banner. If they actually followed their rhetoric to it's logical conclusion they'd arrive at classical liberalism. The individual is the smallest minority after all. Unfortunately that'd kill the justification for their protected classes.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:24 AM
21

Feminists literally terrorized a woman out of her country for daring to notice that women were often abusers too.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 02:16 AM
4

Patriarchy is basically "men are superior to women", which causes problems for men and some "perks" to women. Of course this patriarchy has thousands of years of continued civilization tipping the scales in favor of it's view being closer to reality that the feminist one. But you probably didn't think about the horrible implications of patriarchy theory when you typed that. This theory fundamentally requires women to be inferior to men for history to have played out like it did. Probably why fem…
/r/MensRights02/11/25 04:56 AM
1

Not helped or shielded from the social problems caused by their autism.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 12:45 AM
19

it plays into the traditional roles of Female=submissive and caregiver Male=Aggressive and protector. Which is an effect of misogyny. This type of viewpoint is a big reason why you have such a blind spot for the suffering of men. Traditional roles have nothing to do with the hatred of women. It's more about the conditions of the time and the necessity of successfully raising children. They were so rigid because to do otherwise would mean the end of that society. That rigidity cuts both ways. It'…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:07 AM
2

Not that I know of
/r/MensRights29/10/25 03:33 AM
9

His view on the education disparity is basically that the boys are retarded and need to start later so they're mature enough to compete with the girls. He calls it redshirting.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 01:16 AM
3

I don't know how you expect a neutral point of view from a site so backwards that they put secondary sources above primary ones.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 12:59 AM
2

That Republican's proposal is feasible in the sense that it's just a form of amnesty for illegal immigrant women, but I doubt it'd do much for the incels. I suspect most of them have problems other than a shitty dating scene to contend with. Government issued girlfriends is either marxist nonsense applied to dating or some porn plot that made it somewhere it doesn't belong. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that this is the result of some type of troll operation.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 08:40 AM
23

im a woman for reference, i cant be an incel. also sorry if im not supposed to be here as a woman Technically you could be an incel as the term was coined by a woman to describe herself. But people will call an openly married man an incel too, so don't expect actual logic from people using it as an insult. Also rights are universal. You don't need any particular traits to advocate for them.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 12:31 AM
4

It's not particularly charitable to ignore the victims of a problem you are trying to fix just because they aren't a part of the preferred group. Feminism has done that and worse.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:17 AM
6

it's because feminists are focusing on the ways women have worse outcomes. It's just the scope of the project. And that's just a way to say that feminism doesn't care about equal rights. You'll never achieve equality if you can't see half the equation.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 01:33 AM
7

If you're equal to your spouse there's no change in value from being married or not. That would lead to higher divorce rates compared to situations where you value your spouse more than yourself. The disparity in divorce rates suggests that husbands generally value their wives higher than wives value their husbands.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 05:59 AM
10

This is why the left is losing people. Rather than look for common ground, you latch on to anything to push the right away. Even to the point of making shit up.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 02:05 AM
1

Until the men's rights movement MOVES toward all men and away from strictly straight white conservative male narratives, How exactly is the men's rights movement strictly about strait white conservative male narratives?
/r/MensRights10/10/25 09:00 AM
9

So your evidence is two removed posts, and part of the second most upvoted comment of one of them, with the omitted portion saying men and women are largely similar. Notably the top comment you skipped over is a refutation of the idea that women are incapable. Seems like pretty weak evidence to me.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 04:46 AM
14

Patriarchy exists in the bonds between men. Removing anything men can use to bond with other men is smashing the patriarchy. That's why feminists work to subvert media aimed at men.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 02:35 AM
20

A complex system of factors leading to the average pay of women is being ignored. That because most people believe that women have free will and are responsible for their own actions. Seriously, stop treating them like some object blown around by the whims of society. Women are full fledged human beings. They can make decisions for themselves and don't need people like you telling them that they're oppressed because you don't like their choices.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:26 AM
1

It's a reasonable assumption when they adhere to an ideology that puts dogma above reality.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:41 AM
9

Have you considered that maybe feminists are just terrible at science?
/r/MensRights21/09/25 12:25 AM
1

So the paycheck men receive for building things means nothing? Quite the odd definition of slavery you got there,
/r/MensRights20/09/25 12:33 AM
3

Why are you assuming that building things makes them slaves?
/r/MensRights18/09/25 11:59 PM
1

For example, it is an objective reality that I have brown hair, it is a measurable trait that can be physically witnessed. The funny part is that brown does not actually exist. The light that makes it up is actually orange. We just call it brown in certain contexts.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 08:16 AM
9

One of the tricks they do to hide the rape of males is to call it something else, like "made to penetrate". Look at the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey for example.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 04:07 AM
14

The most common example is razors and other things similar to this, where it's the exact same product except one is marketed towards women, and the one marketed towards women costs more. Often when they claim that it's the exact same product, it's simply a lie. Like comparing two sticks of deodorant with different ingredients. Women do like their fancy scents more than men.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 05:17 AM
1

Personally, I think it's more that the realities of pregnancy are less compatible with working rather than women being better. Handling children is an acquired skill. A man could be just as good at it as a woman.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:04 AM
0

No. This is still slavery organized in an illusion of freedom of choice, but to partake in the system is mandatory. The other option is to starve, be humiliated and looked down upon socially. Selling your labor isn't mandatory. You can always produce goods or provide services and sell those directly, there's also the housewife/househusband option. There are more options than you think.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 05:57 AM
9

Don't forget to watch her Ted talk too. It's about her changing mindset. Quite worth a watch.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 02:18 AM
1

They periodically have to switch language to avoid people noticing the stupidity of fighting discrimination with more discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 08:35 AM
0

Gay and trans people get hate because their activists insist on rubbing their sexuality in everyone's faces.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 02:13 AM
2

How do you deal with the fact that strong legislative market control is at odds with the people's economic agency?
/r/MensRights27/08/25 02:05 AM
2

A few years ago I forced myself into conservative spaces (I am progressive). It was really eye opening to get to know conservative thought as more than just the meme that leftist gotchya media shows. I suspect a conservative entering progressive spaces would experience something similar. I think someone on the right is much less likely to share your experience than someone on the left. The right is much more open to discussing a broad range of ideas than the left is. Those purity tests really st…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 07:28 AM
8

i would imagine we have a whole generation of younger men who never watch these films because they're not interested in watching the strong female lead role movies. The sad part is it doesn't have to be this way. Men will happily watch something like the aliens movie. It's just that modern Hollywood is so bad at writing female characters for men it creates a noticeable pattern which men use to inform their purchasing decisions.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:04 AM
6

Not women, feminists in the relevant industries. It's due to their shared ideology rather than some conspiracy.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:23 AM
16

The issue is they don't want men and boys to enjoy Bond. Or any other character for that matter. This isn't the first time they've done this.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:58 AM
7

he “77 cents on the dollar” figure is a broad average, not meant to imply men and women are paid differently for the exact same job. I see this was a lie. The facts of the matter is none of these wage gap measures actually find that systemic sexism or discrimination. It's based on the idea that if we don't know the cause we must assume that it's due to sexism. That isn't how things work though. We've seen the controlled pay gap shrink smaller and smaller over the years. Leaving less and less roo…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:42 AM
1

All for accountability on both sides but immediately jump to criticizing the GOP when confronted with the Dems sitting on their hands on the issue. Somehow I'm not convinced.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 02:12 AM
6

Feminism causes a lot of problems. Best example is probably the disparity in how domestic violence is treated. The male perpetrator, female victim assumption is 100% caused by feminists. Just look at what they did to Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 01:56 AM
3

Capitalism is an economic system based on the voluntary exchange of goods and services. It doesn't have much to say about how society should be structured. That would be the job of liberalism.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 01:45 AM
5

In other words the pay gap is an issue where feminists think women make the wrong choices in life and it shrinks smaller and smaller as you account for more things. Why is this a problem again?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 01:41 AM
2

I don't know why you are giving the Dems a free pass on the Epstein thing. They had ample time to do something about it when Biden was in office but decided to sweep it under the rug.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 01:13 AM
9

It's about recognizing a structural pattern where corrective policies can overshoot and become discriminatory in the opposite direction. Corrective policies don't overshoot and become discriminatory. They start out that way in an effort to combat discrimination with more discrimination. Predictably, this never actually works. The way to avoid this is to simply reject discriminatory policies in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 12:39 AM
6

The two results are not mutually exclusive, even in the same sample. The survey asked if they pretended to be more extreme than they actually are along with some specific opinions on progressive ideology. More moderate liberals can easily produce both sets of results.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 11:48 PM
1

Why are you calling the bourgeois the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights15/08/25 07:57 AM
2

Different wording, same concept. Men set up the system so it's workings are their fault. If that wording upsets you, it's probably a good idea to reevaluate your stance.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 10:49 AM
6

Only if that matters to the solution in the first place. You box yourself in when you assume it's men's fault.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:10 AM
9

Well if the assumption that it was men who primarily set up the system is wrong, your solution is very likely to crash and burn.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 05:40 AM
27

Really it's just an example of the absurdity of treating all men who have ever existed as the same. The men who were tyrants are not the same men who fought for liberty.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 05:26 AM
2

This is natural selection, women are no longer forced to marry undesirable men (you). Your bloodline will die despite the attempt forced birth on woman. Kinda funny that you use this insult then turn around and brag about your lesbian relationship. You are aware that it takes a man and a woman to reproduce, right?
/r/MensRights07/08/25 06:47 AM
1

I wonder what percent of health conditions are female specific. There's a lot of overlap between the things males and females can suffer from.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 04:05 AM
1

You seem to have glossed over all of that as if I didn’t say it. I asked a question about how something you said relates to another thing you said. Rather than answering you decided to complain. Really don’t know why you even brought it up other than just projecting I guess. Here I was attempting to help your struggle to understand something. Given how this exchange has gone, that seems like a futile effort now.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 03:17 AM
1

So not sure where you got that. I quote "it merely asks that we treat all people as being inherently equal, and from that starting point of inherent equality,". Did you not read the paragraph I quoted? I didn't ask to form a classless society. No you didn't, but it's similar utopian equality pipe dream. One that actually went somewhere. Unfortunately the road to hell is paved in good intentions. That's reason enough to dislike ideology that want's the impossible.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 02:35 AM
1

Egality has no problem with the reality that people are not equal, it merely asks that we treat all people as being inherently equal, and from that starting point of inherent equality, how they are and what they do with their lives defines them from there. Egalitarianism demands that nobody be deemed inherently inferior or superior, due to their gender or race or caste or religion etc. And, to the greatest degree reasonably possible, society ought not impose inequity through social constructs. H…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:02 AM
1

The issue is that equality is fundamentally impossible. Humans are different from one another so they value things differently. If you give people the liberty of acting on their values you'll see different results. Those results are often taken as a measure of equality and used to justify attempts to force the "equal" outcome. But if some people have the ability to force society to conform to their vision, they aren't equal to those that can't. It just doesn't work.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 12:55 AM
3

It's partisan fearmongering about this executive order. Read that and you'll be better informed than the OP on the issue.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 06:25 AM
5

Dude, just use spoiler tags, that's what they're there for.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:12 AM
11

I don't think "mature" is the proper descriptor.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:01 AM
3

Collective shout is just the scapegoat for what the payment processors already want to do. There's a lot of power in choosing what people can spend their money on.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 10:45 AM
8

Any study that uses hours worked in a household as a measure is dishonest. They make the false assumption that the value of that work is equal. It is not, value is subjective. The wife and husband are going to have different ideas on which chores are the worst and which are the best. This easily creates situations where a longer duration chore is more tolerable than a shorter one. You can't measure this with time use studies.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:31 AM
5

It depends on the reasons they give for why marriage isn't good. This along with the divorce rates supports the idea that dating and marriage isn't worth it because of the risk. On the other hand it contradicts the idea that men's provider role is bad for them.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 04:59 AM
12

Too bad, we only offer justice not revenge.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 09:30 AM
8

You realize that you are using the same "patriarchal gendered norms" to justify opposite policies right? You could even combine the two arguments and support a compromise position of shared custody. So how exactly do these stereotypes determine which policy is implemented? Also, everyone's social status was inherently tied to their family. To limit that to just the husband and wife is just more feminist misdirection.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 12:35 AM
5

I do agree that women are favoured in courts when it comes to the rights of children, this is beginning to change but it is still an issue, 100%. I would argue though that this relates to patriarchal gendered norms i.e. the woman is main caregiver of a child. Wouldn't dismantling this stereotype benefit men in court? The problem with this view is prior to the tender years doctrine, in the event of a divorce, custody of children went to the father. It was feminists that had the law changed so tha…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:22 PM
15

Why do men and boys have to fit in an old, moldy box? Just leave them alone, let them live how they want to live. If you leave them alone most of them will be masculine. That's how masculinity works. It's not a box that contains men, it's a description of how men are.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 10:59 PM
4

Isn't this just a clever way to protect itself from valid criticism, while looking progressive on the surface. I think it's very much in line with progressive thought. Those types of mental gymnastics are necessary when whatever utopia they are trying to progress towards is incompatible with reality. It's less to protect from outside criticism and more to protect their beliefs from themselves.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 08:04 AM
-7

In this context is the snake oil that's being sold the age of consent laws?
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:39 AM
-21

I don't think there's anything particularly odd about having age of consent laws. They let us punish people for abusing children. Many even make allowances for this both are underage problem. You can disagree with the particulars but society has to have some standard to separate children from adults.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 01:57 AM
2

Any society that wants to continue existing requires self sacrifice. Particularly in the form of raising children. It becomes an issue when either the sacrifice is all consuming or when some are told that they don't have to sacrifice anything. The key is to maintain a balance. Some of your effort must be reserved for your own goals to avoid misery and maintain your ability to support others.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 03:56 AM
3

If you are a liberal, you should be invested in capitalism too. Capitalism is the economic implementation of liberalism.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 12:43 AM
3

I don't think that properly explains the gap. It's just a correlation. I'd expect some of the same causes to produce both poverty and poor health.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:40 AM
1

And you are going to convince precisely zero people with that argument, because the anti-abortion guys don't share your view the the fetus isn't a life, and the number of abortions dwarf all other forms of homicide combined. Under the anti-abortion view that math is firmly in their favor. If you actually want to convince someone, you need to address the core of the disagreement, which is when a human counts as a person. Any argument that doesn't touch that subject is just pointless virtue signal…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 05:09 AM
1

Most people sadly either lack the required pattern recognition and/or critical thinking skills to see reality for what it actually is instead of what people tell you it is, or they just don't care. My theory is that autistic behavior pushes someone toward the uncanny valley. It's largely a failure to overcome that creeped out feeling rather than any moral or intellectual failing. The difference in treatment by sex could be explained by men's higher tolerance for risk and women's bias in favor of…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:45 AM
1

I'm pretty sure there's a sizable group that would rather resolve the disparity by banning abortion. One of the results of men's rights being politically homeless is you get all sorts of political affiliations hanging around.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:05 AM
1

The system gives you privileges. Those privileges can and are taken away from you if you do bad things (in the UK, your "right" to vote is taken away once you are incarcerated for a crime - i.e. it's not a right, it's a privilege that can be revoked). The logical conclusion of this is that rights don't exist. Even your examples of actual rights can be taken away by society simply by killing the individual.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:00 AM
1

Such laws make sense when measuring equality via outcomes. If the under represented are given preferential treatment in an area it will push their numbers up and equalizing the numbers. It's the rationalization for various affirmative action policies.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:28 AM
1

My point is that people disagree on what is equal. It's not surprising that you see things that way.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:15 AM
1

I'm not that guy, but the fundamental problem with equality in regards to people is that its a subjective value judgment. That's how you get things like feminists using the demographics of a job as a measure of equality while other people will look at how laws discriminate for their measure. Both are fighting for equality but their solutions will often be at odds with each other simply because they are focusing on different ways of measuring equality.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 12:46 AM
10

I'm Anti-Feminist against modern feminism. Long before Andrea Dworkin, feminism used to actually be tolerable, civil, and about equality. Are you thinking of before or after the feminist bombing campaign in support of the right to vote?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:05 AM
3

That's the standard quality of news these days. Left or right doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 07:29 AM
1

Did you really just compare women doing laundry by a river to men colonizing entire legal, political, and economic systems? No that's all in your head. The appropriate comparison would be the men doing farm labor. Congregating for survival labor isn’t the same as holding institutional power. It certainly counts when the goal is "every public, private, and professional space" Strict sex roles didn’t cut both ways. They cut women out of opportunity. You’re not defending women’s contributions. You’…
/r/MensRights19/06/25 07:03 AM
5

Men colonized every public, private, and professional space for centuries You say that like women never congregated around a water source to do laundry or a fire to cook without men hovering over them. Newsflash, strict sex roles cut both ways. You won't find men in feminine roles just like you wont find women in the masculine ones. The only way to reach your conclusion is to ignore the contributions of women in society.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:29 AM
5

Utopian thinking is dangerous. When the end goal is a utopia, you can justify any means to get there. This has led to murder and death in the past.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:00 AM
5

Have you watched "The Red Pill"? Cassie Jaye also has a TED talk about making that documentary that's worth watching. Although that talk isn't really about men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:10 AM
1

Masculinity is simply the things we associate with men. It includes both the physical and behavioral. It's the inevitable result of our ability to recognize patterns. Its really not a problem unless you forget that outliers and exceptions exist or want everyone to conform to your idea of it.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:05 AM
2

Of course women had a say in how society was run, they're people not objects.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 12:42 AM
4

The Parental Rights and Custody laws A feminist used a tragedy to flip custody from fathers to mothers. False Allegations Its feminists who are pushing for things like "believe women" and the erosion of due process in places like collage campuses. Education Bias against boys Feminists saw "unequal" educational outcomes for women and pushed for changes to "correct" things. Workplace deaths Rather than an issue this is a counterpoint to feminist claims. It runs into the same issues as the wage gap…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:45 AM
1

It means a bad way to view something.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 09:47 AM
3

Aren't the people she's ordering to target men the ones who drove them out in the first place? Ideologically speaking at least.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 09:45 AM
1

Well that explains what you think makes a system oppressive. Although I do think "a system must discriminate on the basis of immutable characteristics to avoid oppression" is a shit take.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 05:54 AM
1

No, I still stand by my words.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 01:54 AM
1

I'm asking how you know it's due to systems. Right now it seems like you're just making the assumption.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 07:42 PM
1

How did you get that out of "women did have a say in both politics and how society was structured even without voting rights"?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 07:30 PM
6

How do you know that difference is due to a system and not individual choice?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:09 AM
1

Well if that's what you believe now, have at it I guess. Not sure how you got there from my comment though. Did someone else have a very convincing point and you replied here by accident?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:02 AM
5

There was a recent study in incels which found that 30% qualified for a referral for autism treatment. That kinda suggests the autistic men are just left to rot rather than being coddled like a child.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 06:28 AM
1

Just looking at voting rights is a very shallow way of looking at things. It ignores things like women's involvement in getting the prohibition amendment passed or the British draft in WWI. Both of which happened without voting rights. Women did have a say in both politics and how society was structured even without voting rights.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 06:22 AM
2

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03161-y
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:37 PM
2

Tinmen posts are usually better than this, seems to be missing most of the slides. The paper this is from is open access and available here.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:21 PM
4

There's only so many sea monkey marriage ceremonies an academic institution can call science before people start questioning their credibility.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 06:27 AM
2

I'm not sure that a duty to suffer has anything to do with it. That was certainly the mindset in WW1 but it earned men voting rights and things like shell shock were recognized.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:51 PM
10

Words are cheap, and the dems aren't trustworthy. If they want to change minds, it's actions that matter.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:52 AM
1

If feminists fought for equal rights they would have been drafted to fight the Nazis and circumcision would be illegal. There's nothing wrong with fighting for equal rights, but that's not what has happened. Then there's the problem where feminism assumes any disparity in outcome is due to discrimination rather than the factos they failed to account for. Their solution for this is typically corrective discrimination to even up the numbers.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:56 PM
2

What happens when you try this is you destroy the industries you forced to implement it. The vast majority of consumers don't want to pay for niche interests like this.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:07 PM
4

If an ideology needs to use women as a shield from criticism, it's probability not a good one. There is no reason to equate feminism with women when there are both anti-feminist women and feminist men. It's just a movement that does shitty things like this.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:57 AM
4

There isn't anything particularly wrong with using research from 1992. It's probably more reliable than the current stuff given the degradation of academia. Not being up to date is certainly a limitation, but that's better than feminist lysenkoism.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:11 AM
20

Have you ever actually looked into how those stats are generated?
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:42 AM
8

That's not necessarily true. There was an Australian report that conclude something along the lines of "suicide is a logical solution to men's problems. More social support may be needed to bring the numbers down." In a case like that forming a plan for improvement and keeping them working on it would be better than talking about feelings.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 12:03 AM
6

I don't think that's limited to men. We didn't evolve to handle social interactions with thousands of semi-anonymous people.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 11:56 PM
2

IIRC this guy uses co-pilot to put these together. Hes got a mental issue which causes him to write big blocks of text with no paragraphs or punctuation. I kinda feel bad for him. That's not a state where one can afford to worry about others.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 11:46 PM
23

Oh yeah, white males the Jews totally have it so hard, they are the most privileged class of people, who literally stole basically every native person's lands German's money and spread themselves across the planet. Different ideology, same "logic".
/r/MensRights28/05/25 07:08 AM
10

You might want to look up what liberty means. That should make it apparent how advocating for it in general would cover the Afghan s you mention. The issue those rape proportions is in most places the rape of men isn't even considered as such. They also face the prospect of being congratulated for their victimization. It's really not a good place to be. I'm not familiar with the Georgia thing so will refrain from commenting on it.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:04 PM
3

How many isn't really a useful way to look at a movement. Most of the people who make up the group are going to be useful idiots anyway. Rather the movement should be judged by what it accomplishes or in cases where it fails what those with power within the movement think. You're not going to get a very clear picture of their goals by talking to the randos who barely know what they're fighting for.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:48 PM
15

Feminism supports rapists going free as long as they are women. In most states men don't actually have any reproductive rights. If those issues are your goal feminism is a very poor answer. Afghanistan would be better served with an advocacy for liberty rather than authoritarianism. Their issues aren't limited to women.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:33 PM
9

The men who gained the right to vote around the same time period did not have to firebomb their government for it. That violence really wasn't necessary. In fact it stopped before they got the rights they were fighting for. The reason? Those men that couldn't vote were being sent off to fight one of the worst wars in human history and the suffragettes wanted to support that effort. As to your question, modern feminists don't typically omb government buildings because they are in them. There's no…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:25 PM
1

ontological generosity is not the denial of anyone’s right to speak, it is the invitation for people to be more fully themselves. No one’s tongue is being tied here. But if a man expresses tenderness and is mocked as “less of a man,” then we are not in a realm of free speech, we are in a realm of social punishment masquerading as tradition. Yea, as I said self contradictory garbage. You say derision and devaluation are part of the human experience. Of course they are. But to institutionalize the…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 10:36 AM
1

What I propose is not ideological coercion but ontological generosity to allow men the full spectrum of being without fear of derision or devaluation. Right, so you propose to deny people the right to speak their mind, unless it falls within the realm you deem acceptable. Clearly the risk of imposing ideology is much greater than you'd like to admit. Also, the ideology you propose is self contradictory garbage. Derision and devaluation are a part of that full spectrum of being. Throwing them out…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:53 AM
3

For all this talk of redefining masculinity, you don't seem to understand what it is. It's a fairly simple concept, being the things we associate with men. Some of those things are directly physical attributes, like reproductive organs, stature or bone structure. And others are things men do or are interested in, like, sports, cars or body building. These are the types of things you are talking about redefining. So how do you change these perceptions when they are rooted in reality? There are tw…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:56 PM
7

To say that marriage was better for men or women, is fundamentally flawed. You end up waffling around whether childbirth or back breaking labor is worse when the two aren't really comparable. The whole thing is a subjective mess with no real answers. Personally I suspect that the primary beneficiaries of marriage were actually children rather than either of the parents. It wouldn't be so common across cultures if it didn't help perpetuate the species.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 01:04 AM
1

Is something wrong?
/r/MensRights17/05/25 04:25 AM
4

It's about granting people the same rights and social treatment, despite immutable differences like gender. Does this mean you advocate for the abolishment of women's sports?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:35 AM
4

If you asked mothers and fathers why the father isn't in the picture, most would blame the other party. People tend to not want to accept their failings so that kind of polling will never match reality.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 03:34 AM
1

Some of them do, but I kinda doubt that's the case here. She starts the blog with an account of her hitch hiking after all.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:27 AM
1

How can u be fighting for equality when you not only have it but endless privileges. That's the question I've been answering. Value is subjective. When feminists do their equality calculations they use their values and not yours. That's how they can genuinely fight for equality while you see it as a fight for more privilege.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:23 AM
12

Claiming that someone is trying to poison you in the middle of the woods is a pretty strange thing to do. Bailing out and reporting to the authorities is a pretty reasonable response in that situation. While the post title is a bit clickbaity, the contents read as a pretty dry journal entry. It's not some feminist screed trying to villify men due to this one interaction. Personally I think this article is a non-issue.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 08:02 PM
1

Well, since the only evidence of your argument is my perception of it, and perception isn't reality. Then I guess your argument isn't real. Normally I'd ignore such imaginary things, but I just want to add: Pretending to be something you're not can only confer status if what you are pretending to be does so.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:12 AM
2

Traditionally men's status comes from strength. They wouldn't receive that place of status without some form of strength to accompany it.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 11:40 PM
0

The reason you view it that way is because you don't hold feminist values. From their perspective the benefits they receive are compensation for the disadvantages men supposedly impose on them. By their values they are fighting for equality. The big issue is that those values aren't based on something that's true.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 11:28 PM
2

It's not that hard to study. You work with the victims not the narcissists. They are the ones it's supposed to help. I suspect the lack of research has more to do with the state of academia than the difficulty of the subject.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 11:47 PM
3

Is there any data supporting the efficacy of grey rocking? Last time I looked it seemed like the evidence was anecdotal.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 06:07 AM
3

Sure you can do the math all you want, but do you think that will persuade someone who doesn't understand it? At that point its basically "trust me bro" and feminists already have their minds made up on who is trustworthy.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 09:41 PM
-14

They aren't opposed to equality, they're just bad at math. Not surprising considering they only pay attention to half the equation.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 08:21 PM
2

I don't think feminism is necessary anywhere. The issues it covers can be adequately covered by other philosophies instead of being needlessly gendered. The issue in your second point for instance, is actually a lack of liberty rather than some subjective evaluation of equality between the sexes.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 08:17 PM
5

They believe in collective guilt. The sins of the father are passed down to his sons.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 06:31 PM
0

Thomas Sowell
/r/MensRights20/04/25 06:59 PM
3

While that's true, I don't think programing would be what it is today if it hadn't switched over to a masculine occupation.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 02:29 AM
2

Someone who generally knows what they're talking about wouldn't try to make the claim that radical feminism is the same amount of bullshit as Men's Right's. I agree, men's rights has done nothing like terrorizing the woman who opened the first shelter for domestic abuse out of her country. For that level of bullshit, you have to look to the feminists.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 12:36 AM
2

It's not really a problem just like horror isn't a problem. People can tell that there's a difference between fantasy and reality.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 11:31 PM
10

Can you link the study?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 08:39 PM
4

Female genital mutilation
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:58 AM
8

Yea, there is a huge difference. Female mutilation is banned while male mutilation is accepted and encouraged. Also anyone who was mutilated as an infant has no frame of reference to compare. Imagine explaining to a Female Genital Mutilation victim what it feels like to be whole.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:25 AM
17

It's possible to get a replacement for your birth certificate if you need to.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 06:08 PM
22

So you either think forcing people to have sex is not rape or women are incapable of having sex. Either way it's morally reprehensible.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:33 AM
26

Presuming you are referring to the drunken sex scenario, no it does not logically follow that the determination of MTP being rape is linked. The primary factor for evaluating the drunken sex scenario is whether the alcohol negates consent. A factor wholly absent from the MTP scenario. To put it simply, the effect of alcohol on the validity of consent has no bearing on a scenario where no consent was given in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:24 AM
39

Probably made to penetrate. It's how women rape men. A very different issue from the moving goalposts of consent.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 01:58 AM
2

I personally support Egalitarianism in the context if it provides equal opportunity to everyone. I think this is a very poor way of describing what you seem want. I think you want people to have the liberty to choose their own path in life, not be forced to conform to some subjective notion of equality. Arguments for equality get used to justify those 50-50 types. You're not going to get the liberty if the 50-50s are using the government to enforce their arbitrary measure of equality.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 01:16 AM
2

There is no justice without due process.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:43 AM
10

I hope when they're making the father departments they keep feminists far away from them.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 04:13 AM
10

Is it really a transplant if they take part of an organ out then put it back in?
/r/MensRights09/04/25 04:10 AM
1

Sort of. Masculinity does include physical features such as primary and secondary sexual characteristics. But that's the least important subset of it.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 02:03 AM
5

Sure, but it's pretty much inevitable for civilians to die in war. They die as collateral damage, from faulty intel or when logistics and infrastructure is hit. It's one of the reasons why war is undesirable.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 01:59 AM
86

Now? Killing civilians is as old as war. That's not something you can really prevent.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 07:38 PM
24

A man is an adult human male. It's a pretty simple concept. Masculinity is more complex being the things we associate with men. That can vary with time and place. You can think of it as the stereotype of men and not be far off.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 07:33 PM
2

One thing I found suprizing is how pervasive the narrative of "these guys just bring in a bunch of dumb women to their podcasts to bully them for content" is just around the internet. The assumption being that if they brought on smart or average ladies onto their podcasts that these guys would be destroyed in their debates. I think you are looking at the criticism in the wrong way. Ending up on these types of podcast doesn't absolve them of their personal failings any more than being granted a D…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 04:03 AM
4

I don't think it's some spin-off group, you can find anti-male rhetoric all the way back in the deceleration of sentiments. It's quite pervasive throughout the history of the movement.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 06:41 AM
6

Feminists are capable of having a schizm over the trans woman question, but can't have one over hatting men. Doesn't seem like the hatred of men is contrary to feminism to me.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 08:35 PM
3

I don't know how they do these types of operations, but if their bait only features little girls it'd skew the results quite a bit.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:56 AM
2

I don't think that explains all of the disparity. It's quite large after all. Other factors like how they catch these people and the disparity in punishing sexual abuse probably affect it as well.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:53 AM
1

Why the non answer? You'd either call the leaders of apartheid South Africa nazis or you wouldn't. It shouldn't be too difficult to explain why someone is or is not a nazi based on their policy.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:31 AM
6

It certainly was incredibly effective.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 06:52 AM
3

Do you consider apartheid era South Africa to have been ruled by nazis?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 06:31 AM
0

So the only policy you cite is apartheid in South Africa. That's not actually a nazi policy. Racism and discriminatory laws existed in the region well before the nazis formed. If all it takes is racist policies to be a nazi then nazis have existed for all of human history. That's a bit too broad don't you think?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 03:26 AM
1

What nazi policies does he support?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 12:44 AM
1

Get men involved with educating children and get feminists out.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:32 PM
1

Given that it's probably going to take the form of censorship and doubling down on vilifying boys, yes we should be against it.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 10:33 AM
2

Women don't want a handout but she complains about the disbandment of chapters of the national society of women engineers in the military academies. If they want to compete on an even footing why do they need an organization to cater to them?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 10:17 AM
122

This could all backfire badly. The reason some boys fall under the spell of creeps such as Tate is because they feel so demeaned by mainstream society. And now, thanks to Adolescence, all they’re seeing is headline after headline about their “toxic masculinity”, about what a lethal menace they are. Hit the nail on the head right here. Tate is a solution* to the problem of how poorly the boys are treated. You're not going to make things better by vilifying them more. *a pretty terrible solution t…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:08 AM
2

I don't think an explanation as to why a group is vulnerable to a type of perpetrator implies the the group is responsible for their victimization. Even if that explanation is incorrect. If you get it right it's a very useful piece of information for developing countermeasures.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:50 AM
3

Technically she said that boys are easier targets than girls because they are horny. I don't think the data supports that but it's not particularly relevant to your outrage. There is a major problem with how people talk about sexual victimization in this age range. Typically these stats include all victims under the age of 18 but that's not a particularly accurate picture of the problem. If you look at the number of victim reports by age you see two distinct groups. First you have the prepubesce…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 09:02 AM
1

The maternal mortality rate isn't only deaths in labor. The CDC says its “the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes”. Your 48 hour based calculation fails to relate to the data in any meaningful way.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 08:01 AM
4

The suicide or murder disparity would be a better example. Those are comparing like to like. We already know the feminist excuses for those though.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:46 AM
1

Personally, I think its a solution along the same lines that alcohol and drugs are. Woks to an extent on the symptoms, but doesn't fix the problem and can cause other problems on it's own.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 07:58 AM
3

Something to note is this is only really a problem when the government is footing the bill for the education rather than the individual. If the woman pays she's the only one to suffer from having an expensive degree that she isn't using. Since it was paid for, the university is able to use that money to expand if there is a demand for doctors. When the government pays the number of doctors trained is constrained by the allocated funding. The burden of the woman's poor decision is born by the pub…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 07:48 AM
2

Could I get a source for those numbers? I'd like to read more about this.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 02:44 AM
1

In the West, suicide rates amongst men under 30 have risen by 40% since 2010. Suicide by males now accounts for as many deaths as breast cancer does for women. What's the source for this? It seems like a worthwhile read.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:50 AM
4

My theory is, it's because they surround themselves with male feminists.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:15 AM
1

It's not being used to determine policy; it's being used to push policy those politicians already want, just like any other form of propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:24 AM
13

im quite sure all of society would agree with me when we are children, we are told or shown that men are biologically stronger then women.. this is why dv seems like such a "male dominated" thing. Erin Pizzey opened the first domestic violence shelter for women. When she noticed that many women were also violent with their husbands, the feminists around her kicked her out of her organization and terrorized her until she had to flee the country. That was the turning point at which male DV victims…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 08:09 AM
7

I have my doubts too, but I figured it couldn't hurt to share her work. It might be new to someone here.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:11 AM
12

You might want to start with Cassie Jaye. Both her TED talk and her documentary, The Red Pill, would be useful to you. She was a feminist who decided to look into the men's rights movement much like you are doing here.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 03:48 AM
1

Over used in "the boy who cried wolf" sense. The similarities you want to convey don't come through because practically no one who gets called a nazi actually is.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 03:14 AM
1

I find the authors definitions a bit suspect as well. They seem very broad and unclear. Which makes sense given that the research doesn't seem to have a standard set of definitions, but that also makes it easier to mislead.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 11:29 AM
1

The studies they used as data have a wide range of estimates due to different methods and definitions. In other words what one study counts as sexual exploitation isn't the same as what another does. If two studies don't use the same scale it's hard to reliably compare them.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 10:48 AM
22

I think the main reason we stopped is that nazi accusations have been so over used that they don't really mean anything anymore.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:56 AM
11

Your first mistake was accepting the collective guilt the feminists are pushing on you.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:35 AM
0

There's most likely multiple studies referenced in the article but due to the nature of how it was written most are going to be impossible to find. I was able to find a Lancet study00329-8/abstract) that looks like one of the sources, but we'll never be certain. It doesn't look like a terribly good study either.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:30 AM
0

1 in 8 children affected by image based sexual abuse is larger than the more general 1 in 12 subjected to sexual abuse. Both of those figures can't be true in the same context. It says there are four sub-types of online child sexual exploitation but only gives three. It also claims to measure world wide but omits large parts of Africa and Asia. Kinda odd when it cites researchers from a Chinese agricultural university as a source. The sources the AI drew from might be good, but we'll never know …
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:08 AM
1

That article is trash. It contradicts itself in the first few sentences, has no way to identify the study it's taking about and is unable to count to 3. None of this is particularly surprising considering it was written by an AI. this is not the quality of information that should be passed around.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 08:07 PM
16

Hoe_math's video on levels comes to mind.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 07:33 AM
9

Here is a report on violence against children (age 13-17). On page 22 they talk about relationship abuse. The boys had a higher report rate in all of these categories. The fact that your school neglected this side of things is unsurprising. Such institutions typically follow feminist doctrine which ignores male suffering at best.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:31 AM
5

They probably don't talk to their grandmothers, They're old and set in their patriarchal ways.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:37 AM
14

It's not surprising. The manoshpere is just men talking about men with other men, which promotes male bonding. These feminist outlets can't abide by that as the patriarchy exists within male bonds.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:33 AM
3

One of the major ways men compete for wives is through resource acquisition. If a society disposes of it's men, they lose a disproportionate amount of their productive capacity. This is probably why marriage is so ubiquitous in human history, it keeps more of the male population in the game and productive. Disposability is really a last resort. He can't be productive and induce competitive productivity if he's dead.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:19 AM
2

After a screening questionnaire, eligible participants were invited to consent to the 21-day online diary study. Each evening at 8 pm EST, enrolled participants were emailed a link to a Qualtrics survey where they were asked to reflect on their romantic and sexual experiences in the 24 hours since their last survey. Participants reported number of sexual encounters and the nature, duration, and quality of each activity, in addition to our three OGP measures. Participants who reported an orgasm a…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:58 AM
4

In theory it's the journal's job to weed out things like this. Maybe they need an audit to show they're actually as prestigious as they think they are.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:55 AM
3

The data presented is from a survey, reports show even less men compared to women. That said the past 12 months incidence and the lifetime incidence also differ in ratio. With the 12 month being the most even.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 09:36 AM
6

IIRC it was a feminist rewrite of mein Kampf. Look up the grievance studies affair.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 11:30 PM
1

The law they tried to repeal prevents discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:44 PM
4

The anti-male rhetoric you hear isn’t from the Democratic Party, it’s from individuals, and it’s not reflected in their policy. The Democrats in California tried to repeal) their anti discrimination law in the name of ending discrimination. Sex is one of the factors that is protected. It's not just individuals.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:50 AM
11

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support
/r/MensRights03/03/25 08:53 AM
4

We don't congratulate female victims for getting raped though. Do you not see how the difference in treatment would yield a lower rate of reporting for male victims?
/r/MensRights01/03/25 09:56 PM
8

society doesn't treat male rape victims well. That hypothetical male gang rape victim is going to keep quiet because he most likely to receive a congratulations rather than sympathy.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:12 AM
1

If they have artificial wombs and some way to make viable embryos from men, they likely can produce women as well. Men do contain the genetic information to make a woman. If the genetic mixing works like it does in natural reproduction. half will be male, a quarter will be female and the last quarter will be whatever results from the YY configuration. So this hypothetical all male civilization either avoids producing females on purpose or their tech is a form of cloning. Either way you get a ver…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:43 AM
-3

I don't really care how you want to divide such superficial categories. None of them will accurately represent an individual. There is no black person who has faced oppression ever since the slave trade.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:57 AM
0

If the issue is unequal wealth, why bother bringing skin color into it? That's never going to be an accurate measure of need.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 04:53 AM
1

Cultural Normativity: The dominant cultural narratives and standards in the United States are based on white male experiences, shaping everything from beauty ideals to societal expectations. Why are you ignoring women's contributions to American society?
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:46 AM
23

DEI and Affirmative Action are the same thing, an attempt to rectify the discrimination of the past with more discrimination. It's the same bad idea repeated. The reason they have to rebrand periodically is discrimination isn't all that popular in the US.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:34 AM
1

A book about Trump is a bad example though. He's a popular and controversial figure, That's the exact type of thing that gets people talking. It's not particularly surprising to see a book about him to sell well.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:31 PM
2

Nah, we don't agree about a "dictatorship " taking root in the US either. That's a bizarre misunderstanding of the situation that's oddly common nowadays. There's nothing odd about that. It's just a result of the news outlets switching over to propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:23 PM
1

Pregnancy preventive in third world countries is a lot different than "30 million spent on Condoms in Gaza" Why would the US want to prevent the third world from reproducing?
/r/MensRights22/02/25 04:34 AM
3

So what? Do you expect them to subdue a thief by shooting them or running over them?
/r/MensRights22/02/25 04:16 AM
2

Your own source points out that the Texas government does not think treating the woman would have been against the law. They even decided to clarify things to prevent this from happening again. I don't really get how you think this is going to be standard practice. A standard course of medical treatment sounds like it falls under the exercise of reasonable medical judgement to me.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 08:53 AM
1

I don't think that works at the high school level. Students there are still expected to obey the teachers and staff even if they aren't directly responsible for their education.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 10:58 AM
3

(a) A person may not knowingly perform, induce, or attempt an abortion. (b) The prohibition under Subsection (a) does not apply if: (1) the person performing, inducing, or attempting the abortion is a licensed physician; (2) in the exercise of reasonable medical judgment, the pregnant female on whom the abortion is performed, induced, or attempted has a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from a pregnancy that places the female at risk of death or poses a ser…
/r/MensRights15/02/25 10:32 AM
1

Investigators believe they identified "claims farmers" who are alleged to have approached adults who were former young offenders, inmates, and school students, to encourage them to file fake claims for historic child sex abuse. Most of these are likely criminal men trying to game the system. It's really not reflective of claims in general.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:49 AM
2

Feminist must have a really low opinion of women if they think they can be oppressed for thousands of years without violently fighting back.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 04:07 AM
1

Wait, what do you mean "If boys and girls reported at the same rate those two ratios would be the same."? You think boys and girls experience it at the same rate? This comparison doesn't imply any specific ratio of victims. If reports were a 60/40 split and the survey results also show a 60/40 split, it's likely that the real ratio is indeed 60/40. If instead you get a 50/50 split from the survey then one group is going to have a different rate of reporting than the other. Sure a lot goes unrepo…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 03:54 AM
1

The difference in victim ratios between surveys and reports is indeed huge. If boys and girls reported at the same rate those two ratios would be the same. The facts of the police reports are misleading. An accurate analysis shouldn't rely on them.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 10:39 PM
10

To be clear you are complaining about a 0.0223% chance of death per live birth. This is bad compared to some other countries but I wouldn't call those odds terrible.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 03:18 AM
2

Some would say "well male students don't report", a lot of female students don't either and that does not explain the insane statistics that even though 20% of teachers are male, around 89% of cases have a male perpetrator. Those are very telling numbers. Male students being less likely to report could very easily explain the discrepancy. Survey data tends to give a very different ratio of male to female victims compared to police reports in this type of crime.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 11:32 PM
2

Feminist have explicitly said that male bonding produces the patriarchy before.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 10:38 AM
9

That's an interesting result. Either there's some neurological system separate from whatever determines sexuality, or there's a whole bunch of political lesbians in the data.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 10:25 AM
2

The alcohol page says it can be harmful. It even explains that not all babies will suffer from adverse effects. Sure we know more about the effects of alcohol on babies than we do cannabis, but that's more due to the fact that most mothers aren't stupid enough to take illegal drugs while pregnant. Alcohol is a much more widespread and socially acceptable drug, therefore we have better data for it.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 04:40 AM
1

The issue with sterilization is you can't trust the government with it and these sorts of women (and men for that matter) don't typically have the forethought to go through with it. A lack of forethought is typically how people get in these sorts of situations to begin with.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 05:48 AM
4

Funny how you cry about my ignorance but a simple search will show that the CDC doesn't think pregnant women should be on it.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 05:39 AM
121

They suggest that this discrepancy stems from gendered socialization patterns: men are less likely to cultivate strong, emotionally supportive friendships or family ties outside of romantic relationships Perhaps if feminists weren't so adamant in destroying the places men would form such relationships, this wouldn't be such a problem.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 12:58 AM
6

Also the article said the mom in question had 'cannabis' in her system, so if you think she needs to have her kid taken away for that you are REALLY off your rocker here. In other words she subjected her baby to harmful drugs while they were still in the womb. Would you say it's off your rocker to hold a dim view of mothers who drink alcohol during pregnancy too?
/r/MensRights28/01/25 12:48 AM
1

Now it's not clear how old the students were but the reports all keep referring to them as juveniles leading me to believe most were very young, pre teen or younger. The linked article says 100 teens. It doesn't mention the DUI but that implies at least 15 years old. That's the age for a learner's permit in Florida. Mid to late teens seems like the most likely age range.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 12:38 AM
5

I think it's about expectations. Men were raised to not expect things from society while women were told they can have it all and they don't need to compromise. Only one of theses lines up with what actually happens. The whole discrimination thing is an attempt to make the fantasy a reality, but it'll never work because society is too complex to effectively engineer like that.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 12:32 AM
5

Conclusion: Gender Equality means talking equality while doing discrimination. That seems to be a common theme with equality movements.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 10:11 AM
4

These stereotypes contribute to the issues you have mentioned such as men going to jail longer, taking on more dangerous jobs, and losing custody battles Feminists often push for more lenient treatment of female criminals and cover up the abuse perpetrated by women. Arbitrary sex quotas in various job fields is a feminist grift, it's really not a problem most of the time. Prior to mothers getting default custody in a divorce, the children were the father's responsibility. Feminists changed that.…
/r/MensRights26/01/25 10:04 AM
2

Why focus on the past or who to blame rather than trying to change the present? Because they are socialists who believe in collective guilt.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 09:39 AM
1

True, but I don't think war fixing the birth rate is a particularly good incentive to have.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 06:51 AM
1

I wouldn't call the smaller conflicts not real wars, it's very real to the subject of the bullying. You are correct that something like a ground war against china would be different but I don't think that needs conscripts either. That conflict only happens after the missiles and bombs have decided the outcome, at which point any large ground formations are just bombed. That just leaves smaller holdouts that are better dealt with using the professionals.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 06:49 AM
7

I don't think drafting women is feasible. They can just get pregnant to get out of it. Abolishing it is the way to go.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:48 AM
1

You cant wage a real war without conscription. Sure you can, the US has done it for decades.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:46 AM
5

Only if they are removed because they are female. Feminist doesn't mean the same thing as woman so they should be good on that front.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:16 AM
1

So practically none are capable of committing rape in the UK. In terms of percentages at least.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:58 PM
1

How many women have a penis to penetrate with?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:43 PM
1

You'd think that would be obvious but it is not. What is the definition?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:23 PM
10

If those women are in prison for child abuse, wouldn't that affect be a good thing?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 10:41 AM
3

Just because 2 thirds claim to be victims of dv don’t make it true. Even if it is true that doesn't absolve them of whatever crime that got them locked away in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 10:39 AM
1

What's the UK's definition of rape? Does it cover a woman forcing a man to have sex with her?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 10:14 AM
9

Welcome to the world of strange fetishes. I'll spare you the cursed knowledge and just recommend not going in past your feet. It gets way worse.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 09:48 AM
0

A fantasy is not the same as reality. You can't treat them as though they are the same. A horror movie is not the same as a snuff film, even if they are superficially similar.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 09:44 AM
4

Right so gender is pretty much just stereotypes, and sex is an important biological characteristic. I don't understand why people insist on elevating the significance of stereotypes, they really aren't that important.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 09:24 AM
3

Mail in voting is for the general public to vote for their representatives, propositions, and a variety of other public offices. Remote voting is for the legislature to vote on bills to pass to the president for approval. It's apparently unconstitutional by some interpretation so they might need an amendment rather than a bill to get it through.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:48 AM
2

It's possible that it is. Movies do make mistakes like that. Another possibility is it's a bit beyond what you'll tolerate in a movie. They can be too much for some people sometimes. I haven't seen the movie so cant comment on the former. The latter is of course subjective and with no wrong answer. That's up to you to decide.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:43 AM
2

Are you seriously trying to argue that greater strength has no effect on job incentives for physically demanding jobs?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 11:02 AM
5

In the raw data of Table 2, women are noticeably less likely than men to say they are in a job where they negotiate wages. The figure for males is approximately 48%; the figure for females is approximately 33%. So women are in fact noticeably less likely to ask for a pay raise. We also examined the idea that women act less assertively in negotiations for fear of upsetting the relationship with their boss or colleagues Is fear of workplace drama the only reason for someone to be less assertive?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:30 AM
2

Yeesh you clearly have never worked a physically demanding job in your life. Or seen any sport for that matter. Strength is a noncontroversial difference between men and women much like pregnancy is. It's applicable to many careers that are male dominated like sports, construction, and maintenance. Also if I have the wrong idea about what you mean perhaps it would be better to explain rather than complain.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:03 AM
2

You went from "it's all nurture" to "we have to eradicate the natural differences through society" real fast. What do you think should be done about the strength difference?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 09:15 AM
8

When someone sees people as groups first, racism is inevitable.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:02 AM
10

Honestly, a scene depicting the sexual assault of a man by a woman as horrible is probably a good thing. That's much better than it being played for laughs or treated as something normal.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:25 PM
2

The answer to nature or nurture is obviously both. We can see this in animals through domestication and taming. The same is true of humans. You correctly note that there are differences in culture but are ignoring the rather obvious differences in biology. Just look at pregnancy. That causes rather considerable inconvenience to the expecting mother. If she want's to have children as most people do, her career has to be either doable while pregnant or accommodating of taking a break. Those consid…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:16 PM
4

If I tell you that the Illuminati control society to oppress people I'd rightly be called crazy. Somehow it's different when it's the patriarchy doing the control and oppression.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:05 AM
1

This dominant form of masculinity emphasizes distancing from behaviors perceived as feminine, such as seeking help or expressing vulnerability, and promotes traits such as emotional restraint, physical dominance, and aggression Funny how masculinity supposedly discourages seeking help but the most popular sports are all based on teamwork. Does anyone actually think NFL players are less masculine because the help each other?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:59 AM
2

Being more productive doesn't make you privileged. It's directing the output that does. Women control most consumer spending. I don't think forcing people into jobs they don't want is a good way to go. Men and women choose different jobs because the inherently have different incentives. Trying to counteract that just leads to discrimination and failure.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:48 AM
5

The problem with that logic is there are masculine and feminine physical features. Saying that a dick is a performance is rather questionable.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 03:32 AM
5

It's a stupid argument that hurts both men and women.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:06 AM
1

YOU literally presented a scenario of a man preferring art BECAUSE of hot women and then said this is reasonable. I stand by that statement. Art is a pretty broad category with many different mediums. There's room for more than one preference. Men tend to prefer video over text for instance. Both can include sexy women. I DID NOT say that people only see art in a purely sexual manner. Oh really? what's this then? Also, you can appreciate art that aligns with your sexuality. But it feels regressi…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:24 AM
2

Actually if I down vote it'll probably be for your hydra style of replying. It's quite annoying when you feel the need to make multiple replies when one would be sufficient. Keep in mind that many men often have no other comparable metric between preferences for artists when considering gender besides "she's hot" If you cut out all variables other than sex of course you are going to get very basic answers like that. It's like asking "all else being equal do you prefer a turkey burger or a normal…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 07:36 AM
1

Nobody in this conversation has claimed to see art in a purely sexual manner. That's just something you made up.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 06:31 AM
2

People have the right to their own preferences in art. Just because you create a straw-man whom you don't want to engage with does not invalidate that fact.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 03:33 AM
2

The problem with that is liking sexy women is not the same as hating men.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 03:30 AM
3

But sometimes, what you're ascribing to your sexuality is just good ole misandry and you don't even know it. Let's not copy the feminist's paranoia. A man preferring art because it's full of sexy women is a perfectly reasonable explanation. There is a large body of works that can attest to this kind of preference.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 02:41 AM
1

On the sentencing side of things you can fix this by changing the law so crimes carry non-variable penalties based on the acts committed. As a bonus you'd get rid of sexism there too. Other parts of the justice system would retain their issues, but it would improve things.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 09:20 AM
1

Those stats you used are like complaining that a beer is too expensive because it's 12 ounces. It's not sufficient information to evaluate if it is a shitty deal. That divorce stat would be a negligible risk at a divorce rate of 0.001% but highly concerning at a 90% divorce rate. You just don't know if all you are provided is the ratio of the sexes.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:28 AM
1

70% of women file for divorce and take half your shit. also, 70% of NON-reciprocated violence comes from a woman, in heterosexual relationships. why aren't men scared to sleep with their wives? This is the same type of fearmongering that you are complaining about. An accurate assessment of the risk of these outcomes needs to take into account the rate at which they occur. The sex ratio of the perpetrators doesn't do that. Your point probably still stands but these are not the stats to use.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:12 AM
6

They tax everyone equally according to income, not according to if you have a family at home. Doesn’t matter If a single mom has 6 kids at home to care for, she is expected to pay her share of taxes. Not true.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 06:52 AM
2

The only way "gestational slavery" would be an accurate description of an abortion ban is if women are incapable of bearing responsibility for their actions. That's infantilizing and demeaning to women. You must have a very low opinion of women to say something like that.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 04:14 AM
2

Movements for equality probably always result in supremacy. Hierarchy is the natural state so to have equality you have to form on organization to impose it on everyone. That just results in a different hierarchy, defeating the point of equality. To make things worse this new hierarchy is formed to impose on people so it's very easy for those with authority to turn it to their own ends.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 07:04 AM
4

Identity politics are the cause of the left's incoherence.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:55 AM
2

That's not true. Do a quick search. You'll find plenty of egg banks.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:37 AM
5

The system is doing exactly what it was intended to do. By commenting on a "wrong think" sub you demonstrated that you are willing to engage with "forbidden" ideas. Can't have you corrupting the "safe spaces" with something icky like new ideas or reality. Thus you are no longer welcome in the cult clubhouse.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 09:58 AM
4

Trump was criticized by some of the Republicans for a gay wedding at Mar-a-lago. He's certainly not as anti gay as the left would have you think.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:07 AM
1

Probably Total Fertility Rate.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:58 AM
3

Their own sample found about 60% of these men didn't really conform to the supposed masculine norms. That should be a massive red flag as either the sample is horribly biased or the definition of masculinity has little to do with men.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:51 AM
1

School vouchers are a good thing. They tie funding to the number of students served and give parents more choice in where they send their children. New York's charter schools operate on a similar funding system. They're popular enough that they have to hold lotteries to determine enrollment. They get better results too. Why keep a school system that functions poorly when there are known better alternatives?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:02 AM
1

Yes, let's pay the schools that do the worst job more. That will surely convince them to change their ways. These are the exact organizations that need to be allowed to fail so they can be replaced by more competitive options.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 05:18 AM
3

It's not just higher education, k-12 is arguably worse. Some of those are graduating students with abysmal literacy rates.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:08 AM
3

Equality doesn't matter, liberty does.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:59 AM
5

Feminism is about true equality, and I really believe that most Feminists are working towards that goal, me included. This reminds me of the phrase "true communism has never been tried". Unfortunately for both the feminists and the communists, equality is impossible. You'll always have inequalities that stem from individual choice and if you take away that choice say hello to tyranny. It's what you get for trying to make things equal.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:29 AM
23

Personally, I doubt this rebrand comes with a change in mindset. They're most likely going to keep pushing the ideology under a new name.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 09:26 AM
74

There's no such thing as reverse racism. It's just racism. The primary issue with education is that there's no mechanism for garbage schools to fail. They get students and funding regardless of their performance. It's not an issue that can be fixed by throwing more money at it.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 09:08 AM
206

They're replacing "DEI" with "belonging." So it's a rebrand to avoid backlash.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:53 AM
2

There's a report on male suicide from Australia that I can't find anymore hat had one of saddest phrases I've ever come across. It was a long the lines of "suicide is a rational solution to many men's problems". it always comes to mind when I think about mental health because it implied that a lot of men's mental health problems are not actually mental problems.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 02:02 AM
5

Gearheart was involved with developing women's and gender studies programs. That's a pretty influential position to be in with feminism.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 09:57 AM
14

Eh, it's not like we haven't had political lesbianism in the west before.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 08:27 AM
6

“The main takeaway is that both male and female students experience a beauty premium when teaching is in person,” Mehic explained. “But for females, this effect disappears with online teaching. This, at least to me, suggests that the beauty premium for males is due to some productivity-related factors, such as higher self-confidence, while for women, it’s more likely caused by discrimination.” Seems that things are different between the sexes.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 07:52 AM
1

Strictly speaking my position is that they won't become a barren waste that only supports microbial life. As for the forests, from what I understand, the effects of climate change will have aren't well understood. Redwoods are growing faster with increased temperatures and there are groves in Hawaii that see average highs about 9c higher than their native range. It's not really clear what that means in the face of global warming though. Of course that could be a moot point if we decide to cultiv…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:59 PM
1

Animals can’t naturally migrate to areas more hospitable to their needs at the rate and speed at which the climate is warming. Funnily enough we have an example of animals doing just that. Tropical fish appear in temperate waters where they're warmed by the waste heat of a nuclear power plant. You're also ignoring generalist whose range extends over a large range of temperatures. Coyotes for instance live in both Death Valley and San Fransisco do you think they'll just evaporate if San Fransisco…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:15 AM
1

There actually isn't a lake in death valley. It is a desert after all. More relevant is the temperature. It sees highs up to 48c. We know that multicellular life can as a minimum withstand those temperatures. Now compare that to someplace like San Fransisco which gets highs of 21c. Even if you increase San Fransisco's temperature by 10c it's still well within the temperatures for multicellular life. That city isn't even particularly cold. So no, multicellular life isn't fucked, you are just a do…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:04 AM
11

Why did they handle a criminal matter in a civil court? Is a fine really the punishment we want for sexual assault?
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:51 AM
4

i also want to add that the chances of a man being falsely accused and actually going to prison for it is completely incomparable to the chances of a woman being raped. The fear of a conviction isn't the issue. Social consequences are the real threat. Those don't even need a police report.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:34 AM
1

I think your assessment of college is overly optimistic, but that's a different discussion. I do generally agree with you on the effects of the bailout, although it's worse than you said. These types of policies effectively add currency to the economy, they're inflationary in nature. Inflation hits the poor the hardest so it's taking things from the poor to give to the middle class. Robin hood it is not. And that's not even getting into the ethics of how close it is to buying votes. The policy i…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:54 AM
2

I've heard that there really aren't any cases where an abortion would save the life of the mother, but that's largely irrelevant as the pro-lifers aren't against an exception for medical necessity.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:13 AM
6

Don't you hate it when the government subsidizes people's bad decisions?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 07:07 AM
2

Ah, yes more climate doomerism. Just so you know, there are fish in death valley which are descended from the fish living in a lake that disappeared with the end of the last ice age. Multicellular life will be fine.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:58 AM
1

Not to my knowledge, but I wouldn't be surprised if he said something similar.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:43 AM
5

The planet will be fine. It's been through worse.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:37 PM
3

Given that there are a number of states that legalized full term abortions I'm not so sure that "they want to kill babies" is bullshit. I don't see much difference between a newborn baby and a "fetus" one day prior to birth. At that point you're granting personhood based on where they are. Seems like a rather odd way to define a person to me.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:35 PM
3

The feminists certainly thought the grid girls would be more attractive if they didn't have their own opinions. That's why they went out of their way to force them to make the right choice. Kinda odd that a movement that's supposedly for women's liberty is telling them what they can and can't do though.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:26 AM
2

You're a bit off in your assessment of socialism. It can't prove equality of outcome either. it centralizes power in the government which provides an excellent mechanism for anyone who wants to get ahead to control the people. since such people exist, it's inevitable that one will take over simply because no government is immune to corruption. So your choice is really between liberty with inequality or slavery with even more inequality.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:36 PM
12

Hollywood trying to construct healthier visions of the future is how we got into this mess in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 03:45 AM
14

That's the thing though, they aren't doing this to make money.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 03:42 AM
18

Feminism does not have a monopoly on equality.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:32 AM
4

why do they always conflate Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 11:43 PM
35

Technically speaking, bra size and hip width are a function of her weight as fat will build up in those areas too.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:08 AM
1

The left have been calling Trump a fascist threat to democracy. Odd how that lines up with your claims. As for the supposed propaganda I've consumed, all I did was check the election results and refresh my memory on the amendment process. If you think that's right wing propaganda then I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:25 AM
-16

Please tell me that's sarcasm. it's hard to tell with text.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:09 AM
1

Gaza would be a good location for a resort. It has Mediterranean beaches and is close to many culturally significant sites. It would also bring jobs to the locals and the influx of money could be used for civic projects. Such a plan would improve life in Gaza. The main issue is Hamas would rather launch rockets at Israel instead of taking care of their people.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:04 AM
1

I just haven't been uncritically swallowing the left's propaganda.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:54 PM
1

No, I don't. The executive branch has nothing to do with choosing the people who make these decisions. Even if he can remove people somehow they'll just be replaced by similarly minded people. Also keep in mind that the ratification stage requires a functioning state legislature to make it law. Removing people disrupts that. Constitutional amendments are not something you can just weasel into law.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:02 AM
2

Women's right to vote isn't going to be repealed. They'd need to win a two thirds vote in both the house and the senate and get 3/4 of the states to ratify it. That's just not happening in the current political climate.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:36 AM
2

"We proudly stand for families and Life. We believe that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees that no person can be denied Life or Liberty without Due Process, and that the States are, therefore, free to pass Laws protecting those Rights. After 51 years, because of us, that power has been given to the States and to a vote of the People. We will oppose Late Term Abortion, while supporting mothers and policies that advance Prenatal Care, access to Birth Control, a…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:13 AM
0

IIRC there's something like 7 states where abortion is legal for the full term of pregnancy.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:51 AM
1

There's an interesting difference in the examples you give. Demoncrat and libtard are obviously made up to insult whereas fascist and nazi are not. They have meaning beyond just saying "I hate you" and don't actually insult the people who follow those ideologies. It's only an insult to those who find such ideologies abhorrent.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:58 AM
10

Honestly, some physical traits are a good indicator of someones lifestyle. Muscle and fat in particular.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:09 AM
0

This is just "video games cause boys to be violent" except aimed a girls. Given the lack of evidence for that connection despite decades of trying, I doubt that the fictional media they consume is the issue.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:02 AM
4

The anti-hamas Palestinians are on the West Bank of the Jordan River and have no control over the Gaza strip. A far as I'm aware they aren't actively involved in this war. Negotiating with them isn't going to do anything. They've been a separate political entity for quite some time.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:01 PM
2

The difficulty here is you have to look at how cases are ruled to determine how the law is being interpreted.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:35 AM
0

Hitler did use the communists/marxists to gain power. That's how he managed it comparatively peacefully and why he had to reeducate or eliminate them once he was in power. He did it again with the soviets in the early parts of the war. Really their beliefs are remarkably similar. The Nazis, communists and fascists all have much more in common with each other than they do with liberalism.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:45 AM
8

Feminism to me, and by dictionary definition means “the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.” so most feminists talk about things like the wage gap, abortion, and sa. Which in my opinion are the most hot topics. Besides women’s rights, one of the most frustrating things I see in Feminist media is the lack of empathy for men. The wage gap is a result of women's choices, to get rid of it you need to force women to make different ones. I don't think invalidating per…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:06 AM
7

1913 is old enough that the copyright has expired. If anyone wants to read it Project Gutenburg has a copy.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:32 AM
8

if a lot of these social changes coming and staying with feminism put some models for women to follow like the bossgirl, wouldn't those same events change what women find attractive in men? Only if what women find attractive in men is solely the result of their social environment. This social constructionist view is common in the feminist movement which explains the tactics they use, but I don't think it reflects reality.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:44 AM
13

He's not. Fascist has had it's meaning so eroded that all it really means is they think he's a bad guy. Quite frankly Trump has less in common with the fascists than the democrat's do. It's just a smear to rile up their base so they go vote against him.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:28 AM
9

There's also the possibility that they look a what feminism thinks of men and go "yep, that's me".
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:25 PM
1

Today I learned that being the president of the United States isn't work.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:07 PM
8

You do realize that it was Italy that was fascist and not Germany right? Germany had it's own shitty brand of socialism.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:53 PM
3

Becoming a community father figure would be a good thing. This would normally take the form of volunteering for some type of youth organization. Unfortunately the ones designed for the boys, who need it the most these days, get dismantled by feminists to smash the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:39 PM
2

I wouldn't make the assumption that teen pregnancies are a result of rape. In the US most states will recognize consent between at least some teenagers. 16 is the most common age of consent, but with age difference restrictions that can be lower. It's a poor choice at that age but not an illegal one.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:28 PM
1

I heard somewhere that show lowered the teenage pregnancy rate.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:12 PM
8

I like how she says men lie about women liking bad guys then later points out that "serial unalivers" have families to claim it's easy dating as a man.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:29 PM
2

I think this is mostly due to the election. It brings out the "left vs right" in people.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:32 AM
1

As someone who would traditionally fall under the ‘feminist’ bracket but personally prefers the lesser used term egalitarian, I came on here expecting to eye roll but actually I find myself completely agreeing with most of what I read (with the exceptions of a few pretty wild claims but I’m sure I’m not alone in this group). This might fall under one of those wild claims you mentioned, but my opinion on equality has soured. The fundamental flaw is that equal is a value judgement and value is sub…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:48 AM
4

The issue isn't with the fascist feminists having platforms to speak. It's them gaining positions of power through the support of the more reasonable ones. This has already happened in many relevant countries like the US and the UK, resulting is discriminatory policies and laws.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:31 AM
1

It would be government funded in a country with socialized healthcare.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:40 PM
2

Trigonometry is probably an error. There's a YouTube channel called Triggernometry. They likely have a video on this subject.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:38 PM
1

Be prepared for mass confusion, none of them are going to know what to do in that situation. Please be understanding regardless of the reaction.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:47 AM
1

I think aiming to be more inclusive tends to lead to attempting to make things for everyone. Effectively it makes forgetting the target audience the goal. The extreme I described previously is obviously bad, but even if you don't go that far it degrades the quality. It's harder to hit the target when the goal is less clear.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 01:40 AM
3

That's pretty much what I said. It's just that most people who say entertainment should be inclusive actively shit on the target audience and try to replace them with what they call a modern audience. Which supposedly includes everyone. Then when the project does poorly they blame the guys they were shitting on. Clearly that's not what you mean here, but the first post used their language. One little quibble though. Offensive for the sake of being offensive really only occurs in low quality stor…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:30 AM
3

No, they absolutely think sexy women that appeal to men shouldn't exist. Why do you think they insist on making attractive women ugly when they are working on an existing franchise.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 11:33 PM
7

Generally if you try to make a story appeal to everyone it ends up satisfying no one. It's important to cater to a specific audience and since men and women have different tastes, you end up targeting one or the other. Sometimes you'll get fans of the sex you aren't targeting, but it's pointless to cater to these outliers. They like the thing for what it is, not because it's targeting them. This process isn't excluding people. Anyone can be a fan of something even if it's not made for everyone.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 11:18 PM
4

Patriarchy exists due to male bonding. To smash the patriarchy you need to eliminate the spaces where men can bond. Since men bond over shared interests movies, videogames and literature targeted at them must be subverted or destroyed. I really hate Sally Miller Gearheart. This isn't even the worst idea she's put forward, and she was a pioneer in the gender studies curriculum.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 10:59 PM
2

women's clothes are often less durable/made poorly so they need to be purchased more frequently (but are, on average, cheaper than their male counterparts..), women are more trend-oriented and therefore some may buy clothes that they soon lose interest in, etc. I feel like these two points are intrinsically linked.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 04:57 AM
7

A simple explanation would be that enough of them have embedded themselves in positions of power that they don't fear the backlash.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 04:48 AM
5

Why are you agreeing with the Nazis? Your own links paint them as the origin of the Jew-globalist connection. Given that there are plenty of examples of non-Jewish globalist movements why not throw the association in the bin with the rest of the Nazi trash.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 04:38 AM
5

Something to keep in mind is that prior to the reversal of Roe v Wade, the US abortion laws were much more lenient than those in Europe. I haven't looked into it recently but there are probably still a bunch of states where full term abortions are legal. There's also the issue of how they forced abortion to be legal. The judicial branch isn't supposed to make laws but that's pretty much what they did with Roe v Wade. Hence why it could be reversed simply because the supreme court changed. That's…
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:47 AM
0

That use of equity is relatively new though, the left has been pushing for their affirmative action policies far longer than they've used it. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the US has operated under a disparate impact standard since the sixties. That legal theory is based on outcomes despite the name of the commission. It seems to me that when they say equal, equality of outcome was always the goal.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:00 PM
-3

The communist goal of a classless society sounds pretty equal to me. There are similarities between the two ideologies. Complaints about "unpaid labor" sound like they're based on the labor theory of value for instance.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:09 AM
-5

You might want to check what the dictionary says about the meaning of those two terms. I think you'll find that a hell of a lot of conflation has been going on. But more to the point, equalizing outcomes is a valid interpretation of equality. Feminists are not lying when they say their movement id for the equality of women. That goal is just not as good as you were lead to believe.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:44 AM
-6

That is equality. Transferring wealth from those that have it to those that don't equalizes wealth. This type of thing requires oppression to enforce and it's never enough because value is subjective. Equality is fundamentally unjust, which is why you want liberty and justice rather than equality.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:41 AM
3

How can I fight for a cause that doesn’t seem willing to fight for me—and, in fact, works against my rights? This sounds like "how do I fight for a cause I don"t believe in" to me. The answer to that should be fairly straightforward.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:02 AM
15

Title IX and education reform are actually on Trumps platform.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 07:48 AM
2

it's in the link you shared. Just click "read more about the Trump Republican platform", you get a PDF with more specific information than the list on the website.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 04:45 PM
1

It's not. The nuclear family is based on genetic relations. I don't think we have the data on how homosexual families fare but they're at a disadvantage to start with as adopted children come with baggage.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:53 AM
2

MRA tend to focus more on the detrimental effects of divorce and child support, along with the bias of family court. The data does show that both parents are important for a child's well-being though so the idea of family structures that don't include the nuclear family don't seem very popular.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:21 AM
23

If you want a specific example they have a rollback of Biden's title IX regulations in there. More broadly, the education goals are likely to help boys, as demoralizing them is pretty popular in the left wing propaganda that Trump says he wants to get rid of.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 04:13 AM
1

The any two adults part.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:33 PM
6

The nuclear family isn't a religious or theological concept. You see it in animals quite frequently. Many birds have this sort of family structure for instance. Children lack the full set of rights that an adult has. Most of them are granted to the people most likely to care about their well-being. A lot of these can be understood in terms of property rights. It's not a bad way to codify things in the law. Remember that a dog is considered property but that's not an indication that it will be ab…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:41 AM
-2

What's the source on that?
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:16 AM
12

it really depends on the field. Physics is very fact based for instance. It's well supported due to it's use in engineering. Basically if we use the science to make something it's much more likely to be based on facts.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 01:40 PM
15

It doesn't take "progressive thinking" to advocate for equal rights. Christianity contains plenty of justification for it as well. A proper christian could probably go into more detail but it stems from the idea that all are equal in the eyes of god.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 10:31 AM
7

I'm not going to pretend to know your specific situation. It could be an outlier with no statistical significance for all I know. But if excessive porn use crops up in a relationship I would expect there to be underlying problems with that relationship to cause it. People don't seek alternatives is their wants are already being fulfilled.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 05:06 AM
8

Another factor I’ve seen is porn use. Men are at an all time high on porn addiction. It tears many marriages and relationships apart. I see porn usage (specifically paying for porn, OF) as cheating, and would absolutely be leaving my partner if he watched it/purchased it. I don't really buy this explanation. Porn is an inferior good to sex and relationships. It's not surprising to see it doing well in an environment where men have trouble gaining access to such things.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 01:59 AM
1

Doesn't matter, no one today is responsible for it.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:32 AM
1

Why should anyone today be punished for things that happened a millennia ago?
/r/MensRights10/10/24 05:15 AM
20

Strood Academy headteacher Jon Richardson said their haircut policy aims to bring “equality and focus.” This is why you want liberty and justice, not equality.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 05:01 AM
0

Same thing
/r/MensRights10/10/24 04:41 AM
6

There's an election coming up, everyone is more vocal in pushing for their side.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:30 AM
28

It's more that the right is a better starting point due to it being less hostile to men's issues.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:25 AM
4

Why would you need a new border bill when the executive branch already has the authority to secure the border?
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:23 AM
1

If I'm remembering the correct stats, about half of them do. Those are also the most likely cases to cause injury.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:19 AM
1

This is a rare case where feminism isn't using a distorted version of the word. Equality has to do with value. When you say "equality in front of the law" what you're talking about is justice. And yes it should be blind to everything except actions. Equality of outcomes is indeed bullshit, but to say it has nothing to do with equality when is a bit odd when it's referring to everyone ending up in the same place. To get there you'd need to do some pretty horrible things but it never gets to that …
/r/MensRights29/09/24 11:56 AM
2

I don't understand how you came to that conclusion. Is there something you you have questions about?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 10:29 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 10:22 AM
1

I really wonder what your definition of "man" is when you think it's men claiming child support from the men they rape.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 08:14 AM
12

Feminists did invent the letter bomb after all.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 07:51 AM
-7

Feminism was never about equality. It was only about harming men and coddling women. It was all about women supremacy. It is about equality. That supremacy is the result of attempting to force that equality. Just look at any attempt to create a classless society and you'll see the same pattern.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 07:49 AM
9

I don't think I've ever seen an honest comparison of men and women's porn consumption. They all seem to focus on visual media and leave out the literary works. This skews the comparison, men tend to prefer the visual while women tend to prefer the literary. Obviously you're going to find more porn consumption from men when you leave out the medium women prefer.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 12:54 AM
1

Feminism does advocate for equality. That's the fundamental problem with it. You have to enforce equality with institutions that modify individual behavior. Without those institutions people are free to make different choices that will inevitably lead to different outcomes. The issue with the equality approach is the institutions it creates are inevitably corrupted. We see this same pattern in other ideologies that aim for equality like Marxism.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 12:42 AM
1

You might want to look into how groups like the YMCA, Boy Scouts and various fraternal orders worked. The former two were founded to do exactly what you're trying to do while the latter used to be a popular way to do mutual aid and charity. Some of these organizations might even be worth joining directly, but I would expect many to be infested with feminism, so be careful on that front. Either way they should be a good source of ideas, even if you might have to dig into their history to find the…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 10:15 AM
8

The worst part of that excuse is it's basically an argument against statutory rape laws. Or to put it another way, it's a pro pedophilia argument. Enjoyment is independent of age after all.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:54 AM
1

Setting aside that most of what you said is factually wrong, the US is a small part of history that that pioneered the idea of liberty. Their citizens had more opportunity than most other nations. Historically peasant farmers typically stayed as peasant farmers. There really weren't many options for improving their situation until industrialization came along and vastly improved farming.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:31 AM
3

This is testable if you can get enough data on widows and widowers. They didn't go through the court system.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 07:17 AM
1

What opportunities did a peasant farmer have?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 06:56 AM
1

Why are you assuming restrictions on men are caused by restrictions on women? Have you considered that historically, househusbands were not able to fill the same vital role that housewives did?
/r/MensRights18/09/24 10:19 AM
22

Lawyers are expensive. Do you think all men are financially able to fight for equal access to their children?
/r/MensRights18/09/24 10:11 AM
13

How many men could be househusbands historically? I think you won't find many. Strict sex roles cut both ways. And let's not belittle housewives just because you don't value the role. Historically they were vital to our success and you probably owe your very existence to them.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:43 AM
2

Well yeah, feminism purports to be for equality and equality is fundamentally evil. It's an unattainable goal that only serves to justify the erosion of an individual's rights. You can't have equality if people can make different choices with different outcomes after all. The elites like this type of ideology because it fights for more power for the state. Ostensibly to enforce equality on the masses, but a look at the history of communist countries shows that it just ends up giving more power t…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:28 AM
2

This is just the feminist conception of objectification applied to men. I'm not convinced when they say it and I'm not convinced here either. It relies on the faulty assumption that what someone sees in the media they consume will automatically change how they act. This link has yet to be proven despite decades of trying with violent video games. Another issue is that the things that prompt objectification complaints are indeed objects. Stories, pictures, movies, video games and sex toys are not…
/r/MensRights16/09/24 10:35 AM
6

There are millions of arguments like this. My counter is that it's not because of "men", rather it's because of complex, changing, and often subtle social and institutional dynamics. Feminists are just going to say that this is patriarchy and it hurts men too. Then proclaim the fix is more feminism, while ignoring the history of feminism covering up the abuse of men.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:14 AM
10

I'm rather sceptical of an article written by a university professor who doesn't cite their sources. Especially when she calls out sourceless stats as a problem in that very article.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 06:33 AM
0

You seem to be talking to someone else. I've been consistent with my criticism of your stance. You can't use the law to justify that something is bad then turn around and say the law isn't necessarily moral.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 05:23 AM
0

I think you responded to the wrong person. Other threads are irrelevant when taking about your logical inconsistencies.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 05:07 AM
3

The US isn't all that different from Europe in this regard. The states just tend to lift the age gap restriction at 16-18. A lot have authority clauses too.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:15 PM
1

You started this thread with the same type of logic when you condemned the relationship by claiming it was illegal.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:06 PM
1

Most of the time when the left uses the term gender they mean stereotype, and there are indeed many of those. The fact that this conflates stereotype with sex is a feature not a bug.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:56 PM
23

Isn't that what you are doing by calling it statutory rape? Statutory is a reference to the law after all. Say what you will about the morality, but don't get upset when you're corrected on a matter of law.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:54 AM
8

Reverse discrimination is typically used deflect criticism of protected groups discriminating against unprotected groups. Typically with the claim that is doesn't exist under a prejudice plus power definition of discrimination. Positive discrimination is when a group is singled out for favorable treatment. They don't actually exist as the actions they refer to are just plain discrimination. It's just that the person using the terms is typically trying to justify it.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:17 AM
3

Gearheart, the author of "The future, if there is one, is female", was one of the pioneers of women's and gender studies in collages.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:05 AM
1

The feminists didn't replace class. All the groups you describe are classes themselves. The difference is that Marx focused on economic classes rather than those based on physical attributes. Both aim for a classless society, although feminism tends to call it equality. The issue is, the equality they seek is unrealistic and requires trampling on an individual's liberty to achieve.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 04:47 AM
1

The issue is that maturity is a rather imprecise concept. IIRC the youngest recorded mother was 6. She was obviously mature enough to bear a child as she successfully did so but most people would not consider her mature enough to do so. Both uses of mature there are correct, it's just that one is really just short for sexually mature while the other is referring to being an adult vs a child. Generally you can use context to differentiate which meaning is being used.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:51 AM
8

If that were true then no fault divorce wouldn't be a thing. Living with both parents is whats best for the child.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:31 AM
1

I think that's less about not caring and more about not having a choice.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:04 AM
8

"Real men don't care about body counts" Isn't this also the type of man who tends to pump and dump women?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 02:40 AM
3

When 34% of female murder victims are killed by an intimate partner compared to 6% of male victims, it tells us that women, when murdered, are disproportionately more likely to be killed by someone they are in a relationship with. Yes, this is true, when murdered. Which is not what you are saying. when it comes to intimate partner homicides - a very specific type of violence - women are at far greater risk. This is what you are trying to justify with those stats. The problem is the risk of being…
/r/MensRights05/09/24 09:04 AM
12

I don't see a reason to differentiate between the sexes when it comes to the integrity of their bodies. Genital mutilation is genital mutilation, regardless of which sex organs a person has.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 03:51 AM
6

I really wish video posts like this would come with a summary in the comments.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 03:45 AM
3

How do you feel about the statement "black people are more violent than whites"?
/r/MensRights05/09/24 03:29 AM
4

A 2021 report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that 34% of female murder victims were killed by an intimate partner, compared to only 6% of male murder victims. This clearly shows that women are significantly more likely than men to be killed by an intimate partner We know that far more men are murdered than women. That 6% is from a much larger population than the 34%. The only way this would be a valid comparison is if the same number of men and women were murdered.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 03:02 AM
4

Regulating prices is a good way to get shortages. If the good isn't worth what it can be sold for it won't be produced. Conversely if it's priced lower than it should be it won't be on the shelves long enough for many to buy it when they need it. The rise in price is probably due to inflation, essentially the currency you are paying with is worth less than before so they charge more. This is a problem with the currency supply, which is typically the result of the government doing more than it ca…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 06:35 AM
17

Findings indicated that females who perceive social skills as more important had higher grade point averages (GPAs), higher attendance rates, and fewer disciplinary problems than their male counterparts. Conversely, females who perceive social skills as of lesser importance have lower GPAs, poorer attendance, and more disciplinary referrals than their male counterparts. Basically the study found that social skills are less important for boys than girls. Assuming this is replicable, social skill …
/r/MensRights04/09/24 06:07 AM
1

Honestly, I think abolishing stereotypes is a fool's errand. They're based on the pattern recognition that our brains are built for. To get rid of them you'd either have to change the structure of the brain or make everyone identical. Neither of which seems practical or desirable. Sex stereotypes pose a particular problem as we are a sexually dimorphic species, pregnancy and the menstrual cycle are big differences to overcome.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:02 AM
6

The suffragettes were already racist and classist but also extremely (unsurprisingly) sexist. The white feather movement is one example. They used sexist propaganda and threatened terrorism. They didn't threaten terrorism, they had a whole arson and bombing campaign. If that's not terrorism what is?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 03:33 AM
44

I think feminist bias accounts for most of it but I suspect that the presence of men in classrooms helps moderate boys behavior.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 03:17 AM
2

That's to be expected of someone who's job title is "president of Ukraine". Particularly when parts of it are occupied.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 03:55 AM
2

People are roasting you over properly used commas when "worsted" is sitting right there.... Are the schools really that bad these days?
/r/MensRights30/08/24 02:04 AM
1

The price of something is not it's value. If it was no one would ever voluntarily buy anything. For such a transaction to occur both parties must gain something they value more than what they're giving up. This is true regardless of if the trade involves money or direct bartering. You wouldn't expect someone who loves apples and hates pears to trade their apples for pears would you? Also that "free" sex often takes considerable effort to get. Just look at the no sex until marriage types. That's …
/r/MensRights30/08/24 01:51 AM
5

Wikipedia is a terrible source. They literally take reporting on something happening as better evidence than a video of that thing happening.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:57 AM
1

the point is that with almost everything you could spend money on there is at least some objective value that makes sense to other people. No, this isn't the case. Even something as essential as food or water are still subjective. You value food less when you are full or water being more valuable in a desert than a rain forest. There is no objective value because value only exists in an individual's mind.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:39 AM
0

Territory Russia wants to control. It's a lot like how Hamas want's to control the entirety of Israel. Which is why they were firing those rockets. But really the analogy isn't very good regardless. Russia and Ukraine are much closer militarily than Hamas and Israel.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:30 AM
3

Like most things the exact specifics depend on the state. Check the local laws rather than going by this account.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:47 AM
27

Some boys haven't even started at that age.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:42 AM
3

One of men's issues is the media reporting on men's issues though.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:15 AM
1

It's actually an important distinction to make. Gaza and the west bank are governed by two different groups who could both claim to be palestinian. Gaza has Hamas whereas the west bank has the Palestinian Authority. These are two distinct political entities who should not be conflated together.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:35 AM
7

Ukraine hasn't been firing rockets a Russia for it's entire independent existence.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:09 AM
2

And yes, people who use prostitutes must think they are getting something of value out of it. If they saw the truth - that there is indeed NO value and is not even worth the time - they would stop using immediately. This is just your opinion that you are projecting on the world. All value is subjective, there is no "true value" for anything. If there was no-one would trade that thing. It does also apply to television (at least junk television with no educational value), smoking, gambling, drinki…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:25 AM
5

The John is receiving zero value. This only has merit as your opinion. It's not true in any objective sense. The Johns clearly value the sex they buy as they're willing to pay money for it. Such transactions wouldn't occur if both sides had the same value for the service. In this way prostitution is the same as any other service. If you are having trouble understanding what this means look at it this way; plenty of men have squandered a fortune on sex addiction and prostitutes. Nobody has ever m…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 12:55 AM
13

Except he wasn't even charged with planning and committing murder, and the crying occurred when he was recounting the events that lead to him killing and injuring his attackers. He wasn't even punished for the crime you think he committed due to a successful self defense argument. Wherever you get your news you should drop them. They seem to have grossly misinformed you about the case.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 07:42 AM
14

The left did the same to Kyle Rittenhouse when he cried during his trial. This is a non-partisan issue.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 01:36 AM
2

You might want to look into the YMCA. It was founded to do exactly what you suggest. It's history is probably a good model to consider even if it's been captured by feminists already. Another part of history to study is fraternal orders. These were a popular form of welfare prior to the government taking up that mantle.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:57 AM
3

Like most feminist views of history, the idea that women didn't work is false. It's just that feminism doesn't value the jobs women did historically.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:46 AM
1

a lot of people are focused on the woman's attraction but really the qualitative difference is a conflict of interest. boss or professor is in a position to reward her for sleeping with him with promotions or opportunities. Untangling who is exploiting whom in that situation is just a big mess. It's much simpler just to avoid that problem by discouraging such pairings.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 03:28 AM
2

I'm not sure why there should be solutions in a post comparing feminists and tradcons in terms of men's rights. I'm also confused how you came to the conclusion that men's rights activism is pointless. My original point was that the tradcons are much more individualistic than the feminists. The issues you raised Either aren't clearly different position between the two or aren't clearly an issue for a men's rights group. Men and boys being excluded from welfare is a men's rights issue but what fo…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:17 PM
2

That's a rather simplistic view of conscription. In the US Nixon, a republican, abolished the draft only for Carter, a democrat, to reestablish it some years later. It's not really a tradcon vs feminist issue. Parental surrender is a bad thing. The organizations responsible for the surrendered children generally suck. As far as men's rights goes, this is only an issue if the mother can dump the child while the father cannot. Which is the feminist view. The tradcons are at least consistent in the…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:13 AM
2

That runs into the issue of demographics. When you start looking at who is doing the violence suddenly you're a racist bigot or something and the conversation ends before you can look further. But all is not lost, fatherlessness does seem to play a role in violence and that is a men's issue we can talk about.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 07:15 AM
3

The tradcon view is that the woman should be taken care of by her husband and in exchange he gets a wife and a mother for his children. This is fundamentally different from the feminist view where all women should be taken care of by the state. If you don't like the tradcon outlook you can make other life arrangements while co-existing with the tradcons. Feminism on the other hand is a totalitarian ideology that'll force you to pay for welfare programs for women who are doing better than the men…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 06:55 AM
8

That's the thing with stereotypes. They aren't necessarily true and you can manufacture them through propaganda. Compare feminist masculinity with things like the greedy Jew/capitalist, or the KKK's view of people who are black. All of them use stereotypes to vilify the group they don't like.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:55 AM
9

Feminists use the term "masculinity" to disguise stereotyping of men. The best response is to call out their stereotyping as well as the prejudice & discrimination it leads to. It's a pretty thin disguise when masculinity pretty much means "what is stereotypically male".
/r/MensRights19/08/24 02:34 AM
14

What do you think the internet is for?
/r/MensRights13/08/24 10:43 AM
1

Male prisons are much, much worse. Not in every metric. The inmate on inmate sexual assault rate is higher in women's prisons.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 10:31 AM
1

A potato is the apple of the earth in some places, which is close enough for me.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 09:41 AM
1

I'm going to go with the really low hanging fruit there. In fact, this fruit is so low-hanging it actually fell off the tree. More like fruit so low hanging that it's a potato.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:16 AM
1

I bet if you looked into it, boy would be more interested in drugs than girls, does that somehow make it ok to give them drugs?
/r/MensRights13/08/24 01:49 AM
1

Did you miss her Ted talk? It'd be a shame if you did. It's quite good.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 06:03 AM
3

You misunderstand the argument. If women can be paid less for the same work, they would be preferentially hired in a free market. Companies that do this would out compete those that discriminate against women. The fact that we don't really see that in the demographics suggests that either women aren't putting in the same work as men or they aren't actually cheaper to hire than men. Given what we know about the causes of the earnings gap, there is strong evidence for the former. Women tend to pri…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 06:00 AM
1

Organizations like this need new members to perpetuate themselves. One of the best ways to recruit someone is to help them when they are down. This provides incentive for these organizations to seek out such people on their own.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:42 AM
10

What party loves to send men to die in war? Both What party is against Healthcare and particularly mental health care, despite the prevalent suicide rate in men? Neither, they just disagree on state involvement. What party denies abortion, forcing not only women into birth, but men into 18 years of payments? The one that thinks both parents have obligations to their children. What party refuses gun control, despite men being by far the largest victims of gun violence? Gun control doesn't work. M…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:34 AM
4

The YMCA and Boy Scouts were founded to teach boys how to be men. That sounds an awful lot like what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 09:38 AM
3

They have an incentive to seek out such cartoon women. That's what gets them clicks and pays the bills.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:49 AM
6

To be fair they're set up to fail. That's what happens when you pick people based on something other than merit. You can see a similar pattern in racially selected collage applicants.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 10:11 AM
6

I also think women and girls have issues with knowing when “done” and “sufficient” happen. I’m uncertain when this cognitive change happened. This feeds into their perception of how well a chore is accomplished. I wonder if that correlates with the end of home economics in school.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 01:54 AM
3

Most criminals share the same sentiment about pedos as the general population. The idea that they should be dead is quite common. IIRC is a common acronym for "if I recall correctly". PREA is the prison rape elimination act, a piece of US legislation aimed at doing exactly what it says. A lot of the data on US prison rape comes from this act.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:57 AM
1

I recommend reading further. The article isn't endorsing that view.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:03 AM
1

If the measure is "has a say in government and business affairs" then then the patriarchy ended before the right to vote. Women played a strong role in the prohibition movement and that amendment passed first.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:41 AM
4

From what I understand the prisoners don't rape the pedos. Also IIRC the PREA act is working, could be a useful model for other countries.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:41 AM
2

Dude, you think ALGERIA, of all places, would allow a trans person to represent them internationally? The country that punishes homosexuality with death? Them? A trans athlete? Iran does the homosexual death thing and accepts gender transition. Not everyone views the two as linked.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:28 AM
4

These days I don't look forward to movie adaptions of things I like. Hollywood is just going to destroy it somehow.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 07:15 AM
0

Sex and gender are often conflated in biomedical research based on the incorrect assumption that they are determined by the same factors and that the two are directly related to one another Oh, look. Using gender for someone's personality traits leads to conflating the social with the biological. It's almost like what I've been saying is true. The reality is more complicated in that sex and gender are both influenced by biological and social factors And look even here they make the mistake of as…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 04:42 AM
1

No one is claiming that sex is a social construct. You seem to conflate sex with gender and that’s where you’re wrong. Do you stand by this? Also when I say gender is a social construct I mean gender norms are a social construct because it all created by society but gender it self is biological. or this? They seem rather incompatible with each other. Gender norms are just a group of stereotypes, which are indeed a social construction. But you are admitting that gender is biological. The biologic…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:50 AM
1

I don't think so. That implies a degree of homogeneity among conservatives that I don't really see. Conservative is a very broad category, just like liberal.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 08:48 AM
3

Conscription is a pretty poor choice of criticism against Trump considering the US got involved in no new wars under his presidency.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:11 AM
1

I don't think you can determine that with this data. It's highly unlikely that women on reddit are a representative sample of women as a whole and you don't know how many of those upvotes are men.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 02:12 AM
15

Who in their right mind would put Hillary on the ballot when she has already proved to be less electable than Trump?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 02:06 AM
0

Sex and gender are synonyms, and have been for a long time. That meaning predates the social constructionist view and is still in common use today. Anyone who says "there are two genders" is using the sex definition for instance. The "individual and cultural norms" meaning is better understood if you use the word stereotype. The stereotypical man differs from culture to culture, and there are many different stereotypes within a culture. Fits your examples perfectly. No reason to try to erase an …
/r/MensRights22/07/24 02:04 AM
0

The reason most men act differently is because gender isn't a social construct. If it was you could easily define what actions make you a man or not and evaluate if your examples meet that criteria. What we actually see is that your completely different men do have similarities, biological ones.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 05:52 AM
2

That's a dark rabbit hole to go down. Generally it's done in the name of sexual liberation, like the guy who fostered children with pedophiles.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:46 PM
1

That is such a narrow view of socialism that I think you'd find it difficult to find any socialists at all. Socialists typically oppose capitalism because their economic system fails in the face of capitalist efficiency, and the underlying liberalism prevents them from forcing people into socialist systems. A good example of this is the communists eradicating the Kulaks. They were low class peasant farmers, but because the were a bit more successful, they were branded as capitalists. Socialists …
/r/MensRights16/06/24 04:45 AM
4

Child support is rather shitty for the child. Money can't replace their father.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:15 AM
0

The Soviets terrorized and stole the assets of the Kulaks when they collectivized the farms. Just like farms are an important part of food production labor is an important component to production. It's a common theme when socialists take over a market. The DAF had control of the means of production. They rounded up the homeless to put them to work, and put the volkswagon into production. Sure the employers were part of the organization but The DAF is the economic arm of a totalitarian regime wit…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:58 AM
1

Hitler viewed nationality as tied to race, but that certainly isn't universal. Nations are typically defined by borders not race. But even in the case of Hitler's usage, all that the nationalist part is concerned with is drawing a boarder. Socialism on the other hand is concerned with economics. Economic policy constrained within a border is a valid combination.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:44 AM
70

Linguistically woman is a noun while female is both a noun and adjective. That's why "woman friend" or "woman performer" sound wrong, but "female friend" and "female performer" don't.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:06 AM
-1

but in practice they never implemented any form of socialism or communism How do you explain the the national labor organization? Public ownership of the means of production is a pretty basic definition of socialism. Surely organizing labor into the public sector qualifies. It's one of the primary components of production. this is not how socialism works, socialism seeks to weaken class distinctions and in some cases even abolish it altogether. What socialism seeks to do, and what it actually re…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:28 AM
3

Right, I totally believe they guy that takes the time to respond "just cant be assed" rather than simply having no idea.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:46 AM
1

So you don't know. Got it.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:38 AM
6

I don't see feminism in the west as liberal. They seem more totalitarian given how they treat dissent.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:36 AM
1

What part of nationalism is incompatible with socialism? Do you think socialism requires world domination or something?
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:20 AM
3

I don't think the fact that these articles you cite fail to compare with men is a nitpick. A good example is right at the start of the article where they mention that Russia gave women the right to vote in 1917, but that year also marks the end of the Russian monarchy. It's not all that different from the men. Kinda an important fact when trying to use voting rights as evidence of oppression since the beginning of civilization.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 05:05 AM
3

That's pretty useless because it doesn't really compare to what the men could do. Universal suffrage is a pretty recent concept after all. Although I do notice that your list says women were banned from voting in the UK in 1832. Kinda undermines your point. Wikipedia is also a trash tier source.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 04:35 AM
3

I don't think the feminist version of patriarchy has ever been real. The voting argument doesn't convince me because it's overly simplified and only applicable to the US. It also ignores that women played a big roll in getting the 18th amendment passed. Women were not as devoid of political power prior to the 19th amendment as we are lead to believe.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 04:20 AM
2

It's not really comparable. No group has been slaves for as long a the patriarchy has supposedly oppressed women. The patriarchy has outlived most countries that have ever existed. That makes it unique in all the oppressive forces that we know about.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 03:23 AM
5

A revolt in the past 100 years doesn't explain why the preceding 10,000 lacked them.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:41 AM
1

Read the article I linked, there really wasn't a reason for anyone to off him. Things were already not going well for him.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:00 AM
37

You mean Earl Silverman?
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:54 AM
4

Medicine has a shit tonne of women working in it. Including it in stem would balance out the overabundance of men in the other stem fields, undermining the "more women in stem" cause some feminists like to push.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 04:33 AM
3

Honestly accounting is just math and medicine is a combination of science and engineering. I suspect the reason they aren't included has to do with the number of women in those fields.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 02:13 AM
1

I think trust is independent of dominance. There are submissive people who you can trust to do their part and there are others who shouldn't be trusted to raise a goldfish. It's not like you have to be dominant to be trustworthy.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 02:08 AM
1

going to a poor inner city public school vs a wealthy private school I don't really like this characterization of the education problem. It implies that if we just shovel more money into public schools it would fix the problem, but this isn't really the case. Public institutions can be very effective at pissing away money for little to no gain. There's also the issue of communities that don't value education. You can't fund away the problem of studying carrying the stigma of "acting white" for i…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 07:16 AM
2

Some perspective: A typical 40 year old couple has about a 5% chance of pregnancy per menstrual cycle followed by about a 40% chance of miscarriage. I don't think he really had a chance of accomplishing that, glad he got out of there.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:32 AM
4

I believe feminists actually think that men are inferior and are either too scared to admit it. It's actually quite the opposite. Patriarchy theory implies that women are inferior. How else could men oppress them for all of human civilization? You also see this idea in the lifestyles they promote and disdain. They praise the more masculine career oriented woman while they view the more feminine family oriented woman as an exploited slave. They crow about men being trash and the like because it m…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:19 AM
12

Reverse discrimination is just discrimination. And they don't want to push people the the extremes. Ultimately what they want is to eliminate opposing ideas and usher in the utopia they somehow know theirs will create despite all the evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:48 AM
3

metoo was just a modern version of the Salem witch trials. The court of public opinion is not just.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:13 AM
13

Feminism doesn't see individuals, only groups. This is reflected in other areas too, like how the patriarchy supposedly oppresses women regardless of class or how they invariably try to excuse a woman's wrongdoings to prevent it reflecting badly on women. Their "justice" spreads guilt to the innocent. It's a fundamentally evil worldview, which has been used to justify genocide on multiple occasions.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 04:48 AM
3

Spent too much money going to private school presumably.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 04:38 AM
-1

Ah yes, such leftist Views like private property and patriotism the nazis held. You know, the core tenéts of socialism and all unlike The United States. Nazi Germany was very different from the US. They had one big state run labor organization that pretty much every worker was a part of. That's a very effective tool for controlling the means of production. Socialism Is also not aryan, it appeared during the french revolución. Hitler's socialism was. It's how he united the various socialist facti…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 11:55 PM
2

I doubt it, single fathers have shit they have to deal with unique to them and single mothers have welfare programs targeted at them. Sexually assaulted men have it way worse than women though. You can even see this affecting laws as many places don't acknowledge the rape of men as rape.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:27 AM
3

Sure you can do things to avoid the outcomes but you shouldn't be treated more harshly just because you made a poor choice while having the wrong chromosome.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:34 AM
5

The disparity itself doesn't prove discrimination but if you look into how things actually work, you'll generally find discrimination in MRA causes. Incarceration for instance part of the disparity is lenient sentencing for women. It's not a man's choice that the justice system treats him differently. Family court is similarly biased, how do you expect fathers to fight for their children when the courts are expensive and start with the assumption that he owes the mother money? Sure you can do th…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:37 AM
5

When they bring up equity they are typically complaining about a difference in outcomes, under the assumption that it's evidence of discrimination. This isn't actually true though. Individuals have different priorities and abilities which inevitably leads to different outcomes. The only way to get the same outcome from individuals is to force them to conform. The various affirmative action efforts are an attempt to do this. That the tactic makes things shit for everyone never seems to occur to t…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 01:39 AM
11

MRAs and Feminists don't share views on equality. MRAs tend to favor equality under the law whereas Feminism generally uses it as a front for special treatment.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 01:05 AM
3

Feminism promises to make life better for women but fails to provide happiness.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 12:56 AM
-1

Are you really trying to argue that the deal men get under conservative views is as bad as under feminist ones? At least the conservatives have a role for men that isn't the villain.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:43 AM
2

Careful there, wouldn't want to give any painters bad ideas.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:05 AM
8

They never stop to think "why is it like this". There's probably a reasonable medical explanation like "babies tend to die when given painkillers" or something.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:22 AM
1

Those people really loath femininity don't they. Also don't seem to understand that you can encourage actions without forcing them.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:14 AM
2

What do you expect from a totalitarian movement that thinks femininity is inferior?
/r/MensRights17/05/24 12:41 AM
3

Overgrown children is a pretty good description of Marxists though.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 12:27 AM
7

It's not just because they should be able to. They want to break up male spaces because That's where they think the patriarchy is formed. If men are allowed to bond an socialize in their own spaces they'll collude to keep women under their boot. It's a load of nonsense but that's what you get out of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:18 AM
8

Some interesting stuff in there. These are the questions they used to define "male supremacy" for instance. Anti-Feminism Feminism is about hating men Modern society prioritizes women over men Feminists are unattractive Women use feminism to gain an unfair advantage over men Feminists are seeking to control men Female Dishonesty in Relationships If a man commits to a woman in a romantic relationship, she gets the upper hand. In a relationship, women are less trustworthy than men Men in romantic …
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:03 AM
3

To be even more generous you could run the numbers using something like the NISVS. Using the 12 month prevalence of rape and the 2010 male population I got 0.97% of men raping if you assume rapists only rape one woman. Still a very low number.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:02 AM
2

What if men and women tend to show different symptoms?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:25 AM
1

Isn't that just the sims as a live service game?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:19 AM
1

Hunter gatherers were also largely replaced by pastoralists and farmers, so I think the point still stands. But yes, you are correct that it's not straightforward, there are a lot of factors that go into human evolution.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:45 PM
1

Hamas is a terrorist organization because they've claimed responsibility for terrorist attacks. Similarly we know they want to wipe Israel off the map due to what they say. The "from the river to the sea" slogan is effectively a territorial claim, and if you know the geography of the region, doesn't leave room for Israel. It doesn't take some Israeli propaganda operation to come to the conclusion That they are terrorist who want Israel gone when their own words and actions support it. It's inter…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:39 PM
1

I think the male disposability theory is way too simplistic to be useful. While your example is correct from a child bearing perspective it fails to take into account resources. Any human society that squanders is most capable resource gatherers is also going to be outnumbered and overtaken. More babies aren't very useful if they all starve to death.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 07:40 AM
2

The "victim" in this case is ruled by a terrorist organization that wants to eradicate Israel. Why do you assume that knowing the history would make someone side with them?
/r/MensRights09/05/24 07:06 AM
1

They are also all military veterans.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:49 AM
4

South Korea requires a number of years of military service for it's men. This service used to get them some perks after it was over. Guess who got rid of those perks.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:47 AM
12

Most gay romance is written for women. Enough of them eat that shit up that it drowns out the stories targeting men. What really needs to happen is for the literary world to split the two into separate genres. Japan has a split where the female targeted gay manga are in the yaoi category and stories aimed at men get the bara label.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:43 AM
2

TIL: feminists are just a bucket of crabs
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:20 AM
1

That's not going to look good for the institution in the PREA data.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:45 AM
7

Masculinity is not predicated on femininity being inferior. That's just what feminists think. It's really based on how men act differently from women. Fashion is an excellent example, as we've seen styles like high heels change from being masculine to being feminine over time. It was a change in usage patterns that caused that switch not the heels becoming "inferior" somehow.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:41 AM
4

Men have more to gain by striving for those high executive positions than women do. Mostly due to differences in mate selection between them. A man being in one of those high positions is much more attractive to a woman than a woman in such is to a man. That means men are going to put more effort into getting there than women are.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:13 AM
2

While you are saving links, Pornhub's usage stats corroborate the findings.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:44 AM
2

Funny how your restatement of the argument changes it to include that made up non-consentual caveat. Moving the goalposts is a clear sign you've lost the argument. It doesn't help you when the OP that started this conversation already linked an article that covers your consent claims. Shall we see what it says? Female fans of pornography are watching more violence against women on film than men, a recent study revealed. Nevertheless, both women and men preferred aggressive sexual content when pe…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:39 AM
5

I don't understand how you can quote a paragraph that says that women had a higher interest in rough sex porn than men did and conclude that women are less likely to watch violent porn than men. I linked that data specifically because it supports my point. Do you think I'm stupid or something? "So what does it say that rough sex \* is at the bottom of the list below reality porn?"* It means is that the difference in interest between men and women in reality porn is greater than the difference in…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 08:41 AM
2

You're missing an important bit of context for that quote, that's in reference to those that like aggressive porn. So they aren't getting off to evidence of actual rape or whatever but to actors performing a role. It's a lot like how a slasher movie would be pretty horrifying as a documentary but as a fictional work it's entertaining. That miscommunication is on me, I probably should have included more of the quote. Sorry about that. Also, I've seen other surveys that found rape fantasies and BD…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:47 AM
15

It doesn't. Pornhub's own stats corroborate it. Rough sex and bondage were both viewed more by women than men.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:30 AM
10

a vast majority of pornography viewers — 95% of women and 97% of men — are only aroused when they know they’re watching willing participants The women in the study emphasized consentual aggression less than the men did.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:26 AM
2

What's the UK equivalent of OSHA? While it seems that your chances of getting them on the sexism won't pan out. You might be able to do something on the workplace safety front. Almost being crushed seems like an indecent that would be of interest to a workplace safety organization.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:11 AM
-1

I think the only realistic alternatives are internment or deportation. Both of which have problems of their own. Something people should keep in mind is the people from the Gaza strip are not the same as the people from western nations. It's a religious conflict for them which has root's going all the way back to when the ottoman empire controlled the region. I don't really blame Israel for not wanting religious fanatics who want them gone within their borders. They'd probably block the women to…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:40 AM
3

It's an active war zone, everything you hear about it is propaganda of one form or another.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:08 AM
0

Feminists discover why they aren't being eaten by bears. And decide they hate it.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:54 AM
1

Getting all the workers in one organization just creates a monopoly. It's not a effective way to prevent exploitation.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 03:18 AM
5

It's not. Feminism wholly supports affirmative action even after parity has been reached. You don't advance yourself by demanding people give you things. That actually stalls advancement and prevents accomplishments.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:35 AM
2

That rape of a child charge is no joke. If that sticks she's looking at a minimum of 25 years.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:21 AM
2

That's not actually a problem. It's an article written for laypeople to understand the findings of this meta analysis. The data supporting these statements has passed peer review.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 01:16 AM
29

I think you've misunderstood who this type of propaganda is for. "all of you must respect me" goes over poorly but "all of them must respect us" goes over well with the in group. Similarly "punish all of us for the few" upsets people but if it's "punish all of them"? perfectly fine, great even they were all monsters anyway. It's propaganda for the in group.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 01:00 AM
7

That's one of the issues with measuring any type of harassment; it's incredibly subjective. Grave insults and even death threats can be friendly banter in the right context. The worst part is that because it's so subjective, you can teach people to find innocuous behavior to be harassing. It's an easy way to manufacture more harassment.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:57 PM
1

Isn't the UK already criminalizing carrying certain tools if you don't have a need for them?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 12:29 AM
1

Chinese civilization isn't that old. It's younger than the US. They threw out their past when the communists took over. Also, they are starting to run into demographic problems due to their prioritization of male children during the one child policy. They aren't a strong counter argument.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 12:16 AM
2

You say that sarcastically, but that's pretty much it. The real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport. That tightly woven power structure actually defines patriarchal society An explanation by Sally Miller Gearheart.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 11:56 PM
13

That's kinda funny to say when the idea originates from a gender studies professor. One of the first in fact.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 11:37 PM
13

At least cite the source, it's from The future, if there is one, is female by Sally Miller Gearheart.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 11:34 PM
1

Generally it's done by making a society that young men want to engage with. Forcing it runs the risk of those young men tearing it all down to make something new. The west is somewhat resistant to this due to their governments being designed for incremental change but I don't think that'll help if the young men don't believe in this type of system.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:24 AM
1

it’s the language that we’ve developed around them that codes them as masculine or feminine traits. This isn't remotely true. Masculinity and femininity are defined by the traits and actions of men and women. Take high heels for instance. Today they are considered feminine footwear but they originated as a masculine style. It's not the language that makes high heels masculine or feminine, it's the actions of the people. When men stop wearing high heels and women take it up, the way we perceive i…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:16 AM
1

biological essentialism (she promotes that females are inherently and biologically superior to males, of which she receives no criticism for) Biological essentialism is just the opposite of social constructivism. It's the nature half of the nature vs nurture argument. What you describe is female supremacy.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:42 AM
1

Women being inferior is a logical conclusion if patriarchy theory is true. You gotta explain something like 12 millennia of oppression somehow.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:26 AM
2

I have yet to see any feminists blame a natural disaster on "The Patriarchy" Does global warming count? I feel like you'd be able to find feminists that blame that on their patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:18 AM
2

If you wanted to you could build a lifestyle where you never left your home, but that's at the extreme end. Really it's all about risk mitigation. Working an office job in a low crime area, driving safely and avoiding all of the more risky hobbies will likely serve you just as well learning to deal with blood, guts and broken bones. The types of accidents you are worried about are not an every day occurrence for the individual.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:27 AM
1

I think part of it stems from the subjective nature of pain. They can't measure your pain and give you the exact dosage of meds you need, which makes deciding if the painkiller's potential complications are worth it difficult.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:14 PM
2

I see where you are coming from but I don't feel like it's a necessity. Modern society is pretty good at isolating people from such things. It's feasible for people to simply choose an appropriate career path if they can't handle it.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:48 PM
3

There's already work being done in that direction. The prea part of the prearecoucecenter link is referring to the Prison Rape Elimination Act, legislation aimed at doing exactly that. One of the things is does is mandate data collection on the prevalence of the issue and releasing it to the public. You can find data all the way down to specific facilities.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:29 PM
16

feminists male or female aren't people, they're parrots NPC is a more appropriate term. Parrots are capable of learning.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:10 PM
4

Wikipedia is in no way a chad. They rate approved secondary sources above primary ones. In practice this means that someone important could post a blog and wiki would rate a news article twisting their words out of context as more reliable the actual post.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:07 PM
4

It's a racial category in the US. It basically refers to white people of generally European ancestry as opposed to those of mixed Spanish and native ancestry. It's a result of the different styles of colonization.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:00 PM
10

Feminists tend to be big on expensive social safety nets. Paid for by taxes that come disproportionately from men. Wile they play lip service to independence there really isn't a culture of working towards that in feminism. Probably because the women that do work for independence don't need feminism.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 02:51 AM
3

if we're talking inner city crime, Poverty, lack of education, lack of jobs, lack of food, lack of investment into those neighborhoods. Being poor drives people to crime, like a moth to a flame. The thing is, crime can cause a shortage of jobs and investment. If shoplifting gets too bad buisneses have to pull out or raise prices. Either option makes the community poorer. Also if given the option, prosperous people will often leave a violent community. Houw do you improve the place if the people …
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:31 PM
1

One of the demands in the fascist manifesto was women's right to vote.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:58 AM
3

In late industrial capitalism, the Sociologist David Graeber (RIP) noticed that much of the expansion in employment was in things like marketing, PR, HR, secretarial staff, etc. which didn't increase output but just follow regulations This has more to do with government corruption than capitalism. Socialist economies are much more prone to this type of thing for instance.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:55 AM
7

That's probably it's purpose. It's owned by china and they are not friends with the west. Any division it sows is a boon to them.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:44 AM
1

I think there is a decent argument for universities being predatory. They are sold as a path to prosperity, but are expensive and have lots of degrees that don't really pay for themselves. Those trap options are also at the forefront in degrading the prestige of the institutions, lowering the value for everyone. It's not a good system even if the sexism is in your favor.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:27 AM
1

This kind of thinking is an inevitable result of affirmative action policies. If you hire based on meaningless attributes like sex, you'll end up with worse employees due to limiting your applicant pool. This effect is especially bad when your favored group is only a small part of the applicant pool. If you want women in STEM to be valued you can't treat them differently from the men.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:02 AM
36

The believe in patriarchy theory. When they look back through the millennia, all they see is women dominated by men. I imagine that anyone would feel inferior if confronted with the idea that their group couldn't rise to power in that time frame.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:28 AM
12

How can you "sexually groom" and adult? Doesn't that only apply to children?
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:54 AM
1

Where would he go?
/r/MensRights24/03/24 10:39 PM
2

It might. Hot sauce tends to be acidic which would kill the sperm. Probably not as good as something more acidic like lemon juice or a dedicated spermicide though.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:27 AM
1

It's possible this is due to the difference in how the insult is perceived by each sex. The purpose of an insult is to rile up the target so it makes sense to use something the target thinks is demeaning. Take racial slurs for example, people don't generally use them against anyone other than the targeted race because they aren't all that effective against other races.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:35 AM
1

It's not that surprising, they retain the left's propensity to ban people with the "wrong" opinions.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:22 AM
4

They're implying that being gay is a choice and that people can change their sexuality or that being gay is a behavior instead of a sexuality. I'm pretty sure some of them actually believe this. Gender is essentially a stereotype to them which you can choose to perform. Then you have the social constructionists who think that sex differences are due to society. Which would imply that you could raise someone to be gay or whatever.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:16 AM
19

A quick search suggests that sperm prefer a more alkaline environment so the acidity of the hot sauce should kill them. Not certain how much time or hot sauce is needed though.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:07 AM
-1

IIRC there aren't really such shelters as women don't make the trip alone. There have been complaints about shelters taking up infrastructure like parks and schools though. The problem is getting worse over time though so expect to see more of this type of thing in the future.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:53 PM
-7

For context She's a city council representative for New York. Currently they are having a bit of an immigration crisis. The shelter they are protesting is likely for migrants rather than citizens in need.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 05:53 AM
-5

If it's an important detail to you, link an article that mentions it. We shouldn't have to search for that.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 05:32 AM
2

Thing is, on a cultural level we put very little effort into understanding this stuff. The main issue is it's an ethically difficult subject to study. Reasonably, no one wants you to stay quiet if you know someone has raped a child. On the other hand a pedo is likely to lie about it to avoid that massive stigma, regardless of if they committed the crime or just have the desire. Gaining the pedo's honesty puts children in danger. It just doesn't work out.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:40 AM
7

IIRC the essay lays out a plan of social enforcement by women banding together and destroying the bond between men. Not sure how that would actually work without collapsing society and destroying the plan, but feminists have always been divorced from reality.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:33 AM
8

They lack a distinction between the public and private. It's not enough for them to practice their sexuality in private. It must be publicly celebrated.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:28 AM
4

Have you read the feminist essay "The future, if there is one, is female" by Sally Miller Gearheart?
/r/MensRights16/03/24 06:54 AM
16

There's a difference between the LGBT community and gay people.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 06:42 AM
8

That certainly is the case. Both are necessary for people to thrive so it doesn't make much sense to put one above the other. It's a lot like arguing food is better than water.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:33 AM
6

It's probably one of the reports from the PREA data. This might be it. Check the full report in the highlights section under "Circumstances surrounding victimization".
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:16 AM
5

There is something wrong with being an incel in much the same way there is something wrong with being an alcoholic. It's an indication that they need help and understanding not scorn and demonization.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:53 AM
5

I dumb thing is, in their quest to be anti all the bad things, they perpetuate the very things they are trying to abolish.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:50 AM
27

Fundamentally they think femininity is weak. Just look at patriarchy theory, how could men subjugate women for millennia if women weren't inferior? Especially when they are given the task of raising children. Or you could look at their reaction to predominantly male occupations. Their solution to get more women in them is to hold them to lower standards. That wouldn't be necessary if you think they are just as capable.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:44 AM
2

Note that methodology is important, this study covered people in therapy. It's entirely possible that those who were assaulted as boys are more likely to seek therapy than male victims in general. This limits the generalization of their data. The researchers go more into this in the discussion section of their paper.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:28 AM
1

Simple math can easily get the wrong answer if you set up the problem incorrectly. Which is what you are doing here.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:57 AM
1

Yea, your not qualified to do statistics. You can't just ignore things because they don't meet some arbitrary threshold.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:53 AM
1

That simple math doesn't work. It assumes an identical labor force participation to the general population.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:06 AM
1

How do you know people are the same gender as when they applied? It's fluid isn't it? Also the old data is going to be useless because back then they only acknowledged two genders.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 12:47 AM
3

The victim-hood mindset is mostly a way to shift the blame for their own inadequacies to some external factor, usually the patriarchy or white people. It's a comfortable why of thinking where every bad thing that happens to you isn't your fault. These people make up most of the people who are quick to self-identify as victims. Probably because they lack the shame that come with allowing yourself to be victimized.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:20 AM
12

Texas age of consent is 17. The guy is in a shit situation but legally speaking the woman did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:08 AM
4

Who is more to blame for a murder, the hitman or the the guy who hired him?
/r/MensRights12/03/24 01:15 AM
5

I see similar rhetoric in the US with respect to Mexican immigrants, which I’m pretty sure is actually just bogus. Most of the illegal drugs in the US go over that border. A lot of the Mexicans that cross are going to be related to the cartels. Particularly nowadays with the lax border enforcement and sanctuary cities.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 02:25 AM
5

It's like someone looking at food and water and deciding that food is worthless.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 02:01 AM
3

I looked it up and in a cruel twist of fate her name is Karen Horney. What an absolute meme of a name.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 01:58 AM
2

Really is just shows their disdain for the feminine. The don't acknowledge women's power because it's different from men's.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:37 PM
5

Power + prejudice is just a way to deflect from their own sexism. Since they are on the "right side" of history they can't possibly be intolerant bigots or something.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 10:41 PM
7

I suspect if you featured black people coming from apes, a certain demographic would cry racism.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 10:17 PM
5

You could have one that can accurately diagnose cancer from a picture or you could have robot Hitler. It's all about what it was trained to do.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 06:48 AM
2

I'm disapointed in you calling boys retarded just because of the way humans evolved over millions of years. That is the assumption of the delayed entry policy policy. If you don't think boys are retarded don't treat them like they are.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 06:30 AM
1

I'm sorry but "the boys are retarded" is not an argument against removing bias from grading and improving our ability to teach. Boys being typically more energetic than girls would even be covered grouping students by how they learn. You can take such students and give them a curriculum that has them move around more.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 11:53 PM
21

I don't think we should be adjusting grades, but it should be pretty easy to set up a blind grading system to eliminate the bias. Adjusting classes should be done but I think rather than focusing on sex segregation a system where students are grouped by how they learn best should be tried.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 06:42 AM
1

It's rather questionable to assert that actual pedophilia can occur in fiction. One of the defining features of fiction is that it's imaginary. Do you think games like grand theft auto contain actual larceny and murder as well?
/r/MensRights06/03/24 04:52 AM
4

That's a rather unhinged response to a correction of the facts. Do you think there are no 18 year olds in high school or something?
/r/MensRights06/03/24 03:02 AM
1

Rias is 18 at the start of the series. That would put her at or above the age of majority in most countries.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 02:37 AM
5

The phase isn't really in common use so it's kind of up to the individual. But a native English speaker is likely to take it in a sexual way. Nuts is a synonym to crazy and to be crazy for a woman would imply sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 02:03 AM
3

A totalitarian state is a requirement for an equality of outcome. If individuals are allowed to make their own choices they'll inevitably affect whatever metrics you use to determine what is "equal". That's entirely in line with the goals of feminism. The elite get behind it because it means more power for them. Their interests align so they work together.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 01:45 AM
3

The point of the law is to treat the unborn baby as a person. Most deaths will have some form of investigation, particularly when the deceased is young. The investigation is likely going to look similar to instances where babies die. That is often a tragedy as well due to things like sudden infant death syndrome. That particular ban implementation may be a bad one, but we won't really know until it's been through the courts a few times. If it does turn out that way, the legislature can always am…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 01:37 AM
6

Isn't that what downvotes are for? shit you don't like?
/r/MensRights05/03/24 10:11 PM
11

The victimization narrative breaks their ability to self improve. If everything is someone else's fault the only way to make things better is to force others to change their behavior. Do that enough and you end up with a totalitarian hellhole.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 10:02 PM
8

Opinions on abortion aren't split between the sexes though. Religious and political views correlate much more closely. The legislature making the bans is voted in by both men and women. This isn't something you can just blame men for. Also keep in mind that the arguments against abortion fame it as a crime against a person rather than an equality issue. That's not a men vs women issue.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 09:58 PM
1

They exist under the US governmental and economic system. Which is rather meaningless, you can find similar apps in socialist countries like China. The difference is how much control the government has over them. More control is more socialist. Which is the direction the US has been heading. Notably this happens to correlate with "women fucking around" trend. If capitalism caused this behavior you'd expect to see the opposite. My US history may be faulty but I'm pretty sure in the past they didn…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 12:19 AM
14

Anything where the victim mentality takes hold encourages this behavior. If working on yourself produces results it undermines the idea that society is against you.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:54 PM
6

I don't think "be an inverse feminist" is a good way to go. I don't like how their policies turn out. They aren't going to be improved by shifting the target.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:44 PM
5

I don't think the idea that capitalism is the cause stands up to scrutiny. These problems are fairly recent in the US and that country has become less capitalistic over time. The two don't correlate. Free markets only optimize production they don't dictate what people demand so I don't see how capitalism could cause this. Further if you look at the people pushing for the sexual liberation that encourages women to sleep around they tend to be some brand of socialist. If the people pushing that in…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:33 PM
9

Terrible people can be correct sometimes. Women's choice on who they have children with does affect future generations. Sexual selection is well documented in other animals after all. It's just that genetics is probably not the whole story when it comes to humans.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 09:22 PM
3

I suspect that totalitarianism is an independent variable to marriage in terms of producing great artists and scientists. But you are correct that creating unrest through destroying marriage is an effective way to justify more power for the government.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 08:57 PM
7

I'm pretty sure the states with the population growth are not kind to single old people either.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 08:49 PM
3

The Women’s Association does some cool stuff I’d really like. They’ve had professional photographers in to take headshots for work and social media profiles. Speakers on work/life balance. Career guidance. Stuff like that. Depending on the local laws it might actually be illegal to kick you out of these things.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:49 PM
14

You see 100% of the effort you put in but can't see 100% of the effort your partner puts in.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:42 PM
4

XD I only studied psychology and sociology academically for years, but you're right, wtf do I know. Look up the grievance studies affair. Your credentials are not as prestigious as you think.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:40 PM
12

That's all well and good until civilization crumbles due to a lack of people to support it. Nature is not kind to the old.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:34 PM
33

I often wonder how many stories, how many scientific breakthroughs, how many plays, musical scores and innovations, have been tossed onto the pyre of human marriage. This number she's wondering about is probably zero. Without marriage you incentivize the pump and dump mating strategy for men. We know how poorly single mothers are at raising children. You aren't going to get as many great artists and scientists with that strategy. There's a reason every civilization worth mentioning practices mar…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:29 PM
13

Found it. For future reference, you can try searching long strings of text to find a source. I found this one by doing a search with the entire first bullet point.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:54 AM
5

When does the left ever look to address the root causes?
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:46 AM
3

The part you missed is if it's gay to women it tends to kill the guy's dating prospects with them.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:38 AM
4

It's not exactly communism, but they share the same roots. That's why they also have similarities to the Nazis and Fascists. All them are more similar than their proponent's would like you to believe.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:34 AM
4

I think school choice would be an easier fight to win and have a lot of the same effects.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:20 AM
2

This is a feminist motte and bailey at work. The feminist definition of patriarchy is not the traditional one you are speaking of here. The traditional patriarchy has the purpose of giving the man the tools he needs to provide for his family and assure him the the children his wife gives birth to are his. A good example of this in action is the custody policy prior to the tender years doctrine. Their father is obligated to take care of them so he got custody to be able to fulfill his duties. The…
/r/MensRights28/02/24 12:37 AM
1

That might actually be known. You'd have to check their methodology to see if they were included in the sample or not, and if they were, what percentage they made up.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:52 PM
2

You should be able to train an AI to spot pretty much any trait you want. All you need is a large database of brain scans which is tagged appropriately. Just split the data in half and use one set to train the AI and the other to test. Anything with an actual difference will allow the AI to improve with each training iteration.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:40 PM
1

Go to the article you linked and look to the upper right for a heading labeled report materials. Under that you'll find a link to a pdf labeled topline questionnaire. The harassment questions are on the last two pages.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:06 AM
0

Are those not examples of why you have a low opinion of genetic research? It certainly reads that way to me. You claim the post is about specific genetic research, but never mention what that is. Your edit clearly references the OP's article but that's not genetic research. It's a technique for culturing cells. What is this specific example of genetic research you are talking about?
/r/MensRights24/02/24 07:24 AM
0

You provided two examples with your general statements, too ethical to test on people and not ethical enough to let the creations live. Both of these are applicable to a broad range of genetic research. Without your edit, it's not clear at all.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 05:31 AM
1

It's already at the point of testing on mice, but I think the issue the other guy may have had is that not all genetic research has the ethical problems you brought up. A lot of the genetically modified plants just have genes from other plants for instance.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:20 AM
3

This argument doesn't really apply to this case. What we have is a program that can sort male and female brains with a high degree of accuracy. It's not saying "the average woman's brain looks like this", it's saying "this particular brain is female". A better analogy would be forensics finding a victims traits from their bones. I do agree with your view on the individual vs the average, but disagree that no one does this. Conflating the individual with the group is the fallacious logic that thi…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 03:44 AM
3

Try this.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 06:33 AM
18

I don't see why anyone should take advice on how to date women from a gay man. That seems too far outside their experience to for them to gain expertise. Which is probably why this guy has such a bad take. If all your partner brings to the table is their presence, you are effectively in a relationship with a statue. And it's much cheaper and less drama prone to just buy a statue.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:00 AM
3

I'd kinda like to see how that plays out with widow and widower parents. That group should be free of any bias introduced by the courts.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:48 AM
2

Investigating the mechanisms underlying feminists’ actual and perceived attitudes, Studies 4 (n = 2,092) and 5 (nationally representative UK sample, n = 1,953) showed that feminists (vs. nonfeminists) perceived men as more threatening, but also more similar, to women. So the only studies to contain representative samples showed feminists are more likely to have a negative attitude toward men. It's almost like surveying collage students and women on social media isn't a great way to compare femin…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:26 AM
85

Rather than super human capabilities it's more like the AI developed a human capability to a super level. Fundamentally all it's doing is recognizing patterns. Your own brain can do something similar with regards to recognizing faces. It just that you have that ability as a result of millions of years of natural evolution whereas the AI has it from millions of iterations of it's algorithm being tested and randomly changed.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:08 PM
1

Oddly enough, boring old fashioned heterosexuals are the intended target audience for most of these.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 12:52 PM
248

They trained an AI to tell the difference between male and female brains using MRI scans of working brains. It's similar to a study where chest xrays were used to train an AI to detect race. That study got the researchers accused of racism.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:45 AM
1

Just in case you need to purge more toxins, there is a genre of visual novel which has a story written to make you cry: nakige. These games are often erotic and typically aimed at men. A good (non-erotic) example would be Clannad or pretty much anything else made by Key. Some of these also have manga or anime adaptations if you would prefer that to the visual novel format.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 08:29 AM
3

Not really. If you use your own fat, your average density doesn't change. You can't gain additional buoyancy that way. You'd have to either transplant fat from someone else or culture more of your own fat to make the implants. That would give you a higher ratio of low density fat to high density muscle and bone. Thus lowering your average density and increase the buoyancy.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:54 AM
3

That doesn't actually work. Saline implants are essentially neutrally buoyant and silicone ones are only a little denser. Human fat would be a better flotation device.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:13 AM
4

We already live in such a world. It's our generalist abilities that let us live anywhere on the earth.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 04:09 AM
1

Soft power is no joke. It let Iceland beat the UK in the cod wars.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:52 AM
16

I would just assume they are bad at math. That's typically the case with feminist stats.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:40 AM
4

Fun fact: Hysteria was once a medical condition in women where the cure was to use a vibrator. The early days of modern medicine were wild.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:37 AM
1

If this planet continues to heat up, we’ll also be on the chopping block for extinction. Humans are the most successful generalist. Generalists tend to be the most resilient in extinction events. It'd take something way more catastrophic than climate change to end us.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:26 AM
6

Doesn't have to be exclusive. If you are trying to manipulate the population you just need enough to possess such traits. Don't even need a majority, just enough that you can shut down those who care about whatever you are pushing.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:19 AM
29

Only 5 countries even legally allow us to be raped by women to begin with Do you mean "legally acknowledge the rape of men"?
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:02 AM
8

You are accomplishing NOTHING except being a bully For some this is a goal in itself. People can be extremely vicious if you give them the opportunity to kick someone while maintaining a good moral standing.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:32 AM
8

Feminism is cancer. Now that's uncalled for. Cancer isn't as discriminatory.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:28 AM
1

2020 numbers are not as bad as the ones you posted, 21 for the US and 6 for the EU. I suspect part of the difference is due to how large the US is. Europe is much more densely populated which makes medical infrastructure easier. The medical industry is also a clusterfuck of regulation which probably doesn't help. As for the feminists, they are always looking for something to paint women as a victim. The US having a higher number is something they can latch onto to claim discrimination. An honest…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 10:59 PM
1

The US has as well. You just get large scary numbers because The US is huge. Or they just give a multiplier compared to another country. But with such tiny rates even having double another country's is virtually nothing.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:03 PM
33

To understand this, you must first understand that most men are never taught that they must make others comfortable by regulating their emotions. Someone has shoved their head so far into their bubble that they don't know what stoicism is.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 11:41 AM
3

Yes, "The gendered nature of the penal sector, shaped by primarily male institutional actors, results in prisons and jails being designed by men for men. In turn, they are not tailored to women’s needs and experiences." There's a whole branch of feminism that wants to get rid of prison. Teach men not to rape isn't used much anymore but it was a part of the feminist crusade against rape culture. You can find plenty of evidence for this by searching the term or scrolling through #teachmennotorape …
/r/MensRights18/02/24 06:45 AM
3

If feminists actually understood it they'd be pushing for the persecution of female sexual predators. Instead you get stupid shit like "teach men not to rape" and "prison was made for men, therefore we shouldn't put women in there".
/r/MensRights18/02/24 03:38 AM
3

Looking into relationships is a logical extension to attraction. If you know which relationships work, you can aim for them. Done right you'll improve both your life and your partner's.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:39 AM
1

No they tend to ignore men's bad experience. There's a correlation between sexual abuse as a child and becoming a sexual abuser. That should call into question the feminist sexual abuse stats, but they can't to that because it involves questioning their victim mentality.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:24 AM
22

The main question is, why would leftists today have such an infatuation with the idea of manhood is the source of tyranny, rather than acknowledge the blatant sufferings of men? Same reason Jews or capitalism get similar types of blame: It provides an enemy to unify against to justify concentrating power.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 12:18 AM
2

There's actually some data on this. Pew did a survey on people who date and their attitudes towards various traits of a partner. It found that 12% had already had a committed relationship with someone 10 years older and 15% said the same for 10 years younger. The definitely would and would not were also more open to the 10 year gap than not.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 11:37 PM
22

This is why giving custody to the parent that can't afford it is dumb.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:07 AM
2

Alright since this is a scientific survey we can look at what they measured harassment with. As pew states "In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls." Keep in mind that a single one of these behaviors on a date or in a relationship qualifies the individual as harassed. Pressured you for sex Touched you in a way that made you feel uncomfortable Sent y…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 04:21 AM
1

Things will get better. Two of your problems will be solved when you are old enough to sign for yourself. These should be the goal you focus on. You should identify potential problems and work to prevent them. You can start saving the funds you need now for instance. The military requires fitness, lacrosse might be more bearable if you view it as training. If you do quit you'll want to find something else active to do. Also call your grandpa more often, He cares enough to get you a truck.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 12:28 AM
1

I realize it wouldn't exist without sex work. Not true. There are plenty of options for porn that don't require actual people to have sex. Erotic fiction, video games, comics and animation, 3d or otherwise, are all readily available.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 12:05 AM
4

Look, if you are going to claim that a survey is unscientific you could at least link it so we can evaluate it for ourselves.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 11:52 PM
6

Women were an important part of prohibition movement. That was well before the 60s. Their voice was strong enough that there was an amendment passed.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 11:21 PM
2

Strictly speaking the Virginia rape law is sex neutral. However, in these circumstances it only applies to children under the age of 13.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 04:19 AM
3

What the current left in the US has done is link race with ideology. That's why we got that Smithsonian infographic describing "whiteness" as essentially traditional American values or Larry Elder being called the "black face of white supremacy". This opens the door for racists to get to be on "the right side of history" as long as they are willing to toe the party line.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 01:29 AM
3

Or they know big daddy government will come to take them away if they leave a mark on her.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 12:52 AM
3

The apps themselves are not the problem. I'm pretty sure they are part of it. Dating and hookup apps make money when people use their service. They have no incentive to push for a stable relationship as that would get their customers off the app. Worst of all, due to their nature they have all the data they need to optimize for stringing people along.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:06 AM
5

This is and odd case. The article makes it sound like the majority of the blame should fall on the police. The supposed victim never reported him. It was a relative who saw her social media posts reported it. Then I guess investigators decided that no teenage girl would lie on the internet or something and arrested the guy.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:04 AM
1

Often they are incapacitated by drugs or social threats.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:50 AM
2

I think they were under the impression that aid would arrive fast enough that the boats could take multiple trips or she'd sink fast enough that there wouldn't be time to load all the passengers anyway.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:34 PM
1

Feminism is appealing to the left because both support expanding the power of the government.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:47 AM
2

I suspect the demographics of those boys has something to do with it. The study was done under the banner of social justice after all.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:44 AM
5

I'd check with the baby's relatives first. If any of them want to, that's probably the best place.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:39 AM
1

This guy is behind in his child support payments. Let's make it harder for him to make the payments as a punishment. Clearly they aren't thinking of the children.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:36 AM
25

Rape fantasies are actually very common. IIRC something like two thirds of women have them to varying degrees.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:32 AM
1

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is also a good place to check, and has likely far less people with radical opinions. That's because they ban people they disagree with.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:25 AM
3

It's just a different perspective on the past. Men and women had their roles. Each of which came with advantages and disadvantages. It's not unreasonable for someone to consider a life of child bearing and rearing to be the superior choice compared to a life of backbreaking labor.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:13 AM
5

I think you do care. It's just that your trade deal is: you give love and affection in exchange for receiving love and affection from him. Where women often go wrong in this exchange is to assume that men's love and affection only amounts to material goods and women's love and affection is just her presence.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:59 AM
6

There are positions that favor one partner or the other.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:52 AM
1

That article is just another example of a "Feminist" assault on individual liberty, which insinuates that specific personal decisions women make for themselves should be restricted because they allegedly harm women as a class. It's easier to understand these types of people if you think about the class they support as one big super organism. Since they put this organism above the individual it justifies poor treatment of any individual that harms it. Even if that individual belongs to the protec…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:46 AM
4

Generally I'd consider them a different branch of socialism from the Fascists. Much like the Communists and Nazis are. Although there is an amusing bit where the Fascist manifesto has women's suffrage as one of it's demands.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:35 AM
3

Well no sense in arguing with a broken record. Is surreptitiously your favorite word or something?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 03:05 AM
20

They included fondling and grabbing in their measure of sexual victimization. Given that, I'm kind of surprised it's not higher. But that's not the real headline. If you read the paper they said "Analysis of responses to individual questions indicated that 39.80% experienced attempted or completed forced vaginal/anal penetration" That is a number that is ridiculously high.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:54 AM
3

No, I did not insist that a case study does not exist. Funny I distinctly remember you saying "I have never read a fake medical study like that published in a real publication. You are just wrong." in response to my assertion that it's a case study. I said, now pay attention, that a surreptitious study done by sneaking into an mri machine and having some dude read the thing and proclaim what he saw is not a case study and not publishable. That's a strange thing to assert. They tried to publish i…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:11 AM
4

I posted a case study published in a medical journal. Something you insisted didn't exist. This type of research is accepted in the scientific community. The fact that this doctor didn't get to publish says more about the supposed ethics board in Canada than it does about the veracity of the research.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:34 AM
4

Here you go, have an example. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it's nonexistent.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 11:38 PM
6

Rape victims, including males, may be eligible to immigrate to the USA under a special program I think you read that wrong, The purpose of this visa is to allow foreigners to stay in the US to assist in the prosecution of crimes committed in the US. It doesn't provide a path to immigration. Hence why it issues a nonimmigrant visa.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 11:17 PM
8

I found this article on the subject. Although I'd take it with a grain of salt. The author is clearly part of the intersectional left. That clearly colors their view on this.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:46 PM
5

It's a case study. This type of thing is pretty common in medicine at the start of some inquiry. It's essentially a very cheap way of showing that there might be something going on here.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:23 PM
3

I'm neither an atheist nor a religious person Perhaps agnostic would be an appropriate description of how you feel.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:14 PM
1

What does sexual liberation have to do with morality? I genuinely want to understand. It opened the doors for women to sleep around without a care for the consequences. This behavior is still considered immoral when men do it. Fertility is highest in women from late teens to late 20s. Then, women still have a 75% chance of conceiving within the first 12 months at age 30. I know. Remember that I started with "Men are attracted to the younger 20s women because the late 20s don't afford them enough…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:06 PM
2

No its not, they know that people their own age wouldn't put up with it This is clearly false. There are such people.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:23 PM
2

Titanic had more lifeboats than required by law. The issue was that decision was made for circumstances she did not ultimately find herself in.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:20 PM
1

The existence of abusive same age relationships contradicts your reasoning.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:07 PM
10

Fewer than you'd think. There were only 12 dogs confirmed to be on board. Although some may have been essentially smuggled on board. Also, someone opened the kennels before the ship went down. Keep in mind that the Titanic took an unusually long time to sink. They had time to do things like that. It's one of the reasons they didn't have enough lifeboat. The typical sinking would result in a lot of people trapped and drowned. The dead don't need lifeboats.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:48 PM
16

Im pretty sure the animal one is a stereotype, im pretty sure no one gave a fuck about the hundreds of pets on the Titanic. Three dogs survived the sinking, carried onto the lifeboats by the women who owned them. They were small however, two pomeranians and a pekingese.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:14 AM
1

I’m praying Trump gets disqualified so I can vote for someone else who can win. No you don't want that. If the people in power can deny their opposition the right to run it creates a clear road to tyranny.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:48 AM
1

There might be some exceptions, but in general it's not a good idea to date very old people if you're a teenager. That's not something you can conclude from this study. You'd have to take into account the effects of the risky lifestyle and any other potential risk factors to then be able to compare large age gap relationships to more normal ones. As it is, you are basically comparing people who are shit at relationships to those who aren't.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:51 AM
0

I'm sorry but that article is shit. It mentions the destruction of the trade unions but neglects to mention that they were replaced with the German labor front. A massive labor organization controlled by the government. Almost half of Germany were members. That's not a very capitalist thing to do.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:34 AM
5

I think raising a generation of women free from feminist propaganda would be more effective. Unfortunately you're not going to get that without firing most people working in public schools.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:25 AM
1

18/19 year olds who enter age gap relationships have a very high risk of domestic violence, single parenthood, drug use and mental health problems. That's not actually what the study says. "Analyses revealed that the wider the age gap, the more likely both partners were to engage in risky lifestyles (i.e., substance use and delinquency), and risky lifestyles – rather than poor negotiation or decision-making equality – helped to explain associations between age gaps and engagement in sexual inter…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:12 AM
2

Rape culture is real. That's why 48 women are raped every hour in Congo. So we should invade the Congo and impose law and order?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:59 AM
-1

The first comment is easily understandable in an article about a study that id find that women in heels were more attractive. The second is a refutation of heels not being sexualized, an odd assertion by the researchers. The catcalling is used as evidence of sexualization, not condemned as a moral failing of men. The article is remarkably neutral in it's presentation of subjects outside it's scope. The only opinions she actually presents is her disagreement with the researchers on sexualization …
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:38 AM
3

In the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research crime reports for the 5 years from 2018 to 2022, the Bureau reported that there were 138 domestic violence related murders, 18% were children (25), of which approximately half (48%) were girls (the Bureau has difficulty identifying that the majority of domestic violence related murder victims were gasp, boys). Of the 113 adult domestic violence related murders the Bureau reported that approximately half were females (59, 52%), and again, buried …
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:44 AM
5

However, while the study found that women in heels are considered more sexually attractive, the researchers, somewhat confusingly, argued that high heels aren’t sexualized. Based on participants’ responses, wearing heels didn’t seem to “signal any personality traits, or cues to health or intelligence,” which, according to the researchers, means that the women wearing them weren’t being objectified. “Sexualized women are perceived to be less mentally capable, less competent and less deserving of …
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:04 AM
1

That's not actually the case. She said "While heels are often written off as impractical and even sexist in our current, more laid-back era of women’s fashion, it seems they haven’t actually lost their charm after all." That's a comment about the current culture, her views on high heels are clearly positive.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:01 AM
2

long story short, the prejudice i face as a man was dismissed as prejudice and not as sexism. Should have asked them under what conditions prejudice against women isn't sexism.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 02:48 AM
2

Personally I suspect it's due to women's aversion to having sex with men who engage in homosexual activity. If the perception that you are gay can kill your chances with women, it incentivizes sending a strong signal that you are not.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 08:09 AM
4

They'd just blame the men's country for the problems in theirs. Same mindset as the communists who blame capitalism for the many failures of communist countries.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 11:23 PM
1

The birth rate hypothesis should be pretty easy to check. IIRC the CIA world fact book has that info. It's just a matter of comparing the southern African states with more northerly ones.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 07:48 AM
1

I suspect letting the parents choose which school to enroll their children would help quite a bit. Tie school funding to the number of enrolled students and the shittiest schools will die out. Gradually increasing the overall quality of schools. Also would enable shaming schools for treating boys unfairly. I expect many parents would not send their boys to a school that's proven to discriminate against them.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 07:19 AM
-1

Honestly, the modern conception of gender is really useless trash. It's just giving way too much importance to stereotypes until they need to justify society conforming to their whims, in which case they retreat to a biologically deterministic motte.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:58 AM
1

The question at hand is why AIDS is hitting women harder than the men. That's what is said to be causing women to have the shorter life expectancy compared to men. The low life expectancy isn't a surprise. Humanity has dealt with much higher attrition rates in the past compared to what the first world countries have today. The women just have to compensate by having many more children.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:49 AM
6

Chart says it's due to AIDS. Not really sure how that came about though.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:36 AM
1

I don't think under reporting is much of a flaw here. The same criticism could be levied against the studies in the report you shared. On the other hand the PREA data is much more periodical and comprehensive. You can look at trends over time and compare specific institutions. It's much more useful than the report. Although, I suspect that report is part of what got the PREA enacted in the first place which is an important role. It's just outdated and limited.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:21 AM
3

I haven't done an in depth comparison, it's just that the PREA data is much more recent than the studies they are citing. Here is one of the studies on the data if you want to check it out. There is also a yearly report they have to on what data they are collecting.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:11 AM
1

Why does that report neglect the data collection from the prison rape elimination act?
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:44 AM
3

It's nowhere near the worlds longest advertisement. There are plenty of TV shows who's primary purpose was to sell toys. Both Mattel and Hasbro own production companies.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:19 AM
2

IIRC it's something like 5% of the population so it really depends on where you live. In a big city you'll certainly pass by many without realizing it, but a small town might not have any.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 02:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter