TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ErasmusMRA Archive

View 70 posts and 2,327 comments by ErasmusMRA on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
236

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:47 PM
185

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:43 AM
157

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights23/11/12 01:32 PM
88

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:13 AM
87

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:12 AM
74

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:07 AM
62

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights17/12/12 09:29 AM
60

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:10 PM
56

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:48 AM
51

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:20 PM
41

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:27 PM
40

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:32 PM
36

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:54 PM
32

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:09 PM
31

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:27 AM
30

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:42 AM
29

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:33 PM
21

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:05 AM
20

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:45 AM
19

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:53 AM
19

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:28 PM
18

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:40 PM
15

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:18 PM
13

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:50 PM
13

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:51 AM
11

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:19 PM
10

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:55 PM
10

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights29/10/12 10:59 AM
10

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:48 PM
10

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/10/12 01:12 AM
9

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:44 AM
9

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:14 PM
9

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:28 AM
8

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:33 AM
8

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:56 PM
8

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:48 PM
7

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:18 AM
6

ErasmusMRA/r/MGTOW13/11/12 01:25 AM
6

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:09 PM
6

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:58 PM
5

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:06 AM
5

ErasmusMRA/r/MGTOW13/09/12 03:39 PM
5

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:15 AM
5

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:49 PM
4

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:45 PM
4

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:37 PM
4

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:25 AM
4

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights21/10/12 09:20 PM
4

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:45 PM
3

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:47 AM
3

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:14 AM
3

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:50 AM
3

ErasmusMRA/r/MGTOW08/09/12 07:36 PM
3

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:24 PM
3

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:46 PM
2

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:22 PM
2

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:46 AM
2

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:36 AM
2

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:10 AM
2

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:26 PM
2

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:08 PM
1

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:54 AM
1

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:40 PM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:53 PM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights11/11/12 06:01 PM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:18 PM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:21 PM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:05 AM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/seduction31/08/12 07:48 PM
0

ErasmusMRA/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:34 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,327 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I am still shadowbanned after posting that link to an AVFM article. I messaged reddit admins two weeks ago but have heard nothing back. To me it's pretty clear that Reddit has intentionally vague policies in order to use them as a billy club against users they dislike. And yes, they dislike MRAs. They've made it clear time and time again.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:48 AM
2

Yeah I know. I sent them a message.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:22 AM
0

There's a reason we have stereotypes. It's because they're true.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:37 AM
9

And how few have been reprimanded (zero). This is great.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:30 AM
6

We welcome anyone to join our discussions, we do not welcome linking to them. Said without a hint of irony. This right there is what's wrong with 2XC as a subreddit. Not an iota of self-awareness.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:26 AM
-8

Truthfully it seems like she's complaining about nothing. It's true that women cook more, so I see nothing wrong with asking the question.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:53 AM
15

Don't accept being treated with disrespect, being controlled, being made into a servant. And this goes for all areas of life, not just marriage and relationships.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:59 AM
2

Just curious, but how long did you two live together before getting married?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:00 AM
33

Yet.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:03 PM
-5

Oh no, someone is making an emotional argument. Whatever shall I do!
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:49 PM
5

Yep. Strict liability. No mens rea required.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:16 PM
-3

Soon she'll realize that she's missing out on a lot of money. Maybe her car is a few years old and she wants a new one, or maybe she wants to go on another cruise in the Caribbean with her "partner". She'll start hating her "donor" more and more, and because he cheated on her she will convince herself that she deserves that money. This will slowly build up over a few years. She'll find out where her "donor" lives, maybe even hire a private investigator to do so, and will sue him for back child s…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:15 PM
46

The US has strict liability laws. It doesn't matter if you didn't know. It doesn't matter if she showed you a fake driver's license. You're fucked. Literally. And figuratively, too.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:06 PM
0

Blaming white men is a way of avoiding a problem they don't want to deal with. The truth is that almost all ethnic groups are more violent than whites, but it would not be politically correct to say so. Frankly I'm sick and tired of being the target of all this media driven and racially motivated hatred towards me.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:51 PM
2

For many reasons. Family is great, war is challenging and sometimes fun, and people like to succeed. Conquest! Violence! Sodomy! To start a family you need to be attractive enough to the opposite sex to find a mate. War gives men the power to take another's life. Women get wet over men who have that power. Women love violent men because they get to control that power. Success is a means to an end. The end for humans is the same as it is for all life: To reproduce. Success is a means of acquiring…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:47 PM
4

Is it a myth though? Why else do men put up with all this shit? Why do they get tough degrees and go into dangerous jobs? Why do they go to die in foreign wars? Why are men willing to risk so much to get married? Just look at the hoops PUAs jump through. Being attractive to the opposite sex is the primary goal in life for both men and women.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:41 PM
9

This is the updated version with fully text-searchable PDFs.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:36 AM
2

This is exactly why I'm against libel and slander laws. Without such laws people would critically evaluate the information given by others instead of assuming that it's true.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:35 AM
21

No one is even sure of the number of federal laws in existence, let alone state, county and city ones. How can a person know they're not breaking any of them?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:33 AM
59

Imagine what the media and political opponents would say about a politician who wants to lower the age of consent. Politicians have an incentive to take the "tough on crime" stance and criminalize more and more things, and rarely if ever have any incentive to do the opposite.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:19 AM
11

It wouldn't be evidence strong enough to publicly release And who decides what is and isn't strong enough information to be publicly released? This is a clear freedom of speech issue.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:17 AM
24

Ignorance of the law isn't an excuse I always wonder what goes through people's head when they parrot this phrase. Edit: Here's an example. The Lacey Act makes it a crime to: import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law”; or to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in interstate…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:14 AM
5

25) You can not care about your appearance without worrying about about being criticized at work or in social situations I'll just leave this here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXWPikZ4vNo
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:33 AM
12

10) Walk alone at night without the fear of being raped or otherwise harmed Yes. Men are never the victims of violent crimes at night. Men are never afraid. Men are two to three times more likely to be victims of violent crimes.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:31 AM
41

Sounds about right. Only two thirds of schools have a full time male staff member at all. Even if he did target only women, would that make the crime worse? Are they trying to say women are worth more than men?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:29 AM
-6

Good work, AO.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:50 AM
1

That's the feminist theory of gender based on the disproven tabula rasa hypothesis. Feminists embrace it because it's used to support their patriarchy theory -- if both men and women start out as a blank slate at birth, and the outcomes are unequal, then it's proof that women are oppressed. I reject gender theory for the same reason I reject patriarchy theory and other feminist claptrap: It's not based in reality. You are either a man or a woman. There is no in-between. A woman can be a tomboy. …
/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:19 AM
1

Yes, negroplasty.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:48 AM
0

lol. Nice one.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:24 AM
13

Get a job and get out as soon as you can.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:22 AM
0

You talk about the MRM as if it's some monolithic thing instead of a loose collection of individuals with similar goals.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:23 AM
16

Good arguments. If women chant "her body, her choice" then why does someone else have to pay for it? I think the movement failed to reach critical mass and break into public awareness because there were too few of us. Today with the internet being more prevalent ideas can spread more freely.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:06 PM
1

Did he really just argue "Don't blame guns, but do make more gun control laws"?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:44 PM
-1

The unsubstantiated claim these leftist crusaders make is that bestiality hurts animals. You would think they would gather evidence before passing such a law, but no, they are happy to intrude into people's lives based on nothing more than their leftist ideology.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:42 PM
0

Are they really actually doing it to route all penises to them? Just like they do for porn? That might be part of it, but the majority of it comes from rampant leftism which is sweeping the west. It looks like even Germany is not immune.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:37 PM
0

Absolutely. I call it penis envy but there's probably a more tactful way of putting it.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:31 PM
2

Let me ask you this: On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest, how much does the average man detest rape? There are very few men who find rape appealing, or approve of rape. Now what is the chance that all nine of them were in the same room as that girl? And some of them raping her? And they would all stick to the same story and defend the rapists? Do you see how ridiculous that sounds? Here's my take on it: The girl was a party girl and loved getting debauched by a group of men, especia…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:45 PM
6

Michael Moore is the same type of slug as Futrelle.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:25 PM
22

I'll tell you what the others said. Don't go. They'll gang up on you and blame everything on you. I know you're supposed to go into these sessions with an open mind in an attempt to do your best to fix the relationship, but if you listen to them and believe their bullshit it will be a disaster both for you and for your relationship. My advice: Hold your wife accountable for her actions, promises and words Don't fall for her bullshit Don't doubt yourself. Your gut instinct is correct. Trust it. P…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:22 PM
16

What do women want.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:31 AM
1

Three brave women broke into the room and rescued her from rape. Because she was so close to nine men, it was a case of rape by proximity, nine counts of it.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:11 AM
-1

Had to dig up a 6 year old article. Here it is. After the witnesses saw one man having sex with the nearly unconscious teen while another crouched near her face, they broke into the room and took the girl to the hospital. This princess participated in a gangbang while her girl friends were spying on her, got jealous and decided to "rescue" her from the baseball players. It seems prosecutors didn't want all these juicy details all over the courtroom and out in public when the chance of convincing…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:44 AM
4

Your statistics are way too high. It's estimated there were 468000 murders worldwide in 2010. Assuming the numbers were similar in 2000-2005, that's 2800000 murders of people of all ages during that time, compared to your 2350000 murders of children.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:32 AM
6

If you watched the video you wouldn't ask such a question.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:56 AM
7

Troll harder.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:48 AM
0

Very much so! That sarcasm at the end of the video is definitely Pat Condell style. GWW, if you are reading this, are you a fan of his?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:21 AM
5

If you believe that the child of a woman who was raped should be denied the right to see their father, then to be consistent, you have to believe that a woman who rapes a man, gets pregnant as a result and carries the pregnancy to term must have the child taken away from her and given to the father, and the woman must not have contact with the child until it turns 18.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:50 AM
-3

You hit the nail on the head with the universality of ethics. It is only those with relativistic ethics who are susceptible to feminist bullying and concern trolling. Unfortunately that seems to apply to the majority of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:45 AM
-3

Do you think this should not be the case? Should we deny a child the right to see their father? Tell us what you think, and why. Edit: A downvote is not an argument. Instead it demonstrates a complete lack of an argument.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:33 AM
16

If I ran a concert hall I would throw anyone accused out as well. That would be fine with me if the tickets came with a condition saying "If you are accused of a crime you will be evicted from the show with no investigation and no refund." Of course such a rule explicitly stated would lead to accusations and evictions over the most minor issues. The owners want to have their cake and eat it too. If I was OP I would do a chargeback on my credit card or if that fails take the company to a small cl…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:01 AM
3

Your musical instrument is a phallic symbol of patriarchal oppression.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:45 PM
4

Feminist projection as usual. It's the feminists who are 'oppressed' middle class women. I think the average MRA sits pretty low in the socioeconomic strata.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:42 PM
1

Why didn't he get a vasectomy? Because he trusted his wife. There is something seriously wrong with our society when the only way a man can keep his hard earned money is through a non-reversible surgery which makes him sterile. He was completely content to let HER deal with the responsibility and side effects. Birth control is something a married couple talks about and agrees on. Women have plenty of birth control options, so that's what they went with instead of making the man irreversibly impo…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 08:30 AM
1

Let's not feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 03:24 AM
1

Equality through democracy? There's more women than men in the US, so they can vote in for themselves whatever they want. Doesn't sound like equality at all, but a tyranny of the majority.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:04 PM
6

Why not just let people talk about what they want? Get RES and filter all feminism posts if you don't like it.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:26 AM
11

TV, movies and our parents tell us that women love a gentleman. Why would they lie?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:32 AM
1

I'm sorry. Want to start over? Leave the country.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:28 AM
2

What is this, some kind of a riddle? Ask her, not us. P.S. I'd say she's just trying to sound smart.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:24 AM
1

Yeah, she deserves to get raped. Is this what you are fishing for?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:23 AM
2

The feminist blogs are silent about this event. Their position is indefensible.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:18 AM
1

Funny, but not the right subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:11 AM
32

Yeah, seriously.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:44 AM
0

See http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/suzanne-venker-on-womens-rights-mens-responsibilities-and-why-she-divorced-her-first-husband/
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:10 AM
1

Yes. Also, they see our arguments, realize they can't refute them, and throw them at us like a 5 year old who just learned how to 'win' an argument by repeating everything someone else says.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:35 AM
4

Good job. I support free speech.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:25 AM
3

Do you have a question or do you just like quoting parts of people's posts?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:22 AM
1

She'll make a fake account with a picture of some actress and will try to friend you again. Watch for it.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:15 AM
10

Yes, troll and feminist activity has been high since we got exposure from the nov 16 protest. They're like a wild animal, cornered and fighting for their lives.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:12 AM
-2

Who will decide what is equality and what isn't, and what makes you think their answer will be correct? How will such equality be enforced? Way too many people here claim to be egalitarians without having any clue what it means.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:10 AM
2

I'm for a laissez faire treatment of the sexes. The government cannot make the sexes more equal, it can only make them more unequal with their meddling. Once the government is out of the way the market can decide how much each person is worth.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:08 AM
3

Those aren't the only two options. I reject egalitarianism because it cannot work, but that doesn't mean I'm pro-sexism.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:06 AM
0

Looks like the twitter poster was this person: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/sophia-guo-u-of-t-bigot/
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:36 AM
4

This attitude of hostile opposition and willful denial of male issues deeply worries me. Is it really so offensive to some people to imagine that men suffer too? Men are not allowed to suffer. It's part of the patriarchy. Or something.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:05 PM
1

Sure, I'd participate. High level of troll and feminist activity the past few days in this sub.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:06 AM
2

He's right though. Paying people not to work leads to people not working.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:48 PM
3

What's the cause and effect here? Could it be that you were uncomfortable with it because you didn't grow up with it splattered all over TV?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:40 PM
27

Nevermind that. We can do without the patriarchy squads as long as they don't find out about our mansions with secret smoke-filled rooms where us misters sit around a table twirling our mustaches.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:00 PM
1

If that's the case, how do you explain the socialists trying to piggyback on the feminist movement and inciting people into a protest using the means I describe above? Edit: I don't know anything about Europe, but here in the US the organizations touting themselves as socialists are or have been hijacked by Marxists.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:07 AM
1

If it's not a surprise, then why post it?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:44 AM
5

Do you have a specific objection or are you just stating that the email does not meet a certain arbitrary level of proof?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:43 AM
5

The author is free to set up their own prize and distribute it equally between men and women, or only to women, or however they want. What is it with people telling others how they should spend their money?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:51 AM
2

Projection. There's a lot of things she could be doing but isn't because she doesn't care about anyone or anything but herself and stroking her overinflated ego.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:44 AM
9

You give them too much credit. They don't misunderstand the issues, they purposefully misrepresent them.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:27 AM
5

Show me where these "a lot of feminists" are. Do they have a webpage?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:15 AM
7

"Women don't want to work! They just want to take your money!!" "Don't marry women who work! They just want to take your money!!" I'm glad you understand! As SCCROW above said, "Don't marry women, period."
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:11 AM
11

Projection, as usual. I can reply with 'projection' to everything feminists say and I'll be right 90% of the time.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:03 AM
4

I get shivers running down my spine when the government says it's doing something in my best interest.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:52 AM
4

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't immigration pretty open within the EU? If Sweden is the most socialist country offering the best social programs, then all the least productive members of EU will flock to Sweden and consume its resources.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:36 AM
14

Ah, so you found our secret fan club. They're nice guys, they make me laugh.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:31 AM
4

It has to do with USA's protestant roots. We're still stuck with vestiges of victorian era morals.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:20 AM
5

I really hope hope it works out for you Swedes. I really do. But how can you have such lavish social programs and such an open immigration policy and expect it to last?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:07 AM
14

The ones who call themselves socialists are really communists, marxists, leninists, stalinists, and trotskyists. Socialism is a more acceptable word, especially after the red scare in the 60s, so that's what they call themselves. The idea is that the working class will somehow rise up and overthrow the capitalists, violently I might add, take over the means of production, and then there will be a communist utopia. To do this they create as much social unrest as they can, and infiltrate all the o…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:37 AM
2

In sports we separate men and women for the same reason we have special olympics. If we didn't, they wouldn't stand a chance.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:31 AM
4

http://framedfathers.blogspot.com/2010/02/title-iv-d-scam.html Try this.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:51 AM
1

Why did it take him almost 7 minutes to say, "This girl is utilizing popular Youtube MRA's to bolster her own importance by presenting herself as a legitimate threat to them, when in reality, she likely doesn't even embrace the tenets she's pretending to perpetuate, (her appearance alone calls her philosophy into question,) and as a result, she's probably a troll. You must be new here. Welcome to Youtube.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:11 AM
0

How the hell did this get 2 downvotes already? Wonderful post.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:08 AM
4

Doctor Boner?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:01 AM
4

Her plan is to bring peace to the world by killing half of the world's population.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:27 AM
9

http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title04/0458.htm It's all there in black and white. States have financial incentives to break up families, award as much child support as possible and use the most draconian measures to enforce it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:03 AM
5

Excellent work AVFM and Agent Mauve.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:00 AM
1

Note that JtO and even Paul Elam fell for her suicide hoax. It appears JtO has taken down his video where he talked about this poor, misunderstood and misguided young woman.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:50 PM
2

By feminist's logic the rapists would be doing women a favor by killing them afterwards.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:35 PM
7

I've seen the same point argued here on this subreddit. And they were serious. It goes something long the lines of: If you get killed, that's it, you don't care because you're dead. But if you get raped, you get to suffer for the rest of your life. Clearly rape is way worse than murder.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:26 PM
26

Local man finally receives male privilege.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:22 PM
14

Family courts often ignore law and rule any way they like. How the courts explain it: "In the best interests of the child." How it is in reality: "In the best interests of the woman." The system is set up to extract the maximum amount possible from men and give them to women. Each state gets a financial incentive from the federal government for doing so.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:20 PM
4

It's female nature, so it's not limited to western culture. Hypergamy is a global phenomenon. For example, in South Korea when economy hit a downturn, divorce rates jumped up thousands of percent. It's not about men making mistakes. It has everything to do with male's ability to provide for the female. If it's in any way impaired, or if the woman feels she can get a better deal on the market, she's out of there. No fault divorce and our biased family court system only encourages this behavior.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:37 PM
4

They even call us misters!
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:03 PM
3

She's a mother who lost her baby. Hasn't she suffered enough?!
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:38 PM
2

It's very obviously fake and written by men.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:36 PM
-3

A man, simply by looking at a woman, undresses her with his eyes. The camera makes it ten times worse. He's lucky he wasn't charged with rape.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:40 PM
3

Yeah, and someone mugged me in the street and we disagreed on who should have my wallet. Yes, that's a disagreement. It's not a disagreement, it's an assault. It's both. You're watering down the situation. Denying someone access to money is abuse. Your argument is a non-sequitur. Denying money is a contractual issue. The problem with the marriage contract is that it's so vague that no one knows what's going on. The way to resolve it, assuming they can't resolve it like adults, is through the cou…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:29 PM
2

They disagree on who should have access to that money.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:17 PM
4

So you're not saying much of anything. Ok then.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:17 PM
1

That's a disagreement.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:16 PM
4

It's well known that wives just up and leave when the husband loses his job, social status, gets seriously ill, ends up in jail, or gets raped. The reverse is not true. Short of infidelity there is very little that will make a husband leave his wife. If you think this is inaccurate, that wives are either as loyal or more loyal than husbands, you're going to have to provide some pretty damn good evidence to convince me.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:02 PM
1

Show me these feminists who fight for rights of men, and not by paying lipservice to the word 'equality', but with deeds. Show me.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:52 PM
1

It would be abuse if the relationship was that of a parent and a child and the parent refused to provide the child with necessities. These are two adults who can handle a disagreement in adult ways. If there are irreconcilable differences any one of the parties is free to dissolve the arrangement. Stop treating women as if they were children.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:49 PM
29

Generally speaking the rights of a wife against her husband are such as he cannot deprive her of. While his rights against her depend entirely upon her consent, and she can deprive him of them at any time with the greatest ease. -Mrs. Francis M. Scott, March 29, 1910. Sounds about right, 103 years later.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:39 PM
1

Violence is when you physically hurt someone. Not giving someone money isn't violence.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:29 PM
1

It's been posted here at least half a dozen times, if not a whole dozen. Read the rest of the blog and you'll see that it's satire.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:33 AM
6

If I could make money and play video games by pretending to be a victim, I'd to it too. Yep. She graduates with a worthless women's studies degree, and then she's like oh shit, I have to make a living somehow, and no one wants to hire women's studies majors. And then this fell on her lap.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:53 AM
5

Your view of it is too black and white. They went for realism in this scene. This is how a lot of encounters are initiated. The male initiates it and if the female doesn't resist, it's consent. There is a lot of give and take and nuance involved in this dynamic which is lost when looking through the lens of today's definition of rape.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:04 AM
4

Exactly. The penis is a self-cleaning organ under the foreskin. It can go a long time without needing to be washed, if at all. Although these days people are conscious of hygiene, so if you are planning to have sex I recommend washing it. The circumcision apologist's cleanliness "argument" couldn't be more wrong.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:49 AM
3

I'd be more concerned about the link between pot and schizophrenia.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:39 AM
16

I've seen other people around the internet mention doing it for their spouses I've heard of this too, shortly followed by "I was talked into a circumcision and it ruined my sex life." Those who don't remember having a foreskin are lucky because they don't know what they're missing.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:38 AM
4

I would tell her that this isn't what we agreed on, and if she doesn't change, I would terminate the contract. What I wouldn't do is call it domestic violence.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:16 AM
-3

Even back then it was based on a grain of truth, only exaggerated. These days? No exaggeration needed.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:19 AM
-2

Where do all you 0-day accounts come from? It's as if there's an organized invasion these last few days.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:54 AM
4

If that's the case, then they're even more ignorant about male anatomy. The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis at birth, and does not detach until later, sometimes as late as puberty. Until then it should not be forcefully retracted as it can cause damage. It does not need to be cleaned as it is a fully self-cleaning organ. Imagine if a father said he has to douche his little girl's vagina every day because it gets dirty down there. This is something akin to that.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:52 AM
-5

Feminists fight for equal rights. Go back to the hole you crawled out of.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:28 AM
-3

Police have seized the phone and believe there may be more victims. What the fuck. Victims of what? It's dangerous to be a man in Canada. Edit: This thread was linked from a known hate sub. Thanks for the downvotes.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:57 AM
13

That site is an obvious satire or false flag or whatever you want to call it.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:55 AM
5

I provided one example. Hypergamy and women initiating 70-90% of divorces would be another. For some reading check out War Brides and Stardusk's response. I'm sure nobody here is surprised by any of this. Now if you want to disagree, that's fine, but you will have to back up your claims instead of simply contradicting me.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:52 AM
10

Don't forget that the police pressure the eyewitness to misidentify the suspect if they have no other suspects. It's all part of the system. The whole lineup process is flawed. It makes the eyewitness identify the person who looks the most like the assailant by looking at the differences between the subjects. A less error prone process would involve using photographs and presenting them one at a time.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:52 AM
12

It's always like this. If a man and a woman are involved in a crime, they get the woman to testify against the man and let her go. There's a section on this in Warren Farrell's The Myth of Male Power. It makes sense. Women have little or no loyalty -- they flock to the winning side. Just look at french women during Nazi occupation. If she sees that her husband is going to jail, he might as well be dead. And what was the punishment to those women after the end of the war? They had their heads pub…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:38 AM
8

lol. You obviously never been to that sub.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:37 AM
6

I don't know the rules, but if the updates were circulated to backers only, then by posting them elsewhere they were "leaked". I'm saying that it's an excuse she'll use in her next update to keep her bullshit going.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:31 AM
20

Why would you post in that hate sub? Don't give them the satisfaction of deleting your post or banning you. They really get a kick out of it.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:19 AM
8

It's ugly "I find my son's sexual organ unattractive so I must mutilate it." you have to clean it "I will amputate my son's fully functioning organ to spare him the effort of having to clean it." women don't like that sort of thing "I will mutilate my son's genitals because some women prefer it that way." it really hurts when you're older "I have no fucking clue what I'm talking about."
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:17 AM
16

Thanks. Just what I thought, a bunch of bullshit and excuses which she didn't want to post publicly where they would be exposed as such. I bet on the kickstarter page she can ban anyone who disagrees with her, or at least delete their posts. So far I’ve chosen to keep my small crew out of the limelight to try and shield them from any potential harassment. When I feel it is safe and appropriate to introduce them I will. Oh, yeah, that harassment excuse again. How convenient. Update #2 will be: We…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:11 AM
1

The court deemed it to be in the best interest of the child to not have shared custody. This is the excuse the court uses every single time it rules against the father. Best interest of the child is a codeword for best interest of the woman.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:51 AM
5

The kickstarter pages say for backers only. Any idea what they say?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:04 AM
41

Her Feminist Frequency channel hasn't been touched for 6 months. The last video she did was the kickstarter video. Prior to that she was doing one video every month or two. If that's not "cashing out" I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:03 AM
29

In today's legal climate, if she thinks it's sexual harassment, it's sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:47 PM
1

I'm so sorry. Worst case scenario you are going to end up like this man, jailed for 14 years for nonpayment of child support. Once you are behind on child support, there is no due process. Your driver's license is taken away and your passport is denied. And you could be jailed indefinitely for being in contempt of court. Leave the country while you can. If you wait too long you won't have a choice.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:55 PM
2

Do admins even use the normal ban any more? Every time i hear of someone getting banned it's a shadowban. They must be getting some sick sense of pleasure from knowing the target of their ban will be wasting time submitting articles and making posts which will not be seen by anyone. Reddit is run by kids. Reddit CEO acts like a douchebag and you're right, there is no accountability at all. I can't wait for competition to reddit to spring up. There's a market for it.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:21 PM
1

I never said the ship won't sink...
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:03 PM
1

The statistics in the article substantiate my claim.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:48 PM
26

Did you click the link? It clearly says suicide. Threatening to commit suicide is also domestic violence and is listed elsewhere on that page.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:43 PM
97

Haha, there's more gems on that page. Social Abuse: • Refused to do housework or child care Financial Abuse: • prevents you from having access to money. In other words, if you're not doing literally everything she asks and giving her everything she asks for it's considered domestic violence.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:42 PM
1

No it's not.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:28 PM
6

not only are mothers more likely to question the practice in the first place, they are also more willing to accept their husband's decision on the subject. I am under the impression that the exact opposite is true. Do you have a link to back that up?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:27 PM
3

what gives you the optimistic idea that feminism is on the decline? It has run itself into the ground. US is in debt and can no longer support itself. Meanwhile men are refusing to marry and work. It's the perfect storm.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:49 AM
7

"It is logically impossible for a man to be considered “stronger” than a woman if he, in fact, cannot take any action that would manifest this comparative advantage into reality."
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:34 AM
0

Why post in hate subs? They'll just remove your post (they did) and then ban you.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:31 AM
1

Like I said, it's a conjecture. That's what the word 'probably' means in my original post. The feminist's cries of "biotruth!" did nothing to disprove my conjecture. Unless you can substantiate every step of your explanation you've got nothing to go on. But of course you can't, if you could you'd have published a paper about it and the matter would be settled until new evidence came to light, if it ever did. And I don't have to. That's what the word conjecture means. If your hypothesis can expla…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:23 AM
7

She then got emotional and stormed off, calling us insensitive. My friend and I both feel bad because obviously the issue hits close to home for her, but our intention wasnt to say our experiences were similar to hers. We wanted to say legally it was and that the law is wrong, yet she still made us feel bad for saying that. Its just annoying... oh well sorry to rant. Women are very good at emotional bullying and emotional blackmail. That is, they're good at "making men feel bad". This was no acc…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:12 AM
8

I'm pretty sure the typical case of circumcision is the mother nonchalantly given the consent form to sign a day or two after giving birth. She signs it without a second thought.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:09 AM
7

Excellent article. These are the statistics we cite to prove that male rape is as prevalent as female rape. Should we be revising that?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:03 AM
1

Yes, yes it is. That doesn't alter the truth value of my conjecture.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:48 AM
0

And the feminists favorite animal is... the hyena! The female hyena is stronger and faster than the male. She dominates all aspects of society. Her clitoral hood forms a pseudopenis which is almost indistinguishable from the male's penis which she retracts during sex. And yes, that means she can't be raped. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icx5TucPZpw
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:39 AM
9

According to them they're exercising their free speech rights by tearing down your posters, and you're violating their free speech rights by stopping them from doing so.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:14 AM
-3

I'll repeat what I said: I know it's a difficult concept for you to grasp, but do try: free speech is not violence and violence is not free speech. Repeat that until you understand what it means.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:59 AM
2

I noticed an unusually high troll and feminist activity these last few days.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:50 AM
-2

Realistically, these women aren't the type to react to intimidation. There is even a good chance that they might retaliate against you or MensRights as a whole. At some point you can either keep escalating the situation until someone is physically harmed, and the other is in jail. Are you fucking serious? Victim blaming? You're telling us that we should not defend ourselves because it might provoke them even more? We will not tolerate their violence, bullying, threats and intimidation. We're not…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:40 AM
19

Thanks for showing us what this subreddit is really like. Every day I see posts saying something like "you shouldn't do x because it's making us look bad", "you're making the MRM look bad", "this is bad for our image", and so on. I was content with dismissing them as isolated incidents, as concern trolls, but now I see that was not the case. Rather than being the exception, they're the norm. And this is why the feminists are so terrified of AVFM. You won't kowtow or apologize to them. Their tact…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:27 AM
-4

Who the fuck are you to tell me what I can or cannot do? I support free speech just as much as I support Men's Rights, just as much as I support Women's rights. It seems you don't understand what free speech means. You support censorship just like the rest of your feminist friends. Just because these are some serious bitches (and I don't throw that word around), doesn't mean they deserve "punishment". Yes they do. Bad behavior must be punished or we will see more of it. If anything did happen to…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:02 AM
0

We're fully aware of your feminist's cry of "biotruths!" That doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt to interpret and understand the data.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:39 AM
-1

The whole point is to expose feminists for the violent ideologues that they are. I don't see how knowing where they live and so on aids in that. They will think twice about hate speech and violence if it's no longer anonymous. If it also discourages this kind of misandry by making them accountable for it, so much the better Probably just makes it worse. How? Having them flee underground with their feminist tails between their legs would be a desirable outcome as well. Next time they show up with…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:51 AM
-5

The whole point is to expose feminists for the violent ideologues that they are. If it also discourages this kind of misandry by making them accountable for it, so much the better. Having them flee underground with their feminist tails between their legs would be a desirable outcome as well. Your hatred of everything AVFM is not rational.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:27 AM
2

So we shouldn't punish criminals because they will find ways of not getting caught.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:19 AM
2

Excellent. Keep us updated.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:05 AM
2

Sure you can. Most rapes are not reported to police. But people do admit they happened in anonymous surveys.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:04 AM
0

Probably has to do with how we evaluate potential mates. A woman's face tells her age and thus her ability to produce healthy children. But when a woman looks at a man she makes a judgement about his ability to provide and protect, which wouldn't have much to do with the face.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:20 AM
-1

They're leftists. Being apolitical means they should be free to talk about wanting more socialism without receiving any criticism for it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:52 PM
1

If you haven't figured it out yet, they don't like Bernard around here.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:22 PM
0

Newsflash: They're everywhere on the internet and reddit. Nothing special about AVFM in that sense.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:11 PM
5

Ah, yes, patriarchy hurts men too and feminism is the cure.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:47 PM
2

On a positive side, it appears that many people were quick to film the incident, which means plenty of evidence for the police when they get involved. That was my first thought too, but if marriage laws are anything like in the US the car will be deemed marital property even if it belongs to the husband. Cops won't do a thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:11 PM
7

Women and feminists oppose porn and prostitution because it breaks the monopoly on their sex cartel. It's hard to get your husband to do what you want by denying him sex when he can turn to porn and it's hard to get a good deal in a marriage when it's cheaper for the man to pay a prostitute on a regular basis.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:50 AM
1

It's a relative of NAFALT. Having a name for it is great... feminist denial syndrome. I got a file full of quotes of famous feminists. It helps.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:34 AM
2

Finally got around to watching it. Unbelievable. It takes a lawyer to really put things in perspective.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:12 AM
6

I hear they're working on a new version with fully searchable full text pdfs. Now you can see how many times genocide and castration are mentioned.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:08 AM
4

Yes, we are anti-feminist. We've seen feminism do everything in its power to hurt men in the last 50 years. It's about time we start fighting back. See this video to get an idea what fathers put up with today.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:06 AM
5

But doesn't willfully exposing ourselves to those images present a problem? Isn't there something wrong with seeing that kind of gross power imbalance repeated so often? Similar to being exposed to - say - consistent portrayals of racist imagery? Are you trying to say that voluntarily looking at people having sex, which is an act as natural as breathing, is somehow wrong? I don't follow. You don't have to look at porn if you don't like it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:03 AM
18

Let's treat women as adults who can decide for themselves whether porn is degrading to them and whether they want to do it. Same thing for prostitution. It's past time the government got the hell out of our lives and let two consenting adults make an exchange they desire to make.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:13 AM
12

They can't enforce rules in subs they don't mod.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:49 AM
10

Tell him your son should decide for himself whether he wants a piece of his wiener chopped off. By the way, I assume your husband is circumcised, which means his desire to circumcise your son is a denial of the fact that his parents did damage to him as a baby. He doesn't want to admit this to himself, and he's willing to do the same thing to his son just so he doesn't have to face it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:42 AM
4

I see what you're trying to say. Feminism is different from men's rights. Feminism starts with the assumption that men are the problem and that women are oppressed. In women's gender studies classes they work themselves in almost a religious fervor hating on men. Yes, feminists hate men and even the boys they raise.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:21 AM
3

But to say that "Violence, when contemplated against children, or men, especially when doled out by state functionaries is what gets [feminists] wet" is incredibly offensive. Just because you are pro-men/for equal rights for men does not mean that you would take pleasure from the abuses of women. You're not making any sense.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:12 AM
91

I don't think feminism will help him with that. Because he's a man.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:12 AM
7

Yep. Her and Warren Farrell are my two favorite mainstream MRAs, even if neither of them would admit to being one.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:11 AM
27

Also good news: check out the youtube search results for "feminism".
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:08 AM
4

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/14f06j/avoiceformen_probably_shadowbanned_for_doxxing/ The thread is still up and is showing up in the sub. Is it possible you clicked on the post's link which links to /u/avoiceformen which is shadowbanned, so it said "page not found", making it look like the thread was deleted?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:01 AM
9

Seen it before. I'm pretty sure it's fake.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:56 AM
18

To them, when it comes to abortion it's black and white. "Her body her choice." But "his body his choice?" Nope, he's a slave.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:25 AM
7

Yeah, she gave her name in the video. It was Danielle Sandhu. They might've taken the video down since then. This was right after the protest when it wasn't such a big deal yet.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:11 AM
-1

Yes it is, but I trust my gut instinct until I get evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:52 AM
-8

They look and act like typical manginas, both in the video and based on their pro-SRS and anti-MR bias when it comes to banning users and enforcement of rules.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:50 AM
9

I'm not sure how to feel about that website. It seems to be vaguely pro-censorship, or censorship by mobbing anyway. You're calling free speech censorship. I'm a strong believer in free speech. I believe that the solution to free speech you disagree with is more free speech not censorship.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:44 AM
2

Reddit admins are hypocrites. We already know that from the violentacrez saga. Considering that reddit admins are these guys, is it any wonder they are anti-men's rights?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:32 AM
13

Like all totalitarian regimes, reddit admins don't explicitly define the rules but ban selectively when something they don't like is done by the users. For example, /r/creepshots was never against the rules but they strategically chose to ban it at the same time as /u/violentacrez was doxxed by Gawker. I can't wait for a competitor to reddit to come along.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:28 AM
7

More importantly she held positions such as student body leader and some other one in 2011 and 2012.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:22 AM
6

Evidence like you deleting your post history every few days?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:17 AM
6

We know about your SRS affiliation and hate for AVFM and Paul Elam.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:07 AM
3

Did you and your SRS friends get him banned?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:03 AM
6

Right on :).
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:59 AM
6

I'm sure AVFM is working on it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:16 AM
8

She's using it as an excuse to break up with you.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:07 AM
2

I doubt that can be enforced. The contract says "You may take this money on the condition that all your future marriages have a prenup." What happens if he takes the money and then breaks the contract? Anyway, this tries to get around something that shouldn't be a problem. If she has a problem with a prenup then all she cares about is your money. Bullet dodged.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:05 AM
3

With each post I'm less and less sure what your beliefs are. Instead of trying to figure out your views, let me explain what I mean by discrimination. There are two types of discrimination. Government mandated discrimination compelled by force, and voluntary discrimination by individual. Discrimination simply means choice. If I choose to reply to your post, I discriminate against all other posters. Should I not have that right? If I choose to sell my goods to Bob instead of Alice, should I not h…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:01 AM
2

NO, I do not believe we should have government mandated discrimination against ANY group of people, BUT because we already had it, as in the past, we should, at least try to make up for that. That seems like a contradiction to me. Discrimination is wrong, but because we had it in the past, we should have it today? Look, I fully understand you are all pissed off about it and even want to do something about it. So are a lot of other people on the other side of the issue. I bet! If I was part of th…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:29 PM
2

Oh, so you want equality of outcome. So if one race, sex, sexuality or dessert preference is doing better in society than another, we should take from them and redistribute it to others? I believe that one person does not have the right to aggress against another person. But you believe that if I have more stuff than you, then you have the right to take it from me by force. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I don't want to misrepresent your views.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:12 PM
4

So you think that we should have government mandated discrimination against whites because of ancestral crimes against blacks. Do you believe the same about women? According to feminists, women were treated "worse than animals" in the past. Should we have government mandated discrimination against men because of that?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:04 PM
2

I see that there is nothing to discuss here. You support legalized anti-white discrimination and I do not.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:57 PM
2

Nobody deserves to be discriminated against, right? That's what people accept without question, isn't it? Discrimination has taken on a meaning of something that's bad, and when someone points and says "discrimination!" everyone agrees and says "let's ban it!" The Dear Colleague letter was justified by its author on the basis of anti-discrimination laws. Can you explain what you mean by "Nobody deserves to be discriminated against" without using that word?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:50 PM
2

I'm not aware of any legalized discrimination against people of color.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:39 PM
11

If you consider "white power" groups dangerous or racist (and maybe you don't), why isn't "male power" similarly situated or antagonistic? Why is "white rights" and "white power" wrong but "black rights" and "black power" right? Do you think white people don't face discrimination? My state has legalized discrimination against white men when it comes to hiring for government jobs. Universities in united states heavily discriminate against white applicants due to affirmative action. Do you think w…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:21 PM
48

Awesome. Good job on your work spreading this to other subreddits, /u/MittRomneysCampaign.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:09 PM
2

Now I have. Almost makes me rage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idwgSTvjdfI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaD3kHc1Gh8 Not sure which video you meant. There are several. In the 2nd one the security guards engage in slapping the men as they exist the car. Wtf?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:05 PM
2

Brazil is another place that needs Men's Rights badly. Anyone here from Brazil who can say more about it?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:49 PM
3

Russlynn Ali who was responsible for the Dear Colleague letter stepped down. Let's hope this nonsense goes away with her. But who knows -- maybe she was pressured from above to write it.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:53 PM
2

Interesting conjecture. I see the relationship between religion and single motherhood differently. First we have decrease in religiosity in the 20th century, which lets feminism spread to fill the religious vacuum. Feminism then creates single mothers.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:47 PM
5

Yes. MRAs seem more numerous and better organized in Canada than in UK, US, and AU.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:42 PM
1

Excellent find. Probably a one man operation. The guy in the photo shoot. The website has grammar and spelling almost as bad as the ad. The whole thing is full of buzzwords which don't mean a damn thing.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:34 PM
1

So, a women's studies major then.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:29 PM
0

Looking at a woman? Eye rape.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:23 PM
1

are you going to tell me now that gay people should be "educated" into not being gay? I said teach them and society to accept who they are. The equivalent for gay people would be teach gays and society to accept who they are. We already do that for gay people. If a person had a disorder where they believed they were an amputee, should we indulge them too? Should we cut off their legs or arms or whichever part they want? I'm all for personal freedom, but a sick person is not in the right state of…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:08 PM
-1

SuicideBanana is that you?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:48 AM
-1

Note that the man wasn't charged with kidnapping, because she stayed there out of her own free will.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:47 AM
1

You're thinking tactically? You're doing exactly what they want. The more you censor yourself, the more they win. And if you keep going in that direction they will not stop until you're on your knees begging them "May I please say a word?" It doesn't matter what we say. They will attack and quote mine and there is nothing you can do to stop it. You make me sick.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:42 AM
13

But we have to STOP CALLING EVERYTHING RAPE! IT ISN'T RAPE!! Feminists started it. The word doesn't mean anything any more.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:04 AM
0

No, fuck you, buddy. We don't need your "you're making us look bad" concern trolling I've heard a thousand times before.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:02 AM
2

Birth control + condom and emergency contraceptives if necessary and you have a better chance of winning the lottery than getting pregnant. Contraceptive "failure" happens from either negligence or fraud. Her body, her responsibility.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:57 AM
6

The fact that they're so successful says a lot about the rest of our society.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:45 AM
5

I disagree with the article. The problems are created not by legalization of prostitution, but because Holland is the only place where it's legalized. Naturally men flock to Holland to do their thing, some of them having tastes for younger women. Concentrated presence of customers drives the demand, and the gangs are only too happy to oblige.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:39 AM
13

Ouch. Discussing abortion in /r/politics? That's some Grade A masochism. Scratch that. Discussing anything in that sub is masochism.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:21 AM
6

I'll tell you how it's likely to go. She'll say she didn't think about it and that everyone else was circumcised. Or she'll say it looks cleaner/neater. If you say that you would have rather had an intact penis, she will get defensive. Is this a conversation you want to have?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:18 AM
2

People with Gender Identity Disorder should be given help, not have their delusions enabled with sex change operations. Enabling their delusions instead of teaching them and society to accept themselves for who they are is why the rate of suicides for trans people is so high.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:10 AM
3

Sentences for rapists and other sex offenders could become tougher to recognise the long-term psychological harm they cause. More damage than murder? Rape can already get longer sentences than manslaughter. I hope they're not trying to argue that damage caused by rape is worse than damage caused by murder.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:56 AM
1

No. You can cower all you want, but I will not be bullied by them. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:47 AM
6

Publicly available information (OMG!!!111oneone I just doxxed a company!!) : Entity Name: DEFENSE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Entity Number: C3496695 Date Filed: 08/03/2012 Status: ACTIVE Jurisdiction: CALIFORNIA Entity Address: 3910 PROSPECT AVE Entity City, State, Zip: YORBA LINDA CA 92886 Agent for Service of Process: CHAZ MCKINNEY Agent Address: 3910 PROSPECT AVE Agent City, State, Zip: YORBA LINDA CA 92886
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:40 AM
4

Does that mean that basically the man is the determining factor of what happens to her and the child? The woman is. Her body, her responsibility for proper contraceptives.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:22 AM
6

Remove government from our reproductive lives and you solve the problem. The woman is responsible for getting pregnant because it is her body. And if she wants help raising a child? Get the man to pledge support in a legal contract called marriage 2.0. Children will be born only if they are wanted by both parents. Abortion will not be an issue.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:00 AM
5

When you're 13 and have no stable source of income? Probably not much.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:08 AM
9

Try kids as adults when convienent, try adults women as kids when convienent. Nice.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:00 AM
5

With $40,000 worth of gifts the money must've been trickling down to his friends, too. They didn't want the gravy train to stop.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:59 AM
8

Remember that our society is biased heavily towards women. If it's good for women, money will be extracted at gunpoint from taxpayers and put to that purpose. If it confers an advantage to men, legislation will be passed to delay or ban it outright. The left will oppose ectogenesis on moral grounds (they'll make something up, as they usually do), and the right will oppose it on religious grounds. If ectogenesis will be developed it will be outside of the US. Maybe we should tout ectogenesis as a…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:53 AM
4

That has to be the worst job ad I've ever seen. And they want to see a picture, too? My troll sense is tingling. I don't think I'd apply for that ad no matter how desperate I was for a job, even if it didn't ask for females.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:28 AM
7

This is what happens when we stuff universities full of women's studies majors while having no demand for them in the marketplace. Either government or corporations create busy work for them using our money (social workers, HR) or they turn to.. this.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:07 AM
8

She's a professional victim. She leveraged her "rape threats" and used selective moderation (to approve only the most abusive comments.. see, this is why we need feminism!) during her kickstarter to swindle the internet out of $200,000.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:01 AM
9

It sounds like she's claiming regardless of what the paperwork says. I know someone who was addicted to the tax breaks and kept claiming a child as dependent illegally. I would: Double check the paperwork to make sure it's unambiguous who is supposed to claim your child as dependent and when. Does it have a start date, and who claims first? Let your ex know when you are claiming your child as dependent. If she continues to claim your child as dependent, she's breaking the law and that's between …
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:56 AM
65

It's sexual assault and that's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:19 AM
18

Awesome.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:23 AM
2

Nice work. Btw, I suggest you use png instead of jpg for the image format.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:00 AM
2

Did you even read the article? There's more to it than just that sentence.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:27 AM
-1

Keep up the good work, Paul. Some of us are behind you 100%.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:25 AM
-3

It's a way of keeping people accountable for their actions. Those who choose to spread hate and violence in the name of feminism will think twice because it might be their mug on AVFM and register-her.com
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:23 AM
7

I'm glad she scammed the gaming community and keeps profiting off her "victim" status. The gamers who donated now see feminism for what it is and will be less susceptible to it in the future.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:11 AM
3

Oh lawl, they turned off both comments and ratings. I'm guessing the rating bar would be 80% in the red.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:09 AM
7

Is this what our... enemies look like? What a bunch of pissants.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:34 AM
2

He reads Heartiste and writes about game on his blog, so this isn't out of the ordinary.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:18 PM
9

Check your human privilege.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:03 PM
0

We protect the anonymity of the accuser but not the accused. His picture might be all over the media painting him as a rapist just from the accusation. You never know.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:22 PM
1

It's still patriarchy oppressing them. Somehow.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:18 PM
2

Right on.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:17 PM
12

Ouch. That's 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:07 AM
73

Love the idea behind the poster, but there's room for improvement. I get a sense that in a way your poster is saying that men don't want to be dads. The thing is, he doesn't become a dad. He becomes a slave. After he becomes a slave he can petition the courts and fight for his right to be a father. And god help him if they aren't married. His consent to sex isn't consent to slavery. While technically true, maybe the message is too strong. His consent to sex isn't consent to fatherhood. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:16 AM
6

Not sure who is downvoting you. This is an excellent suggestion.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:13 AM
-1

It's like they live in a bubble of alternate reality, a bizarro mirror world. For example, they use makeup, lipstick and high heels to trick men into thinking they are more attractive than they really are, yet blame these things on the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:10 AM
2

Why? There is a huge market and demand for this, why can't it be commercially viable at some price point? Not when it costs a billion dollars to get a drug approved by the FDA.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:44 AM
14

Man up and marry our sluts.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:24 AM
1

Oh, no doubt about that. What I wanted to estimate was the number of black children not born due to abortion becoming legal. That is, the effect of eugenics. The high abortion rate for black women means they don't have access to birth control (even though planned parenthood is giving away condoms?) and obviously there's a lack of sex education. But I have never seen feminists talk about this issue. Never. They don't care. They only care about the "plight" of middle class white women like themsel…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:51 AM
10

Part I Part II Part III Part IV Edit: Added part III and IV
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:42 AM
7

I can't believe they would stoop so low. Was it good porn though?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:32 AM
2

Would they really shoot a 3 year old?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:28 AM
1

I tried to dig up the birth rates for black women before abortion became legal and I just can't find it. Arrr.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:06 AM
1

There, changed the link to the new one.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:45 AM
1

Holy crap. WTF?? Year 2007 Race Fertility Rate Per 1000 women Abortion Rate per 1000 women All 68.6 19.5 White 67.8 13.8 Black 71.9 48.2 White women have 1 abortion for every 5 children, compared to 1 abortion for every 1.5 children for black women. Edit: Replaced birth rate with fertility rate. I think these numbers make more sense.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:36 AM
3

Hmm, the download seems to be split up into 1.7mb chunks. I fished one out but it's the middle of the stream... Probably easier to get it from one of those sites.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:26 AM
7

Without the draft the government would need popular support to fight a war. Without that support they will not start one. It's one way to keep the government in check.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:19 AM
4

If you're a man, whatever is wrong you did it to yourself. If you're a woman, you're a victim of circumstance. Similar stats for homelessness in the US. Not sure about deaths, or the reason for it.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:53 AM
1

Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. Oh, that's nice! Unfortunately if you reward having kids with welfare and child support, that abortion option won't be exercised.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:51 AM
14

No draft at all. If we get invaded by China we'll get enough volunteers. If we can't get enough volunteers to level some third world country? Tough shit.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:27 AM
6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JymN5yu-K_o This is why.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:00 AM
7

I'm so sorry. That's definitely not normal and downright abusive.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:48 AM
3

The paper says that we either use empathy or logic, but not both at the same time.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:34 AM
13

Does she also complain that he is never home, as if he's off in a bar enjoying himself somewhere?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:31 AM
4

If the welfare queens he fucked had to pay to raise their own kids they would have never spread their legs for this man, not without proper contraceptives. I blame the broken welfare system which allows this to happens for which all of us pay for. That's right, you're paying for these six mothers to raise his nine kids.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:22 AM
8

That one uses a java app to do it. I didn't want a website running code on my computer, so I avoided it.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:17 AM
13

Means - Having a Penis Motive - Being a man Opportunity - Proximity to a female
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:14 AM
3

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912010646 This?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:12 AM
13

The judge gave them 60 days to comply. I'll be following this story closely. I doubt they will hand the baby over. The adoptive parents already raised $25k on their blog to help them fight the legal battle of holding on to a baby that's not theirs. The family court system is so biased against men that a biological father might lose his child to a complete stranger.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:51 AM
9

The link is in my post above.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:45 AM
5

This is bullshit, and shouldn't be here. I disagree. I think the best way to ensure the movement thrives is to not restrict people on the topics on which they want to discuss. "Women doing bad things" is a popular theme because it runs counter to the public perception that women are all things nice, sugar and spice. This is part of the red pill deprogramming, which can only be done through repeated exposure to these things.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:31 AM
4

It works for me. Try to copy&paste the link? Or click this.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:16 AM
3

The media is having trouble "making a story out of it" because it runs counter to the cultural narrative. See this video.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:05 AM
5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BuiXO7hOuc#t=478s Don't rage too hard.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:02 AM
25

Right. I just saved it in 720p mp4.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:54 PM
55

Wow. If you know how, download a copy of this video and mirror it on your own channel if this one gets taken down. Edit: If anyone else wants to save it just in case, you can do it here.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:45 PM
13

Means, motive and opportunity are necessary but not sufficient to prove someone's guilt. It must be proven that the opportunity was taken by the defendant. In the case of rape, defensive wounds would be a good example of that. That's physical evidence. If means, motive and opportunity was sufficient to convict we'd have a lot more innocent people in prison.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:40 PM
2

Ah, I quickly skimmed the article and I thought it said the female construction workers complained. That's even more ridiculous. What a sexist bitch. They are men and they are working.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:33 PM
10

Like what? Assuming there are no witnesses.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:48 PM
4

If the construction company had any sense they would fire such inconsiderate employees. The women, of course, who delayed construction and billed for hours they did not work (also called theft, or payroll fraud).
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:40 PM
3

Beautiful work, Mr. The Other.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:36 PM
15

I see what you're saying, but physical evidence isn't needed to consider someone guilty. Without physical evidence you'd be convicting a man to many years in prison solely based on the word of the accuser. You cannot allow that to happen regardless of how many rapists go free.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:19 PM
26

Women used emotional reasoning, men used fact based reasoning. It's unsurprising that they arrived at different conclusions. Fact based reasoning: "There are inconsistencies and holes in her story. Therefore not all that she's saying is true. I can't convict a man on such flaky testimony." Emotional reasoning: "The girl seems upset and claims she was raped. If she wasn't raped she wouldn't be so upset. Therefore the man raped her." Both men and women can use emotional reasoning, but women are mo…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:16 PM
4

Even here the feminists put out videos which made it look like the cops attacked them unprovoked. They would use such videos to create sympathy and get new members. When the videos first came out, I had to argue (based on thin evidence) that: Video was spliced in such a way as to make the cops look bad Feminists were physically blocking the doors The cops were patient in asking them to move The cops physically moved the protesters as a last resort None of them were obvious from the video, and ev…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:31 PM
2

Then they would have been the victims. These cops are heroes for making the feminists look bad. It's an age old terrorist tactic to provoke the authorities into violence and then use that for propaganda purposes to gain popular sympathy and new recruits. Feminists are cultural marxists, so such tactics are natural for them.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:09 PM
3

It's a bot.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:05 PM
71

Thanks for posting, although nothing about your story surprises me in the least, least of all the 50/50 split. If I was on a jury and there was no physical evidence, I wouldn't have to think twice about voting "not guilty". People will always look at him and think "he's the guy that got arrested for raping a girl once" Most likely people will think "He got away with rape."
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:02 PM
2

TIL getting pregnant means having no rights to your body anymore. The fetus is not part of the woman. It's a separate entity which depends on the woman for resources which are necessary to sustain its life. The fetus has its own DNA -- it is nothing like any organ that is part of the woman. At conception the fetus is granted permission to occupy the woman's body until birth. The consent happens biologically. The woman cannot withdraw that consent ex post facto, killing the entity which created i…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:50 PM
1

The obvious difference with abortion is that the baby is feeding off someone's body, and they have to consent to that. They already consented at conception. Withdrawing that consent is like consenting to donate an organ, and then withdrawing your consent after it was transplanted.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:29 PM
2

If you look at history, things like infanticide and child labor were necessary for our survival. But as soon as food production increased sufficiently to not need either of them, they fell out of favor. Our morality changes based on resources available. Which is why legalized abortion is so baffling to me -- it seems to reverse that trend. Abortion is not necessary for our survival. There is enough resources around to take care of all those kids. But what if our morality isn't based on absolute,…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:25 PM
2

You joke...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:07 AM
1

It sounds like the same exact argument could be used against abortion.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:06 AM
0

Killing their unborn babies isn't enough for them, they want to "abort" them post-birth as well.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:04 AM
-1

You don't understand. All the money the man makes belongs to his wife. If he spends any of that money without permission he is committing a crime, as can be seen in this banned car commercial.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:12 AM
3

I don't think they post pictures of random redditors there, unlike /r/ladyboners.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:08 AM
1

It was already submitted 9 days ago.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:08 AM
-1

I'd say feminism is androphobia, misandry and female supremacy all in one.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:07 AM
-1

Now you see why they tolerate SRS while being anti-MR? They look like typical manginas.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:03 AM
15

Don't kid yourself. This organization cares nothing about boys or girls, only about lining its own pockets.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:00 AM
-1

Because these are the reddit admins: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZoT9Tt64wg
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:57 AM
-2

No, because she is a woman and all his money belongs to her.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:10 AM
4

A US woman allegedly failed to tell her husband that she was putting their daughter up for adoption days after he moved to the other side of the country for a new job. When a woman does something bad, there's no shortage of adjectives like allegedly. When a man gets accused of rape, the word "alleged" is nowhere to be found. Tira Bland gave birth prematurely and allegedly signed the child over to a family of seven in Utah soon after her husband went to South Carolina for a new job with the US Ar…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:47 AM
5

I think I should be paid the same as CEOs. I'm being discriminated based on work experience. This has to stop.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:37 AM
6

If a woman says that she consents then changes her mind and somehow voices that concern(by actions or statement), and the man proceeds, then it is rape. The important part here is that she expressed her lack or withdrawal of consent. Earlier you stated that this was not required. BOTH partners should make sure consent is maintained. Should they ask each other every few seconds if they have consent to continuing sex? Why should the burden of proof be on the victim, and not on the accused rapist? …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:35 AM
2

well I think the state needs to be involved in that parental contract only because later she could turn to the state for child support. We're talking about how it should be, not how it is. Under the current system any such contract would be invalid.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:33 AM
1

That's the 2nd time that video is uploaded in a few days over at /r/videos. Good to see it keeps getting upvoted.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:21 AM
2

If someone does not want to have sex, and you have sex with them, that is rape. By your definition if someone says they consent and then have sex, and then report it to police saying it she did not want to have sex, it would be considered rape. Any woman could turn any man into a rapist ex post facto by having sex with them. I don't like your definition at all.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:09 AM
1

Absolutely. The contract should be between the father and the mother, no involvement from the state. If the woman gets pregnant without a contract, she could still raise the child or have a father support it if he wants to. Or she could abort or give it away for adoption. Back in the day this contract was called marriage. Now marriage mutated into something unrecognizable. Being made a parent against one's will is terrible for the children.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:03 AM
1

Compare punishment for sex crimes to those of manslaughter and murder and you will see why.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:50 AM
2

It's one of those areas of law where if a woman does it, she can get away with anything, but if a man does it, he'll get nailed in court. Like you said, they might consider it a kidnapping. If you were seriously considering it, you should talk to an actual lawyer.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:48 AM
3

It's 100% her choice. If she wants to you will be on the hook for child support for the next 18 years. As far as I know it's the same in every state. I posted here about a hypothetical way of using Safe Haven laws to get out of it, but I admit it probably has a low chance of working.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:59 AM
8

This is what feminism does. If not for feminism, how many men could've seen this movie and came forward with the abuse they were experiencing? Maybe we'd even have some domestic violence shelters for men. Fuck feminism.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:44 AM
2

So she decides in her mind whether it's rape or not? Legally consent should be based on her actions which affirm or deny consent instead of her mental state.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:29 AM
5

And the second, where does the Consitution state that the federal government can control how insurance companies set its rates? That's the question, isn't it? On what authority do they pass these laws? The Constitution doesn't say what the federal government can't do, it says what it is allowed to do. The federal government has no powers other than those granted by the Constitution. By what authority does the federal government enact Obamacare and tell private businesses what they can or cannot …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:46 AM
1

Rape culture is a term feminism stole from what goes on in prisons. It's no surprise that it fits how male sexual assault is viewed outside of prisons as well.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:18 AM
1

Marriage - It's a bad deal for men. Upon divorce he can literally lose everything -- the kids, the house, and might have to pay alimony and child support. Upon divorce both parties consider the kids to be the most important asset, which affects the woman's choice whether to divorce or not. The woman gets the kids in 87% of cases. Also, 97% of alimony is paid by men. Courts are biased against men, family courts especially. Also consider that: - The family court judge can award more in child suppo…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:05 AM
1

It has less to do with numbers and more with intellectual honesty and rigor. What I see in feminism is quite the opposite -- the existence of rape culture and patriarchy is accepted dogmatically and any and all statistics are interpreted through that lens. Other than Christina Hoff Sommers I don't know of any feminists who reject the feminist ideology -- and she was excommunicated from feminist circles long ago. So I hope it's not surprising to you that the word feminism drives most men away. If…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:18 AM
4

Fact based, not emotion based. I don't understand why you want to attract male readers. If you do change your content and style, you will lose female readers. Why not keep writing about things you are interested in, which, I assume, is the reason one keeps a blog.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:44 AM
4

Write about things men are interested in would be my advice. Less bullshit, more substance.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:16 AM
5

Some of these twitter posts get hundreds and sometimes over a thousand upvotes with hundreds of comments. They get on the front page and attract new members who don't otherwise visit /r/mensrights and trigger a lot of discussion which would not happen otherwise. This is a net benefit to the men's rights movement and should be encouraged.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:01 PM
2

She did something which was done 60 billion times before in human history. She should get a medal.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:53 PM
8

Let me ask you this: What do you think is the main purpose of this sub? Is it to attract new people to men's rights? To make men's rights "look good"? To have deep intellectual discussion on men's rights issues? Your assumption here is that circle-jerk is bad and more in-depth discussion is good. Why is one good, and the other one bad, and how does that coincide with the answer to the first question.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:47 PM
6

What disturbs me even more is the assumption that all aspects of gender roles can usefully be done away with. Or even that they should be done away with! Equality before the law? Treating everyone the same? Equal opportunities? Equal outcomes? All of which are problematic for different reasons. The only sensible way to fix the current imbalances is freedom: The government should stop picking the winners and losers and let the free market decide gender relations and gender economics. We should em…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:38 PM
-1

I wouldn't call her a lady, but yes, it's the same person.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:41 PM
1

Right, about 5-10% is where it starts being a "woman's issue".
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:36 PM
18

My question is this: What has to happen to prove to these crazy people once and for all that we no longer live in a patriarchy? It's like trying to prove to a religious fundamentalist that god doesn't exist. You can't. Their ideology starts out with the assumption of patriarchy and men as being the cause of all societal problems.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:15 PM
0

Same shit as rebecca watson, except watson didn't cash out with $250k.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:18 PM
2

The women aren't crazy. They're well paid for their performances. As to who hires them and why, that's the real question.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:15 PM
5

By the way, the "MRA/Rape apologist" they were referring to was Dr. Warren Farrell who was giving this talk. The talk was called "Boys to Men: Transforming the Boys Crisis into our Sons’ Opportunities"
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:30 AM
5

They creep on redditors over in /r/ladyboners. If sexes were reversed the sub would have been banned long ago.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:04 AM
2

How much taxpayer money did this sorry excuse for a human being waste over the past year. How many police resources did she divert with her false accusations, which possibly could have saved lives elsewhere? What was the cost of all the court hearings and police time? The damage she did could easily be a million dollars. And yet he's the one who now can't get a job.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:00 AM
32

The list prevents people from integrating back into the society. Also, it's not constitutional to punish a person after they serve their sentence and the prison sentences for sex crimes are already disproportionately higher than for anything else that we have. I oppose it on those grounds. The kinds of people that might get on the list is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:43 AM
1

Men and women differ in some key areas when it comes to thinking and acting.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:22 AM
3

I hate TyT but I can't disagree with them here.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:05 AM
2

What the fuck? Coercion means the threat of force, which is not what's happening here. I will not permit feminists to corrupt any more words than they already have. A more accurate description would be: "He was nagging me so I said yes and then I regretted it later and called it rape."
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:30 AM
18

You are fucking scum. Fucking scuuum. More lies AVFM Article
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:17 AM
10

It's satire of tumblr social justice. In fact, tumblr itself is turning into such a trollfest it's hard to know who is being serious.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:20 AM
15

While I can't tell with those people, I've long suspected that feminists, especially the more radical ones, have serious undiagnosed mental health issues possibly stemming from childhood abuse. The anti-male hatred and wilful ignorance you see in those protesters seems fairly representative of feminists online.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:08 AM
19

Somebody should do a video switching between the two for everybody to see what feminism really is. Someone did just that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7FmsNiqX2s
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:32 PM
-3

I don't see a problem. Women want to get raped to the point of having rape fantasies about it. "Sixty-two percent said they'd had at least one such fantasy." How many more were afraid of answering the question honestly?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:18 PM
6

Maybe the experts at /r/tumblrinaction could solve this mystery.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:13 PM
6

I can't tell if satire.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:09 PM
1

Make a new account.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:07 PM
63

by showing the feminists that we really aren't a hate group Feminists will keep referring to us as a hate group regardless of what we do. Having to tiptoe around hoping for feminist approval is a quick way to run the movement into the ground.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:42 PM
2

I believe men have lower tolerance for bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:14 PM
4

AVFM does a lot of activism, so you should look there. Also check out their sub at /r/mensrightsactivists (although it seems to be inactive). From what I hear there's plenty of MRAs from Ontario.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:09 PM
9

This sort of thing is invisible until you're on the short end of such discrimination. Expect a lot of responses in the form of "Well, I'm a woman and I never got any special treatment."
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:18 PM
26

NAFALT! One of the women said "I came here as part of my gender studies group" It doesn't get more mainstream than that. This is the face of feminism.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:13 PM
1

Dammit, spoilers.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:44 PM
3

It's a troll It's been reposted here countless number of times
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:41 PM
37

Indeed! I submitted it to /r/tumblrinaction thinking it would get lukewarm reception at best, but the response has been overwhelmingly positive. The rabid violence of those feminists is clear for all the world to see.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:31 PM
0

Great work from FIRE and COTWA and everyone else! They appointed a man to replace her, so hopefully we will see some sanity return to college campuses.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:02 PM
14

Well done, Andy.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:31 PM
6

Here's one where the woman gives the penis to police "as evidence". Evidence that she cut it off, I guess. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/31/bangladeshi-woman-cuts-off-rapists-penis-and-gives-it-to-police/
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:31 PM
1

This is a good reason to reinstate statute of limitations for rape, sexual assault and child abuse. Seven years ought to be plenty.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:25 PM
2

Here's the way I see it: Natural birth ratio is 1.05 males for every female. Male disposability lowers this substantially (below 1.0) - males die younger Then sex selection in countries like China raises this above 1.0 It's hard to say whether the woman in the picture has thought it through this far. Arguably she wants to eliminate sex selection in China and maybe that would get that ratio below 1.0. That also means she has no intention fighting male disposability -- I guess not unexpected for a…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:38 PM
5

You can't trick yourself into being happy -- happiness comes from working towards goals and making progress. If you try to chase happiness itself you will fail. Notice what the class focuses on: Self-Esteem and Self-Confidence - These must come from skills and experience. Faking them is ignoring reality, and won't work long term. Healthy body image - No, not heathy body, but healthy body image. Again, more fakery. Personal Action Plan - This could be anything, but I bet it focuses on achieving t…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:33 PM
2

I would say that we are experiencing the tail end of the credit expansion and unsustainable practices which started in the 50s. Of course in the 50s life was easy because they were living on money borrowed from the future. Ever since then the can has been kicked down the road, ever increasing in size, until under the weight of mathematics it's ready tocollapse.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:37 AM
2

Shockingly, alcohol may have played a role in the alleged assault. No shortage of excuses when a woman does something bad.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:46 AM
47

http://i.imgur.com/rjvL6.jpg What is she saying.. that feminism will fix that?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:44 AM
74

"I need feminism because I'm supposed to trust men yet treat them all as suspect." You're confused here. This is caused by feminism.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:06 AM
36

Yeah.. I need feminism because the sky is blue.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:04 AM
0

That's fucked up, but if you could record her reaction it would go viral in a heartbeat given the context. I see what you did there.jpg
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:03 AM
2

Great point, especially for #1 and #2. 2 - A man's goal during sex is to please the woman, and the woman's goal is to please herself. 1 - Don't expect him to be a porn star. Don't let him do all the work and don't act like a dead fish or a corpse.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 02:58 AM
20

I don't think you're missing anything. They're probably teaching anti-knowledge and anti-skills.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 02:08 AM
-7

Unfortunately this is what our society does to them.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:32 AM
1

Did you see her grinning ear to ear after her not guilty verdict was announced?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:02 AM
2

It was even banned in schools on the made up reason that it was discriminatory towards women because they couldn't participate.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:46 AM
4

Fuck feminism. Seriously. If this happened in the US it would be 98% men. It looks like Bulgaria has not been infested by the feminist disease.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:18 AM
14

You're asking us how you can reason with someone who accepts violence as a valid means of resolving an argument. Seriously?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:11 AM
3

F*ck, wish it was like this in Australia. Stupid speed cameras and sh*t get you, it doesn't matter how big your breasts are. Hahaha.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:32 PM
1

Let me ask you this: If the roles were reversed: the man had the baby and the woman did not want it and was looking at 18 years of paying child support for a child she might never see. How do you think she might go about getting the baby from the man and getting it to a safe haven? You see that the difference here isn't that the man can't, but that he isn't willing to do what is necessary and what a woman would have done without a 2nd thought had the roles been reversed.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:28 PM
5

Nice try, but I bet you never tried getting a boner while backed into a corner and fighting for your life.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:08 PM
6

lol I need feminism because I don't know how to cook. You can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:58 PM
7

We should call all violence against men gender based violence to make sure that phrase loses all meaning.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:28 PM
3

Has it always been a career choice for women, and just recently became a choice for men, too? The title might as well read Collecting Disability Payments Has Become A Career Choice For Women
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:20 PM
2

Even the boys are made to look like goofballs! Do they not run these commercials through a test audience to see if they are having the desired impact?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:08 PM
7

I see. So when Title IX says Prohibition against discrimination; exceptions. No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. It's now being interpreted not as equality of opportunity (which in itself would be problematic), but equality of outcome. And the Dear Colleague letter extends it to student conduct as we…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:01 PM
2

My guess is that is what English was suggesting with her bizarre comment, that and the fact that the "Dear Colleague" letter is ostensibly designed to prevent discrimination (it is based on a misapplication of the law, as former Department of Education attorney Hans Bader has demonstrated). I still don't get it. Discrimination of what against whom? Was there some context to the quote that might shine some light on what she meant?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:28 PM
5

The original videos from Tom Leykis show were deleted for some reason, but here's an excerpt from a forum post: So ... Tom Leykis has always advised men to put Tabasco sauce in their condoms if they're going to throw them in the garbage. For the women who try to access the contents of the condom despite its bloodlike appearance, Tabasco sauce apparently causes serious burns to labial and vaginal tissue. So, due to the screams, the man will know what the woman has done if she excuses herself to t…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:21 PM
11

Did manhood academy channel just steal this video?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:03 PM
3

You're missing my point. By calling her a victim you're already admitting defeat.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:24 PM
2

At the time the victim accuser was consensual with this.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:21 PM
2

http://forums.avoiceformen.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:01 PM
3

Check out http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/11/sexism-in-stem.html
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:51 PM
2

Yet more proof that Japanese women are more, feminine. I believe this has changed rapidly in the past decades.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:06 PM
3

Try tabasco sauce instead.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:05 PM
1

6) Position: The laboratory manager position is intentionally gendered. This job is not representative of other opportunities in the field. I have never met a female laboratory manager (20 years working in biology). Laboratory manager is as stereotypically male as daycare worker is stereotypically female. It is hard, lonely, dirty work. Recently I saw a study which shows anti-male bias in female dominated (80%+) fields. It sounds like this is a normal human bias which happens to both sexes, and …
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:45 PM
7

Why do we need to refute it? It sounds like these professors rated male students as more competent because they actually are. In STEM fields women receive special treatment and get pushed through to graduation when they should be failing. This study shows sexism, but against men, not against women.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:18 PM
9

We don't need to convert these people, only everyone else who isn't brainwashed by a new incarnation of Marxism called Feminism.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:13 PM
3

But this is illegal. Following Safe Haven laws and dropping the baby off at a designated location shields you from prosecution.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:00 PM
7

Yep, it would be difficult for the father, no doubt about it, but it's a way to both protest the law which is highly unfair to fathers, a way to raise awareness of lack of father's rights and to attempt to do legal paternal surrender, which I believe the father should have a right to do. Most likely the mother would be able to adopt her own child even if the process gets that far, and if she takes the father to court I bet the court will award child support as well, regardless of any laws to the…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:07 AM
4

One of the legal principles our legal system operates on is that the person committing a crime cannot profit from it. If I stole 2 billion dollars and was convicted of theft for it, I would be made to give it all back in addition to any fine or other damages I would have to pay. But that's exactly what the woman does -- she profits from the crime not only by getting and raising the child that she wanted, but by collecting child support as well.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:01 AM
-10

"women are incapable of integrity..." While NAWALT applies, studies show that men and women treat ethics differently. Men tend to apply ethics universally while women's view on what is ethical and what isn't changes based on their relationship to the target. Women are more likely to use pack or tribal ethics and this can be seen in feminism as well -- they see anyone in their "in" group is right, and everyone else as wrong.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:57 AM
9

If the mother can do it, then the father can do it as well.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:49 AM
1

It creates more dependents for the social programs of the state, increasing the size and power of the state.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:22 AM
4

How many men is one woman's life worth? How many men should die to save one woman? 1? 1.5? 3? 10? Once you come up with an answer, or at least a rough estimate, then you will have the answer to whether "women and children first" is a good idea.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:30 PM
1

She jumped the shark when she feigned suicide. Enough beating this dead horse.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:27 PM
20

This is intentional sexual assault and should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:25 PM
19

Very good point. It's not culturally acceptable for men to have mental health issues, so they resort to street drugs for self-medication, and then we throw them in jail for it. Fucking shit this is depressing.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:58 PM
2

While far more boys than girls take ADHD medications, a higher number of women than men are utilizing them as adults. I wonder if mothers are responsible for this. That is, it's a form of projection.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:57 PM
0

What they don't say is if that money was left in the economy instead of being extracted by taxes, it would produce even more GDP growth. Central planning and government spending is misallocation of capital by definition.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:54 PM
7

Cracked articles usually jump on the anti-male bandwagon. I used to have a pretty high opinion of cracked until seeing just how misandric some of their articles are. Can you imagine them writing an article called "5 Things Women Do To Ruin Their Own Sex Lives"? Neither can I. It's fine to bash men, but you can never criticize women.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:57 AM
1

When he asked "why would a father kill his kids" the only thing I could say was "a woman is somehow involved." He does a much more thorough job answering that.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:48 AM
2

Well, most of SRS are privileged white male college students who never had to work a day in their life.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:31 AM
1

I do think about it, and I'm saying you're wrong. Sex from a female is valued much higher than sex from a male. There are many prostitutes and they get paid good money. There are very few male prostitutes. When a man and a woman have sex, she is literally giving something away. Usually there is some transfer of wealth from the male to the female in exchange for it, such as protection, provision, or a future promise of those things.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:25 AM
-1

Are you seriously saying that the language I use causes male disposability and a host of other problems for males? I call a spade a spade. If she's giving it away for free, she's selling herself short, unless she's some disease ridden hoe. Your emotional arguments are pathetic.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:13 AM
4

Correlation. Causation. Learn the difference. You need to learn english. This has nothing to do with anything I wrote.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:05 AM
1

It's called supply and demand. When the dick market is flooded, it's hard to sell it. On the other hand, women keep the pussy price up, so yeah, giving it away for free is noteworthy.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:47 PM
1

You do realize that it's the gangs causing the problems not the people wearing those colors? Of course for a public school it's easier to blame the victim and ban the colors rather than deal with the underlying problem.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:43 PM
0

Be there or be a Shrodinger's Rapist.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:19 PM
1

They're getting paid good money for it -- it's a career choice like any other. On the other hand, if they were giving it away for free, that could have a correlation with childhood abuse. Edit: Oh, downvotes? Is it so hard to accept reality? Sexual abuse of females during childhood was a strong predictor for promiscuity and prostitution. This isn't even controvertial.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:52 PM
1

Loved the video. Not sure why it's being downvoted. Kids are very good at applying universal moral principles. It's part of how the brain learns. In fact, it's more difficult to apply moral principles selectively because that requires more rules, and thus takes longer to learn. She sees the contradiction in boys tons being packaged in blue and girl's toys in pink and calls bullshit on it.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:39 PM
4

Wrong. They listed /r/mensrights under "misogyny". Misogyny is the hatred of women, which implies we are a hate group. Also they say we are against women's programs. Here's the full quote: Reddit: Mens Rights A “subreddit” of the user-generated news site Reddit, this forum describes itself as a “place for people who feel that men are currently being disadvantaged by society.” While it presents itself as a home for men seeking equality, it is notable for the anger it shows toward any program desi…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:35 PM
6

It's SPLC, a group of bigots who profit off their moral crusadering. If they're talking about us, we must be doing something right. I think the reason you're being downvoted: Everyone knows this No one cares what SPLC thinks of us Yes SRS is a hate group You can't reason with either the SPLC or SRS because both profit from mis-characterization of men's rights. SPLC profits financially, while SRS is rewarded in other ways.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:32 PM
0

You wear clothes which draw attention to you and then tell me you don't want attention? It's like when a woman sprouts a huge cleavage and then derides men who happen to glance at it. Hypocrisy at its finest.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:27 PM
20

http://i.imgur.com/zxIPn.png Does this look like someone who is too drunk to consent? Proper grammar, punctuation, spelling and capitalization. And if the guy drank too, as his earlier texts indicated, shouldn't she be getting expelled too for having sex with someone who was too intoxicated to consent?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:25 PM
1

If you're paying a Nigerian nurse £100 to do a home circumcision with scissors, forceps and olive oil, you're gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:07 PM
0

Oh please, if you think your choice of clothes, makeup, lipstick and high heel shoes has nothing to do with how you want others to perceive you, you're thoroughly deluding yourself. It is the only reason you do those things. Sometimes I'm astounded at the ability women have to deceive themselves.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:57 PM
3

Liar.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:43 PM
1

If they can't deny insurance based on a pre-existing condition, I can refrain from getting it until I get sick, and then get the insurance only for as long as I need it. People will be doing this more and more as they figure out how the system works. This raises premiums for everyone else. Also they must insure people with expensive and incurable cancers. These people could easily run up hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills merely to extend their life a little. I think the costs wil…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:04 PM
2

I use it in a well defined sense. We get a few posts a week saying something like: You should/shouldn't do X if you want the MRM to be taken seriously You're making the MRM look bad I call them concern trolls because that's what they are.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:59 PM
-1

I know what a slut looks like, but how does a faggot dress? That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:55 PM
1

That was so awesome I'm watching it again.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:05 AM
2

What's wrong with Russia? I tried reading a few articles on the discrepancy but they blame it on booze. I see alcohol as a symptom, not the cause of the discrepancy. You don't drink and commit suicide at such rates because of a good life. Anyone here from Russia or lived there recently?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:52 AM
3

If you believe their sidebar you will also believe it when it says MRAs use tactics such as harassment, intimidation and violence.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:41 AM
1

I thought slut is a word of empowerment now, with slutwalks and all. I guess my tiny male brain can't comprehend the rich nuances of these feminine concepts.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:38 AM
-1

Love and lust is nature's way of getting us to reproduce. If it wasn't for those two, sex would be gross (eww bodily fluids) and we'd never trust women. Oh and human race would die out.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:35 AM
42

The ad got pulled. I'll just quote the top youtube comment: an ad with women getting mad pulled because women got mad.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:56 AM
3

Does it matter that the intent is sarcastic if the people reading those posters don't know that? For all intents and purposes it's not sarcasm and I won't treat it as such.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:19 AM
5

I have no problem with the joke itself. At the same time I will point out the hypocrisy of RW using it. The joke itself is harmless. The context is what's important here.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:12 AM
0

I reworded the last one. Is that better?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:00 AM
-1

Punish? Hardly. It's called treating them like they want to be treated. People wear clothes to project a certain image. If they wear the clothes of a slut, they choose to project the image of a slut.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:40 AM
-2

We need to do better. Come on, brainstorm! "If you can consent to drive, you can consent to sex." "Regret sex is not rape." "If you dress like a slut don't be surprised when you are treated like one."
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:35 AM
-1

Please post it in againstmensrights. The field of Gynomatics is in its infancy and can use as much exposure as it can get. Every little bit helps, even the two or three people who browse that subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:29 AM
10

Great poster. Are those urinals or drinking fountains?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:25 AM
0

Why not? If a couple agrees that in the case a child is conceived to give it up for adoption or to have an abortion, and later changes her mind, she can keep the child and force the unwilling father to pay child support for 18 years. It would only be fair if the father gets his biological child in this case, and the woman gets to pay child support for 18 years without a right to see the child. It's called equality.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:20 AM
-1

They chose a woman biologically unrelated to the child over the child's biological father.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:14 AM
-6

Pay attention! The precedent in courts is that the woman gets the child no matter what. The courts must follow the precedent.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:10 AM
-5

Women are interesting creatures who baffle scientists to this day. Just like matter which possesses gravitational, electric and magnetic fields, women possess two additional fields: Ownership Distortion Field and Responsibility Abdication Field. Scientists study these fields and their effects in a branch of sciences known as Gynomatics, which is still in its infancy. Anything in proximity to a woman becomes hers, including people if the object remains within her presence long enough. Thus a chil…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:05 AM
6

Such rules would be acceptable in a private school because attending them is entirely voluntary. The state school you have no choice but to pay for, and it seems there's little or no say in how they are run either. If state schools were a business they would go bankrupt because of their insane costs and poor quality of education (if it can be called that).
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:13 AM
1

Men make more than women. It's a fact. When a man and a woman are married and live together, do they split it, or does one person pay the rent? Usually it's the man. When it comes time to buy a car, I often see the man buying a car for the woman. I've never seen it the other way around. In addition to that, studies show that women control 80% of household discretionary spending. When a woman divorces a man, she gets half of his stuff. There are massive wealth transfers in a marriage. Just becaus…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:42 AM
1

I'm not surprised. Cops rarely arrest women even if there's clear evidence of a crime. By the way, we exchange money for sex all the time. It's called a marriage. Having marriage legal and prostitution not is sheer hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:32 AM
9

Law School. These are our future public defenders who will be defending men in court.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:22 AM
10

The school is there to teach. On what authority are they dictating the student's appearance?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:17 AM
1

Right. It's a combination of three things (at least) that I can think of, in decreasing order of importance: Can't "discriminate" against preexisting condition Forcing men to pay the same amount as women Forcing insurance companies to cover things the OP mentioned which only benefit women and which insurance companies otherwise wouldn't even cover. Note that this means for young people like myself health insurance will be very expensive. Also companies which employ a lot of young people will hav…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:47 PM
3

Debating who has it worse in no way implies that men's and women's rights are a zero sum game, and furthermore I haven't seen anyone here try to claim that it is. Granted, it's not a useful argument to have because neither side can win it because of the subjective nature of personal experience. it damages the reputation of a young movement and creates discontent in would-be sympathizers where before there was none. This is called concern trolling. To be blunt, it's people like you who try to tel…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:35 PM
8

Finally a woman speaks out against all this bullshit. If there is any sexism in the game industry it's heavily in favor of women.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:55 PM
1

Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:52 PM
9

They're a hate group. They're against "men's rights", as in they don't want men to have any rights. What did you expect would happen when you posted there? To any MRA thinking of posting there, don't. They'll just ban you. Don't give them the satisfaction.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:28 PM
1

Don't insurance companies have to disregard preexisting conditions now? That's the reason for the premium hike. When the government comes in to make something "affordable," it inevitably does the opposite. Affordable housing act? Affordable education? lol affordable health care.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:08 PM
4

It's time to take a page out of the leftist book and start calling anyone who thinks race is a social construct a "racist" and a "race denier".
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:59 PM
3

As an example, Judge Boshier talks about a case he presided over involving a 14-year-old Napier boy. His parents had separated and he had a good relationship with his father, until his mother made sexual abuse allegations. After the father was found not guilty, the custody issue arrived in the Family Court, where Judge Boshier discovered the mother had turned the boy against his father and was sabotaging any attempts to come to a compromise. "I had to decide if I would force the boy to see the f…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:50 PM
12

Ah, the government loves going after domestic violence. No one really knows what's going on inside a home. Most are he-said she-said cases. Regardless of who they arrest, it's impossible to prove the police did anything wrong. Excuse for police and the government to increase its power, leading up to the holy grail of them being able to monitor what goes on inside your home. Great way to break up families, which strengthens the government and increases wealth transfer from men to women. Also crea…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:03 PM
8

Feminists love knocking strawmen down. And a comic is the perfect medium for that.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:14 PM
22

Hence goes the saying, "absolute power corrupts absolutely." With absolute authority like the state, the school, or even parents of a child, they do not have to abide by consistent moral principles. They "know" from the gut who is right and who is wrong. And after identifying the culprit they let a very ingenious part of the brain responsible for post hoc rationalization take over. Instead of evaluating the data and forming a theory, they have a theory and shoehorn the data. As the saying goes, …
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:00 PM
12

Sounds like what we have here in the united states, only they're more honest about it.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:18 PM
173

What the fuck, they banned students from wearing drag after this incident. Imagine if the university banned makeup, high heels, or lipstick after a woman got raped. This is just too much.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:52 PM
0

They don't want a classless society, they want a totalitarian one with them at the top. If those people ever get what they want, it will be a dictatorship a thousand times worse than what you see in /r/communism and /r/anarchism.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:33 PM
1

Feminists are angry because the woman has been “fooled” into having sex with a less than ideal mate in terms of value. The male appears to be of higher value than he really is because he has learned the elements of attraction. Ah, that explains why feminists, women, and society in general have such disdain for PUAs. PUA is doing nothing more than fooling the woman into thinking his SMV is higher than it really is. It is the male equivalent of lipstick, hair dyes, makeup, high heels and boob jobs…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:04 PM
2

Unless he's married. Or there's kids. Or a woman is involved in any way -- then all bets are off.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:57 AM
2

Yeah, by far the worst default sub of them all.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:08 AM
3

Just when you think the court system can't get any more ridiculous...
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:06 AM
10

Wow, they're getting desperate. Laugh. It's funny.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:02 AM
-1

Yep, it is the same, and I wouldn't have a problem with that either.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:59 AM
1

If they are not allowed to say female only in their advertisement they will simply reject male applicants later in the process. This is a bad idea and wastes everyone's time. I believe in freedom of association and the landlord can rent out their property to whoever they choose.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:46 AM
2

The difference in all of those cases is how she feels about it. Reality is what she thinks it is.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:37 AM
3

Don't want her running away too far.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:35 AM
2

Have you considered how the absence of a father figure in the home will affect your child? Also you cannot sign away your right to child support. That's not a valid contract.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:17 AM
4

It's Ten O'Clock, Do You Know Where Your Sperm Are? Absurdities in American Law Office of Child Support Enforcement – 70% of Debt Owed by Those Earning Under $10k Court Rules Boy Must Pay Child Support to His Rapist Injustice by Default Unable to pay child support, poor parents land behind bars
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:07 AM
5

Here's how it should have gone: Her (paraphrased): You'll never get married if you keep acting that way! You: That's the plan!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:08 AM
0

Does Ginkgo post on reddit?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:00 AM
3

Yep, they're the batshit insane SRS types who think /r/feminism is run by MRAs.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:33 PM
6

Why? They're scared shitless so they resort to libel. I'm disappointed that I made the list only twice.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:52 PM
29

Why worry? If it happens, it will be good for us. It'll drive more people here. The truth has a way of being heard, even if it takes time. What you call a shitstorm, I call opportunity.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:26 PM
2

If you decide to check it out, don't bother posting. They'll just delete your comment and ban you. Don't give them the satisfaction.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:19 PM
13

Great work. I especially like the deniers who are trying to say he is wrong but have no arguments or data to back it up.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:40 PM
-1

I didn't realize 4chan was so anti feminist. Anon makes a strong ally.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:43 PM
2

The thing is, it's feminism that says women are stupid, weak, incapable, monolithic and unchanging. It's feminism that says women have no control over their lives and can't take responsibility for their actions. It's feminism that says women can only be attracted by certain qualities, can only have particular kinds of responses, can only experience the world in narrow ways. Men's rights holds that women are capable of more -- are more than that.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:04 PM
2

You're like the 10th person to post this piece of garbage.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:57 PM
3

Get rid of social security Get rid of welfare Get rid of forced child support And you'll see society improve. Until then, things will be going down the shitter.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:13 PM
-4

If that means I accept biological truths and you reject them regardless of evidence, then yes.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:03 AM
-4

I let feminists like you do it for me.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:48 AM
-17

We want women to shave. That is all.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:16 AM
0

Incontrovertible proof that /r/feminism is run by MRAs. /s
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:08 AM
5

I think part of the problem is kids are not being taught critical thinking skills which makes them susceptible to religion of god, religion of feminism and religion of environmentalism. When feminists say something like "We want equality. We want more women in the government." they shouldn't be thinking "yeah.. I guess equality is good, so we want more women in the government." They should be asking "why would that be a good thing?" Of course, teaching kids critical thinking in public schools wo…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:05 AM
19

He's the average redditor. He's way too low on the hipster scale as far as the average vice writer goes.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:16 AM
1

I'm glad Stardusk is covering this topic. It's essential for understanding women, yet so few people talk about it within the manosphere.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:49 AM
4

http://www.vice.com/read/atheism-sexismatheism-00003000-v19n10 Here it is in case anyone was looking for it.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:22 AM
-6

It's evidence of their nature. In science you cannot prove anything with absolute certainty, only gather increasing evidence to support your case.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:09 AM
5

"The results of the new experiment revealed that participants obeyed at the same rate that they did when Milgram conducted his original study more than 40 years ago." Nothing has changed since the original experiment.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:07 AM
9

Milgram's experiment is a test of obedience. One of the most disturbing (and unexpected!) experiments. Check out the wikipedia article for an explanation.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:48 AM
0

I do not find aggressive women attractive. Neither do most men.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:34 AM
61

Quick, submit his article to SRS, citing his misogynist use of the word 'pussy'.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:32 AM
8

That's strange. I've never heard of sexual assault against women being defended. In fact, society considers it the most vile crime, only 2nd to murder. How can you say there is rape culture? Objectification - "removal of an individual's humanity" is clear as mud.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:27 AM
7

You use a lot of feminist language -- "objectification", "rape culture." While these concepts might have rigorous definitions somewhere in academia, due to high incidence of equivocation on the internet those words are meaningless. You'll have to say what you mean without using those words if you want anyone to understand what you are saying.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:12 AM
3

Check out the intimate partner and sexual violence survey: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf They try to hide the numbers by shuffling them into different categories, but if you decipher them you'll see: Women raped in last 12 months: 1,270,000 Men "made to penetrate" in the last 12 months: 1,267,000 Almost the same! These are found on pages 18 and 19.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:00 AM
48

Yep, projection: Like a lot of Reddit, the Men’s Rights forum is a way for predominantly white, predominantly rich young men to pat themselves on the back for how smart they are. Well, 1 out of 3 ain't bad. He got the "predominantly white" part right.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:48 PM
0

If you're wondering about the downvotes, you forgot to include the link and there's another submission with the link already.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:39 PM
8

Keep reading and watching youtube videos. Check out the documentaries of Manwomanmyth. There's over 16 hours of them. He covers all the basics of men's issues. Suicide rates - Men kill themselves at three to four times the rate of women. Domestic violence - Mostly a 50/50 issue in mutually abusive relationships. For relationships with one sided violence, up to 70% of abusers are women. Date rape - I'm not sure what you're asking here.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:33 PM
1

As with most personality traits, it's likely part genetic and part environmental.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:27 PM
71

Vice did some really good documentaries. For example here's one about General Butt Naked. I think anything with Shane Smith is good, but Vice is so big now they put out a lot of crap. Like you say, even if we're being mocked, the article is helping drive people our way. As the saying goes, in a fight between truth and falsehood, only falsehood has anything to fear.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:23 PM
1

Who is downvoting you? Here's the source: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~baumeistertice/goodaboutmen.htm
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:17 PM
-16

I know someone will ask, "How is this related to men's rights?" Understanding women's nature is essential to our fight for men's rights. And that nature is extreme obedience to authority.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:10 PM
1

Like I said, I'm not sure on that part, but I do know they get money from the federal government for every dollar of child support they collect. See incentive payments under Title IV-D.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:35 PM
2

Unfortunately, Venker is somewhat enigmatic about how to reverse this problem, beyond a few vague clues. Women, she says, “have the power to turn everything around” (Duh, of course, we have ALL the power). “All they have to do is surrender to their nature – their femininity – and let men surrender to theirs.” Surrender to my femininity. Surrender to my femininity. I get the general idea but what does it mean, like, in practice? Not wear pants so much? Let my hair grow. Ask my boss to pay me a li…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:36 PM
1

To play devils advocate, is this a gender based rule, or does it only specify child support debt? I don't understand what you're asking here. Also, if you're renewing a passport isn't it about $150, money that could maybe go towards owed child support instead? I don't think it costs anything to renew. Even the pictures don't have to be professionally done any more. Not sure how much it costs to get the passport though. Essentially you're told you may not legally leave the country until you pay o…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:30 PM
9

Haha, nice novelty account.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:48 PM
10

It's easy to say "man up and pay the child support" but the reality isn't that simple. What if the father did not want the child? 30-40% of pregnancies are unwanted. What if the father is allowed to see his child only a few hours a week? What if the pregnancy happened outside of marriage and he has no visitation rights at all, and yet is expected to pay child support? In a divorce the mother gets custody of the kids 84% of the time. All she has to do is take out a bogus restraining order and the…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:26 PM
4

Each of the 50 states gets funding from the federal government based on how well they enforce child support payments, and I believe they also get a cut of all child support payments they collect. So every state would favor a law like this which in some sense forbids those who are behind on child support from leaving the country, without explicitly forbidding it. They don't want "their" slaves from running off to another country where they are untouchable.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:58 PM
-2

Almost all of which are in the 30-40 range, which is fertile.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:15 PM
4

How do you know he walked out? Whenever I hear this "father walked out on his wife and kids" there's always more to it.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:11 PM
7

VAWA No-fault divorce False accusation shield laws Title IV-D (incentivizes corruption in the family courts) The feminists were behind every sexist piece of legislature
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:13 PM
2

Maybe we can picket hospitals where circumcision is being done. Maybe we would even get on the news.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:49 PM
30

Are you sure? If you've been listening to the fempire you should know that we keep our women pregnant, barefoot and in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:47 PM
10

I'm so sorry. Those who haven't experienced sexual abuse like to ignore it and pretend it doesn't happen. Where is your dad in all this?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:40 PM
-8

Yes, unfortunately feminists took over the leadership of OWS and turned it into some kind of a marxist movement.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:19 PM
2

Deceptive title. The sexes are switched in the story.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:53 AM
6

He points out that the reasons why some women become recalcitrant sex offenders is incompletely understood, but he feels that it may result from a combination of hyper sexuality, associations with early sexual experiences, and imitation of abuse perpetrated on them. Ah yes, there's no shortage of excuses when a woman commits a crime. Can you imagine this paragraph describing a male rapist? I can't.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:50 AM
-7

I'm tired of hearing this "rape is about power" nonsense. Rape is about sex. Rapists go after those of fertile age. They don't target grandmothers.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:45 AM
1

While you're still in college, figure out which jobs allow you to work remotely, whether it is from Europe or Asia or America. Then check out some other countries. Not everywhere is as bad as in Canada/US/UK/Australia. There are still countries out there where the government hasn't tried to break up the family unit.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:40 AM
-7

Is that the message they want to be sending? That rape can strike at any time, and at any place and there's nothing they can do to prevent it or protect themselves? If I was a woman who grew up in such an environment which made me out to be a victim of everything around me, I would be afraid of going outside.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:33 AM
3

Are they citing their sources from multiple scholarly publications too?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:19 AM
3

In that order?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:18 AM
5

DNA shows that 40% of males fail to reproduce. For a long time in history reproduction for males was the exception, not the norm. Though it is sad to break the chain of successful reproduction going back 3.5 billion years into the past.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:17 AM
7

Hmm. Scene 1 - Scary movie. Cool dad. Dad score +1. Scene 2 - Black diamond skiing. Cool dad. Dad score +1. Scene 3 - Toilet papering a tree? Vandal dad. Wtf? Dad score -1. Scene 4 - Eating in car. Cool dad. Dad score +1. Scene 5 - Concert? Cool dad. Dad score +1. Scene 6 - Tent on fire. Bumbling dad. Dad score -1. Scene 7 - Bike accident. Bumbling dad. Dad score -1. Scene 8 - Parathingy. Cool mom. Dad score -1. Overall: +4 - 4 = 0. Pretty positive toward the dad and the mom. Also, the commercia…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:07 AM
1

TL;DR: In Monaco, citizens aren't taxed on their incomes. However, there is a 19.6% “value-added tax” placed on most consumer purchases. That's awesome. The progressive tax system is unfair to the rich.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:59 AM
-7

Yes. Few years ago the young men had the occupy movement. Young women now have slutwalk. It's not clear why they are upset or what they want, but they want everyone to know it.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:55 AM
35

Here, I fixed your jpeg compression artifacts. They were painful to look at.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:46 AM
5

Well, they did have "don't tell dad" at the end. I see nothing even remotely wrong here.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:29 AM
2

I can't take Alex Jones seriously. He has way too much kooky conspiracy theory crap on his show, which makes me question how reliable the rest of what he says is.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:47 AM
-1

Why rely on a coinflip when you have a better chance of making the right decision with statistics?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:28 PM
1

Female torso is shaped more like an hourglass with large hips. Male torso is shaped like the stick figure.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:48 PM
-4

The whole point of my example is to simplify such a scenario. You could go through the interview process and still not be sure which is the best candidate.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:42 PM
1

Because it's shaped like a male. You can't tell me it looks feminine. Well you could, but I wouldn't believe you. The implication here is that it's an angry ex-wife skewering the ex-husband with knives.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:40 PM
1

Male stick figure.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:20 PM
-2

What I'm getting at is that anti-discrimination laws do more harm than good. When you try to legislate equality, the 'cure' becomes worse than the 'crime'. The government cannot make people more 'equal'. People in this subreddit tout equality as if it's something desirable, nor do they ever define what they mean by it. Also, discrimination is an ill-defined term, usually used as a pejorative. It's best to avoid its use altogether and say what we mean instead. Let's look at the store owner. He wa…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:19 PM
-4

You can substitute race for sex and it doesn't change my argument in the slightest. Let's say I'm hiring a clerk for my jewelry store. I have to choose between two candidates, who seem equally qualified: A black man and a white man. I also know that statistically black men are more likely to steal and commit crimes. If I were forced to ignore the statistical fact because of anti-discrimination laws, I would be discriminating against the white man. Anti-discrimination laws lead to discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:21 PM
-3

If I ignore their sex and flip a coin, I'm discriminating against the man who is following gender norms.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:07 PM
-1

Women suck at negotiating. doesn't help your case. It's a generalization. Did I say all? I did not. Yet what you 'refuted' assumed I did. That's called a strawman. Also, I'd really like you to explain this sentence as it currently makes no sense to me. Wouldn't we be discriminating against men if we forced the employer to consider only the qualifications and forbid discrimination based on sex? Again, if two candidates seem equally qualified, but according to statistics men tend to be better at t…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:59 PM
-3

Let's say I have two candidates, a man and a woman, for a job which requires aggressiveness, assertiveness and negotiation skills. As far as I can tell their qualifications are the same. I also know that statistically men tend to be better at the job. What should I do? Should I hire the man because I know he's statistically more likely to perform better. Or should I flip a coin, because by picking the man I would be discriminating based on sex?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:43 PM
-1

If you ignore women based on their possession of a vagina and assume that they are therefor timid and can't do the job you are being sexist. I'm making a large commitment by hiring a person. Why should it not be up to me who I choose to hire? However if you choose a man over a women because he is more aggressive and suits the job better, fantastic, you made a good decision for the company. What if I don't know who is better. What if two candidates -- a man and a woman -- have the same qualificat…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:38 PM
-1

Discrimination is choosing one thing over another. That's all it means -- choice. Have you ever heard the phrase, "There goes a discriminating young man"? It used to be a positive trait, until the left hijacked the word and corrupted it beyond all recognition.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:30 PM
-3

You can differentiate because of behaviour or personality, but making anything in one way for all men and another for all women is discriminatory towards those that don't follow the gender norms in that area. So discrimination is unavoidable. Either you discriminate towards those who do follow the gender norms, or you discriminate towards those who do not.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:01 PM
-8

If a job requires that trait -- aggressiveness -- shouldn't the employer be able to discriminate against women who tend to be more timid? What about jobs where negotiation is paramount where our testosterone plays an important role? Women suck at negotiating. Wouldn't we be discriminating against men if we forced the employer to consider only the qualifications and forbid discrimination based on sex?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:37 PM
-3

Men and women are biologically different, with different needs and wants. Considering that, isn't equality unfair? How do you define equality? It's an evasive word which seems to be defined differently for every person.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:03 PM
1

Is it because men are more likely to work within long term cancer/respitory risky areas that causes them to die sooner, or is the life expectancy of those that reach 65 fairly equal? I think I made a post about life expectancy elsewhere in the thread. I concluded that at most 1-2 years can be attributed to genetics, the rest to environment. In people 65+ suicide plays a big role. Roughly, 65+ men have five times the chance of suicide than women. 85+ is something like 10:1. Many of them kill them…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:56 PM
2

You can't fight evil directly because it disguises itself as good, and the people defend it, thinking they're on the side of good. The only way to fight it is to expose it for what it is. Only then it loses its power.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:53 PM
0

Marriage is when a guy and a girl... engage in life-long prostitution That's exactly the nature of marriage. The woman gives access to her body in exchange for protection and provision. Love and partnership is a modern invention. The government took over the role of protection. By that I assume you mean the police. By that, I assume you mean that "Traditional marriage" refers to about 3,000 years ago. Not quite. By traditional I mean as recent as a hundred years ago. Rape is where someone loses …
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:47 PM
2

Looks like a man to me.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:22 PM
-1

Why? Traditionally marriage is an exchange of goods and services. Woman gives man access to her vagina and uterus, and the man gives her protection and provision. But now the government took over the role of protection, and is taking money by force from men and giving it to women. Women are getting their side of the bargain, but we're not getting ours. You don't even have to be married to be paying for the bastard children of other men. If that's not rape, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:12 PM
3

I think you'll like this article by Paul Elam on Jury Nullification: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/on-jury-nullification-and-rape/
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:40 PM
13

Same experience here a few months back. What the fuck is wrong with those people? Are they mentally ill?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:45 AM
1

Another one "unsubscribing" without a single prior post. Unless I missed a few, that makes it three posts like this in a week or so. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:10 AM
3

My bad, as a male I guess I just don't have "women's ways of knowing". wymyn's
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:51 AM
18

"No, check your privilege. I belong to the smallest minority of all: the individual."
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:05 AM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72AoIQnCfFQ
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:33 AM
2

I take it you never tried to defend your MRA position against a woman.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:20 AM
5

Yeah.. they've run out of things to blame on men, so they go after Santa Claus.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:44 AM
11

Roughly 50% of your audience will be male. Logic does work on them. And trust me, it doesn't take much to convince people they're being shafted by society.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:40 AM
20

Ask yourself who you are trying to convince: The woman you're debating or the audience? Once the woman starts using shaming language, "how dare you say that", and implying that you have a small penis and live in your mother's basement, they're a lost cause. Yes, that means 95% (I'm being generous here) of women you argue with will be a lost cause. Back up your statements, point out their fallacies, inconsistencies and shaming language and you will win the debate. In any debate the most consisten…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:27 AM
9

That's what religious people claim. They say that porn, video games, addiction, etc ruins marriages, but they have their cause and effect backwards.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:21 AM
6

Courts get paid based on the percentage of cases in which they award child support, and the amount of child support awarded. Also feminist groups like NOW have (hundreds?) of millions of dollars they can use to lobby against your idea. How do you fight that? The system doesn't care that your way is more fair. Their way makes them more money.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:14 AM
2

I'm just going to downvote all their links from now on. Every single video they do irks me to no end.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 11:46 PM
2

They're a hate sub. We don't link to them.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 11:42 PM
3

Questions about vasectomy: Do you turn away young people who don't have kids? What if they're married -- does the wife have to agree?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 11:39 PM
-14

Can you really blame the guy? Yes, the guy must have done something wrong but the circumstances somehow exonerate him.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:15 PM
29

If that was the case I would have no problem with the current state of marriage. But marriage today is a government institution and a one-sided contract (If it were a normal contract no court would enforce it). The woman can exit the contract at any time and get all the goodies because of our biased courts and laws.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:15 PM
35

When you ask a 9 year old what he wants to be, he'll say something like "fighter pilot" or "astronaut". Ask him again when he's 18 and he'll tell you something more down to earth: engineer, lawyer, doctor. Deep down he still wants to be a fighter pilot or an astronaut, but he knows those are not realistic goals. It's a mental defense. He deceives himself by telling himself that it was just a foolish childhood dream; that he never really wanted to be an astronaut or a fighter pilot. It's too pain…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:03 PM
5

I think we need a sub ridiculing social justice. Like /r/TumblrInAction (I think MRAs will like this one) except not limited to Tumblr.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:49 AM
1

Yeah, so basically it's all down to massive underreporting/overreporting, and the data is completely useless? Right. Which is bizarre, because people don't have an incentive to lie on an anonymous survey. A certain amount of underreporting/overreporting is expected, but this much?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:58 AM
1

I don't think it's that simple. If you look at Tables 3 and 4 in the pdf, the distributions for number of lifetime partners is similar for men and women for low N, slightly higher for men at medium N, and a lot higher for men at high N.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:29 AM
2

I like Peter Schiff but what does he have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:06 AM
2

Unfortunately I don't. Either I remembered incorrectly or can't find the source. See my other post with the CDC numbers and a link.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:39 AM
5

I know what it means in general, but what does "inconclusive" mean in this particular case? Why can't they report the percentage of participants who responded to questions about fat men in a biased way? They had no trouble saying that only 0.5% of females were biased against other women. And if they couldn't detect a bias, why not say that? There must be more to it -- that is, something which made their error bars huge. My gut feeling is they botched the questions.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:33 AM
7

Not sure who downvoted you already. It's of course an excellent point and a well known paradox. Shouldn't the two numbers be roughly the same? Here are the numbers from CDC: Median number of female sexual partners in lifetime, for men 25-44 years of age, 2006-20081: 6.1 Median number of male sexual partners in lifetime, for women 25-44 years of age, 2006-20081: 3.6 Like you say, men tend to overreport and women underreport, even in anonymous surveys. Here's the data if anyone else cares to take …
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:28 AM
8

Check out the full article at http://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/pm/articles/2012/10/bias-in-the-workplace.htm with all the stats. Then, for reasons uknown (I'm guessing a deliberate attempt to play up women), they, apparently, did not ask about overweight men. They did ask, but: Readers displayed bias concerning female weight – but overwhelmingly showed prejudice towards overweight women (51%) as opposed to slimmer women (4%). The data was inconclusive about overweight men, although previous res…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:04 AM
7

Excellent post, PPM. The strength of men’s prejudice against other men was surprising, with 15.6 per cent of men showing an anti-male bias compared to just 0.5 per cent of women showing an anti-female stance. Although not as biased against men as HR women, it's still a good idea to keep your guard up around HR men. These are the typical manginas who believe that the average man is sexist, misogynist and oppressive towards women and see themselves as more enlightened because they're on the women'…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:54 AM
13

What are the changes that you're seeing?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:45 AM
5

By that logic aren't we all objectified, everywhere? "They just want us for what we can do for them, not for our personality." By stores? "They just want us for our money." Relationships? "They just want us to make them feel good." Is it a useful concept? If we lived in a perfect world, I would agree with you. But I would not feel comfortable with making such a comment with the porn industry as a whole. To say that every one who participates within pornography is doing it of there own free accor…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:44 AM
24

The reality is the opposite. Women have something like twice as many partners as men.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:22 AM
10

You're thinking too much into it. It's simply reinforcing the stereotype. Here's where it was originally posted: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattmonath/3065570042/ Unsurprisingly the female posters love the narrative that women are angels.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:22 AM
11

Let's suppose you're right. Let's assume that the concept of "objectification" has some merit and isn't simply a label used to vilify something one finds objectionable. So what? Both the woman and the man want to be objectified. They're being paid to be objectified. If they didn't want to do it, they wouldn't be doing it.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:09 AM
21

I was surprised to hear him called a psychopath. Do we consider psychopathy to be such a normal female trait that we don't even bat an eye when a woman acts like one?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:59 AM
1

I hope you don't mean to imply that the "Big Business" charities we have right now have anything to do with the free market. Most people give donations for tax deduction purposes. They're indirectly sponsored by the state. I imagine free market charities will have little resemblance to the ones we see today.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:39 AM
22

Did she just complain that in a James Bond movie the non-James Bond characters are secondary and "aren't sort of equal to him"? I think she did.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:25 AM
2

Right. We need to stop rewarding behaviors which are destructive to society. Are women hypergamous? Or aren't they? Regardless of the answer, if we incentivise divorce, we'll get more of it.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:06 AM
12

The media "couldn't come up with a story" and "didn't know what to make of it" because it didn't fit the cultural narrative that women are good and men are bad.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:41 AM
0

Where is the inequality in the death rate between men and women? Is it healthcare or occupational? If it's occupational (due to higher participation in deadly industries like construction or other manual labour) then we need to look at that separately. If it's something else, is it something we can even fix? The issue is most likely a combination of factors: 95-99% of workers in the "death" industries are male: fishing, logging, mining, etc Male suicide rates are four times higher than female on…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:57 PM
0

...and then it got invaded by /r/againstmensrights :).
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:24 PM
-2

The free market doesn't care about the homeless, charities care but the government does a better job. At the risk of being accused of mind reading, I think you start out with the assumption that the government must do it, therefore it would be better at it. I think you prematurely dismiss private charities. Let me start from the beginning: The free market only cares in as much as the individual participants care. I think both of us agree that there are people who do care about the homeless, whic…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 04:09 PM
4

Right, or some combination of all three. A more nuanced view would say that the female bias would remain because it's part of our human nature. There would still be wealth transfer from men to women, in the form of marriage, inheritance (the husband usually dies first), or charities (people would want to help strangers who are down and out in old age). The important difference is that the free market wealth transfer would be voluntary, compared to the way it's currently done, coerced under the t…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:23 PM
0

There are several (three or so) countries, such as Swaziland and Zimbabwe, where men live longer than women. I believe that's due to high prevalence of HIV which affects women more in those countries.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:06 PM
-2

heres the MRA solution- equality for all, equal retirement ages, equal funding for mens and women health Even if we make the retirement age equal, massive inequalities still remain: Women live significantly longer and men pay most of the taxes. The only truly equal way to eliminate inequality is to remove the government from the equation. The government creates inequality with everything it does. Let retirement savings and healthcare be handled privately by the free market, rather than through a…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 01:54 PM
2

Record it on camera too, if you can.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:49 AM
5

Leftists like to throw that word around. If you can call the other person racist (which is what they're doing by saying we ignore racism), you score points in the political arena.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:48 AM
3

Totalitarianists would be a more accurate word for them.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:46 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/13mp8k/i_missed_a_meeting_at_my_university_that_im_sure/c75jzvf Here you go, I just replied elsewhere in the thread.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:44 AM
4

While there might be a legitimate concept behind the word ableism, the only people who seem to use it are SRS and Tumblr SJAs. In other words, loonies. Mostly it's intended to silence others by forbidding 'ableist' words such as 'stupid', 'dumb', 'retarded', etc. If you're still not sure what's wrong with that, check out this short video by John Brown.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:41 AM
1

Social Justice Advocate. Click at your own risk.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:30 AM
13

They call us "misters" for good reason! I like it. Sounds classy.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:59 PM
27

Kinda. Trigger warning is common in online female and feminist spaces, while ableism is SRS and SJA territory. When someone mentions ableism in a non-sarcastic way, I know they're fucking nuts.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:58 PM
7

It would help to read the study itself, as parts of the article seem to contradict each other. In the beginning it says: men treat all students the same, regardless of gender. but then it says: male teachers tend to reward male students more than female students.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:55 PM
59

ableism When I see that word, I know to get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:50 PM
29

Female teachers favor female students. Male students know this, which leads them to not try as hard. Male teachers are impartial, which leads to higher effort for both male and female students.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:47 PM
42

Having a male teacher increased the efforts of female students whereas a female teacher lowered the efforts of boys. This one sentence sums up the boys education crisis. Something like 25% of schools no longer have a single full time male teacher.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:28 PM
5

Let's say I'm hiring an engineer for Boeing. There's only two applicants, one white and one african american who seem equally qualified -- an engineering degree and no job experience. Which one do I hire? For all I know the black candidate got admitted to an engineering program not because of merit but because of affirmative action, and was pushed through to make the numbers look good. I just don't know. Why take the chance? Just hire the white guy.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:46 PM
3

Jezebel is owned by morally bankrupt Gawker media. We do not allow Gawker links here.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:33 PM
3

Feminists thought this one through and are way ahead of you on this one. In over 90% of rape accusations there isn't even an alleged struggle. Checkmate, MRAs.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:59 PM
4

So it seems affirmative action isn't enough. They need to handicap everyone else even more? Let's at least start being more honest about it and send white male students in blindfolded and with both hands tied behind their back. If I was African American or Hispanic I would be outraged. Such programs would devalue the diplomas of blacks and hispanics who got in on merit, because employers have no way of knowing that -- all blacks and hispanics with diplomas would be suspect.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:31 PM
56

Sounds similar to the situation black men found themselves in early 1900s after being accused of rape by a white woman. I doubt many of them managed to prove their innocence before they were lynched.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:19 PM
2

It should not be illegal. Such anti-discrimination laws only harm the economy, increase prices and government overhead, and eventually lead to a totalitarian government. So you are ok with charging Blacks or Jews or women or Democrats or the handicapped $1000 a ticket as way to keep them out? If I saw something like that at my store I would certainly inquire as to why they have such a policy. If there wasn't a good business reason then I could stop doing business with the store or let everyone k…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:04 PM
20

I don't mind them advertising it as such. I'd rather they advertise it up front, than silently discard resumes with male sounding names.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:02 PM
2

Was there a specific event or more of a trend? Google is failing me.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:00 AM
2

Online there isn't much risk. It's not unusual to have kids playing with adults, unlike in meatspace where kids and adults usually do not mix. I say if you're enjoying it then go for it.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:34 AM
3

It doesn't matter what you cite, it sounds like they aren't interested in listening. Pick your battles.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:27 AM
3

Around 6% of rapes reported to police end up with a conviction. That doesn't mean they were all legitimate rapes. How many of them are false accusations? How many of them are regret sex? The poster is false because many of what it calls "rapes" are not.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:24 AM
2

I value individual freedom, and that includes freedom of association: One should be free to do or not do business with anyone they choose.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:12 AM
6

On twitter and tumblr feminists are fucking crazy. I'd stay away.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:32 AM
5

Worthless article. Not a single point she raises is worth discussing.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:52 AM
5

It's a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:10 AM
3

War benefits no one except some people at the top and the military industrial complex. I'm against the war in general.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:00 AM
5

This is illegal in some states. However, my personal philosophy is that a business is free to do business with anyone it chooses, and charge what it wants for any reason whatsoever. Adults $6.50 Children $4.00 Seniors/Women/Students $4.00 Somewhere in there is the implication that women aren't adults. Feminists should be outraged. Please do everything you can to get a picture. I'd love to see it.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:53 AM
10

I wonder how having more women would benefit free software.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:32 AM
38

If this is her threat then your relationship is already over. Get your vasectomy ASAP before she "accidentally" becomes pregnant.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:28 PM
4

Male is the default. /s
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:51 AM
1

Murdering people?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:09 AM
1

Your link is broken. Here's the correct one: http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/2012/11/all-things-being-equal.html
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:04 AM
2

They said something about socialists putting the protesters up to it. Anyone have more info about which group is responsible?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 08:03 AM
-4

Women have the option of prostitution. Men do not.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:57 AM
1

So the reasoning the police use... "There's no physical evidence of a crime.. let's arrest the man!"
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:41 AM
-1

It dealt mostly with divorce in christian families. How was it shut down due to censorship? Did you read the post?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:07 AM
1

A leftist masquerading as a libertarian? What is this. He's right though, true freedom is the only way to achieve equality.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 01:50 AM
17

It would be more accurate to say that feminism rigged the game, and men are choosing not to play.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 01:27 AM
3

The current owner is the problem, not a previous owner. She treats the cat as if it were an object, and if it doesn't do what she wants she uses force to get it to comply. If she had a child, he'd be diagnosed with "oppositional defiant disorder" because obviously the child is the problem and not the parent. I hope she never has children.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 01:06 AM
20

This isn't just a problem with the court system in 2000, it is a problem with prosecutor Michael Wendling today. It's the system which allows such prosecutors.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:42 AM
5

The doodle team is always excited to hear ideas from users - they can email [email protected] with ideas for the next Google doodle. The team receives hundreds of requests every day so we unfortunately can't respond to everyone. But rest assured that we're reading them :) Maybe not the right place, but they'd know where to forward it to.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:18 AM
3

She's putting a lot of effort into it for it to be a joke.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:06 PM
6

I saved her blog when she did her whole goodbye-cruel-world farewell thing (which most MRAs fell for). I can upload it if anyone wants to wade through that filth.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:01 PM
4

Because as far as I know they just wanted to be treated equal to men, right? That's what they claim they stand for, but in reality that's not the case.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:07 AM
12

Femen has some serious money backing it. I have no idea what the backers are trying to accomplish, but I hope that helps you understand the actions of these women.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:46 AM
12

Hi. I hope I can clarify it for you. The pictures you posted are of a group called FEMEN. Those women are hired and paid for doing whatever it is you see FEMEN do. I hope this explains why FEMEN's actions are batshit insane. As for SRS, they don't care about women's rights or social justice or anything else they claim to stand for. They just want to make a big splash, like FEMEN, except they're not paid for doing so (or are they...?)
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:43 AM
1

Yes, it blocks the built in videos. Even works in Chrome. For now, anyway.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:31 PM
1

"The oppression of women is in capitalism itself." I guess I should have expected that in a Marxist conference.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:06 PM
1

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl10.xls
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:22 PM
168

"They defend rape, they defend incest, they defend violence against children." How do they say such things with a straight face?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:14 PM
-1

Your comment got linked to from againstmensrights. And they're praising their SRS plant SuicideBanana.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:09 PM
2

There's probably links on the sidebar. As for partners killed, from what I understand those numbers look accurate. Edit: as fifilabec says, women are less likely to be charged, prosecuted or convicted for the same crimes, and are more likely to use proxy violence.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:59 PM
2

The majority of victims of spousal violence continue to be females, accounting for 83% of victims. I haven't looked at your link in detail, but they usually make women look like victims by either redefining 'violence' to include nonsense like 'financial violence' or 'verbal violence' or use reported statistics instead of surveys. Men tend to heavily under-report domestic violence done to them. Almost universally in Canada, US, UK, and Australia domestic violence is 50-50 when it's reciprocal, an…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:40 PM
1

You're right, violent is probably not the right word. But they are standing in front of the entrance and blocking it. But I can't call it non-violent either. If I want to get through to see Dr. Farrell's presentation I have to push one of them aside. And when that happens there's a reasonable chance that they will retaliate with physical force.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:29 PM
1

Look, they're unions. By law they are given a monopoly to a portion of your paycheck. They will do the minimum required by law. They have no incentives to fix anything or follow through on your request. They know the only way for you not to pay your union dues is to quit your job.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:24 PM
1

They were physically blocking the entrance. Also, you don't know if the police asked them to move. I'm certain they did. The feminist friendly cameraman cut that part out to make the police look bad and make themselves look like the victims.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:11 PM
2

"Your definition of sexism is sexist. Please use gender neutral language." Don't beat around the bush.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:02 PM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:56 PM
2

I consider blocking entrance to a public building to be violence since they are using physical force to keep people out. Compare it to me blocking your only exit from a room.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:46 PM
20

Oh, this is good. I never really questioned that Evo Psych view that men do not want long term relationships. However, the author says that view came from sociology -- any feminist roots to it, I wonder? Here's the most important part: You write in the intro, “We teach boys and girls that it’s normal and natural for guys to be promiscuous.” Is it not? What’s wrong with the evolutionary arguments about boys and men wanting to spread their seed? First off, it’s not. All of the research that we hav…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 02:59 PM
3

Doesn't matter to me, but my guess is you'll get downvotes for the title.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 02:39 PM
5

Good job Canadian police. Quick and efficient and didn't put up with feminist nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 02:37 PM
3

You troll. You and your plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 02:36 PM
4

Oh my god! Raaaaape! What if he raaaaapes her without him knowing it?!! Rape culture!!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 02:08 PM
2

He's not an extremist. I guess to an outsider he might sound "kinda mean" but nothing he says is extreme in any way.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 02:04 PM
3

He's a right wing MRA. Most users in here (and on reddit in general) lean to the left, so they don't like Bernard much.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:44 PM
6

They can quote mine you and string parts of different sentences together to make it look like you're saying anything they want. It will happen no matter how careful you are with your phrasing. Just look at how they are quote mining Warren Farrell. If you have something to say, then say it without reservation.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:17 AM
5

Unfortunately it's your so called "Lunatic Fringe" which affects our laws through big-money feminist organizations such as NOW. Of course we want to know what they are doing at all times in the same way an antelope wants to know the location of a lion, or a driver keeps track of police cars in his vicinity.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:16 AM
2

In the 1988 talk by Warren Farrell that I posted yesterday he talks about something similar. Imagine that after the proper preliminaries, such as flirting, etc, you're french kissing a woman and suddenly she withdraws her tongue, pushes you away and says "no". How long does that "no" last? Is it two seconds? Two minutes? Forever? What does the male do? Does he just give up and walk away, knowing that it won't lead to anything more. Dr. Farrell cites a statistic that the average male experiences …
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:12 AM
9

The students protesting the talk had no idea what it was about. It seems someone organized poisoned them and had them protest under false pretenses and so they did like mindless drones. But even if the feminists were right about everything they said. Even if the speakers inside were advocating violence against women and children. Who is in the wrong, one who talks about violence or one who uses violence (like the protesters did)?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:53 AM
-4

Misogyny! Misogyny! Misogyny!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:46 AM
1

It's a good thing white knights are there to protect these defenseless women from "unwanted" attention after posting a panty shot!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:15 AM
0

Women don't want advice. They want validation of their feelings. They want to be told that what they did was right, that they're a victim, and that they could've done nothing to prevent it. It's what they've been told ever since they were a toddler and they will get very hostile to anyone who threatens their little bubble of subjective reality. There are exceptions, but this is one way in which men and women differ.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:47 AM
1

Back in the day we'd be saying "discriminating moms choose jiff" but now that's a bad word.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:17 AM
-1

I'm still waiting for that example of a rapist who grew up in a loving family.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:24 AM
13

That's the kind of corporate climate we live in today. My advice is to avoid female coworkers as much as possible.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:04 AM
7

Female Hysterics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROF-w-96YmU So am I in the wrong here for being mad that she's mad at me for being mad at her? Don't put up with that shit. Letting her get away with it only encourages her to do it more.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:17 PM
2

"pink knights" I love it.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:06 AM
3

This card really sums up today's feminists: http://historyoffeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/Anti-suffrage_post_card.jpg
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:02 AM
1

I bet you in the history of one million rapists, there wasn't one abused as a child. Come on, no statistic in this WORLD is 100%. That's a strawman. I said almost all rapists were abused as children. Then when you contradicted me, I asked you to point to a single case where the rapist was NOT abused as a child. I stand by those two statements.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:57 AM
2

Dude, you can totally do the Hitler mustache. Not only do you get to participate in Movember but you get to wear Hitler too.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:20 AM
-1

Unfortunately that's exactly what happened with the BIC pens she mentioned. Women on the internet were "outraged" at the ridiculousness of BIC "for her": http://jezebel.com/5938108/amazon-customers-go-rogue-hilariously-review-the-bics-idiotic-pen-for-women
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:07 AM
1

I say forced because I make the arbitrary distinction when force or threats of force come into play. In case of gifts, even if society say you should give gifts to a woman (such as a wedding ring), there is no threat of force. Whereas with taxes and child support, if you don't pay they will fine you and will eventually come with guns and lock you up, or shoot you dead if you resist.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:09 AM
-7

Show me a serial rapist who wasn't abused as a child.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:06 AM
1

Check out this video for an explanation of their thinking process: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZJiWPt1NRU#t=1396s
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:10 AM
3

Sorry, but no Gawker links.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:07 AM
3

It's a 5 month old account with no comment history at all. I love how they tell us we're not doing enough, while all they do is complain about us not doing enough. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:00 AM
6

There are things within our power and there are those that aren't. As Gandhi says, be the change you want to see in the world. We have to start with the things we can change and spread those ideas to others: Treat women as equals and don't give them money they don't deserve. Once those attitudes spread, the way the government redistributes funds will change as well. It won't happen overnight.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 12:44 AM
4

All we have to do is stop giving women money. That's really profound. I believe that all social change has economic causes at its roots. One might even make a case for the current problems with gender imbalance being caused by men still giving women money in an age when that's no longer necessary.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 12:07 AM
9

I recommend the book Myth of Male Power by Dr. Warren Farrell. It has all these statistics and dozens of pages of references.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:41 PM
-1

You know what, they'd be complaining no matter what we do. If we make things non-gendered, they yell 'misogyny!' and 'patriarchy!' and how everything is for males by default and there's no room for women yada yada yada. And if things are advertised for women? We get this shit. They'll complain no matter what.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:25 PM
-1

I agree that it's bad to reinforce inaccurate stereotypes. But most stereotypes are true.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:19 PM
10

That's awesome. Reminds me of this: http://i.imgur.com/qGFmD.png
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:17 PM
-2

This is not a question of using politically correct language, but rather of not reinforcing and playing into stereotypes. Why is it bad to reinforce stereotypes?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:09 PM
1

Sure.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:57 PM
22

It's important to separate the cases where men choose to transfer their wealth to women, such as a gift, and when men are forced to do so, such as child support. Here's one that is forced: Women receive more retirement benefits because they live longer. One of the more extreme examples can be found in Lithuania where the retirement age for women is 2.5 years lower than for men and it has one of the largest differences in life expectancy between the sexes (10.8 years). On average men get 5 years …
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:46 PM
5

It becomes a human rights issue when the government tells us who we can and can't associate with. Discrimination means making a choice. By replying to this post here I discriminate against all the other ones. It would be just as insane for the government to tell me I must not discriminate against posters on the internet as it is to tell us who we can associate with.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:55 PM
1

That's not what they're saying here. They're saying sexual abuse during childhood vastly increases the chance of becoming a rapist. It's a well known fact that (almost?) all rapists were abused as children. You do not become a rapist by growing up in a loving environment.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:34 PM
12

It's none of the government's business who people choose to associate with. I take this stand consistently regardless of who is "discriminated" against, whether it's men, women, whites, blacks, etc.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:28 PM
13

And where are children most likely to be abused? Single parent homes. And which parent has kids in vast majority of single parent homes? The mother. And what is to blame for this unprecedented increase in single parent homes? Feminism. If there is rape culture, feminism perpetuates it.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:15 PM
3

Are you fucking kidding me? You have one other submission here in the past year, and that was 5 months ago. You have 8 posts in the last month, with only one or two in the negatives. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:03 PM
3

What? Are we using the SRS "we're a circlejerk" excuse now?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:57 PM
2

This is bizarre. When something makes no sense you have to dig deeper.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:51 PM
1

Status seeking is primary mating behavior for men, but not for women. If I were to make a similar statement about women, I'd say women are more beautiful than men.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:25 PM
2

It's the same troll defending his other 0-day sockpuppet. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:38 AM
3

FDA is already killing a hundred thousand people each year. Maybe it's trying to offset the death toll? Edit: I suppose a statement like that needs some explanation. The lengthy 10-15 year approval process plus the cost of almost one billion per drug are costing us a huge number of lives a year. Even if someone is sick and is willing to take a drug which is not approved by the FDA, the FDA prohibits it. Tens of thousands, if not a hundred thousand of people could be saved by drugs which are curr…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:01 AM
6

He's not jeremiah. Go away, 0-day troll.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:53 AM
6

Brief summary: Due to FDA regulations the largest condoms allowed by law are too small for 5 to 10% of men (millions of men) They can still fit, but increase the chance of breakage by 200% of more Obviously condom breakage can lead to pregnancy, with all the ghastly consequences for men By my estimate this FDA regulation leads to thousands of unwanted pregnancies per year. These men get screwed by FDA and then get screwed again in family courts.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:23 AM
2

Thanks for posting, but it's already been posted today. Please delete your post.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:52 AM
2

Looking good. The subreddit is growing with no signs of slowing down. 1.46% per week growth is probably slightly faster than average, but if we assume we will keep growing at this rate that's +121% per year. I'm hoping we'll hit 100k by August or September next year.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:48 AM
10

Well within the realm of possibility based on other stories I heard.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:43 AM
3

Imagine my surprise a few weeks back when I realized that Aaron was also Captain Capitalism.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:30 AM
-2

I think men are seen as better leaders (because they are), but that perception can also be unfair to capable women who are trying to break through in that line of work.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:29 AM
2

Or those companies will move their headquarters out of EU. There are lots of other places where they'd be welcomed.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:15 AM
9

They've been using gay people for shock value these past 20 years. Well, that has lost its edge. No one is shocked by a gay person any more. So they have to move on to something else. Misandry it is. (God forbid they show a man hitting a woman.. there would be riots on the street.)
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:01 PM
83

Ah, yes, white guilt. They want us to apologize and give them special privileges now because our ancestors were better at conquering the world in the past. Fuck no.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:56 PM
11

The gender diversity delusion: http://www.iea.org.uk/blog/the-gender-diversity-delusion
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:23 PM
7

Ah, the wonders of democracy. The failure of this policy will be blamed on capitalism and the big 'greedy' corporations.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:14 PM
3

This is standard procedure for feminists. Anything they touch is blown out of proportion because they don't have any real issues to focus on. Privilege - There is such a concept in the academic literature, but it has almost nothing to do with how feminists use the term. Sexism - Someone, somewhere, said something bad about a woman. Rape - Does this word mean anything any more? Stalking, harassment - Somewhere, somehow, a man wanted their attention.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:04 PM
2

AVFM does activism. Check out this article posted today: http://www.avoiceformen.com/updates/action-updates/post-us-election-update/
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:49 PM
3

I found that activism on the internet is way more effective. You can reach a larger audience and at this stage in the game we're all about spreading awareness. Besides, people don't come here for activism. They come here to learn and to take their daily dose of the red pill.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:15 PM
3

If their communist 'utopia' ever comes about, it will be the most cruel and totalitarian regime the world has ever seen. That whole sub together with /r/anarchism is infested with feminists and is batshit insane.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:02 PM
2

However, other scientists remain sceptical. “At first sight this is a classic case of Arts Faculty science. Never mind the hypothesis, give me the data, and there aren’t any,” said Professor Steve Jones, a geneticist at University College London. “I could just as well argue that mutations have reduced our aggression, our depression and our penis length but no journal would publish that. Why do they publish this?” Professor Jones said. Exactly. No data at all, merely speculation. Real studies hav…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:59 PM
5

Well, this will work about as well as it did for Norway (not at all). Expect stock price of affected companies to fall as investors leave for greener pastures.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:53 PM
2

And the alternative is to get snookered in by a real female?
/r/MGTOW14/11/12 04:50 PM
9

Essentially that's how it is. Women are always victims. When a woman beats up her husband, the fist question everyone asks is, "What did he do to deserve it?" When a man beats up his wife, no questions are asked and he's immediately condemned as a wife-beater and a monster, regardless of whether it was in self-defense. When the police respond to a domestic violence call and they see the man has wounds, but the wife is untouched, who do they arrest? Why, the man of course. Femitheist has her geno…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:44 AM
6

Feminists love to quote that highly misleading statistic. It's debunked here starting on page 908: http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/254/mcneely.pdf
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:51 AM
10

I'm torn here. Is it cruel to tell a retarded kid that he's not special, that everyone lied to him all this time? Or does he need a dose of reality?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:39 AM
23

The government turned prostitution into a dangerous job when they made it illegal. The way to stop this violence is to legalize prostitution.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:34 AM
2

Daycare provider is employing a 6 month old? That's gotta be against child labor laws.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:22 AM
-3

Merry Christmas Rachel! Santa wanted to drop off an early gift for a good girl, but my gift to you comes with rules and regulations.... Your boyfriend will ALWAYS be the best boyfriend! (don't ever forget). Wearing the earrings is allowed only in your boyfriend's presence. Give your boyfriend blowjobs once in a while...you might be able to wear the earrings longer. Don't ignore your kitchen responsibilities. Santa has the right to revoke your privileges at any time if you do not follow my rules.…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:23 AM
12

While it is written with humor, I believe it's deadly serious. I remember when my parents would give me gifts they always came with strings attached. They were always conditional. Do your chores or they'll be taken away. If they gave money it could only be spent on things they approved of. Once or twice they wrote up a "contract", thankfully not for the gifts, but equally as silly. It shouldn't take much imagination to imagine someone who grew up under similar parental practices and apply them t…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:22 AM
10

The red pill is bitter medicine.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:26 AM
15

Do lions conspire to kill an antelope? Do they sit in a smoke-filled room twirling their evil mustaches planning their next kill? No, they just act according to their nature. This is what they do. Same thing with how men and women approach reproduction. This is all instinctual but described in economic terms.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:58 AM
6

Ah, yes, I believe this is one of those "red flags" one should look for. PS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh0AhrY9GjA
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:52 AM
5

How's so?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:48 AM
11

http://intentious.com/2012/08/27/sabotaging-slutwalk-like-a-man/ That's exactly how it is. Check out this article if you want to read more about that. It's a long article but well worth the read if you want to understand why it is that women slut shame and not men.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:24 AM
-5

Full speed ahead Obama, you're about to drive this train off a cliff.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:59 AM
11

That's how the state works. They beat you into submission. Obey or we have a gun pointed at your head.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:56 AM
16

"Rape Advice" sounds a bit... rapey. How about we call it sex advice?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:47 AM
20

You can also ask how Nigerian scammers do what they do. How can they rob people for their life's savings? And the answer is simple -- in their mind they dehumanize their victims. They think something along the lines of "If he fell for it he deserves it." I'm sure for the woman that's not far from how she already sees all men.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:21 AM
48

Imagine how hard it is for these men to come forward.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:46 PM
1

Thanks for confirming the details. This is pretty much what I thought happened. She didn't "hang on to the tree for hours" and she singled the man out as a scapegoat.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:12 PM
2

Also, one aspect of child abuse (especially of sexual nature) is that it makes women more promiscuous. If she was abused as a child it might be best to stay away.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:01 PM
6

Joke's on us. Women don't need this book -- they either know what's inside it instinctually or learn it from a very young age. They get to practice on their fathers and brothers and have their mother as a role model.
/r/MGTOW13/11/12 05:58 PM
1

Don't go to hostile subreddits. You either have to moderate your speech or you end up banned -- or both. It's not worth it.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:58 PM
4

Anyway, I think that I need to tone it down a bit. My remarks are not hateful or rants, I just try to stand up for myself in the face of male bashing and share my opinions on the issues with them. I don't think that most of them will be talking to me any time soon, which sucks. Should I be apologizing? What do you say to show them that you're not blaming women for the ills of society, but just want respect? So they're free to spread their misandry, but you feel you're stepping over the line for …
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:13 PM
1

Twice as many women graduating with degrees as men. Looks like half of them will have to settle for men without degrees and be "unhaaapy".
/r/MGTOW13/11/12 01:48 PM
32

I got threatening texts from her boyfriend (who is obviously her using a friend's phone, lol) calling me a rapist. I wonder if she did have a boyfriend, which was why she changed her mind halfway through.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:39 PM
1

Yep, you're right on. This would be a redefinition of the marriage contract, except with terms being explicitly spelled out. Currently if you get married you really have no idea what you're signing away or what will happen during a divorce -- nothing is spelled out in the contract. If marriage was treated like a normal contract it would be ruled null and void.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:29 AM
4

I can't imagine what it's like having to study and regurgitate that "marxist lens" and "feminist lens" bullshit. Just the thought of having to do that gets my heart rate up, because that's nothing but indoctrination with them holding your education hostage if you give them the "wrong" answers.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:19 AM
1

I'm trying to show you that even though a law is only applicable to one sex, it might be unfair to the other. Why should the mother have the right to murder her unborn child, but not the father?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:00 AM
0

Babies can't choose where they want to live and if their father is not supporting the child and didn't support their mother through the pregnancy, he would have no valid argument that he should be entitled to any rights regarding the child. If you look at it biologically it makes sense for a young child to be with the mother as she's the only one who can breastfeed. But it's up to both parents to work it out like adults. I haven't said anything about "rights", so if you use that term please defi…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:54 AM
2

How are they different? They both restrict one sex from doing something based on an anatomical feature of the other. But according to you they would be egalitarian. I guess if a woman had a penis she could vote, but, well, too bad. You have to do better than that to justify that the abortion law is egalitarian. Calling me a troll doesn't help.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:42 AM
55

Awesome. We cannot make progress without crossing the invisible line.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:33 AM
1

You seem to be very confused. The discussion is about what the definition of rape should be, not what you think it currently is.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:30 AM
0

So if I make a law that says anyone without a penis can't vote, it would be equality under the law because it is an unfortunate consequence of our biology that women do not have a penis. It is not relevant to equal rights under the law because the law doesn't define who has a penis.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:28 AM
2

But why should only the mother and not the father have rights to the fetus? That doesn't seem very egalitarian.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:57 AM
1

If he agrees to stick around, then that's fine. Look at it from the woman's point of view: If the potential father isn't willing to sign a contract saying he'll stick around, maybe she should find someone else who will.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:55 AM
1

The father would just walk out, leave his wife, his job and his kids and disappear into nowhere? I suppose it could also happen that he dies in a car accident, leading to the same predicament. Since something like this could happen, they would have to plan for the possibility ahead of time. Obviously I don't know exactly how things work, but these problems are not insurmountable. She could pay for insurance against just such eventuality, or have her husband pay for it as part of the whole having…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:38 AM
1

Then it sounds like the father would be taking care of the children. Or he could pay her to take care of them. It's up to all of them to work it out.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:21 AM
58

This one is a classic on Craigslist in case you haven't read it. Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:20 AM
1

The woman can abort the child. The man cannot.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:11 AM
1

Once the child is born neither parent "owns" the child. If the parents don't live together the child is free to live with whichever parent it chooses. I say the woman is responsible for the pregnancy because if the woman gets pregnant and has a child without the man's consent, there's a good chance she'll be stuck raising the child without the man's support.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:04 AM
0

What's their username?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:58 AM
3

Congrats. Unfortunately this is how far we must go to have control of our lives in today's world. I'm interested to the answer to Alleggro's questions down below.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:04 AM
2

Actually sex robots are integral to our plot to overthrow the patriarchy and establish a matriarchal utopia. Using the weapons of mass distraction, exhaustion, inducing of heart attacks and crippling performance anxiety we intend to take our rightful throne. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:48 PM
1

Read more about that paper here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:26 PM
3

Quantum Gravity is a social construct: http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:20 PM
0

On the other side of the equation, what is your answer to your own question? If not equality (of rights) than what is the better alternative? How does the MRM represent that, and not equality of rights? I feel the government should stay out of our lives. Paying child support should be entirely voluntary. There are some interesting consequences which stem from this simple change: Since getting pregnant is something which happens to their bodies, women are now responsible for a pregnancy. This mea…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:14 PM
1

The most obvious ones are the ones central to men's rights: Father's rights and rights to child. The way it is now the woman has absolute veto power on everything since the moment of conception. How would you have gender egalitarianism in this case? What would constitute "equal rights?" Regardless of what you decide, other people will disagree. Who is right and who is wrong? Should the majority decide for the minority? And if that's the case, can you really call that egalitarianism?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:59 PM
3

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bug%20Catcher
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:13 PM
11

Also during that time frame 4895 children were killed by their mothers, 66% of them boys in the US alone. There is a war of mothers on their boys! *Statistics extrapolated from those for year 2010
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:42 PM
3

Just goes to show that if they want to find you guilty, they'll find some bullshit law to charge you with. No one is safe.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:18 PM
2

Scientists also conducted the baby experiment with non human primates and the results were similar. Here's an article about kibbutz you might find interesting: http://www.heretical.com/wilson/rkibbutz.html
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:16 PM
2

My understanding is that egalitarianism is simply the pursuit of equal rights for both men and women. What is so impossible about that? You will see the problem as soon as you de-obfuscate the phrase 'equal rights' and try to rigorously define what that means. If you restate that as "equality under the law," how do you handle cases where laws for men and women have to be different because of their differing anatomy? How do you define "equal" in those cases? Even if you arrive at some definition …
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:08 PM
2

Right. If you hear a feminist speak out against sex robots you know they're part of the matriarchy who wants to keep the male lifespan down (so that women can collect all the social security benefits for themselves).
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:47 PM
2

PS: Thanks for at least being open to differing/non-agreeing ideals. I made one post in r/againstmensrights pointing out the irrelevance of a point in a post made, and instantly got downvoted with no regard made to the content in my post. Not that I expected any different, but it's difficult to pick their brains as to why they're against the MRM, when they aren't willing to entertain anything beyond parallel opinions/comments. They're a hate group part of the SRS network. I'm surprised you didn'…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:38 PM
-2

Your response strongly shows that your adherence to capitalist principles is based on ideology not "reality". Capitalism is based on the principle that if two people make an exchange, both are better off for it. This way the market decides the optimal distribution of goods. If you're saying that's based on ideology and not reality, I'd want to hear why you think that. First of all, you claim that "communism" has been implemented, when in reality they have been fascist states. It's never been imp…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:33 PM
8

What if all women were bigger and stronger than you What good is being bigger and stronger in today's society where you cannot make use of that advantage?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:31 PM
5

That cat is awesome. And the sheep, too.
/r/MGTOW12/11/12 07:17 PM
2

Yep, economists are not only concerned with incentives but also with their unintended consequences. However, if instead of applying this experiment to individuals if you applied it to an economy of millions of people by rewarding one type of work more than another, you would get more of the work which you reward.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:47 PM
3

It might have started out as satire, but sadly it has been taken up as a serious mantra by the feminists.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:02 PM
-5

Communism is as anti-reality as feminism -- both place ideology above reality, which is why so many feminists are also communists. Without the economic incentives of capitalism a society cannot function efficiently. How can you discount the failures of communism in the 20th century?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:57 PM
12

This is a very good point and I wish I could upvote you more than once. The kids, a two and a four year old have no autonomy of their own. They don't have a choice to leave -- they have to stay with the mother. The mother not only doesn't evacuate in time but drives outside in the middle of the worst part of the hurricane. This isn't just an accident -- this is criminal negligence leading to the kids' deaths. This is not an accident, it is stupidity of the highest order. And yet no one except yo…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:29 PM
5

I don't understand how the kids got washed away, unless she left them unattended...in a hurricane. If she was gonna go up to the porch, why wouldn't she bring them with her? I'm willing to bet they got washed away first, and then she went up to the door to seek help to look for them.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:00 PM
4

According to the man's story the woman was not seeking shelter, thus she didn't have her kids with her. She wanted him to come out and risk his life in the hurricane.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:58 PM
5

It's really bizarre. Her reasons for throwing the flowerpot were not to seek shelter but to get the man to come out and help her.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:57 PM
3

Each of their stories are different but they do not really contradict each other. I'm sure she came up and asked him to come out and help. The hurricane was so loud that he couldn't tell that the voice was female -- and really, he didn't expect a female to be outside in a hurricane. Of course this was after her kids got swept away -- she wanted him to come and and help her search for them.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:53 PM
3

TLDR: Had sex when I didn't want to. TLDR makes it sound like rape, but obviously it wasn't rape by any reasonable definition of rape.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:46 AM
33

This happened during hurricane Sandy. From the description the conditions outside were really bad. Imagine if the sexes were reversed. If a man came knocking on a woman's door during a hurricane asking her to come outside and help him there would be excuses made on her behalf such as "she was scared" and "it would be too dangerous to go outside." Not so for this man. He's being vilified by the media, the cops and the community for not putting his own life at risk. It also sounds like there wasn'…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:35 AM
2

Specifically almost every single reply tells him to either ignore it or study at a different location. What if it was his dad calling his mom a crazy slut and a whore? I think the ratio of those advocating non-intervention would suddenly be flipped.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:54 AM
-2

The reason we haven't seen this is due to lobbying by radical feminists. Not only that but the definition of rape has been expanding more and more. According to feminists: Either party is drunk? Man raped the woman! No enthusiastic verbal consent from the woman? Man raped the woman! I think a fair definition of rape would hinge on whether a reasonable person believed they were committing a rape. If the woman flirted, got undressed, and is lying there like a dead fish it would not be considered r…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:43 AM
-3

Looks like his thread in /r/feminism was already deleted.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:23 AM
-1

EDIT: other thread was auto-baleeted by the bot. I hope it will be reinstated soon; until then, this is the only one. What makes you think it was the bot? If it was deleted by a bot why would it wait 4 hours after you posted it to delete it?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:23 AM
12

It's not rape if there is no intent. If she consents to sex and then withdraws consent in the middle of the act without informing her partner, she cannot later claim it was rape because she withdrawn consent solely in her mind.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:11 AM
7

Your definition of rape is problematic because the woman can change consent ex post facto, leading to "regret rape". This is exactly what I'm saying should not be allowed. The vast majority of rapes occur because of a lack of understanding of consent and a lack of recognition for people's right to their bodies. Then your definition of rape is faulty. A woman should not be allowed to flirt with a guy, express nonverbal consent, have sex and later claim it was rape and send the man to prison for t…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:04 AM
12

Without intent there is no murder. If it happened due to negligence it could be prosecuted as manslaughter.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:41 AM
8

That definition of rape is troubling because it turns the majority of consensual sex acts into rape. In the majority of cases there is no verbal consent as it is given through body language.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:38 AM
1

I repeat, with murder there's never a question of consent. I imagine in countries where assisted suicide is allowed both people sign a contract, possibly in front of a witness or a lawyer. Rape and murder are entirely different.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:33 AM
8

That's exactly the opposite of what I said and I have no idea how you managed to misinterpret it so completely. The question of intent is absolutely essential in our legal system for determining whether someone is guilty or innocent. As I said above, I think any definition of rape where the 'rapist' doesn't know he's committing a rape is problematic, meaning there must be a mens rea or intent for it to be defined as rape. For a rape to happen there has to be some indication that the other party …
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:28 AM
0

What point are you trying to make? Rape and murder are two very different crimes. With murder there is never a question of consent while rape hinges on it.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:18 AM
3

Susan Atkins totally looks like CreepyChan.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:21 AM
4

It's ironic how quickly feminists are to accept the fruits of scientific reason such as iPhones, contraceptives, makeup and tampons while at the same time denouncing the very science responsible for their creation.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:18 AM
7

She said that she felt raped, but she didn't feel like he had raped her per se (I'm paraphrasing here, I should warn you). Well yeah, that happens when consent is withdrawn ex post facto.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:41 AM
31

I think any definition of rape where the 'rapist' doesn't know he's committing a rape is problematic.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:02 AM
1

Likewise, what do you do when you think you should be paid 10k a month, but employers think you're worth minimum wage? Why, you become a feminist.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 10:27 PM
1

Of what use is that learning to society?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 10:01 PM
1

Please no gawker links. Also: at that age, I was more concerned with Video Music Box than being a 'video vixen' or chaising boys. Do they not even use a spell checker?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 09:04 PM
0

The people who complain about sexual objectification say that women are treated as sexual objects, that is, they exist solely for reproduction and sexual gratification of males. I'm saying that if they have no other skills to offer society, then yeah, that's all they are. GWW talks about a different kind of sexual objectification (the phrase means different things for each feminist -- although they all agree it's somehow bad). Of course I agree with what GWW says in her video.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 08:40 PM
-1

1: That the only ones (Or even largely the ones) complaining about sexual objectification are people with gender studies degrees. Not just gender studies. Sociology, humanities, communication, english literature, philosophy and other worthless degrees. 2: That they didn't pursue these degrees for reasons related to sexual discrimination, isn't it likely that gender studies would attract people with a personal history related to those studies? What? 3: That a persons worth is what they can offer …
/r/MensRights11/11/12 08:35 PM
2

She's saying you're projecting? I think that, in itself, is projection.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 06:31 PM
2

I just jumped out of an airplane without a parachute. Reddit, what should I do???! (No, it's not rape. Neither when a man does it, nor when a woman does it.)
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:23 PM
5

"Patriarchy hurts men too!"
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:48 PM
1

It has to do with our biology: Which sex is the passive receiver and which is the initiator.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:48 PM
7

[–]IAMATruckerAMA -22 points 14 hours ago (21|43) Each sex has its privileges. There's reason I unsubscribed from default subs. 90% of redditors there are retarded. He said something undeniably true and got downvoted into oblivion.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:46 PM
-1

When I hear a statement from a woman which contradicts reality, I know it's projection.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:32 PM
19

"We need to teach murderers not to murder." This is how feminists sound.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:30 PM
1

Now that I think about it it makes perfect sense that each individual human life is valued less in a collectivist culture, i.e. in asia.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 06:05 AM
1

fry.jpg Not sure if downvoted for making a negative generalization about Chinese or Americans.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:59 AM
4

Exactly.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:56 AM
-1

The point isn't to make your home absolutely secure. There is no such thing as absolute security. You just want to make it more difficult to break into. Let's apply that to rape. You cannot avoid all rapes. You just want to avoid being an easy target. Walking around at 2am while intoxicated in a dark alley in a black neighborhood is not a good idea. That's just asking to get raped.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:43 AM
0

Sorry but sometimes we need to know when to retreat. I ain't sticking my hand in that wasp nest.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:35 AM
6

Some of those pictures are truly lulzworthy: https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/14424_455761954466206_2024077221_n.jpg "Don't judge me, you only see what I choose to show you." So we can't judge you on what you choose to show us? What? These days whenever I see /r/againstmensrights or /r/wherearethefeminists or /r/mister I just laugh. I really do laugh out loud. It's like, how do they come up with this stuff? (Don't post in those subs -- they got us all tagged with RES and they'll ban u…
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:29 AM
3

Yep. If you ever end up in court for self-defense against a woman, that mace might just save you from prison. It doesn't have the same stigma as punching a woman, so the jury isn't as likely to wrongly convict you.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:38 AM
35

Mothers with boys are some of the strongest MRAs. Girlwriteswhat and typhonblue. Also plenty of women post here, although I'm not sure how many of them are mothers.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:33 AM
1

We're anti-feminist because we've seen what you've accomplished with the laws you passed. No thanks.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:30 AM
6

Definitely get a paternity test. If it comes back yours -- I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:52 AM
5

The twitter feminists are batshit insane. I just ignore them. They also post their misandry at #mensrights hashtag.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:14 AM
15

She hit him first? Why am I not surprised at all..
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:12 AM
8

You don't see anything wrong with getting 10 years in prison for having sex with a 16 year old? It would've been legal in 39 states. Also check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent Except for some African and Islamic Middle Eastern countries, USA and Australia, the age of consent is 16 or 14 or lower worldwide. Such high age of consent laws in the US are the result of feminism trying to expand the power of women -- and it worked, too.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:48 PM
0

I'm willing to bet this has nothing to do with the affair. He probably fell out of favor for one reason or another and they used the affair to get him to resign. That's how these things are done.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:28 PM
0

Kits can be bought at... HYMENSHOP.COM. Product advertised as: Newly Developed Technology enables the amazing ability to become a virgin again!
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:22 PM
-4

That can't be right! According to SRS /r/feminism is under MRA control!
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:09 PM
44

Thanks for sharing your story. You're absolutely right that it's entirely unfair to the father. Especially when the parents aren't married, the system allows the mother to: Retain custody of the child Not allow the father any visitation Collect child support for the next 18 years And there's nothing the father can do about it. In certain socio-econo-ethnic communities getting pregnant is a "win", a mealticket, leading to out of wedlock birth rates of 70? 80? percent, if not higher. And then soci…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:03 PM
3

It's good that he's moving away from freethoughtblog bashing (talk about a target rich environment!) and moving into MRM issues. At least I hope that's the trend.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:21 PM
4

Quantum Gravity is a social and linguistic construct.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 07:48 PM
6

If I choose not to have children, my masculinity will not be called into question. Society thinks it's men's obligation to have children and provide for them. When Professor Mentu was getting his vasectomy (I believe he's over 30) the doctor simply refused because he had no kids. Mentu had to pay a friend to pretend to be his wife to get another doctor to approve the procedure. This is extremely common. Society thinks it's a man's duty to have children. If I have children and a career, no one wi…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 04:26 PM
1

He's still not back. Hmm.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 04:08 PM
107

That man showed way more restraint than I would have shown. Edit: They just let her walk away after all that? Jesus christ.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:56 PM
4

Loved it except for the last paragraph. No matter how useless women may become, that will never happen.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:23 PM
13

They're all on tumblr. That's the "4th wave."
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:14 PM
22

At the end of the day, I think it's more important to get innocent people out of prison. We need to set up incentives that work to prevent innocent people going to prison in the first place. Currently a woman can expect no punishment or a mere slap on the wrist for sending an innocent man to jail. This shit needs to stop. I don't care if less rapists get convicted as a result, but when you have innocent people going to prison the whole system breaks down.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:59 PM
45

Kudos for sticking to your guns and making them move their car. The douchebaggery on their part should be called out regardless of what's between their legs.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:52 PM
50

If having physical possession of a phone is consent to text $10 to red cross, then dressing like a slut is consent to sex.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:03 PM
3

Some of the top comments to that video in /r/politics, some of them having thousands of upvotes: [TRIGGER WARNING] thank god we've elected a human Seriously. I just can't understand how some people hate this man. I know that he's not perfect, but he clearly moves with the best intentions. His capacity to empathize is amazing. Exactly. He's the first president who seems like a normal guy. He reminds me of my friends. He's somebody who's willing to set aside his own ideological leanings to try and…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:05 AM
9

This is the newest variation of the urban legend where you hear a baby at your door step, you open your door to investigate and you GET RAPED.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:00 AM
6

Ms Bryant testified she was "embarrassed, remorseful, scared and disgusted" on realising what she had done. Bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 10:37 PM
2

Native populations of western countries are already below replenishment. This should be a message to the third world.
/r/MGTOW09/11/12 10:35 PM
29

The reports also show that when Breivik was just four-years-old, his mother became preoccupied with fears that her son would violently assault someone. "She saw him as an adult violent person, even though he was only a small boy," said Aage Borchgrevink, author of A Norwegian tragedy. "She was afraid that he would assault people." The psychologist reports show that Wenche Behring already felt her son was "aggressive, hyperactive and clingy," when she was breastfeeding him. Classic projection. Sh…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:59 PM
-3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:30 PM
13

Yep, kids who grow up to do these kinds of things were always abused. The same probably holds true for the more extreme of the radfems.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:28 PM
5

It's about time women admit their immunological privilege.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:31 PM
3

The best answer is to reply with this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjlVfoVSr-Q
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:50 PM
6

Not sure if these two are logically equivalent for your purpose, but here goes: Should men have a right to bodily autonomy? Should men have to pay child support? The point that if men have to pay child support, they have to work for that money and thus do not have bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:44 PM
13

There's also no shortage of white knights at any bar. All a woman has to do is insinuate that a man looked at her wrong and the white knights will flock to throw him out to have a chance with her.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:51 PM
12

Doesn't this lying to women remind you of how we lie to retarded kids? We call them "gifted". We tell them that they're as good as all the other kids, or even better. We tell them that other kids make fun of them because they're jealous.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:46 PM
49

And no refutation of any of the claims is even attempted. A simple "How dare you say that!" is sufficient to silence all criticism.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:48 PM
2

The article touches on some interesting issues but leaves too much unsaid. Check out the Bomb and the Brain series which describes how early childhood affects us as adults.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:34 AM
4

From the same book as that quote: His sex act, intercourse, explicitly announces his power over her: his possession of her interior; his right to violate her boundaries. His state promotes and protects his sex act. If she were not a woman, this intrusion by the state would be recognized as state coercion, or force. The act itself and the state that protects it call on force to exercise illegitimate power; and intercourse can­not be analyzed outside this system of force. But the force is hid­den …
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:01 AM
3

"Why does Zelda always have to save the princess?" /troll
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:45 AM
6

Oh god we're the most barbaric country in the world.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 12:15 AM
2

Mom: Just be yourself! It'll work out! Thanks mom.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:30 PM
14

How much of this can be attributed to women being better at lying, and how much is it due to men evolving to be more susceptible to such behavior?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:24 PM
8

He messed up the joke. The part where he said "each floor has something better than the last" should have been left out. A new, special kind of store just opened up in a Manhatten shopping center. This store sells husbands, yes that's right - women can browse men from floors of choices. Actually, there are 6 floors of men, and with an increase in the floor level bringing an positive attributes... a nifty setup - with a catch. As you open the door to any floor, you may choose a man from that floo…
/r/MGTOW08/11/12 09:37 PM
1

I must've forgotten my sarcasm tag. Regardless of whether it's true or not, that's what society believes and blames men for any communication problems.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:24 PM
5

I wonder if she "misheard" on purpose. It seemed like a highly charged conversation.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:18 PM
3

Divorce rate higher for couples that share housework, study finds
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:05 PM
0

OK, back up a step here and try to think about this like a rational adult - both genders have problems communicating. If someone tries to say it's "all the man", they're either lying or dating a guy with Aspergers. Again, communication isn't the major issue. Lack of communication is an ex post facto rationalization for a failed marriage. What happens if a guy decides he's not happy with the woman? Aren't they just as stubborn as women? Have you ever heard of this happening? Even once? "Oh, I div…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:55 PM
4

Although, IMHO, 90% of the problem is communication, one (or both) people can't really talk to the other person honestly and openly because of emotional or cultural barriers. No! This "communication is the problem" meme is another way they blame everything on the man, because obviously the man has worse communication skills than the woman. 90% of communication is either nonverbal or is conveyed by the person's tone, and less than 10% is the actual content of the words. Once the woman decides she…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:23 PM
8

Do tape it! I've love to see the highlights. Make sure to question the security personnel as to why the woman you saw walking around was allowed to have her backpack but not you. Make sure to use a hidden camera because they can ask you not to tape inside the store and you have to comply, but if it's a hidden camera obviously they won't ask.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:15 PM
17

Anyone know of a study looking at how impartial male and female judges are?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:09 PM
4

I agree entirely. I think this is largely due to hypergamy on the part of the female -- once she loses interest in her current mate there is nothing he can do to fix it. The bullying of the male by marriage counselors and churches only makes things worse because submissiveness only makes her lash out at him more. Check out the AVFM radio today at 6pm PST -- I think they'll talk about this in detail.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:06 PM
1

And the classic one: You're making us look bad!
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:37 PM
-2

Let them. They're good for a laugh.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:24 PM
7

But if you are a male working towards a happier marriage, then finding someone who isn't going to simply blame you is important. It might be like looking for a needle in a haystack, but it's better than having one doing even more damage to your relationship by always siding with the wife.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 05:06 PM
25

Women -- the only group of people who can be victims and heroes at the same time.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 04:30 PM
18

Question for anyone masochistic enough to read the blog post, is there anything worthwhile in there?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:33 PM
1

This is another law created by feminists to give women more power.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:01 PM
10

lol That's all I gotta say.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:55 PM
173

This is why men do not like going to marriage counselors. They're always at fault no matter what. I wonder how the counselor would have reacted if you kicked her but not very hard.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:43 PM
19

Maybe do what this man does in the elevator? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRfjLfyXYlA
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:34 PM
3

Having the house is a big advantage. Hang on to it! By the way, in such cases I've heard of the wife draining shared bank accounts (or even those in your name?) as well as running up all the joint credit cards. Ask your lawyer what you should do and how you can protect yourself against that.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:16 PM
5

Easy to google, but here you go: http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/why-does-anyone-have-children/
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:52 PM
10

Purely from the numbers perspective, lots of people are behind on child support and only a small percentage of them are sent to jail (single digits?). I think they're reluctant to send people to jail for failure to pay child support because you can't really make money from jail. What are they going to do then, keep you in jail forever?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:51 AM
36

I'm sorry. I've heard dozens of such stories and there's one thing common to all of them: Once she starts lying to the police she doesn't stop until she's done everything she can to destroy you. Please do everything you can to protect yourself. Don't be "noble" or a "hero" or the "good guy" or even think that you can reason with her. She is the person who can utterly destroy your life. Ask your attorney if there's anything you can do to protect yourself from future false accusations, police repo…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:42 AM
20

There's been studies done showing that happiness of both parents goes down significantly when the child is born, and stays that way I believe until the child leaves home. So by having a child you're lowering your satisfaction with life for the next 18 years or possibly much longer, depending on how many children you will have. They're envious of you because you have an easier life as someone who is not married and doesn't have kids. They're miserable and they want you to share that misery. If th…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:27 AM
0

Every female has an Ownership Distortion Field (ODF) around her -- anything in contact with her or even within her vicinity automatically becomes her property in perpetuity. This applies to objects as well as human beings. Her unborn child is hers -- she can murder it at will. Small children are also hers -- she can murder them with few if any consequences. Those who have sex with her become her property -- either through child support if she gets pregnant, or she can send them to jail through f…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:11 AM
-3

The argument against this kind of "legal paternal surrender by default" which isn't usually mentioned but I think on some level everyone understands is that the mother will most likely have the baby even without the father's financial support because of the welfare system. Consider that a third of pregnancies which were a result of rape are carried to term. Mothers are not disincentivized enough not to have the baby without the father present, or even without the father's child support. If we ar…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:56 AM
1

It's more like if they get paid when someone is talking to them or about them. They come in through your door or call you and instead of locking them out or blocking them on your phone, you start to campaign against them. Now you got half the internet talking about them and the feminist is raking in the dough. Since you understand the problem, why are you giving them more traffic?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:27 AM
-1

It's sad that most of reddit is falling for it. Those who say that it's fake are downvoted hard. Most of boys on reddit haven't had the life experiences of being manipulated by women to tell real tears from the crocodile ones. Even 4chan thinks it's fake.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:22 AM
4

Why link to this? She's just like Rebecca Watson but in the gaming community. Both attention whore and trollfeed for financial gain.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:11 AM
5

It is said that language evolved to win arguments. Later, logic and reason were developed as an alternative arguing strategy.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:07 PM
9

That's what /r/againstmensrights is for. It's like SRS but jacked up to 9000. Aerik should be a comedian. (Don't post there -- they'll ban you right away and will probably use their "GoAwayMRA" account to do it)
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:58 PM
5

Well, that's one marriage that won't last long. If I knew that man I'd tell him to get the fuck out. Feel sorry for him for what he's going to go through with divorce.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:54 PM
2

Right. I remember that post by Gareth. Now, I'm far from an expert on this topic and have no inside mod knowledge, but I had to assume Gareth was misguided about any such agreement -- because such an agreement would be so far outside of what I consider reality.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:51 PM
1

Oh, don't forget that they get all the TV shows and movies from the US. They know what US society is like, at least on the surface. To them we are a movie.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:44 PM
9

Could be, but to me that sounds like post-hoc rationalization. That agreement would not make sense at all because us linking to them would benefit them, and them linking to us would benefit us. It's like two people agreeing that neither will gift $1000 to the other. Besides, I wouldn't expect SRS to honor any agreement. It's like making an agreement with North Korea.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:20 PM
1

That's how I see it too. You're buying yourself about 5 years before the woman is thoroughly Americanized. And women adapt fast to the new environment -- it was a survival trait when they became war brides.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:01 PM
17

They stopped linking to us at all because none of their smearing tactics were working and was only giving us more subscribers.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:47 PM
2

Are you sure the school has your contact address in the system?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:45 PM
6

Unfortunately logic doesn't work on a room full of buffoons.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:31 PM
5

I didn't watch the whole thing, but it seems like she sees the problem, sees that feminism is somehow connected, but falls short of identifying the specific causes. She thinks men aren't marrying because women are giving away sex for free. Ha! That may be part of it, but a very small part.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:17 PM
3

When the Taser is fired at a man from a position below his chest, that is from a kneeling position or when the shooter is below the victim, the Taser will spear the genitals nearly 100 percent of the time. Also, the further away from the victim the shooter is, the higher the percentage of shots that will spear the genitals. Really? Nearly 100% of the time? Genitals are fairly small and the taser projectile is quite big. It doesn't have a pinpoint accuracy of a gun. I understand the issues the ar…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:06 PM
2

It's the typical imbalance of incentives described by public choice theory.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:40 PM
3

The founding fathers were classical liberalists. Very different from today's big government statists.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:38 PM
2

Here's part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekFWHjIrj_g
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:22 PM
19

What exactly did you suggest?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:53 PM
2

Don't give them any ideas...
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:51 PM
3

They'd probably think Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal wasn't tongue in cheek either. Satire only works on people with a brain.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:14 PM
6

Gasp I'm offended that your boss would be perpetuating negative stereotypes of women! Like, what a misogynist!
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:59 PM
7

Here's the full text of Proposition 35 (It's in the middle of the pdf, so scroll down)
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:14 PM
3

Poe's Law applies. I can't tell if it's serious or satire.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:02 AM
3

I gotta admit, if you skip the last paragraph or two it's a well written article.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:55 AM
8

Those who chose the right side offered the hilarious excuse that, with only a disembodied vagina and a set of legs to worry about, they didn't have to deal with any unwelcome back chat or annoying conversation. And those who opted for the left explained that, without the aforementioned legs, their girlfriend's torso wouldn't be able to run away. Ok, at the risk of downvotes I did find this funny.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:54 AM
14

He was celibate his whole life, and never married. I admire Tesla for his scientific work, but this wasn't his forte.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:55 PM
8

Excellent point. With the drug war the government demolished much of our property rights. They can seize private property including houses and cars no matter how tenuously related to drugs. Through drug wars they got into anti-money laundering laws, which allows them to track monetary transactions in unprecedented ways. Mexico, Italy and Spain already banned large cash transactions on the pretense of money laundering and tax evasion. Police and DEA powers were expanded significantly with SWAT te…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:08 PM
0

It's the Manocide to end all violence. Didn't work so well for Hitler, I think.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:16 PM
1

That's exactly right. In a community you describe the interaction is entirely voluntary. I can choose to or refrain from selling with anyone I wish. And the community is free to not buy from me. Knowing this 'rule' of the community I would do my best not to break it, because the consequences for doing so would be quite costly to me. This is quite different than having laws enforcing 'equality'. If I fail to obide by such laws I would be fined. If I don't pay the fine, they might fine me again, s…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:52 PM
1

You've changed the wording, introduced two new entities, the "community" and "the government" and obfuscated the source of the force, but the effect is the same. You're forcing me to sell things to you that I don't want to sell. You're telling me who I can or cannot do business with on my own property.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:41 PM
-5

You're basically saying that a person's ingrained sexuality is as fickle as a leaf in the wind. Not quite. I'm saying that it's susceptible to outside incentives. I'm not making any statements about how susceptible it is.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:13 PM
-12

Let's say I raised the price of potatoes by 1 cent. Fewer people would buy them due to the higher price. But if you asked those people who didn't buy potatoes, they wouldn't say they didn't buy them because the price went up. It's a subconscious effect. Same thing here. If MtF was less attractive because women were less privileged, you'd have fewer MtF.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:59 PM
12

The softer sciences have much more potential for abuse, which is why feminism was able to infest them so quickly.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:47 PM
7

Not just anti-science, but anti-reality. Feminism, like most other anti-empirical belief systems (cough religion cough), will be destroyed by the scientific progress. The thing about anti-reality propaganda is you need a constant stream of it otherwise the people affected by it will see the contradictions. Just like with religion where you have to emotionally bully the kid pretty much constantly since birth to make sure they don't have an ounce of independent thought.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:42 PM
3

The only trolls here are you and manzboobz.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:09 PM
2

...what?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:00 PM
14

No matter what game developers do, these women (some of whom are feminists) will never be satisfied, and will raise a shitstorm about "sexism" in games. Do you know what happens when one person constantly criticizes the other in a relationship to a point where the abused is driven to inaction for the fear of doing something wrong? I can't see this having a positive effect on gaming.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:53 PM
4

You're such a troll.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:50 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSaT9utl4Ys Here's what GWW has to say about this little.. shrimp?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:43 PM
-5

Firstly, studies are showing that transsexual people actually have different brain structures from cisgender people, Good! Even though the study has low n and was done on brain scans of dead people, maybe it identifies the brain area causing a male to believe they're female and vice versa.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:23 PM
26

I worry more about their screeching having an effect on game development. Now game developers will have to worry whether female characters are "underrepresented" or "stereotyped" or "objectified" in their games, whatever the fuck that means.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:11 PM
0

You've been linked from /r/againstmensrights. (Check it out for a laugh)
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:06 PM
-11

I never said it was fake. The disorder is very real. I merely disagree on the nature of it.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:04 PM
21

Just another way for the government to grab power from a position of moral superiority. The average person has absolutely no clue how common sex trafficking is, so any numbers given to them they will lap right up. As the drug war wanes they're trying to find new "wars" to fight, the more nebulous and ill-defined, the better.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:01 PM
26

I can't remember last time I got mad, but this.. this makes my blood boil.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:54 PM
-10

And they criticise those studies, that's the point, they're saying in that report, "The studies that have come before us are flawed, the number of trans people is much higher." It seems like a nice way to massage the number to get the results that they want. Why is there such a denial of the mismatch between MtF and FtM trans people? So here's the real point at play here, what determines if you are male or female? It's a combination of your brain, hormones, external features, size, body shape.. …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:52 PM
-11

I don't know. Firstly, according to Wikipedia the percentage is around 35% Way to misrepresent it. The numbers on that wikipedia page is 38% bisexual, 35% attracted to women, and 27% attracted to men. So 73% of trans women are sexually attracted to women. Ok, they're not pure lesbians, but that's how I remembered the numbers. Compare that to the general population. You have 3% of lesbians and maybe 2% more of bi women at best. The numbers for trans women are ten times higher! I use that as evide…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:38 PM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuCS7EMMRtk What he did was legal. Even the game warden approved it on the spot. He wants to be a dive instructor, but now after this ridiculous outrage several schools told him he is no longer welcome there. Morally I see no problem with his actions either. I see no moral qualms about killing an animal.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:07 PM
-17

A trans woman who is a lesbian is just as real a lesbian as a cis woman who is a trans woman EDIT lesbian, sorry for the typo. Why are like 80% of trans women lesbians? Maybe I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body too? Edit edit: Also, I'd appreciate some evidence that there are more trans women than trans men, because if that isn't the case your entire point is moot. The ratio is like 10 to 1. Look it up.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:54 PM
-11

Both of these assertions boil down to the "trans people transition for privilege" That's not what I'm saying at all. See my other posts in the thread.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:50 PM
4

I believe she poked the wasp nest of freethoughtblogs and atheism+. She's the misogyny girl for disagreeing with them.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:37 PM
5

This is why democracy is fundamentally broken. The candidate who wins is the one who promises the most entitlements and Obamaphones to voters, corporations and special interest groups.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:26 PM
1

poor parents are more likely to have poor children? Yes. Is this going somewhere? You are free to help these 'disadvantaged' if you wish. Would you extend to me the same freedom? There has never, throughout the entire history of the human race, been a time when charity has been enough to meet the needs of the disadvantaged so I am wondering what you are basing this on. In the 50s and 60s poverty was on the decline. When government put in the welfare programs the trend reversed. We now have a HUG…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:58 PM
9

The man is lazy and watching TV while the moms hear the psychic call and "will always come through."
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:12 PM
9

Misogyny!
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:47 PM
1

Do you believe that such disadvantages are compounded from generation to generation? I see improvements in the standard of living in society across the board for all classes. So, no, I don't believe it does. Assuming I even agree with your definition of a disadvantaged class, we see a regression to the mean rather than some runaway accumulation of privilege/disadvantage. Do you believe that some people would not die and suffer without protection Without government protection, bailouts and interf…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:39 PM
2

This goes to show that no matter how stiff the penalties are some people will refuse to comply with something they feel is morally wrong. If those dads were allowed to be involved in their kids' lives they would be less reluctant to pay child support.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:13 PM
21

It's true that there's widespread prejudice and bias in our legal system, but it sure as hell isn't against women. (The stats for the US aren't much different)
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:05 PM
1

Do you agree that this is a disadvantaged position, at the most basic level? So, if I have something you want, and I refuse to sell it to you, but not to others, does that disadvantage you? Sure. But one has to ask why I'm unwilling to make a transaction that would benefit us both. And how that would impact my standing in the community. Would people decide to boycott my store if I stopped selling to blacks? They might even break my windows at night to retaliate. It might even drive me out of bus…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:58 PM
-14

I thought only rad-fems were dumb enough to believe that trans had all kind of special privileges. You're arguing against a strawman here. I never said trans people are privileged. I said the class they wish to transition into (females) is privileged. If females were underprivileged, there would be fewer MtFs.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:38 PM
-18

I think if you're going to argue that an appreciable number of people are trans because they feel they can gain privileges that way, the burden is on you to show this effect rather than on anybody else to show that it doesn't exist. You're misrepresenting my position here. I never claimed there was "an appreciable number of people" who are influenced to become trans because of female privilege. I'm stating that there is an effect. I do not know its size, but it's a simple praxeological truth tha…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:34 PM
1

Driving to another town to pick up a prescription or ordering online (of course this only applies to medicine for issues that are not of immediate concern) is like expecting people to move to another town or rely on charity, the only difference is a matter of scope. The end result is the same in kind if not severity. So you think you have the right to force me to sell you something just because you can't be inconvenienced to get it from elsewhere? If you don't want to sell me something, such as …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:22 PM
8

Ah, another area where men's rights are needed. If you were to admit your big dick is causing you problems in a relationship, everyone would laugh at you.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:15 PM
-33

I'm not saying it affects the conscious decision process, but you can't say it has no effect either. For example, when mandatory seatbelt laws were put in place, people started driving more recklessly and get into more accidents. We saw an increase in the number of accidents but a decrease in their severity. People weren't consciously driving more recklessly, but on some subconscious level they understood that they're safer while wearing a seatbelt so they took more risks. Edit: Let's make the e…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:02 PM
4

More like that: http://www.penisland.net http://www.therapist.com
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:52 AM
-59

There's a certain type of radical feminist that considers trans women to be men trying to sneak their way into the enemy camp. There's a grain of truth to that. If women didn't have all the special privileges there would be fewer MtFs. Basically these rad-fems don't want men cashing in on their privilege. Edit: Hi, /r/againstmensrights! Don't touch the poop.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:47 AM
1

I didn't say that. I said that the two didn't care; not enough to start a new pharmacy to compete with the racist one and not enough to drive sufficient traffic towards one if it was started. Why can't they order the drugs from the internet or through the phone or drive to a pharmacy in a nearby town? Do you believe that some people would not die and suffer without protection, do you believe that they should die or do you believe that it doesn't matter if they die? Is this supposed to be one of …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:38 AM
1

And then what happens when the only pharmacy in a racist town refuses to sell medicine to the few black families in the town and no one gives a shit? So, let me get this straight. There's a few black families in a completely racist town. The pharmacy is racist and won't sell them medicine. And the whole town is racist, so they won't buy the medicine and sell/give it to the black families. I guess my first question is what is a black family doing in a town that seems to be the KKK capital that wa…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:44 AM
1

Not quite, but we all do pay for those on welfare to have more kids. Yeah, we incentivize drug addicted single mothers to have more kids to get more money out of the government to pay for their habit. This is how we fight the "war on drugs."
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:59 AM
-2

One could say it provides negative value because of all the misinformation it stuff into their brain.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:56 AM
3

They all major in women's studies, saturating the market and then complain they're not making as much as the menz? But what about equality????
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:09 AM
3

Ah, you should've said you were a communist. It would've saved us some time. I believe I have rights to my property. And you believe you have rights to my property too. I'm glad we got to the bottom of this. As long as we're all clear on what our beliefs are.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:01 AM
3

You can't deny someone something that you do not deny others. If you give someone a gift, you are denying it to everyone else. Under your rule I would have to give it to every person on the planet. If I choose to have sex with one person, I must offer it to everyone else too? The general requirement for equality must weigh higher than the requirement for a single shop keeper to maximize his profit, since the principle of equality is of interest to all people. Then the shopkeeper must give all hi…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:49 AM
6

Equality is our goal. Todays dream is tomorrows reality. Equality is a marxist pipe dream. It's unattainable. Every human being is different in millions of different ways. Equality in the sense of both should have the same rights and responsibilities and be held to the same standards then yes, they are equal. As a man, someone forgot to give me my right of giving birth to a child. The president of the united states doesn't have the same responsibilities as a grocery store clerk. If you hire a ha…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:44 AM
2

I claim that I can sell my things to anyone I wish. You claim that you have the right to force me to sell to people with whom I do not wish to do business. You call this your 'right'. How can you justify forcing me to do such things?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:27 AM
30

I guess the obvious question is if your professor knew all this why was she intentionally spreading misinformation? It's one thing to do it out of ignorance, but it's entirely different to intentionally mislead students.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:15 AM
2

A man and a woman aren't the same. They have different genitals, different hormone levels, different wights and sizes and different muscle distribution. Different brains, too. Not the mention individual variability. How can you pretend they're the same?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:08 AM
8

Principle of equal treatment? Did you just make that up?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:56 PM
5

Yes, that's exactly what it would mean. Every business would have the freedom to decide who it chooses to do business with. None of what you said is an argument against such freedom.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:45 PM
13

Discrimination happens, but it's not only good, but necessary. Men and women aren't equal. Equality is a leftist dream. The sooner you understand that the happier you'll be. Businesses should be free to decide how to maximize their profits. If they want to admit women but not men, that's their choice. Only mixed groups? That's fine too. Only men? No problem. The reason you're upset is your expectations didn't match reality.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:52 PM
2

The government will institute a bachelor tax and breeding incentives like they already have in some European countries. We already have it too -- it's called welfare.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:43 PM
12

Men like women. Men love women. Men want and love kids as well. But the state makes it so incredibly risky for a man to go through with marriage. It incentivizes women to divorce by showering them with cash and prizes such as child support, alimony, kids, and the house. And women do. They file for divorce in 70% of divorces and according to surveys divorce is their idea in 90% of cases (that means in 20% of cases women want divorce and get the man to file for it). Frankly I'm surprised as many m…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:36 PM
3

For a long time I was puzzled over Manzboobz but I think I finally understand. It's Futrelle's "plausible deniability" account. He comes on here to keep abreast of what's going on in MR for his manboobz blog, and at the same time to get the feminist hate out of his system. He hates them as much as we do, probably even more since they post hundreds of inane comments on each of his blog posts. I'm pretty he doesn't mean any of the stuff he writes at manboobz -- he is, or was?, a professional journ…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:22 PM
1

Such posts get like 300+ upvotes. It's ridiculous, but not surprising at all. I don't bother trying to 'fix' this as there's nothing to be done. Just let them upvote those vacuous posts to get it out of their system. Eventually they will get tired of them and stop downvoting. Hopefully.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:07 PM
19

By the end of it, we were both appalled. How was there not more outrage over this movie (or did most people have the good sense to avoid seeing it)? There would be outrage if those boys were girls. Male disposability, there's no empathy toward men, yada yada yada.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:37 PM
5

I wish I could see women as a gay man sees them. Unfortunately my view of the opposite sex is forever clouded by sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:52 PM
20

Start documenting everything. This is one of those things they will just brush off until you have enough documented evidence. Meanwhile keep those complaints coming to your direct superviser and HR. Document all communication, too. So, let's say another month goes by, you document everything, and still nothing is done? The HR person you talked to has a boss. Find their contact info and contact her. Keep documenting all of it. And if nothing is done? Maybe look into getting a lawyer? Some lawyers…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:32 PM
7

There are very few women on actual combat duty. Everything is done to keep them out of it. The women who go into the army choose to do so out of their own free will. Not so for men. These men, boys, are brainwashed with ideals of honor, duty, courage, and pushed into it by their parents before they are even old enough to vote. That's the real tragedy.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:57 PM
14

You have to admit, there seems to be a lack of qualified applicants. You can say the same about the men.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter