TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InvestigatorFull1364 Archive

View 15 posts and 68 comments by InvestigatorFull1364 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction28/10/25 08:59 PM
14

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction21/11/25 05:16 PM
12

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction25/10/25 08:05 PM
10

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction11/12/25 01:03 PM
10

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction03/11/25 05:52 PM
8

Edu./Occu.InvestigatorFull1364/r/MensRights02/09/25 09:58 PM
7

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction23/08/25 01:24 AM
6

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction15/11/25 10:30 AM
5

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction17/11/25 05:19 PM
5

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction07/11/25 09:00 PM
4

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction29/11/25 01:55 AM
2

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction06/12/25 08:59 AM
1

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction16/11/25 05:10 PM
0

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction20/12/25 10:07 AM
0

Fundamentals InvestigatorFull1364/r/seduction27/12/25 08:18 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Some people need to hear this, especially beginners that are usually lost. Its good that it reads intuitive to you. But this is not the case for everybody
/r/seduction27/12/25 08:55 AM
-5

I am using the definitions as intended. When i talk about Beta behaviour here, I do mean giving value to the girl unreciprocated. What people would normally call anti-seductive behaviour. I am not advocating for it blindly. It is a nuanced concept, but I believe it has its place. Its goal is to make the interaction more humane, calibrated and smooth. At a high level it can be described as "letting the girl catch up to you". I have seen way too many people try to apply Seduction concepts blindly …
/r/seduction27/12/25 08:42 AM
1

There are two possible scenarios here: Either the person judging is objectively wrong The person being judged deserves it For point 1, it usually boils down to people engaging in lose-lose situations (social wise). Maybe they have their reasons (work burn out, life situation). From the point of view of your Agency, you best ignore it, assuming you have the trained presence of mind to spot it. For point 2, it boils down to power dynamics in the group and it can be analyzed quite accurately, refer…
/r/seduction20/12/25 07:28 PM
1

You read this totally wrong friend
/r/seduction20/12/25 12:56 PM
2

Give her the chance to reject you before you go home. Unless you are in a culture where PDAs are shunned upon, you have no business bringing them home before it is time for sexual escalation.
/r/seduction18/12/25 03:52 PM
2

Attraction is built from rapport breaking. Essentially the push when people expect the pull. Not aimless push, not constant push (you need to set expectations before you break them) From neuroscience laugh itself is solved as a mechanism. Humans and monkeys laugh to indicate “we are playing now”, i.e. the situation itself has more meaning than face value. This part can help you calibrate what “push” is good and what is not
/r/seduction16/12/25 07:44 PM
114

For the love of good, do screen them, but not like this. You should be able with a bare minimum of calibration to assess the dates from the interaction itself (when you meet her). This is a fake projection of power. You are falsely projecting “control” over the dating process while you have none. Going on a date with a timewaster is a probabilistic risk of your prior knowledge and assumption of the situation. If you end up with many timewasters… you screw up somewhere earlier
/r/seduction16/12/25 07:38 PM
1

Do you need a bazooka to kill a fly? People have gotten laid with non of these. If you wanna do them, do them as their own ends and as a result of self respect. You are already sabotaging yourself by building in wrong foundations. For example if you ever have a revulsion phase (for a bad string of rejections for example). Your foundation (girls -> improvement) will turn to (bitches -> improvement) to (who cares -> improvement) to (give up). Sounds extreme? Probably more likely scenario than you …
/r/seduction16/12/25 07:33 PM
1

If it helps you understand this, “Love”, “dating” and “hook ups” are processed in different parts of the brain. Love is oxytocin based, dating is dopamine based and sex is primordial lust (reptilian brain). Literally, the girl you hook up is a entity than the girl you love. They are not incongruent, you can love one while you hook up with another. So in short, your “hook up” has nothing to do with your ex… unless you explicitly do so by your own action. And here is where you need to police yours…
/r/seduction16/12/25 07:28 PM
1

i think you havent defined what inner game is. it is these things essentially: It is the ability to withstand adversity The ability to project your Being into the world The ability to reinvent yourself The ability to charter your course (source: http://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/11/14/the-pillars-of-daygame/ ) Take a look at all the issues you mentioned and probably fall into one of these categories. The dirty secret of the community is that inner game gets better through success. Not fail…
/r/seduction16/12/25 04:57 PM
2

Assertions are usually better in the cold, but by a lower margin than you might think (after discounting flakes) If you are set at doing this at your work (which again, i would urge you to reconsider). Here would be some micro calibrations worth considering: yes, sweetening the ask is good, because it acknowledges the social setting employee-customer (social intelligence) Considering to go for the number exchange without a date request (coffee, drinks, dinner)... I would not call it unthinkable.…
/r/seduction15/12/25 07:52 PM
1

99% is not recommended. You are risking too much if things turn bad (now or in the future), for little gain. The advice you point works when you can walk out if things turn bad, not in your case (especially since you are working in health services). Now onto the advice itself: 1) Numbers do work out, ask any Daygamer out there. 2) You should lead sure, but soft power leadership is more effective imo. Calibration + Charisma + Frame control, lead better than hard stating your intent. 3) In particu…
/r/seduction15/12/25 07:27 PM
1

Abundance mindset is a lie in this interpretation. What you are looking for is "Courage", i.e. to feel ok with what the future holds regardless of outcome. At the end of the day, isn't that what "abundance mindset" aims to achieve, convince you that the future is ok, because you will have more opportunities. But... it is too broad of advice. All social skills are context driven. So a behaviour that is acceptable now, can be uncalibrated later, this goes for confidence, courage, and the mindset y…
/r/seduction15/12/25 06:46 PM
2

I quote an article to pinpoint exactly what you are missing: "Let’s take a look. We all have a chode friend. He goes out one day, gets drunk, finds another drunk girl, and scores a one-night stand. Nice, success! But… something is missing. What is missing is replicability; what he did is not systematised and cannot be repeated with confidence. Our friend in question is susceptible to the whims of luck both in acquisition, finding his one-night stand, and his retention, maintaining and keeping th…
/r/seduction15/12/25 05:13 PM
1

depends on where you are with the girl. Hand-holding, hugging, kissing, ... anything goes. Just give her the option to reject your advances. Her decisions speaks volumes
/r/seduction15/12/25 05:04 PM
2

You are opening the wrong girls or you need a break. If you are not getting success, you certainly cannot consider the break yet. Your aversion is a veil effort from your Ego to make you stop approaching (… and the pain of rejection) This leaves us with you opening the wrong girls. Pick up is exciting enough that reciprocation from a high quality girl will always make you feel good. It releases all the happy chemicals: dopamine, serotonin and oxytocin. To miss this excitement you are not opening…
/r/seduction14/12/25 05:52 PM
3

If in doubt escalate. That remains the only true reason to learn where you stand with the girl
/r/seduction14/12/25 05:46 PM
1

Imo all Daygame SDLs in retrospect look easy. We met, and after 1-2 hours we started fucking. Living through them is an entirely different story.
/r/seduction14/12/25 08:16 AM
1

What you call rejection usually manifests as AA. Here are the mechanics of AA: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/05/02/approach-anxiety-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/ And here is the whole interplay of rejection and why most online advice is BS: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-stop/
/r/seduction12/12/25 07:28 AM
1

i think only mastery, infinite and balls deep are the "overpriced" ones. The others are fair vfm. And tbf, mastery popularized daygame, it did carry its weight (just to play devils advocate)
/r/seduction11/12/25 04:06 PM
2

Availability: The first 4 are on amazon. Bodi's are on his website. Primal seduction is on lulu
/r/seduction11/12/25 01:09 PM
2

A lay per 30-60 approaches is advanced. As a beginner, expect no success for a long time. But dont sweat about it, once it clicks it is very worth it. Here is the journey summarized: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/11/07/how-to-get-laid-with-daygame/ And here is the mentality of approaching: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-stop/
/r/seduction06/12/25 02:32 PM
0

Becuase that frame is fatalistic and hand wavy. What we actually see in Daygame is progression and results improvement. There is a marketplace behind everything but our positions are not static. To elevate our positions means also elevating our Inner Game. That comes from deep social understanding integrated with out emotions. It is not magic juju, that is what I try to achieve with the article
/r/seduction20/11/25 11:09 AM
-5

you read it quite fast my friend. Reading time is about 5-6 mins. You breezed through it in 2.
/r/seduction15/11/25 10:35 AM
2

Lets dissect it. Excuse me, sorry: these are ok to make her stop. Not afterwards. Also let her stop before rolling out the opener. Like completely stop and paying attention to you. Stopping and opening are too different things Compliment part (you look nice): this is standard daygame opener. But… the value is not on the opener. It is more an acknowledgement of the seduction frame. You are in the clear, you can keep using this. Just stack afterwards Everything else: unnecessary to damaging. You d…
/r/seduction09/11/25 08:57 AM
1

Once you open, you need a structure for in-set work. Basically, it is running the set
/r/seduction08/11/25 01:40 PM
2

Here is my inner game guide for daygame (bird’s eye view): https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/11/07/how-to-get-laid-with-daygame/ Here is an inner game guide for the approach part itself: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-stop/ Here is one about approach anxiety: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/05/02/approach-anxiety-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/ All for daygame though
/r/seduction08/11/25 05:10 AM
11

You shouldn’t be getting much shit post sex. If she is playing games after sex seriously consider bailing out, something is really wrong with her. The most important thing to realise is that you hold all the cards and she is bluffing: - Girls get more attached post sex, not guys - You got your notch, you can call it a day anytime - the woman’s mating strategy fundamentally leans more into LTRs, not the man’s You can seriously go cold on them and consider if they have a mental issue when doing su…
/r/seduction05/11/25 02:31 PM
5

Brooo this chick has massive tits and has blocked me on insta. How do i approach her so she likes me bro ?
/r/seduction03/11/25 08:02 PM
1

He is probably exaggerating. Its up to the player to gauge sexual interest, especially for some cultures things tend slower. Not that what he claims is not a real concern, the faster the lay the better obviously
/r/seduction29/10/25 02:30 AM
2

Depends on that type of Game, but not more than a “session”. Eventually for advanced game you will want to deviate to stateless Game though. Of course your results are better when you hit state, it is just inconsistent to achieve that or a pain in the ass to do so. Usually, it has a large volume of approaches in short time as prerequisite as well. The alternative is stateless Game where you don’t try to hide or elevate your mood. Your Game is flexible enough to match your mood. We win points of …
/r/seduction28/10/25 09:17 PM
2

On the practical side: You should actually feel better when there are people around. The girl will be more at ease and the whole thing will be easier. Now ideally your approach should be strong enough to make her stop whatever she was doing, but under no means you should be actually getting attention from the surroundings. This is way easier than it sounds, just talk normally and you will be ok. As for the inner workings of AA here: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/05/02/approach-anxiety…
/r/seduction28/10/25 11:25 AM
1

Surprisingly Bronze age mindset by bronze age pervert is the best mindset book i have read. The point is to understand that the book is incredibly deep beyond its simplistic facade Also not a mindset book per se, but a very good book in understanding the male place into the world is “Women and power in history” by Amaury de Riencourt
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:35 PM
1

The vaccination is most effective for teenagers and only covers 3 variations to my knowledge. As with any STD it is the chance of the other person having it multiplied with the probability of contracting it. So for sure you can get away with things. But to my eyes this is an unnecessary risk. Unless the girl really demands it is also entirely voluntary. If she demands it things get sketchy, but Game should provide us the option to decline and not just accept from scarcity. As long as people are …
/r/seduction25/10/25 09:11 PM
15

Actually doing that is among the most dangerous things you can do in terms of STDs. Estimates for warts, i.e. HPV (the thing that can cause throat cancer) are all over the place, from 10-80% of sexually active population. Herpes estimates range about 64% for people under 50 and once you have it you marry it for life. The virus is actually smart enough to increase your stress levels so it can induce outbreaks. Eventually there is even risk to migrate to the trigeminal nerve (men only). The pain t…
/r/seduction25/10/25 08:26 PM
1

Wise old Krauser had said that running away from internal demons is a prerequisite for mastering Daygame. Simply put, and i swear by this, for a nobody, emphasis on the nobody (not your few random lays a year guy) to actually become good at cold approach pickup you have to have no other options. In your head it is this or eternal celibacy. It even gets worse, it is not that you just spam approaching in the beginning. It is that most people lack calibration, so they are literally fools running ar…
/r/seduction06/09/25 11:33 PM
1

The order goes like this (from what i have seen done in Greece): First you need a good group of guys that are on the same page. In the beginning you should give your left nut to get people into your event (ideally a high BT place). You have to use the first event to build up some online presence insta/FB to attract people easier. In the beginning it is really really hard to get people (girls)in the events. You aim for ratios at least 2:1 girls to guys To get said people you should go to random e…
/r/seduction06/09/25 11:22 PM
7

Their natural tendancy is monogamous (short term at least). The idea they dating multiple guys is mostly a modern perversion. It can be true, but at least is not the norm. Maybe more common in the US, but i would bet against it. If you meet her under normal circumstances and you dont have a reason to believe the relation isnt going well, you shouldnt worry. But this predisposes a good objective understanding of your SMV in her eyes
/r/seduction06/09/25 06:30 PM
1

He is risking not learning a skillset and being socially uncalibrated. Even if you feel it doesnt mean anything for his own inner game doing stupid things, it means for the rest of the club. The other girls at the club will unconsciously notice. He already attempts a cold escalation to probe for info. The girl replies by reciprocating or not. He should take the reply at face value.
/r/seduction06/09/25 12:23 PM
12

“When in doubt escalate” holds true. Pretty much the way to distinguish real from fake attraction is to escalate (light touching, handholding or isolate in your case). If she reciprocates you are on the money, if she doesnt they just having fun. Point is to use targeted escalation to probe were you are in the interaction
/r/seduction05/09/25 11:57 PM
7

There is social and sexual hook point. Social is when you turn the cold approach into a chat - then you can get the number. Sexual hook point is when she fancies you. For sexual hook point you need to be .. well, sexual. Proximity, innuendo and heavy flirting (please do it calibrated, dont do this without getting the non verbal ok). You need the first for the second and sometimes you will get the second because the girl fancies you without game. This is why you get numbers that go nowhere. You h…
/r/seduction05/09/25 12:13 AM
4

It’s mentality mostly (after you have internalized the basic skillset). Conviction, state control and vibe - all the non verbals. I strongly believe in game one learns more from successes than from failures. I had a lucky break out at 820ish sets with 3 quality lays in 60 sets and over 4 weeks. After that it was snowballing from there. Dont underplay the strategy of your system. My thoughts on the limiting factors of Daygame are here: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-st…
/r/seduction03/09/25 08:41 PM
18

Yes its worth it. You underplay how much value a girlfriend brings to your life. Even if it was 200 approaches, for a nice girlfriend (lets say a seven) that is easygoing and respects you. Would you reject this deal ? [Personally, i got my first lay past the 400 approach mark] Game has a steep learning curve. If you are talking about daygame expect to not get laid much for the next year, the famous 1000 sets of hell. If it is nightgame pivot early out of dates and numbers. In nightgame you are p…
/r/seduction03/09/25 08:06 PM
1

I will just add that during the learning phase its OK to receive everything as a signal because you are uncalibrated and you need to learn (this doesn’t mean it will work everytime) But of course the real explanation is as reads above
/r/seduction03/09/25 07:59 PM
5

You can go with her suggestion. But … make sure she pays her share. Or go for street food and walk. The problem with dinners is that you cannot escalate over the table
/r/seduction03/09/25 02:30 PM
1

I think the gist of the article is from the second part onwards. The first one is just to give for why we cant live in a Blue Pill/Garden of Eden (Rousseau) style world and just be happy about it.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 09:29 AM
1

Yes, but the point is the version of the social programming. If the premise of the article is true it is claimed to be myth based, cyclical (and hence repeatable) and based on the here and now. Clarity of thought can in theory break this pattern, similar to this sub or red pill over the disney/blue pill narrative.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 09:27 AM
4

First things first, you just started. It is normal to get 1 number in 10 at this point. You won’t be getting laid for a long time. Daygame, contrary to other forms of Game, carries no prior value. You have no social circle to build you up and no club setting to feed girls alchohol. So unless your skills is really good, it is too easy to mess up. This is where the “1000 sets of hell” come from - the learning curve is really steep. Here, daygame is explained with its advantages and limitations as …
/r/seduction03/09/25 08:20 AM
0

It’s a big task, but if you can go through this article, it explains why the Blue Pill is the natural human condition. Sadly no PUA dream, we only got out of it with tremendous effort and dumb luck https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/the-origins-of-blue-pill/
/r/seduction02/09/25 09:46 PM
1

There are 3 billion men on the planet and if she is attractive a good percentage of those will want to bone her. Your real competition are alphas and naturals. This is irrespective of culture and location. Simply by definition a girl being approached by a natural does not feel the same if approached by a Beta and it doesn’t change her reaction even if she was approached 100 times that day.
/r/seduction02/09/25 07:59 AM
1

The girls will like you for who you are. The distinction is that “who you are” is workable through game. If you think your actions and not your “be” attract the girls, that is a really bad frame on the long run
/r/seduction02/09/25 07:56 AM
2

First there is ego and AA. But your post says that you are looking someone to “learn from”. Take a moment and think why would that wing would wanna hang out with you ? Do you also provide something to the relation ? Otherwise it is value taking Finally, there are massive misconceptions of what Game is trying to achieve leading into false hopes and disappointment. Here is an example from daygame https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-stop/
/r/seduction01/09/25 09:06 AM
1

I am analysing it in a vacuum. If this is a positive thing in his (op) area more power to him. But thinking like this reduces seduction to actions (approaching), than character. Ideally girls should like you for who you are, then competition becomes less relevant
/r/seduction01/09/25 09:02 AM
1

It’s a bad strategy even if the sex chat goes well. When invite her out sounds exactly the same as a booty call now. Sure, there is a demographic for that, but the majority of girls prefer covert communication, ambiguity and adventure on the dates. You take out all of that, and her plausible deniability (she knows why she comes out)
/r/seduction01/09/25 01:11 AM
-3

It’s strictly negative. First girls shouldnt engage into overt communication if they are on the seduction frame. Second it takes the value off of him and puts it into the act of approaching
/r/seduction01/09/25 12:28 AM
3

The biggest question is why they are telling you this ? (If you are the one to ask them its a foul) They shouldn’t be giving you overt compliments if you are in the seduction frame. They should be keeping quiet on follower mode. This is pseudo attraction for the simple reason it takes the value off of you and puts it into the act of approaching. To answer your question. Girls get hit on constantly from different strategies. When they say they “didnt got approached” they can be 1) lying 2) didnt …
/r/seduction01/09/25 12:26 AM
1

Others advice is good, but as explained here (albeit, through daygame lens), AA has a point in game. The goal is not to stop your emotions, i.e. stop AA. The goal is to be able to regulate them. https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/05/02/approach-anxiety-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/
/r/seduction31/08/25 10:17 AM
2

Its more about the girl than you. Given the girl has a predisposition for it, with skill you can make it happen Here is a recent example of mine: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/19/athens-sdl-report/
/r/seduction27/08/25 03:19 PM
-1

Learning Daygame, i did about 800 in 5-6 months. After that was based on how much i wanted new girls in my life. Here were my learning stats: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/06/26/learning-daygame/ And here are my current stats: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/06/16/my-2025-daygame-stats-climbing-mount-improbable/
/r/seduction27/08/25 12:28 AM
11

Don’t do phone calls. Headphones is ok, just give her more time to stop and gesture more
/r/seduction26/08/25 09:13 PM
1

This article analyzes things well. Pretty much its the aspects of Daygame limiting results (by design, its ok, we make up for it in other ways as novelty, retention and speed of seduction) and the other is the SMP itself as others have pointed: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-stop/
/r/seduction26/08/25 09:12 PM
3

If you want to redline your skills, you shouldn’t. Do Dutch paying or rounds instead (and make sure she pays). Then she has only one variable for sticking around - how much she likes you. Your charisma/Game/skill then becomes much more measurable and improvable. For short-term results or based on a specific culture by all means, its more socially smart to pay
/r/seduction26/08/25 03:30 AM
2

There are the basics: - Daygame works best in large anonymous cities. Ideally more than 1 million people to be sustainable long run - Mornings have less sets, but more carefree sets - Afternoons have more volume but quality can be worse - if you live in a Uni town, there is seasonality for when the uni is on session I wouldn’t bother with shopkeepers and randoms unless it really suits your personality. Having said that, even in major cities is not uncommon to open 1 set per 30-40 mins. But at th…
/r/seduction25/08/25 10:03 PM
1

The mandatory resource is Krauser’s books: Daygame Mastery and Daygame Infinite. It is much much harder because your inner game must be on point. Simply you wont get results at all until you have decent competence. Hence, the learning curve is brutal. But after your first 1000 it becomes quite efficient Of course i would also promote my own blog: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com
/r/seduction25/08/25 06:41 PM
4

Cold approach is meeting people in general. Daygame is a strategy using cold approach. Because it happens during daytime and usually on the street, there are nuances unique to it. This would make Daygame quite different from example a cold approach in the club
/r/seduction25/08/25 02:18 PM
0

Speaking from a direct daygame standpoint: - your first 200 you probably cant stand on your feet properly - your first 1000 will give you some form of competency This process comes down to stress. The human brain cannot perform under stress. So when learning to cold approach you should eliminate that first before any “Game”** But bare in mind that Game is about changing your life, from values to behaviour. You cannot half-ass it. To make such seismic life changes you need to both be prepared to …
/r/seduction24/08/25 07:29 PM
1

Not the erotic massage part. But value giving is key to any ecosystem game. It just has to be: 1. Non-targeted (then it is flirting). So give value to the entire group 2. From a place of abundance. Otherwise it is just needy
/r/seduction24/08/25 07:25 PM
1

Always remember that fast escalation is determined by the girl, not by you. Your job is to probe the state of the girl and if she is up for it push things forward. But i will stress that, unless you got extremely lucky, fast lays happen with the lower end of girls you can attract. Simply from SMP principles. Generally, after a makeout, you can safely bounce back - at least with direct daygame. So the requirement in escalation is not that high. To get to said makeout, follow the fundamentals (not…
/r/seduction23/08/25 09:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter