TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LePetitPhagette Archive

View 12 posts and 166 comments by LePetitPhagette on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
583

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 02:33 PM
370

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience17/02/21 11:08 PM
136

LePetitPhagette/r/askTRP06/03/21 12:55 PM
97

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:09 AM
95

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 11:37 AM
93

LePetitPhagette/r/askTRP19/02/21 01:35 PM
90

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:18 PM
77

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience20/02/21 06:21 AM
6

LePetitPhagette/r/askTRP17/03/21 07:44 AM
3

LePetitPhagette/r/askTRP27/01/21 09:18 PM
1

LePetitPhagette/r/BlackPillScience27/01/21 10:51 PM
1

discussionLePetitPhagette/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/21 04:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

It's a disingenuous and lazy tactic used by leftists to shut down their opposition by circumventing their points and attacking the source, similar to how the Far Right will try to dismiss their opposition through accusations of Jewish heritage, communist sympathies, or racial inferiority. In their heads the label should suffice in shutting down your argument. It's politically more convenient to do this than to lend credence to your opposition by actually considering their positions. The goal is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 09:22 PM
1

What are they about?
/r/askTRP17/03/21 07:52 AM
2

Are you going out on weekends? Are you neglecting your friends? I don't know anything about your social circle, and if they lack ambition and doing things well, that's can be a serious indicator that you need to find better circles. Or are they getting at something? Friends are like plants that wither away if you neglect them. Proper balance is key.
/r/askTRP17/03/21 07:26 AM
5

Yeah. There is a lot of casual misandry there, and it is a joke to them. This idea of "punching up" in their minds grants them license to say and do horrible things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 04:16 AM
14

That's a good insight. In the same vein that racists don't care about black victims of black perps, a lot of feminists don't actually care much for male victims of male perps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 04:53 AM
8

If you see enough of these bars which compare our perception of prevalence vs. actual prevalence, you realize that a lot of our fears are overstated, and that a lot of social movements today are predicated on inflating occurrence rates, outright lying, and bullying those who use data to support position that might counter movement growth. A sub like TrollX will literally frame it as though women are risking a real chance of sexual assault and murder every time they step outside. Another example …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 04:49 AM
1

Maintain course and completely disregard this transparent shit test.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 08:13 AM
1

He should maintain course and completely ignore this transparent shit test.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 08:12 AM
4

Social media creates misery by usurping real interactions.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 08:02 AM
8

Move to a commune for a few years. It may kill your career prospects, but the people who live away from all this bullshit live happier, healthier, more meaningful and fulfilling lives.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 06:46 AM
30

Social media is alienating but if you refuse to participate you will be alienated. This is actually a problem, and especially for those who can't regulate their usage and who spend most of their time on it. It's not exactly something you can go cold turkey with. A lot of guys who fall through the cracks do so because of addiction to screens.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 06:43 AM
4

If only that was the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/21 03:37 AM
2

You say it like the two are separate and incapable of being applied simultaneously.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 01:29 AM
0

Get your T levels checked. Consider anabolics--the steroids subreddit is very informative.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 06:02 AM
-1

Drugs and alcohol.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 05:57 AM
3

You laid down the law and it appears to have worked. fuck me or fuck you . If she doesn’t wanna fuck that’s fine but withholding sex from me because she’s mad is a dealbreaker . I then told her to go down on me Generally it's advised not to make demands or give ultimatums, as it tends to detracts from your frame, but it appears to have worked in this case. The next day (today) she initiated sex not once, but twice. (She never ever initiates) I am kinda shocked she initiated twice. I'm guessing y…
/r/askTRP10/03/21 02:04 AM
9

Fucking a friend's fiancee as retaliation isn't the answer, bro.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:53 AM
7

then I borrowed his fiance Sounds like you're not a good friend.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:43 AM
13

The average one doesn't exist. Continue to text the cute one.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:34 AM
1

Favors up front or bust.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:29 AM
5

I figured you had some kind of size or weight advantage. It would hurt my pride not to fight someone who would go there.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:23 AM
12

If I were riffing on a friend for his sweaty palms and he retaliates with that, I don't know what I'd do. That literally warrants a fight.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:08 AM
2

Some people have to learn the hard way. Others never learn and suffer their entire lives for it.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 01:06 AM
13

then I made fun of his dead mom You escalated a minor border skirmish to a full-blown nuclear exchange.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 12:59 AM
22

Seeing escorts is fine. High value men do it same as the low, and it's more a function of your own libido. Some guys have hot booty calls in the area, readily available, and on speed dial, but that isn't always the case. And past a certain age it's hard to fuck hot twenty-somethings. Telling a girl you're seeing that you've been with escorts is a turn off for them however, and it is inadvisable to do so.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 12:55 AM
1

As to your leading question: no. If you're investing in a woman in the long-term, you should make sure to vet her, make sure she doesn't have any iffy past, and continue to surveil as a personal insurance strategy. You also need to install safeguards like a prenup and a secret apartment.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 12:50 AM
6

Looks are the opener. Money does matter, everything else being equal. She's likelier to put out in a penthouse apartment than a basement apartment. She's likelier to put out if you bring her home in a Porsche instead of a Camry.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/21 12:18 AM
1

For example, right now one of my plates is super fun. Sex is good and she does all the extra stuff like brings me food or cleans whenever I am in the bathroom or something. She is also active too and it’s fun to go on hikes/runs/climbing with her. But even if I have fun on these non-sexual dates, I still feel frustrated by the thoughts I listed above. Why stop? You're having fun with a friend that you happen to have sex with occasionally. Don't preoccupy yourself with the other guys she's with b…
/r/askTRP10/03/21 12:11 AM
3

Shaming, coercion, and spreading falsehoods. Whether they're intentionally lying or just incapable of grasping truth is hard to gauge, but they simply don't deal with reality and it shows to any thinking male. They will always be threatened by male spaces, men's advocacy, and men advising other men. That's why they're trying to topple frats. Since institutions of power are on their side, any sort of retaliation with go poorly, so it's best to just ignore them while remaining the last bastions fo…
/r/askTRP10/03/21 12:05 AM
2

Even before the incel phenomenon they'd mischaracterize RP as rape advocacy or whatever. Expecting an honest appraisal from them is foolish because these people aren't honest themselves.
/r/askTRP10/03/21 12:00 AM
12

Lately my LTR of two years has been putting this significantly old man on a pedestal (they had sex before she met me before) Because she's fucking him or psyching herself up to do so. He's an ex that she's fixated on. Bad sign and you should have at least considered exiting at this point. I communicated to her that she is obsessed and that I can really be with someone like her anymore This comes off as pathetic. We left on a cold note yesterday and I didn’t reply to her messages all day because …
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:42 PM
24

This is why I advocate periodic snooping, irrespective of whether you're suspicious, as part of a long-term insurance strategy. She denies that she ever acted on it and it was all for fun and that she never acted on it. All for fun? They dig their own graves without even realizing. She is crying and apologizing saying it was a stupid decision and in her past. This behavior is so typical. She also said we were not together so it's none of my business, but at the same time we started dating 1 mont…
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:27 PM
1

I know what a lot of the comments are going to say. You have oneitis, spin plates, get over yourself, etc. This is only said for relationships that obviously won't pan out or amount to anything. Or when interest is unreciprocated. This is that; it's a relationship with what appears to be a quality woman, and those are exceedingly rare. You know you have to let her go. Sucks that external circumstances are leaving you with little choice. Marrying her due to outside pressures is a no-go like you s…
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:20 PM
2

I agree. It needs to be calculated and done sparingly.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:10 PM
1

And he only exists when she needs him. Both intend to use each other but only one does it successfully. OP needs to stop running back like an attention-starved puppy whenever she deigns to notice him.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:08 PM
1

India and Pakistan are part of South Asia, not the Middle East. They are heavily mongrelized Indo-Europeans. Iraq is mostly Arab and therefore Semitic. Iran is Persian, so Indo-European, but they are heavily mixed with Arabs. Afghanistan is mostly Pashtun, who are boy-fuckers, but they too are Indo-European, like the Persians.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:05 PM
0

More than a week.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:56 AM
1

Middle Easterners are mostly Semitic.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:55 AM
1

Getting her name wrong either communicates disinterest or, if it's transparent, that you're a disingenuous tryhard. hah srry I'm awful with names but extremely good with faces. How've you been? Let's meet up next week and get a Drink or something You communicated your interest in hooking up immediately after getting her name wrong without actually catching up in between. I would have held off, though that too may not have succeeded.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:49 AM
1

Shoot your shot. Just don't fixate and always be on the prowl.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:38 AM
1

It's similar to how the childfree subreddit is always complaining about children and pregnancy. The people enjoying an existence without children aren't dedicated to disparaging children and those that have them. Guys who aren't going out of there way to pursue women but are rather dedicated to work, friends, and hobbies probably aren't on that subreddit.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:33 AM
2

A girl's interest fizzles out if it isn't reciprocated. Immediate interest tends to have the same failure rate as expressing no interest at all. There's a sweet spot where you pounce, and if you miss it you miss it. This impulse to want something that was previously available is natural. She no longer can function as an ego booster, but you should trust that initial lack of attraction towards her because that is how you feel about her without the bias of the present.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:16 AM
3

see how she is and how my fwb reacts to the situation How your fwb reacts is completely immaterial. You should neither parade this new girl around nor should you make any special effort to conceal her. If word gets back to your fwb, then whatever. This is for you. You're fixating on one girl and the best way to stop doing that is by seeing other girls. In order to stop thinking about something—anything—you don't do it by trying not to think about it. You do it by preoccupying yourself with somet…
/r/askTRP09/03/21 11:03 AM
4

This is tough. Loser friends tend to hold you down, inadvertently or intentionally. Sometimes, you're the loser friend though, and to be abandoned at such a low would really suck. I see three options: Drop him entirely Don't go out to bars with him Tell him that you won't go out with him if he acts like that again
/r/askTRP09/03/21 10:58 AM
1

It can already be over. For whatever reason, the last time you hooked up could have been the last. So what? You should be able to walk away with little to no muss. She was never yours. You're only fixated on her because of scarcity, which you should change. Go out and bring a different girl home if only to do away with this possessive mentality you have.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 10:49 AM
7

Women shouldn't be top priority. Sometimes I wonder if I'm allowed to say this here. On the one hand the pursuit of women provides an incentive for guys to improve themselves and bust their asses at their careers. On the other, we spend so much time doing things solely for that endeavor that we'd probably be on Mars by now if guys just started reproducing asexually.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 10:43 AM
7

you can be vulnerable with your WIFE This is a turn off to wives as well.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 10:38 AM
2

Personally I just don’t want her to sleep around and I don’t know how to handle it if that happens to be the case She's a fwb. You should already assume that's the case and you shouldn't care. Unless you're exclusive with a girl or you plan to be exclusive with her, her sex life shouldn't concern you. The point of a fwb is that you aren't exclusive, so don't get fixated on her. If she tries to interfere with you see other people, dump her on principle.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 10:35 AM
3

So what do I do in this situation . Tell her to look else where when she’s begging me for help and I like her ? . Then ofc , after that week she’s gone cold , completely different person , I’ve known this person for a while now and she’s gone cold on me before So you only exist when she needs a problem solved? This is a math problem completely written out and all you need to do is compute the answer.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 10:29 AM
2

I doubt that this is the case as a general rule, and even if it is, you shouldn't chase pussy at the expense of professional success. Get a bachelor pad, fill it with nice things: art, books, an entertainment suite, etc.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 02:34 AM
-5

OP should shoot his shot. The risk of physical retaliation from the husband is minimal, and he's probably getting his own side action anyways.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 12:36 AM
5

OP has been presented with an opportunity to fulfill a fantasy we had as preteens but that we forgot we had. It would be sinful not to accept this bounty from God. Remember Lot.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 12:27 AM
6

The Ottoman Sultans knew how to live.
/r/askTRP09/03/21 12:25 AM
7

I feel like normal girls would have actually blocked me and kicked me out of their life full stop... What have I gotten into? These are normal girls. Consider organizing team-building exercises which involve all three of you.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 10:20 PM
1

You should be using minoxidil and retinoids.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 10:15 PM
3

This dynamic seems quasi-incestuous and unhealthy, but who am I to argue with results?
/r/askTRP08/03/21 10:14 PM
1

For your sake I hope you only communicate like this on reddit. Good on you for not getting jealous, but it niggling at the psyche can happen to the best of us. I'm not saying he didn't overstep, and if he does it again you can drop him. I'm saying you shouldn't throw away a longterm friendship over something very minor in the grand scheme of things.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 08:10 AM
3

She's a single mom with three kids and probably as many baby daddies. She doesn't win. OP loses for caring that much about her. He lost again when he made this post.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 07:33 AM
2

Hard disagree. It depends on how far you go back with this guy, but I wouldn't throw away a longterm friendship just because he got in the way of you getting laid once. If this was repetitive behavior, that would be far less excusable, but OP said he wasn't RP. He probably wasn't planning on blowing up, but he had been drinking and he was probably hurting. All in all the cost of his infraction was pretty minor, and there were mitigating circumstances. She rejected the friend in favor of OP mid-f…
/r/askTRP08/03/21 07:29 AM
0

If she' s super into you because you yourself are attractive, giving her a pity fuck while pretending you're doing yourself through her eyes can be pretty hot.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 06:14 AM
3

Obsession is never good, but periodically checking to make sure that the girl you're investing time and resources in isn't fucking around isn't that. Not doing so is irresponsible imo.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 06:07 AM
3

I'm pro-snooping as well. If it's a LTR, you occasionally do have to monitor for shenanigans. That said, you should never cohabit or mix finances.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 06:04 AM
-1

BlueChew subscription https://bluechew.com Starts at $20 a month.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 06:02 AM
7

Presentation is half the equation. Grooming: How's your hair? Best haircut for young guys is short and off your forehead which should be bare. You should be getting a haircut every month or month-and-a-half. Do you have unkempt eyebrows? If so, tweeze. Finger rule--keep them nice and tidy. If you have a unibrow, get rid of that shit. No stray hairs above, beneath, or on the sides. This is an excellent age to learn how to tidy them up, and I swear to Christ that women notice. How's your facial ha…
/r/askTRP08/03/21 06:00 AM
1

Define "gay stuff."
/r/askTRP08/03/21 05:34 AM
2

Either her boyfriend/husband's visiting or she went back to her country.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 05:28 AM
1

True brotherhoods are formed in adversity This is literally the purpose of hazing.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 04:17 AM
1

Who starts it? They can't be picked by someone 'worthy. Instead, the beginning members dictate what is good and who is able to join. Sounds pretty lame. Like fraternities, it'll be a core group of guys who establish a set of desirable qualities and then recruit from a large pool of guys whoever fits that. Of course it must be feasible, but restrictions will be loosed if too few guys are eligible and applying.
/r/askTRP07/03/21 06:47 AM
1

People always make jokes about sailors in the Navy fucking each other. In high school we joked that the football players fucking each other. Cops have been riffing on firefighters being flamers for years. But the truth is that these tend to be very masculine men with healthy tendencies and appetites.
/r/askTRP07/03/21 06:20 AM
1

I'm not saying that we should extend membership to them. Just bring them in to mingle and drink.
/r/askTRP07/03/21 05:54 AM
1

Maybe during their forties. The 3-year fitness tests will weed them out.
/r/askTRP07/03/21 03:12 AM
1

Are you trying to pick a fight?
/r/askTRP07/03/21 03:08 AM
25

Certainly a plausible explanation. Alternatively, women with less parters are better capable of picking long-term spouses.
/r/BlackPillScience07/03/21 02:13 AM
2

*riff raff.
/r/askTRP07/03/21 01:41 AM
3

I didn't mean they'd be eligible for membership. Do Fraternities accept the women they allow in their houses?
/r/askTRP07/03/21 01:18 AM
1

Which type does it lean towards more?
/r/askTRP07/03/21 01:16 AM
-2

Fraternal orders usually don't devolve into cliques.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 11:55 PM
2

Country clubs are for old people who golf. This would be something for young, fit, professional college-educated bachelors who net more than six figures a year. Bankers, lawyers, high-end accountants, doctors, etc.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 11:47 PM
3

That's honestly because people don't understand the point of them. Fraternal orders are some of the oldest ways men have been organizing since time immemorial. Men need other men for guidance, career advancement, mentorship, whatever.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 11:41 PM
1

Vets already have their own frats.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 11:24 PM
1

Do they?
/r/askTRP06/03/21 11:20 PM
2

A quorum of dudes. You have periods of recruitment where PNMs mingle with actives. Then you make them run a gauntlet of tests where if they pass, they're in.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 09:38 PM
2

Most guys in positions of power were in fraternities (Fortune 500 CEOs, congress, law, business, etc.).
/r/askTRP06/03/21 09:36 PM
1

It's for brotherhood.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 09:33 PM
1

He's Paraguayan. Since less than one in five of them can speak English, it's probably safe to assume that he pastes into some kind of translator.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 01:34 PM
17

The cheating culture will prevail anyways.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 01:15 PM
-9

That's why you vet.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 01:13 PM
19

The Freemasons are mostly old and married.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 01:10 PM
3

Thoughts of killing her, leaving this place and the people I know forever. This woman isn't worth losing your freedom for. Oneitis is the result of a scarcity mentality. If you're going to creep on her Insta, which I don't recommend, focus on her flaws. Most women gain weight after marriage, so that can be helpful.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 01:05 PM
33

I don't think you understand how little I'd give a shit.
/r/askTRP06/03/21 12:58 PM
3

not black enough I see this a lot with African-Americans, and by African-Americans I mean those with roots going back to slavery. It's not something you see often with the higher functioning children of Nigerian-Americans, though they sometimes too are drawn to things considered "black." Even some girls look at me this way and say they aren’t into guys who aren’t thugs. A lot of introverted black guys will say this. The fact that it's an often repeated trope sometimes leads me to doubt its verac…
/r/askTRP06/03/21 07:59 AM
1

Escorts are a bit more expensive than that.
/r/askTRP01/03/21 04:44 PM
1

Err to the side of slut though.
/r/askTRP01/03/21 12:19 AM
4

Indeed. Keep your responses witty, short, and maintain a 2:3 ratio of replies-to-received messages.
/r/askTRP01/03/21 12:17 AM
2

I have absolutely no intention of ever actually committing to a dedicated relationship with this woman for MANY reasons. Not saying you should but I'm curious about those reasons.
/r/askTRP01/03/21 12:13 AM
61

They don't seem to understand that the thought of them with other dudes isn't attractive.
/r/askTRP28/02/21 11:31 PM
1

n-count is the difference between genuine and lasting attachment vs. fake or short-term attraction.
/r/askTRP28/02/21 03:15 PM
4

That's not Puritanical. It's the literal truth. “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist . women with zero or one previous sex partners before marriage were also least likely to divorce, while those with 10 or more were most likely. These divorce-proof brides are an exclusive crew: By the 2010s, he writes, just 5 percent of new brides were virgins. And just 6 percent of their marriages di…
/r/askTRP28/02/21 03:11 PM
12

Listen boyo. They're the ones God intended us to make our wives. That clinginess is endearing and ensures loyalty.
/r/askTRP28/02/21 12:49 AM
19

A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners (Buss, 2000). Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Be…
/r/BlackPillScience25/02/21 12:14 PM
3

idk
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 09:25 PM
15

This conversation is getting sad. Checking out.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 08:33 PM
14

Wonder why all those guys cheated on you
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 08:23 PM
15

I have to work out for five days a week to land a date in my city. But expecting women to actually take care of themselves is misogyny. You wouldn't hesitate to tell a girl to leave her partner if he didn't take care of himself. Your double standards are outstanding, fatty.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 08:12 PM
15

Science is misogyny. Got it. Go get tied up by your master, fatty.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 08:07 PM
18

Making insinuations about my sex life and now crying about shaming? And those ham hands suggest perennial portliness.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 08:00 PM
13

If you were the alternative...
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 07:56 PM
19

Just because i like being tied up TMI. Jesus. Confine your fetish to your bedroom. I meant someone who's been with a lot of different dudes. i decided to not get involved in monogamous relationships. The comedy writes itself.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 07:52 PM
25

It's a statistically safe bet to assume that someone with your background has had liaisons with those other than your previous primary partners. But if that isn't the case here, kudos. Learn how to take a compliment lol.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 07:41 PM
29

What point do you think I'm trying to make, dumb-dumb? I was commending you for bucking the odds.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 07:29 PM
39

"Master" was your word, not mine. Not everything's misogyny.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 07:27 PM
35

It makes me happy when someone bucks the odds. Assuming your "master" in this post is your husband in this post and that you're not cheating on him.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/21 07:23 PM
3

After all, if you see a snake on the ground you get away from it, you don't stop to examine it and determine if it's venomous first. Eh. My empathy only goes so far. Feminist spaces have always tolerated misandry and this open (and absurd) comparison of men to snakes, where some of us are venomous while others are not is a blatant example of this. The fact that is so highly upvoted with very little dissent (97% upvoted) attests to this even more. She either sucks at selecting the right male comp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/21 06:02 PM
9

Those fears are legitimate. And it will take a lot of men to change it. The vanguardist guys going in first to lead the charge will suffer lies from the media, academics, and will incur the highest number of casualties in regards to their social and professional lives. But that trickle can become a stream if they set a good example for others like myself who are less courageous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/21 05:56 PM
3

This article covers a new UK study showing amongst other things that about 7% of UK children have attempted suicide by age 17. This is incredibly high.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/21 05:27 PM
0

I’m saving my ass virginity for someone special.
/r/askTRP20/02/21 08:43 AM
11

Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.537 . Edited for the sake of brevity. Excerpts in full can be found in the source. While they were edited to fit the 300 character count, none of the meaning was substantially…
/r/BlackPillScience20/02/21 06:23 AM
3

Sociosexual orientation is stable as well. That’s the cause of high lifetime partners and extra-pair copulations. Evolutionary personality psychologists classify men and women on sociosexual orientation between the extremes of unrestricted and restricted. Relative to sociosexually restricted individuals, sociosexually unrestricted individuals are more likely to: 1) engage in sex at an earlier point in their relationships; 2) engage in sex with more than one partner at a time; and 3) be involved …
/r/BlackPillScience20/02/21 06:18 AM
9

That makes you an insecure incel.
/r/BlackPillScience20/02/21 06:15 AM
29

I don’t disagree with that at all. I didn’t assemble these excerpts with the intention or even desire to change women’s behavior. I only put this together for male consumption and specifically the types of guys who would desire to see this information if they knew it was out there. It’s not for guys who desire some sort of open relationship. It’s for guys who want a long-term, sexually exclusive and stable relationship with someone who isn’t likely to be unfaithful. Guys who express preference a…
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 11:46 PM
5

If only to keep my life from being ruined.
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 10:40 PM
4

It’s less than 10%, and it levels out at around 50±5%. There’s negligible difference between 25 and 40, for example. [A]pproximately half of women in the top quintiles of sociosexuality [def. willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship] had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do …
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 08:00 PM
1

I just want good conversation.
/r/askTRP19/02/21 07:40 PM
10

Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Between the Sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271303 . Edited for brevity. Excerpts in full can be found in the source. While they were edited to fit the 300 character count, none of the meaning was substantially changed. I welcome anyone to ctrl-f the quoted pieces in the article to see my edits in f…
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:22 PM
3

Time and place. It’s not insecurity to recognize this.
/r/askTRP19/02/21 06:15 PM
4

Betas are beta NOT because of emotion, because of a repression of it. There’s a time and place. Crying in front of your army is a risk. The risks range from scaring the shit out of your men to their estimation of you as a man being diminished. Crying where others can see it should be calculated and done sparingly.
/r/askTRP19/02/21 06:13 PM
1

Get a postgraduate degree and apply for a grant.
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 05:02 PM
2

Yes. It’s actually in the study. F2F OR: 1.13 A-CASI OR: 1.07
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 04:45 PM
8

Men’s Bible Study. How diverse is it? I don’t have a problem with diversity, but I am curious.
/r/askTRP19/02/21 03:57 PM
2

so I took what I could and got outta there. I think that’s the point. It’s not a movement with fixed tenets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/21 03:45 PM
5

It’s really hard to sift through what’s science and what’s acquiescence to straight up intimidation by overzealous transgender activists who send death threats and will try to destroy your professional and social life if you don’t swallow everything they promote, but that’s a long discussion I’m not interested in having right now. Yeah, I've seen a lot of people saying "enjoy the decline". Feels a little victim culturey and give upery, but I mean they can do them I guess. It is a sort of defeati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/21 03:43 PM
3

Aside from the obviously gay guys trying to bait straights I can’t imagine this ever works without the use of depressants covertly slipped into a beverage. If it’s a good way to branch out why should it be a last resort?
/r/askTRP19/02/21 03:23 PM
5

I’m only semi-Chad. Never a leader type though I never wanted to be either. Follower in the best sense of the word.
/r/askTRP19/02/21 01:55 PM
19

Nice username. I’m from the South and my friends are a bit...coarse. The types that would rub people with certain sensibilities the wrong way. Different sense of humor and values from those espoused by say, your average Reddit “male.” I think I’d have a rough time fitting in with a progressive urbanite crowd. I should have elaborated on that when I said “like-minded.”
/r/askTRP19/02/21 01:52 PM
2

It is their fault by the way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/21 12:33 PM
11

I was never a fan of dread game or naked manipulation tactics. Though I do think an abundance mentality and a willingness to walk away from any relationship at any time is generally a good thing. Experience with women and not being a doormat are what’s necessary to mellow out radical sex politics. You need to experience all kinds. But until then, an over-correction away from “women are wonderful” or nice guy servility is necessary. Oneitis and “pedestalizing pussy” are real as well. While going …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/21 11:31 AM
49

I’ll admit a bias towards it, though I haven’t visited the sub regularly for years and years, and I, like most other visitors, don’t take everything taught over there as gospel. What I do however remember is that it was often mischaracterized by its detractors as some rape den for incels, with zero success with women, that preaches violence against women. Obviously if it were, it would have been banned by Reddit which actively bans violent subs and incel subs. I think an accurate though flawed w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/21 09:31 AM
2

To an extent, yes. But if you lived in an ultra-repressive society that severely sanctioned pre-marital sex and extra-marital, that didn’t value privacy and kept you under constant monitor, odds were the levels of both would be little to nil, irrespective of genetic makeup. Levels of promiscuity and infidelity can be extremely curtailed depending on your environment. But even in unfree societies, a strong genetic predisposition towards promiscuity/infidelity can prevail in accomplishing those th…
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:44 AM
1

When it was republished online, there was ample opportunity. Peer-review isn’t as adversarial a process as you imply it to be. As to whether this ignores polygenic attributes, I think neither of us could say.
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:22 AM
3

Genes play a significant role but not the only role. The environment exerts its own influence on the likelihood of infidelity.
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:16 AM
7

Source: Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.147 . Edited for brevity. Excerpts in full can be found in the source. While they were edited to fit the 300 character count, none of the meaning was substantially changed. I welcome anyone to ctrl-f the quoted pieces in the arti…
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 06:13 AM
2

If there’s an open peer review, you should participate. Or you can just referee this in a scholarly peer review, assuming you’re an expert in this field with the right credentials. If similar criticisms already exist, you can link them here.
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 05:56 AM
9

Indeed. Promiscuous women are more likely to be unsatisfied in their marriages commit adultery initiate divorce
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 11:15 PM
7

For women btw. Cherkas, L. F., Oelsner, E. C., Mak, Y. T., Valdes, A., & Spector, T. D. (2004). Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 7(6), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1375/1369052042663922
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 11:38 AM
10

Non-promiscuous women have plenty of options too. They are just significantly less like to act on them.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 08:55 AM
6

I do think there are biological differences though. They make for the best long-distance runners, sprinters, fighters, athletes, etc. The low sophistication in their civilizations may be due to their low average IQ/cognitive abilities, which is both affected by genetics and the environment. To what degree? We don’t know. Still, even though their bell curve is shifted slightly to the left, there are still extraordinarily intelligent blacks who are smarter than 99% of the population. That low aver…
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 08:53 AM
8

I believe a culture-first approach would be where to start. I hate to say it, but I think African-American guys (not including immigrants from African countries like Nigeria who are generally law-abiding) actually do have a culture of toxic masculinity, short fuses and settling things with fists and, in worse cases, bullets. That that culture underlies a gang violence where you can literally get shot dead for walking down the street for having the wrong colored article of clothing. And also brok…
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 08:24 AM
15

Even when you control for SES, there are higher rates. I’m not touching biology, but there is a culture of celebrating non-compliance, settling disputes with violence, and other antisocial activities that isn’t and won’t be addressed. Leftists insist on infantilizing them than assuming they have agency. Gun violence, for examples, is rife in certain minority communities but not in working class white and Asian communities. A toxic culture is at play here that progressives refuse to acknowledge.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 06:57 AM
14

They attribute them as solely resulting from police bias, bias by the courts in their conviction rates and false arrests. Even the victim surveys aren’t trusted by them. Higher crime rates can never be the cause. All can be attributed to external factors like a racist justice system and systemic oppression. And there’s this myth that the police are killing minorities in droves when the kill rates have stabilized around one thousand per year and mostly against violent offenders.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 06:22 AM
8

That’s an unrestricted sociosexual orientation for you. That desire for novelty and variety never goes away. The literature tells you straight up that they make for good short-term partners but awful long-term partners.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 06:18 AM
16

There are a few others as well. Truth is in short supply these days.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 05:21 AM
17

I appreciate your saying so, guy.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 02:36 AM
31

I rely on studies in peer-reviewed journals to back my arguments. What I’m stating is the scientific consensus. It’s funny that progressives arrogantly and ignorantly proclaim themselves as belonging to the “party of science,” when that’s clearly not the case when the scientific consensus contradicts their ideology.
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 02:24 AM
52

I didn’t believe it or the 80% divorce rate until I saw psychologist after psychologist affirming this. The idea is that: Women with unrestricted sociosexual orientations desire variety and novelty, and that desire never goes away because SOI is fixed through ones lifetime. They get bored with a single partner a lot more quickly. Thus they are less committed to any individual partner. Women with unrestricted sociosexual orientations can easily have sex without commitment or intimacy and often do…
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 12:41 AM
37

It isn’t just the “neck/legbeards” that get angry. This gets most Gen Xers and millennials angry. This is one of several uncomfortable truths that society feels more comfortable lying about. Some others being high minority crime rates leading to high minority incarceration rates. Or affirmative action really being used to compensate for inferior standardized test scores/academic records (which are themselves predicted by lower average scores on tests of cognitive ability), and which result in a …
/r/BlackPillScience18/02/21 12:07 AM
30

This used to be apparent to most, though I wouldn’t go so far as to say it was self-evident. This piece of conventional wisdom is increasingly being relegated to the rubbish bin by a class that values ideology over empirical fact because it’s useful to men and inconvenient for women.
/r/BlackPillScience17/02/21 11:52 PM
41

[DIVORCE RISK] “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist . women with zero or one previous sex partners before marriage were also least likely to divorce, while those with 10 or more were most likely. These divorce-proof brides are an exclusive crew: By the 2010s, he writes, just 5 percent of new brides were virgins. And just 6 percent of their marriages dissolved within five years, compar…
/r/BlackPillScience17/02/21 11:08 PM
4

Feminism has only ever been about securing rights and privileges for women while retaining the privileges accorded to them under patriarchal societies. That’s why so many of them are offended by the notion of paying for dates or pursuing men instead of the other way around. They still want sex-based considerations in admissions and hiring even when women exceed 50% in a field. It was never about equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/21 09:36 PM
7

In the end they think one cause is a threat. Our attention is finite, so the more we’re preoccupied with men’s issues, the less we can be of women’s. And two, it is very beneficial for women that this (false) idea that only women face systemic issues persists. The simple fact is that you’ll never get women as a whole to care about men’s issues as much as men care about women’s issues. We care more about their well-being than they can ever care for ours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/21 09:09 PM
45

Usually when people try to discuss men’s suicide rates, third wave feminists arrive to shut it down. Not only do they not care about the issues faced by men, but also they feel threatened by those who bring them up. They think that by highlighting men’s issues, it will simultaneously take the spotlight away from women’s issues while also detracting from their (false) narrative that only women face issues. So they frame men’s advocacy as a joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/21 07:08 AM
2

Her orgasometer has been broken by one too many dicks. OP cannot and should not be held responsible for this.
/r/askTRP28/01/21 02:54 PM
2

You lost when you decided you had to explain yourself. She’s a speck in your rear view.
/r/askTRP28/01/21 04:39 AM
0

High-IQ and competent men don’t need it necessarily. Plenty of research out there on correlates. You may not be able to narrow it down to a specific number, but you can figure out which category a girl falls in.
/r/askTRP27/01/21 10:39 PM
0

Impossible.
/r/askTRP27/01/21 10:34 PM
-1

This is in the sidebar? I’m perusing it but can’t find.
/r/askTRP27/01/21 09:51 PM
3

Suddenly studies have results you’ll accept when they affirm your beliefs? approximately half of women in the top quintiles of sociosexuality [def. willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship] had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality rep…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter