TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SarcastiCock Archive

View 62 posts and 2,169 comments by SarcastiCock on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
338

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights26/05/13 01:48 PM
200

ProgressSarcastiCock/r/MensRights09/03/15 09:28 PM
119

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:46 AM
93

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:49 AM
77

Men's Rights NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:10 PM
68

False AccusationsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:41 AM
47

Eastern CultureSarcastiCock/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:36 PM
46

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:15 AM
42

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:23 AM
41

FeminismSarcastiCock/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:38 PM
40

OpinionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:27 PM
38

OutrageSarcastiCock/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:00 PM
38

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:49 PM
36

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:33 PM
34

DiscriminationSarcastiCock/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:01 AM
34

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:56 AM
34

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:04 AM
29

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:54 AM
29

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:44 AM
28

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:03 PM
27

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:44 PM
26

Social IssuesSarcastiCock/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:41 AM
25

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights03/06/13 04:00 PM
21

DiscriminationSarcastiCock/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:26 AM
21

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:19 PM
20

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights30/01/14 02:31 PM
19

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:22 PM
16

Fathers/CustodySarcastiCock/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:32 AM
12

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:10 PM
11

OpinionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:25 AM
11

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:27 PM
10

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:15 PM
10

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:05 PM
10

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:39 AM
9

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:33 PM
8

WBBSarcastiCock/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:19 PM
8

DiscriminationSarcastiCock/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:42 PM
7

DiscussionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights27/02/15 12:51 AM
7

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:04 AM
6

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:42 PM
6

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:40 PM
6

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:30 AM
6

DiscussionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:54 PM
6

FeminismSarcastiCock/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:17 AM
6

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:04 AM
5

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:36 PM
5

Action Op.SarcastiCock/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:28 AM
5

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:22 PM
3

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights27/03/14 11:57 PM
3

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:17 AM
3

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:17 PM
3

OpinionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:20 AM
2

OpinionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:50 AM
2

SarcastiCock/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 07:45 PM
2

DiscussionSarcastiCock/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:06 PM
2

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:49 PM
2

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:27 PM
2

Raising AwarenessSarcastiCock/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:26 PM
2

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:31 AM
1

SarcastiCock/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:20 PM
1

Reverse GendersSarcastiCock/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:36 AM
0

NewsSarcastiCock/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:01 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,169 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Why did you run and hide from r/mr? You might see the error in your thinking, but not in this hugbox.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:39 PM
2

The MRM knows that. It's a tough slog making emotional arguments which is why factual arguments have always been the cornerstone. But sometimes, those factual arguments are bolstered by emotional arguments. People do care about their sons, fathers, etc, maybe not as much as they care about women, but they do care. There are many weapons in the arsenal, it would be silly to focus on only one method thinking that will work for everyone. In any type of large project you have to break it down into s…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 06:42 PM
-5

I'm responding to MRM related questions. I'm not opposed to TRP, but you guys are really dumb sometimes.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 06:32 PM
-1

The MRM already knows that. Arguing with feminists in good faith is intended to convince bystanders, not feminists. Don't you guys have other interests rather than bitching and complaining about the MRM?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 06:07 PM
2

There was a stickeyed post just two days ago that got several hundred upvotes because MRM wasn't doing it right. You pointed out the clear deliniation between MRM and TRP. TRP solutions don't change the system, they don't change laws, they don't change anything except for yourself.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 04:56 PM
-19

There is zero chance of uniting the manosphere. TRPers don't have an interest in fixing the problems of society, they want to capitalize on it and live the best life they can. If some TRPers want to fix the problems of society they are welcome to join the MRM in that goal. Otherwise, TRPers should stop trying to fuck up the good work others are doing and stop bitching and complaining that others haven't yet accomplished that goal on your behalf. If y'all think you have such great ideas, put them…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 04:45 PM
-2

More false accusations with zero evidence.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 04:34 PM
-3

evolutionary psychology - which, to me is pure science It's not science at all, it's psychology which is closer to philosophy than science. You don't make a very good STEMlord if you can't tell the difference between psychology and science.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 04:24 PM
-6

The result can be seen both in r/mensrights and r/seduction. Both are deeply political correct and pro feminism. Obviously you spend zero time in r/mensrights and don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 04:08 PM
-4

What do you think of concern trolls proclaiming that the MRM will never be successful because of biology?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:20 PM
2

What happened to http://np.reddit.com/user/Claude_Reborn? He dropped a load in /r/mensrights 2 days ago and then ran and hid when he was called on his bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:02 PM
15

CBC is not pro-mensrights, they are anti-male.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:37 PM
12

I agree that it's bullshit, but that's what it is. The charter of rights doesn't apply for you.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:33 PM
9

Downvoted. Please use archive.is for shit feminist sites posing as men's sites. https://archive.is/fL7AC
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:21 PM
24

Yes, case law supports "reverse" discrimination. It's funny how most Canadian think that the charter of rights applies to everyone, it doesn't. Some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:59 PM
42

It's not okay, you should stop shopping there and go somewhere that appreciates your business. I am in the process of filing a complaint with the human rights commission of Alberta. Not sure about the specifics of alberta, but section 15.2 of the Canadian charter of rights allows such discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:48 PM
3

I'm pretty easy going. I see this as a potential measure of societal misandry and an opportunity to expose feminist hypocrisy. It was a damn good article, I would read more of her.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:26 AM
3

It doesn't sound like a very good marketing gimmick since they are insulting their actual customers. This might work to feed a woman's ego for selling her products, but she's not the customer in this instance.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:20 AM
1

Not sure about a few years ago, but he's been going pretty hard on feminism for a while now. It sounds like he finally get's it, but still sees us as foot soldiers for a social conservative culture war.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:16 AM
2

Flip a coin, it happens all the time on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:25 PM
1

If TRP is entirely correct then the MRM would never have seen such recent growth. If they are partially correct, there are still legislative changes that need to be addressed.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:27 AM
5

Honestly? It sounds like sour grapes. Is that a pre-judgement, otherwise known as prejudice? Is it in a lawyers best interests to defend the status quo?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:16 AM
3

What do you think of this lawsuit? http://ncfm.org/2013/08/action/california-parents-file-federal-racketeering-lawsuit-against-family-court-judges-charge-criminal-extortion-bribery-abuse-of-office/
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:39 AM
9

What happens when a woman makes a false claim of abuse?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:35 AM
0

Just because you don't have all the details doesn't make it a sketchy rape claim. Are you drunk?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:49 AM
1

It's just a philosophical unrealistic issue. Men would wake up and rebel long before this ever became close to 10%.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:46 AM
1

The animosity is not between MRA and GG, it's between MRA and redpill. Culture war/gender issue is avoided completely in GG. The culture war is an old and failed tactic in MR and also avoided completely.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:51 AM
15

I have been following #Gamergate for the last 9 months and regardless of what you think of them, you have to admit they have been extremely successful at achieving their aim I've been following gamergate too, I'm subbed to both KIA and TRP as well, although my interest in primarily on observing tactics. I would argue with the current state of college campus rape hysteria, the passing of various radical feminist legislation (at both state and federal level) and the unmitigated failure to mount an…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:49 PM
1

I don't think it's a big issue because nothing is ever going to change the fact that our enemies will misrepresent us at every possible opportunity.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:00 PM
4

It's neither a wasted effort or failure, it's the next step beyond internet activism to infiltrate everything IRL. So much stupid in that post, and the mad max bullshit was ROK, you fuckers, not MRA. I've also been watching GG from the beginning, they're not perfect but they have some good tactics to learn from.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:01 PM
6

Some good points there for consideration but rather unbelievable that they think forming organizations and campus groups is a failure/wasted effort. Those efforts have resulted in tons of media exposure.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:03 PM
2

Only from a philosophical POV, not in practice. All that matters...is it effective?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 12:43 AM
1

Very catchy and it's a great idea. Please post updates.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:47 PM
4

Are you starting to sound like an evangelical preaching the gospel to uneducated heathens at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:45 PM
2

She's funny, a vegan radical preaching the end is near. She's so dumb, it's hard to take her seriously. She doesn't even realize that when/if shit gets bad, she's going to be crying for men to help her.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:43 PM
-5

she who insisted on murders. I think that's always been in dispute, no evidence proving such. But the vidya's did disprove any claims that Karla was a victim in all this.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:13 PM
6

1 was mental illness 2 was false rape accusation by parents (she refused to leave) 3 was also mental illness None of them have much relevance to your point.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:12 PM
4

FYI, I automatically downvote feminist blogs or clickbaity sites not deserving attention. I automatically upvote archive links. I know, I know, it's not rettiquette
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:09 PM
6

Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:32 AM
4

Out of all the religious people I have encountered in life, JWs are the creepiest. It's called a patriarchy and it doesn't exist in the majority of society, just in small and socially isolated orthodox communities. Otherwise, I don't think it has much of anything to do with this subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:27 AM
19

Better for boys too. Just because Sarkeesian says it, doesn't mean it's wrong.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:08 AM
1

No, I'm talking about feminist claims of self defense for all/most of women's violence, not the 0.0001% that is lethal. That has been one of the long standing feminist excuses/explanations for female on male abuse reports. They also try to portray the 0.0001% as representative/potential for all dv.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:01 AM
2

Victim feminism depends on chivalry, so do most women even if they don't admit it. It's one of those things where I agree with you but I don't think that is going to change any time soon in personal relationships, if ever.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:08 AM
1

I'm actually in total agreement with you, but I don't think it passes the sniff test for self defense and wouldn't hold up in court.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:58 PM
1

I'm just saying there were other options available like pushing her, rather than decking her. It's all opinion and it doesn't really matter (or shouldn't matter) that either of them were drunk, they should be held to the same standard. Yes, it's debatable, but it would end up in dv court in front of a judge who probably wouldn't buy that story. I think most lawyers would be reluctant to sell it after seeing the video.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:56 PM
8

Also, season 4 was "ALL MEN MUST DIE" with Daenerys' army of eunichs. That made feminists wet.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:23 PM
1

No, actually I always been skeptical of feminist claims that women's use of violence was self defense as well. Reciprocal abuse is so common (most common) that it is usually my first assumption before proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:12 PM
1

Damn right she was more upset about the potential loss of income than the beating. The system doesn't work, neither of them are receiving the help they need.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:09 PM
1

I explained in another comment why I don't think it's self defense. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/36sxz2/charges_dropped_against_ray_rice/crguotf That's my reasoning, it's also legal requirement for self-defense (aside from stand-your-ground). If he had the option of walking way (or running) then I classify it as "reciprocal abuse". But in all practicality, you know that men don't have any rights to fight back because the man will always be blamed.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:50 PM
0

The best thing for him would have been to walk away and never look back. He's a total idiot for marrying her, but probably felt a lot of pressure to reform his public image.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:44 PM
2

Agreement doesn't mean that you're right.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:37 PM
1

I think he's mistaken, but try to explain instead of shame. I think you're wrong too.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:37 PM
1

It's reciprocal abuse where she is the initiator, not self defense.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:35 PM
1

Technically not self-defense because that only applies when all avenues of escape are not available. It also requires the use of proportionate response. Although, I agree that she should have been charged as well. It's unlikely she learned any lesson other than she has all the power in the relationship and he will be walking on eggshells forever.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:33 PM
2

Which AVFM mod censored this comment that does not break the mod policy? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/36i2l9/a_mra_deepfreeze/crgaeql?context=3 Edit: Uncensored when mod gets called out, but mod remains silent about responsibility for his actions. Just fess up man.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:51 PM
1

No, it's Roosh's site.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:40 PM
2

No, it wasn't. There was never any doxxing. It was originally set up to document female criminals tried and convicted, that's what they told volunteers who did data entry. Then they did a bait and switch and added in their favorite feminist enemies.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:13 PM
0

A warning about AVFM. When register-her.com was setup it was supposed to be about female criminals, tried and convicted. That's what they told the volunteers who worked on data entry. Then they did a bait and switch and added in their favorite feminist enemies.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:09 PM
1

I'm not a fan of AVFM, but is Bernard claiming to be an MRA?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:59 AM
22

I think it's brilliant.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:51 PM
3

He needs to see a lawyer, or maybe a PI if he's reluctant to believe you. He needs to get all of his documents in order. Then talk to him about getting you a new car and both of you a new wardrobe out of "community property" before the axe falls. Sort of joking, but not really.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:14 PM
3

Fantastic news. Keep visiting this sub, other people could benefit from your experience.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:23 PM
4

http://np.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/36h7jn/bahar_mustafa_goldsmiths_diversity_officer_at/?sort=confidence
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:59 AM
2

I don't think marriage makes much difference except that she is officially assumed to have primary custody if you're not married. Still rare for married fathers to get primary custody in divorce. Buckle up, you're in for one wild ride. Record everything (if legal), document everything and be on your best behavior. She's already called the cops, it's her weapon. Next time you might not be so lucky.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:54 AM
1

Sort by best or keep expanding the comments.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:56 PM
1

I can see the comments. It just seems that a lot of recent comments have been deleted. Follow the subreddits rules or get out.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:48 PM
2

What do you mean by "locked comments"?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:27 PM
2

Mostly just young men. Women don't drive as much or as far, it's a flawed comparison, Missy Daisy doesn't ever get in an accident.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:18 AM
3

If feminists talk about domestic violenceviolence against women, MRAs take the opposite stance.talk about violence against everyone FTFY, I stopped reading after that bit of nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:11 AM
1

He always wanted something in earlier films, why did he do it?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:53 PM
1

Thanks for the review Tom Hardy is not australian and it was filmed in africa. How was he as mad max compared to mel gibson? It got lots of attention because they created controversy.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:53 PM
2

I agree with most of your points, except very skeptical of your claim that Max is MGTOW, he sounds like The One Good Man.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:41 PM
2

Of course not, he's boycotting it.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:18 PM
0

Sounds mostly correct in analysis of the feminist plotline, except I don't think it's going to ruin every other action movie. That sounds a bit much, men are the main audience of action movies, this is just a blip. I think this was intended entirely to cause controversy and get free publicity. That doesn't work when every other movie is like that. Furiosa sounds like a good character, so was Aunty Entity in thunderdome.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:17 PM
1

Pretty much the same way you would respond to an evangelist. She's not even your friend, there is no point having a private conversation with her. Block and move on.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:02 PM
12

I think you have a boatload of respect from this community. All of it earned and well deserved. IMO, the Dear Colleague letter put forth a new (and younger) wave of men's activism. I don't think (most) people truly understand what's going on (or don't care) until they start seeing consequences first hand. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:22 PM
6

As seen from gamergate experience, works better to contact advertisers.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:53 PM
2

The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:07 PM
3

Only 15 minutes? Seems like you came with pre-existing bias. Keep reading, try the side bar and search bar.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:07 PM
1

Generally referred to as women's nuclear option in family law.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:22 AM
10

/r/canada is a hard feminist leftist safe space. Shitbag http://www.reddit.com/user/DrJulianBashir banned me for posting articles from the national post.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:10 AM
2

Feminists don't see much distinction. Women's position in the middle east is mostly static under sharia.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:46 AM
1

Sounds a lot like MGTOW, not MRA, but rather a wonderful guy, I would have loved to known him.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:30 AM
1

Does it sound like a handmaid's tale? A dystopian future where the patriarchy oppresses women?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:25 AM
2

Sorry, but the big government US republicans hate Ron Paul as much as big government leftists do.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:42 AM
4

Sort of, but the US reality is that right wing is heavily religious social conservative, which MGTOW are not. Limited government is also called classic liberalism.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:41 AM
1

I dont' think AVFM has any responsibility here. One writer (Obsidian) did an interview with Roosh, many in the comments section criticized roosh (they hate PUAs)
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:41 PM
1

You're misinformed, listening to liars. Your few bad sources are not men's rights voices at all. Why do you believe in men's rights and why are you interested in watching this movie?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:31 PM
24

Are you going because it's a good movie or just to make a point? Let me know if it's a good movie, I might consider it.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:59 PM
2

I don't agree with your definitions. Redpill to me is analagous to women's cosmopolitan magazine, dating and mating strategies. Not necessarily misogynistic on it's own, but potentially. PUA's are very close to Redpill, but not entirely focussed on one-night stands. MGTOW, not at all politically far-right, a complete mischaracterization. MRA, used to focus on "legal" issues. Focussing on social issues brings you into Redpill/PUA/MGTOW territory.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:57 PM
5

Is Canadian, recorded in Toronto. Sun News Network has since closed up shop.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:06 PM
2

Stopped reading halfway through. She didn't need consent and she wasn't hostile or aggressive at all. Where is the evidence of harrassment by CBC? It was an online witch hunt that named and shamed him. Hydro One screwed up for sure. Their CEO is an idiot.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:31 PM
2

Moreso an influx of social conservatives concerned about a larger culture war(coughbaldwincough). Your efforts are futile and probably antithetical since this post is promoting KIA and more likely to attract more r/mensrights readers than not.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:32 PM
5

I'm subbed to KIA, but I've only ever made 2 comments. When Quinspiracy started, r/mensrights took little interest. When gamergate started, they posted here looking for allies, r/mensrights took little interest. Hijacking that sub You mean like KIA's popular support for HBB and CHS? I think you have things ass-backwards and are being selective in your reasoning. corruption, censorship and social engineering It's been an issue for r/mensrights for much longer for the much larger mainstream media,…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:29 PM
3

That happens in all communities, just more prevalent in lower socioeconomic strata, like most social problems are. The reasoning is simple, feminist logic of patriarchal oppression falls apart if they start blaming black men, who actually have a historical record of real slavery and real oppression. Must of really been tough life for all those oppressed white women with having so many black slaves around the house.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:40 AM
3

They don't need to target minorities with their rhetoric, they target them with their policies. Domestic violence, divorce and fatherlessness is more prevalent in lower socioeconomic strata which affects minorities more.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:35 AM
3

Do you think feminist policy only affects white men? Don't listen to what they say, look at what they do and how it affects people.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:27 AM
13

I kinda think a sign that says "drunk women are dangerous" and "drunk women might change their mind in the morning" would be a better warning to men.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:29 AM
1

.let them make their own decisions and failures...be there to help them out on the big disasters by providing support, don't put up with bullshit and temper tantrums, be firm but not reactive, let them fail to learn lessons. Good advice for parents too, seems a bit paternalistic tho.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:25 AM
2

There is not a universal male experience, there is not a universal black experience, etc., etc., etc. That's why I think it's better to treat people as individuals rather than pretend they are a homogenous group. I don't think you're understanding your own logical disconnect.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:39 PM
3

Sidebar>>>>>
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:18 PM
3

We're covering the male part of intersectionality. I don't see a problem with individuality, people should be treated as individuals. Likewise, nothing is all men VS the world. OMG, feeeeeeeeeeeelings.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:16 PM
11

Yes, it is stupid. You are also stupid if you think ROK is an MRA site.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:00 PM
2

The reporter didn't get him fired. She interviewed him and the story went viral. She did her job, the camera and microphone were in plain view. The internet lynch mob got him fired.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:31 AM
5

The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:43 AM
1

No. They going to put that toward their "expenses" from the calgary expo, which they previously raised over 10k$ from crowdfunding and typhonblue recently said was only ~half their expenses. The remaining they will consult with donors if the case does not go forward.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:20 AM
8

I resent your insults to my au natural turtle dick. It's wonderfully protective to keep my frenulum and glans soft and sensitive. Ew, scar tissue.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:26 AM
10

I don't know why either, female circumcision is becoming more popular too. Might want to think about that for your future daughter.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:04 AM
0

What do you think alpha/beta means? It doesn't matter what other people think, you're the one using the definition. Not sure what you intend to mean by "male apologist", male feminists are absolute gynocentrists. That would seem to me to be less than alpha, which I consider to be a leader among men, not a pussy chaser.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:53 AM
2

What is your definition of alpha and beta if you are so perceptive to make that determination? From a PUA perspective, they're not alphas, because MGTOW don't focus their lives on the pursuit of pussy. I don't think that's a good definition of alpha tho, it's pretty reductive. I think the very term MGTOW is the anti-thesis of male feminism, who are primarily "betas" grovelling for pussy. There's lots variation in MGTOW, few rules, mostly a rejection/recognition of gynocentrism, which feminism fe…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:28 AM
1

Still don't know where this "feminist MGTOW" is that you speak of? So, you're saying that a crippled old man can be alpha, as long as he's born with it? Doesn't seem like a very good definition, doesn't even work in the animal kingdom. It's not a very good argument because it doesn't make any sense, at all. I think there's varying definitions of MGTOW, but the most basic is a self sufficient man who doesn't rely on the accolades of women for determining his self worth.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:07 AM
0

Cool story bro, who is this "feminist MGTOW" that you speak of? Seems abnormal, I've never encountered a feminist MGTOW or even a submissive MGTOW. Why do you bring this discussion here instead of /r/MGTOW ? Is there an alpha/beta quiz that one can take to determine one's social class?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:21 AM
1

Okay, I'll bite. What is your proposed solution to the education gap and why will it work any better than feminism's response to any other gap?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:40 PM
1

It's not a manifesto that will gain traction if you limit the number of issues to your own personal preference. Why not just a manifesto of one issue?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:31 PM
5

I don't think it's entirely due to jealousy but rather that some feminists bear a striking resemblance to Victorian puritans. Sometimes, I can't tell the difference.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:40 PM
1

The globe and mail doesn't get much support for their stupid gendered opinions. It's mostly just clickbait, they're desperate for readers. If the media just ignored these boneheaded feminist activists, it wouldn't be an issue. It's hilarious, UBC professor says "nobody asked us", but she didn't nominate anyone, none of them did. They're blaming the committee for not receiving enough nominations. That kind of nonsense is almost a daily occurance at the globe.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:14 AM
0

I highly doubt it, she's more hard left feminist loony tune than the marxist dippers.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:25 AM
3

Queens Park is the Ontario Government, not the Canadian Government. It's the right place to go because health care is a provincial responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:24 AM
1

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:23 AM
4

It's a nice platitude but I don't think anybody respects everybody simply because they're a person. It usually takes more to earn respect. Compassion would be nice, but that's probably also an unreasonable and far off goal. How about specific legal issues?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:20 AM
3

Section 15.2 of the CHRA says it's okay discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:13 AM
2

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.ca/
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:21 AM
5

First, it's a shit title. Second, less weight. Third, it's a one way trip.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:18 AM
26

That's brilliant. Well done.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:14 AM
3

The Agenda is on TVO, but they pretty much have the same policies of getting lots of women and minorities to appear and the same problem with stacking the panel with preferred opinions. At least Steve Paikin is obvious about the lack of women, they decline too often and have too many excuses not to appear.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:09 AM
5

Well, you know Jonathan Kay is Barbara Kay's son, so he should know some of this. He's not a die hard social conservative like Barbara, more of a centrist but he's surrounded by leftist "progressives". He has written (once maybe) about the high price paid by falsely accused men. Now that he's editor for the Walrus, I suspect he's too damn scared to speak out against "progressives". Jonathan never seemed that outgoing, rather an upper middle class metropolitan pampered life, but always under the …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:36 PM
2

It starts getting real around the 35 minute mark. They mad. Jerry plays cool and shoves his patriarchy in the the face of the victimhood celebration, making them look like complete idiots. He got kicked out because they have a self-flagellating men-only policy. He was being disruptive by talking calmly and disrupting their yelling and chanting and visible anger.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:58 PM
2

Everyone is afraid to discipline children because the consequence of that being told in the media is even worse.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:46 PM
9

4 year old article. Buffy was a neurotic idiot with a repressed sexual attraction to bad boys and her wiccan lesbian friends and manservant were just creepy. Basically a teenage soap opera with no substance, but a large audience.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:18 AM
11

Wow, they found the 2% pay gap. It sure has shrunk a lot.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:56 PM
3

I think you're remembering that wrong. It was a fathers rights group in BC that sued some major women's group (don't remember exactly) for naming them as an example of male misogyny in one of their reports. Sued successfully but zero damages, repercussions or retractions because section 15.2 or something something.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:03 PM
1

Seems like a silly debate since most of the violence in video games and real life is against men. Why not just get a few Erin Pizzey clips?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:53 PM
1

http://www.fathers-4-justice.us/content/arizona IMO, not a lawyer, the $500 flat fee sounds bogus but you will need some legal advice and someone to help you navigate the court system. You will need to propose a more reasonable and gradual parenting arrangement. Have you ever even met your child? The $2500 retainer will get eaten up quickly if she's not agreeable.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:47 PM
2

Not sure if confirmed, but ....
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:43 AM
2

https://web.archive.org/web/20140713172759/http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/47007463161/oratorasaurus-the-so-called-pay-gap
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:35 PM
1

If you take out the piercings, the hole closes up and disappears. Also, lots of 12 year old girls would gladly go get it done. I don't think the analogy holds.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:52 AM
2

It doesn't seem like anyone had any evidence of any direct harm to the child. You're just operating based on conjecture. Lot's of people with much worse mental illnesses still have their children. I don't think I would want a society where children can be stripped from their parents on such a shaky basis. Sometimes you seemed like a reasonable feminist. This time, you just sound like a hypocritical cunt.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:20 PM
1

http://www.barbarakay.ca/articles/view/485
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:41 PM
1

The premise is flawed, male nudity in classical history was not considered wrong. Even when I grew up, men were taught not to be shy about their own nudity, ie. group showers were "heteronormative"
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:22 AM
2

What does asking women for coffee have to do with self discovery?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:58 AM
3

A trim would be nice, hair just gets in the way of doing business.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:29 AM
2

Doesn't sound very good. I'm a huge fan of cunnilingus but only if a woman is willing to reciprocate. Don't like women who are lazy in bed and just starfish.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:27 AM
4

I don't think it's particularly inspiring or a male movement as much as it is a dating experiment. I don't think blogging about it will make it any more interesting.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:23 AM
1

I've seen this too often. Generally how it goes is that once fathers have used up all their money fighting a system that is stacked against them, they start representing themselves in court and stop enriching the system that doesn't care about them. Contact your local F4J.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:19 AM
6

low effort image post+reddit=upvotes
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:36 PM
1

Well, it sure as fuck isn't a men's site.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:36 AM
1

I don't think that's happening. Paul has turned it into a money making business now and that's progress.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:36 AM
1

I wanna see it just because it sounds weird and could apply to anyone and not just men. I'm not so sure if I even believe there's such a thing as a male collective experience.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:32 AM
1

Pretty much, damselling works, so I hope she works it good and gets lots of attention.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:23 AM
0

That's just referring to AVfSMAW's non-MGTOW tradcon version.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:21 AM
1

I'm not particularly a fan of labels, not MHRA or MGTOW+ either. Just face the truth, it was epic, deliberate and brilliant...damselling.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:13 AM
0

Still damselling, but damn effective and I'm a practical kind of guy so I'm okay with it. JTO is still right
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:32 PM
3

Great job, looks nice.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:45 PM
1

Tell us what kind of activism you used to do. (ie. why you think you were an MRA) As well, what is it about your beliefs that makes you a feminist.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:51 AM
2

The social circle being gender studies/sociology majors?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:31 PM
2

Here's my take, take it or leave it. She devolves into making things personal by jumping to conclusions in her interpretations to demonstrate why she is a victim of even a simple conversation with you. It's petty, it's dishonest and it reflects that she does not have much faith in your intentions or you as a person. I say this not because she is touting feminism (because I'm ignoring those parts of simple disagreement), but because of my personal experiences with much much worse.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:14 PM
1

Dude you're lazy, this is the first thing that came up from a google search http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf The documentary is called brainwash https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiJVJ5QRRUE The other question is also answerable with a google search. https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#q=gender+differences+in+infants
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:37 AM
0

Not even a funny troll, 1/10
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:13 AM
3

Worrying if they're okay and not being able to contact them.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:18 PM
2

Women have higher standards. Men often have too low of standards.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:04 PM
7

It's almost common knowledge now that it's a manipulative lie.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:29 AM
4

So who are those people calling us the "abusers lobby" when we try to advocate change? Edit: I can't even do a google search for scholarly research without the f-word popping up all over. I guess all those links aren't allowed.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:13 AM
3

Okay first post OP. I followed your rules. How do we have this discussion without the f-word? How does society solve the problem of family violence? There seems to be double standards about how domestic violence is treated for men, how do we change the system and procedures to actually solve the problem of family violence that is taught to children. I suggest the following procedure: Analyze the existing system for it's failures to properly treat all forms of family violence. Change it.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:01 AM
1

Here's an idea. You could just filter out all the crud from this sub and repost there. I dunno if it's going to get much action otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:44 AM
0

Why does Dan have a stick up his ass about MGTOW?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:15 PM
6

No comparison at all to TRP. Completely different.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:14 PM
6

Their discussion about the AVFM conference and disagreements about protesting or not is quite funny.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:14 PM
5

I think the discussion is good, even if you come across as a whiny hormonal shit making bogus comparisons with feminists. You also have good points, although perhaps unrealistic and misguided. Maybe some posters are actually hormonal twelve year olds, this is reddit. Maybe some are frustrated and want to vent. Maybe a lot of posts and comments are misguided or low quality shit posts. Newbies need to learn, not be kicked out because they said something that seems stupid or wouldn't pass in a high…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:29 PM
4

It's really tough to measure and have that measure mean something. You could look at website stats, but even that doesn't mean growth of actual MRAs. The issues are getting a lot more attention tho.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:20 PM
4

It seems to have been growing exponentially in the past few years. Much more mainstream media exposure and meetings IRL.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:12 PM
2

http://thoughtcatalog.com/jake-fillis/2014/05/23-quotes-from-feminists-that-will-make-you-rethink-feminism/
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:11 AM
5

Personal experience. My girlfriend once had sex with me after I fell asleep after a night shift. I didn't wake up until the orgasm.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 11:33 PM
1

Probably also has something to do with the war in yemen.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:46 PM
5

Not really, there are some of the same issues, but it seems to be mostly trolling feminists.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:38 PM
6

It sounds like a bunch of bullshit that didn't come from here. Yes, MRAs are generally anti-feminist but not exclusively(read about it on the sidebar) and meninism is a parody of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:20 PM
2

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/dec/01/109-women-prosecuted-false-rape-allegations
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:17 PM
2

link has nothing to do with video games
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:37 AM
12

“Where is Homer, anyway?” – Selma Bouvier “It’s so typical of the big doofus to spoil it all.” – Patty Bouvier “What, Aunt Patty?” – Lisa Simpson “Oh, nothing, dear, I’m just trashing your father.” – Patty Bouvier “Well, I wish you wouldn’t. Because, aside from the fact that he has the same frailties as all human beings, he’s the only father I have. Therefore he is my model of manhood, and my estimation of him will govern the prospects of my adult relationships. So I hope you bear in mind that a…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:07 AM
1

This was just posted: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/puot0002/3004/Women,%20careers,%20and%20work-life%20preferences.pdf Also, this has lots of links. https://web.archive.org/web/20140713172759/http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/47007463161/oratorasaurus-the-so-called-pay-gap
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:31 PM
1

Just off the top of my head, but Mr. E's first article on the site promoted marriage and children to combat feminism by reproduction.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:21 AM
2

They do have a big future, they're monetizing AVFM, just not "for men".
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:19 AM
2

This is pretty much it. I see it more as an exercise in expanding anti-feminism to include more women, particularly social conservative/traditionalist women. It's not a bad strategy in that sense, but they're still subtly turning their backs on MGTOW to accomplish this.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:20 PM
2

last five years of his kids life letting this woman rail road him into being nearly pushed out of this kids life. It's almost irrelevant since he hasn't even bothered going to court for 5 years. he's since become more responsibile. Honestly she's very possibly an alcoholic So, you both make counter claims that the other can't be trusted, but without evidence. How responsible? Can he promise to minimize/stop drinking during visitation? He's completely ignorant of his legal paternal rights. He has…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:15 PM
1

Oh come on now. She's an "MHRA" or MGTOW+, and it has zero to do with men's rights and completely ignores the mule's burden. Fer fucks sake, fail!
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:01 PM
1

I think Golden and Palmatier are pretty good but the overall lineup doesn't justify the price. Unless they're trying to re-coup all costs and allow for speaking fees and travel allowances. Still not sure how Molyneux ever got involved. Fiamengo is popular but I don't think she's a good speaker with indepth knowledge.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:40 PM
1

What is the difference between a wife and a girlfriend? Same type of relationship, but one is a contract with the state.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:24 PM
2

Women's fashion controlled by a tiny cabal of gay patriarchs.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:23 PM
3

Just about any bad relationship can be pathologized as abuse per the Duluth wheel of power and control. I have to agree though, this is a big stretch.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 11:26 PM
1

Ignoring a judge's orders is a criminal offense Not a civil court order.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:58 PM
2

Police don't have anything to do with civil courts. Firing back costs a lot of money.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:01 AM
3

If you were unaware, perhaps she's full of shit and just trying to create drama. More details please, what does "she will keep him till her time is up" mean? Is she following the custody order?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:55 PM
4

Yep, this is how the Canadian right jumped into bed with feminism to enact Canada's new prostitution laws.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:27 PM
1

I think Paul recognizes that he stepped in shit. He said that he supports the marriage strike in his recent fundraiser. Suz is still a massive cunty bitch on a power trip.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:09 PM
3

Don't know, always appreciate reading his blog and material. He's been active on reddit more recently. http://www.reddit.com/user/PierceHarlan/submitted/
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:11 AM
1

Another one out of the park by Blatchford. The partisans are busy sniping about technicalities and protecting the golden boy.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:23 AM
2

Heh, upvote for appropriate tag and title.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:18 AM
7

Good list of examples.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:14 PM
0

This is all about nothing. I'm thinking trolling for reaction.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:55 PM
1

OMG, the war begins over who is offended more over "words". Perspective people, perspective.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:20 PM
-1

It would be pretty hard to white knight when I also laugh at the victorian puritans getting upset over words.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:19 PM
2

OP is redditor for six days. Take it with a huge grain of salt.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:46 PM
-1

I think yer getting all pissy over nothing bro. I'm not a chick, what to do?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:45 PM
-9

This isn't part of the MHRA/MGTOW+ safe space. Go cry about it at AVFM
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:58 AM
4

Genders reversed, guy singing about dick with young girl sitting on steps. Probably wouldn't be made and there'd be all sorts of outrage. Doesn't look like anyone was harmed in this video, bonus dat asssss
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:51 AM
-14

MHRA/MGTOW+=Conservatism in drag. It's becoming more and more obvious, just be honest guys. You sound so fucking stupid spinning the denial.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:37 AM
-1

How do we convince society to care about men as much as it cares about women? That's pretty much the greatest obstacle to the MRM, shouldn't that be a question posed to yourself, KS, Fiddy, or Patriarchy dude. Wait, are you actually making a fucking argument for traditionalism?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:34 AM
-4

Mere semantics over definitions. I find little distinction between the fear/protection of feminism vs. fear/protection of conservativism/traditionalism. As far as honesty goes, prostitutes are moreso, because the traditionalist woman manipulates the mule into the yoke by stroking his ego.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:29 AM
20

Do you feel that boy? The way the shit clings to the air. Shit blizzards coming
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:24 AM
3

No where near 160K, but if paul can make a really good living then that's great. He's not even pretending that all of it goes to avfm. More people will step forward and do something if they can make money.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:56 AM
3

They don't raise anywhere near that amount and a good chunk of it is definitely expenses.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:47 AM
5

They have expenses and they do things, but as far as I know Victor's stuff was a separate fundraising drive and staff don't get squat.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:15 AM
4

I don't think it's a big deal, he probably pocket's some of it, but it can't be much compared to all the time he puts in, there are expenses too. The people who should be taking issue with it are the other writers, who don't get squat.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:14 AM
2

Beautiful. Well done guys.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:07 AM
3

It will probably happen eventually, but not a big deal.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:05 AM
7

Evo-psych, humanities, women's studies are all social science. They are science-ish, all with varying degrees of truth and mis-perception.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:02 AM
4

The point, you avoided it. Imagine abused women complaining that they lost custody and now have to pay their abuser. Momma needs her smokes and booze and won't get off her ass to work.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 10:22 PM
1

If you file for an adjustment based on current financial information would you get the same judge? Also, see link on F4J Minnesota on Judicial complaints.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:03 PM
1

That's understandable, it's a terrible position for someone to be in. Have you considered going back to court pro se if you can't afford the lawyer? What is CPS involvement regarding her history?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:00 PM
3

Doesn't know what to do or doesn't think you have enough money?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:57 PM
1

That sounds terrible man, I hope you're okay. I would suggest contacting the National Parents Organization and F4J Minnesota
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:56 PM
3

“In an effort to denounce and prevent violence, and because we believe that men and boys, aboriginal and non-aboriginal alike must be part of the solution, we are supporting community-driven projects to engage men and boys,” Mr. Valcourt {conservative minister of aboriginal affairs} told the roundtable. Both Ms. Leitch and Mr. Valcourt have said they believe the solution to the violence rests largely with changing the behaviours and attitudes of men on reserves who they say are most often the pe…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:55 PM
2

It seems to be just you, it works for us.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:53 PM
1

I don't think so.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:35 PM
4

I don't think that's anything new, maybe for your home state, but it's pretty common that parenthood is optional for women pre and post birth.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:07 AM
2

I saw this posted here a while ago, it's been around, lots of sources. http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/47007463161/oratorasaurus-the-so-called-pay-gap
/r/MensRights27/02/15 12:17 AM
1

This just seems strange. There is no mention of actual charges in the article and what is described does not appear to be criminal in nature. It seems that the father of one of the accused boys was attempting to defend his son from false accusations of rape.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:04 AM
1

There's lots of grey area between everything and nothing. Seems strange for an anarchist to be speaking in absolutes.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:39 PM
-4

This post is no longer appearing on http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/new/ I look forward to the new issue, it's better than sorting through all the crap to get to the gold.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:45 AM
3

The ban hammer is pretty strong at AVFM against anyone who might question the legitimacy of their newly minted MGTOW+.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:28 PM
1

It's a video, calm the fuck down, some people like bedtime stories. Also, if I knew how to post the text, then I might have done so. At least I marked the video at the relevant time. You sound upset that this is being posted at all, very telling.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:14 AM
1

Video starting at relevant bits, but his analysis of JTO and AVFM is also spot on. RBK describes the grand battle as between feminism and traditionalism and that the (?real?) MRA's are a minority. Also that we are watching the natural decline of feminism's own excess.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:53 AM
0

Why would anyone bother to make such effort? Don't you think he was just trying to scare you?
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:12 AM
3

All the time huh?
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:11 AM
1

Social engineering is what feminists do.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:05 AM
9

How does that somehow negate every other issue in the world?
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:55 AM
7

That sounds so unfair that they thought it was all unsubstantiated. If only you had some place to go, someone to talk to, someone to advocate for you, like a woman's shelter.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:51 AM
2

Well, that's interesting, because RAINN doesn't support rape culture.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 03:09 AM
12

She found that of the first 100 women who came to her shelter, 62 were as or more violent than the partners they tried to escape from -- only to return to their partners time and again because of their addiction to pain and violence, violence that they persistently did their best to bring about. Over a period of ten years, Erin Pizzey became involved with about 5,000 women and their children who came through her shelter. She has written a number of books on domestic violence, one of which, Prone…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:39 AM
2

Maybe, but IF MRA is a non-ideological activist movement based on issues, there is no reason why they wouldn't.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:26 AM
2

It's clickbait.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:21 AM
2

Yes, some do.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:56 AM
3

While I know that Roosh isn't an MRA, because he says he's not, what is a "real MRA"? I'm not trying to start a litmus test, but it seems pretty broad and also used by traditionalist anti-feminists.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:47 AM
0

It's blatantly obvious that AVFM went tradcon so that Paul could obtain his harem.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:07 PM
2

as such traditionalism gives men compensation. Not true in western countries, traditionalism is in fact the riskiest relationship of all. It's like having a full sized spoiled brat to take care of.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:06 PM
2

This was posted just yesterday. http://www.np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2wctjw/i_just_finished_my_1st_draft_of_mens_rights_mens/
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:33 PM
3

Even though AVFM got their panties in a bunch, if you don't have JTO on that list, it's not complete.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 10:10 PM
3

Equality is a concept, gains are made on individual issues.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 09:45 PM
3

That would seem to be ideal, but I think history has proven otherwise
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:55 PM
2

The court has heard that Denis knew him so much so that they had an affair that ended badly, with her complaining to Ottawa police that he had raped her. The allegation is unfounded and not even psychiatrists called by her defence team believe she was raped.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:23 PM
2

He's the writer of the linked article.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:04 PM
1

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/white-male-lawyers-should-say-no-to-judicial-appointments/article23044838/
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:18 PM
3

Thanks for the reminder.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:31 PM
2

He never tried to shut her down, he gave her ample opportunity to talk and explain herself, then he acted like an ass.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:14 AM
2

Bottom 3 appear to be exactly the same flag at different events.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:39 AM
1

The National Parent's Organization supports both Mothers and Fathers and works towards sanity and equality in family law, unlike major feminist organizations, such as NOW.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:13 AM
2

Haven't bothered reading GMP in a long time because it's mostly shit. This was a good article, tell me OP, are 95% of the other's still shit?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:03 PM
52

OP, can you please explain what this meninist thing is all about? At one time I thought it was mostly trolling feminists, so what's going on?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:40 PM
2

Not sure what you are getting at, there is NO accused for the case of this nail trap. The article briefly mentioned another case of human traps, but that's not what the headline is about.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:43 PM
2

Sounds very difficult to convince her to take less money than is court ordered.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:41 PM
1

I don't think that's really a problem. For all the efforts and $$$ put into increasing women's participation in STEM fields, the numbers have barely budged.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:27 PM
2

my right to continue as my childs full time care giver. I don't think that's a right, more of a privilege.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:24 PM
6

It's probably just a stock photo from the Medical University of Vienna. A team of scientists led by Shahrokh Shariat, Head of the University Department of Urology at the MedUni Vienna and the Vienna General Hospital and member of the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Vienna, has now developed a program that optimises the testing procedure. He's a dude.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:23 PM
1

I was kinda thinking that three groups of israeli students isn't really representative of anything. Edit: Also, http://www.webcitation.org/6FvhhQ30e
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:44 AM
1

Beginning in 2002, the researchers studied three groups of Israeli students from sixth grade through the end of high school.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:37 AM
41

Guy has to go to the BC supreme court just for the right to hold his false accuser accountable for slander and libel.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:35 AM
9

Unfortunately, it appears that the /r/MensRights survey was brigaded with bots, or maybe even some very dedicated trolls. Regardless, the results for the survey of this sub are clearly compromised. I apologize for the disappointment.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:28 AM
-1

Go troll elsewhere, you are genuinely a really shitty person.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:59 AM
-1

He answered yes=no conscience. /u/kirk88 is new here, sketchy comment history, inter-reddit drama. Fucksake, it's a troll: reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2vhoz5/why_do_age_of_consent_laws_exist/
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:53 AM
1

That's how only you decide to interpret the question, not how others interpret your answer.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:51 AM
0

I didn't say that, it's just garden variety trolling.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:50 AM
0

No, it's like saying would you kill somebody if you didn't go to jail. Edit: /u/todduk also a brand new account. I kinda had that impression with the stupid question. Is /u/kirk88 a sockpuppet or is this organized from a private subreddit? Hmmmm?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:43 AM
1

New here, sketchy comment history, inter-reddit drama, no conscience. Or, maybe you're just a really shitty person for realz.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:41 AM
2

The survey was a very small sample size with very sketchy methodology. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2tbv88/investigator_the_third_of_men_would_rape_if_no/ Also, I'm pretty sure /u/kirk88 is a troll.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:35 AM
7

Edit: I fooked up. Tremendously surprised and impressed, I've never seen such a thing given attention to like that.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:49 AM
4

What do I do? Add two line spaces after each paragraph break please, this wall of text is unreadable.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:31 PM
4

Exactly, they took feminist talking points and switched the genders.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:21 PM
5

Interesting plot line. Ben is campaigning for office and Leslie is expected to enter a traditional pie making contest (Pie-Mary) for the campaigner's wives. She decides to skip the Pie-Mary and the conservative media make a big fuss about it. She reconsiders and decides to enter the contest to not distract from Ben's campaign. Rad fem knocks at her door and tells her that if she now decides to enter the Pie-Mary then they will protest her and Ben at the event. Ben decides to bake the pie himself…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:08 PM
2

Seems like a silly exercise since the measure of equality is arbitrary.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:38 PM
1

I think you screwed up the link. http://herocomplex.latimes.com/games/revolution-60-sci-fi-mobile-game-puts-women-at-the-front/ What I want to know is HOW is any game developer considered to be an engineer, based on any definition? Never heard of this myth about women can't be engineers.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:36 PM
2

Again, classic DARVO. This is a common theme for you. Is this mental illness or troll?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:06 AM
2

You're simply a liar, what other response can I make to someone so devoid of honesty and integrity?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:00 AM
5

Redditor for 5 hours, username cuntingoff. Red flags are flying high.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:52 AM
2

I still think you're a troll, but you spend a lot of time doing it. Seem to like making shit up and arguing about shit you made up.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:48 AM
7

Sounds like a false accusation, quote me on that or retract it. Regardless, I don't think you've proven anybody wrong, you just have low standards.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:34 AM
3

The start of something bigger already happened. You seem to be making an issue of a small straw fish. TYT is not really that interesting.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:41 AM
13

Use http://archive.today/ on all shitposting misandrist sites.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 12:18 AM
2

Although a bit old, here are some examples off the top of my head: http://www.amazon.ca/Spreading-Misandry-Teaching-Contempt-Popular/dp/0773530991 http://adamjones.freeservers.com/globe.htm Edit: Another http://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms/article/view/6 Damn, things are effed up in Oz. http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/sanctified-bigotry/
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:21 PM
5

I would like to apologize to all the WWE fans and my family and friends for private photographs that were distributed without my consent.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:04 PM
2

I think the damage is going to depend on your future taxable earnings.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:13 AM
1

What's TPR? It doesn't matter what you want, she'll have a baby and you'll pay for it. Cross your fingers that it's not yours.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:05 AM
3

Man flu - Used to minimize/belittle men's illness.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 08:17 PM
1

Seems to only work with RES.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:21 AM
1

Nothing happens for me when I click on the bold faced flair. I tried it in chrome and explorer
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:36 AM
-1

An adult human male.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:58 PM
2

The current research is being done by special interest groups that cherry pick data among select industries to conclude that it is better for companies, but they do nothing to show causation. Watch part 1 of Hjernevask, The Gender Equality Paradox, which helps to explain why the labor market becomes more gender segregated the more economic prosperity a country has.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:37 PM
3

Or maybe not as many women show up and campaign to become elected?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:22 PM
1

I think the main distinction is that personal choice overrides societal pressure, especially in western countries. The evidence shows that it's true too. Edit: A libertarian is just a fiscally responsible liberal, not right wing.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:12 AM
2

What are the other defining characteristics of a radfem? Do you also distinguish between gender feminists and equity feminists?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:42 AM
1

Isn't a popular opinion amongst MRAs that it is unfair that men are expected to do the fighting Sort of, but more accurately it is more popular opinion that someone needs to do the fighting and men are the ones who step forward far more often. Not that it's unfair, because it's personal choice, something that 98% of feminists fail to recognize. Perhaps it would be a more fair society if more men hid away with women and children when somebody else did the fighting, but we would lose the war.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:23 AM
5

Maybe I was having a dislexic moment, but I thought the title was referring to the Guardian. More apropos IMO.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 10:28 PM
22

I'm not really a fan of Paul, but the Buzzfeed article actually made me feel a bit sorry for him. This response further humanizes him. I actually think this whole debacle will backfire.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:29 PM
1

Whoa, readers of 50 shades are spitting on the victims of ted bundys grave. That's some serious hyperbole, get help.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:35 AM
3

Wow, that was powerful.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:18 AM
3

They turn their butts to the car and when the car drives forward to run them over they sit on the hood(better than under it) and put a sticker on the window to block the driver's forward vision.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:16 AM
3

They seem to have a lot of public support, probably moreso than the police. The purpose of the stickers is to stop the drivers from moving forward and running them over.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:05 AM
14

I didn't understand this at first, but they have a lot of other videos. Apparently drivers in russia like to drive on pedestrian walk ways to take short cuts or avoid traffic jams. This activist groups tactics are to stand in a group in the way of cars and talk to them and convince them to back up and get back on the road. If the driver goes forward to move them out of the way, they sit on the hood and put a sticker on the window. Seems justifiable when someone is trying to run you down on the s…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:57 AM
26

All men want is sex.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:27 PM
1

The scientific method applies to sociology just as it does to anything else Can't do controlled experiments. It's not the same.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:42 PM
1

I can't answer your questions with certainty as I am not a lawyer, but you can try to draft up an agreement and have a lawyer review the final draft. Serving her at work may be your only option. Seeing as there is a big disagreement in the visitation, you will probably end up in court at some time to resolve it. You can self represent to minimize legal costs, but you will still need legal advice from time to time. I would suggest contacting the https://nationalparentsorganization.org/ for furthe…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:33 PM
2

I'm pretty sure you have to file in the state that the child is a resident. Visitation and support are always separate issues. It's not easy dealing with a difficult ex, I wish you the best. Edit: You're probably looking in the tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, depending entirely on how difficult she is.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:09 PM
1

There are no boys in the girls hockey association?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:17 PM
2

Your english teacher is talking about her rape in high school?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:39 PM
2

It's a good thing that you are trying to work things out with your ex without lawyers, but get a lawyer to review the final agreement. They will check the calculated amount for your income. Edit: Other things, like custody, visitation, holidays, division of assets, etc. Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:43 PM
1

It's a girls hockey association so there are no boys dressing rooms.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:11 PM
4

I watched the video and I thought he was being an idiot. But I thought he was being so much of an idiot that it was possibly satire. I thought it was a softball interview and he actually aided in Karen's points by his idiocy, hence the comparison to Colbert. However, I'll take your word on it that he is actually an idiot and that it wasn't satire.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:26 PM
5

I don't think I'm being unfair, I said he let her talk a lot, I gave him credit for the same thing you did. What downvotes? Cenk acted as he always does. Like an idiot, probably why I don't watch.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:53 PM
1

Robots don't fare well in trades, manufacturing sure, but not trades.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:47 PM
1

After I watched that I had the impression that Cenk wasn't really being serious and was just doing a Colbertesque satirical representation of a raging feminist. He let her talk, a lot, which is good.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:40 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:20 PM
1

There's all sorts of stupid in this article, it's worth the read for a laugh. However: It's a girls hockey league, not women. Nowhere in the article does it mention that coaches are mostly male, where did you get this information.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:07 PM
1

I think this is counterproductive to men's future in having a fair place in politics and business.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:52 PM
5

Repost http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2up9kv/cenk_uygur_butts_heads_with_mens_rights_activist/
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:20 AM
4

I dunno if he was serious or not, he wasn't even trying, just throwing out cliches that karen has heard many times before. He let her talk a lot, and only acted like a troll for a bit.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:11 AM
2

Bingo, very well written.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:33 PM
1

MHRA vs MGTOW
/r/MensRights01/02/15 07:17 PM
2

At 3 months, you will need to have a plan for gradually increasing time and overnight visitation. Be aware of her concerns and prepared to counter them in court with your parenting plan that is focused on the child. At the very minimum you can establish regular visitations the length of her work shifts ASAP and continue working on the longer plan to increase time. My ex was much the same and dragged things out, but she embarrassed herself in court. It took time, but I had full weekends at 18 mon…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:51 PM
1

I don't think this is limited to just single mothers, married mothers can/do act exactly the same.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:08 PM
1

Cool, good luck in your studies.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:20 AM
14

It's pretty bad when the mindset of the prosecution is guilty until proven innocent rather than impartial evaluation of objective facts.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:15 AM
2

Men are taught to be violent and aggressive for the protection and provision of women and children. Men are not taught to be violent and aggressive for the sake of just hurting people. Same as with women, the "toxic" aspects implied are an aberration and not the result of traditional aspects of gender.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:12 AM
2

Great story, what is "human factors and relations"? Never heard of it and wondering why/how it is "almost an all guy class"?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:08 AM
18

There's nothing stopping anyone from getting involved in discussions here.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:51 PM
2

Redditor for only 1 month. Give it some time.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:46 PM
1

I think they're crafty opportunists. Exhibit A, Jian Ghomeshi, Exhibit B, Hugo Schwyzer
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:19 AM
1

treatment of male DV victims (who are btw the majority of DV victims) http://smu.edu/experts/study-documents/family-violence-study-may2006.pdf Link is dead. Can anyone provide a back up or explanation of size, methodology etc.?
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:04 PM
1

At 14 and 15, I'm surprised that they don't get to choose which parent they live with. But, it's Dr. Phil so I also wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing was staged.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 09:59 PM
2

Women don't "have to", having babies is still a viable option.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 01:31 AM
1

All cosmo has is sex tips and make up advice! She's a fucking troll.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:31 PM
5

They don't want to be treated as equals in the board room. They want affirmative action and the privilege of speaking first.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:29 PM
2

There's lots of examples, like affirmative action in the board room or women needing to be protected from bad words.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:24 PM
3

Every single time they need a hand out and a leg up. It's as if they think women can't accomplish anything on their own.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:12 PM
7

Lots of treating men like mindless animals too. It reminds me a lot of redpill.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:07 PM
3

If she makes as much as you A minority is an exception to the rule. Most women still marry up.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:48 PM
4

The difference is, while feminists will typically only look at the ways being viewed as children hurt them, and leave the other ways alone, I worry about how women being treated as children negatively impacts men. It's weird, like feminists want it both ways but sometimes they want to be treated like adults, sometimes they want to be treated like helpless children.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:45 PM
8

I view redpill as cosmopolitan for men. I don't consider it any less/more offensive as cosmopolitan for women. I'm still undecided on if men and women are equal, since no two individuals are ever equal to each other.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:43 PM
2

Somewhere in there, she might have a point. I would certainly agree with vocational options in high school. However, even 30+ years ago high school did not provide full training in any trade, it was still not trade school. In a lot of trades the real key is getting in a union. Are you an HVAC? Well fuck, I hope not, I have that in my basement and it's not a person. Anyway, I LOLed because it just confirmed that my thoughts that she was rambling and disconjoined. Clearly, she doesn't know much ab…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:32 AM
20

Don't make statements on the internet. They can be used against you as evidence. Delete this post and get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:55 PM
4

Just some friendly advice. Look through the resources on the side bar, figure out what topics you want to write about, do some preliminary research and then come back and ask for sources on specific topics.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:53 PM
1

A quick search using the search bar found this as the top item.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:55 PM
2

Yep, they're used a lot by dumb trolls who frequent this sub. Have another downvote.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:24 PM
3

Redditor for 1 month, first post to /r/mensrights Downvotes are hostile huh? Have a downvote.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:22 PM
1

I've run into them before, got to turn them down rudely when I found out. Edit: The women I do know and like don't mind when people disagree with them, sometimes they learn something too.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:40 AM
1

That was my initial suspicion, thanks for the fact checking.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:38 AM
1

She doesn't want you contacting her and stated it in her profile. Do you contact religious people to dispel their beliefs too? Or vice versa, would you preach the gospel to atheists who state clearly in their profile they are not interested? It's not a debate club, it's for like minded people to get together.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 12:59 AM
1

It usually better that they tell me what's up so that I can help to resolve their problems before it turns into a fight.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:24 PM
2

My children are starting to learn that two wrongs don't make it right and that revenge is not the same as fairness.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 10:36 PM
5

So because the people in power are mostly male, they use their powers to benefit men over women Proof?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:58 PM
2

Depends on how it is taught and if it reflects criminal law or aspirations of activists.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:47 PM
3

Criminal law is federal jurisdiction. This is an attempt at propoganda and the current Ontario liberal government is unlikely to be swayed. Edit: They are moving forward with this: http://affirmativeconsent.com/consent-news/ontario-include-consent-updated-sex-education-curriculum/
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:01 PM
2

They need to change the conscription act. It's not in force, but it still exists and can be used.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 06:05 AM
1

I suppose, but I do prefer the funny trolls over the just plain stupid ones. This one is pretty dumb, but I still laughed.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:04 PM
1

Upvote for being a funny troll.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:43 PM
1

Best interests of the children!
/r/MensRights17/01/15 02:47 PM
1

I don't remember the exact conversation, but my recollection is that he was not trying to get rid of us, but rather admitting that he had done everything he could and that it was our responsibility to put it into action.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:41 PM
1

In hindsight, I think he realized that counselling had limits, especially with irrational people. He was probably doing me a favor, but I wish he had been more up front and honest.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:38 PM
1

She checked out of the relationship and wasn't committed to any change on her part, he recognized that and he also recognized that counselling had limits. Crazy can't be reasoned with. She can be argued with, but that doesn't help.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:34 PM
1

At the time it was quite surprising. I thought we were making some progress with the exercises and it was becoming more apparent that we needed help what areas we needed to work on. However, in hindsight he was absolutely correct and I wish he were more straightforward and honest.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:29 PM
4

I went to marriage counselling. He seemed reasonable, the exercises weren't bad. However, the moment he was critical of my wife (you're not understanding what he is trying to tell you), she blew up at him and had a fit. Counselling ended with.."I'm sorry, there is nothing else I can do to help you"
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:12 AM
1

IMO, you're correct about the difficulty of doing the right thing, but your suggestion of having the mother name the father does absolutely nothing to reduce/prevent paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:10 PM
1

Thanks, this will be helpful as an example of why I don't trust MSocs.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:42 AM
2

Maybe there's a way but I can never seem to view disqus comments on mobile. Maybe there's an app for that.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:19 PM
12

FYI, I reported one an hour ago. It was a new account with "MRA" in the username. The doxxing target was an offsite username that was identified as feminist. There were no further details as to who that person was.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:38 PM
1

Which was pretty much what the video was about, except for the unnecessary inclusion of Paul.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:52 AM
3

Meh, you're exaggerating. Paul had to pander to the tradcon women to maintain his harem, meanwhile trying to redefine/create his own MGTOW movement to exclude the marriage strike. He didn't really belong among the list of manginas, but Paul and his gang of harpies aren't particularly nice either.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:40 AM
3

Earlier reports were that the complainant was a third party, not the alleged victim. They kept the whole team under suspicion for months during the investigation and they were pressured to rat out who did it.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:43 AM
2

To simplify, a male feminist will minimize and ignore legal and support issues and will blame all men's problems on the socialization of men. Men are the fault of our own problems, it's victim blaming.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:35 AM
0

It's not a good word, but it's a pretty good list tho.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:30 AM
0

Wow, Matt Binder's winning by a long shot.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:29 AM
5

Even if they did allow comments they would be heavily censored at CBC. The Globe and Mail also closed comments. Not much justification since it isn't a jury trial. Go to the National Post instead http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/01/13/university-of-ottawa-hockey-players-plan-lawsuit-over-sex-assault-allegations-suspensions/
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:44 PM
3

FYI, Allan Rock, president of Uof0 was federal Liberal Justice Minister (1993–1997)
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:08 PM
2

There are plenty of ways to lose trust besides cheating. Some lies are manageable, some aren't. I don't see trust as entirely black and white, Some friends are trustworthy to different extents. Lifelong monogamy seems to be more of a romantic illusion these days. Personal note, my best friend is a woman who I do trust with a lot, but I still would never marry her and I am very hesitant to allow her to move in with me. That's not because of her, but rather because of common law.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:02 PM
1

Jealousy is quite normal, but I don't think it's conducive to happiness. A life long relationship is mostly just a romantic fantasy these days. You need to be realistic about your expectations of others.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:45 PM
1

You know what really surprises me is that anybody actually trusts ANY complete strangers before they get to know them. Granted there are greater hurdles for trust in an intimate relationship, but I tend to think that trust should be earned by actions and experience.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:40 PM
3

Apparently the law* mandates 1:1 space in toilets, which means there will be more fixtures in the gents' due to the compactness of urinals Are you really that fucking stupid? There is NEVER more fixtures for the gents.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:45 PM
4

She was charged with sexual exploitation, the title makes sense. There is no "rape" charge in canadian law. Police said Monday that an adult educational assistant initiated an inappropriate relationship with a student between March and October of last year. Needs an editor.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:08 AM
7

Those queues are because women take much longer on the toilet than men do in a urinal. Just read the building codes, high volume occupancies like theaters have 1.5 times the water closets for women.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:50 AM
3

There is never more more water closets for men than women. For an office building there should be 1 water closet per 25 people up to 50 and 1 per 50 people thereafter. One stall and a urinal is only good for an occupancy of 50 men.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:48 AM
11

Urinals are a great space saver and very efficient time use and low water use. I think they're awesome. Also, I get to show off my dick to the guy next to me.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:44 AM
2

Because urinals, only women's washrooms have only private stalls and don't need to be segregated.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:42 AM
7

Yep, there's some hick counties that still have their own building codes and people who like to make up fictional numbers, like yourself in your previous post. To be clear, for high volume occupancies like theatres and such, there are about 1.5x the number of women's water closets. However, in lower volume office type environments, the total number of water closets are usually equal. That would mean if there was ten total waterclosets for each of men and women, the men could have 4 water closets…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:37 AM
10

That's not how the building code works. Most jurisdictions use the uniform building code which allows substitution of up to 67% of water closets for urinals. Women get more water closets depending on the occupancy type, otherwise it's the same. However, urinals are much faster and sometimes more can be installed in the same floor area, hence the shorter line ups. Edit: clarification
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:54 PM
1

It starts with a lot of unsupported conjecture that would never be taken seriously. Also, mandatory arrest policies always increase the number of arrests, that doesn't mean that family violence is increasing.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 04:42 AM
1

The youtube videos of big red and fucking scum girl show who the hate group is. There's no reason to worry about false accusations by some obvious nutters who don't have any evidence of their claims.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:06 AM
1

That's a reason to avoid marriage altogether, it's not a solution.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:38 PM
1

That's also a losing game for men. The fact that your original post included women's right to the option to stay at home and then your previous statement that it's not a rights issue but a relationship issue leads me to believe that you are disingenious. I'm going to drop this conversation.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:51 PM
0

Men can say anything they want, but have zero power in a relationship to decide if a woman works or not. Probably your feminist leanings that distorts the reality of power in a relationship. It's irrelevant what you think is or isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:43 PM
-1

You say if "both partners are okay" but men have no say in the matter. Lot of should's but there's plenty of women looking for early retirement. Let's get beyond that and back to the original point. How do we make equal rights contingent on equal responsibilities?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:30 PM
2

basic male rights When did that ever happen?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:38 PM
-2

Well, I'm not talking about a man having his masculinity questioned. The current reality is that women have that option and expect their husbands to pick up the slack. Some men are okay with this, some don't have any other choice because it's her option.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:37 PM
6

•I also believe that if a woman wants to be a stay-at-home mom and fulfill traditional gender roles than that is her option and she should not be chastised or made to feel "oppressed" because of that. How does that jive with your opinion of men and women being treated equally while women always have the option to opt out of work? Shouldn't equal rights also include equal responsibilities?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:11 PM
1

No, she's obligated to transport them as written in the court order because she moved away to live with her bf, still doesn't work, lives off child support. Got a good lawyer, spent a lot of money getting a detailed agreement written up. She refused mediation, made a fool of herself in court. She's a very difficult person and likes to cause problems by never being on time and always hours late and never telling me anything about the kids. She simply would not relent on sharing christmas morning …
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:20 AM
20

That's just a drop in the bucket and as shown in this post many get away with it for years.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:57 AM
0

Pay no mind to the mommy deadbeats entitled to their entitlements.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:59 PM
1

Does your mom have a job or is she a deadbeat mom?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:58 PM
-5

I wouldn't trust a babble article. I've heard about this before but there isn't much other than anecdotes to make it any more than urban legend.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:40 PM
8

It's a non-sequitur that devolves into pointless victim olympics. Fact is there are a significant number of fathers being prevented from being involved with their children's lives and that is the higher priority rather than portraying all fathers as disinterested.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:43 PM
4

This will be an interesting case to follow. I don't think the HRC has ever made a judgement in the favour of a man for sexism.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:05 PM
4

He eviscerates them.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:18 AM
1

I suppose that makes sense for people from religious backgrounds. My parents weren't serious about religion, but occasionally thought it a good idea to send us to church and I did explore different religions when I was a teen, but nothing seemed right. I've known a lot of non-practicing catholics and they're cool, they know they're hypocrites and I probably know the bible better than most of them. It's the evangelicals, baptists, mormons and jehovahs witnesses that are in your face and annoying.…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:24 PM
3

I'm making turkey, kids are supposed to arrive 2 hrs ago per court order, probably won't arrive till very late so that my christmas dinner is suitably interrupted and I'm left waiting as usual. Got any good recipes for stuffing or mixed drink ideas for cinnamon whisky? Edit: 5 hours late, should I eat, should I wait, should I post date her january check very late?
/r/MensRights25/12/14 07:42 PM
1

You made a valiant effort, but that is one of the pitfalls of attacking feminism as an idea, you are attacking the popular notion of equality. It's much better to deal with specific issues. The guys seem a bit like simpletons and they kept cutting you off. It was strange that they didn't even discuss the religious origins of "patriarchy", which is a male led church and male led families. It takes a leap of faith to translate these historical origins as the reason for less women being elected and…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:22 PM
13

It is ridiculous, it's a photoshopped fake.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:57 PM
7

Your comments are far more interesting than the article and you seem to know how this all went down. Would you mind doing a self-post to explain the background behind this meninist twitter?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 09:41 PM
2

Still sounds like the old feminism.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:58 PM
2

Excellent letter. Please add tag for "action opportunity"
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:55 PM
8

That's a spamming issue. Try serious discussion sometime.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:42 PM
1

Other than a few chuckles, it seems like a big waste of time.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:31 PM
1

Good explaination.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:11 PM
25

Is there an environment where people are free to discuss ideas without fear of being banned or something like that? You're here.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:02 PM
1

Thanks, I'll read it later.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:55 PM
1

Man, you're fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:52 PM
1

Yes, I am. Let's be clear about one thing. I stayed exactly on topic, you derailed.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:43 PM
9

Normally I downvote these "I was banned" posts, but this is a good discussion. Edit: This is what OP got banned for: Sorry but as a feminist it saddens me how someone can hold such an extreme point of view. Do you ask yourself why feminists are so hated and attacked these days? My guess is because some people are supporting censorship and extreme measures to solve an nonexistent problem (misogyny in the video game community). I became a feminist to fight for equal rights for everyone, not to sil…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:38 PM
4

I can't read this article at work, but I just want to point out that in the Mouse Utopia experiment it was overpopulation that led to a breakdown of social structures. So, I don't follow how this is used to justify gender roles.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:25 PM
1

You won't because you CAN'T.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:06 PM
4

That's typically how it goes when debating with ideologues.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:02 PM
1

It sounds like you're derailing and projecting. I just asked a simple question. I don't have anything to prove to you, you're the one who can't substantiate your own claim.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:57 PM
1

Oh, I'm not derailing, I just asked a simple question. You're the one getting all pissy with the drama.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:49 PM
1

Not a fan, but these people love the negative attention they receive. I'm sure he would be ecstatic if you would set up an anti-david wong subreddit and popularized it. The worst thing you could do to some so unimportant, is ignore them.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:47 PM
2

I suppose it could, that would test the case law for whether 15(2) was applicable to the specific industry or society as a whole.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:46 PM
1

So, you make factual statements and then get all pissy when somebody calls you out on it. Just admit that it's either untrue or unsubstantiated. Either way, it's a belief system.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:35 PM
1

Almost sounds like a David Wong sockpuppet desperate for attention.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:32 PM
1

How about unsubstantiated? I'm quite interested in the evidence, I've even researched it in the past and talked to a few doctors about it. Everything that I found showed that if it did happen, then it only happened in isolated incidents and was not common practice or even policy.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:29 PM
1

No big deal, I already know that you CAN'T provide a source to such claims that are not true.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:23 PM
1

No credible sources from a google search. Seems to be a belief system that you are unable to support with facts.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:15 PM
0

That's interesting. Can you explain the context of the joke, or why it is funny?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:05 PM
1

Yes, I'm well informed. Rationalism has nothing to do with catering to prevailaing beliefs. Edit: Would Descarte ever have proposed the emancipation from church doctrine if he were catering to his audience?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:03 PM
1

but many doctors won't do it without her approval. I've heard this before as an anecdote, but no evidence to suggest that it is common medical practice. Do you have a source of this claim?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:56 PM
2

On what basis? This is allowed under section 15(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rgiths.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:53 PM
1

He won't know unless he tries. If it becomes an issue then he can go doctor shoping.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:45 PM
1

You need to read up about the philosophy of rationalism. You are misinformed and making statements that are simply not true.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:37 PM
1

She wants kids and you don't. That's not an evil motivation, it's just natural. You are at high risk of having and "oops" baby, maybe that is her intention, but still somewhat irrelevant. Your only choices are to use your own contraception (condoms), stop having sex or have a vasectomy. I highly recommend the vasectomy, they are even reversable with good success rate.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:30 PM
2

redditor for 20 minutes
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:35 PM
2

There is no war, stop exaggerating.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:03 AM
1

Hey, I'm not really angry at you, just playing because it was such a stupid idea that I couldn't take it seriously. Still can't. Still think your missing out the big differences between training dogs and influencing humans. Figured I'd just piss all over your leg and help you learn.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:59 AM
2

I apologize, naive idiot it is then. BTW, I love pets.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:41 AM
1

I think you're an asshole because you are trying to train us for your own agenda. What happens if we just bite your leg and piss on your shoe? What then? Also, fuck you for not answering my question about which words you wanted to ban.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:40 AM
2

I think you're an asshole, GTFO.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:33 AM
2

The only one who cares is YOU. Simple solution is to GTFO and go back where you came.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:31 AM
2

Well, I think your just being disrespectful with your accusations and false dichotomies. I tried explaining to you that it was unworkable, if not impossible to implement. Also, your war analogies are stupid, this is reddit. If you don't like words, get off the fucking internet.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:10 AM
2

Sounds like a shit ton of work, which words do you want to ban? Too many trolls here for that to work effectively, I'm on my own side. Edit: If I had to choose, I'd take the allies.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:11 AM
2

“I’ve done some thinking about that, but the answer is no. Everyone knows this is a house that does not respect women. They are part of the problem, and I do not feel bad. We have an objective set of laws that empowers the police to kill black men with impunity and protects white rapists at U.Va. from prosecution. The laws are only legitimate when they work. This is not a particularly radical campus, but we’re mad. “As a college student, I know a lot of people who have been the result of direct …
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:39 AM
1

Probably a little too explosive to suggest something other than the prevailing narrative. Don't do this, but just imagine the heads exploding: Prejudice Linked to Women's Menstrual Cycle
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:17 AM
4

There's no way you can really prove they did it on purpose or not, but gold diggers do exist. There isn't much of any deterrent and making babies becomes a livable lifestyle for some.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:12 AM
1

Well, they've already got the female management wrapped up, they just need some workers.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:00 AM
0

She knows I'm talking about MSocs and trying to wrap herself in a blanket of usefulness to substantiate her existence and paycheck.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:38 AM
3

FWIW, here's an interesting link that was posted a while back. Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:35 AM
2

I'm all for it, we need more women like this and less SJWs.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:11 AM
1

It's just not really science, more of pseudo science. Interesting hobby and stuff, but not really useful for anything but a government job. Edit: Nice try with getting paid to help others, that's volunteerism. Edit: All people in humanities are stupid? No, only if they have firm beliefs in the subject matter social psuedosciences. I've met some excellent male and female social workers and nurses Of course, learning psuedoscience does not make one a bad person, or a good person either. Think twic…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:58 AM
0

Heros is a bit much, but damn I love smart women, not those stupid humanities types.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:45 AM
2

Really good comment worth reading.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:14 PM
2

I feel sorry for the poor kids that crazy gets her claws into.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:10 PM
2

I just want to know because a local mom at my kids school looks so much like her. If it is, I will introduce myself next time.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:13 PM
2

Can you post link in comments or maybe without http?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:35 PM
2

Okay, I laughed, but when she mentioned that women are cleaner, he missed an opportune joke about kitchens.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:06 PM
1

I guess I would have to pick up a gun and kill things. /s These stupid macho games stopped being interesting when I was a kid.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:02 PM
6

I just figured that might be something important for a professional regulatory body and that a public prosecutor would be concerned about public confidence in the legal system.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 01:27 AM
5

Are you aware that the American Bar Association is perpetuating myths? How can the public be confident that lawyers are properly trained?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:47 AM
3

It's going to be interesting what comes of the FBI investigation.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:07 PM
5

Holy shit. I'm stunned that this was investigated by The Star. Heads will explode.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:30 PM
1

Well, things have gone well beyond twitter activism for one. Do some research.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:49 PM
2

This really shouldn't be a surprise to anyone except male feminists. Hello AMR!
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:41 PM
1

It does not appear that you are very well informed about the MRM. Hashtags don't make things happen.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:33 PM
1

Well, everybody knows it, including the marketers who are taking big risks getting on board the feminist bandwagon male blame.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:02 PM
1

Gamers are not a monolith, same as any other group. Gamergate has a focus and it isn't about all gamers.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:45 PM
5

How is it divisive to suggest that farmville, candycrush and angry birds has nothing to do with gamergate?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:39 PM
8

OK, as I understand it, you are claiming there is a double standard about name calling. However, you also seem to insinuate that name calling against fathers is allowed, but offer no evidence. Further, the explanation for not allowing name calling in that particular subreddit makes a good point. Can you address that?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:36 PM
7

I was perusing that subreddit a while back and I couldn't help but notice that most of the complaints and discussions are about mothers. Mods from a popular abuse subreddit remove some negative posts about abusive women while all negative posts about men remain. Where is the evidence of this claim?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:32 PM
2

Yes it does matter, especially in the context of gamergate which is primarily about male dominated game genres.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:21 PM
1

It's cute when outsiders suggest what others should be doing for them. That's not how it works though. If you think you have a good idea then post an action opportunity. If it is a good idea then others will follow.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:14 PM
5

Some game genres are female dominated, some are male dominated. They're not all the same.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:10 PM
2

Why? Ending due process would increase the conviction rate and encourage more women to report to police if their accusations were less likely to be critically questioned. If they truly believe that women don't lie about rape then there is no risk of it hurting men they know.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:06 PM
3

Very good read, Baskerville is in top form.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:03 PM
5

The MRM has made many gains by becoming issues based rather than fighting an overall "culture war". The overall "culture war" is an ideological battle. This subreddit is not an organization, it's a discussion board with no leaders. As far as thought policing goes, r/mensrights has far more diversity of thought than r/redpill and ROK. Some people prefer a big tent rather than an ideological echo chamber.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:01 PM
0

It's pretty nasty what they do to boys in Africa and in North America they call it labiaplasty and it's elective cosmetic surgery for adult women.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:02 AM
2

I'm not really a gamer but I agree with everything you wrote and I recognized the potential of gamergate early and the synergy with Mensrights. This is all good, the rising tide floats all boats. Edit: Gamergate also exposed me to more analysis of feminist media in gaming and Brietbart. Milo's awesome, I'm a fan. You've also gained support and exposure, I could not help but respond to journalist bias in mainstream media and drop links for gamergate.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:37 PM
1

Oh sure, the article would be about hot party girls rather than the boring plain Jane. She's just trying to shop around for better options while she's young and have some fun.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:01 AM
1

Sorry, it's a sub-reddit called change my view.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:20 AM
1

Maybe, like "I'm an indoctrinated textbook feminist robot, CMV".
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:52 AM
2

These group homes are the worst place ever for children, all too often children put in foster homes get it worse than where they came from.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:33 AM
2

He's Canadian, common law in all provinces except Quebec.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:22 AM
1

Judging by comment history, [s]he is not interested in engaging in serious discussion.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:00 AM
3

It's not and it's been posted many times.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:57 PM
-2

but provide no evidence to back that up It's quite possible or even likely that such evidence is not known at this time and the article was only including the known facts and claims. Of course, the victim can not speak in his own defense.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:56 PM
2

Good grief! Are you having a laugh? Most likely. OP's comment history shows repetition of feminist talking points and a lack of [serious] discussion.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:52 PM
1

This is a good thing that more mothers are being ensnared in the system that typically benefits them.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:43 PM
4

I vote based on quality of post, sorry.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:25 PM
4

That's so dumb, he's completely neglected that women are responsible for the high divorce rate and the effect of single mothers on criminality.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 09:37 PM
4

You should see a lawyer before you move in together to draft an agreement. Generally, anything that you can prove was purchased with your own money (credit card statement, receipts, etc.) is yours. As soon as you get married, you just gave her half of your house.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:26 PM
2

Very good video. Julie Borowski rebuttal video at 2:55 link?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:36 AM
1

This is not representative of anybody, except a very small and rare minority of sociopaths. However, the court system is adversarial and alienating in nature and surely does not help in aggravating existing mental illness. I'm rather curious about his records at the VA and if he was diagnosed and getting help.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:41 AM
2

It is NOT intended to be serious. The original was intended to be a parody of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:27 AM
2

Not much point in contacting the Globe and Mail, they're the same type of gender bigots that would deny you a vote.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:25 AM
12

With laughter. When everything is misogyny, the word loses all meaning.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:10 PM
3

Yes, Yes, Yes, No.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:02 AM
1

Well yeah, but I really wanted to see him explode.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:32 AM
1

You lied about unkle Bernie.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:01 AM
2

I'm not going to listen to 10 seconds of dude with a bag on his head. Edit: lovelinecompanion huh? probably trollin.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:49 AM
5

Those four women were just smashing teh patriarchie
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:45 AM
3

That requires two conditions. A woman willing to proudly support a man at home and not use the nuclear option of abuse allegations in family court.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:25 AM
15

Holy shit, that gave me flashbacks. I hope you're gonna be okay man. The kids? It would be so much easier to just cut ties with crazy.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:18 AM
6

Further to your point, if mommy works part time at 32 hours a week, daddy works full time at 40 hours a week, comes home and does all the housework and childcare while mommy sits around watching TV, mommy still gets full custody. Daddy gets to see his kids for 13%.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 11:20 PM
0

Berta Lovejoy is a troll from le reddit armie.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:06 PM
8

My lawyer explained to me that a judge will never impose 50/50 custody, simply because the court litigation is evidence of a lack of cooperation. Better solution is to start with a presumption of shared parenting and judgements that side with the more cooperative parent. Best interests of the children, but bad for lawyers.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:07 PM
3

Probably good advice but the issue is the adversarial nature of family court and the sole custody judgements. Shared parenting is in the best interests of the child.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:41 PM
2

Very far from perfect, they're talking about co-opting the men's centre with feminist programs. Horrible graphic. On the positive side, the new men's centre is doing well and offering programs to help men.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:37 AM
0

Well newb, perhaps you can provide some responses to your low quality shitpost that are deemed acceptable. Nobody else is responding because there is no "we".
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:23 AM
2

That is just a wee bit disrespectful from someone on this subreddit for a fortnight to someone who has been here for literally 4ever. Actually, it's just plain projection. I actually answered your last query and you didn't like my answer. I tried explaining to you why it nobody took interest, that it was a poorly designed survey, that you were evasive about it's purpose, that you don't understand how the internet works. /r/mensrights is not a group, there is no "we", it is a news agglomerator su…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:07 AM
3

It just makes it an ideological echo chamber, same as a safe space.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:09 PM
3

I think "safe spaces" are ball-less, both TRP and AVFM.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:43 PM
1

He's hung up on some very minor issues.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:42 PM
2

I disagree, I think TRP's stance is ball-less.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:13 PM
5

There is no club. Assuming there is shows how naive you are about the internet.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:26 PM
2

on r/mensrights for ~10 days + fake statistics = troll
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:17 PM
0

Great idea, go do it. Build a following and make it happen. You don't help anyone by telling them to do it for you.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:16 PM
4

why are we spending 90% of our time attacking feminism? Source? Who is "we"?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:34 PM
3

They're not our leadership. Stop whining.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:19 PM
1

This is a fun debate, I'm right here, not hiding. So, do you spend all your time in your mom's basement making jpegs and spamming internet sites? You should get out sometime son, it's not good for your health. Edit: Adults don't LOLOL, that's for children. Going to sleep, come on back if you need more guidance on social competence. God sake, learn how to converse with people. Practice, practice, practice, but first you have to get out of your basement and out in the real world.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:25 AM
1

I'm waiting for the debate about social competence. Keep talking, more, more, more. You're winning it for me. Are you even tougher and scarier on webcam? Edit: Whats with the LOLOL, are you a 14 year old girl?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:17 AM
1

r u gay Going to sleep soon loser, you can't even set the terms of terms of the debate and you have a strange homoerotic fixation with your webcam, behind a computer where you can pretend to be an internet tough guy all the while saying nothing of any value, any intelligence, any competence. 0% social competence, 100% loser, you fail!
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:02 AM
1

Still waiting, but not for long. Speak up or shut up coward.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:49 AM
2

This is important, this is not
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:33 AM
2

Give me your address and we'll do this in person. Otherwise don't pussy out, I'm not going to wait all night. I'm right here, you're right here. Where do you disagree with what I said? What are we debating? Don't get scared and run away now. Right here, right now coward, nobody is censoring you.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:21 AM
1

I'm right here, you're right here. Where do you disagree with what I said? What are we debating? Don't get scared and run away now.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:35 AM
2

Yes, one does not preclude the other. Men are both the greatest idiots and the greatest geniuses.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:28 AM
1

I find it rather amusing. You're a great troll, because you're funny.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:26 AM
1

Derp.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:25 AM
0

What more do you expect from a joke study?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:03 AM
2

I'm waiting for his reply. I just don't want him to be a coward pussy and slink back to MA whining that the MRAs are so mean to him. I want him to demonstrate his "social competence" See what I did there?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:58 AM
1

Another damn good response. view porn as "cheating" to a degree My ex-wife was like this, she even viewed masterbation as cheating, mostly because she was trying to control me by offering sex as a reward. I highly doubt most guys are avoiding their gf by using porn, it's just that it's less effort when/if women expect you to jump through hoops and aren't expected/don't make similar effort in relationships. Yes, I think women are a weak link in relationships because they become used to being cour…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:49 AM
2

The first hint is in the headline: "tongue-and-cheek study"
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:31 AM
1

That's irrelevant, I'm not a feminist. Everything is misogyny to them.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:13 AM
3

Why is it misandry to joke about men doing stupid things?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:44 AM
1

That was a really good reply. I have a large unit and women get frustrated when they can't make me cum, but that's not necessary. My last gf was disturbed that I manscaped and wanted her to trim the forest. I was mostly asking about the porn angle in women's sexual insecurities.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:36 AM
2

I've read that, it's not very useful. I'm not a pick up slut or a radical tradcon and I have no interest in either. Edit: Need to add a chapter on teaching women to give proper blowjobs.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:51 AM
2

This question needs to be addressed. I've noticed that some women don't really enjoy sucking dick and they often aren't that good at it. My experience only, but is this a hang up for many women? What's with women who are pro-gay, yet so anti-anal? I get a sense that some women are anti-porn because they don't want to be expected to perform. Straw poll!
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:36 AM
1

Great post. Does this imply that slut walks might be a good thing for "equality" or that shaming men is? Or both?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:45 AM
2

I'm more concerned that this is not a healthy way to deal with your trauma.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:32 PM
2

What do you get out of sharing these stories and having other people comment on your experiences?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:32 PM
1

How can you analyze opposing sides if you neglect the origins?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:58 AM
1

Jewish chicks think it looks better. Intended to control male lust and masterbation.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:17 AM
1

I don't find arguing about branding or propaganda to be very important or interesting of a debate. It is what is is, both good and bad because of it's actions, not what people choose to believe. Surely, there is a specific issue that is relevant to the discussion?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:15 AM
2

I don't see this as an important issue, I don't see any efforts to get more women started as laborers in heavy construction or men involved in teaching and nursing. Also, who is "we" and why is this related to men's rights?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:44 AM
1

They're supposed to allow all criticism as long as it's on point, well written and respectable. Granted, there are some very biased rags that are insecure of any criticism at all.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:40 AM
1

Letters to the editor don't have to agree with their ideology. That's what the letters section is for.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 11:38 PM
2

Are you sure it's the same guy? I thought it was KC Johnson that exposed Nifong.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 11:34 PM
1

The editor shouldn't need encouragement to publish the letter. It's well written, the editor should publish it. However, IMO the Ottawa Citizen is one of the most religiously gynocentric publications in Canada. I don't even read that rag anymore.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 10:35 PM
3

Usually qualifications for coaching and scouting are also based on experience.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 10:11 PM
2

Maybe you can fill in the blanks then, because this "time-period" you are referring to does not appear to be significant.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 10:09 PM
2

It depends which country you are referring to. I think the time period you are talking about for the UK only lasted for about 11 years. Where I live, there was never any such period. Female landowners were given the right to vote before chinese and before male non-landowners.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:52 PM
1

I don't think it makes any sense to open up one position in the game, just because women "might" be able to do it. Although, I'm not opposed to it either, it would mostly be a publicity stunt. However, that still detracts from your post that more women players would make more women eligible/experienced to be sports hosts. There would still only be a very small number of women players and they wouldn't have as broad of experience at playing the game.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:42 PM
1

Professional football has the best players available, women's best players would not make the team. They'll do fine if they get their own league, but I doubt it will be popular or financially self sufficient.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:57 PM
0

I am amused that you believe women will play in the NFL some day.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:45 PM
0

Troll confirmed.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:28 PM
12

The slut walks were created by a strawman. A Toronto Police officer advised college women to not dress slutty to avoid sexual assault. Now, he didn't blame them, he was genuinely trying to give good advice, but slutwalks were born.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:25 PM
1

Maybe you or your sockpuppet can just provide the source for your editorialized title.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:10 PM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:46 PM
2

It's objectification but I'm not a feminist and I don't want to act like feminists.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:45 PM
1

Where did it say or even imply that "It's all men's fault!"
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:43 PM
1

That's just opinion. The evidence is that feminists are strawmanning women's need to consider their own precautions for personal safety as rape culture. Attack the (bad) opinion on it's merits, not as a strawman.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:18 PM
1

I'm not talking about ideas, you are obfuscating the singular event with the Toronto cop that created slutwalk, which was a strawman. Also, pony up evidence or you are a fraud.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:01 PM
2

I can examine the evidence of what created slut walks, it is public knowledge. I can examine the evidence of feminist framing of "don't teach women to not dress/act/be slutty, teach men not to rape". Edit: Framing it in terms of womens clothes, leads people to blame women because of the way they dressed Evidence, I demand evidence, especially after this arrogant statement: There are gaps in your knowledge about it and therefore you cannot examine the evidence.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:54 PM
2

Lets look at the evidence from slut walk. It was created after a Toronto cop suggested to some college girls that they not dress slutty. At no time did he suggest or was it his intention to blame women for rape. The validity of his advice is irrelevant, he was 100% trying to teach women to protect themselves. Bad advice is not evidence of blaming women, yet the slutwalk strawman was born.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:46 PM
2

Are you really that obtuse that you are parroting the feminist framing of the issue and strawman of blaming women for rape? Keep wacking those strawmen, Slutwalks were built on it.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:04 PM
1

Maybe, but poor quality criticism + editorializing title = don't read + downvote
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:02 PM
1

I'm not following you buddy. I've been here much longer. There is no reason to trust newbs, you're just going to have to learn and be more honest with people for them to trust you.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:48 PM
1

Well, you're newb in a group of guys so don't expect special treatment. This isn't an organization, it's an internet forum, I'm not interested in being exclusive, but I'm also not going to pander to playing victim over minor criticism. I would like to repeat that my intention is not to be mean to you or drive you away but rather to be up front and honest. Maybe it's you that would prefer a more exclusive club that will praise your every effort and shield you from every minor criticism?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:21 PM
3

Got it, troll confirmed and reported.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:11 PM
3

Not sure if sarcasm, troll or really fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:10 PM
1

I'll try to explain to be helpful. Don't get overly offended, because IDGAF. Fact is, nobody responded because this list is a complete fail. The first step in your failure is the fact that you did not explain the purpose to get others on board. Other fact is, you are newb, nobody is going to automatically trust you.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 06:00 PM
1

Physical age is not important, it's just that you are so obviously newb and overly sensitive.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 05:55 PM
1

Toughen up kid, you have plenty to learn. Don't think for a second that I'm trying to be mean to you, I'm just being blunt. You don't really want to live life taking offense at everything people say do you? If you disagree with something come right out and say it. IDGAF.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:09 AM
1

Oh man, don't take things so personally. Other people have other definitions of these things based on their own life experiences. That doesn't mean that I'm projecting my experience on your label of "socialist". Notice, my first question was to define liberal and asking you what your label meant to you?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:59 AM
2

I have never really understood that term to mean anything other than "not a social conservative".
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:54 AM
1

Oh don't be such a victim, we're just telling personal stories. Are you a dude, because dudes take shots at each other quite regularly and don't get all pissy about it. I'm not confusing anything, I've been involved in these social issues for a long time now and I was very young and naive in thinking that the actual "socialist party" cared about social issues, since like you said, that tends to be their thing.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:47 AM
0

I actually believed in social justice and my socialist workers party. Long time ago when I was young and so naive.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:36 AM
1

I'm a strong unionist, but I don't like the socialist label or the nutbars that come with it. Heh, I don't like the MRA label either.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:33 AM
2

Here's the thing though. Social conservatives and leftist socialists (SJW types) have the same propensity for controlling other people's social interactions. Edit: Although the "teabaggers" have a bad rap for some misteps by fringe extremists, they at least started as a libertarian ron paul types, also known as classic liberals.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:48 AM
1

What is a centrist socialist? Is that half way between a leftist socialist and a social conservative?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:45 AM
1

Define "Liberal". What country/region are you from, it makes a huge difference.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:40 AM
1

There's one point. I do not know what the list was constructed for and you are very resistant to explain it. If you were doing honest work, you would have very clearly explained it in your self post. I do however understand the various issues and the similarities and differences. I can also judge how you constructed your list as being useful to the purposes of activism or not.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:17 AM
1

You're not the only one talking to politicians and you haven't done anything. This is classic DARVO.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:14 AM
1

No, no, no. It shows that people recognize this as a pointless exercise and a poorly constructed list. It's also very likely that others suspect you are not entirely honest too.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:01 AM
1

I'm not being a jerk at all and fuck you for calling me one. I'm just giving my opinion that I don't think your little list is much value to anyone at all, particularly since you're surveying reddit, which is mostly representative of teenagers and trolls. Furthermore, when one approaches politicians, one does not lay down a list of issues, but rather addresses one issue at a time. That's how it's done, politicians don't have time. Also, politicians care about the local community, ie. their voter…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:59 AM
1

FYI, Zetamale did a survey like this several years ago for the GMP introduction to the MRM. It's a better list with greater participation. Go search for it.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:47 AM
0

I get heard with or without you. You don't represent anybody but yourself. Why did I comment? Because you're a newbie and I felt like it. Stick around, you might learn something.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:32 AM
1

You don't need this to talk to politicians. It has no practical use.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:25 PM
1

Well, I don't think your ranking system is all that important or useful at all. What are you planning on using if for that I should care anyway?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:25 PM
2

15 items in order of importance is a bit long. I also don't like prioritizing these as many of them I consider to be important and others maybe less important or perhaps something that is very difficult/near impossible to change, hence less concern from a pragmatic point of view. Important: B, C, D, F, H, I, J, N Less important: A, E, G, K, L, M, O
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:53 PM
1

There you go, it's a non issue and this convo you posted is really just nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:51 PM
3

I don't see a problem here. Your kids want IPODs for xmas. Get them or don't, it's your perogative.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:12 PM
4

That doesn't apply to all women, just the ones you're screwing. Some of them even might not want children either. Get a vasectomy, problem solved.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 12:08 AM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:40 PM
1

I don't think it's particularly worthy of top post or is very much relevant, but such are the ways of reddit. Crap memes, outrage posts, etc. often get voted to top spot. I don't know why, maybe it's because of the immediate emotional reaction.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:33 PM
1

Whatever agreement you come to, you need to get a final court order to document it. It is best to avoid lawyers as much as possible, get mediation and use a lawyer for drafting the final agreement. I think she's being pig headed and it's all about her (don't say that to her). However, it is good to be reasonable and explain your parenting plan and why she has no reason for concern. She actually needs to have some valid and tangible concern, rather than just saying that it's not good for the chil…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 01:10 AM
1

How much of that home equity went to the lawyers? Only several years of fighting, that sounds pretty bad. I hope she got stuck with costs and I don't believe that child support was decreasing in a court order.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:37 AM
2

BPD and post partum is a tough break. It's going to be a roller coaster man, you're in for a rough ride. Dealing with her, go see Dr. T and read up on it. You're going to have to talk to a lawyer to get things started, usually the initial consultation is free, but it doesn't pay to go cheap. You can expect costs to be 10K+ depending on the case. Other option, which is quite common, but not generally known by this subreddit is to self represent with the assistance of a lawyer in filling out paper…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:32 AM
2

Not sure if relevant but I enjoyed reading the review and like the blog name and user name.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:08 AM
6

The part where she says that nobody helped girls when they were doing poorly in school is complete bullshit. There's tons of special programs and scholarships just for girls in STEM.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:28 AM
4

I gave up on Hateful Mallice after she got fired from the cbc and moved to the star. She's pure clickbait and the star protects her by either closing or censuring comments. So, fuck the star, I don't read them anymore, they're not worth it. She's great advertising though, so much hate.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:26 AM
3

Any person who claims to be MGTOW or claims to understand MGTOW and doesn't understand the significance of the marriage strike and male space, is complete fool. AVFM are beyond foolish, to the point of idiocy. Paul is just being a controversial ass, MGTOW don't even give a shit about him anymore. He's only preaching to his own choir.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:22 PM
2

women actually get paid less for the same jobs than men, even to this day? You know this and state is as fact. Can you provide evidence of this assertion or is it just a belief of yours?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:10 PM
3

Tough place you're in man, but it's not insurmountable. If you think she will claim domestic violence then minimize all interaction with her and have a witness. Unfortunately, Cali is two-party consent for recording. You need to look for a place to live and get yourself back on your feet. That's a priority. My ex is abusive and she wants to argue all the time. I record her and mostly ignore her. When I served court papers on her, I had a witness and recording. She still called the cops saying sh…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:51 AM
1

He's spamming in the hopes of getting a little bit of crap data at a time and then he will put it together into one big ball of crap and call it a large sample size.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:40 AM
1

I don't think many want to do your survey because it's poorly designed and easily manipulated by trolls.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:37 AM
2

Harper, Trudeau and Mulclair. Kill, fuck or marry? Also, what do you think about the Pacetti and Anderson suspensions and the allegations released in the media yesterday?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 01:33 AM
3

The perspective on third world countries is very poor. There are some very practical reasons why tradition and culture are so strong. It's because they are so poor that they don't have any other options. Feminism doesn't provide new options, money provides options. It's not just men who enforce the traditions and culture, women are very much invested in it as well. Arranged marriages are just as good or bad for men as they are for women.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:09 AM
1

I'd like to hear this response too. I used to somewhat respect his opinion, even if I disagreed with it, but now he's just being a grade A asshole.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:03 AM
3

Well, it's not so much that feminists haven't done anything for men, it's just that they preach equality, but practice inequality. When we have tried to do things for men, feminists have actively opposed our efforts. This is bad us and bad for feminists because it makes them the enemy and creates more anti-feminists.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:01 AM
1

I can't get through the wall of text, please add paragraph breaks.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 10:23 PM
1

She said she froze, she went silent, said nothing, didn't resist and handed him a condom.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 04:24 PM
5

The anti-rape hysteria has been very high in Canada with the Jian Ghomeshi scandal going on. The Liberal party leader booted the accused from the Liberal caucus and publicly named them. It then became a big political issue.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 01:07 AM
2

We don't know any context other than she froze and sounds like she didn't do anything. It would make more sense if she said she passed out.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 01:04 AM
8

Apparently that's not what happened in this case. She said nothing and handed him a condom.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 10:24 PM
1

OMFG, words mean nothing anymore.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:40 PM
2

so any woman who's not into pegging is safe. That would explain Marcotte's concern.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:32 PM
2

It's sounds like he already lost the custody battle by allowing her to leave the state and giving her defacto custody. He needs convincing evidence to change anything.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 05:14 PM
9

Based on the wording, I think they are lumping all violent assault with all domestic violence. Meanwhile, they don't dare mention that violence against women pales in comparison to violence against men or even the number of woman on woman assault. They just want to focus on violence against women, blaming men and minimizing female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 05:13 AM
1

Here's something from a male perspective that might be more apparent to a man (literally mansplaining). Most men realize that those in power often abuse it to the detriment of others. Most men realize that they are the ones who work and die for the benefit of those in power. Most men realize that swapping out those in power doesn't change much of anything for everyone else, it's just switching masters. Most men also realize that the pursuit of power is very competitive and difficult. Most men ju…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:56 AM
5

No, not literally. Also, the media writes far more often and sympathetically about female victims. There needs to be more evidence of mental abuse and frustration to the point of snapping. I don't think it's a valid defense for many women who make this claim, since there is so much opportunity to escape. I'll await the news article about the details of the argument and murder.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:38 AM
2

I'll give you a very good example on the first point, women's violence against men is excused by society. Wether we agree or not, I'm trying to understand your line of reasoning. You appear to be claiming that gender roles are maintained by a small cabal of rich and powerful men. If that were to be true, then their wives would be the most oppressed on earth and that is not the case as rich women have always had more opportunities to break free of their gender roles. It's poor women who don't.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:20 AM
4

I don't think boys are excused for bad behavior anymore than girls, in some cases it is the opposite. Femininity is viewed as weakness simply because women can not compete with men on a physical level (exceptions and outliers of course), that's just the truth, not patriarchy. However, femininity is viewed very positively in other ways. Okay, so a few rich people who happen to be mostly male control financial and political systems, but they don't control gender roles. Even normal average people w…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:38 AM
2

I think there are both good and bad sides of traditional masculinity and femininity. I don't think that even traditionally masculinity has been viewed as all positive and femininity as all negative. What's confusing, and why I think there is a logical disconnect, is that if masculinity IS viewed a all good, then why would feminists give something they view negatively a label that they believe is viewed positively by all of society. Also, are women oppressed by society or by patriarchy? Why the w…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:12 AM
5

Maybe, I was hoping for OP's logic. One thing is for certain though, feminists take a very dim view of gender roles and they give it a masculine definition with implicit blame.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:49 AM
3

This is pretty much it. Any time with your child is a blessing.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:45 AM
7

That's they typical feminist definition of patriarchy, not even the historically accurate definition of patriarchy. You defined a word to mean something that I agree with exists, but it's something that I would normally just call gender roles. Why do you give gender roles a masculine definition when women also play a part in male-female dynamics?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:36 AM
1

It's a great idea, but that puts the onus of responsibility on the doctors, which they may or may not be willing to be involved.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:29 AM
3

He could, but that would cost a lot of money and wouldn't really change anything.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:25 AM
1

Do my children deserve this frustration too?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:24 AM
6

It's a piss poor discussion. What is your definition of patriarchy and I'll tell you if I agree or not.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:23 AM
0

I feel for you man. I've been dealing with this for almost 10 years now. The ex makes every effort to scuttle my plans, frustrate me, withhold information and make my life more difficult. After a while, you just get used to it and live with it. The courts won't/can't do anything about it.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 09:27 PM
1

I didn't say that discussing social issues aren't helpful, but they aren't a core issue because their solutions are elusive and it's mostly a distraction from discrimination issues.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:04 AM
3

I knew that wasn't the real CBC headline. Ottawa police force are among the worst in the country for being gender bigots.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:41 AM
2

Sounds like a social club about social issues and nothing to do with MRA type legal issues.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:20 AM
1

I think it's related to the femme fatale trope, or more accurately, it is the femme fatale trope. I don't know why, but they're attractive for some reason.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:21 AM
1

On using flair... after submitting your post, at the bottom it says comments share save hide give gold report flair Click it.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:17 AM
7

Just to let you in on her history. She was previously fired from CBC due to complaints about her bias and blatant man-hating. She fits right in at the star, she has a secure job there.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:55 PM
3

One of their representatives stopped by yesterday. He seems kinda stupid, almost like an SRS/AMR troll type. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2n0szi/its_pretty_hilarious_that_im_still_getting/cm9ap8l
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:14 PM
2

Jian Ghomeshi is the perfect example of a male feminist. http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/jian-ghomeshi-how-he-got-away-with-it/
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:33 AM
2

Have a downvote for being a transparently obvious troll.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:23 AM
4

Have a downvote for posting irrelevant drama and trying to get attention.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:18 AM
10

The comment you are complaining about only had one upvote, leading me to believe that it was made after the thread was active and nobody ever read it. You seem to be deliberately obtuse to the point that I suspect you are a member of the troll brigade.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:50 PM
6

Lot's of trolls are regular posters, very few are new accounts because they are too easily idenitifiable. You only reported it today, don't expect that somebody else is going to follow you around and do it for you.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:44 PM
4

The purpose of the trolling is entirely to discredit this subreddit. It happens regularly and often. They become unwelcome when they get reported. Unfortunately, they can just make a new account and keep doing it. You do understand how reddit works don't you?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:31 PM
9

The purpose of the trolling is entirely to discredit this subreddit. It happens regularly and often. They become unwelcome when they get reported. Unfortunately, they can just make a new account and keep doing it. You do understand how reddit works don't you?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:31 PM
5

Yes, trolls, lots of them, especially today.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:24 PM
7

I don't see any implied threats, but if you feel that way then maybe you should have reported it. Do you expect somebody else to report a comment for you?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:17 PM
4

The only drawback is that I don't consider it worthy to read. Maybe it is, maybe not, but you don't have any credibility.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:29 PM
4

Why did you make a new account to post this?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:04 PM
3

If you are on Tinder then that is par for the course, it is a hookup application. OKCupid isn't much better, ie. it's shit. I have a hard time considering anything on there to be sexual harassment. If you think it is, then get off those sites, you're not grown up enough. Now the explanation. It's high volume marketing and 1 out of 100 times it works. Not that I'm one of those guys but it seems to be a common complaint that I hear from women that I chat with on dating sites. I always respond that…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:39 AM
1

This is what happens when feminists demand that men stand up for them and do something about it. They get stabbed by crazy people.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 01:14 AM
3

Look over there>>>>>> at Organizations. I recommended SAVE services as they are a very professional lobbying group.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:21 AM
7

I don't think that's entirely true, war was an opportunity for women to get away from their "traditional" roles since they were needed in the factories to make up for the many lost men. Modern day feminism is more of a result of the pill and the industrial revolution that gave women more opportunities for work.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:12 AM
7

Here's my take on it. "instead" is a fallacy. Men's Rights can become a real political issue while still being laughed at and accused of being woman haters. Nothing is going to stop that with out diluting the message completely and falling in line with feminist doctrine. There are few organizations out there, there will be more. It depends entirely on the specific issues that you are interested in addressing and what comfort level of discourse you are comfortable with. This subreddit is a news a…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:09 AM
1

Maybe some information on what it's about.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:18 PM
1

I think you need a bit more information on that petition letter.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:13 PM
1

I'm not so sure the prosecution ever had a case.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:04 AM
1

Can you believe the closing paragraph? The venue for the alleged harassment, Twitter, has also faced criticism about failing to adequately deal with concerns about online abuse particularly towards women. Some background on this story by Christie Blatchford, a seasoned criminal trial reporter: But still, the exchange was an effective illustration of Mr. Murphy’s point — that Mr. Elliott’s real sin was to take issue with Ms. Guthrie’s politics. In other words, he wasn’t harassing her; he wasn’t t…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:08 AM
2

I've seen the movie, good analysis. The women are not portrayed favorably either.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:47 PM
3

There is no 'we', this is a public forum, there is no determination of who is or isn't MRA. There is no team, just individuals that take action on issues that they want to.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:27 PM
2

I notice this is your first post, complaining about other people. I don't like the label either, it's as difficult to define as feminism is, so don't self identify. Get involved with what you like and with the issues you want to see addressed. Be an example for others.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:25 PM
9

No, your sample is biased by anonymous internet trolls and I won't participate unless it is by a known and trustworthy researcher.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:46 PM
16

The $50,000 was raised from public donations and CAFE has made a lot of connections and partnerships with community and health services. Justin is a good politician, very savy. It might just save someone's life to have someone to talk to.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 03:39 AM
2

Meh, maybe the "clickbait trash" tag would be more appropriate.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:53 PM
2

Do you have links to what he has said rather than what other people are saying about him?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:32 AM
4

Musicians and actors aren't role models, don't be surprised.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:36 AM
-1

High maintenance + crazy + hot = hit n' quit No wonder she's been through so many guys.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:35 AM
2

It was different, Ignatief and Dion were lightweights. Trudeau is a relative superstar, if not only in name. Most of the conservative pundits are even not so confident, Mulroney even warned to not take him so lightly. Regardless of your confidence, the threat is real.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:31 PM
1

Not quite exactly, the NDP is already toast, their votes have moved to the liberals. Trudeau is much more popular candidate, in which attack adds don't seem to stick. Conservatives have also had a bad year and have been in power for a long time, when the public usually gets tired of the current government and wants change.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:15 PM
3

I don't think the conservatives are too happy about being so low in the polls for so long. Trudeau can't be dismissed so easilly, he can win just with empty platitudes and a flip of his hair.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:06 PM
1

Somewhat yes, but there are still a lot of young gullible idealists. Without them, the leaders like ghomeshi would be nobodies.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:36 PM
1

Fooled by the cult of personality, that wasn't really genuine altruism.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:48 PM
3

The media fuss about the billy bob interview was the first time I ever listened to ghomeshi.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:44 PM
2

It will be interesting to see the fallout from this. She publicly outed him, even without naming him. Apologizing was probably the best damage control. At least she didn't claim any lifelong trauma, but there is a high level of sexual assault hysteria in Canada right now.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:50 PM
4

I only listened to him a few times, didn't know anything about him. I'm shocked that this was happening within the feminist ranks and they were fooled by him for so long.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:30 PM
1

The irony is that he was never a submissive male, he was a leader, a manipulator and the feminist women were grovelling at his feet.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:29 PM
3

"sound like" is correct. Most people don't understand the underlying meaning, people who use the term sound pretentious and most people are uncomfortable with new words to describe their own identity. They have preferences to the words they use and are hesitant to accept new ones, especially when they are used in the context of blame.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:55 PM
5

I have a theory about the increase in media coverage for crazies. The newspaper industry is dying and it's clickbait.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:32 AM
3

No, you just need to look more closely at the history of feminism to realize that there were a lot of crazies back then too. There is more talk about petty nonsense and blatant lying but that has been happening since the 80's
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:31 AM
1

Read the linked article for background. 9 women have claimed sexual assault, 2 have made it public with their names, 3 have talked the police.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:27 AM
2

He's also Christian, born in UK and raised in Canada.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 12:50 AM
3

They hide it better because they're needy and don't have many other options.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:44 PM
3

Thanks, I will. You make great posts.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:16 PM
9

Who is oas.org and why is the complaint directed to them. I think the best option is complaining to the CBC ombudsman for journalism bias. I don't expect much to come from it, but at the very least they have to address the complaint and track it, rather than just ignore it.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:23 PM
4

Yes, they can.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:11 AM
5

There were lots of women and minority scholarships available when I went to university in ontario. I had consistently good grades and I only got a few thousand throughout university. It wasn't really based on need, there were some women I knew that were getting $3000 a term just for maintaining 80% average. Their parents were paying the rest.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:10 AM
1

Are you a troll or just stupid? Toilets are in private stalls, urinals are out in the open.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:47 PM
2

Well OP is using a throw away account and is a troll.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:25 PM
1

They are single occupancy. OP is a lying troll. Door latches are not installed on multi-use washrooms, unless the architect is a complete idiot that is.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:19 PM
2

One of the washrooms was single use washroom (M/F) for the public. The other washroom (with the keylock) was a single use washroom for staff. Apparently the staff washroom has been converted for public use.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:17 PM
1

Too late. Both doors have locks. The one with a key lock was originally a staff washroom, apparently since converted to public use.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:15 PM
2

They are also single occupance washrooms. OP is full of shit.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:34 PM
1

The one with a keylock was originally designed as a staff washroom, intended to be off limits to the general public.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:34 PM
1

Yes it is. They don't put door latches on multiple occupancy washrooms. OP is a troll.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:30 PM
1

Table is based on time studies rather than ideology. Damn good code, that's why most states have adopted it.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:11 AM
2

Late post, it was over an hour ago. How was it?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:52 AM
3

Perfect Example: Local College is removing mens-only restrooms http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2l6wzo/local_college_is_removing_mensonly_restrooms/ Analysis of the photos reveals that both are single use/private washrooms. Why? Because multi person washrooms don't have a door latch. The door latch has a lock on the inside. The washroom with a key-lock was originally a staff-only washroom. Why? Because you don't put key locks on public washrooms inside buildings. The facility was only …
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:49 AM
1

Most states have already adopted the model plumbing code. http://americanrestroom.org/code/index.htm
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:39 AM
2

The lock is because it was originally installed as a staff only washroom. The other washroom is just a single use/private washroom for public.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:35 AM
1

I don't think that's relevant anymore. Most states (as your other link to americanrestroom shows) have already adopted the uniform plumbing codes. It certainly doesn't apply in NY anymore. tl;dr-old links - old laws don't really exist anymore
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:31 AM
-2

I don't think it really matters for a single use/private washroom. The only problem with large unisex public washrooms is the urinals. Toilet stalls are private anyway.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:18 AM
1

I'm quite familiar with the building codes, thanks. You don't pay to use a toilet, nobody is obliged to provide you with food.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:54 AM
-20

The likely reason why the men's (singular/private) washroom was changed to unisex is because it was in a building that was predominantly occupied by women. This is a practical consideration and not at all favoring women, but rather eliminating line ups. tl;dr - MR got trolled and fell for it.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:42 AM
1

The difference is because men's washrooms usually have urinals of which more can fit and a fixed space and can be used more quickly than a woman on a toilet. The likely reason why the men's (singular/private) washroom was changed to unisex is because it was in a building that was predominantly occupied by women. These are practical considerations, the comparison to food is just bad. Edit: You asked for a discussion, downvoting is just bad form mate. I am a building code professional, AMA.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:37 AM
20

There's nothing left to follow. It's gone all the way to the supreme court, it's done, over.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:22 PM
2

Different number of charges. Apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:59 PM
2

tend to work in things like heavy manufacturing and whatnot that require large amounts of energy. That would not be be accounted for in somebodies personal carbon footprint. Those would be inputs into a product that somebody would buy that would be accounted in their carbon footprint.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:19 PM
3

Some of what was seen in this is clear harassment What is your definition of harassment?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:03 AM
8

My ex wife has been a deadbeat for the past 10 years now. I don't think she'll ever get another job, she's got it good living off of multiple men that she's left behind.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:58 PM
1

Edit: I read it in the Toronto Star I think you are right. Edit: Here it is http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/08/22/aboriginal_men_murdered_at_higher_rate_than_aboriginal_women.html
/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:02 PM
1

I think the current politically correct terminology is first nations. Indian is no longer in use, aboriginal is used sometimes and refers to all first nations.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:34 PM
2

I can't find the source right now, but there was a good article (a rarity) in the Globe and Mail on missing aboriginal males. There was also a segment on TVO-The Agenda that CAFE was a part of on missing aboriginal males.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:32 PM
1

I've met lots of youth with attitudes of entitlement. Nothing in particular to do with masculinity. So, you fired 3 interns out of 4 on their first day? You are the common denominator here.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:38 PM
13

Interesting turn of events since he's quite a vocal male feminist.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:00 AM
10

Not afraid, but I find that it has made me more cautious about relationships and the quality of women that I allow into my personal life.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:48 PM
2

What response did you get from AVFM when you asked for the source?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:52 PM
1

The problem with editorializing at the beginning is that it seems incredulous and leaves the reader to figure out the connections. Fear and hatred of male students exploded I assume this refers to the debate over rape culture, but that is not addressed in the following Fiamengo interview. Over 80 professors declared support for the feminists spreading fear of men I can only assume that this refers to the opposition to the lecture, MRAs, MIA or debate over rape culture. It's not supported by the …
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:54 AM
3

Your lawyer will tell you what is bullshit and what is not. Generally judges don't appreciate being presented with drama about who's the better parent. If you can't demonstrate direct harm to your child, the judge doesn't care. You're not a moron, judges and lawyers have to deal with this all the time.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:27 PM
15

It's complete bullshit. Both boys and girls have the same standards for dress codes.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:06 AM
2

This Is That is a current affairs program that doesn't just talk about the issues, it fabricates them
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:01 AM
3

Somewhat sure, but way back some time ago MRA were primarily concerned about legal issues. Now, there seems to be a lot of mission creep into trying to socially engineer equality. As much as feminism, defining MRA is elusive.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:09 AM
1

You seem really angry about a mistake between W and M. Seems to be your only involvement in this subreddit. I hope you understand how the internet works. Anyone can post comments here, stupid people are not magically excluded.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:03 AM
2

I'm surprised this was requested by a lawyer. It sounds almost like an application for parenting with an onus on the parent to prove themselves capable. because she doesn't want her daughter around his step-son. They are similar age and have never had any problems This doesn't seem to make any sense, there is no justification for such a request or details of her concerns are missing.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:34 PM
2

Hopefully Canada will do the right thing and keep prostitution legal Unlikely, it's a Conservative bill in a Conservative majority government. The only hope is that the Senate is sober, but unfortunately also majority Conservative.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:04 PM
3

Very much so, sometimes I can't tell the difference between modern feminism and victorian puritanism.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:01 PM
15

I don't like traditionalism, but don't like people pushing their ideology on others either. I prefer not to be a social engineer and let people make their own individual choices in life, as long as they recognize the risks.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:01 PM
7

http://antimisandry.com/campaigns-news/boycott-list-anti-man-companies-3611.html http://www.standyourground.com/boyc.php
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:29 PM
1

I thought this was relevant and you guys would enjoy reading. Looked at flairs, I have no clue which one to use.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 07:47 PM
1

That's just the excuse she cooked up. It's just the Mod promoting her own show.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:56 PM
2

There's some uncomfortable truth's there.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:47 PM
12

She showed no fear and organized harassment campaigns against her supposed harasser. That's very relevant to this trial.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:37 PM
3

Your comment is not helpful and only demonstrates your own lack of understanding the complexities of such a situation.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:27 PM
9

I think this is the same guy who posted a video here a few weeks back. His wife is mental, he knows the abuse is wrong and he can't/won't leave for various financial/emotional reasons. I wish you all the best man.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:24 PM
10

The reason she said that she wasn't the perfect victim was because she had orchestrated twitter harassment campaigns against Gregory and others.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:15 PM
2

I'm not religious or a believer, I don't like labels. Men/women were never "oppressed" by each other as a group. Men/women shared in each other's success and misfortune. Equality is a nice word, not sure what you mean by it. Women are great, they're awesome in offices, they're mostly absent from construction and mining or anything else that is dirty and difficult.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:30 AM
5

They are the same in some types of FGM. the choice to do it vs having it forced on you against your will would make the issue completely different That was the point I was trying to make.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:19 PM
3

I think it's awfully strange that FGM is considered mutilation, when in North America it is also called labiaplasty and is gaining popularity among adult women. I also think it's awfully strange to be prescribing surgery to infants and using sexually transmitted diseases as an excuse. Infants don't have sex, that's sick as fuck. Oh yeah, I don't consider you mutilated, disfunctional or any of that. I think you're just a whiny troll because people don't agree with you.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:01 PM
7

This is positive news to hear that judges are finally taking action against these alienating parents.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:31 PM
1

I always find that the people who make these judgements have very shitty advice about how to choose properly. Then, after all of the red flags that you have to avoid, you might as well be searching for a unicorn.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:54 PM
1

I suppose, but I don't think many people would want to live like that.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:11 PM
1

Not realistic though. Also, it doesn't stop her from quitting her job and sitting on her butt after getting married.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:58 PM
0

Okay, proceed with butthurt over what other people are discussing.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:54 PM
-3

Well, what are you recommending then? Explain why this is the "wrong type" and exactly what is the "right type"
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:51 PM
-4

...so you recommend bar sluts then?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:43 PM
2

This is just a discussion, it's not an actionable "rights issue". It's just a discussion. Calm down and back away from the computer. It's just a discussion.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:29 PM
1

Because I criticized you last time you big fucking cry baby.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:26 PM
1

I think you would still have to pay child support if you make more money. She can decided to work or not, but I don't think her short history of being unemployed is sufficient to justify alimony.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:43 PM
4

I don't know if I can say the same for her, given that she quit her full time job a year after we moved in together, and hasn't worked full time since. That's a major red flag, but I don't think it's long enough to justify alimony.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:29 PM
0

I don't think that's a valid application for alimony. It's usually only applicable to pampered wives who have become used to it over a long period of time. If she wants to work full time, you have to pay a proportion of child care costs.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:27 PM
-2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postgenderism
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:42 AM
1

Thanks, and you're welcome. There's also this, it was edgy when it first came out. There's so many references for anyone who really wants to dive into it. The first step is recognizing that simple justice department statistics don't show the real story of domestic violence and the "women's defense" excuse and talking only about the most extreme cases doesn't either. Personally, I don't like the blame game and the Whitaker study is somewhat limited in scope. I'm also not a fan of more equality in…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:18 AM
4

I didn't like the title, but it was a good video. I don't think I ever called my daughter's princess, but I still liked buying them dresses so we could dress up on occasion. But that doesn't mean that we also don't go play in the forest and gather salamanders, millipedes and crayfish. They get hurt sometimes, and they get up on their own most often, and I'll stop and clean them up and bandage then if needed. But, I never over-react and pretend they fragile. They have far more things and opportun…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:15 AM
2

Thanks, and you're welcome. There's also this, it was edgy when it first came out. There's so many references for anyone who really wants to dive into it. The first step is recognizing that simple justice department statistics don't show the real story of domestic violence and the "women's defense" excuse and talking only about the most extreme cases doesn't either. Personally, I don't like the blame game and the Whitaker study is somewhat limited in scope. I'm also not a fan of more equality in…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:58 AM
1

Lets see if I can handle 15 minutes of this. Way to insult your audience you dumb fuck, I'm almost as old as you. Still listening to this, when are you going to say something relevant to anything?... Edit: Going on 3min, still pointless... Yoko ono and pussy riot? Completely irrelevant to young girls. 4min, that's funny crazy woman, where is that from? Good news clips for the rest of the video, put that first and your commentary last next time.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:35 PM
3

Relevant article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-sacks/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746.html
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:29 PM
1

Maybe, it's been around for quite a few years.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:11 PM
12

I find it surprising that it's not embarassing for anyone to be dating an 8th grader in senior year.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:48 PM
3

Yes, it's a good site.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:31 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2c07et/domestic_violence_seeking_references_re_claim/
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:18 PM
3

It's poorly argued claptrap from a single person's point of view. Some fathers want to be fully involved with their children. Promoting the father child bond in infancy will help maintain that same bond for life.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:11 AM
2

It's all just speculation, but I would probably find it equally funny.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:47 PM
3

You get used to it after a while, some people are ignorant, but many more are very nice.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:27 PM
1

Several=2?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:47 AM
4

Good response and that bonus secret video was funny as hell.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:29 AM
2

Are you a father of children? Do you know what maternal gatekeeping is? Its' te patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:30 PM
3

improve or enhance the quality or value of. "her exposure to museums enriched her life in France" synonyms: enhance, improve, better, add to, augment; make (someone) wealthy or wealthier. "top party members had enriched themselves" Edit: actually, women have always been enriched, even without legal and economic power. some women had direct access to enrichment through marriage, many women and men didn't.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:26 PM
4

You mean like the White Ribbon campaign and the VAWA act? Sometimes I can't tell the difference between chivalrous traditionalism and feminism.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:21 PM
3

Father's rights and domestic violence specifically, which I have already explained. I wouldn't blame feminists entirely, just that they are active purveyors of "the patriarchy" as you so describe as being the problem.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:28 PM
9

Sure, feminism isn't homogenous, it's just that the most popular and largest organization are purveyors of "the patriarchy" It's a good article, written by a feminist too. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%25208-.pdf
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:32 PM
7

Sorry no, men still don't have any special authority in their own families. Women are also enriched in positions of legal, economic and moral power. Just because there are fewer women is very weak evidence of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:29 PM
1

I guess you're not aware of all the metastudies that show different then. Carry on.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:23 PM
8

Well, I'm not a big fan of the MR movement, but at the very least it has compassion for men's issues, which is much more than I can say for organized feminist groups.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:17 PM
5

That's not really evidence of patriarchy, because it in no way indicates male rule. Yes, a lot of issues do have to do with gender roles, which are traditional values very often reinforced by women and organizations like NOW. That's why I don't like the term "patriarchy", because it infers that these traditional roles are because of male rule and they are not.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:15 PM
1

Looks like a high paying job opportunity. Better than digging ditches.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:09 PM
4

Well, in a country where fathers have no authority in their own families, how can that be described as a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:08 PM
0

Any source will do, random internet search anyone?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:05 PM
8

Patriarchy is widely established as a social structure underlying much of Western civilization. I would like so see some evidence supporting that claim.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:03 PM
7

Why is NOW against shared parenting? Seems strange they are supporting the "patriarchy". Why are so many feminist academics covering up evidence of female battering? Seems strange they are supporting the "patriarchy"
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:02 PM
6

Okay, we don't have institutions of male rule or female subjugation. We don't have patrilineal inheritence. How exactly are men's problems the fault of something that no longer exists, except in people's heads?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:50 PM
-1

It's called lying by omission.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:43 PM
-2

That makes a lot of sense, irrelevant sources were provided.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:42 PM
5

What if... patriarchy v. feminism is a false dichotomy? What if...patriarchy is just a made up boogey man?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:28 PM
-1

So the claim is false.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:32 PM
3

No, when other people make claims then they have to back them up. What you have found defeats OP's claim.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:32 PM
2

It's not rampant, nor is it groundless.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:29 PM
3

I'm pretty sure J_r_s is a modsock, usually shows up to white knight for the mods.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:13 PM
2

There are only two active mods on this sub, pretty much doing whatever they want.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:12 PM
1

Cross states you will probably need some legal custody, but if your son wants it then it should be pretty easy to get for a 15 year old. Law enforcement does not enforce custody orders, they will simply tell you to go back to court. Courts regularly do very little for not complying with visitation provisions, up until the point that it becomes routine and requires a change of custody. I still think your best option is trying to talk to your son, understand what he wants and proceed with whatever…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:54 PM
1

Thing is that I have read lots of these studies, I just want the source relevant to the claim. So far, it doesn't seem to be true, or shaky at best.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:40 PM
1

It's not so much that your son is turning 18 in 3 years, it's that he can pretty much get up and leave her house any time he wants and social workers won't force him back, just put him in a group home. Even if you do go to court and get a visitation order saying you can see him and talk to him, she can still play all the same games and deny access. Your real problem is just talking to your son and finding out what he wants.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:36 PM
-6

One relevant source was linked below that says in a limited study of 1100 students that women were more physically agressive. However, for such a small study, this is cherry picking. One article in new republic quotes some numbers from different select studies that doesn't confirm OP's suggestion that gay men have less DV. It's also problematic comparing rates found in different studies without accounting for methodology.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:56 PM
3

I read the first source at the top of the list and it wasn't a demographic survey but rather a comparison of the effects/characterists of domestic violence in hetero v/ gay relationships. So, yeah, just link the one that is the source of the claims, rather than expecting me to read the whole internet.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:26 PM
0

Approximately 1/3 to 1/4 the rate of women, I don't have the source handy. Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_the_United_States
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:17 PM
-3

No it's not, nobody is providing a source.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:09 PM
7

You made the claim, back it up.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:08 PM
4

Because it's his responsibility to back up his claims. It's is not other people's responsibility to find which study and where that he is referring to. If it IS so easy to source, you could have EASILY posted a link instead of butt covering.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:08 PM
-5

I've seen sources that say different. Also, none of the same studies covered hetero v. gay, so studies are not necessarily comparable. Please provide source.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:06 PM
2

It starts getting difficult to avoid everything
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:16 PM
1

Verbal abuse is in about 15%-20% of couples Physical abuse is in about 5-10%, which includes all forms of more common physical abuse without reported injuries. Women get hurt more, but not exclusively as the domestic homicide rate is still 1/4 men. The likelihood of you not encountering it in your personal life is pretty good, but when you do it's a shocker.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:00 PM
6

There is much more that is going to be coming out about this story, but currently adjourned until november I think. According to the letter, parts of which the judge read aloud in open court, the person claimed to be a former acquaintance of the three complainants and alleges they “conspired, in my presence, to fabricate a criminal harassment complaint” against Mr. Elliott. The person also alleged the conspiracy extends “to the ministry of the attorney-general,” information relayed in the summer…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 05:08 PM
1

I have no objection to JB's opinion. I'm rather undecided and not well informed on the medical/psychological issues of transgenderism. I'm just saying that her opinion, as media director of AVFM, creators of "MHRM", seems to coincide with TERFs. However you want to spin it, she would not be interpreted as "inclusive" by the transgender community.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 04:37 PM
0

I find the whole thing confusing. Other than the intersex conditions, the symptoms for transgender appear to be psychological. Or since it's not even listed in the DSM, it is a lifestyle choice that may or may not be influenced by hormones.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 03:39 PM
-3

Is the MHRM so inclusive as you thought?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:50 PM
1

Another tactic of the TERF movement is using the widely discredited trope that being transgender is a mental health issue. Exactly the same argument made by Judgy Bitch
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:32 PM
1

You really aren't very good at this, you should go back to your echo chamber.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:54 PM
0

The only useful purpose you served is to give John and Dianna's opinion a wider audience. Everybody already knows the extent of anti-feminist trad cons posing as MRM, you're just shining more light on that. JB as a representative is another good example. Your childish hissy fits and personal attacks are more confirmation of denial.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:48 PM
1

I'm not talking about AEI claim, just that they are gynocentric trad cons. John and Dianna aren't that dumb, they just been pinching their nose at the stench trying not to let it bother them. Myself, I have nothing against them living their lives as they see fit and the WAF drama is great fodder for discussion. Just a bit of a lie posing anti-feminists as MRM, just sayin. Credit goes to the truth tellers.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:35 PM
2

I stopped listening at a little after 11:50 losing argument. They all make good points. WAF is a tradcon backlash just like a large segment of the AVFM demographic. I'm pretty sure John and Dianna knew this a long time ago, props for daring say it. WAF aren't calling themselves MRM, you are. They are primarily self-identified anti-feminists that are creating lots of drama among feminism.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:12 PM
2

Killem before they reproduce.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:36 AM
14

I thought momma grizzlies raised their cubs to be independent and self sufficient.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:28 AM
1

I've only ever heard it used on reddit, because of /r/rattit. That's where I got the use of "rattie" from.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:05 AM
3

They're the friendliest small animal I've ever had, better than any hamster, gerbil, guinea pig or bunny.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:03 AM
1

Interesting quote, he's talking about long long time ago as opposed to "civil society". He's also only speculating that it may have had a purpose, without concluding that he knows the answer. I also don't think he was comparing rape to religion but rather using it as a parallel argument that rape and religion no longer serve any purpose in civil society. I'm not particularly an athiest(more agnostic) or a fan of any of them, but I don't find it particularly outrageous to discuss such things. I'm…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 12:31 AM
-2

That there is a much better discussion than the editorialized title.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 10:33 PM
0

I don't think the video made that claim directly.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 10:20 PM
1

I know, but that was a lot of paragraphs of not really comparable history before getting to the point. Maybe I just can't imagine a memish tumblr blog becoming known as the rosa parks of anti-feminism. It's possible.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 10:15 PM
1

That's a bit much, but they did get a lot of media publicity for memeish tumblr blog. It should help open up the public discussion.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:48 PM
18

Cool. Looked at your history, your ratties are so cute.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:41 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean about throwing the baby out. Unless you mean that if I disagree with somebody on one point then I should ignore everything else they say. That's what your getting at, isn't it? You just threw in a bunch of off topic quotes from thunderfoot, dawkins and harris. That's a distraction. Sam Harris said that there are certain evolutionary advantages with rape. This is what you claimed and what I asked for the source of, not somebody else's opinion of what he said, but the ac…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:23 PM
1

I agreed with you on your point that he was deflecting, but its your responsibility to back up your claims, not mine. My lack of interest in the amazing athiest and what he said, is just that, a lack of interest. Other stuff you linked is not really relevant but merely a distraction, you have yet to back up your other claims about Harris and Dawkins. My remark on your person is simply a sarcastic response to your initial condescension. Grow up kid, it's healthy to be skeptical and demand evidenc…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:36 PM
1

Reference link on rationalwiki is dead, do you link to the source?
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:14 PM
1

You made some good points in that video, well done.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:30 PM
2

Now you are seeing that most people can't afford the tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees that it will take to become a wallet and occasional visitor to your own child. Document everything and get organized. Gather all your strength and resources, it's going to be a roller coaster. Your best option is to try to work out a parenting arrangement out of court and only go to court when all else fails.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:29 PM
1

This has to be done with the greatest of care, since there is sure to be lots of drama. Ask the police or a lawyer for assistance in this case. Whomever files first in court will be better off.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:24 PM
1

Somebody else posted it. Yes, he seemed compare it to joking, while also explaining it as rhetoric and being an asshole and apologizing again all at the same time. While I agree it's not the same as joking it's stupid internet drama from a year ago. Also, for some kid with little education and life experience you shouldn't be so condescending to a request to back up your own claims. That is your responsibility kid.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:55 PM
13

Next time suggest meeting in a public place until you know them better. "back to my place for drinks" is a common invitation to sex.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:19 PM
2

Are you autistic or something? Link to video if it's so good.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 03:29 PM
1

That's relevant to antifeminisms, doesn't really help men. Rape jokes don't either. Get rid of all the stuff that is not relevant and this sub becomes a ghost town.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 03:44 AM
5

I've seen comedians make jokes about a lot of racial stereotypes, a lot of them black themselves. I've yet to seen any that got away with making subhuman jokes.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:37 AM
1

Are you sure?
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:23 AM
1

You need to jump on board and play the victim olympics. Soldiers are traumatized by tv violence!
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:20 AM
1

I don't know if I can agree with such a generalization, I've seen a lot of offensive comedy that was funny, but rape jokes doesn't come to mind. I don't think sexual assault victims should be off limits more than any other victim. Victim Olympics are boring.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:18 AM
1

Say something funny?
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:05 AM
1

I didn't know that happened, but I'm not so sure if I believe you unless you link to the video and time. Well, considering your other claims and lack of sources.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:04 AM
2

I just want the exact source to check the context of your claims, that is all.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:00 AM
3

I agree with that. I just haven't heard too many rape jokes, but I don't consider joking about rape to be the same as a rape joke.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:54 PM
2

I'm still not so sure about that, I was hoping for more examples but I still think it depends on context. I still think it is rather distasteful to be making fun of a specific individual's misfortune in a deliberately cruel manner, but that isn't a joke or funny IMO.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:52 PM
2

Technically, just men getting raped is a men's rights issue. The sex of the perpetrator should not be our focus, that's what feminists do.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:43 PM
3

No, I agree that the mods should back the fuck off and let the community decide. I downvoted this post and 80% of the posts on this sub are low value shit posts. Yet, they apparently have entertainment value because they get discussed, raided from other subs and upvoted.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:28 PM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:22 PM
9

That would be common courtesy provided you have knowledge, but unrealistic for someone like a stand up comedian.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:21 PM
2

TJ wasn't joking, he was pissed off and he deliberately wanted to piss off the person he was conversing with. It was an asshole move, but he made his peace and apologized for his behavior. To continue raising this one asshole move as a universal example of why rape jokes are bad is just a huge distraction.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:15 PM
6

Not very, but it deals with political correctness. The upvotes have decided that it's worth discussing. You don't need to get involved or even pretend that it's important.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:55 PM
1

Video cuts off, what was the joke?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:50 PM
2

It's a strawman because there is a huge difference between making a joke and just being mean. Edit: I get it, it's just AMR being sick and sadistic fucks.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:44 PM
4

That was funny.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:43 PM
10

niagararegion.ca should be an obvious clue.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:20 PM
0

Wishing rape upon another person is not good. it wasn't funny either, unless you are some type of sick and sadistic fuck.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:07 PM
2

Context is what is most important. Telling a random rape joke is probably okay, ridiculing a victim is not.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:05 PM
2

It is not self defense, but it is a lesson that almost every boy/men learns one way or another to not going around acting like a punk and starting fights. It's not a nice way to learn this lesson (the hard way), but it is a valuable lesson nonetheless.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:03 PM
4

If this was a video of some scrawny dude acting all tough and getting taught a lesson, everyone would be laughing.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:00 PM
2

Somebody might know, but more likely to get an answer from the source.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:32 PM
2

I've seen them act like a hive mind, but if providing evidence is too much trouble then the only reasonable conclusion is that it is untrue.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:31 PM
0

Why are you asking questions about an AVFM video here? Shouldn't you be requesting confirmation there instead?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:51 PM
1

That's what she said, although it doesn't really add to her credibility. But that's not her thing, she's judgy bitch. I think she nailed a lot of points and they made nice for ganging up on the thoughtful nice feminist, who also made a number of valid points.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:34 AM
1

I don't really know either way, but JB doesn't give much evidence for a "phd", mostly rhetoric. If amr is going to get all butthurt about it then they should try to present something rather than more rhetoric to prove otherwise. Young feminist is ideallstically naive about workable criminal definitions of consent. I would love to see littlepreciouspony go on this channel with JB, that would be drama central.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:12 AM
6

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%25208-.pdf
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:52 AM
0

Tons of drama, youtube feminist v. JB. JB refers to non-binary/transgender as medically ill and call feminisms creation of gender a fucked up ideology and a bunch of assholes.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:44 AM
1

It still doesn't absolve men of the responsibility to stop complaining about how the cards are against them and man up and become men. Because you don't become a man until you assume responsibility..... It's not actually a raw deal, as a man you take deep satisfaction in taking responsibility for other people, it's the only way you get deep satisfaction.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:26 AM
1

Women in third world countries don't put much value in feminism. They have bigger concerns, like survival.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:09 PM
4

The real article is actually linked here
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:46 PM
6

I think we need to ditch sillymod and nicemod. They are promoting their own groups as stickied posts and censoring relevant posts based on their own opinions. They seem to think this is their own personal subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:59 PM
3

I've seen it go much further than that, even going so far as blaming violence on traditional masculinity, without distinguishing between types of violence. Are we going to start discussing toxic femininity too?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:24 PM
2

I wouldn't want to prejudge, but it seems awfully fishy that she just let it all happen without resisting in a crowd of people. Why would she not say something anything to anybody around sooner? Regardless of all that, he was drunk, she apparently wasn't so her testimony will have more weight. Before anyone claims he couldn't consent, he was the initiator who took off her clothes and stuck it in her. Still, what the hell is wrong with her? Can anybody explain this mindset as something other than…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:13 AM
2

Smells fishy, talk to another lawyer.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:48 AM
1

Here's a secret, one of my favorites is a feminist. He has over forty years of solid research experience in the field with an extensive list of ground breaking published works.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:58 PM
3

I don't give much credit to pseudo science, it's moreso like philosophy, but less rigorous in logic.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:54 PM
1

I haven't noticed any such trend, it may also be the news sources you choose to read or stories that you choose to notice.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:38 PM
4

sociology experts Very often, this is a contradiction in terms.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:07 PM
2

Mine are: Warren Farrell Paul Elam W.F. Price Theodore Beale Karen Straughan All important thinkers and philosophers. I don't think Farrell has ever claimed to be MRA (he now considers labels to be problematic), neither has Beale or Price. That's only two left on your list, but Elam is an MHRA and Straughan seems to like the anti-feminist label. Why not just post with your regular account?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:02 PM
3

His Doctor should be assessing his mental competency and I'm surprised that a lawyer would shrug it off so easily.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:49 PM
8

I think everyone just assumes this is obvious troll bait. Cue the sockpuppets with bad answers and upvotes.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:36 PM
1

I kinda like this response: http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2c3aww/an_unpopular_opinion/
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:17 PM
3

I get it now, you're talking married people before separation and before seeing a judge. Normally, that's not what people are talking about when they refer to shared custody. Edit: My plan was to go to my children's daycare and remove them (they can not refuse a parent without a court order) and absolutely refuse to allow their mother access until she acknowledged my parental rights to 50% This makes absolutely no sense at all and is contradictory to your claims. Also, I don't believe you that t…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:56 PM
2

Shared parenting is not the default in Canada, you must be mistaken. The rest of your story doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:33 PM
1

That's an old video and should have a more descriptive title. She's okay at pontificating, but she's not very good at discussion.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:02 AM
4

Well Tim, I would generally agree that there is a large segment of anti-feminism cloaked in men's rights within AVFM management and ranks. However, Why is NOW opposing equal shared parenting? Why are feminist academics refusing to recognize male victims of domestic violence? You pretend to be knowledgeable, answer me Tim?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:40 AM
1

A lot of people self represent in family court these days, you just need to become familiar with the process. Perhaps you can talk to some lawyers about advising you and helping fill out paperwork. 13 year olds usually have some say in custody decisions, the judge will listen to their opinions and assess them accordingly. I don't think her past issues will carry a lot of weight if they have been resolved, but the status quo of a stable home is in your favor.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:45 PM
3

I think your opinion may be more popular than you think, but it is largely unspoken.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:40 PM
4

Maybe, the media sure seems to be giving them a lot of preferential attention, because they are women. However anti-feminism /= mens rights.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:20 PM
1

From someone who knows, your comment seems very fishy.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:01 PM
4

You don't have to be a member of anything, you don't have to label yourself with people's pre-conceived biases. Just talk about ideas and share what you think is important, then you will find out who your real friends are.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:58 AM
1

Despite claims by victim advocates to the contrary, (Hamberger & Potente, 1994; Henning et al., 2003), self-defense is not the predominant motive for assaults by either gender. Reports of self-defense by women range from as low as 5% in clinic samples (Cascardi & Vivian, 1995), up to 40% among women residing in shelters (Saunders, 1986). General population surveys and studies of dating populations (Follingstad et al., 1991; Sommer, 1994) fix the rates of self-defense at only between 10% and 20%,…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:54 AM
2

Awwww cute, so naive.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:09 AM
1

Where the hell do you work that they allow an unsafe catwalk? No H&S committee? Contact the city hall building inspector.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:04 AM
2

I'm all natural and I've never really had the experience that I was different. I didn't see too many penis', I didn't make an effort to look closely and I don't remember any indepth discussions among boys about penis characteristics, circumcised, size or otherwise. There have been lots of joking around about the subject of size, but guys don't usually care about other guys specifications. I did at times feel self-conscious about exposing body parts that were supposed to remain covered. I assume …
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:44 PM
1

That's how it works, but the more important part is both of your future incomes and if she is pulling her weight or leaving you with all the financial responsibility.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:06 PM
3

It's not a scientific analysis, but it plays well anecdotally with hypergamy and many men's experiences of trying to please women's demands.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:21 PM
0

Assets are important if you are looking for a partnership rather than a one-sided relationship. Thats a part of picking the right partner.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:19 PM
2

I'm not a fan of any labels, it's a bad tactic to argue against a preconceived bias.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:43 AM
1

You're not allowed to post about being banned from r/feminism anymore. Welcome to the new r/mensrights mini-dictator ship.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:02 AM
21

Cathy Young is a feminist, that does not mean she should never be critical of feminism. She was even critical of AVFM and they got their panties in knot over it.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:59 AM
32

Look how fast a woman's opinion gets upvoted here, such misogyny.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:53 AM
1

You get banned much faster there for disagreeing with the mods. The mods here are assholes too, but they don't ban people as much.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:52 AM
10

This is very interesting. I noticed that the female victimhood propaganda campaign was ratcheting up when the war was becoming unpopular.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:35 AM
4

You've already figured out that she's possibly extorting money from you. If she really is pregnant, that is her career. That is the wrong person to have unprotected sex with, making babies is an income for her.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:21 AM
1

You should repost with that link. You made a text post instead.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:18 AM
1

Why is it a false story? Is it not true?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:14 AM
1

I didn't see any back story that it was unsolicited or sexual assault.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:10 AM
3

She already has two sons? Do you understand what's happening here?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:00 AM
5

I'm pretty sure you could find somebody who won't namecall. It doesn't sound like they're very open minded though. Laci isn't very impressive and it's unlikely that she would open up her channel to discussion of her own worldview.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:54 AM
1

No, it's not a delusion and men aren't complaining about it. The Glass ceiling isn't a delusion either. The only delusion is thinking that external forces create glass barriers when the reality is that it is caused by people's own choices. It's the natural corollary to feminist claims of the glass cellar. I believe the term was coined by Warren Farrell and it is well understood by those who understand the issues. I'm just trying to be clear that people understand that it has nothing to do with o…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:16 AM
5

Of course it's going to be taken over by feminists. They're not going to take anything you say seriously and you're just going to feel like an outsider
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:02 AM
4

What did you do to deserve such punishment?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:55 PM
5

I found all the tumblr memes to be childish and irritating but this is a very well written article.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:10 PM
-4

Well, there's been a lot of noise made and some preferential hiring of women but there hasn't been much progress/change. I'm wondering though, should women shut up about the glass ceiling and give men a chance to whine about the glass cellar or should we all just step back and let people make their own choices in life?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:43 PM
-3

Does this also correlate that men should stop whining about the glass cellar?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:17 PM
3

It's a criminal charge of harassment. The prosecutors are required to consider the evidence in the case and not go forward if there is not a likelihood of conviction.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:36 AM
1

Your xpost to /r/canada isn't appearing. Either got censored in a hurry (normal for /r/canada) or stuck in spam filter.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:22 AM
2

I'm still baffled about how this got to trial too. Perhaps they're testing the vagarity of harassment law, since all that matters is how she felt and if he should have known better. But still, they must have better things to do with their time than investigate twitter feelz.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:24 AM
13

I've been following this story in the news and I'm still wondering if there is something more that he did, but no, this is the worst thing ever.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:08 AM
0

society sees "Alpha fux beta bux" as immoral. That only applies for traditional societies, not for modern egalitarian societies.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:04 AM
0

You're moving towards the mini-dictatorship model, don't deny it.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:51 PM
3

Nothing can replace oil. The thing you are missing, is that the Hubbert curve is based on conventional oil reserves and doesn't include things like oil sands, shale oil and coal liquifaction. Still many years away from scarcity. Although, we are even further away from any form of "sustainable energy".
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:31 PM
2

Sounds like it is moreso an athiest conspiracy/controversy.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:25 PM
13

Common misconception, but no. Canada still has all sorts of women's only businesses and government programs.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:37 AM
2

Not really much of a clarification, moderator really should respond to notnotnotfred Two separate issues here, low quality shitposts and doxxing concerns. No doubt there are a lot of low quality shitposts, including almost all WBB, re:feminism, tumblr, stories, facebook, twitter, messenger posts. However, this is supposed to be a discussion forum, so just let people discuss what they want. Or, if you want to get serious, make another sub-reddit bestofmensrights, so you can pick and choose your o…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:25 PM
2

Sounds like a great idea, contact the national parents organization
/r/MensRights20/07/14 07:12 PM
2

Well, that's one perspective, but it's rather simplistic and incomplete. Having more compassion for women than men would not normally be thought of as sexism against women, but somehow that is what it is called when men are thought of as weak. There seems to be a deficit in compassion for men and a surplus for women, but it would be ridiculous to suggest solving this by treating women more like men and ignoring their problems.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:47 PM
17

High paternity fraud rates are only found in samples that are tested, meaning that there is already a suspicion. It is not representative of the population as a whole. There are other aspects of marriage and children that are fraught with risk, like divorce and whether she's vindictive and you're rich enough to pay her and your lawyers off. You could also try being very choosy and fully evaluate the person you are trusting with your future. Otherwise, being childless is a really good option, get…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:09 PM
1

Still listening but pleasantly surprised so far. Interviewer is fair and your answers are reasonable and believable.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:12 AM
1

Letter writing works better if done properly.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:43 PM
2

All of this, because such an approach does not work with those who are focused on attaining the "hyper-masculine ideal".
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:40 PM
4

You were just an outsider and were perhaps a bit too forward with uncomfortable truths. Divorce is usually the last thing on the minds of young guys, getting girls pregnant is more relevant. It's not necessary to even mention men's rights or MRA to have a conversation. It may even be detrimental as you may be arguing against preconceived notions. You have to start slow and methodically and focus on things that are of interest to your intended audience. If you want any more specific advice, post …
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:39 PM
2

Somebody has to keep the household running during all the baby mama drama.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:26 PM
4

In court they had to have a child psychologist help coax her to give answers about what my wife had been teaching her Family court doesn't work that way, but I'm not surprised that redditors are so gullible and swallowed this story whole.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:05 PM
3

She was not diagnosed, it was merely an unprofessional opinion. Anyone who knows anything about the process would know this isn't real. It's not my fault redditors are so gullible.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:04 PM
2

In Canada it's the nanny state socialist conservatives (like Barbara Kay) that are in bed with the victim feminist groups.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:24 PM
0

I don't believe this story at all, I'm pretty sure it's a troll. There is no diagnosis, period.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:07 PM
-3

Apparently undiagosed too, thanks Dr. Nick.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:52 PM
0

Sad story, sole custody decisions should only be used in extreme cases.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:09 PM
8

You should call them out whenever you find them. I've rarely seen faggot used here. Also, try to get past being offended, there is no such thing in the real world as a "safe space"
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:06 PM
2

I agree, they really are insufferable idiots, but I couldn't finish listening because the response was repetitive and not well thought out.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:17 AM
3

Slight attention is better than no attention. Do you have examples of shaming tactics? Link?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:15 AM
1

Intellegical huh? Maybe you should lower your standards.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:59 AM
6

I appreciate the sentiment, I don't think feminism is to blame for all of men's problems. However, it is important to recognize mainstream feminism's opposition to reform in family law and domestic violence.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:36 PM
2

Yes they can be discussed without blaming feminism for all of the problems (which it isn't) and also by recognizing organized mainstream feminism's (NOW) opposition to reform.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:35 PM
10

I would counter that /r/mensrights needs to learn this less and stop falling over every single special snowflake that shows up.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:56 AM
5

Most people don't get 4chan. The whole idea is to get past your emotional reactions by becoming inundated with shock and awe. Once you can get past that primitive emotional thinking, then you will be able to think clearly. Still, I don't think even men's rights gets it, special snowflakes are very popular here.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:54 AM
4

This here is the right answer. It was far too much effort to jump through all her hoops and grovel at her feet if I ever hoped to have sex with her.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:49 AM
5

The Divorce Act does >not favour any type of parenting arrangement, but rather requires >that the court adhere to the principle that a child should have as >much contact with each parent as is consistent with the child’s best >interest This isn't true. In practice, the courts favor whatever custody arrangement is demanded by the primary caregiver (ie. whomever does 51%+ of parenting). The important change in Bill C-560 is that the primary caregiver would have to argue against the presumption of …
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:25 AM
5

This is a really good example about how feminists are helping male victims of domestic violence by serving up a blame and shame sandwich.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:31 AM
0

Another sub that nobody reads.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:20 AM
0

I don't care. I scan the tag and the title for all of 2 seconds and decide if I want to read more. If I bother to read more then it's my own fault for wasting my own time.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:04 AM
1

A large proportion are low value shit posts. I don't see the difference, tag them as feminism, downvote and move on. Also, the new sub is useless because nobody will read it or use it.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:54 AM
23

My wife was like that too, she got totally pissed and accused me of cheating whenever I'd masturbate. I don't think there's anything wrong with it and other people's opinion don't matter anyway.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:27 AM
3

It shouldn't come as a surprise that someone who has been relegated to an occaisonal visitor and shat on by the mother isn't going to have as much influence.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:35 PM
2

I'd like to read about that. This is all I found on the NCFM site
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:08 PM
2

I don't know how 'we're' complicit. Okay, so we notice a societal double standard, what then? I tried looking for the opposite, this is the best I found so far
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:00 PM
6

That senator is really fucking stupid. Good laws are not arbitrary and have a distinct line that must be crossed.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:54 PM
1

I think Marvel is just trying to get free publicity by creating controversy. Likely the character will be the same. Just wait for it, the transgender Wonderwoman.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:48 PM
0

I understand you conundrum, but your opinion is not as interesting as stories.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:23 AM
0

Thanks, I actually read it now. True or not, you need stories for interest.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:15 AM
2

Add fucking paragraph breaks, it's a nightmare to read.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:46 AM
1

I see that happening with just about any type of extreme partisan. If your friends are like that then they're not very good friends and are very close minded.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:26 AM
1

No advice animals, rage comics, or other low-effort image posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion. Submit a text post and tell us your story.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:13 PM
1

Keep reading, that was only the forward to the article.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:25 PM
2

I did a search from the references I have available and Dutton criticizes Johnson far too often for me to link every source. The Gender Paradigm and the Architecture of Antiscience THE JOHNSON FALSE DICHOTOMY: INTIMATE TERRORISM VS. COMMON COUPLE VIOLENCE http://www.responsiblerecovery.org/PDF/PartnerAbuse.pdf
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:02 PM
3

Best of luck guys, this will be a test of the CAFE model vs. the AVFM model. I kind of like the CAFE model of doing regular low-cost presentations, it seems to gain them regular media attention. I don't understand the repeated use of "AVFM approved", it seems to be self-limiting and focussed towards an AVFM audience. However, it needs to be pointed out that none of the money is going to AVFM, but to KSU Men. Sage seems to be doing an awesome job in the first year of this group.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:10 PM
1

That's probably even a bigger issue with this subreddit. The mods censor dissent and direct people to a little known and little visited meta subreddit. The bigger problem is with the mods, although sillymod is one of the better ones.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:03 PM
2

All of these are addressed in the Dutton criticisms. Do you know where I can find the Graham-Kevan / Archer study mentioned above? Google only shows abstracts.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:27 PM
1

I agree, but I think this is all very trivial. People can select their own tags as they see fit. Would you be happier with a "mildy disturbing" tag rather than "outrage"?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:25 PM
2

I wasn't using wiki as a source, but that is my impression of how Johnson concentrates on the differences in intimate terrorism. I'll link you to the Dutton criticisms later when I get home if you are interested.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:22 PM
2

I don't understand what you are disagreeing with. The wiki quote seems to agree with me, is that supposed to be a quote from Johnson?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:09 PM
1

Dutton has a lot to say about Johnson and Kimmel. Intimate Terrorism is the most extreme form of domestic violence and only accounts for a very small percentage of cases, less than 5%. Johnson uses this difference in a very small percentage of cases to stereotype the majority.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:03 PM
1

Thank you for your answer. I think the success of creating public discourse was quite clear and resounding. However, I was wondering more about the criticisms of MRE and how this might have affected your long term ability to recruit and grow.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:35 PM
2

Has this resulted in any type of success for MRA edmonton, such as increased membership?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:02 PM
10

I will continue to be a feminist and an advocate for women’s rights to the best of my capacity. Hmmmmm.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:14 PM
1

Well, he's world renowned and famous alright, but not for his credibility.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 09:09 PM
1

It wasn't me.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:06 PM
1

That's quite a source you're using there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bert_Hellinger#Controversy
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:04 PM
1

I don't think slut shaming is necessary but I also laugh at this: Maybe there wouldn't be as many dry spells for men if we stopped discouraging women from sex and telling them to remain "innocent." Look, it's not just men and/or I doubt it's primarily men. Women hate sluts because they are competition.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:03 PM
1

I prefer a presumption of shared parenting first and second, giving custody to the parent who is most responsible and cooperative. Depends what the reason is for abandoning the relationship. Also, I don't see what this has to do with being a good parent.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:59 PM
8

I always find it funny when women's studies majors complain about STEM and politics, when they could have done it all by themselves. Search for "brainwash gender equality paradox" on youtube. Regardless of all the programs and social engineering, people still have their preferences.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:31 PM
0

That's right, he was mocking MRAs
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:18 PM
-1

Obvious troll is obvious. Hello AMR!
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:40 PM
2

Look at Roguta's history, they are not a regular here and quite likely just stirring shit.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:38 PM
0

I'm pretty sure it was, I just saw it yesterday. Or maybe it was from the challenge video where he was mocking MRAs. Either way, I've only seen these two videos of his, it was one of them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiVNI9nL8Dc
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:33 PM
1

That was from the debate, he was mocking MRA's. So much for quote mining without context.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:05 PM
-7

Go back to AVFM. They don't represent anyone but themselves.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:36 PM
-3

I think the correct term is special snowflakes, but you're wasting your time asking such questions. You will not get answers, only insults and runaround.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:30 PM
7

www.shrink4men.com
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:29 PM
1

Sure, but if you're depending on interpretation of stereotypes about /r/mensrights, then admitting that she is a woman would be the last thing to do.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:55 PM
1

Do a youtube search for brainwash gender equality paradox.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:51 PM
9

Paul’s clearly been around the podium a few times, but mostly in an academic setting No way, he was reading from a speech, avoided the questions and relied on ad hominen and rhetoric. Pure academic fail.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:11 AM
7

Binder was a lot less irritating. Paul did not sound like an intellectual as he claims and relied too much on rhetoric and ad hominen. He was only preaching to the choir. Borring and neither was very convincing.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:09 AM
1

Sure, but what does that have to do with your sex? Why is it important to mention your sex first in your post?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:47 AM
4

I agree with you again. Do you know why or can you speculate? I'm very curious about your opinion.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:26 AM
9

Wise words, I agree completely. However, I must call you out on identifying your sex as the very first thing in your post. Why do you think it is necessary or identify your opinion as a woman?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:20 AM
9

Anyone wondering what gender politics is like in Canada? Yes, it's nucking futty.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter