TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Traz_Onmale Archive

View 5 posts and 855 comments by Traz_Onmale on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Never have kids. "But my own kids will be different!" No.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/19 12:15 AM
1

It seems reasonable that there is little difference. Both men and women would benefit from being able to understand how things work and how to solve problems. Being smart will help you to serve your tribe in the best way possible, and to provide the best environment for your offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 08:13 PM
0

What is the real conclusion then? Why would a married, settled, post-wall woman divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 09:31 PM
2

Many if not most women prefer the untamed and adventurous types for sex. Those types are the baby daddies instead of the dads, and they generally have the most offspring (with different women). The caring type is great, but not for hot sex. A man would do best to be a bit of both.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 07:10 AM
3

It wasn't a man, or else he goes by the name of katelyn.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 10:59 PM
4

If I have to choose between a woman with a high-n or one with a lower and my goal is stability in a marriage, the choice is obvious, and causation isn't ultimately important. If there are confounding factors, and you disregard them to focus on low n-count, you'll make a poor decision though. For instance, if it's religiousity, socio-economic background, or separated parents that are the actual causes, then merely having a low n-count won't keep your marriage stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 10:10 PM
1

I read an interesting theory about the preference for Milfs in "a billion wicked lies": teens used to be the women men would aim to form a long term relationship with, as they have many fertile years ahead of them. Milfs were the ones they cheated with / had casual sex with. So for hot casual sex they go to the Milfs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 10:09 PM
2

The thread OP posted makes it clear that men settle for such girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 06:56 AM
-1

Men find it disgusting if women have sex with many partners. There's truth in that, because it can lead to STDs, to which disgust is a defence mechanism. Men often argue that it's different for themselves though, because that takes effort, they say. However, the fact that it takes effort to do something disgusting would only makes it more wrong and degenerate to still do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 06:55 AM
-1

Men who got a lot of sex also have to be very attractive and be quite hard working to do so. All a woman has to do to get laid is show up. So he works very hard to do something disgusting, while she only has to give in. Who's more degenerate here?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 06:29 AM
2

That good girls finish last.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 06:24 AM
0

But then I don't see how the article supports your point, cause it says similarly that men "could be" convicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:01 PM
22

I don’t think they’ve become unattractive, but they’ve just moved out of the ‘relationship material’ category, But definitely ‘woo girls’ This sums it up so perfectly! He'll settle for Bessy 'no woo' Beta now who'll carry his babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:55 PM
1

But the article confirms what I'm saying: "And yes, a woman could be convicted of rape in similar circumstances, though the cases are rare."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:30 PM
17

Can a woman not be prosecuted for raping a drunk man where you live? It's probably very rare but not impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 11:38 AM
1

Inequality isn't necessarily unfair. Men being physically stronger than women is inequality but not unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 06:29 PM
1

Those first 30 days are indeed an exception to parental responsibility in some states of the US, apparently, however wikipedia does say that some states also treat it as child abandonment. If the law allows for the mother to drop the kid without the father's consent, it is indeed unjust. If not, then both have the option to leave the kid at a safe haven (if both agree), both have the option to walk away and pay child support, and both have the option to find a replacement.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 05:29 PM
1

"By proxy" doesn't count as being supported by their biological parents. The support to which the kid is entitled can be either paying, caring, or finding a replacement. The fact that genders have different preferences for the way they care for their child is indeed unfortunate for the dad in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 05:00 PM
1

So you're agreeing with me that the kid is indeed entitled to support from their biological parents, either from themselves or by proxy. If either the father or the mother can find someone willing to take over their duties (either through child support or care), that's allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 04:40 PM
1

He either expects her to have an abortion, or let the kid starve, or he expects the state to deal with the consequences of him fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 09:47 AM
1

Yeah you do. He doesn't want to take care of it, so she should either have an abortion or let it starve. Unfortunately, that's not something he's entitled to. He must pay the toll.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 09:04 AM
1

If you live in the US, then yes, grandparents are liable for child support in 13 states.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 08:53 AM
1

You made it up for no reason that a man is entitled to an abortion if he makes stupid partner decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 08:33 AM
2

The biological parents are then still responsible for finding someone willing to take over. Is a father not equally able to sign his obligations away?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 07:53 AM
1

Impregnating someone accidentally doesn't entitle a man to an abortion. Once a kid exists, it is entitled to care. The people who's accident it was are more responsible for it then everybody else. So it is entitled to both its parents' care.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 07:46 AM
5

The child, once existing, is entitled to it though. Otherwise taxpayers will need to take care of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 10:43 PM
11

While I agree with your sentiment, the problem with that is that even if society is pro-choice, we need to also respect that some people cannot accept having an abortion. We really need better anticonception for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 06:26 PM
0

It does not describe how you respond to this information. I don't know about that. If you realise that all women are assholes and only out to take advantage of you, it pushes to a response.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 10:13 PM
1

it stops men from being their doormats True. and encourages a healthy codependent relationship between men and women I disagree, it's a sexual strategy that's best for men. Not necessarily for women. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 10:07 PM
9

She probably didn't expect it to be a big deal cause everyone knows and accepts that men do the same thing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/18 02:46 PM
9

Your fault for thinking that not all women are terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/18 08:42 PM
9

Couple this with Japanese extreme perfectionism and it's no wonder people rather go their own way.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 06:23 AM
2

So did she give it up for the kids or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/18 10:27 PM
1

Now I'm confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/18 06:23 AM
1

Yes! These evaluations are (most often) unconscious. In addition: If I accidentally get pregnant by this guy, will the child have good genes, or will it be a waste of a huge amount of time, risks and resources?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 06:37 AM
1

You're like a woman who wants a brutish Chad that's only sweet to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 06:28 AM
1

Baby-devoted milk factory <<>> Horny, seductive sex goddess Pick one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 03:12 PM
2

Historically, a rapist/warrior/conqueror son would have spread his mother's genes 100x more effectively than a harmless son. In other words, women who were attracted to harmless male traits had their offspring die out due to more brutal men. If these more brutal men had not raped and pillaged, there would have been no selective pressure towards female attraction to such "toxic" traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 09:34 AM
2

Female mate selection is also the result of evolution. Women find the brutish warrior types attractive because those types spread their genes everywhere by raping the other tribes. Children of such guys are more likely to be similarly successful in spreading their genes. If those men had just calmed down, the behavior and those traits wouldn't exist now. Women who found nice traits attractive had selective pressure working against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 05:24 AM
2

Wouldn't evolution select against children of mothers who are not rational, self-disciplined and striving for the best? It seems to me that these values have/had merit for women as well, just in a different form, i.e. more towards humbleness, softness, carefulness and being friendly.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 05:38 AM
1

Now, we have a state of affairs where the state has taken on the provider role, free women from the worry of not being protected and provided for, and with the freedom to chase Alpha Chad without restraint. Of course, leading to an epidemic of single mothers. I don't know man, look at how families react now when a 17 year old woman gets pregnant: it's always suddenly "the most wonderful thing" and everybody needs to help care for this baby etc. It doesn't seem to me that only the homo sapiens ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 05:53 PM
1

I guess there are women on the far end of the distribution who go for the extreme types. There are also turbo sluts who fuck anyone. If such female traits really lower their reproductive success (as seen over several generations), then these will eventually decrease. I don't see the problem with saying that men should invest more if they want to get laid. Women need to overcome more evolved mental resistance before deciding to have sex, and they generally risk more serious problems, like getting…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 07:43 PM
1

But brains cannot evolve very quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 04:12 PM
1

There is an important risk with safe guys, though. I think OP incorrectly put the emphasis on risk of bodily/emotional harm. The risk our brains evolved to care about most is that of our genes dying out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 03:54 PM
1

If they're preferring criminals they're still being selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 03:43 PM
1

You gotta admit those risks are smaller though. How else would you explain gender differences in selectiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 02:36 PM
2

i don't get it. You invest to get laid. Not because she's got a good personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 02:28 PM
29

Yep, best advice is: if you're thinking about having unprotected sex, GROW UP NOW.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 09:38 AM
1

Poverty class/welfare class/underclass women have babies because it gives them a sense of purpose. Nothing else going on. They're poor. They work dead end jobs (if they work at all). They're not college material. They're going nowhere in their lives. A baby gives them a reason to live, to keep going. A baby in their minds is someone who will love them unconditionally. A baby needs his/her mother. And being a mother means being needed. I suspect this reasoning is not limited to the lower class. V…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 10:52 PM
7

I love how one of the girls (I think the one in the corner) just keeps laughing.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 03:47 PM
14

Because male lust is a bit scary (thus, creepy) for women, while female lust is great for men cause it makes women more potentially willing. For the same reason, women need to be a bit careful wiith showing their lust, hence it's more 'liberating' when they express it among each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 08:11 PM
1

Yes, but perhaps it's because she's too ugly to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 07:22 AM
2

I find it funny that ugly women make good locks in that metaphor.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 07:09 AM
1

Actual demands, like he has to make 6 figures, know how to cook, greet me with a coffee every morning and take care of my 3 bastard children. It's no difference from demands females in other species have? "He has to sing loud" "He has to look smashing" "He has to build something beautiful for me" Even fish! Women are hard-wired to be selective like this so men shouldn't take it personally. You have a point though that women with low self-esteem will probably prop their self-image up by being dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/18 07:44 PM
1

You're mistaking a biological phenomenon, present in many animal species, for a cultural one. Women do not need to be taught how to be selective. Go outside and look at how animals behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/18 10:11 PM
2

The studies I mentioned provide scientific counter-points to the first "study" OP mentions. OPs second study is about sharing with lower ranked same-sex peers, and the results do not support his conclusion that women won't share with men... (they show that women share less with other women than men share with other men). If being more likely to share makes one more suited to be in charge of resources is another question, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 03:59 PM
11

The broader scientific literature paints a different picture when donating is anonymous: "Results indicate that women are generally more generous than men also in terms of the amounts donated. Quantile regression analysis shows that this pattern is robust if we take into account gender differences in individual characteristics such as household structure, education, and income." "when altruism is expensive, women are kinder, but when it is cheap, men are more altruistic." "In general, we found s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 09:01 AM
1

Now that birth control is getting more reliable, and men are held accountable for their offspring, wouldn't it make sense that over time we stop seeing sex as more risky to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 07:30 AM
2

Post hoc rationalisation aka: often times you merely think you know what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 07:07 AM
7

Nobody is loved intrinsically, except babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 04:07 PM
1

But wouldn't you feel flattered though?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 02:24 PM
8

If not being an entrepeneur or preferring people to ask you out makes you an object, then 99 % of men are to be treated as objects as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 01:08 PM
2

A regular man would be extremely flattered to have a female equivalent of a nice guy pining for him. That's because it says: "I want to carry and raise your child", which is far more flattering than: "I want to impregnate you." That's why male attention and friendliness will never be as flattering to a woman as it is the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/18 04:20 PM
3

Libel is illegal too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 08:28 AM
3

Like you wouldn't fuck a hot chick who treats other girls terribly.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 05:52 PM
8

-Were women always this flake prone? -Did women always have that weird sort of game where they lead on thirsty men and consider themselves to have won if the guy showed his thirst? Letting the males dance around and being extremely picky is universal, even in other animals.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 09:18 AM
13

In my experience, the ones being excessively caring are often moms. Saw some in the posted video too. I believe there was a study indicating that having children makes one more agreeable.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 09:11 AM
1

So you're holding them to the same standard.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/17 09:53 AM
2

This: The woman stands no chance in competition against a man doesn't really follow from this: because even if they excel at it, the best female lawyer will still be worse than the best male lawyer due to inherent biological differences between the sexes. because she's apparently still able to compete against 99.99 % of male lawyers. How is that no chance?
/r/TheRedPill04/11/17 09:24 AM
1

If a stupid neurotic child is a challenge to you, then that doesn't say much good about you.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/17 09:17 AM
7

For people who think like op it must feel terrible if they're ever outperformed by a woman.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 11:03 PM
3

Looks, okay, but men generally don't commit to promiscuity.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 12:46 PM
4

Because men compete for sex[1] , men must make something of themselves to win sex. Women on the other hand don't, which means that they don't have to mature beyond the emotional irresponsible teenager stage. I don't follow your reasoning. Women don't need to compete for sex, but they also don't desire sex. They desire commitment (at least, historically they did). For which they would also need to compete amongst each other.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 11:36 AM
2

In a fetish, dominating kind of way? Because otherwise I don't get it. How can sex while having a responsible, safe, boring future in the back of your mind possibly be hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 09:54 PM
1

But isn't this leveled out (in part) by the decrease in fertility? In other words, why do countries "need" immigrants to supply the work force?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 11:09 PM
1

That's not what hypergamy means though.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 04:55 PM
1

I'll tell you why you should fear hypergamy: because there is one man on earth who is the best. It isn't you. Sooner or later you won't even be the best option she knows or has. Sooner or later she's going to cheat or leave. That's not hypergamy's fault. It simply means that women are attracted to those higher in status than herself.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 07:30 AM
3

As if men once didn't care who fucked their sisters and daughters.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/17 08:24 PM
3

How can women have evolved to be hypergamous if, like you say, men controlled their hypergamy up until the current century? (Including with physical means, i.e.: killing all the men in the neighboring tribe to steal their women.)
/r/TheRedPill04/09/17 07:43 PM
3

a subservient beta male abuse I don't know what would make me want to divorce more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 07:08 PM
6

There is no inherent woman-hating in red pill theory, only an evidence-based belief that sexes are different and complementary and a field-tested understanding of their different sexual strategies. What I would find difficult to reconcile with raising and loving daughters, is the notion that women are only out to take advantage of men and are incapable of real love for their partners, like men are. Are you going to teach them differently, even though AWALT?
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 08:06 AM
2

I think you're broken, man. Do you have the thousand cunt stare as well?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 03:25 PM
7

'delusional rationalizing' I looked up some literature about it, and they use the terms "self-justification", "post-hoc rationalization", "moral hypocrisy" or "moral disengagement" ("convincing the self that ethical standards do not apply to oneself in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation." -Wiki). I tried to find whether there was indeed a difference between the genders using these keywords, but any studies ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 12:31 PM
2

I see plenty of men around me being glued to women who play games with them. RP stories are often about such guys. Men love it. Actions speak louder than words.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:23 AM
2

That does not mean the communication is 100% instrumental though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:10 AM
12

This is like saying the people who are rich in Kenya don't suffer bad problems that other Kenyans do. This seems like a good metaphor to me, because what you are saying is: "Don't move to Kenya because x number of Kenyans live in poverty so you will be poor as well." Single motherhood, similar to living in Kenya, would need to be disentangled from other factors to be able to say that it, in itself, is a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:13 PM
1

My guess is that women's attractiveness follows a bell curve while men's attractiveness does not or does less. Bell curves occur when outcomes are determined by many random and roughly equally contributing factors. A ball in the bean machine randomly goes left or right a number of times, so that the probability that it ends in the middle is higher than it ending all the way to the left or right. Similarly, the probability that a woman has some attractive features (eyes, mouth, hair, tits, manner…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 07:48 AM
1

If a person is happy being a homemaker and creating a nice environment and life for their family, then why is that shameful? I agree that shameful was too strongly phrased. I should have said: less admirable. Which it is. Long before feminism, people rightly admired those who are innovative, brave, knowledgable or artistic more than those who are not. I don't see any logic in the assumption that people are wrong to do so. If happiness is everything, then gaming and jerking your life away would b…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 12:50 PM
0

To value one thing is to devalue the opposite. The issue with this "everyone is equal" SJW bullshit is that it takes away the reason to strive for anything.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 08:09 AM
-8

It is shameful to be a simpleton who's only able to do housework tbh.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 11:30 PM
1

and this is exactly what TRP is and does, so why does it get so much flak then from women and feminists? if people have a right to fuck whoever they want to fuck it's obviously going to create losers yet we as a society still shame the losers, and of course the losers are going to react badly to this. Being angry at a situation and being angry at people for not being attracted to you are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 09:27 PM
5

Bad faith arguments should be allowed because it is often impossible to discern bad faith arguments from stupid arguments. People need to be able to make stupid arguments so that they can gain insight into themselves and the way they think. I think it's "punishment" enough for people that their terrible arguments remain visible and that people point them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 09:30 AM
3

Again, why would you even be attracted to someone who brings nothing to the table unless you were looking for someone to use? Like women, men mostly care about how their partner makes them feel. They want to feel powerful.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:21 AM
2

If having babies didn't suck, birthrates wouldn't fall through the floor in developed countries. Perhaps you're not living in one.
/r/PussyPass12/12/16 09:57 PM
3

Having children may have sucked for our parents too. Do you find that difficult to accept?
/r/PussyPass11/12/16 09:33 AM
3

Nah man, birth rates go down because having children sucks.
/r/PussyPass11/12/16 08:56 AM
2

I think there's truth in the stereotype. The thing is, you only have to be a little more neat and orderly than your partner to always be the first one to be bothered by any mess, which can quickly lead to irritation and nagging. This article states that: "Women score somewhat higher than men on some facets of Conscientiousness, such as order, dutifulness, and self-discipline (Feingold, 1994; Costa et al., 2001)." I imagine this is especially true with regard to keeping house.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 12:35 AM
1

Both sides are saying things along the lines of "how could you trust that lying piece of shit politician", "how can you ignore those blatant issues while focusing on something that is no issue at all" or "how can you be so dumb and take this blatantly wrong fake news website seriously" to each other, but I didn't know that SJWs were portrayed as holding onto one answer. I was mistaken, he was talking about postmodernists explaining all actions as being motivated from power, but he applies this: …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 06:50 PM
1

Uncertainty is too much for their anxious mind so they hold onto an answer even if it isn't necessarily true, but because they also lack self awareness they don't notice what tricks their brain is playing on them. Heh, did you also listen to Joe Rogan's podcast with Jordan Peterson? They talk about SJWs and Peterson mentions this exact same bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:58 PM
1

Are you saying that there are no negative or problematic aspects of masculinity or femininity, even when taken to the extreme?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 10:07 AM
1

Toxic femininity would be caring about others too much, and holding care as the highest value, i.e.: being an SJW.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 08:26 AM
2

Their world is determined by the success and failures of others. This is more true for men. Look at the passionate fans of any sports clubs. Look at religious fanatics. Look at gang members. Mostly men. Men love to identify with groups and that's good because it makes them better soldiers.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 01:25 PM
8

This analogy doesn't make sense. First of all, babies aren't organs... Also, how does one person taking another persons organ relate to a woman giving birth? I guess they mean it's illegal to force person A to let person B use their body, whether it's for organs or for blood or for anything else. Even if person B's life depended on it. This would also count if person B is a foetus.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:46 PM
3

There's also a theory that explains women being risk averse by the fact that in most of human history, women spent most if their adult life carrying some of their kids around or working with them nearby. Any threat they encounter would then likely be a threat to their offspring. I forgot what the theory was called.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 10:07 PM
1

Women are most likely to produce offspring if they protect themselves. But mothers can act in a very aggressive and risky way to protect their offspring even when it required little investing. A duck or a cat will attack a threat that's 10 times bigger than herself, even though they could make more offspring very quickly if they fled.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 09:45 PM
1

who got mad? "LOL" is such a classic sign of "I'm mad". "They" was women. We were talking about women who say they don't like to be property (how dare they?). You're telling me women act like they do. What women? The same ones? How can you be sure? Are you seriously regarding a group of people as a single person? Yeah I got snarky back with you. Too bad you didnt like it. Nah man, I love it. Means I get to be snarky too. you didn't point out any attempt with the " best not do that irl" did you? …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 01:18 PM
1

With I snarky comment about how "isn't it terrible that women don't want to be propeety". I snarked back. We were talking about whether it's justified if someone does not want to be property. You responded with a statement about how "they" act. Who "they"? The same people as those who say they don't want to be oppressed? How can we tell? Why bring it up if it has nothing to do with what we're talking about? At which point I brought the actual OP's post back into discussion. You again made some a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 12:51 PM
1

I didn't though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 12:40 PM
1

You are doing well following me. It's not a PPD discussion unless you have to repeat the line of argumentation a few times to avoid getting baited into 20 new discussions once people run out of material. My first comment in was in response to your statement. OP said marriage customs are a heritage of more oppressive times. One poster finds it ridiculous that women complained about such oppression. I respond that it's ridiculous to find that ridiculous. You respond that women act like they want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 09:00 AM
0

That's why so many risked their social standing by protesting against it. And still do in other countries where such laws are in place.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 08:42 AM
0

I was responding to a poster saying that women who were oppressed in the past had no right to complain. Stop pretending that I'm the one who started this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 08:37 AM
1

Because other people were property as well, women should be fine with it? What kind of argument is that? I'm not coming in here complaining. I responded to a poster who said that issues in the past were "women wanting everything to go their way".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 06:47 AM
1

You're saying certain women are acting like they want to be property. I'm saying this doesn't concern OP's statements, which were about the decline of marriage not being a bad thing. Now you're suddenly starting about other aspects of her statement that have nothing to do with wanting to be property or not. I don't think anyone can follow you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 10:12 PM
2

I can at least discuss OP, who's a real person making some statements right here. I can't really discuss your imagined "they" and the hypothetical statements "they" make.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:56 PM
2

OP doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:42 PM
3

How come you're suddenly talking about the present?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:36 PM
1

How dare women not want to be property.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:27 PM
5

For real? Oh Jesus that is dumb.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:39 PM
-9

To come up with this garbage they added up a whole bunch of men's wages and compared it to a whole bunch of women's wages and said "Wow, there's a difference". I highly doubt that such a study which doesn't control for any other factors would get any attention.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:51 PM
1

The takeaway is that you believe any bullshit as long as it makes you feel good.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/16 09:45 AM
1

Nah, we need more provoking brain fart CMVs without any sources or arguments whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/16 05:45 PM
1

So I should praise you for having a large family, either based on nationalism (which is something very recent), or even though it will fuck up my country (Netherlands), fuck up the environment I and others could enjoy, lowers people's wellbeing at the moment and lowers people's wellbeing in the future. It seems pretty short-sighted, biology-driven and selfish to me. I mean it's your good right if you long for a happy big family but how do you deserve praise? Because selfishness sometimes drives …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 07:40 PM
2

You choose to look at what's best for us on the level of nationality and at this moment in time. Not at the level of: Humanity: right now our standard of living requires people suffering to make our products, or to endure issues caused by global warming, and in the future your offspring will endure the problems we are creating now (e.g. war over resources). The whole environment: we are causing a mass extinction of species and destruction of habitats. The individual: people are being forced into…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 04:05 PM
2

society's progress and growth The world is going to shit due to large families. If everyone were to live comfortably, we require three earths now as it is. And the population is going to keep increasing exponentially unless people start taking a more critical look at reproduction choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 10:37 AM
2

The people in these cultures are wrong. There is nothing worthy of praise in having a large family.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 10:55 PM
5

Feminist culture preaches being a mother, relying on your beauty for worth and value, are less respectable and less worthy of praise than a woman pursuing a career, being independent, and most importantly, a woman being strong. Is that something specific to feminist culture? Surely those who do the most difficult, daring and impactful work deserve more praise and regard than those who do not? Or should we all be considered with equal regard without extra praise for excellence?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 09:52 PM
1

He starts with the statistics in order to explain them in such a way that men can feel better about them.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 06:10 AM
0

What kind of regard are you talking about? Being treated kindly, probably. Women are definitely not being seen as more capable than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 10:16 AM
3

The news article also states that the peak cognitive function is higher in women than in men. Does that mean that women should be paid more than men if both are working normal hours?
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 06:39 AM
2

I understand that and it's your good right to challenge people's perceptions about you. I have similar problems, although it all bothered me more when I was younger. Now I just try to deal with it and find the positive sides of it. I don't think that people are necessarily morally wrong or dumb by having general "templates" of different kinds of people around them. Without those we would not be able to easily deal with social interactions. Plus, such templates enable you to surprise them, which …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 04:33 PM
1

Yes, accept that human brains work in a certain way that will disadvantage you sometimes more than others. If human brains did not have this tendency to generalise, life would be much harder for everybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:31 AM
2

Not allowing people to make generalisations harms their abilty to understand the world and their ability to act upon this understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:25 AM
2

I don't see how that is possible. Someone who goes confidently out into the world, to continuously practice and increase their skills of dealing with the world, is simply more deserving of respect than someone who does not or cannot do this. Why? Because it takes more skill and more guts than staying at home and caring for kids. This is not to "shame" the stay at home person, I'm simply saying that displaying more skill and guts earns one more respect (and more attractiveness if one is a man).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 11:00 AM
1

Could also be that women are less attracted to men who are the types that can't hold a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:20 AM
2

Because for women it's a step up and for men it's a step down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:08 AM
3

Then lock the borders and let them deal with the consequences of overpopulation.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 05:47 PM
1

Do you really think the world's population can sustain itself much longer with its current growth rate? If we go on like we do now we'll have over 2000 billion people on earth in 500 years. The only species that will not devolve into barbarism are the ones that stop their increase in numbers beyond what is sustainable.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 05:05 PM
5

Could be they like the non-sexual attention they're getting and think he does the same. Solipsism and such.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 09:40 PM
1

You cannot look into the past but you can create testable hypotheses based on the theory that people living now are the result of natural and sexual selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 06:20 PM
1

True, it could be coincidental that, in general, sexual preferences are benefitial to the propagation of one's genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 06:13 PM
4

No, women who happened to be attracted to the Chads passed on their genes, so the trait of being attracted to Chads spreads. The trait of being attracted to betas died out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 04:54 PM
-2

Children produced by rape are more likely than others to have (their father's) shitty genes, and are more likely to have a shitty upbringing without father or resources, so I don't think being raped gives a woman an evolutionary advantage.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 07:30 AM
2

Seems like a lot of effort for a couple of free meals.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 03:09 PM
5

Parenting means forgoing one's own desires and development for someone else's. I can't think of anything more mature than that. I'm sure you, like me, know parents of whom dad is the one the kids have fun with while mom is the one who has to parent (or 'nag'). Also, I don't think many kids are able to raise other kids well.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 10:53 PM
4

Here's what I don't get: taking care of children seems to me like something that requires great maturity. No vidya games, late night drinking or impulsive spending for mom, no way.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 10:18 PM
2

Women's nervous systems have evolved to be more sensitive to threat. If this is adaptive for women, they were apparently not very sheltered for a long part of human history.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 02:38 PM
1

Contrary to popular misinterpretation, this graph does not mean that most 23 year year old women pair up with 35 year old men; it does not even mean that they are of equal SMV. Why does it say "comparative smv" then, where the lines cross? If equal line height means equal smv, then the average 35 year old man has also equal smv as the average 23 year old woman. In other words, the two lines use the same scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 10:08 PM
2

This is because men and women are both interested in things and professions that will make them attractive to the opposite sex. For women, these professions and interests will be more about looks. For men, these professions and interests will be more about money, status or safety. The things that make women attractive are just more shallow and vain.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 08:18 AM
-2

I'm wondering, in what way do you think these things would be different if promotion wasn't an issue? Would Ronda be less outspoken, acting less tough and more humble? Would she agree that she could never beat a man, even though they may want to organise a fight with one in the future? I find it hard to believe this is all a role.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 11:16 AM
0

Don't need reason. I come here to feel better about myself.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 07:59 AM
2

I looked this up for you on wikipedia. Earning potential is related to personality: Some research suggests that vocational outcomes are correlated to Big Five personality traits. Conscientiousness predicts job performance in general. In addition, research has demonstrated that Agreeableness is negatively related to salary. Those high in Agreeableness make less, on average, than those low in the same trait. Neuroticism is also negatively related to salary while Conscientiousness and Extraversion …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 08:13 AM
4

Imo this is exactly the reason people need marriage: to promise loyalty to each other despite fading attractiveness. Heh, I'm not the one starting my posts with "LOL". I'm 29.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 05:56 PM
3

I'm Dutch, we don't have land whales here. Red pillers would totally understand my comment. You can't expect a woman to let you captain her life and have nothing to offer for it. They don't focus on self-improvement for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 05:40 PM
1

Found the unemployed guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 05:25 PM
4

Unemployment is one of the best indicators of someone's character you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 04:51 PM
2

You gotta reply to the other one's message for them to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:08 AM
1

So the issue is that the group of men who have it harder than the average woman is bigger than the group of women who have it harder than the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 02:27 PM
53

Porn actresses
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/15 06:45 PM
3

Someone dying, Finn leaving, I dunno anymore. Are certain things less feminine to cry over?
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 01:28 PM
-2

We have plenty of too cool for school male characters who do everything better than others. Now that it's a female character for once, it's suddenly a sexist issue?
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 10:27 AM
5

Rey gets emotional and is crying a couple of times.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 10:23 AM
1

Define better. Better to spread? Absolutely.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 07:36 PM
-3

The problem with hypergamy is that is irrational and based on appearances, so women will not bang the guy that is ACTUALLY above them or a winner, but whoever APPEARS to be above them or a winner. That’s why women often end up with losers like rappers or “bad boys” or guys with a lot of fake confidence rather than guys that are actually successful (think, like, a humble accountant). It's not irrational if you want your genes to spread like mad. If you do, you want your sons to be successful at p…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 03:05 PM
0

You can flirt with women and still treat them with respect. Some men cannot act confidently towards women without disrespecting them. Hell, some men even need anger towards women to improve themselves. I guess fuelling that disrespect and anger is really beneficial for some.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 09:23 PM
1

The one who purchases a house or a car is more powerful than the one who picks the groceries each week.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 07:28 PM
1

We have this elderly man in our town who rollerskates around wearing nothing but a thong.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 09:45 PM
3

Committing suicide in such an event—although a valid option—contradicts our core survival instincts. Many women in history apparently have done just that, or they wouldn't have evolved the way they are now.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 09:21 AM
-1

You'd say that women, being weaker and more sexually vulnerable, did not have the luxury of letting their emotions run wild and acting on them.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 10:41 PM
1

I think we agree on the most part. I also agree that salary is not related to smv in women. Relative smv and financial independence are different reasons why she may leave or set boundaries. Still, if a man's dominance in the relationship does not depend on his ability to assert dominance physically, I'm wondering what it is based on. It used to be very simple: it was his God-given right. Later it was still based on her financial dependence. But nowadays, with financial independent women, it can…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 02:28 PM
1

I understand that women will accept a hierarchy in relationships if staying is more attractive than leaving. But this is not the argumentation that is made in the first paragraphs of the original post. If I understand correctly, it goes as follows: Men are physically able to assert control in a relationship. In accepting equality in a relationship, a man is thus handing over control to the woman. The result is that the woman is in control. I was questioning 1. by pointing out that physical contr…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 01:39 PM
1

You stated that men have the means to control their partner, and that men handwave these means when they accept equality. But if she doesn't depend on you or your money and can walk away at any time, there is no control and nothing to handwave. This puzzles me in your post.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 12:30 PM
1

How are you going to use your psysical superiority to stop her from walking away?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 08:09 AM
0

Women are much more likely to find it: "very important their partner makes/will make a lot of money" than men. Gold digging whores, not the strong independent women they claim to be. 47% vs 69% isn't that big a difference. Almost half of men apparently does give a shit about how much their partner makes.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/15 09:10 PM
1

In the dating world, Nice Guys are in abundance. They are typical manipulative creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 02:54 PM
1

Hamstering can also work very well in the corporate world, e.g. when deceiving a customer is seen as an achievement by your company and colleagues.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 02:44 PM
19

I was curious about this as well, so I did a literature search to find out if gender affects hamstering. Keywords I used instead of "hamstering" were: "self-justification", "post-hoc rationalization", "moral hypocrisy" and "moral disengagement" (= "convincing the self that ethical standards do not apply to oneself in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation." -Wiki) Studies which found an effect of gender all sugges…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 09:22 PM
1

Then women are more picky because they invest more in their offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 08:58 AM
1

I don't see any posts about studies indicating men are more violent or less agreeable though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:23 AM
1

Here's an interesting part of a lecture (University of Toronto) in which the differences in interests and other differences between men and women are clarified. Occupational preferences are talked about at around 33:00.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:16 AM
1

You're talking about the 60's and 70's while the meta-analysis is very recent. In this article (cited by 818) it's stated that indeed: Buss (1961) claimed that women are so seldom aggressive, that female aggression is not worth the trouble to study. Aggression is, accordingly to his view (at that time), a typically male phenomenon. Olweus (1978), who investigated bullying, i.e., aggressive harassment, among adolescent school children, was of the opinion that bullying occurs so rarely among femal…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 05:53 PM
2

I gave you a meta-analysis that shows that men display more physical and verbal aggression than women. It includes over 350 studies which use methods of self-report, observations, peer-reports and teacher reports and which span many countries all over the world. This meta-analysis names other, earlier done meta-analyses that are in agreement and names two theories (evolution and social role) which explain these findings. I don't think it's useful to continue this conversation if you (and those u…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 09:33 AM
1

If men are strong and empowered, they can take responsibility for their white knighting actions. Like men, children are also easy to manipulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 11:44 PM
2

Are you saying that women have to take into account that men are less able to behave responsibly in such situations?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 06:30 PM
1

If they were yelling "get him!" or "kick his ass!" I think you'd have a case against them for inciting violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 06:20 PM
1

Nobody's talking about women only committing indirect aggression.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 06:08 PM
0

Women are more prone to use indirect aggression. Men are more prone to use direct physical or verbal aggression. Here's a meta-analysis of studies indicating that this is the case. The video shows a woman throwing beer, pushing and shoving or hitting of which it is not clear whether women or men are doing it, and men threateningly walking after Roosh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 02:26 PM
-1

I saw this: Women tend to chose non-violent means of aggression over violent ones. Men are more prone to use (threat of) violence. Men tend to hold strong in-group out-group views. They are more likely to band together to fight threats by an out-group.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:18 AM
1

You build confidence when people reward your achievements, not when people reward you for wanting to have sex with you. Try raising a kid like a special snowflake and see how they fare.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 04:16 PM
1

Getting things for free is the surest way to destroy your self-confidence fast. If you haye them so much, be happy they're treated this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 12:59 PM
1

She says she doesn't want to do everything alone. Men don't have to do everything alone and are not forced to be MGTOW. It would really suck if you have to completely go your own way if all you want is some kind of career for yourself.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 06:21 PM
1

She's not asking for help, she doesn't want to be an outcast.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 11:31 PM
2

If it's culture then sensitive women can be changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 09:47 PM
1

Some people care about self-improvement and working with discipline towards goals, no matter who does it.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 01:25 PM
2

I guess many men do find her attractive. Men who secretly want to be dominated by a woman.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 01:24 PM
0

So you believe that deep down she actually respects "do nothing bitches"?
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 01:22 PM
1

What exactly do you think is fake about her? What she says here? It is to be expected that someone who's performing on her level is thinking this way about lazy bitches. Her personality? She shows in interviews that she can be spontaneously sassy and funny as well. Her performance? Her fights are interesting and show that she is skilled and intelligent. She's not saying she has no respect for women who use their sex appeal for whatever reason. She says she disrespects women do nothing more than …
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 10:41 AM
1

What are you talking about, she actually seems to be doing a lot.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 02:29 AM
1

If the average man is 30% better at the job and the skill is normally distributed in men and women, yeah then there should be many more men hired for that job than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 11:15 PM
1

With "teenager" TRP actually means those teenagers who are responsible and not easily influenced then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 09:21 PM
1

People need to feel the bad guy "got what's coming". Which is also a function of how "bad" the guy behaved. Someone who has less understanding of the consequences of his/her deeds is less to blame and thus the victim will receive less retribution. And if someone is likely to rehabilitate quicker then keeping them in jail for an equally long amount of time as adults won't help for prevention. Actually it's not. Teenagers are held criminally responsible. They get no breaks here. It's not counted a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 09:18 PM
0

Sufficient retribution is different for someone who committed a crime without fully understanding the consequences due to a lack of maturity. Prevention also works differently for someone who is more impressionable (i.e. like water): on the one hand they can be more easily rehabilitated and on the other hand they will be more easily influenced by hardened criminals when put in jail. For these reasons, being a teenager is seen as a mitigating factor in law. If women are like teenagers, being one …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 05:01 PM
0

Even if tried as an adult, their age can be seen as a mitigating factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 04:47 PM
1

There is still the possibility of putting out in the future. If one cannot have sympathy for someone if they receive, or hope to receive, something in return, then nobody in a relationship has sympathy for their partner. One could also argue that women have tremendous sympathy for their sexual partners because they are willing to risk pregnancy (and all the dangers, work and suffering that entails) for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 01:42 PM
5

"In all but four states, anyone charged with committing a criminal act before his or her seventeenth or eighteenth birthday is initially processed as a juvenile defendant." - wiki If women are evidently more likely to act irresponsibly than men, and if the law is more lenient towards those who are evidently more likely to act irresponsibly, then all a woman has to do is show the judge she has a very feminine brain to get a less harsh sentence than a man would for certain crimes. If, however, wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 01:34 PM
0

Apparently you agree with OP then that women are not as mentally incapable as TRP presumes them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 12:47 PM
2

I believe you mean sympathy, not empathy. If you cannot have sympathy unless you receive nothing in return, men can be argued to have no sympathy for women as they generally receive sex, status, offspring and household work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 12:44 PM
3

It's not an exception if women are proven to be mentally incapacitated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 12:37 PM
3

I would expect women to have evolved to care for those they are depending on and help them wherever they can. If anything happens to the one who takes care of you, you're fucked. If he's not functioning well in the group, you're fucked as well. It's in your best interest that he's at ease with you so he can recharge to face the threats outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 12:31 PM
2

But such a relationship won't involve any sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 11:56 AM
4

Juveniles and mentally challenged people get a pass on consequences on their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 11:52 AM
-2

Men score, consistently across cultures, lower than women on the agreeableness scale of personality. Since this trait is normally distributed, even a small difference between means creates a large difference when we look at the extremes. If the lowest 10% on agreeableness is in jail, they will almost all be men. Edit: And the difference between men and women in agreeableness has been reported to be as large as .48 times the standard deviation*. This means that the average man is less agreeable t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:20 PM
3

So question for the feminists .. why is masculinity bad? Do you mean for men or for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 01:48 PM
3

In the "women are wonderfull" entry in wikipedia, something interesting is mentioned: Another experiment found adults’ attitudes were measured based on their reactions to categories associated with sexual relations. It revealed that among the more sexually experienced men, the more positive their attitude was toward sex, the greater the positive implicit bias towards women. It seems also that "winners" in sex are more positive towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 09:15 AM
1

How are you so sure it's not the motivation for trp anger? People are terrible at understanding what causes them to be angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 09:00 AM
2

Send out surveys to a range of gamers of each game, controlling for playtime in the game, questioning attitudes towards women. Introducing a bias because people will rate their attitudes more positively than they are. Measuring behavior directly is far better. What you are describing can only be realised in a series of studies. A huge study taking everything into account is way too costly and risky. Based on this study however, I would bet that new studies using different methods will come to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 08:58 AM
6

Better suffer for one generation than destroy the environment for all generations to come.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 09:58 AM
2

But working in a good position is hard stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 09:55 AM
1

If the rules are arbitrary like you said, someone isn't deplorable for not keeping to them. Research shows that men are better at justifying their unethical behavior than women: Kray & Hasehunn (2012) "Across multiple contexts, men demonstrated a consistent pragmatism to their ethical reasoning. Remarkably, women's ethical reasoning was unaffected by motivational biases." Grussendorf et al. (2002)"Female respondents resist moral disengagement more than male respondents" (Moral disengagement is c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 10:03 AM
1

You don't have to give women the licence to fuck you over, but everybody else will. That's why people in general care about behaving justly: because their social group will in turn care about them when they are treated injustly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 01:50 AM
1

Isn't it the same as telling your partner his penis is smaller than your ex's?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 01:16 AM
-1

Agreeableness isn't defined like that. Such a distinction would really stand out and could very easily be shown in an experiment.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 11:23 PM
2

You'd think that women, having to invest more in their offspring, would have evolved to be less egocentric than men. It has indeed been found that women have on average more agreeable personalities than men.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 10:45 PM
1

Unless he's not the only man in the village who treats his wife okay.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 07:57 AM
-3

"Another experiment found adults’ attitudes were measured based on their reactions to categories associated with sexual relations. It revealed that among the more sexually experienced men, the more positive their attitude was toward sex, the greater the positive implicit bias towards women." This right here is quite... blue pill.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 11:15 PM
64

Although the women actually do come out on top in the Dutch 2006 season. See youtube: expeditie robinson 2006. Women gather and cook a better meal in ep2. The men sacrifice their rice for the challenge. One man leaves due to hunger in ep3. Men lose their means of making a fire in ep2. The leader says there's no structure and people only care about their own mess. Men's hut in ep2 vs women's hut in ep2 As a reward, men choose a pizza while women choose a guide who gives tips on where and how to f…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:12 AM
2

I don't think many hunter-gatherer fathers, brothers, uncles or nephews would let a rape of their relative remain unpunished.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 10:10 PM
4

That's weird, women were only able to leave the workforce a couple of hundred years ago. You'd think that millions of years of having to work their asses off in order to survive creates a selective pressure towards diligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 09:43 PM
2

This is true. However, it is that aspect of hypergamy (trading one's current partner for someone better) that's angering people. And /u/wazzup987 points out that both men and women do this when we define "better" in terms of smv instead of status (which is only male smv).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 07:24 AM
2

If women are the bottleneck of offspring, every woman is valuable to the tribe. Besides, a woman could raise her value through crafting, cooking, gathering or raising her kids well. See for example the description of a virtuous wife in Proverbs 31.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/15 09:50 PM
2

Earning your own bucks =/= marrying down.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 09:53 PM
-11

All except women who earn their own bucks.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 03:06 PM
-2

Dr Tim Hunt's said three things. The first two are equivalent to Opposite sexes usually attract each otherwhile the third one is equivalent to Women are more emotional than men. No he said women are too sexy and too emotional for the lab to function well.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 10:18 PM
12

The elephant in the room is that having and raising children sucks according to many. As soon as birth control is available, smart people opt out.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 10:11 PM
1

Because people don't want to have and raise kids. As soon as safe birth control is introduced, birth rates decrease.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 10:06 PM
1

There still is birth control.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 10:04 PM
2

Women are opting out of breeding, not men.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 10:00 PM
1

What use is money if you don't have the time to spend it?
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 08:37 PM
1

Seems like reddit is more addictive for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 09:16 AM
2

Which is where we get nonsense like enthusiastic consent laws, and law codes that automatically assign implicit blame on the male in issues of domestic assault, so he's the one getting jailed over a domestic abuse call regardless of whether he's the victim or the perpetrator. and enjoy far longer jail terms for identical crimes that women commit. Is this due to feminist beliefs or due to the belief that women are weak an incapable of committing serious crime? We got feminists claiming men hate w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 07:42 AM
2

Who says she wants to be exclusive with you.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 12:30 PM
1

Your post implied it. TRP is about seeking self-interest, but this often needs to be fired by the perception that others (women) have more, and that "they" need to be put back into their place. The expression "have it all" is mostly used with regard to working moms (google it). If this is the pinnacle of female selfishness, it doesn't seem very bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 08:00 AM
2

If a man acts selfish with a woman, she admires and respects him. If a woman acts selfish with a man, he resents her. This doesn't necessarily follow from: Why? Because men are hardwired to be protective of women, but not vice versa. She may also think he's not a good protector because he's not self-sacrificial enough. He may also think she's too self-sacrificial to keep herself and her womb safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 07:11 AM
2

It's better to base one's beliefs on science than on revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 10:25 PM
9

Nah I don't. It's just a bit of a coincidence isn't it, that both the way men and women are supposed to act are geared towards the best interests of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 09:08 PM
1

The subs make statements not only about their individual members, but about what's best for other people as well... amalt and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 08:14 PM
1

Work for whom?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 08:06 PM
8

I find it a strange concept. For men, it's in their best interest to act selfish, but for women it is to act selfless?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 07:41 PM
3

There's an abundance of research showing that age of marriage is one of the strongest predictors of divorce. It's highly unlikely that such a consensus depends on faulty research methods. Examples: "The idea that early marriage has deleterious effects is firmly ensconced in the research literature. No contradictory evidence has been reported. The relationship remains even when a number of control variables are introduced." "The age-at-marriage/marital-instability relationship, we find, can be la…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 10:15 AM
6

It's not a typically BP idea not to post here. I've had several reactions like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 08:13 AM
-3

You should watch the season of 2006 then, they did the same concept again. Very interesting.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 11:19 AM
19

They did the same thing in 2006. I've watched the first three episodes and the women actually seemed to do very well in this season. Women gather and cook a better meal in ep2. The men sacrifice their rice for the challenge. One man leaves due to hunger in ep3. Men lose their means of making a fire in ep2. The leader says there's no structure and people only care about their own mess. Men's hut in ep2 vs women's hut in ep2 Men choose a pizza while women choose a guide who gives tips on where and…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 11:18 AM
0

I've checked it and they did the same thing in 2006. I've watched the first three episodes and the women actually seemed to do very well in this season. Women gather and cook a better meal in ep2. The men sacrifice their rice for the challenge. One man leaves due to hunger in ep3. Men lose their means of making a fire in ep2. The leader says there's no structure and people only care about their own mess. Men's hut in ep2 vs women's hut in ep2 Men choose a pizza while women choose a guide who giv…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 11:16 AM
0

Don't they do that every season? If so, is this the only season it went wrong?
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 08:34 AM
6

Marriage prospered? Why was valium use so widespread in housewifes then? Also the fertility rate has almost halved since that time, decreasing the supply of workers.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 09:33 AM
5

Taking the red pill is realising that women are shitty, thus raising your self-esteem. Self improvement serves to feel better than women, thus also raising your self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 12:37 AM
1

It always used to be other men who are to blame for inaccessibility of women. Rejection by women is something recent that men seemingly need to adjust to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 12:30 AM
6

If you're talking about attractiveness for casual sex, men are definitely less attractive on average than women are. The average woman will not be very eager to risk pregnancy by having sex with the average man. For LTR this difference is likely to be smaller: women are more inclined to overlook a lack in sexual attractiveness in husbands, and men may raise their standards when considering wifes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 01:24 PM
1

Tell your GF a number of times that she's beautiful and see what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:44 PM
3

Luckily women don't seem to find as much validation in sex as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:29 PM
6

Looks like pussy isn't the only thing on a pedestal. Chad can say what he likes.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 08:54 AM
1

Except OP's husband did the whining here.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 08:40 AM
0

So you're saying a tbp reaction to trp is also justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 12:23 PM
1

So you're saying a tbp reaction to trp is also justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 12:23 PM
1

Investing, starting up a company etc. are just as mich risks as making art.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 12:01 PM
4

Women, it seems, by nature cannot handle being talked about. They cannot deal with perceived criticism. Whether they think its valid or not, whether it factually applies to them or not... the fact that it exists just irks them. Their solipsism will make it about them at the drop of a hat. They're not adult enough to leave shit well enough alone. All it just has to talk about women in some way. If you're teenage boy confessing the things you like in a girl, all the women who lack it will crucify …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 11:13 AM
4

Reactions to such articles are justified and can be found everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 05:28 PM
5

Women don't have the same incentives as men in starting up businesses (status and financial success), while doing so costs an insane amount of work. The question isn't: "Why are so few women willing to spend that much time and energy on their job?" It's: "Why is anyone willing to do so?"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 05:23 PM
18

If someone posted that men are by nature childish, incapable of rational thinking and immoral, a reaction to this would be understandable as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 05:12 PM
1

I thought that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 09:13 PM
2

I thought women aren't attracted to weakness?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 09:08 PM
3

Yet so many women sacrifice their career, social life, freedom, body and sometimes health to bear men children.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 10:43 PM
11

Potential pregnancy has historically been a huge problem for women compared to men. So while men are rating a woman based only on how much they'd like to stick their dick in her, women have an old, evolutionary voice in their head asking: "are you really willing to risk death for this man?"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 07:34 AM
1

Perhaps she's trying to express that she finds it unfair that you contribute by working a job you like while she contributes by doing household chores she doesn't like. Because the question comes up every month.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 08:48 AM
-1

The sexy exciting girl can also be unattainable. Moms are dull. This trope of the male dichotomy of attraction is older than television. Here's a good recent example. Maybe you're different but generally: AMALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 02:37 PM
-1

Moms are dull. This trope of the male dichotomy of attraction is older than television. Here's a good recent example. Maybe you're different but generally: AMALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 02:34 PM
3

We are talking about ltrs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 09:19 AM
3

They deem those women more attractive for marriage but not for sex. The exciting, wild woman with the red lipstick and cleavage is attractive for sex. That's why fathers cheat. A responsible mom isn't very exciting. It's a similar dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 09:18 AM
4

If girls are really after more than being friends with benefits, why do they postpone marriage? And I don't think there'll be much cognitive dissonance at all since equal rights is an axiom for most people.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 01:19 AM
8

In days gone by, a man entering a marriage gets at least a decade of marriage with a young attractive wife, and in return he takes care of the old hag she will become in the future. That would make a woman a whore, selling her sex like that. I thought whores were bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/15 09:27 PM
2

Postpartum is temporal. When it turns into chronic depression it follows that it is probably affected by situational factors. Unemployment with it's isolation and loss of identity/purpose/daily rhythm is strongly related to depression. Sure there are people who are very happy with this life. But my example illustrated that it is far from similar to retirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:21 PM
2

Implying a relationship with you saves her.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 09:13 AM
0

If only childcare didn't take that much effort. Why do you think so many mothers are chronically depressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 09:05 AM
1

If only childcare didn't take that much effort. Why do you think so many mothers are chronically depressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 09:04 AM
1

Gold digging is also shamed in women. Being picky isn't, but that is understandable. But getting stuck in a relationship with a loser by having a child with him is still a disaster.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 08:38 AM
3

Because staying at home sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:07 PM
1

Depends on their possessions and income.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 06:10 PM
0

RP men are a tiny minority. AMALT.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 06:09 PM
-1

It's equally superficial, maybe even more so. Are you saying that women can't be used? Maybe you are the exception and you look for more qualities, but most men don't.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 10:17 AM
-1

Then you're the exception. Everybody knows a friend who has a bitchy, dumb, hot girlfriend but who doesn't want to realise it.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 10:08 AM
1

I read the article. His theory doesn't add up to the fact that women initiate divorce so often.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 01:48 AM
-3

Are you to be held accountable then for liking young women with big tits and a firm ass?
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 04:23 PM
2

They are good at finding red pill gold. It's like a /r/redpillinaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 11:02 PM
1

The "redpiller" post could just as well have been downvoted by redpillers who don't like to hear that men perform worst in the absence of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 10:56 PM
2

Tbp is mostly good for bringing the most baffling trp posts to people's attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 10:52 PM
2

Women are on average more agreeable than men though. Perhaps women's entitlement is caused by them having to be selective and thus having higher standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 10:41 PM
2

Historically, both the male and female role can be compared to slavery. It only becomes unfair nowadays if a woman breaks free from her role while still expecting men to adhere to theirs.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 09:35 AM
1

True, which of the specific factors are the cause of the differences remains to be seen. But if I recall correctly, he goes into some of the specifics in the lecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 11:05 AM
9

In this very interesting lecture by Jordan Peterson (university of Toronto) a number of general differences in personality are mentioned: men are less agreeable women are more extrovert women are more neurotic men are generally more interested in things, women more in people (Edit: Personality differences start at about 20 minutes in.)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/15 11:46 PM
0

Although it wouldn't fit with other data about occupational and political preferences (or with expectations based on our evolutionary history), if it is true that women really are more racist, luckily men report they don't have a problem with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:48 PM
6

but apparently im a lot less prejudiced than your average female. Probably not, as studies show that men are on average more prone to racism than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:09 PM
1

WTF are y'all so BP that you believe a woman fucking you means she loves you?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 05:51 PM
18

So she pumped and dumped him.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 11:19 PM
0

Assuming that women see their notch count as a status boost because you yourself as a man see it that way is solipsistic thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 02:55 PM
-2

Why would you assume that? Women "just" have sex to boost their ego? Sex isn't a fun activity in itself? Solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 08:27 PM
0

It feels like I have to give more than I will get in return. What do you mean by this? If she has sex with you she has to overcome the innate fear of pregnancy (and with that also a chance of dieing). She's programmed to not risk that for someone unworthy.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 09:00 PM
1

Yeah but the question was whether MGTOW are good for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 11:11 PM
1

Yeah but the question was whether MGTOW are good for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 11:11 PM
8

Men have standards as well. Does that mean that they are also giving sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 10:28 AM
2

Women with low future time orientation will thus have less opportunities to reproduce. Their traits will be selected against. MGTOW is therefore good for women in the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 10:23 AM
2

Women with low future time orientation will thus have less opportunities to reproduce. Their traits will be selected against. MGTOW is therefore good for women in the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 10:23 AM
1

The amount of self-control required depends on how much you enjoy the activity. Extraverts will be actually be energized by having a conversation, even though talking requires energy.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 10:51 PM
1

Secondly, conversation takes effort just like sex takes effort. Still different from a job. Conversation and sex are supposed to be fun, unlike work. There's no point in a relationship in which either sex or talking is a chore. And most men don't want pity sex. Sex is more important for men than conversation is for women. Men will go through great lengths even for low quality pussy. If women valued connecting emotionally that much, they wouldn't initiate divorce so often.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 10:44 PM
-18

Sex shouldn't be a chore for her. And if conversation with her is a chore for you, you need to reconsider your hypogamy.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 08:38 AM
1

Looks like they will.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 12:05 PM
2

I doubt any man seeing a big-breasted round-assed woman would think to himself: "Wow, she's suitable for bearing and nourishing children."
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 01:57 PM
1

Just rephrase male shitty behavior as "thug-life" and everyone considers it's cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 01:53 PM
3

I see nothing illogical about that. E.g. a weird insecure laugh reduces his influence with others and therefore his value. His ability to game increases his potential influence and power.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 01:47 PM
2

Are Japanese women agressive? Seems like they are well aware of the wall (see other post).
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 01:24 PM
3

Why is picking the relatively best man an illogical choice?
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 12:05 PM
1

If someone disagrees for the sake of disagreeing I think you're correct. But it's not disrespectful to point out why someone is wrong about something if you care about the issue at hand. Is it so scandalous for a man to be corrected about something by a mere woman that you need to pretend to others that this never happens? You're essencially pretending to be dumb for him, which is quite condescending. Sure, in a company you need people to believe that the upper management is on the same page, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 11:16 AM
-1

It's still protecting as his status with other people is apparently damaged if you don't pretend to agree with him. Your mom's status is as well, but you don't need to be attracted to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 02:12 AM
2

I don't see disagreeing as berating, so I think they take it a step further than what is considered normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 09:19 PM
1

Support your SO in public / disagree with him only in private Doesn't that feel to you like you're protecting him, which decreases attraction for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 07:55 PM
2

Status with those holding women in low regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 06:10 PM
7

Nobody here thinks it's not shitty when women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:37 PM
1

Fields with women in them lose esteem to those who hold women in low regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 01:18 PM
2

The study talks about ethical pragmatism, meaning letting one's ethical standards be biased by one's motivations. Why do the studies seem fishy to you? I agree about the second one, but the other three studies are published in journals that are of the highest quality in the field, with 3-year impact factors of 2.70, 6.72 and 5.58. These studies themselves also seem to have had a fair impact with numbers of citations of respectively: 6, 351 and 41. One of the authors, Bandura, is a very renowned …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 11:07 AM
1

I agree that women would be more likely to hamster about a subject that they are more tempted to hamster about than men. But time and again I find the assumption on TRP that women are bigger hamsters in general because it's in their nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 09:36 AM
3

Because even knowing what could have been may inflate how see perceives her own smv. She may compare her current partner to this alpha, whether she acted on this alpha's avances or not. At least, that's how op's question would make sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 01:28 AM
2

I think he asks whether longing for past alpha sex is comparable to longing for past alpha sex that could have been.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 01:16 AM
1

I think op means women who know they can get laid with certain hotter guys but don't act on it and then choose to have a relationship with someone more on their own level. The longing may still be there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 01:12 AM
12

I was curious as well, so I once did a literature search to find out if gender indeed plays a part in hamstering. Keywords I used instead of "hamstering" were: "self-justification", "post-hoc rationalization", "moral hypocrisy" and "moral disengagement" (= "convincing the self that ethical standards do not apply to oneself in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation." -Wiki) Studies that found an effect of gender al…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 12:06 AM
2

The development of our brain depends on how our social environment interacts with us. They found out the hard way in Romanian orphanages.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 10:02 PM
2

I'm Dutch and I agree American culture is flawed in some ways. I'm not sure Russian culture is much better in terms of gluttony, greed and honour though. Russian men have a life expectancy of 64 years due to binge drinking. They also have high levels of corruption, and much cruelty e.g. in their police force and army. I understand people who are leaving.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 01:50 PM
1

I've learned that our societies will crumble due to betafication, but you're saying that beta societies are smarter and more successful.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 01:14 PM
3

RP treatment is supposed to make a woman happier.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 09:59 AM
-12

With "immoral", are you referring to American culture or to a certain sexual strategy? If they are so RP, why aren't they more wealthy then?
/r/TheRedPill24/12/14 11:53 PM
9

And yet so many women want out.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/14 11:43 PM
5

It's a shame men depend so much on validation by women...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 03:04 PM
0

Also, as the games were set in the past during times where feminism was unheard of, males were naturally masculine to a greater extent than today's culture. This brings great irony as without the feminist movement, more men today would act like REAL men, as the hamster preaches. The way to woo a woman back then was to write a poem, bring her flowers or sing her a song so... no.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 09:34 AM
2

I think awareness of what is normal may help people to get over certain body issues that would be no problem for a partner. Men can work on their career, develop confidence, social skills, read, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 09:20 AM
1

Using social resources is also an effective way to fix a problem. Women may be more inclined to use this method because historically this is where they were most powerful. That's why women also tend to be more extraverted than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 09:12 AM
17

Men tend to feel awkward about receiving support for body issues though. I don't think many men would feel comforted by "it's okay to have a small penis".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 09:28 PM
1

Simply put, the advent and rise of the internet has allowed men to "compare notes" like never before, and TRP is simply one venue for that among many others. I agree with the rest of your post, but information learned from comparing notes with people who share certain motivations and goals is bound to be very subjective. Conspiracy theorists and religious or extremist groups are all "comparing notes" via the internet nowadays and they all believe they are learning truths from this. We already ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 03:21 PM
0

We all know this friend who says he loves his GF for her personality ("no, she's really cool!") while it's obvious to everyone that she's a dumb and annoying bitch. Men aren't honest about what they are attracted to either.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 10:07 AM
10

Men are attracted to naievity and immaturity because these signal youth. But these qualities are hardly a solid base for a ltr.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 12:23 AM
1

Societies only thrived when women sacrificed their potential power in order to birth and take care of as many children as possible. Even the slightest idea that independence or power may be an option for women had to be quelled quickly because, until recently, this way of thinking posed a very real threat. You still see such old defensive mechanisms at work in some conservative areas when women choose for their career and/or don't want children.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 10:36 AM
6

Men who spent more on their previous wife than they do on their current one would be more accurate.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 10:25 AM
0

Getting laid nowadays is easier outside of a relationship and many men still choose for one. The law compensates those who earn less than their partner, male or female.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 12:17 AM
1

I overdrawed to make a point. As I wrote in another reply, how many guy friends, who validate and commit to her, do you think does a woman need to make it a fair equasion? No idea. It makes it more complicated so I think the arrangement doesn't work. Also, it's still easy and tempting for her to cheat even with the arrangement. Another point that occurs to me: if male friendship is only about a woman's SMV, really old women shouldn't be able to make male friends at all, no matter how interesting…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 11:18 PM
-4

Such an open relationship would be a fair arrangement if both parties received equal validation. But I doubt that male friendship is as validating for a woman as casual sex is for a man. Sex is validating for women also, while female friends are not as validating for men.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 09:40 PM
1

So they never thought about their behavior and why it may be bad.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 03:31 PM
1

While the differences aren't huge and there's quite some overlap, men's libido seems to be generally larger than women's. There's a good meta analysis, see this article.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/14 07:55 PM
2

I agree completely. I don't think anyone can escape such bias though. Even if you're very careful to avoid it, this probably makes you feel smarter and better. Even when you make assumptions that at first glance is bad for your self esteem (e.g. anti-nationalists, male feminists), it can still very well be a way to elevate yourself above the masses.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 01:37 PM
2

It's only rational. It's attractive though, believing that your troubles are caused by unfairness of nature and of those who reject you. And that those who reject you are actually beneath you.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 08:39 AM
2

Except if one wishes to feel superior to those who threaten their self-esteem most. Then trp tells you exactly what you want to hear.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 08:04 AM
2

Reminds me of "expiriance".
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 11:52 AM
2

Never before in nature could a species thrive with about 1.2 kids born per person. I therefore wouldn't take the social norms that worked great 1000s of years ago as a guideline for how we should best live our lives now.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 01:59 PM
1

Bit extreme. Without insurance, no women will sacrifice her career for a man's kids.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 01:37 PM
1

A post-wall mom of 3 kids, very unlikely hypergamy was the reason for the divorce.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 01:28 PM
1

Marrying someone who makes about the same as you do also helps.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 01:20 PM
1

Some would rather get a job vs having to raise kids though.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 12:46 PM
-1

I don't think it depends on intelligence. A dumber person can manipulate a smarter one if he just knows the other's weaknesses and how to use those.
/r/askTRP11/11/14 08:23 PM
0

"Strong players", those who are popular, good at the games or those who give a strong physical impression, are often voted out by the rest. See also Jan Versteegh in last season, and Edith Bosch (a very strong "manly" female judoka) who were both voted out at one point. It's about conforming to the group and to group norms. People don't like those who don't, even if they contribute to the group. See also the study in this article, or this study. If the norm is building stuff, you're gonna build …
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 05:12 PM
1

If you're not in danger of being voted out, you don't have to conform to anyone.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 04:44 PM
10

The game isn't about making yourself a comfortable place to live. It's about not drawing attention to yourself so you don't get voted off the island. Worst thing you can do as a woman is showing the other women (many of whom are models and actresses) how "manly" you are by building and fishing. You'll stand out, you're dangerous and they'll strategically vote you gone. Typically, women tend to think more in such long-term consequences for relationships than men do. If I remember correctly, it wa…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 12:03 PM
3

The church doesn't like it. I doubt many women have problems with no-sex commitment, see /r/deadbedrooms
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 12:30 AM
1

I agree that women's sex is devalued due to it being more available, but I don't see how that affects the value of a slut's sex. Even if she's a virgin, 1) you can get it somewhere else and 2) due to birth control sex isn't costly for a woman. So it's still cheap. Also commitment is less necessary and of less value as well due to increased options for women of supporting themselves.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 12:23 AM
2

Doesn't any sane person thinks that case is ourageous?
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 11:30 PM
1

So you believe such a tantrum would be idiotic?
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 11:27 PM
1

And that shitstorm would be disgusting.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 11:15 PM
4

Look at the chart in the article: the about of men wanting to be sexually dominated is about 10% lower than that of women.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 12:05 PM
2

Women want what others have. Further on you state you believe that men are the poachers. Nevertheless, the study shows none to small differences between men and women in poaching: "Because gender was not associated with mate poached status, it is not discussed further." Also: "estimates suggesting that 63% of men and 54% of women have been successfully poached for a long-term relationship". A 9% difference doesn't seem very large. I would expect it to be much larger, also considering that men ar…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 12:34 PM
-2

Unless you don't want kids.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 10:42 PM
1

This is the same as a man finding out his girlfriend is a slut, only not with him.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 05:40 PM
2

"Their smv is higher than mine, they didn't do anything for it and it makes them act arrogantly." Erh.. A five year old doesn't necessarily understand these things.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/14 09:53 AM
1

Edit: Not everything we do needs to promote reproduction. I'm just saying that if certain traits promote reproduction in a certain gender more than in the other gender, then it's likely that these traits are more present in the first. And if these traits help in achieving certain things then these things will be more easily achieved by those of the gender in which these traits are on average more present.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 05:28 PM
2

Even if women on average are less high achievers, it doesn't mean that the very best person at something at a certain time isn't a woman. It's just less likely. Why do you think I see women as empty shells? You don't have to frame life in terms of attracting mates to be influenced by your evolutionary history, which is all about mate attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 02:40 PM
2

Ah right, no not everything. But I think you can argue from evolution that a man is more likely to spend an obsessively amount of time on drumming in order to be the best. Namely, because the number of opportunities to reproduce for a man who's good at something (that earns him recognition from the crowd) is huge compared to that of a man who isn't. Meaning that men who are focused on achieving and increasing their status are more likely to pass on their genes than those who are not. For women, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 08:40 AM
1

I don't think women are the same as men, but I do think that it is generally life's losers who focus intensely on the accomplishments/superiority of whatever 'group' they belong to. That's typically a man's thing to do. There are studies on this, but simply look at sports team fandom in men compared to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 07:31 AM
1

I hold the belief that women are different than men and that men and women can't ever be equal. If I need something done I will typically ask man of I'm going to ask anyone regardless of what advice is needed. Also advice on how to deal with people? Children? Cooking? Decoration?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 07:26 AM
1

Evolution caused differences between the averages of men and women in some traits. Any task that benefits from e.g. dominance, risk-seeking, low anxiety or interest in things instead of people, a man is more likely to be better at than a woman. In other words: a woman who is very good at such tasks is more rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 07:12 AM
1

"Doing it slightly worse" in your post should then be: "being less likely to be as good at something as a man is".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 10:42 PM
2

If one group is, on average, slightly worse at something than another group doesn't mean that individual members of this group are all slightly worse at this thing than individual members of the other group.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 10:37 PM
-4

I never knew women were evil for being slutty in the first place. Or are you angry that they aren't slutty with you?
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 07:54 PM
-2

So marriage would suck for women as they won't be able to keep up with their husband's libido.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 08:56 PM
1

If it's only about controlling their destiny, how does their focus on the perceived inferiority of women fits in?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 09:20 AM
1

How are those things for the recognition of other women?
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 09:11 AM
1

Exactly, with 100+ years ago I mean the whole of human history minus the last 100 years.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 09:08 AM
1

Communities were much smaller in almost all of human history. And people (especially women) depended on their communities.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 10:13 PM
1

Im talking about cheating with a beta, not on a beta.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 10:11 PM
1

Why would women want recognition by other women? They have nothing to offer.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:59 PM
1

Escaping bad feelings caused by disapproval can be done either by negating those feelings or by gaining approval.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/14 06:50 PM
1

I disagree. If the main point is to win approval of women, why so much focus on women's inferiority? I would argue that the main point of trp is to avoid/escape from feeling bad about women's disapproval.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/14 03:21 PM
3

Or it's because tribal warfare for millions of years was mostly about killing the men and taking their women.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:51 PM
2

Absolutely, that's why men are more bothered by the idea of women cheating than the other way around.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:49 PM
1

I doubt many alphas would be willing to start a ltr with an unreliable woman, and I doubt many women would be willing to cheat with a beta.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:46 PM
1

I'm saying it was far more risky. So it seems really unlikely that it was very prevalent.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:44 PM
2

Men a woman cheats with are not dependable at all. Being known as a slut would have been devastating for a woman 100+ years ago.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:30 AM
4

It seems to me that these women adopt the same sex =/= love attitude as men have.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:17 AM
-6

A true man will argue that his cheating does't mean he doesn't love his wife because "it was just sex". The only difference is that men are more hurt and less accepting when their SO cheats because they have evolved that way.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:15 AM
-6

Yet without the presence of men there is no reinforcement of attention-getting behavior.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:09 AM
-4

For the most of human history, women have been depending on their men. You'd say that creates a selection pressure towards being loyal.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:02 AM
5

Except when she makes more money than he does.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 12:13 AM
1

True, but men would have to be very happy, like extremely happy, to account for the decreased happiness of women in these countries.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 07:25 AM
0

What do you think is more important: few sex partners or not having done degrading stuff?
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 07:07 AM
1

Allright, I'm sure having children is very fullfilling for many people. And I also respect people who sacrifice their lifes in order ro raise their kids well. But I'm willing to bet a conversation with Ivan Ukhov is more interesting than one with a mother about diaper changing or about the new words her kids learned.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 04:08 PM
-2

If children are awesome simply because they are your children then there's nothing really awesome about them. This is a mistake in thinking parents often make. They post pictures of their kids all over facebook because their kid is so special and everyone should marvel at it. Meanwhile nobody cares about another kid.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:34 PM
1

I understand what you're saying but I wouldn't blame feminism for this line of thinking. Life experience, wisdom, knowledge and contributing to the development of humanity are good qualities regardless of gender, and you're not going to get them being uneducated and sitting at home. Gaining such accomplishments in order to gain status or to attract mates would devalue them in my opinion. Intrinsic motivation is much more valuable. For instance, people like Newton or Tesla are awesome because the…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:29 PM
-2

Having only dumb children to socialize with, no goals, no achievements, no pride and little activity.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 06:15 AM
-2

In both cases there is little activity, no socializing with colleagues, no goal to work towards, no sense of accomplishment, no income, no pride.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 06:11 AM
-1

No social contacts, not much activity to keep yourself busy, no challenge, no goal, no sense of accomplishment.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 06:07 AM
-2

Unemployment actually causes depression, also in welfare states.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:58 PM
1

I don't understand how countries with the most gender equality are happiest.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:43 PM
3

Women who don't want to settle down and be mothers are also called immature and selfish even.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 06:55 AM
-1

Except nobody wants to marry a post wall divorced woman.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 06:53 AM
2

Except nobody wants to marry a post wall divorced woman.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 06:51 AM
4

Yet they are attracted to men who accomplish something.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 10:46 PM
2

He's using the term hamster incorrectly. He means she'll be more attracted to a divorced man because it proves desirability and willingness to commit.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 10:45 PM
9

Women don't like marriage, they are the ones who most often divorce their men.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 10:38 PM
-4

Are you saying that a man's value depends on a woman's lack of value?
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 08:47 PM
3

Perhaps it's called the hardest because it's the most boring.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 08:43 PM
3

There is more variance in men, but if only a small subset of men produced offspring you'd expect less variance. If women were more likely to reproduce than men you'd expect more variance in women. This higher variance in men must be caused by something else then. Perhaps men who deviated from the men's mean had more chances of reproducing compared average men than women deviating from the women's mean did compared to average women. A smart man has an advantage over an average man, a smart woman …
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 12:42 PM
0

If only the top men reproduce, you'd expect less variance, not more.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 07:23 AM
14

As a man, one gets real admiration for one's accomplishments, real attention and real friendship. A woman will always suspect that it's due to her pussy, which is not really a compliment for her. Also, I'd rather have my strength be admired and my weakness be despised than the other way around.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 07:17 AM
1

Being admired for strength.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 07:04 AM
0

Who would be comfortable with, as you said, being average, mediocre and unremarkable.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 07:01 AM
9

Scrubbing a house all day would really suck.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 09:22 PM
1

Are you talking about redpillers or others?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 10:24 PM
2

It detracts from the amorality of the discussion. Persuasion through emotion, repetition, strong wording or catch phrases are characteristics of advertising, not of amoral discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 09:44 AM
2

Aren't men necessary for hunting or defending the village? And even if men are expendable, why would men care more about other men than women do? Seems to me that a man is more valuable to a woman than to another man.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 09:58 PM
1

Well I agree. Women depend more on their social standing for their survival.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 07:35 AM
1

What about the influence of gang culture on men? Or frat culture? Or cut-trhroat business culture? Promiscuity or divorces don't really compare.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 11:31 PM
1

He's not insane, he's jealous. Men tend to be jealous because they're evolved that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/14 10:38 PM
3

Men are actually on average way more disagreeable than women. Just search for "gender differences" "disagreeableness".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/14 10:10 PM
1

I would argue that society makes a lot of those fucked up enviroment possible by arguing shit like : "single mothers are heroes" I would too. It's bullshit, if they where men, nobody would give a shit. Put a asterix in front for having a vagina and they are role models. Men who go against social norms in order to do good are celebrated as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/14 01:53 PM
1

Beneficial to most. Natural human behavior is cooperarion. Just look at how fucked up children get if they're not raised in a safe and stable environment. And it's not factual information about those heroines?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 09:52 PM
1

i agree, so lets stop catering to women I agree lets trow the patriarchal/gynocentric rule book in the fire and let's fight, fuck and kill ourselves to our hearths content. That's not beneficial or natural human behavior. Fact: the most important figures trough history where men. Feeling appropriate facts: girls did stuff to. I don't remember being taught any of such feeling appropriate facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 12:14 PM
1

Maybe men have traits that are just not suited for modern society. To what extent should society change in order to tend to men's needs, and do we even have the means to change it? Hard concepts have been replaced by easier texts because it wasn't fair to girls that facts were more important than feelings. Lolwat
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 11:54 AM
0

Being a good wife and mother hardly requires any intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 11:41 AM
-1

It's not sloppy, you can't investigate everything at once. They are planning to examine these findings further by including more factors, like who's the breadwinner: "We also plan to examine the potential mechanisms outlined in the background section as potential pathways that link illness with subsequent divorce, widowhood, and mortality. Care-giving, for example, is more commonly enacted by women across the life course (England 2005). Compared to instances in which husbands must care for ill w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 11:23 AM
1

I'm talking about the expression of negative problematic behaviors. Boys are more prone to direct those towards others, girls are more prone to direct those to themselves. Some emotional or behavioral disorders manifest themselves outwardly. Externalizing behaviors constitute an acting-out style that could be described as aggressive, impulsive, coercive, and noncompliant. Other disorders are more accurately described as "inward." Internalizing behaviors are typical of an inhibited style that cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 10:45 AM
0

Don't worry, I said it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 10:24 PM
1

They are competitive if they get into the range of the man's own skills. It's not just reactions, people express their opinions about housewifes, which are understandably quite low. It creates a conflict, however, because they desire the naive, young housewife type of woman and detest her at the same time. It's funny because this conflict is very comparable to that of women who desire and detest the strong oppressive alpha type man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 10:22 PM
1

If she had she'd be too competitive so you can't win with these guys. The phrase I mentioned was just meant as keywords to find all kind of low opinions men have about housewifes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 09:21 PM
1

Because they are said to have no skills or conversation. Proof? Search "hardest job in the world" on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 09:03 PM
2

Your SO =/= women in general. Men will look down on you even more if you're a housewife.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 08:13 PM
-2

Yes because you can be a housewife with 0 skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 08:12 PM
3

Even a lower paid job earns one more status than being a housewife.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 03:29 PM
7

So women are sacrificing their career, their status, their ability to be the captain of their own lifes... Doesn't seem like an awesome deal as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 09:47 AM
5

This is true. A woman will not feel this obligation so she's more likely to feel that she's letting traditional values 'oppress' her if she stays.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 09:41 AM
10

I thought boys being more expressive than girls is part of the reason why they do bad in school. And that women being more prone to internalise issues is part of the reason why they are more often depressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 09:25 AM
2

Her: because I thought that I had some.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 09:05 AM
2

She was involving you in her decision-making by calling you while she was making the preperations for dinner. She mistakenly thought that things wouldn't turn awkward. Now she has learned not to trust you like that anymore. I'm not sure if it's good for your ltr if you can't lightheartedly communicate with each other.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 09:04 AM
1

Women on average internalise issues while men on average tend to express frustration. This gender difference is well known in psychotherapy. This is also part of the reason why boys have more problems in school.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 07:53 AM
-3

So you've realised they are as useless and worthless as yourself?
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 04:35 PM
2

If women weren't attractive, men would have no reason to envy and hate them. Differences between the sexes would also not exist as they are the result of sexual attraction of our ancesters.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 07:24 AM
1

Married off to an alcoholic husband who abuses her and her son. Forced to separate and fuck old men for cash. Cheating husband. No education. Resorts to prostitution to provide a future for her kids. Getting pregnant for cash. Wow, women have terrible lives where you're from.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 06:02 PM
1

It's not a matter of feelings: if being disloyal is evil, then being inherently disloyal (due to evolution) would make a woman inherently evil. Is this conclusion a war on women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 03:32 PM
2

In order to not be hamstering, would she have to admit that she finds his slightly dickish behavior actually attractive?
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 09:51 AM
2

Maybe men are indeed inherently somewhat evil. Isn't that what TRP claims about women as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 08:32 AM
2

How is that hamstering though?
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 11:38 PM
0

Women have a moderate sexual market value just by virtue of having a pussy. Men do not have ANY default value by having a dick, and so they must artificially create value in the form of status, money, looks, humor, excitingness etc. If a man could fuck a woman in a cardboard box, he wouldn't buy a house. And no man has ever gotten pussy just because he has a dick. If, like you said earlier, a woman's smv lies in her value to provide sex, and a man's lies in his value to provide commitment, then …
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 10:00 AM
2

If K likes to provide for nothing in return he's the male equivalent of a slut. TRP always has great advice on how to deal with sluts: sexual strategy is amoral, use people for what they're good for etc. Why is it different when the genders are reversed?
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 07:19 PM
1

how you have to prove yourself, and how women don't have to and they destroy the culture. You're saying that women do such work due to intrinsic and men due to extrinsic motivation?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 12:29 PM
3

He makes some blue pill statements though: 3:30 "only men want rough sex" 4:35 "men are the biggest cheats going after the tingles"
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 07:20 PM
1

If women were having so much sex with all these other men, why was the purpose of these laws then to increase offspring?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 10:13 AM
1

It makes more sense to me that women do the wild and degrading stuff with guys they never see again. Part of the reason why I'm not into LTRs.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 10:07 PM
3

OP said that being pervy ("loved a rough degrading fuck") is part of what makes a woman undesirable to him as a LTR. It doesn't make sense then that he wants his LTR to do that shit with him.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 11:47 AM
0

Somehow the picture of a loving mother doesn't fit with hardcore sex.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 09:21 AM
1

Would you want to do degrading shit with your LTR... and then keep having the LTR?
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 07:56 AM
2

I agree, it's not to ruin the relationship. But there's this idea that when a woman cheats it's worse for the relationship than when a man cheats, because men are better able to keep sex and affection separated. Since I agree with that, I'm somewhat surprised that the article suggests that women are better able at keeping their affairs a secret (for a long time as well).
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 09:15 PM
2

The article says women cheat less than men and tend to keep it secret more. I thought women cheated more and do it to ruin the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 06:03 PM
5

Why do they lie about it more if they don't value the relationship?
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 05:58 PM
1

There shouldnt be if there is more selection pressure on men. Men should be more adapted than women.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 09:56 PM
3

I can't wait for genetics to be based on the parents' wishes instead of on their sexual desires towards each other. This will change the average state of women, however, more than that of men. Think about it: everybody will want an ambitious, athletic and intelligent child. Nobody will wants a kid that grows up to be a dumb and insecure bimbo. Women have always selected their partners on such criteria, men have not. Also, TRP strategies being obselete would be great.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 06:38 PM
1

It's strange then that there's higher variance in intelligence in men than there is in women.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 06:07 PM
3

What exactly do you mean you have to do when you say you have to lick these women's dirty cunts or they call the police on you?
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 09:30 AM
1

It incentivized women to work though.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 09:11 PM
0

Not really. Plenty of unassertive men who have done fine in history, and plenty more who would have done just fine being unassertive had they not found themselves on the wrong end of a gender role. Either way, unless you're some kind of molecular biologist and have some pretty serious evidence to prove that women are genetically predisposed to seek out assertive men, none of this is actually relevant. Men are generally less agreeable than women, across cultures, even across species. These person…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 10:26 PM
0

Yes it is. For most of history, women have generally depended on their partners to secure a save spot for them and their offspring. Meaning that men who where not assertive and aggressive enough to do this have always been unsuitable mates. Only in the last 50 years has this changed in some places in the world. This is definitely not a cultural preference: you can even administer hormones and make such preferences change, and they change during a woman's period. I hold such women just as respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 08:47 PM
1

Why don't you place any blame or responsibility on the 'dark triad'? I was responding to the discussion that started with: "Why don't you place any blame or responsibility on the 'dark triad'?" I was saying that ignoring somebody's mistakes is better than making these mistakes. I didn't say she is not to blame. Having sex with a man who you might suspect will abandon you with your child is not as bad as having sex with a woman and abandoning her with your child. None of those things make him "un…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 08:03 PM
-2

Misjudging someones bad character is not as big a flaw as having the bad character. Also, the responsible beta often has other traits that make him an unsuitable partner: less assertiveness, less status, less power, etc. This is why these preferences evolved in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 10:06 AM
1

I don't rule out the possibility of bibleverses being contradictory because I don't rule out that possibility in any book I read. If the bible first states that a wise woman faithfully instructs, and later that this instruction is only meant for younger women, then I don't hold her wisdom in very high regard.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:43 PM
1

I agree with you about her husband. Do you also believe it extends to any other man who isn't a servant or a boy?
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 12:40 PM
1

It seems strange that the Proverbs woman, so knowledgeable in the ways of business, would only have advice for younger women.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 09:39 AM
1

In the Proverbs text, the role of a perfect woman isn't only being a mother, it talks a lot about doing business as well.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 09:35 AM
1

If the "instruction" was only meant for children and other women, why didn't the Proverbs text say so? Instead, the text paints a picture of a woman who is knowledgeable in the ways of trade, production and agriculture, so it seems unlikely that her advice only concerns how to submit to one's husband.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 09:33 AM
1

Seems like Paul didn't want too much competition.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:16 PM
1

11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. That's funny because the proverbs text said: 26 She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:24 PM
1

Your answer fits perfectly with her statement. Having multiple previous partners gives her more people to compare you to and would therefore be more intimidating than having a single previous partner.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 11:08 AM
0

Rewording an argument in an analogy does not make it more valid or invalid. It only makes it seem more valid because dumb people are going to conclude that the argument is valid just because the analogy is valid.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 10:58 AM
-3

You are not strengthening your argument by presenting it with different words (in an analogy).
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 10:54 AM
1

But it is what you implied in your first post when you said being rational is the highest value. That is a form of rationalism. I do think that being rational when discussing empirical statements like those posed by TRP is superior to being irrational, but that doesn't mean I think all questions can be solved in this way. To be specific, the first post was made in a discussion about the statement that pop culture doesn't teach men about RP dating strategies. This statement can be approached rati…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/14 01:00 PM
1

There's also the idea that "psychology studies are shit" or "the scientific community is infiltrated and run by evil feminists" that's popping up often in trp, which would make it impossible to approach RP theory in an empirical way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/14 11:45 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism This view was pretty much destroyed by Kant, if you're really curious. No one has really come up with a good argument against the whole of Kant A rational person isn't necessarily a rationalistic person. When you enter a discussion with someone and you agree upon certain assumptions, or, say, that certain scientific proof will be convincing enough for winning the argument, rationalism is not necessary but rational arguments are. Is that really not the cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/14 03:11 PM
1

Do you talk to many philosophers? Don't presume others view things the same as you. I would estimate that about 80% of debates online occur because of poor communication. In any case, formal logic does not happen here. People tend to use formal logic willynilly when it suits them. I know them but it doesn't matter because any discussion will usually sort differences in assumptions out if there are any, so it has never been a problem. I mean your arbitrary standard of rationality. How do you mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/14 10:33 AM
1

Okay, I may agree or disagree, but first I need you to explain whether you mean formal or informal logic and debate. No, not everything should be considered part of a formal debate. On here, I would agree that maybe we should, but since /r/PurplePillDebate/[1] is open to all users, we can't maintain quality control. The logic used in these discussions is both formal and informal. It doesn't mean there can be no discussion since both parties usually share certain assumptions, for instance about w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/14 09:45 PM
2

Feelings are useful for other things, but it's impossible to have a discussion without the use of logic. Sure you can have ideas about what's true based on your feelings or religion, but you're going to have a hard time transferring those ideas to someone more rational. For instance, when someone claims that "women are x", instead of giving examples and thus appealing to feelings, I'd rather do a quick google scholar search for "gender differences x". There is simply no other valid way to test s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/14 10:02 AM
1

His logic is flawed. Assuming that more violence is worse than less violence, he concludes that violent rape is worse than mild rape. The problem is that what makes rape bad or worse involves more factors than violence. For example, non-violent rape by a familiar or caretaker can be more damaging and traumatic than violent rape by a stranger. He confuses a general rule with a logical truth.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 10:27 AM
9

The post. I'm saying that openly disregarding logic is the closest thing to admitting being wrong that I've seen a trper do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 10:22 AM
11

I've once been told that "you're attempting to suggest a completely social issue can and should be solved via pure logic, which is not reasonable in the least." That's close, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 01:11 AM
1

Richard Dawkins is wrong because he uses flawed logic. Assuming that more violence is worse than less violence he concludes that violent rape is worse than mild rape. The problem is that what makes rape bad or worse involves violence but also other things. For example, non-violent rape by a familiar or caretaker can be more damaging and traumatic than violent rape by a stranger. He confuses a general rule with a logical truth.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 05:21 PM
4

Isn't that a compliment to him? It's raising his smv.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 05:04 PM
12

Too bad he says to himself: "Ariel, it's your fault for fucking wanting to hang out with young girls."
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 05:01 PM
3

Because duty sex without desire is worthless and would only lower his self-esteem.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 01:10 PM
-1

If you agree with me that Richard Dawkins was logically wrong it's puzzling why you would respond to me instead of to OP.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 01:03 PM
4

I explained that you are using language games and how this leads to nonsense when applying the law.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:26 AM
-4

Logic doesn't allow for exceptions. He didn't say "is generally worse".
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:24 AM
2

Problem is that Richard's statement leaves room for varying these other factors.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:09 AM
5

Violent crimes are defined as those offenses which involve force or threat of force. Interpreting all crime in which something is violated as violent makes no sense.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:08 AM
1

Mixed race people are often very attractive. Perhaps that's what causing some to do porn as well.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:09 AM
-7

They had a point though by argueing that mild rape can be worse than violent rape if other circumstances differ (e.g. familiar perpetrator).
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 07:53 AM
-7

They had a point though by argueing that mild rape can be worse than violent rape if other circumstances differ (e.g. familiar perpetrator).
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 07:52 AM
0

There's a stickied post about tone policing you might want to check out.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 06:11 PM
1

That's why it would be very weak to use this as argument.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 08:56 PM
-16

"Feminists, your argument is invalid because some random bitches were trolling short men on twitter."
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 05:33 PM
0

Are you in such a shitty university that professors hamster and give bad grades to those who disagree?
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 05:13 PM
1

Were you manipulated yourself then?
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 05:09 PM
2

Women have tits and subcutaneous fat to drag with them though.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 02:11 PM
1

People don't need to be indoctrinated to desire status, independence, success, achievement, etc. Women really don't like it when men point out how little women have achieved in terms of science, art or politics. This alone would be motivating enough for me.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 11:19 AM
2

This way she'll see kinky sex as a favor she does you, and not as something she desires.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:27 AM
-2

The modern woman simply will not have sex for any other reason than tingles Hold on, for what reasons would you have sex?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 07:55 PM
1

Marriage is just not for women anymore. They can make their own money. Why would they want to have regular sex with someone they're not that attracted to anymore. They love the wedding and the social status, not marriage itself.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 07:49 PM
7

Fortunately, power in numbers ended in around the middle ages.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 11:46 PM
-5

Perhaps with "hardest" they actually mean "shittiest".
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 11:46 PM
-7

How can you not have an emotionele stake in it? Seriously. It validates you in doing what you love to do. It makes you a strong, sympathy-deserving, silently suffering Marty Stu type. It makes you feel superior to those who's judgement you care about. It gives you reasons to believe the world ought to work in the way you would like it to work. Of course you have an emotional stake in what you believe to be true. People always do. You can tell because people with worldviews making them truly unha…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 11:03 PM
0

Being an asshole isn't the same as solipsism. Understanding other peoples' feelings does not mean one has to care about those feelings.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 07:10 PM
1

Studies show there's a difference. Men and women aren't the same.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 08:57 AM
2

I take it she agreed with you.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 04:06 PM
4

Women have on average a stronger sense of disgust.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 03:08 PM
3

A bigger pension? Or money in exchange for bearing him children? Looking for approval of society before doing something seems better than just doing it.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 11:49 AM
-17

She's in university so why would she need a provider? Also most people wouldnt ask advice about what to do in this situation, they would just cheat.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 09:32 AM
3

Can you provide an example where TRP posts show that women shouldn't lift weights, read more, pursue new hobbies, continually educate yourself, get a better job/start your own business, etc. This happens more in comments in my experience, but I found some good examples: Just now there was an article on the front page about why women shouldn't be confident. The argument here isn't just that confident women are less attractive to men: the author wants women to be unconfident. Confident women are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 05:10 PM
2

Someone posted what they believe to be the 2 goals of TRP, and I definitely agree: Better yourself as a Man, e.g. lift weights, read more, pursue new hobbies, continually educate yourself, get a better job/start your own business, etc. It does this by taking these values and defining them as purely masculine, vilifying women who desire power, status or independence (evil feminists). You can see this in how TRP posts fall into one or both of the folllowing categories: 1) Why men can and should pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 09:40 AM
1

I think people find it misogynistic that TRP applies values like you mention (confidence, independence, strength or high standards) to men only. See the article that's on top of the front page right now. This leads to either of the following problems: If these are universally good values, for all human beings, women are somehow excluded from humanity. If these are purely masculine values, women who genuinely have these values themselves are seen as unruly and presumptuous.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 05:25 PM
1

True, but this would predict that men and women are now evenly non-monogamous because there is no need for long term pair bonding for both.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 01:09 PM
1

What would you advice a man to do if following his dream makes him less attractive to women?
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 08:23 AM
0

But when it's illogical that such an impulse would exist, I question those who claim that it does.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 07:56 AM
0

Sure, there are advantages of cheating, but these are not nearly as big for women as they are for men. Men: more offspring, vs. women: chance of better offspring or chance of a son who has chance of more offspring (which also implies that sexy men tend to sleep around). It's not logical that typically women instead of men would seek sexual attention. It's more logical that either the author is projecting, that he was overly jealous (which is an adaptive trait for men) or that his stories are som…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 07:53 AM
2

Can you explain how these videos changed your view of women?
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 01:07 AM
-2

I have one problem with this: biologically it makes no sense that sexual attention means the same to women as it does to men. What good is it to her if a man is sexually attracted to her if he's not willing to commit? Slightly better offspring at the risk of your committed man leaving you? Not a good deal. It all seems like projection to me.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 01:05 AM
1

It's not like I broke down in tears or stayed in bed all day. I muttered two or three lines about "things might not get better" and it hit the wrong nerve. You had a fight, didn't you?
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 07:49 AM
-1

You seem bothered by women improving themselves for themselves, or preferring to stay single.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:52 PM
5

If you need a woman to choose either marrying you or civil war you might not have much to offer.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:34 PM
-2

Meh, good luck making a name for yourself if you're not allowed into universities or are far less likely to inherit a titel of nobility.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 01:29 AM
7

I'd say it's mature to leave your partner if he/she chooses to go away for months. It's immature to cheat behind their backs.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 08:12 PM
-1

However, a 40 year old man can get on a car or a motorbike and travel the entire freakin' world alone and safely, go through rainforests, parachute, scubadive, climb mountains, cross desserts. All alone and safely. Doing those things alone is generally not safe, except parachute jumping. I don't think many women are that adventurous that they want to hike through jungles or deserts alone. I also think many women will not desire to visit cultures that are unfriendly to them. Also, women in genera…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 10:31 PM
2

Why are they not in control if they want to do those things? Sure they have to be more careful when going to less safe places but otherwise they can do what they want. If they are less adventurous then they won't miss it either.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 04:03 PM
4

Having a decade more to get laid (while they got laid a decade before you did and don't care as much about getting laid) isn't that much of a victory.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 03:03 PM
-1

A wake up call doesn't change biology. Nature doesn't care about happiness.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 01:49 PM
3

Women live with a mental condition in which they never remember themselves being wrong or at fault. No matter what. They believe their own bullshit so strongly that they actually become offended and feel accused/persecuted when you tell them they did something wrong... even if it's factually correct. No, women actually have on average lower self esteem than men.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 06:05 PM
1

It's paradoxical though because leaving the child would make her a more attractive future mother.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 12:03 AM
-1

Or marriage and children just aren't much fun. See top post of today.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 01:12 AM
0

/r/childfree
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 12:47 AM
1

No I'm hoping that guys in that sub will also hold women in their surrounding accountable for immoral behavior. I don't like it when irresponsible women give other women a bad reputation so any shaming of these women is fine by me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 05:52 PM
-1

I'm hoping that the mindset transfers to real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 08:03 AM
0

It helps to improve women by holding them accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 11:27 PM
1

Then you judged at start, which is easy if girls are wearing revealing clothes.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 07:46 AM
-4

Men do probe in hope of finding no belly fat, just like women are shittesting in hope of finding no weakness.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 10:55 PM
-2

Men want to undress women so yes.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 10:51 PM
2

Except that I handily demonstrated how that was untrue. You said it's unlikely that characters in highly fictionalized world will influence peoples dating behavior. I showed evidence that it is likely. You said this is not applicable. Then you came with anecdotal evidence about yourself and appealed to emotions. If people's behavior is not influenced by fictional characters then companies really waste huge amounts of money to get their products used by certain fictional characters. You were the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 10:41 AM
1

None of that means television significantly influences all people. Did you even see the correlation values? If people are not influenced by what television characters say and do, there wouldn't be so much money spent on product placement. The other trope was better because that one was about a character not being dominant while also being successful in romance. I agree that there exist examples of this (see also Wash in Firefly, perhaps characters in rom-coms) but they are far more rare than dom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 09:54 AM
1

Those studies find an interaction with anger traits meaning that television still has an effect. Media influence people, that's why for instance reading good thought-provoking books is good for you. Same with movies or tv series. A character doesn't have to be in similar circumstances or capabilities to be relatable and influential. You don't have to be as powerful as a movie character to adopt an attitude that is a little more like theirs. Or at least to not adopt an attitude that is opposite t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 10:31 AM
2

Let me help you, the argument went like this: Dominant men getting the ladies is a popular trope in mainstream media (see examples). This idea in the media may not have influenced you, although it's likely to have an effect (see sources). Even though it had no effect on you, since RP ideas are present, it's illogical to blame mainstream media for you being blue pill. There is no need to bring sympathy or any other emotions into a logical argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/14 04:59 PM
2

I think the problem with your argument is you're conflating about 100 (/s) different social theories and assuming they're all the same thing. No they're explaining the same findings. TheRedPill exists because media and women teach men women hate dominance. It's the Don Draper paradox; if you ask a woman if she likes him, she'll so "no, he's a womanizing asshole". If you ask her "but, would you suck his dick?", she'll say "obviously, I'd love too; he's a womanizing asshole". Whether or not media …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 11:47 PM
2

Research suggests that media has an effect on sexual attitudes. It's widely accepted that media influences people's attitudes, through agenda setting, cultivation or social cognitive learning. And even though media may not have given you the idea that girls are attracted to dominance, my list of examples shows that this idea has been quite popular and accepted, so at least they tried.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 12:05 PM
2

Research suggests there's an effect on sexual attitudes as well. It's widely accepted that media influences people's attitudes, for example through agenda setting, cultivation or social cognitive learning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 12:03 PM
3

Yes, these findings are reproducible: a meta-analysis covering 217 experimental and field studies (longitudinal and cross-sectional) found a significant association between viewing violence on tv and antisocial behavior.* The influence of media on aggression is just one example of media influence, research suggests there's an effect on sexual attitudes as well. It's widely accepted that media influences people's attitudes, through agenda setting, cultivation or social cognitive learning. And eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 12:01 PM
4

Role models do not have to be real to be influential. Second, many scholars have recognized that the process of identification can extend beyond the viewing situation. After describing responses to characters while viewing, Rosengren et al. (1976) noted that “equally or even more important are those relationships which extend beyond the moment of viewing.…Most important, perhaps, is identification regarded as a more durable phenomenon— ‘long-term identification’ with one or more of the personae …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 12:37 PM
2

Yet paradoxically these shows are most often aimed at women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 11:47 AM
1

Children and adolescents take on the behavior of their fictional role models, even though these role-models differ from them in power or status that is related to the behavior. For instance, watching violent TV or game characters was shown to increase aggression in the short and in the long term, even though these fictional characters are obviously way more strong and powerful. * Status, power or prestige of role models also generally increases their influence, especially on boys: "In accordance…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 11:43 AM
3

A character doesn't have to be realistic or his status attainable to convey that a certain attitude is cool, or an ideal is worth pursueing. Don't you think shows like Sex and the City influence women's attitudes about relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 10:34 PM
3

No but I do think they shape attitudes about dating/relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 10:10 PM
1

Not all such characters have very high status (Hank Moody, Barney, Joey), and even though their status may be unrelatable, these characters do convey the message that: To be a ladies man you have to be dominant with women, not submissive. 2. Being like that is cool: these characters are mostly presented in such a way that the audience sympathizes with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 09:34 PM
1

That there characters are fictional or unrealistic doesn't negate the message they convey: To be a ladies man you have to be dominant, not submissive. 2. Being like that is cool: these characters are mostly presented in such a way that the audience sympathizes with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 09:17 PM
5

They might be hamstering and totally believe their own rationalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 07:40 AM
1

I agreed with you that some men feel they've been lied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 10:58 PM
5

Here's a list
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 10:12 PM
3

James Bond ... post WWII cold war era ... 1945-1980 Kirk ... Future (really 1960's Mad Men era USA) ... 1960s Casanova ... 1700's Because of hormonal birth control and third wave Feminism the reality of the dating/marriage market has changed drastically during the last two decades. Tony Stark (Iron man), Barney (HIMYM), Hank Moody (Californication), Face (the A-team), Joey (Friends). Yup, eternal bachelors, RP truth right there. Edit Here's a list.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 10:07 PM
0

She had sex with him, I don't see the problem.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 08:11 PM
4

I know of no studies that look into the amount of sexual partners and marital satisfaction or divorce in men. If anyone does, I'd like to hear.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 11:21 PM
1

When you design a test and you choose the items either men or women score higher on, the test is not a valid measure to compare intelligence between the sexes. If you think this is dumb, go publish an article like they did, explaining why.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 09:40 PM
-1

5- Men and women have different interests: women are more interested in people and men more in things. The source also shows that girls in the top 1% of math and science ability in high school were less interested in math and science and took less related courses compared to similar boys. 6- Men are more likely to work overtime. Also, there is a problem with this: Mean IQ of men exceeds by 3-5 points that of females - There are multiple studies about this[3] Another[4] From one of your sources::…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 11:47 AM
5

Brave women don't procreate.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 12:32 AM
2

But women who have high status themselves have difficulty with finding a partner. Women also often look for a signs of status in a man in relation to themselves, like: 'does he take shit from me' or: 'is he worried about me not liking him'. It all seems like women usually want a partner they can look up to. To be in a relationship as a woman means submitting. And noone wants to submit to a person they feel superior to.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 10:25 PM
2

You guys should pick better women. NAWALT. Unicorns. Yeah. You're in love. You don't see the real person. I read shit like this and not only is it over generalized stereotypical bullshit, Just about everything's a generalization. This generalization has helped lots of guys with women which goes to show there's some validity. Your approach, every woman is a unique snowflake, leads most men to frustration and heartbreak. It's more than a generalization if you state that there really are no better …
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 08:56 AM
2

NAWALT apparently.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 09:51 PM
10

Thiefs who put stuff in the vault.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 09:47 PM
1

A skill is not necessarily the ability to do something that is difficult: The ability to do something well; expertise: 'difficult work, taking great skill' A particular ability: 'the basic skills of cooking'
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 02:56 PM
0

Was dumb enough to marry me you mean.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 10:08 PM
1

Do these people have comparable careers to their wives and still have to pay alimony?
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 08:21 PM
1

It's unlikely because women are marrying up (and men down). Again, I could be wrong about your laws but I thought gender alone is no issue in alimony. So a woman with a career comparable to that of her man wouldn't get anything in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 08:11 PM
1

I don't know what's it like where you're from but here people need the lowest level of high school (whereas college requires the highest level).
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:21 PM
2

People who "can't cook" just don't want to give it a serious shot because they (and people in general) look down upon the activity. Sure, the first time you do it you make some mistakes, but very soon you'll get the hang of it. I'm being downvoted because people here assume girls say they can't cook because they don't want to follow their gender role. I'm just pointing out why that reason alone doesn't make much sense. If cooking was difficult and held in high regard they would be proud of it.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:19 PM
1

I can cook fine. People love it when I make Christmas dinners. I just don't need to pretend that everything I do well is a difficult skill.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:06 PM
0

It's not difficult to read a recipe, plan time, cut food, put food in pan and wait for it to be done. We're not talking about haute cuisine here.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:36 PM
5

This is incredibly warped and unreasonable when women these days are going to college and having their own careers and can support themselves. Maybe I don't understand your laws correctly but the more a woman makes the less she gets in divorce, right? I mean there are celebs (Britney Spears) who had to pay their ex-husband a large amount of money.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:32 PM
1

It's not bad. Although if you want to get away from it... drug addicts like to talk about drugs because it engages the same reward centers just talking/thinking about drugs. Maybe it's the same with sex but I don't think it's possible to avoid this.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:26 PM
-5

Requirements for cooking school are very basic. Here in the Netherlands you only need the lowest level of high school to enter. Sure high cuisine is difficult, but we're talking about normal cooking skill here, those you might expect from a woman.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:22 PM
-2

You only need to finish high school to enter cooking school.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:17 PM
1

I can cook fine. But I don't pretend it's a skill.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:16 PM
-9

Some people love knitting and are very good at it.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 01:56 PM
-28

Cooking is hardly a skill. It's saying one is incapable of doing a boring and simple task. It's like a man saying: "I could never work at Mcdonalds."
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 01:14 PM
1

Can't look at him and not think of Shinzon.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 11:35 AM
8

She wants a large crowd of people to see her doing something disgusting/humiliating. It's a fetish. Hunter Moore is just a tool for obtaining that.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 11:30 AM
1

Women may get pissed off about something like getting passed over by another woman for a promotion but their entire existence within the human tribe is not dependent on status the way it is for men. It was though. If a woman could not secure a partner she had nobody to protect her and no access to resources. Her existence therefore depended on her being desirable as a life partner. Nowadays she can take care of herself, but so can men.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 11:01 AM
1

success as a society I'm wondering if a society will benefit in the long term from keeping all beta genes in the gene pool.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 10:45 AM
3

It's the weekly "10 things other people should do" article with bitchy comments...
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 10:41 AM
20

"oh, I don't cook/can't cook" "I am wealthy enough to have someone else cook for me."
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 10:22 AM
1

Marriage has benefits, but you're not going to fight the advantages of winning a war for men with it (temporary marriages, loot, status).
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 10:19 AM
1

By... other men, yes. However, I meant war in tribal times because it's in those ciscumstances that we spend most of our time evolving. A man who could not spread his genes or gain status and resources in his own tribe still had the possibility to attain these things through war. Cruel as it is, through either winning or losing the problem solved itself.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:54 AM
-11

"Bitch" sounds shameful though. Men do not necessarily respect their sexual partners. Women do this (in general) because they wouldn't want to get inpregnated by someone they don't respect.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:41 AM
6

Now these lower 130 guys can still usually find women to date. The woman is probably a 6 at best but they can land her. These women have nearly always been out and slept with other men before settling down. So now these poor guys have the choice of women who have had 15 or more sexual partners and they themselves have not had any casual sex. Yet they keep getting told "You shouldn't slut shame, you keep complaining about not getting sex yet you keep discouraging those women!". The sexual revolut…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:36 AM
1

It only means you are thinking a lot about sex.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:34 AM
1

Could they have occured without large numbers of men willing to fight?
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:32 AM
3

My observation of what men find funny heavily involves wit or a joke at the expense of someone. This, and sex.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 11:13 AM
14

Another way to control the excess of betas was war, so yeah.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 06:18 PM
1

Do you find your responsibilities difficult? And do you suffer from lack of support?
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 06:13 PM
1

Because being a "real man" and getting laid seems much less important here than in the US, meaning women have less power over men and act accordingly. Compare Dutch and American culture on masculinity here, a definition of the dimension can be found here and sources here.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 01:03 PM
3

I'm curious whether RP will work here. We don't have a very masculine culture.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:03 AM
2

What did she make you do?
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 10:04 PM
-1

(eg: if people keep hitting on you and telling you you're beautiful, hot men keep sexing you, betas keep buying stuff/orbiting and etc you will believe your value is higher than it is because of social feedback) . How is their smv then defined if not by this feedback?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 10:57 PM
0

Are you fucking kidding me? Depression and anxiety are mental disorders. They are not good. They are emotions caused by chemicals in your brain. They can be alleviated by ingesting other chemicals. They are not rational thoughts. I didn't say mental disorders were thoughts or that they were good, what are you talking about? Ok, but when women are put in positions of power where they can't be agreeable, they are bitches. 90% of women say they would rather work for men. Women aren't "naturally" ni…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 06:26 PM
2

There are problems with some of your statements: This is a wild oversimplification, but mental illness is basically when a person’s weak emotions become too strong and a person’s logical mind cannot control them. It is due to the capability of abstract thinking, foreseeing potential future scenarios and logic that anxiety or depressive disorders are prevalent in the human species. Depressive patients can give you a very accurate and logical account of why their life is meaningless and why they'r…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 10:34 AM
2

AWALT... the crazy bitch ex is a trope because it happens so much in reality. It's one of the downsides of female hypergamy / male hypogamy.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 07:04 AM
-5

Yeah, actually, like in war.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 04:37 PM
-2

"Men kill, maim and traumatise, women are catty" is the message I got.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 09:11 AM
5

And beauty likely correlates with entitledment, being spoiled and acting slutty.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 03:40 PM
1

And she liked it so much that she wanted to keep doing it. Apparently you're not big enough to punish her lol. So much for revenge...
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 10:11 AM
-5

I first thought this album was meant to show how brutal men are compared to women.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 09:52 AM
1

Perhaps provide an equal stressor to people and measure their physiological stress response and task performance. Good maintainace of task performance with a high stress response implies more effective coping mehanisms. However, disengagement from a task due to stress or distraction by stressors that are not task-related can also be usefull in real life (especially for women who are more vulnerable), so perhaps you'll have to provide several different types of tasks. You could then measure vigil…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 11:35 AM
0

You don't understand. His feelings were hurt so he was wronged.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 09:15 PM
3

True, but it's a lot more difficult to travel, make career, spend energy on hobbies... Kids aren't very interesting, at least not to others.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 08:36 AM
12

Starting a family can also be compensation for an uninteresting life.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 10:30 PM
5

At one point in the future it will make no difference how many children you had. People feel more at ease with their own mortality by believing that they somehow live on in their offspring, but this is all completely irrational.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 10:26 PM
1

Few exceptions aside, women have been allowed access to universities only since the 19th century.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 07:57 PM
2

The post was about women never being oppressed.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 07:56 PM
3

No one was talking about the present.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 07:19 PM
2

If access to education only relied on intellect and money, there was no reason to deny wealthy smart women access.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 07:17 PM
1

No, that's called a fact. I don't think you understand what black and white[1] ) thinking is. Examples would be "teach men not to rape" or "because the top of society is men, all men share the benefits of the top of society." Black and white would be: "Feminism is based on Marxism and therefore is and always was bad. And if you disagree with me you condone unjust treatment of men." See how absolute this is? It's very easy though to poke a hole in this way of thinking by simply providing one exam…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 07:14 PM
2

Yeah, that's the black and white thinking I was talking about. Either you honestly believe that's the only way it would play out or you're purposely using and emotionally manipulative example. Which is it? Because you use it to preemptively disarm arguments against, and lead into, your next claim: No, stating Feminism is based on Marxism is black and white. Letting the other person imagine being in a certain position in order to let him come to your own conclusions is nuanced. Feelings != facts.…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:49 PM
2

The basis of feminism can just as well come from the individual. Say you're not a poor woman from before 1850 and you wanted to learn in order to understand the world or contribute to science. Well, you can't. And if you try you're seen as a pushy bitch trying to invade men's spaces. Furthermore you're shamed for not wanting to marry young and have children. You don't need to adhere to any ideology to feel frustrated and oppressed by this.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:14 PM
1

OP claims feminism was never justified. I see you disagree as well.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:44 PM
1

OP's post says: "bizarre, unnatural religion or mythology that claims women were oppressed".
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:41 PM
1

Few exceptions aside, women have been allowed access to universities only since the 19th century.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 03:30 PM
3

What about women who wanted to learn and accomplish something? They weren't always allowed to do so.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 03:21 PM
1

Which year is that? I've watched it a couple of years and there were never problems like this in the women's camp.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 01:03 PM
3

The guy was building the raft because he didn't feel at ease in the group. Btw Edit (the buff woman) won.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 12:29 PM
5

Men score higher in Openness to Ideas, while women score higher in others such as Openness to Aesthetics and Feelings. Men evinced more Intellectual Interests, and women more Aesthetic Interests. Women prefer working with people, whereas men prefer working with things. See: Review Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Costa PT Jr, Terracciano A, McCrae RR J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug; 81(2):322-31. See also this lecture: http://youtu.be/yOJR-nE…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 12:17 PM
9

He doesn't have any money and she doesn't go out, I don't see how her actions differ from her words.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 12:00 PM
2

The person who cares less has all the power. Nobody wants to be the one who’s more interested. Disagree, a date with someone you're not or only slightly interested in is the worst. Because we want to show how cavalier and blasé we can be to the other person, little psychological games like ‘Intentionally Take Hours Or Days To Text Back’ will happen. They aren’t fun. Having to respond to every clingy text you get isn't fun either. Not texting too much shows you aren't needy. Any person you get ro…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 11:44 AM
10

they will boast their moronic conquests, and their girlfriends will make their ego boost by saying "you go girl." It's like a guy boasting about having a girl suck his dick or having anal sex with him. Reminds me of the weekly field reports.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 05:33 PM
0

You say men are realizing they no longer need women. Meaning that men needed women before, in the time when women still needed men.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 11:23 AM
0

If a man has no desire to procreate then half of that equation is gone. If a man is MGTOW or voluntarily celibate then he does not need them for sex either. At that point women lose their appeal to men. Problem is that men are still biologically programmed to desire and seek the regard of women, whether they want to procreate or not. A woman's disregard or even neglect is fairly upsetting for a man. This is why OP is upset that women don't need men nowadays.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 11:16 AM
3

Plates usually don't care about being provided for.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 08:20 PM
3

No, I don't plan on being someone's walking ATM.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 08:04 PM
2

If only the role of women was as desirable as the role of men, there would be no problems.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 08:03 PM
-1

The truth is, a world of women who don't need men has created a world of men who realise they no longer need women. Are you saying men need women to need them?
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 07:45 PM
2

If men are objectively much better at it, why is empathy culturally considered a female virtue? It seems ridiculous in light of women's rather Machiavellian social tendencies. Because there are a vast amount of scientific studies supporting it. In accordance with this, psychiatric disorders such as those in the autism spectrum, conduct disorder, and antisocial personality disorder, which are often characterized by a lack of empathy, are far more common among males.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 09:39 PM
3

The story has all the good tropes: impossible love, plot twists, duty before passion... It's like Dante and Beatrice.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 02:23 AM
5

Impossible passionate love before marrying someone else has always been regarded as great romance
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 02:15 AM
5

Perhaps they wanted to tell you upfront that they would behave badly if you got into a long term relationship with them. So be glad that you didn't.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 12:19 AM
0

But they like the financial benefit of marriage and make sure in the years that follow they continue to receive it. Compensation of one's lost career doesn't seem worth it me. They've still lost friends, freedom and years of their youth. I never blamed men for early marriage being a bad deal for women. Women choose to do so themselves (either for money, for love or for social status) so they themselves are to blame for unhappiness in marriage.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 12:02 AM
0

See the problem is what women say when they're 23-25 years old (why should I ruin the best years of my life just to be a first mate blah blah blah...) Is profoundly different to what they say when they reach 29-32 (Where have all the good men gone? Where's my golden marriage parachute?) And a couple of years later 80% finds out marriage isn't all that and they like cats better. Men take monumental risks in marriage. When they fail - men take on the lion's share of the negative consequences. If m…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 11:02 PM
-1

Do women have a good reason to marry though? Besides for taking a man's money if they're total bitches. Sure, the first years when you're in love are nice. But to give up the years you're in your sexual prime or your career to be first mate for the rest of your life... to have a boring, looked down upon life at home with annoying kids while your body is ruined by being pregnant... Doesn't seem like a very good deal.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:25 PM
4

You think marrying young will help you make a better choice and prevent divorce?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 11:14 AM
1

We shouldn't walk up straight because our legs are not designed for it. - homo pre-erectus
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:56 AM
2

There used to be a link to trp in the sidebar of /r/conservative.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:39 AM
3

What disturbs me is while I'm not that great looking (certainly not bad looking, though a bit unkempt due to apathy and alcoholism) there is no mental "dance" on their end that I still do to hot chicks even at my SMV. They're not testing this guy to see if he's full of shit or to see if he's intelligent. It's just a verbal "bend over and please fuck me." Gender roles reversed.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:28 AM
1

Wouldn't you?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:19 AM
2

Like awesome sex.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 12:46 AM
-6

Shhh we're here to feel good about ourselves.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 12:39 AM
-3

Of course it isn't cheating, that's not the point here. It's weird to tell someone you love them and then be over it after a few days. This means that either: 1) he didn't really love her 2) he did but wanted to show her he was also desirable 3) he did and wanted or take revenge on her by pretending he never really loved her. It's like kindergarten: "You don't wanna be my friend? Fine, I never really liked you anyway!" But oh well, you can't expect high school students to be mature about these t…
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 11:24 AM
-13

If OP found a new chick so quickly he apparently never really loved this girl. OP had thus been a lying Nice Guy to her. Something she was probably very familiar with.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 09:57 AM
-25

To be fair, she never claimed she loved him.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 02:19 AM
0

Marriage = bad for everyone.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 01:28 PM
1

Because information passed on in ideas is more relevant than that passed on in genes.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 01:26 PM
1

If more people find them attractive than they are of superior attractiveness. Perhaps humans will evolve out of it one day.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 01:57 PM
1

Depends on how you define attractive. I'd say being attractive is being rated as attractive. So girls are on average more attractive than guys.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 01:53 PM
13

It's not dreaming if guys are attracted to them, which is what the study shows.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 11:45 PM
1

Did women rate them as less attractive?
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 10:09 PM
1

For men it is, because men have to prove their worth to attract potential partners. Women don't.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 11:26 PM
-1

Getting a partner is not the same as being accepted by society. Only for men it is, because it shows you've somehow "proven your worth" to get a woman. Women don't have to do that. This is why men are more worried about being single than women are.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 11:03 PM
4

Same is true, with reversed roles, in porn.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 11:58 AM
0

Posting in a sub filled with people who he knows probably do care, it's not likely he meant 'no one' literally.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 02:24 PM
2

Heh the only friend who likes to talk about the cock carrousel is gay. My friends are mostly christian.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 10:19 AM
5

My aunt never married and she works for ZOA, so she travels around the world and has lots to tell about other cultures, refugees and the politics in war zones. A friend of mine studies physics/astronomy and she's goddamn awkward and self conscious so she has the best cringe stories about herself and fellow awkward students. Another friend I think has theatrical personality disorder: very funny to listen to but tiring after a while. The only friend I have who talks about the cock carrousel is gay…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 10:16 AM
5

Actually, men are more impulsive (/r/holdmybeer), more aggressive, dominant, violent, deliquent and it's not surprising that psychopathy is more prevalent in men
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 02:03 AM
2

They can actually be pretty cool. Housewives often have few friends and little freedom (because responsibilities, no male friends allowed) and thus have no stories to tell except those about their children/husband/household which are mostly not very interesting to anybody.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 01:20 AM
-1

Solipsism: Extreme egocentrism allows women to secure the best mate at any cost. However, this also means that to be a woman's alpha, you don't need to be the alpha of the world, just the alpha of her world. This makes no sense. In order to secure the best mate, a more objective point of view is more useful than a solipsistic one. These traits contribute to seemingly illogical behaviors (hamstering, transience, unaccountability, etc.). Unaccountable women risk getting abandoned, which was bad fo…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:35 AM
2

Because it's a hyperbole.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 10:14 PM
5

Perhaps she thought that her job in the relationship was only to provide sex.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 08:13 AM
2

It is provable that women were excluded from universities in the middle ages and were not allowed to write about theology (which coincided with science at that time).
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 05:50 PM
2

Aversion to short hair you mean. Well, I don't think it has to do with actually being vulnerable or not, I think it has more to do with the willingness or unwillingness to be perceived as vulnerable. Perhaps women who cut their hair short prefer to look cool and spunky over looking vulnerable, traditional and perhaps more graceful. Men in general find long hair more attractive, but men who are really annoyed by short hair may do so because they have difficulties with attracting women. They thems…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/14 08:10 PM
8

TRP appears to take the stance that men (some are even claiming all men) prefer women with long hair, and that women with short hair are in some way giving the finger to all straight men. Perhaps this is due to red pill men's stronger than average preference for vulnerable women. Men having trouble with dating are likely to end up in /r/theredpill and will prefer vulnerable women since these are more likely to look up to them. Long hair (just like high heels or most skirts/dresses) conveys vulne…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/14 12:18 PM
-1

It's not only cited in the same journal, so an impact factor of 0.00 is not possible. I thought you understood that. It might be inaccurate because the journal stopped in 2011. Look, it's obvious that YOU don't want to discuss: twice you've given me a short bogus answer while I go through the trouble of answering everything, you forced me to summarize the conversation for you, go behind my back trying to discredit me... you don't make your case look very strong here. However, assuming others don…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 06:30 PM
-1

I thought this discussion was over? Response to these points already given here. Many of the subjects in this subreddit cannot be discussed properly without sources. As long as all participants of the discussion have access to the papers so they can review the method, impact etc., I don't see what's wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 05:10 PM
-1

Ah, I didn't expect this was a rule. Perhaps a flair for discussions about science, so people can expect paywalled articles there? I reckon there are enough students and academics in here who do have access to create some discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 02:47 PM
1

Please don't put words into my mouth. I'm saying the men in study 1 are not comparable to the general population of men or women. I made no mention of the women there. It doesn't matter the gender relationship in study one, because they are all outliers anyways, both men and women. Well, you're forcing me to repeat and summarize the whole discussion. Then you complain that I do so wrongly. So you said that only the men differ from general population. I pointed out that with the same reasoning fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 10:55 AM
-3

You say the women in study 1 are not comparable to the men, I say they are from the same demographic. You say study 2 is in a journal with no impact, I say the methodology seems fine and argue why. You say one can assume that boys overtake girls at later age (after 20?), I say you'd have to make an extra assumption that does not fit with the other data. You say boys are judged more harshly than girls (I doubt it, "boys will be boys"), I say this does not have to affect justifying actions to your…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 11:28 PM
-1

On my phone so I can't check the articles but I'd like to give a brief response. Your first source looks at negotiating skills in aspiring business students. These are not average people, these are people learning how to manipulate their environment to create money from nothing. The paper even spends a paragraph talking about Bernie Madoff. Wall Street is not populated by average men. It is populated by testosterone-heavy alpha males who take risks and don't mind hurting people that get in their…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 10:55 PM
2

In all cases it's about the ways in which people explain their actions when these are going against their general morals, whether it's aggression, going to war or sexual behavior. I'd say the first two actually require stronger hamstering because sex is usually much less harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 10:20 PM
2

All studies cover ways in which people explain and judge their own unethical actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 09:40 PM
4

How is hamstering not covered by the keywords I used?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 09:15 PM
3

What is the scientific term for hamstering according to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 08:48 PM
0

Ahhhh.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 08:32 PM
1

Is this why gifted children often don't end up well when they are adults?
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 08:09 PM
0

Sooo are you in an LTR with Jane now or not?
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 07:51 PM
1

Can you elaborate? What doesn't work and why not?
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 08:03 PM
0

I disagree with them being friendzoned. I know men who have no problem at all with expressing attraction, but they still have female friends with whom they talk about the women they date or are attracted to. Sometimes they already have had sex with these female friends sometime in the past. It seems almost like those women are in the friendzone. When female attraction is very important to men in a certain culture, this gives women tremendous power. Not many can handle such power responsibly, esp…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:56 PM
14

Dutchy here. I think European men on average care less about getting laid than American men do. It seems to me that Americans are obsessed with it. I don't see this in most of the (college) guys I know. I do see many friendships beween men and women around me. It's also very telling in this regard that Europeans care less about building muscle than Americans do. Furthermore, there are studies stating that north Europe is on average culturally more feminine than the US. So if getting laid is more…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:50 PM
3

Yes but you changed due to negative experiences (I assume), while she had none. Everything was working out fine for her until it didn't anymore and then it was too late to change.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 02:26 AM
-1

You said: "terrible impulse control, sexually, socially, and otherwise", and the last paragraph of my source says the sex difference in criminal behavior has been "traced back to lower levels of self-control in men".
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 05:55 PM
-2

Ironic since every single piece of evidence points toward women being the ones with terrible impulse control, sexually, socially, and otherwise. On the contrary: "Aggressive behavior as such need not be learned; it can be observed even in toddlers at the age of 1–2 years. At this early developmental stage it is also apparent that boys are physically more aggressive than girls (Potegal & Archer, 2004). Across normal development, however, children learn how to deal with aggressive impulses in a so…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 03:32 PM
-9

Wanting to dominate and control others is typically masculine.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 11:41 AM
-6

It's macho culture which shames men who work with children because "that's inferior work for women".
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 11:34 AM
2

"We should learn from her!"
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 11:11 AM
9

Itz only smells?
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 11:03 AM
13

A more accurate translation would be: "they don't notice me".
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 01:22 AM
1

It's not very admirable if the only good thing they have to offer is sexiness.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 01:04 AM
1

You mean the one who loved somebody else more than she loved you?
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 10:35 AM
0

Oh I got it. There's no question mark, see.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 09:31 AM
-4

Getting her to like porn maybe worked a little too well.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 12:50 AM
4

I thought women can't work together?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 12:48 AM
-1

What I think he should do is play major dread game, up to and including picking up other women and fucking them. Now, before anyone says that's going too far, she' already mentally cheated; everyone knows what she was gonna do if she won. What
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 12:36 AM
6

Post-hoc rationalization, or when regarding moral issues: moral disengagement or self-justification.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 03:58 PM
2

Because she's a doormat.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 03:48 PM
15

Speaking with such a voice is typically American. I'm often amazed at the way American women talk and are yet taken seriously. Pitch goes all over the place, occasionally reaching frequencies only perceivable for dolphins, with very typical sharp 's'ses or vocal fry... It sound more annoying than submissive.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 12:17 PM
0

True, it explains behavior but doesn't excuse it. But knowing this, I find it all the more admirable when people behave against these tendencies.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 12:29 AM
0

This. The tribes with women willing to sacrifice their life have died out, while those with men doing the same have prospered.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 08:52 PM
2

Gotta love them traditional values.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/13 01:47 PM
0

Those posts are disapproving though.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/13 09:19 PM
6

I think sperm-killing condoms exist, or at least sperm killing lube. Use that and you can just throw them in the bin.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 04:16 PM
30

HmMMMMmmm.... I assume people look in the trash can when they throw something in it, and think "hey that's weird, we just had sex and there's no condom". Or they want to give the trash a push and think: "gotta be careful, don't want to touch that icky condom we just used, oh hey there is none."
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 04:13 PM
2

I'm not saying it is.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 03:51 PM
1

OP doesn't seem to think she was cheating though.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 02:25 PM
6

Men are devastated by the thought of their SO's having sex with others. This has to do with the possibility of them investing their resources in somebody else's offspring. Thus natural selection favored those men who felt disgust and did not want to partner up with women who were promiscuous with other men. When seeing a video of their SO having sex with somebody else, the brain cannot easily tell the difference between something that has happened once in the past and something that is happening…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 02:21 PM
1

If society holds a man in high regard, this means she'll be safe with him. Popularity does not only signal high value, it IS high value no matter how it's obtained.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 10:20 PM
1

It's not only a sign of high value, to women it IS high value. A man who is popular means safety to her.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 10:16 PM
1

There should be a word for the hamstering of one's conviction that others are hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 08:07 PM
-9

I thought only women used shame tactics.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 08:00 PM
16

But not everybody has to have the same opinion in here, right? It doesn't seem like she's trolling or trying to insult people, at least not with this post. I think different perspectives, if presented well, actually improve the sub.
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/13 02:02 PM
2

Stupid betas!
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 05:18 PM
0

If you regard being rude to women as brave or thrilling then, it means you value their opinions of you way too much.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 09:47 AM
6

A masculine star would also have these things, plus masculinity.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 09:31 AM
5

If you're really bored, say those things to a big meathead.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 09:23 AM
25

Alpha shame, beta shame.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 04:22 AM
0

No, people laugh a bit at them, 'how sad', and then their friends will try and help them get laid.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 11:34 PM
-1

It's a bit weird though that sluts are not regarded as just biologic failures, no, they're 'disgusting' and 'worthless'. Think about the shitstorm it would cause if people said this about virgin males.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 10:56 PM
5

Link?
/r/TheRedPill23/11/13 12:03 PM
3

She raised his smv by grabbing him and he lowered hers by grabbing her. He meant well but he's solipsistic. His friends sound like bullies through.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 08:25 AM
-2

Provided that everyone marries and has kids, and that the father has a job which pays enough to provide for the whole family. Even then, I wouldn't compare work inside the home with a real job. Overall, this would mean that women contribute more now.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/13 12:09 AM
-3

The resources for women and children used to be provided 100% by men, but not anymore.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 11:45 PM
-6

Less so than before then, at least an improvement.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 11:06 PM
-5

Although the taxpayer's money is generated by both men and women while in the other case it's only men providing.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 10:55 PM
0

Well, no-one is talking about this one either.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 02:37 PM
0

But this would make sense? If she doesn't care about settling down at all, she also won't care about not being able to settle down after 30.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 01:14 PM
0

So, in summary: women don't need the father to raise the child but do require him to pay for said child This would be the traditional division of tasks though, lol.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 10:15 AM
0

Did she mean she doesn't understand why they settle down so late or why they settle down at all?
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 09:42 AM
0

Isn't feminine weak then?
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 09:37 AM
1

She is justifying her masculine attitude and energy while at the same time attempting to admit that its not working. Why would these be mutual exclusive? Someone may not want to be looked down upon while also realising that this will probably kill their chances of a romantic relationship.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 09:34 AM
1

Then macho singers should outcompete sensitive singers.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/13 08:07 AM
3

Good reasoning. However, having sex to brag about is what everyone wants, but women have also historically benefitted most from partnering up with high status males. These are most guaranteed to keep their women and children safe and secure resources for them.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/13 08:06 AM
1

It may also have to do with the fact that women are less competitive inter-group wise.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 08:15 PM
3

Haha this is like sunday school all over again. How dare you ask a good question.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 01:12 PM
0

Can you give a different example then, of a woman with low/no smv and who men are likely to care about? And if having low smv means one has little value, doesn't that mean that men with social anxiety have little value as well?
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 08:50 AM
-6

Ok.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 06:36 PM
-7

Wouldn't a (future) male employer judge you in the same way though? I would not want my boss to see me wearing a minecraft shirt or to know how much time I spend on games...
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 05:04 PM
6

"When are you going to behave in a way I perceive as mature?" For women, maturity equals caring for children and being in a long term relationship because this is the way their own maturity is judged.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 02:56 PM
8

From the link: "Response: It should be remembered that one’s sexual history, marital status, parental status, etc. are not reliable indicators of maturity and accountability. If they were, then we would not hear of white collar crime, divorce, teen sex, unplanned pregnancies, extramarital affairs, etc." I don't understand the reasoning in this response. So if sexual history, marital status, parental status etc. are reliable indicators of maturity we would not hear of immature/irresponsible behav…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 02:52 PM
1

We all know the stereotypes - Women infight, Men work together. I did a quick scan of the scientific literature for evidence for this hypothesis. I searched for "gender" and "cooperation" on scholar.google.com. The first 10 results were: 1st result: Men contribute more to the group when inter-group competition is present. Identification with their group predicts cooperation with that group. "Women, on average, contributed more to their group than men did across our three experiments." Also from …
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 01:59 PM
-1

Love how you pick one of the seven synonyms the dictionary gives and say I am picking and searching. I wish there was more high quality content on trp and not this shit which is just proving feminists right. It's making us all look bad.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 09:44 PM
-1

Aversion means a strong dislike or disinclination (= abhorrence, hatred, loathing, detesting, hostility etc.). A relationship costs time, energy and emotional investment. Therefore, in order to start one there must be a certain amount of attraction. This does not mean that when someone does not want to start one (say, with a stay at home man) there has to be a negative amount of attraction i.e. aversion. One could simply be not attracted enough or have zero attraction (and zero aversion). Saying…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 06:10 PM
0

Say, you're just minding your own business and someone comes up to you asking to hang out, and you answer: "no thanks, I like minding my own business". Does that mean you have an aversion towards that person? Of course not. It would only be implied if you are someone who always likes to hang out with anybody.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 05:23 PM
0

I agree with this statement. Phrasing it this way is important because aversion implies that the normal reaction should be attraction. I don't know about you but I wouldn't like it if people had such expectations of me and took offence when I'm not attracted to them.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 04:56 PM
0

Them not willing to date such men does not imply aversion, only lack of attraction.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 04:10 PM
0

You have no right to dictate what she does, but she also has no right to dictate what you do. Please marry me!
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 07:55 AM
-1

Just looks like the ol' "women who don't want sex with me are evil bitches" kind of reasoning.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/13 08:17 PM
-2

Wait, finding someone not attractive enough for a relationship does not mean you don't respect them or see them as beneath you.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/13 01:19 AM
2

It beats getting looked down upon. Athough... no kids and living on Curaçao would be totally worth it.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 05:57 PM
0

She didn't say she felt sorry about it though. Could be she realised that a relationship isn't what she wants.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 05:33 PM
0

In the second example he gets offspring but he doesn't have to provide for it, the male and female taxpayers do.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 09:20 AM
2

It's because men are attracted to looks and not to accomplishments. Natural selection thus favours women who care about their looks. Do you not want to be found attractive by the other sex? Isn't the red pill all about attaining that?
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 08:18 PM
0

So the child is either provided for by one men, or by the taxpayers who are mostly men. Isn't the first worse for 'men' then?
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 07:53 PM
5

Don't get into a relationship with someone like that.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 07:13 PM
2

That's why they suck?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:35 PM
0

I don't see a problem. Why should everyone marry? Because some will whine they can't find a man when they're older? We shouldn't care too much about that.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 09:32 AM
4

Hm, I once searched for scientific studies that investigated if gender plays a part in hamstering. Keywords I used were "self-justification", "post-hoc rationalization", "moral hypocrisy" and "moral disengagement". What I found were a number of studies in which no effect of gender was found and some that actually showed that men were the bigger hamsters. (This one, this one, this one, and this one). Wiki article with a brief description of the term "moral disengagement".
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 12:06 AM
15

They won't marry.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 11:32 PM
2

Maybe he meant illogical instead of irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 06:00 PM
-2

I think it's a bit more complicated. If you're an ugly fat girl, it would take dedication and skill to work out, find ways to make yourself look more beautiful and be funny/charming to get laid more or with more attractive men. And if you're a handsome, charming but very religious man? Then it would take dedication to stay abstinent. edit: These exceptions aside, I agree with the rule and I like the inherited million dollar analogy. It's a pity though that some people scoff at those who spend th…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 04:02 PM
1

But they were trying to get pregnant. It doesn't make sense.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 03:41 PM
3

The best way to get her husband's money was staying with him. The only thing in the story I don't get is why she left him as soon as found out she was pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 09:11 AM
3

It's a Skinner box: random rewards work way better in steering behavior.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/13 11:17 PM
4

Yes, people who get spoiled a lot are spoiled people...
/r/TheRedPill28/09/13 02:50 PM
1

Heh, there are two users admitting in these comments that they use false information to misguide doxxers.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/13 09:41 PM
2

So be more like that woman (who doesn't care about anyone) then?
/r/TheRedPill22/09/13 03:01 PM
1

Women having learned they're allowed to be bitchy.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 07:04 PM
7

This is true, though I can understand a girl not wanting to have sex if there's a fight going on.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 07:02 PM
1

Someone is not walking away from her.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 06:51 PM
-1

I often read complaints about mothers giving incorrect dating advice (see: this thread). If she's a mom and she's not divorced, surely she is a caught fish who can recall and explain what attracted her?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 07:29 AM
1

Some men she met found it frustrating to have to be the provider and always man up.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 09:56 PM
1

I don't understand this. Are you saying women don't want you to get (catch) a woman?
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 09:48 PM
14

Men don't put other men though hell like that because these other men don't let them.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/13 07:09 AM
5

Isn't that how you treat normal people though: not putting up with their shit?
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 09:52 PM
1

When looking at certain traits, men on average score differently than women do. But many people deviate somewhat from this average, and some deviate a lot from it. There is always variation within a species. You can't use these averages to predict everyone's behavior and needs.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/13 12:48 PM
5

Heh, I WANT you to be mature and rational but I NEED you to be young and naieve.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 12:10 AM
0

'Solipsism' is being used in the same way as 'privilege' here.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/13 11:52 PM
1

The first definition of discrimination applies in this context. The discussions are aways about whether a different treatment based on gender is really unjust or not.
/r/askTRP03/09/13 09:34 PM
4

Well, they're good for cash too if you ask their boyfriends.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/13 09:00 AM
-1

Depends on whether they are underaged.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 08:30 PM
-5

Blue-pill women are those who don't understand the mechanics of sexual attraction and have incorrect presumptions about it. They believe they need to be educated, funny and have a nice career to get the best man. Just like blue-pill men believe they need to be sweet and caring to get the best woman. They both haven't realized that the opposite sex is actually attracted to different traits. This leads to fear, anger, hate and suffering.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 07:09 PM
1

This is what men on average do value. However, you don't need much humor to get other people's jokes compared to making your own jokes.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 12:29 PM
2

The women in the clip make two jokes at the expense of themselves and their gender before answering the question (correctly), which elicited much laughter. Then the pretty one also mocks the fact of the absence of female comedians by telling a bogus story about the reason why. The only one "insulting" someone else in this clip is the man.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 10:09 AM
1

The most evil one around. :D
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 07:40 AM
0

Because men on average don't value humor in women.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 10:35 PM
3

It's better to also take possible mediating factors into account: What type of relationship is found between gender and giving depends strongly on the other variables included in the empirical analyses. The more socio-economic variables, such as age, income and educational level, are included in the models examining charitable giving, the smaller the reported gender differences in giving are. It is thus no surprise that the findings on gender differences in giving vary between empirical studies.…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 03:19 PM
0

The good news here is that a large body of research shows that you will gain more happiness by being married than by having a good job. Only if you compare married people with single people. Studies with a more correct, longitudinal design however found that getting married did not make people any happier and that satisfaction with the relationship actually decreased over time. Even though this research was biased in favor of married people because they only included those who stayed married.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/13 05:16 PM
5

Ahh the ol' "I didn't like you anyway". Classic way of immediate revenge and preserving self esteem. She had it coming though for breaking up over the phone and going to a radio show with it.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 01:32 PM
6

Aren't women forced to be mature when they have to take care of children though? Negating their own wishes of how to spend time and energy and spend it on their child instead. I'd say this caused selection pressure on maturity in women.
/r/RedPillWomen21/08/13 01:20 PM
1

Discussion: The target is accused of having no romantic potential as far as women are concerned. Romance doesn't necessarily mean marriage (romantic love usually doesn't last very long) and men might also feel less inclined to marry and more inclined to divorce when women are more economically independent. There's no shame in any of that. Who would do them? People who choose those job over other less dangerous but perhaps more boring office or cleaning jobs. Or men who take pride in these jobs b…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/13 12:12 PM
1

There is another option: Not propping up useless people. Your leftism is... Well, it just is. Let me guess, two party system? People without a job are going to get means to provide for themselves, one way or the other. And here is the feminist bias. I salute you for waiting this long to introduce shame language. How is this shame language? I honestly don't see how anyone could get shamed by this. That is some pretty incredible mental gymnastics. Women still don't do meat and potatoes type of wor…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/13 10:58 AM
1

So to get the best for the job, you accept a high unemployment rate which costs a great amount of money. This isn't good for the economy at all. Ah, you found one of the few countries in the first world with a negative birth/death ratio. I guess I have to change my view! Oh wait, I already named Germany before. Side note: Japan has very few women in the government which kinda goes against the argumentation in the original post. Maybe we have to face the fact that a large number of women never re…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 09:08 PM
1

At least they got one thing right. Most other overpopulated countries where there aren't enough jobs for people, or enough jobs which provide sufficient income for a family (in the Middle East, Indonesia, Africa, north of South America) have very few, if at all, women in the government. But they love marriage and hate divorce there though.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 08:00 PM
1

Those are two different issues. Immigrants are not necessarily needed to make up for little population growth. The Chinese got it right: due to a decrease in birth rates economies can stay functioning. Overpopulation leads to poverty, corruption, crime and more overpopulation. But yeah, too bad mostly less intelligent people are set on breeding...
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 04:56 PM
1

Even if you're right and breeding until wars break out is the best option, there's no strength in numbers anymore like there was in tribal wars: only in technology. So the countries with the healthiest economies and the biggest guns are going to win this hypothetical war. Overpopulation in your region will only create civil unrest, making you a loser on world scale. Look at Egypt or other Middle Eastern overpopulated countries. You want to end like that?
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 04:33 PM
1

What if noone is capable or willing to do the jobs that are available? What strange kind of fantasy is that? Unemployment is what costs money. The US has 13.66 births vs 8.39 deaths per 1000., the UK 12.26 births vs 9.33 deaths and I couldn't find a country in Europe that had a negative rate, except Germany. Russia and a number of east European aren't first world countries. That map lists growth rate and not births/death rate. So first of all, you are still incorrect about the first world having…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 04:23 PM
3

The ability to stay hard, come again in 10 minutes and with such a load that he can come on her face again. I wouldn't even be mad, that's impressive.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 02:21 PM
1

Population of first world countries still grows. I don't see why we necessarily need growth. Thanks to technological improvements 1 person now can do the job which 10 years ago required 20 persons. Snowflakes? Uncontrolled multiplication is more resembling cancer if anything.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 02:05 PM
2

Not only did she suck him off but after he came on her face and in her mouth she blew him for probably ten minutes before she asked him to fuck her again. Then she swallowed a second time. What? How is this even possible?
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 01:04 PM
1

Sigh... You're confusing population growth with births. Population size can be stable or shrink while new children are born.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 08:08 AM
0

Wow, didn't expect you to get mad about it. The people are the ones reducing marriage and birthrates, for the sake of themselves. We live in a great and unique time where we don't need marriage and many children anymore. We now have the freedom to focus on other ways of improving our society instead of just passing on our genes. Which is a good thing because endless population growth is a dead end anyway.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 10:19 AM
-4

Population can't grow forever. We are already using more resources than the earth can provide. If you had children and then divorced, you already made the mistake of marrying. Less productivity with less stay at home moms?
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 09:52 AM
9

What's wrong with less marriage?
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 09:41 AM
-1

I'd say it provides a very telling and harsh reflection of gender relations. Alcohol is one of the risk factors, but almost every author reporting these statistics mentions gender inequality or men's attitudes towards women as another important cause: "Our Russia-US comparison appears to substantiate the multi-factor macro-models of social disorganization, normative violence and gender inequality emerging in the field." * "As late as the end of the 19th century, the Russian wedding custom of pas…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 01:13 PM
0

I did reply: OP remarks Russia has a great red pill culture and I reply saying gender relations in Russia are shit while providing the most brutal statistics I could find.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 10:31 AM
0

Because Russia has seemingly much to learn about healthy male-female relationships. I wouldn't look at this culture and think: "Hmm, we should be more like them."
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 09:55 AM
0

The statistics are high in comparison to other developed countries. From the article: "These figures, which were widely reported in the Russian press (Adamushkina,1995; Babakian, 1995; Goncharenko, 1994; Voloshina, 1995), are shocking in comparison to the rates of domestic violence fatalities and injuries in other developed countries (UN, 1995,1996)." I will provide the sources id you want. It's a bit late here now. Why is it so hard to accept that Russia is just a shit hole for women?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 09:54 PM
-3

It's not unconfirmed, she used a statistics with references. These references are in accordance with other sources which are named in the Amnesty International report I posted. The 14,000 statistic was reported by the Russian government: "In its fifth periodic report to CEDAW, the Russian Government stated that 14,000 women die each year at the hands of their partner or a family member." I guess the Russian Interior Ministry who has data on this subject would be a good source. But everyone's a f…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 03:28 PM
-6

I used the statistic of murder because surveys and even using police or medical reports have indeed lots of possible biases, especially in Russia. You are right, but this is just about Russia and not about domestic abuse globally. Russia is really bad even compared to countries of similar wealth.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 12:54 PM
-5

The Russian government and the many other sources they cite, which are all in agreement, can hardly all be suspected of being feminist. You're hamstering against scientific data.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 11:59 AM
9

If companies were craving for female employees like men crave female attention, I wouldn't be surprised if this attitude became reality.
/r/RedPillWomen02/08/13 11:42 AM
-6

That's the beauty of science. If you publish in a good peer-reviewed journal it doesn't matter what your views are, all that matters is argumentation and reproducibility. The number 12,000-14,000 is in accordance with a report from the Russian government. See this report by Amnesty International..
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 11:17 AM
-6

In Russia, the incidence of women who die from injuries inflicted by their intimate partners per capita (12,000-14,000 per year) is around 10 times higher than that in the US. source According to the evidence given by the interviewed men and women, wives have used force on their husbands a good deal rarer compared with husbands’ rough treatment of their wives, and the consequences of such assaults have been incomparably smaller. source No wonder there's Russian mail-order brides.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 09:53 AM
-8

I'm not sure Russia is the place to look for healthy male-female interaction.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 08:26 AM
0

It seems like he's encouraging feminists to aim for better goals.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/13 06:29 PM
2

New guys really didn't want to lose from a girl. They behaved recklessly incl no tapping or moving wildly which caused injuries and passing out. More experienced guys did held back because they were more focused on training technique.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 07:08 AM
2

I knew some women doing BJJ who did quite well against men of equal weight and experience, usually in the lower levels when small differences in skill help a lot. They had a hard time finding a partner though. They either ended up with someone better at martial arts than they were or they stopped training.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 09:56 PM
2

Women are attracted to better men so there is selection pressure.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 12:32 PM
1

But he said they were successfull already in getting pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/13 09:51 PM
8

I think generalization isn't necessarily wrong if done with care. After all, the general preferences of women is what the red pill is about.
/r/RedPillWomen29/07/13 06:51 PM
20

Still I notice very dumb or bitchy women somehow manage to find relationships. Usually due to their men complaining or joking about their stupidity or bitchyness to me. I don't understand men's choice of partners very well.
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/13 10:03 PM
1

"Women are dumb, never achieve anything." "Ok, I'll study then and pursue a career." "Go back to the kitchen, you feminazi!"
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 07:24 PM
1

I once did a literature search to find out if gender indeed plays a part in hamstering. Keywords I used were "self-justification", "post-hoc rationalization", "moral hypocrisy" and "moral disengagement". A number of studies found no significant effect of gender, while some actually suggested that men were the bigger hamsters: Kray & Hasehunn (2012) "Across multiple contexts, men demonstrated a consistent pragmatism to their ethical reasoning. Remarkably, women's ethical reasoning was unaffected …
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter