TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chrisorwhatever Archive

View 12 posts and 56 comments by chrisorwhatever on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
159

Does not surprise me in the slightest. Since there are still some "medical recommendations" to have a piece of your son's penis lopped off.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:35 PM
18

so many guys think that? To be fair, I can't speak for every man, but I don't particularly like being touched without consent, except by accident.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:14 PM
42

what is the appropriate reaction to being smacked on the ass by a stranger? whatever you feel is appropriate, within reason. Anger and flirty are totally reasonable. is it sexual harassment? Yes.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:11 PM
3

surely they have to make misandry a hate crime too. I hope you don't believe that will happen! There's almost zero chance that they'll introduce anything to balance it out.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 08:02 AM
45

Of course, because she knows it'll work.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 04:54 PM
15

Fair point
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:40 PM
90

Are men going to be able to sue for condom stabbing or lying about being on the pill?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:54 PM
5

Some very angry people inside that link! Given the kind of vitriol they are posting there, best they are gone from here tbh.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 01:06 PM
0

Replace either crime with anything you like - the point is that you shouldn't promote one over the other, just because it's perceived as a lesser issue by many. (Or, indeed, promote either of them)
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:48 AM
-1

Murder is worse than petty theft, but we don't promote petty theft because of that. Actually a pretty good analogy!
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:53 AM
11

Fair points, well made. Guess I'm probably guilty of "misperception" as well
/r/MensRights16/04/22 08:34 PM
4

Yeah, but she was driving without a licence to begin with, banning her won't stop her doing it again.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:44 AM
39

Doesn't have a licence, gets banned from the roads. Like that'll make any difference whatsoever.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:47 PM
1

NGL I don't really watch TV, so not sure if it was a TV ad too - though it quite possibly will be.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 09:16 PM
6

Yes, quite odd that happened. Links appreciated though.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 09:08 PM
16

>Well it is directed at girls and women. Yes it would be better if it was to everyone but at least something I see your point, but the issue is that the ad "implied" unwanted touching only happens to women and girls. > It never said that it is not towards men. No it did not, but it also did not say it was.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 09:06 PM
4

So they've not given up Nope, and they probably won't. But still, one small victory at a time eh.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 02:56 PM
4

Misogyny is "banned" on social media, but it definitely still happens. Misogyny is not OK. But you are right about misandry, it is the issue which is allowed to go unchallenged and uncorrected. Misandry breeds more misogyny, which in turn breeds more misandry and just repeats the endless cycle.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 08:52 AM
59

It's the BBC. Fairly standard occurrence for them, to be honest.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:49 PM
32

Would you look at that, a brand new trolling account.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 02:20 PM
54

It's not considered sexual assault because women, generally, cannot be guilty of such offences against men. After all, every man on the planet is secretly a rapist just waiting for his opportunity. /s.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:57 AM
1

Figured I'd go look at some - the first review I was presented with states "The time is NOW for Men to be better, to do better, and to find proper mental help when they need it." That's all well and good. But men cannot get the mental help they need, when they need it, because all too often the support just isn't there.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 12:07 PM
6

Part of the problem is also the AAP pushing outdated and, largely, debunked benefits of circumcision to parents.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 05:50 PM
15

Yes, rape is (currently) for forced penetration, but that's the problem: by definition men cannot be raped by women, regardless of the circumstances - even in statutory rape situations. The definition of rape needs to be changed. Also I am struggling, somewhat, to see the point in your reply.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:34 AM
41

Agreed, the definition certainly needs to change. The potential sentence for rape is life imprisonment, whereas the max penalty for the above offence is about 3-8 years.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:30 AM
6

That judge needs to be removed from his position. Having a change of heart is not conducive to being a judge in such cases.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:40 AM
4

In fairness, it's the daily mail - possibly the shittest "newspaper" on earth.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 08:56 PM
8

Honestly I hope it is neutral, it's been mentioned that there would be a "sex and gender" clause instead of a misogyny clause. I'd be quite fine with that as it would likely offer men the same protections.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:48 PM
32

Indeed. And, thanks to the enduring narrative that men can't really be victims of such things, it's unlikely to change anytime soon
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:57 AM
126

Theoretically you have the right to go to HR and report sexual harassment in the workplace, or indeed the police if it was in public. In practice, fuck all you can do about it, unless you just want to get mocked.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:53 AM
14

Such a poorly written "article", but I have to say I'm not surprised with the BBC. Regardless, the prospect is quite concerning.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:58 PM
3

As a father myself, this story absolutely breaks my heart. I can't imagine what the dad must be going through/have gone through. How anyone can inflict such horrific injuries on a defenceless child - I will never understand.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 10:50 PM
166

I'm not convinced there is any point in wasting your effort trying to convince her that she is wrong, she doesn't seem like the type to be open to changing her views. Instead, focus on what you think is right, be that helping men, families or whoever you feel deserving of your time, effort and compassion.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 12:48 PM
5

He could have just been uncomfortable and not sure what to say
/r/MensRights05/10/21 08:40 AM
20

Typical daily mail reporting, poor quality and always a sensationalist spin. She should have just moved away rather than escalating a perceived "confrontation"
/r/MensRights05/10/21 08:38 AM
13

Going outside every day
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:06 PM
49

What are they going to do if we refuse to stay indoors?
/r/MensRights28/09/21 12:30 PM
82

The crazy thing is the number of people defending this practice with out of date "health" arguments, though a majority of doctors worldwide are against the practice outside of medical grounds.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:19 PM
29

That's pretty shit. I am struggling to feel bad for him though - never throw that kind of cash away on someone you don't even know.
/r/MGTOW26/05/21 11:47 PM
25

From the petition: " Evidence shows that women experiencing domestic abuse need access to women-only support." As far as I was aware, they already have this access - it is men who have limited access to men-only support, they have to use non-dedicated services.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/21 08:13 PM
8

In that photo, she doesn't look especially remorseful either.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:50 AM
3

Feminists can easily change the definition of rape to privilege women so only people with penises can legally rape, Pretty sure that's the case in the UK, the definition around rape involves penetration with a penis.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:25 AM
11

Don't feed the trolls 😉
/r/MensRights28/04/21 02:40 PM
1

I hope it actually happens that way. Don't hope too hard, I have little optimism myself. why not just refer to it as "profiling"? Because that term alone isn't powerful enough. Calling it racial profiling makes it more hard hitting to a wider audience.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 11:13 PM
4

Interesting article, made for a thought provoking read.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:48 PM
8

Yep, this is the world we live in rn.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 08:53 AM
3

"If the plaintiff’s lawsuit is dismissed, the ruling will be an important step toward making it safer for women to report." Or simply make it even easier to make false accusations in the future.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 12:02 PM
2

Careful, the truth might get out!
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:09 PM
17

So basically "I can't do this, make it easier for me". Seems at odds with "anything men can do, women can do better"
/r/MGTOW14/03/21 06:59 PM
3

So, a slight reference to the fact that more men than women are dying from COVID. Then goes on to say that women are suffering the most (paraphrasing)?
/r/MGTOW22/01/21 01:52 PM
1

Fairly pointless post tbh. This isn't just a place to rant. Whilst there are some posts that just anti-women or anti-feminism there are a huge number of valid concerns and valid posts within this sub.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 10:56 PM
3

His life ruined by some lying bitch. Willing to bet that she gets fuck all punishment too.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 10:46 PM
6

Exactly
/r/MensRights24/08/20 09:28 AM
3

I think you have entirely misinterpreted this sub.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 10:12 PM
7

I am, sadly, becoming less and less surprised by hearing about this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:36 PM
34

Err, wtf?
/r/MensRights24/01/20 11:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter