TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

misterdoctorproff Archive

View 21 posts and 523 comments by misterdoctorproff on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
188

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:56 AM
52

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:35 PM
30

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:16 AM
28

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:33 AM
28

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:36 AM
19

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights13/10/13 02:16 AM
16

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:36 AM
12

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights20/12/12 02:27 AM
11

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights25/06/11 07:12 PM
11

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:39 PM
10

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights26/06/11 02:50 AM
8

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights16/01/14 06:27 PM
6

Questionsmisterdoctorproff/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:10 AM
6

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:04 AM
4

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:54 AM
4

Questionsmisterdoctorproff/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:06 AM
1

Generalmisterdoctorproff/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:50 PM
1

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights13/08/11 05:38 AM
0

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights03/07/16 11:22 PM
0

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:27 PM
0

misterdoctorproff/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:50 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

She's getting praise on her facebook because of both selection bias and the fact that what she did was swept under the rug by an extremely manipulative media. Many people probably just don't know and right leaning media is too unfocused and discombobulated to make this a huge story. For the sake of suicidal people who come to this subreddit, I would caution about taking such a defeatist attitude and not let selection bias of progressive leftists currently in their death throes paint your picture…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:02 AM
7

I'm still here. Please no service. I'm still frightened by how close I came. Won't get into ddetails. I'll be fine though. I was wrong. I was wrong. Without us those boys who I talked about have no one. I'd be betraying them. I need to get things sorted out, so I won't be coming on here for awhile. This subreddit is the greatest, thank you everyone for stopping me.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 03:29 AM
2

When I say that I'm done and I can't live in this world, I wasn't joking or being hyperbolic. I really want to be free.. This will be my last comment
/r/MensRights14/07/16 09:15 AM
1

So what do we do? Give up?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:36 AM
2

that there are myriad social problems affecting all of us that stem from either acceptance of male disposability or active anti-male hostility, and that feminism has for decades been a driving force behind making these problems far, far worse than they would have been. Paul Elam said at ICMI 2016 that feminism is the result of the acceptance of male disposability and anti-male hostility, which stem from gynocentrism. Sometimes it all just feels so hopeless. The only way that the MRM can ever suc…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:11 AM
6

She writes that Hannah Rosin's "The End of Men" is evidence of patriarchy cumbling, but it's nothing of the sort. It's just a misandrist screed whose narrative completely falls apart when taking into account that the vast majority of jobs that concern the most basic infrastructure we all take for granted, from sewage systems/irrigation, construction, oil refinery, air traffic etc., are composed mostly of men. Dirty, dangerous work that would destroy any modern society were it halted for just a s…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 12:57 AM
1

Disgusting subhuman filth.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 12:17 AM
1

I certainly hope that it doesn't mean that most men get urges to rape every women they see. They don't of course. Like I said, Dennis Prager is a complete fool. He's using Islam's treatment of women as an argument that men are naturally predatory and that morals here in the West stop that predation, completely ignoring that in Muslim countries men are taught from birth specifically that women are worth half they are and that they must be covered as their only worth is sexual. Nothing at all natu…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:38 AM
2

America spends more money on healthcare than Canada because of overreaching government regulation, abuse of tort law, cartelization of the healthcare provider industry, and the requirement of insurance for routine non-catastrophic care. Areas of the industry that don't face (most) of these issues and that most insurance doesn't cover, like LASIK or PRK, have been seeing a consistent drop in prices or price stability at the very least since they were introduced. The problem is much more complicat…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:16 AM
2

Most people would either not care and dismiss it as "not all feminists" or would actually agree with these Facebook pages. You underestimate how pervasive these attitudes are. If they weren't, MRAs wouldn't be a thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 10:37 AM
1

Now that the conference has passed, can you really say I was wrong? Well, I was wrong about one thing, the media didn't even acknowledge it, let alone attack it. I had no idea it was even happening until yesterday. No videos, tweets, no inclination of what went on to non-attendees whatsoever.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:45 AM
4

Dennis Prager is a fucking idiot and so are you for believing his article. Men are NOT sexual predators by nature just because they have a higer sex drive and there is NOTHING deficient or evil about male sexuality which is the obvious implication. Men are raped at approximately the same rate as women, but forced envelopment of a man by a woman is deliberately not counted as rape, as the researcher who discovered this, Mary Koss, said it was just "unwanted contact."
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:24 AM
2

You are wrong. Women are fully human and capable of love and of rejecting hatred. I'm confused as to why you stated this, as I thought I already made that clear. Perhaps you aren't a native English speaker? What I meant by the portion you quoted was that I would not experience love ever again because it is the path I have chosen, not that women are incapable of it.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 05:12 AM
2

I'm not new to this. I've been aware since around 2004. I've just come to accept reality. Consider: Feminism as it exists is simply the logical end result of gynocentrism and female hypergamy. Addressing it alone and achieving small victories in court does very little. Soon you will come up against the very nature of humanity, that which you must change in order to truly achieve anything significant. Comparatively few people are aware of what an MRA even is, but when and if they do, it'll be hel…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:08 PM
1

Can you address at all what I said? Contrary to what you believe, I am open to having my mind changed. The viciousness I just outlined however seems to be undeniable. I didn't even touch on entitlement, although the two are somewhat linked.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 10:39 PM
1

lol fuck Red pill too. I'm basing my opinion on what women say; the very words coming out of their mouths and nothing else. "Men are pigs" "Typical man" "women need a man like a fish needs a bicycle" "boys are stupid throw rocks at them" the list goes on and on. Look at any sitcom, talkshow, or hell, just happen to catch some random girl talk. 99% of the awful things they say about men would never ever be tolerated if the situation were reversed. I've never heard men talk about women like they d…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 08:36 PM
2

Nobody asked you
/r/MensRights04/07/16 08:28 PM
0

Yeah, the last one was real successful (Sarcasm) It'll blow over like the last one with people and the media labeling it as a meeting of a bunch of patriarchal misogynists. Don't you realize how truly corrupt and degenerate the state of affairs is? Trying to help infant boys keep their own flesh means you hate women. Trying to talk about how men are 80% of suicides and 90% of workplace deaths and what can be done to address it means you really hate women. Equal rights is sexist. Equal compassion…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 08:01 AM
1

None of this even matters. Men will never change. Women will never change, regardless of how many men get "fed up" with them. To them it'll just be more proof that men are pigs/evil/stupid. That's all 99% of women will ever view men as.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:34 AM
1

If I were concern trolling I would be chastising you for what you say or how you say it. I say none of that here; it's completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 06:33 AM
4

Maybe you're right and maybe I'm too negative. I'm just so burned out. I'm sick of living in a feminist police state where a huge number of women buy into toxic misandry, possibly the root cause of many problems here in the Western world. Some would call me a hypocrite and misogynist for saying most women loathe men, but that's simply the feeling I get based on what I hear them say.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:05 AM
1

Please explain why what I said is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 01:03 AM
2

The most heavily upvoted users here seem to wholeheartedly agree with me. The sentiment of "society doesn't recognize mens' issues" is repeated constantly and is heavily upvoted. I simply state what I see, and what I see is zero progress from a position of equal rights against a society that, despite most people's stated intent, is extremely against any notion of equality.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 01:01 AM
2

Correct.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 12:46 AM
2

I'm not just talking about Reddit, I'm talking about the men's rights movement in general.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 11:54 PM
1

Everything I said I believe 100%. Try to convince me otherwise. If I were a troll I would have said men really are the bad guys and have all the privilege, but I at least agree with the fundamental ideas of men's rights. Can you even tell me what progress you have made?
/r/MensRights03/07/16 11:41 PM
2

Anytime some push is made to eliminate oppression of women, it's fought by the more militant MRAs aligned with antifeminism. This is wholly and objectively untrue. Besides, being an antifeminist is a moral obligation because feminism is a hate movement. "I'm an antifeminist before I am an MRA." -Karen Straughn Open a unisex DV shelter in your city, or a homeless shelter (most homeless are men). None of these things requires any belief that men are more oppressed than women, or vice versa. If you…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:58 PM
1

It's going to take a true political and educational revolution for us to stop all of this and no, I'm not talking about fucking left or right politics, but a genuine scientific approach, but it's going to take people with some major balls to try and take this all on. Don't hold your breath. Society seems to have an utter lack of self awareness when it comes to these issues. I don't see the situation being resolved at all until the consequences for this lack of self awareness become so severe tha…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:28 AM
1

I guarantee none of these "blue collar non feminists" are well adjusted. When men denigrate their gender, they denigrate themselves as individuals. This lack of self esteem is ironically not at all attractive to women. I would wager that these guys in your class had depression/anxiety and very likely low testosterone, which isn't surprising considering the hostile environment for males that is education at all levels.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 01:31 AM
5

Honestly I think there's no better fate for people like that.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:35 PM
1

Well it relates to your comment in that: These (mostly male) authority figures you rightfully point to I was talking about the same people you were talking about. Your right nothing ever good has come out of mob rule, but nothing good comes out of concentrated power either, as we see today. If you don't care about the 99.9% of men who make up the "proletariat", then you ironically become that which you lambasted in your first comment.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:48 AM
1

Honestly, there's no fucking way the West can avoid a Rome-like scenario in the future. These (mostly male) authority figures you rightfully point to shouldn't get too comfortable, as members of the entire apparatus will become hunted like animals. I'm not excusing the violence resulting from a collapse, but well, the two usually come packaged together. The question is will the proletariat man's anger be realized and the various truths discussed on this subreddit be finally known? It's a shame i…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 01:53 AM
1

2.) Helps to create a separate legal category for large numbers of men whose lives can be systematically destroyed, thus unable to fend off an oppressive, corrupt government. They can stem the tide efficiently but not indefinitely, and once the bubble bursts their just dessert will be all the more painful for them. I foresee extreme violence in the future.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 01:43 AM
3

Some of the responses in that subreddit are good, but one heavily upvoted comment states: This post isn't shitting on men, it's critiquing the societal pressures that are conducive to these types of experiences. While the post in question contains: Men have no idea what it takes to be a woman. To grin and bear it and persevere. The constant state of war, navigating the relentless obstacle course of testosterone and misogyny, where they think we are property to be owned and plowed. But we’re not.…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:11 AM
4

...but I suspect most never will. It makes me sad knowing that half the human race are basically sociopaths in their dealings with me, but fine to eachother. It's fine. It's not some inherent defect in women. Yeah you need to breathe deeper before you type because inconsistencies aside, saying that women are and forever will be sociopaths, and even worse, believing it, is neither conducive to the rights of men and boys nor is it good at all for your mental health. There are indeed women like Kar…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:49 AM
0

Being nice makes us look sympathetic. Being Paul makes them look sympathetic. Being nice did nothing for the MRM for a hundred years. Paul's tactics exploded it in around less than 10 years. The "women are wonderful" effect is not an absolute end-all-be-all rule immune to subtle context.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:46 AM
0

Yeah, sometimes this subreddit goes a little too far. Or maybe it was just hyperbole. It actually makes perfect sense that many cucks would also be male feminists considering the shared trait of self hatred. People shouldn't let the lifestyles of a few cucks bother them. Selection bias and all.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:40 AM
0

The study, despite it's incredibly sad conclusion that women are indeed sexist, does not control for or elaborate on how much if this is biological, which is what I was emphasizing.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:14 AM
0

Listen, when I made my comment I was in a very bad place mentally. I made a judgment about you as I became consumed in anger and hatred. I sincerely apologize, and didn't mean any of it. One thing, you don't need to put down women in order to love men. You can love both, as both are capable of great things, and both have the potential to be equally toxic. It is true that toxic women tend toward emotional abuse whereas toxic men would tend toward physical abuse, but both are a minority. Even thou…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:08 PM
1

I was pretty burnt out when I made my comment, so I was irrationally feeling rather hopeless and making assumptions on the biology of men and women. In my anger, I was searching for any and all validations of my feeling, or rather my state of stubbornly "knowing", that women were uncaring, dismissive and contemptuous towards men, even downright hateful, when in reality it was I who was consumed by hatred. I was wrong. Answer me this, though: If men are disposable i.e. easily replaceable as males…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:06 AM
0

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:48 AM
-2

That's just acquiescing to gynocentrism. It defeats the entire purpose of men's rights. It will accomplish nothing in the long term. You'll end up right back where you started. How do you plan on fixing an issue that simply doesn't affect women? You can't. Here's a sad truth: you can never establish compassion or empathy for men and boys. The vast majority of women will always view men as beneath them, as inferior, as disposable utilities, if not with outright hatred, and men will go along with …
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:42 PM
4

Utter filth is all that comes to mind.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:27 PM
1

I have had experience with counseling. Not marriage counseling, but psychotherapy, which is more general but nonetheless applicable. Many social workers just blame the man for everything, which may or may not have been the case with your friends. They may have just had incompatible mates. In any case, you would need to do research before seeing one. The right psychotherapist/social worker can make all the difference. You would need to get a handle on how serious your situation is before going at…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:32 AM
2

This was so incredibly disgusting and sexist. The entire premise relies on mental gymnastics and revisionism. Each day my disdain for feminism is reaffirmed.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:48 AM
5

The comments on that thread make my blood boil. Makes me want to track those people down and slap them (not that I actually would). Hey assholes, nobody gets to have an opinion on somebody else's health and body and how they feel about them, especially regarding an irreversible procedure. Calling them selfish is extremely entitled; end of moral analysis.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 08:45 AM
4

First of all you should immediately tell your wife and her idiot friends that tubal litigation is, just like a vasectomy, a minor outpatient procedure, so the guilt tripping was doubly unnecessary because she was lied to. It wouldn't have mattered if either of you got or didn't get whatever procedure from an "invasive" standpoint. I also agree with /u/DavidByron2 that you should immediately discuss the gossip with her, as that seems to be a far more pressing issue. Perhaps seek counseling.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 08:39 AM
-1

The concept of empathy is much more than understanding. A white Nebraskan may not truly understand the struggle of young black men in Detroit, but if they are moral they can at least see the inherent disadvantages of being raised in such an environment. It's not a perfect comparison, because a white Nebraskan may not have ever met someone from Detroit, making genuine empathy understandably somewhat more difficult, but one never having had contact with the other gender would be, in addition to ve…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:39 AM
1

An in-group bias still does not render women "biologically incapable" (their words) of empathizing to at least some extent with men.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:18 PM
1

There are certain species of rodents in which a small ratio of males to females happen naturally; why is this not so for humans? The reason you stated is one, as humans have pair bonding brains that result in the concept of love, not just mating, and hence are naturally averse to the idea of someone they love having sex with someone else. Another reason is genetic diversity. Limiting the gene pool in such a manner is always a bad idea and would naturally result in an increase of genetic diseases…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:48 AM
1

Late reply, yes, but I'm genuinely curious about what you think. If you run in circles where most people would find it otherwise... it sounds like you might be involved with some pretty shitty people. I'm not talking about small groups of people you and I are familiar with. I'm talking about the zeitgeist. Good for you, most that I know wouldn't agree with her behavior either. Many would indeed joke about it however, something they would never, ever do if the situation were reversed. Do you real…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:08 AM
0

As much as this guy's smug pretentiousness puts me off, I think he may have a point concerning the MRM "victories." The MRM is a behemoth in scope and complexity compared to GG and as such moves at a much much slower, more random pace. Let's face reality: the MRM isn't even close to a behemoth in any sense of the word. Just look at the numbers: TRP has more subscribers than /r/MensRights despite the latter being a subreddit for 5 years longer. That place isn't exactly what you would call mainstr…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:35 AM
4

Ricky Gervais. Can't find the video either...
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:59 AM
5

Imagine if an MRA went around posting shit like that about women. If a Return of Kings opinion piece can elicit outrage toward men's rights despite RoK being anti-MRA then I would imagine there would be something akin to a manhunt.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:04 AM
7

I needed this. Even in the face of an ideology drilling into their heads from birth that men and masculinity are toxic, dangerous and inferior, more women and girls aren't buying it, even if it's just a minority. Good to see.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:31 AM
9

It's no surprise it's failing miserably at its stated goals, but I really can't wait until it utterly collapses in the worst way possible.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:18 AM
5

Her actions are absolutely not socially acceptable. If she were a man, then they wouldn't be. People ignore and joke about male on female abuse all the time. Maybe on 4chan, but anywhere else? Do you really believe that? Try to imagine if this facebook post was written by a man to his wife/girlfriend. Seriously, there is absolutely no symmetry in this regard. It's a blatant double standard and there's no way around it. You really believe that women can't empathize with males? I said the vast maj…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:10 AM
5

This woman's actions are indeed socially acceptable, whereas violent and abusive men aren't, so yes, I believe most people would just write off her behavior or even condone it. An entire audience of a randomized sample of women laughed when Sharon Osborne joked about a man having his penis cut off for wanting a divorce. Face it, the vast majority of women in the West genuinely believe men are beneath them. Not only do they not have any empathy for men and boys, but their pain is a source of humo…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:53 AM
-1

Maybe I am wrong, but I truly believe in the depths of my heart that gynocentrism and male disposablity and the resulting misandry are too ingrained in the human psyche to change, much unlike racism which can be overcome. I don't think there's any hope left for me; I likely won't be convinced otherwise and I may or may not still be alive in a year, but maybe you can prove me wrong and get enough people to truly see and understand mens' and boys' issues. I wish you, /r/mensrights and the mrm the …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:18 PM
-4

More people talking about this shit equates to more people feeling comfortable talking about it off the internet. An admirable, yet forever small and token group that will always be marginalized by the mainstream. which anyone would tell you is currently almost surely social and career suicide. And so it shall continue to be. Funny thing, collectivists afraid of "social and career suicide" are the least likely people to ever change anything. Yet, here you are complaining on reddit. I'm actually …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:30 PM
0

Easy. Look up the "women are wonderful" effect. Most men and nearly all women have a natural bias favoring women. There is no symmetry in this regard. It evolved over millions of years due to females being the limiting factor in reproduction. People who don't subscribe to it simply have a larger amount of empathy than is normal, and only because of this are capable of understanding the nature of male disposablity and the resulting general apathy for mens' and boys' issues. Face it, we're an anom…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:07 PM
-8

I don't go to parties. I have plenty of time to waste. Your optimism is somewhat touching, but still naive and thus ultimately sad. You need to accept that there are things you truly cannot change. The rotation of the Earth, the speed of light, and the nature of humans. People like us who even recognize that misandry even exists will always be an anomaly. No matter how hard you try or what you do, it will fail. You'll just be called a misogynist, even though the data is rock solid and incontrove…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:59 PM
-27

Misandry is a biological norm and will never change short of mass genocide and genetic engineering. This subreddit is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:45 PM
1

By different regulations, you mean complete control. Chernobyl was, like everything, owned by the Soviet government. Given this total oversight, or maximum regulatory power, the USSR should have at least excelled in safety and the environment even if they failed at everything else. They didn't, though, so what gives? We've got 100 nuclear power plants in the United States running non-stop, and not a single death from them since the 1960s. Indeed they are regulated by the NRC, but ultimately most…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:58 PM
1

The point was the worst nuclear accident in history happened under government watch. I'm not talking about nuclear power in general. So considering the sacrosanct and perfect government isn't immune to disaster, much like those greedy and wasteful corporations, I would imagine that even more oil would spill if the government did own more tankers and pipelines.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:04 AM
3

How far would that trust extend if you understood history? Here's a small list of the amazing environmental feats of government: "...disappearance of the Aral and Caspian Seas, due to massive and unchecked pollution, over cutting of trees, and consequent desertification. Then there is Chernobyl, which caused hundreds, if not thousands of deaths. For ferry boats in the Volga River, it is forbidden to smoke cigarettes. This is not for intrusive paternalistic health reasons as in the west, but beca…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:31 AM
2

we can change government but you cant destroy private business. and we know what is the god of private business. You're pretty fucking naive. Your vote is worthless, they just do what they want, but a private business must have an inflow of capital from customers. People stop shopping there and the business does indeed get destroyed.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:18 AM
-3

It was independent corporations that exploded Chernobyl, fucked hundreds of Russian lakes with pollution that still exists to this day, and consumes the most fossil fuel by orders of magnitude. Oh no it wasn't. It was the USSR and is the US military, respectively.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:16 AM
3

Relationships wherein one has an upper hand over the other should only exist among masters and their slaves. It's really disgusting when I read and see shit like that everywhere concerning romance, pretty much exclusively of women having the "upper hand" over their men. Such relationships are all doomed to failure and misery, unless you're into BDSM.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:07 AM
1

It's not just selection bias or anecdotes. The legal inequalities exist for all men everywhere in the West. They exist whether or not you've ever been arrested. There's general societal attitudes as well, and they're just that; general. You can't really avoid them unless you move to some place where they're different. For most people that's pretty far away. this forum is no different from a "product X problem page" and if you cant understand and appreciate the context it will just bum you out. I…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:15 PM
1

I ultimately don't care about what men and women in the various subreddits feel, I care about objective reality, so what you said doesn't really apply to what I said. Maybe I didn't convey my thoughts very well... They did make me think, I'll admit. What I want to know is how the majority of women, exceptions notwithstanding, feel about men. I'm not just talking about feminism. It would be truly, truly sad if a large part of mens' issues exist because the majority of women just genuinely hate th…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:03 PM
1

Who in their right mind would? Every single person in their right mind would. The lone man with his arms crossed among a crowd of people saluting Hitler was the only one there in his right mind, up to and after he was likely sent to a death camp. It was everyone else not in their right mind. Cowardice in order to appease a filthy collective, or not committing "social suicide" as you call it, is just that: cowardice, and it is no excuse. A mark of the true Untermensch, as Nietzsche would have sai…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:15 AM
25

Bonobos aren't sexually violent, but they are indeed violent, contrary to earlier theiories. It's actually quite amazing looking into it. Bonobos, just like Chimps, will invade and hunt other primate tribes, but you have all these fucking idiots, scientists and otherwise, that believe they are role models for humans because they are matriarchal and "non-violent" which turned out to be bullshit. Female Bonobos are inherently violent, keeping males from food by attacking and biting off their finge…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:42 AM
1

Name one society that ever didn't prioritize the safety and protection of women over mens. I don't know if we just misunderstood each other or if I wasn't clear, but I'm not disputing that. The OP said that masculinity is deficient by nature of men being "fucked up by evolution" and that this is the cause of "this problem" we are having, which I assume he/she means the state of men and boys in the West. The entire world is not the West, however. Things are indeed different elsewhere, and while t…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:42 PM
1

Holy Anglocentric jingoism, Batman. the UK wants a fair game. Sure, we'll just take your word on it that the UK plays a "fair game" while the US doesn't, even though feminism seems to fuck things up equally in both countries. Baseball has an umpire too, genius.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:34 AM
-1

You keep saying this is cross-cultural but provide no evidence. The study sourced is from the U.S. When taking a look at other cultures, it's clear this attitude is heavily influenced, perhaps solely influenced, by Victorian morality that spread throughout the West as a consequence of the British Empire and globalization. In other cultures it's sometimes so incredibly bad in the opposite direction. For example, men in the Middle East can essentially rape any woman of their choosing consequence f…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:23 AM
54

This article was vomit inducing. That professor motherfucker who created his own reality was actually pretty funny. "It is assumed women must cater to mens' needs and desires." What fantasy realm is this? Has this dude ever been on a date? Hell, even watched one episode of any sitcom? Then there's the whole rape being normalized narrative and false rape accusations just don't happen line. Does this mean To Kill A Mockingbird is MRA shitlord propaganda?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:57 AM
1

How do you know they were all christians? Uh, they were all chanting the Hail Mary? Maybe 0.1% weren't Christians, but it's obvious nearly all of them were.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:39 AM
1

You fail to see that the Catholics have been just as if not more oppressive in their history than the Muslims. This is so incredibly wrong that it makes me naseous. The entirety of Islam's history has been dominated by violent conquest. It was invading Europe from the south and East for hundreds of years. By contrast, the Crusades were much shorter, and were also a response to the aforementioned Muslim invasions. Oh, and the Ottomans were quite violent and regressive, constantly invading Eastern…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:33 AM
-3

The majority of MRAs do, in fact, try to bring attention to boys who are raped. MRAs are the only ones who actually notice them.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:02 AM
1

It is the responsibility of both parties to establish mutual consent with each other before sex, drunk or not.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:53 AM
5

Mannen zijn de eeuwige jood.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:21 PM
2

They say " a fish can't see the water it swims in." In order for this to be seen as a joke, the underlying context of why it is seen as a joke is important to understand. Ultimately, the context is that the sentiment is taken at least somewhat seriously, which is why although people within the culture excuse it as a joke, they cannot see it through the lens of a culture where it wouldn't simply wouldn't make sense at all as even a joke because there is no underlying context as to why it would be…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:53 PM
7

The comments are infuriatingly stupid. They're trying to hand wave this behavior away by saying "it's just common courtesy for people to help with her bags" but Gillian Anderson specifically bemoaned that men did not help her, ironically because they probably thought she was a strong, independent woman who doesn't need a man's help. She is attempting to appeal to male gender roles, hence this viewpoint is entitled. There's no other way around that, and the commenters' double standards are obviou…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:58 PM
2

Yeah, just loud voices making it seem they have control of everyone's opinions, yet they disable their comments and ratings on their videos lol.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:17 PM
1

Sure they have no problem finding guys, but if all men are scum to them then they won't want to reproduce is my point. This seems to hold true considering their birth rates are much lower than their counterparts. I do agree that society has a very high acceptance of misandry, I'm not underestimating that, so neither am I suggesting this is a problem that will take care of itself. However, with feminism imploding under its own dishonesty, like I said, there may yet be a light at the end of the tu…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:09 PM
4

The disdain for male heterosexuality is fairly recent, something that doesn't exist in many cultures and never existed in the West before feminism. Times change though, and with feminism imploding there may yet be a light at the end of the tunnel, especially considering misandrist women who hate male sexuality logically won't reproduce.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:21 PM
3

Could sending signals be interpreted as making a move? I think that's subjective.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:17 PM
1

Biologically, this is an extreme oversimplification and untrue in most viewpoints. If it were true, sex would be impossible without rape and the species would be in extreme danger of extinction.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:07 PM
1

Yep. History shows that lack of women affects men's mind. There is the wild west. Men were basically out of control. When women moved in, life changed over night. When your second sentence immediately starts with weasel words, that's when I know to disregard everything you say. How about something more logical and less blatantly sexist, like: "various interactions around the opposite sex influence the behavior of both genders" or "human interactions result in various patterns of behavior among i…
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:59 AM
1

bla bla bla association by historical guilt bla bla racial generalizations bla bla vague privilege accusations bla bla ignoring all context. Doesn't sound much like knowledge to me.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:01 AM
2

I don't need tainted (un)knowledge that seeks to fulfill a pre-contrived narrative, thanks.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 09:19 PM
1

Try telling a little boy it's okay because of history he had nothing to do with, you miserable piece of shit. Guilt by historical association is a fallacy, possibly even more fallacious than its parent.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 09:14 PM
2

People like you are the reason the world isn't as good as it could be. Maybe one day you'll realize that you are a racist piece of shit and change.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 09:10 PM
1

I suspect that the necessity of two working partners instead of one as it used to be is ironically a consequence of feminist actions to get more women into the workforce, as relative wealth and disposable income is less today than when there used to be only one income provider. Just a suspicion, I don't say I know it to be true, but it does make one think.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:57 PM
1

To the contrary, male and female sex crimes are viewed differently despite consistent small mindedness from both camps. Teenage girls are often just as hormonal as their male counterparts. I remember overhearing a group of girls back in high school about the various things they wanted their "hot" male teacher to do to them. If he had actually done any of those things, he would have been charged as a sex offender and his career would have been over, as is appropriate, regardless of how strong the…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:49 AM
9

It actually seems very likely, and unless you're willing to offer any evidence beyond your own armchair psychologist conjecture, I'll take it with anything else said on the internet: may be true, may be complete bs.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:52 AM
25

As someone with ADHD I can tell you that you can diagnose a 6-year-old with ADHD and that is is best to medicate early since that greatly increases the chance that the child will grow out of it. 1: It is nearly impossible to diagnose a 6 year old with ADHD. Over-diagnosis is a massive problem with this disorder. 2: Real ADHD is a lifelong condition that cannot just be "grown out of." Adults with the genuine condition still have it. If they end up "growing out" of it, they probably never had it i…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:36 AM
8

Most 6 year olds don't know what sex is period.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:28 AM
3

I don't want parents to be afraid to go to the state agencies that are supposed to be protecting our children when things like this happen, out of fear that their children are going to be charged Hopefully she now realizes that the only reason this happened to her child was because he was a male, and the only other children this could possibly happen to are also all males. Women seeing their male relatives and loved ones destroyed can be quite an asset to this movement.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:04 PM
0

Fuck Ireland.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:11 PM
5

I agree with most of this, it wouldn't make sense for you to attend a conference hosted by what you thought was a radical group, much less be on the panel. In Paul's defense though, the initial comment was a little vague, but at the same time I understand speaking times for the panel were generally limited and there was no speech writing compared with the speakers.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:49 PM
3

This shit is pure fucking evil. Imagine young boys who come across this and then feel like complete shit and become emotionally scarred for being told they are bad and defective. Can we please stop beating around the bush by saying these people are just misandrist or prejudiced or what have you. Evil is the only word truly fit for them, and they are our enemies in absolute terms.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:34 PM
3

Hey, that's 78% of women that potentially are not complete hypocrites.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:59 PM
3

From the comments: This needs context. If he's a regular MRA poster, the implicit point was probably that "women don't have it worse," not genuine sympathy. These people are complete fucking sociopaths. Any attention brought to normally invisible male victims is an attack on women (if they're an MRA). The worst, most despicable logic I've seen in a very long time. Humanity desperately needs a hostile alien invasion.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:56 AM
1

Iranians aren't Arab, and the fact that these murders of men and child soldiers are ignored by the misandric West doesn't change the fact that Islam is still deeply misogynistic.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:59 AM
3

We have to denounce them and divest ourselves of them. I'm so glad there are people denouncing people like you, who spread far more misinformation than Penn and Teller could ever hope to.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:34 PM
19

Wouldn't be so bad if people wouldn't flip their shit if the genders were reversed and this was mother's day. Equality. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:18 PM
1

Don't forget the DC naval academy guy, he was black
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:40 AM
5

You can't ban someone from a position and then complain that they're not facing the consequences of taking the position. What are you talking about? No one's complaining that more women aren't dying. The ideal number of deaths would be zero. The complaint is people using the term "male privilege" despite men being most seriously unprivileged in that particular realm (a very important realm indeed, as it deals not with pay but with life and death).
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:13 AM
1

Disingenuous. Of course women make up a small percent of those. Women were not allowed into combat roles until very recently, so even 3% actually seems high to me. You people can't be serious. Your reasoning is that women are excused from combat because they are considered to weak to fight, and that this is oppression equal to a man being hounded and sent against his will to face death. It is gynocentrism raised to the level of sociopathy.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:52 AM
1

Copy/ paste No the reasoning is that women are excused from combat because they are considered to weak to fight, and that this is oppression equal to a man being hounded and sent against his will to face death. It is gynocentrism raised to the level of sociopathy. It's like complaining children are oppressed by saying they aren't allowed to work. The point of the infographic wasn't to show that men are oppressed, it was to show that they most definitely aren't privileged. It's right at the fucki…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:51 AM
6

I can vouch for this. I'm cut and I thought I was sensitive before, but I've done some foreskin regeneration through stretching and the difference is like night and day, even though only some of the keratin is gone.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:10 PM
2

I would have liked to see a similar article, say, from a poverty-stricken redneck. It's interesting how poor redneck white trash are mocked at a level far greater than any ghetto black trash considering a very large number of American rednecks are descended from Irish and Scottish slaves brought to Barbados ("redlegs"). It's like the modern day equivalent of the age old English hatred of the Celts.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:44 PM
11

Man, these marketing people are funny, thinking consumers would be interested in the pointless conversation of annoying strangers.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:51 PM
3

One day, a man accused of a crime he is innocent of will have this happen to him, and when that day comes, everyone who celebrates will be as filthy as any rapist.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:59 PM
21

If a male doctor said a female patient had a loose pussy while she was anesthetized, he would be out of a job forever and every news station would foam at the mouth, regardless of how well he did the surgery.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:49 PM
7

Bro, I get it, you're pissed off because you feel persecuted, powerless, and stuck in an oppressive system that favors one group over the other. I never said that. I was specifically talking about feminists and the shit they do, one example being typhonblue's post where they are shown to hide male rape victims from statistics and how I don't care about generalizations if the generalizations are true, which you seem to be unable to understand.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:25 PM
5

You think all feminists are trying to hide the ugly truths about female-to-male persecution? I'm tired of this NAFALT nonsense. Hell, the entire "not all x does y" is meaningless. Classification is a cognitive human skill. It doesn't speak to deviants, so stop with this anti-generalization bullshit. It doesn't matter if not all feminists are trying to screw men, it doesn't even matter that most of them aren't. What matters is that those with power and influence have and still are, and the collec…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:56 PM
3

Ostructionism isn't even inherently bad. The system was designed to be slow and conflict inherent. Having a one party dictatorship able to pass laws with no opposition is dangerous however. Any filibuster and certain motions can be considered obstruction, and they most certainly did happen during Bush's tenure.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 07:20 PM
7

Both parties push heavy corporatism and obstructionism when the other's in power.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:00 PM
5

This isn't a place for political discussion, but I'll just say no one with a brain will take you seriously if you complain about right wing nuts and Fox News after saying "communism is freedom." That's poetic irony.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:36 AM
3

People who live in bubbles are often disgusted by reality, so in a twisted way, she's right.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:36 PM
2

Everyone should be aware that the push by corporations to have more women in programming and computer science is an effort to lower wages. There is no shortage of IT professionals and they're trying to oversaturate the market with cheap labor.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:32 PM
2

It does makes what you said highly selective though, considering even the covers of romance novels sexually objectify men, similar to womens' magazines. Most people rightfully don't have a problem with this though, making their outrage of big boobs in video games hypocritical in addition to thought controlling, the latter because this mindset requires extrapolating male sexual fantasies and equating them with low value judgments of women, which is highly mistaken.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:26 PM
1

Sure thing.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:06 AM
2

It's because they promise free things to minority groups, not because the GOP promises smaller taxes at the expense of education, science, art, and welfare (because everybody on welfare is cheating the system) This is a point of contention that you're unfairly representing. A belief in lower taxes could mean anything from improving the laffer curve so the state recieves more revenue for these things or simply a moralist and practical position in which, respectively, more wealth should be in the …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:24 PM
2

Gerrymandering has indeed worked to the Republicans favor, but only by about 10 seats in the House, which isn't enough to change the majority. Shady tactic of course, but not as conspiritory as paranoid leftists try to make it seem, especially since California is also heavily gerrymandered to Democratic favor.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:09 PM
2

There is historical context. They just choose to ignore it. The Mongol Invasions, Berber Conquests, Ottoman conquests. Asians were conquering lands and oppressing and killing natives long before white people. You could say white people learned from the best.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:04 AM
2

"Heteronormativity" is such a stupid fucking word.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:39 AM
-4

These people are fucking Nazis.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:37 AM
1

I see I've hit a nerve, as you've done nothing whatsoever to address what I've said. No, theism means that. Religion and theism are not the same. So no, you can't play such games. This is a meaningless technicality. We were talking about atheism and theism, so what's the point of bringing up non-theistic religion? It isn't an idea. It's a rejection of an idea. There is no such thing as an opinion one holds that cannot be an idea. This makes no sense. The only way to have no idea is to have no op…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:31 AM
1

No. You can list things done by atheists. Not done in the name of atheism. Are you being serious? Atheism means nothing more than you don't believe in a god. And? Religion means nothing more than believing in a god. I can play word games, too. There's nothing to be done, in the name of. This is such an incredibly stupid claim it boggles the mind. Any idea can have something done "in the name of." Yours is a tired old theist statement that never seems to do die, no matter how many times it's poin…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:51 PM
1

I'm Christian myself, but I do recognize several verses, particularly Exodus 21:7, that are misogynistic. Of course the Old Testament is a thoroughly Jewish book well over 2000 years old and only the most extreme take these ancient verses descriptive of the ancient Levant and apply them literally in modern times. Or at least wish to, as Exodus 21:7 deals with slavery which is obviously illegal.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:48 AM
2

It's not that they "get along just fine". It's that the things that one believes effect their actions in the real world. I can list pages of atrocities and anti-theist persecutions committed in the name of state atheism by the former Soviet Union and today by China and North Korea, but I'm not foolish enough to say the majority of atheists are like this and don't get along just fine. People who believe in irrational things about the world make irrational choices and decisions using that informat…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:36 AM
4

Wow dude your own post just went over your fucking head. A Jewish book written 2000 years ago is still relevant today in literal terms but something else 150 years ago is too old to be relevant. Damn, that's rich.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:30 AM
2

If certain religious individuals are filled with hate towards individuals who don't share their beliefs but seem to get along just fine, then turnabout is fair play and some atheists will also be anti-theist in response to religious people who get along just fine.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 06:11 PM
8

The woman in the video is using a very obvious and shameful tactic of mixing in facts, such as women's superior olfactory sense, with half supported assertions, factoids and assumed axioms with no corroborating sources in order to denigrate men. The last example is typical brain dead selectivity common among today's Western hildabeasts: completely ignoring the existence of sperm in order to realize their fantasy about women and uteruses being the sole creators of life. Pure intellectual masturba…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:43 AM
0

As Elam had to painfully spell it out on the article itself, said article fully meets the definition of Juvenalian satire.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:07 PM
2

Have you ever read Jonathan Swift?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:56 PM
1

The study you linked to seems to imply white women are getting premature wrinkles as a result of too much sun in a non European environment or, by my own extensions, tanning habits. I was prematurely assuming too much about your and the other commenter's mens rea because you weren't specific enough for my liking. I just recalled a comment on a video by an obviously well educated Asian man (/s) who said "lololo white girlz look old" and it seems I unfairly saw your comment in the same light as th…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:53 PM
9

If the MRM is going to be in the public eye (and, sure, it's welcome to keep doing its little thing—I don't particularly care), it should be as nothing more than a beacon of indecency, evidence of the pervasiveness of modern misogyny, and a reminder of how far we have to go. Preach! And dem uppity colored civil rights activists too back in the 60s; they were, how you say, "evidence of the pervasiveness of modern racism against whites."
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:40 PM
1

Way to prove the above commenter's point about being randomly accused of racism You made a statement that assigned inferiority to a race without any corroborating evidence and without specifying whether or not this inferior characteristic was inherent or arisen from behavior. That's about as non-random an accusation as you can get. just because someone a makes a comment regarding racial characteristics, doesn't make it a racist comment. Again, you never initially made clear whether or not said "…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:34 PM
1

Old post I know, but trying to fight racism with racism won't help anything. White women don't seem to age any faster than other women
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:57 PM
1

Old post I know, but trying to fight racism with racism won't help anything. White women don't seem to age any faster than other women.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:55 PM
4

Then I had a black woman and they were all pretty nice except the black guys wanna kick your ass I remember this part. There was always quite a bit of satisfaction involved when some racist hood rat asshole who probably went on about sex with white women couldn't handle seeing a white guy with a black girl. Clearly they couldn't see the hypocrisy either, not to mention their own obvious insecurity. I blame it on public schools. Most of the black guys I met while with her were secure enough to be…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 06:10 AM
14

"Yellow fever" is a racist term invented by jealous and bitter white women so this kind of bullshit has been around for a while.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:54 AM
0

We supposedly have free speech here in the UK, too. No you do not. As much as liberties in the US have waned, it is still not the totalitarian cesspool that is the United Kingdom. It is not even jingoistic for me to say so. You can't be imprisoned here for hurting someone's feelings and it would be extremely difficult for our government to institute an Internet filter.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:50 PM
4

No. This guy's info is publicly available with a Google search of his name and is posted on his own website
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:52 PM
5

You're kidding right? MRAs are held to the highest standard imaginable. Feminists in academe and lobbying committing human rights violations against men don't matter because "not all feminists are like that" but every 14 year old anonymous troll making a misogynist comment is a spokesperson for the entire men's rights movement even if they don't identify as an MRA or in many cases even a male. You're attempting to kowtow to their insatiable persecution hunting complex and are basically trying to…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:14 PM
6

These people are pure fucking evil.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:04 PM
2

I see the brigaders from againstmensrights are in full force. I'm so proud.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:51 PM
8

For one, there was the crop of posters that showed up on Alberta campuses over the summer that made a parody of a successful anti-rape campaign. While the message behind the parody posters was a valid one — that false claims of sexual assault can, and do, ruin men’s lives — the method was tactless. "Successful" anti-rape campaign? What are the numbers of men who went out to rape that changed their minds after seeing those posters? If the campaign was successful, than surely the mirror one by Men…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:45 PM
1

Apparently you just completely ignored the concept of male only draft I just pointed out. Regardless, career military personnel don't want to engage in combat. To paraphrase Bill Maher, they just think they're going paintballing on the weekends. The vast majority of individuals in the military never see combat. It's a way to make money from the state for standing around at a base.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:46 PM
-4

It's alright for people to call each other out. That is, in fact, exactly what I'm doing. If they want to point out how ridiculous "we" are being, then they have to not be ridiculous themselves.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:42 PM
4

That women are excluded from combat roles seems irrelevant given that combat is hardly a choice anyone engages in. Very unlike football. We're essentially one world war away from every country, even those without a draft, reinstating one and one only for men.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:33 PM
-1

This doesn't simply pertain to that thread, it pertains to the very concept of NAFALT and "visitors" to the sub in general which is why I thought it would make more sense to post a submission.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:28 PM
3

None of those statistics are contested.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:29 PM
0

Yeah, I was really confused for a second that something so dumb got upvoted so much on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:42 PM
3

I can't find any sources for feminists fighting for women in combat roles other than a few token groups. Good on those groups, but the vast majority seems to have remained completely silent.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:13 PM
2

MRAs tried your pussyfooted approach to dealing with psychopathic institutions and societies that give zero shits about men for 100 years. Surprise, it didn't work. Generating controversy is the greatest, perhaps only weapon this movement has.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:10 PM
2

I'm confused as to whether or not this is an S&M fetish page.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:25 PM
1

Russia isn't a Western country. The cold war is traditionally known to be between East and West. Moscow is further east than even Istanbul. Even so, the penalty for being gay in Russia? Prison at worst. Still not death.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:39 PM
0

Seriously? Just look at their countries. The evidence is overwhelming. Atheism is illegal in Indonesia. 80+% of Jordanians believe in death for apostasy and death for homosexuality. The numbers are the same or higher across the middle east. Eating during Ramadan in the UAE is illegal. Not to mention honor killings, which are an accepted part of their culture, and the oppression of religious minorities which is endemic and very culturally normal. You can bring up whatever red herring you want abo…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:40 AM
1

If we're going by the beliefs of the vast majority of muslims in the world, then Islam is indeed misogynistic.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:44 AM
12

The general consensus in law and society is that men cannot be vaginally raped.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 11:59 AM
147

Cowards.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:36 PM
23

This would be raping him all over again, except this time the rape lasts 18 years. And these people think they're on a moral high ground. *vomits profusely
/r/MensRights21/09/13 11:54 AM
20

What I find that doesn't go down well around here is the idea that a woman can be superficially traditionalist i.e. Have all the benefits but none of the responsibilities. If she were to, by her own choosing, wish to stay home and be protected and provided for, have her doors opened, etc. I wouldn't mind but if I happened to be in such a relationship I would ask in return for a big smile and a hot meal when I come home from work.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:07 AM
1

The way it's worded just seems very cold. It comes across as saying a relationship should be an "evaluation" in the same way one evaluates a piece of equipment every 6 months to make sure it's still working. Introspection into a relationship is important, but when treating with such a utilitarian bent means there is no love there.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:46 PM
6

Reinforcing the idea that men are utilities is a destructive mindset that has everything to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:25 PM
43

It's a perfect visual representation of collective mental illness. A misandrist scribe upvoted by 495 chauvinist women and white knights.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 12:14 PM
11

So it truly has become something awful...I'll show myself the door.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:08 AM
29

This isn't surprising at all; feminism is entirely based on neo-marxist pseudo intellectualism. Just replace "proletariat" with "women", "bourgeoise" with "men" and "capitalism" with "patriarchy." Everything falls into place.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:28 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/duplicates/1lwcqk/highly_biased_child_protective_services_interview/ The one you see there now is a resubmission.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:12 AM
3

The father eventually found out his 7 year old daughter is on Geodon, which is only approved for adults. She's essentially become a guinea pig.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:09 AM
34

If you watch the video, her full name is mentioned.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:49 AM
18

Many a concern troll has expressed dismay about forcing mens' rights issues out there full stop all at once. Now it's a problem with subtle exposure like this video?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:47 AM
24

The video is not directly related to feminism, anti-feminism, or mens' rights. Gary Trieste, the uploader and guy in the video, links to avoiceformen.com in the description. He also posts his story, which is decidedly mens' rights related.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:29 AM
5

Those aren't really gender roles, though.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:17 AM
5

Many people seem to be confused over "gender roles." To me, the term denotes an ostracization by society to men and women who don't conform to their "roles." Fighting against this mindset doesn't mean one implies that men and women aren't different, it means one believes men and women should be given the choice to not conform without fear of being ostracized. Other people seem to be confused in a different way: if women don't make these choices they already have, it must mean to them that "patri…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:40 AM
5

Explain to them that they're being rapey for complaining and watch the heads explode.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:12 AM
10

I thought Mulan was especially great because it showed both that women were capable and in relation to this sub that the general population overlooks, it showed that men needed not be disposable. For those who don't know, Mulan's ailing father was originally drafted for war and she wanted to save him.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:10 PM
7

Taking the abuse is not an option. It is potentially life threatening. It doesn't even matter how much evidence you collect. Prosecutors have argued that even with video, the man could have hit her after he stopped recording.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:08 AM
10

I find it potently ironic that even though it seen as progressive, Scandinavia is extremely facsist.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:49 PM
4

If anything, MRAs are the last to dismiss women who wish to be seen as autonomous human beings because infantilization of women and their lack of agency is the cause of many if not most MRA issues. So what exactly are you talking about?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:47 AM
1

Overnight? Men's rights has been around for 100 years, fighting for the option for men to leave traditional gender roles like women have. Next to zero progress.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:37 PM
1

I'm not whining, I'm being completely and brutally realistic after a thorough examination of the facts. I'm telling you that there will be no changes and educating others has not worked. They refuse to be educated. That's the hard truth.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:28 PM
1

"Inborn group sustainment reaction" is the source of bigotry. Racism is just as natural as you said, right? What other conclusion would you come to if someone had a bias toward their own race? Just because it is a mentality born 10,000 years ago doesn't make it not bigoted. If anything, it makes it even more deplorable.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:41 PM
4

If that was true, that would mean men are naturally misandrist too. Won't argue with that. The important part is knowing that you have the ingrained bias so you can override it when you feel it coming up. Sadly, I don't think that most people are willing and thus able to do this.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:18 AM
8

I was asking a question, not making a statement. The only possible conclusion that can be reached from fukuaneveryoneuknow's post is that most women are naturally misandrist if the data is correct. Personally, I think there might be a correlation/causation problem here. It may very well be that this in group bias is either a result of or at least exacerbated by 40+ years of feminist brainwashing.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:40 AM
6

So are women just naturally misandrist?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:18 AM
2

We live in a profoundly sick society.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:25 PM
1

Not every single teacher is the same, nor is every student. These kids didn't research and kill their specific "tormentors," they sprayed bullets randomly killing whoever they saw first.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:49 AM
16

It is a commonly held belief in this subreddit that women defining what a "real man" is should be seen as the manipulative, controlling nonsense it is and how it attempts to enforce rigid gender roles. Why then should men get to decide what a "real woman" is?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:14 PM
2

I disagree. If I have become aware, then I will not do it.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:41 AM
22

They aren't "poor boys", though. They are and were sociopaths. Many boys can't cope with how they're told they're evil for the way they were born and routinely commit suicide. These boys reacted in a much more implosive manner, letting the hate for them fester and morph into extreme hatred for society, but killed innocent people who may have very well felt the same as he did. He killed people who could have potentially liberated him, and this is why it is impossible to fight hate with hate. So t…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:08 PM
5

It does seem to be most. Really sad what society has become. Still, there is a silver lining in that even after 40+ years of brainwashing from birth, there is still a significant minority of women that don't wish to demonize masculinity or believe that masculinity is deficient.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:31 PM
11

I think this is a very salient point because much of this frontal lobe abandonment by men when there are women around is the cause of perhaps most of our problems.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:05 PM
66

"I tried to demonize masculinity and all I got was school shootings."
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:47 PM
5

It's a shame you have internalized hate for all men based on the actions of 2 assholes.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:06 PM
1

Their signs said exactly the same thing the slutwalkers' did. They asked "what are we doing here" after the slutwalkers complained about their exact same signs. This isn't antagonism, and it's really odd this complete nonsense is upvoted at all.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:58 PM
2

May I ask why you call yourself a feminist?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:53 PM
3

ABC probably didn't allow him to record, although I have a naive hope that Paul sneakily let his phone record the audio anyway. If he tells us he did though, ABC will not air the segment so don't expect an answer.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:24 AM
1

You got me all wrong. I agree with that. I was replying to nitoko who said they were vaginas and and I half jokingly said they are vulvae, not technically vaginas. Personally I don't think maybe but one or two of the pussies on display are unattractive, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:44 PM
1

Vulvae. Nothing wrong with those vulvae.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:00 PM
2

Wow, I feel so much better now. Thanks david-saint-hubbins for helping me see clearly.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:19 AM
5

Well, after thinking about it more closely, maybe a woman expecting a man to pay for the date doesn't alone make her a bad person. I don't think I was in the right state of mind. Just really angry at all the shit I've seen and how I was boned by a girl who stole from me. Maybe many just think it makes sense for the person who initiated to pay? I guess that makes sense. Yeah, I get what you're saying now. Sorry if I was rude. Still think men should strive to be a bit more scrutinous with women, b…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:15 AM
0

Please tell that to david-saint-hubbins then, as he said exactly that.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:26 AM
2

It definitely does mean they are bad people. They conform to an extremely obvious double standard in which they liberate themselves from select gender roles while forcing men to conform to gender roles, and men are just as bad for going along with it. I've seen enough to stop making excuses for people by saying they're simply "misguided." No, this society is profoundly ill. It is evil, sick and demented with a minority of good people who don't conform to it. I'm not making excuses for barbarians…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:23 AM
-1

Good God people, are you serious? Uh, no. Never said that. What does this mean then? I'd much rather we all lived in an equality utopia, but I'd also like to get laid once in a while. Well?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:13 AM
1

"Everybody else?" East Asians have the lowest fertility rates on the planet.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:44 AM
1

I'm not foolish enough to hope this will change anytime soon. So what should we do? Abandon the subreddit and tell the admin to shut it down?
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:48 PM
5

It's bad of course. It's war after all. But worse? Have you read up on what happens to Congolese men? Do yourself a favor and don't.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:30 PM
10

The only men these women can find who want to marry them are male feminists they aren't attracted to. They will continue to moan "where have all the good men gone?" as this problem for them continues to grow. Hell, most Japanese men now identify with the "grass eater" label and Japanese women can find no one who wants to even be with them and they're still too stupid to figure it out.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:03 AM
6

Uh, no. China places an extreme importance on height. Having painful leg bone surgery to become taller is quite common.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 12:25 AM
1

It's already extremely easy for them so say anything they want. To expand on what mhra1 said, have you heard of the concept of the Overton Window? An extremist presence can actually help tilt the cultural zeitgeist in their direction, counterintuitive though it may seem.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:41 PM
3

They'd be labeled misogynist regardless of what they do. This article was written by a woman, however, so she probably feels she can be shocking without much consequence as that label is difficult to pin on her.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:21 AM
9

Insane and unreasonable compared to what, a group that can only be described as a collection of savage cave people cheering the near death of a man after being falsely accused of sexual assault?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:13 PM
1

I'm not going to entertain any Newspeak BS where words don't really mean what they mean.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:31 PM
1

He wasn't talking about the average intelligence of the sexes. Stossel: "So you're saying women are smarter than men?" Farrel: "Yes."
/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:40 AM
2

Good God, what defeatist nonsense. I've rejected many women and have never, ever been called gay. The woman actually ends up being depressed and I have to tell her to not let it bother her.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:21 AM
8

Farrell spews some serious bullshit concerning how women's choice to pursue a more balanced work-life approach makes them smarter than men or something equally retarded. There's a problem though: Men don't have a choice when it comes to the matter. They must work and that's that. He also says this more balanced approach leads to more happiness, yet women are the unhappiest they have ever been. One also wonders about the state of the economy if men worked less and thus much less overall collectiv…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:13 AM
6

The word "creep" is used oft by women seemingly afflicted with both paranoia and narcissism. Someone using it as shorthand for every guy they aren't attracted to is woefully arrogant with an IQ around 80 at best, so I wouldn't pay it much attention. What you describe seems anecdotal in nature, though. I've never seen a man rejecting a woman face any repercussion. Usually it's the woman who becomes depressed. It has to do with "not wanting to pay a nickel for her Lexus" to quote GWW.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:05 PM
1

I upvoted your other post because it highlighted an obvious double standard, but I would caution you not to fall into a dangerous victim complex.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:19 AM
2

If only we had the Canadian system of health care. Granted, the tax burden is high in Canada while states like New Hampshire shout “live free or die”. Unfortunately the latter option is being pursued. Oh, brother. NH is an amazing, beautiful State. I wish its model was being pursued.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:47 AM
12

These aren't just "young single guys", they are underage, one of which was 14. That's fucking sick.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:31 AM
2

I will never experience the full gratification of it, ever. Stem cells may one day fix it. Never say never.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:04 AM
2

To begin with, many muslim women like to cover themselves. Being brainwashed into thinking your an immodest whore if you don't cover yourself can make women "like" it, yes. Many of them haven't given in to the brainwashing and are forced to do it anyway. Western women had the same mindset regarding covering their legs. They enjoyed it because society and their parents told them to.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:03 AM
3

That book would've been so much better if Rand had hired an editor to cut its size so it wouldn't be so damn preachy and be less hyperbolic. I digress though; "equality" and "fairness" are now mostly used by people i.e. feminists who engage in egregious doublethink, so men receiving lesser pay is now equal and fair.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:13 AM
2

Totally agree, they're trying to wrestle back their control of all discourse.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:05 AM
7

Those aren't insinuations, they're flat out accusations of misandry toward Feministing, a group that borders on radfem, and unless Feministing is synonymous with all women, than no, the author of the article hasn't offered any woman bashing here and you're being disingenuous using said article as an example of it. If you had bothered to read "Don't be that bitch" you would realize the title was a pun on something stupid Nicki Minaj, someone who loves to frequently use that word apparently, said.…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:50 AM
10

Elam likes to swear. This is a far cry from woman bashing. The worst thing Elam did which he had to apologize for was being a complete asshole to Stardusk, a man. The critique that the MRM is "prone to toxic rhetoric that subverts its valid points and alienates potential supporters" is dead on. This is by far the biggest weakness of the movement right now. What pathetic and shameless concern trolling. Get a clue: this "toxic rhetoric" they speak of means men who reject the idea that all mens' pr…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:06 PM
1

I've never heard of that one before.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:00 AM
12

Not only does he believe that women can self inseminate, this prime example of an evolutionary dead end is a hodgepodge of double standards. Everything he questioned about "why do men do x to women" makes just as much sense as the reverse, i.e. it is completely meaningless when gender is brought into the equation. That people are able to make such ridiculous statements without feeling the slightest cognitive dissonance is a result of an ancient and, in modern terms, evil biological mindset in wh…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:42 PM
2

Pretty good, but imo "evil" would be a more hard hitting word than simply "cruel."
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:12 AM
15

The irony is that women don't respect the woeful non-assertiveness this pathetic list recommends.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:04 PM
0

I guarantee this white uncle tom is into cuckolding.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:59 AM
0

Here's a privilege checklist. I don't think the particular point of being drafted to fight and suffer and die in war is a measure of oppression that can be topped because it involves the final stage of oppression: death.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:23 PM
1

The higher rate of suicide amongst young men, when compared to young women, is often cited as proof that women have it easier in our society, or that men are “the disposable gender”. It is an absolute tragedy that so many young men come to see killing themselves as the only way out of their problems, and we need to do so much more to support them. But I honestly believe that this is an effect of the damaging model of masculinity which patriarchy tries to impose upon men, not a result of women in…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:05 PM
4

The academic and intellectual vanguard of feminism is the only feminism that matters, even if it's a minority. The fact is this "minority" has done everything in its power to marginalize men without so much as a grain of subtlety or remorse, so excuse me if I don't give a shit about what a concern troll who screams "NAFALT" thinks.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:31 PM
-1

I did say "token examples" before anyway. Still no sources for the claim either.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:54 PM
-2

The reverse on the ban came after multiple lawsuits were filed by groups like the Service Women's Action Network. I can't find any sources for this. All their website says is that it was a "unanimous input from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff." Even if this is true however, Service Women's Action Network is hardly a mainstream feminist organization, and you look on their website regarding the reversal, they state that "the absence…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:46 PM
-1

So no one ever lobbied for it except for the people who did? Just checked: the decision to lift the ban was by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and I can't find any evidence of lobbyists that influenced the decision. What do you mean my biology? I made the edit to the post that now includes the previously absent word "think." For combat there are physical limitations not genital ones so the gender ban never made sense and was inspired by sexism against women. Not that the edit matters much as you clear…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:53 PM
-1

No feminist has ever made a push to let women serve in combat? Do you think the ban simply expired? The retraction on the ban of female combatants was a decision by the military due to more diversity in said military and higher reliance on technology in the field. No one outside of maybe a select few token individuals lobbied for it. Yes combat is awful but women have been prevented from serving because they're seen as weaker and incapable of it and no other reason. I'm sorry you think biology i…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:37 PM
4

The people who connect /r/mensrights to that sub will not listen to people from here who say that it isn't connected regardless about how clear you make it. They've made up their mind way beforehand, they have an agenda and that's that.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:19 PM
1

This one can actually be taken as a women's right issue of whats expected of their role in society. Men forced to die in combat and women protected from it, yeah that's a women's rights issue alright. Of course feminists would invade the sub and upvote this utter garbage. For shame.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:05 PM
3

It's the same as not letting women work, not declaring men expendable. This is so wrong I don't even know where to begin. It is nowhere near the same as not letting women work because: No woman or feminist ever lobbied for combat roles for women. Combat roles aren't "work" in any traditional sense. The objective is to kill or die. Thus, men weren't "allowed" and women "not allowed" into combat roles, men were forced into them and women protected from them. It is most definitely male disposabilit…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:02 PM
7

If you want to propagandize effectively, pictures and infographics work very well depending on how they're executed.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:40 PM
3

And diversity is also a concern. Less than 15 percent of teachers, in all grade-levels, are black. False equivalence. Blacks are 12.9% of the population so this number makes perfect sense. Males, however, make up 49% of the population.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:04 PM
1

In the States, anybody can fire anyone for any reason they'd like? No. Firing someone solely due to race, gender or sexual orientation is illegal.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 12:44 AM
2

...and while some things like Men Going Their Own Way kind of freak me out (being totally candid here, that website is extreme in my perspective)... May I ask why you find this extreme? Is the idea of men not giving you their attention really that alien? It shouldn't be. Many Buddhists practice it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:04 PM
0

The women on your side absolutely fucking hate your guts, dude. Sorry, it's the truth. All the liberal bashing does is give credence to the feminist argument that MRAs are all neanderthal conservatives stuck in the 40s. I suppose if you jump through several logical fallacies then it would lend credence to that argument, perhaps.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:53 PM
8

No because Zimmerman approached Martin first. It is not illegal to approach somebody but it is illegal to commit felony assault and battery to someone for doing so.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:12 AM
2

That still doesn't explain a 7x gap though.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:56 AM
17

They would have said "example" if they wanted it to be an example, not "usually" which seems to indicate bias.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:37 AM
2

Fertility rates in Europe, particularly Eastern Europe, are higher than they were during the low point of 1.1 children per women during the early 2000s. It's even more visible in Russia, where it's gone from 1.1 to approx. 1.6 for Russians and still rising. Similar with Ukraine, but still quite below replacement level. So to say it's a "general trend in Europe" would have been correct ten years ago.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:02 AM
5

So what do we do? Go back to living in the 1700's to get our sperm count back up?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:37 PM
1

High level Islamists engaging in rampant homosexuality. Cannot compute.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:27 AM
20

It has long been known that rationalwiki is run by baboons.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:20 AM
2

The labor pool increased dramatically during the 1800's and wages still went up faster than at any time in history. Demand for labor is never static.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:31 AM
4

Potato bag shaped women is a new phrase I'm borrowing.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:08 AM
2

Calabretta v. Floyd ruled that social workers are not entitled to qualified immunity if thh entry is non-consensual without a search warrant. OP should ask to see a search warrant each and every time they come.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:13 PM
4

If you show me proof of feminists at the time not assembling to address the coddling of women in the courts First rule of logic: You cannot prove a negative.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:22 PM
1

Good God his website is so freaking 90's. Early 90's Netscape shit. He doesn't even have dates for his posts.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:46 PM
1

and working on getting men to enjoy such a sweet deal. Men currently do not have this choice to do so.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:50 PM
4

The irony of Shrodinger's rapist is that they too are Shrodinger's rapist.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:12 PM
1

There is a minority of women who aren't perpetual children as you seem to imply. Overt generalizations, even if they describe the majority, are still untrue.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:24 PM
5

If you guys want to sit back and watch with some popcorn as the fires of despair (or fires of justice depending on how you want to look at it) consume the West, I would highly suggest getting the hell out long before then. Assuming they won't consume you too just because you didn't buy into feminist bullshit is naive at best.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:16 PM
1

It's not just manufacturing jobs, it's overall output. Meanwhile, the more affluent societies of the global north are able to spend more time enjoying services, and the range of services expands as firms seek to open new niches in the market, since manufacturing and the primary industries are highly developed already. Affluent Places like Detroit and Baltimore? Now this is wishful thinking. The collapse of Greece, Cyprus, Ireland, and the ever increasing number of countries that now and will nee…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:37 AM
2

At what point do you think forced male sacrifice will reach a zenith and not be logically sustainable? Or are you saying that it is indefinitely sustainable? I'm not so sure. They would have to abandon all pretense of subtlety if they were to go into complete gendercide mode. "They" being the powers that be. I can't imagine it being doable.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 06:03 PM
5

Women, collectively, will never have to deal with the consequences on the scale that men do. Human afflicted consequences, yes. Natural consequences do not discriminate though. It's definitely not wishful thinking. The silver lining is very thin, and beneath it is something ominous: Many people, mostly innocent, may end up suffering in some way. Not something I'd wish for.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 01:53 PM
1

I dont see how my argument is a "strawman", seems ur angry that I am pointing this stuff out. People having an argument are not always angry. This is why professional debaters don't call each other names. So, IOW, you have no response to the DOJ's white male discrimination policy on hate crime investigations. That was my response. The implication by the Washington Times, a hardly unbiased publication, was that the DOJ won't charge blacks with hate crimes based on very vague statements, but the D…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:04 AM
5

You'd be surprised at how stupid a country the UK is. Not that the US is any better, though.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:51 AM
2

The first link you cited says that: "Here is the catch. DOJ will only investigate bullying cases if the victim is considered protected under the 1964 Civil Rights legislation." The Civil Rights Act was made purposely vague in order to technically cover everyone. You can go to the DOJ website and see statistics of blacks that have been charged with a hate crime against whites. Not nearly as much as the reverse, but still quite present. Should make it clear that I am not saying whites are the most…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 11:42 PM
5

It's definitely true those race riots in Wisconsin were disgusting and everybody who participated should have been deported with a firecracker up their ass. Incidents like these however seem to be quite rare. Compared to systemic daily abuse of black men by police in highly disproportionate numbers and the general societal attitudes seen in this video, the riots seemed to be an isolated incident. Therefore we can conclude from this that stating "white people are the most discriminated against" i…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:13 AM
1

Yeah but people converged around the black guy immediately when his and the white guy's stance were identical.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:47 AM
1

This is such bullshit. A crowd has the mind of a five year old child and will believe anything that goes against the zeitgeist is crazy regardless of demeanor. Hell, most people in general believe anyone who doesn't conform to their own personal biases is crazy. Your basically using a variant of the bandwagon fallacy. Paul's rhetoric may actually prove to be quite beneficial. Look up the Overton Window.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:14 PM
4

However you should still acknowledge that they have existed and continue to shape the life experiences of both white and non-white people today. This is a complete bullshit implied strawman that race hustlers ejaculate with disturbing frequency. There is no indication anywhere that this individual never acknowledged systemic racism and it's foolish to think so because almost nobody denies it. Hell, the KKK doesn't even deny it. They're fucking proud of it.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:18 AM
7

Every day, plenty of nice, reasonably normal women are already tired from defending the word “feminism” from the angry, annoying trolls who think that acknowledging sexism means misandry. So pointing out the gross imbalance between men and women in suicides, workplace deaths, military deaths, homelessness, sentencing for the same crimes, and education enrollment makes us "angry annoying trolls?" What planet do these people live on?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:40 AM
2

Proof of innocence is expected in Russia. People were sent to gulags by word of mouth alone.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:27 PM
-1

"I don’t feel women are equal. I feel they’re above us." Fuck this guy.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:50 PM
3

Over here women are expected to bring out tea for the men (even when they're both the same level of teacher, this is a woman's responsibility). I got into an argument with a Japanese woman who told me that "this is the way things are" and that no woman would ever complain because it's traditional or some bullshit. Definitely a two way street; most women would fight to preserve the status quo.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:22 PM
1

Haha that's right, Asians are rarely used as the token hate targets people(mostly leftists) use when trying to make their opponent look prejudiced. I think you should be proud of that, though.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:58 PM
3

You mean a group to be less sympathetic towards, I assume? But yeah, that shit'll be over their head forever.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:24 PM
9

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:16 PM
1

Who watches the watchers? Who watches the watchers of the watchers? What happens when the individual can't even safely ensure four crossbeams from structural weakness? Surely that means the regulations have failed. That's the problem with regulation: ad absurdum. 1000 crossbeams are much safer than 4. Why not make it 1000 or even 10,000? Why are bureaucrats all of a sudden experts on safety?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:28 AM
1

This seems to be highly contradictory. One cannot believe in liberty without believing in it wholly. Economic liberty and social liberty are unshakably intertwined.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:18 AM
1

The article reeks of white ethnocentrism.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:01 AM
-2

Fuck colleges. These stupid fucks will get what's coming to them when their useless degrees can only land them a shit job. Go get me a a big mac, cunt.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:25 AM
1

Women can't reproduce anything without sperm.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:09 AM
1

The reason that MRA is so often criticized by feminism is not because we disagree with legitimate viewpoints such as treatment within family court, male-only selective service, or distribution of resources in homeless or domestic abuse programs. The reason is that discussions on these tend to marred with overt sexism. Women are seen as oppressors due to the leniency granted to them from their protected class. Most of these criticisms of overt sexism are in fact made over "disagreements" (if you …
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:13 PM
18

Anyway, Ayaan Hirsi Ali is pretty much just a bigot. No more than Hitchens when he eviscerates the Catholic Church, you selective buffoon. *Edit: By the way, at least no Catholic has tried to kill Hitchens. Ali's position in which she has people who would gleefully kill her if given the chance pretty much strengthens all her points.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:24 PM
-1

Adam Lanza's killing spree was a way obtaining revenge on the whole of society. Arguably, he succeeded. I believe the Futurist from singularity2050 talked about how the misandry bubble would eventually burst. Killing sprees like these will continue to become more common until complete chaos and collapse ensues. A most cold and protracted social vengeance.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 08:15 PM
2

The amount of dysfunction in congress has risen as more female senators have been sworn in. Don't tell these idiots that, though.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:12 AM
2

I've had professional help, but it only does so much good. Don't misunderstand, I'm not involved in men's rights to the degree you think I am. I understand the plight and have plainly seen the egregious and obvious social double standards and perversions of the law when it comes to men long before I ever came here. I have little empathy for them, however, as the collective not only does nothing to change the status quo, the majority will actually fight to preserve it. It's a truth few are willin…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:12 AM
14

This is a list on how to be a slave. The guys in this video are honorable men who don't let women have power over them.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:36 PM
2

Cho Seung Hui was Asian.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:16 AM
2

Wow that just happened as I switched back here to reddit and read your comment. Damn. So fucking pink.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 02:11 AM
4

The population in Japan will decrease by more than half if projections are correct (which they rarely are), but the projected 45 million people at 2100 is hardly "racial suicide."
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:54 PM
1

Translation: "I can't reply to that, so here's a link in order for me to vainly attempt to save face." If you think you're being witty, than I feel sorry for you.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:05 AM
1

I'll believe the neuroscientist before you. Believing that the Quran says whatever you want it to say is typical among dogmatists, the same as creationists and evangelicals when it comes to the bible. I don't care to examine your slab of unattributed text to closely, but (by way of example) your quote: “The unbelievers among the People of the Book [Christians and Jews], and the pagans, resent that any blessing should have been sent down to you from your Lord” (2:105). is rendered in the most aca…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:00 AM
5

Oh wow, 1993. I had hoped this was recent. I didn't even realize his book was that old.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:03 AM
1

“God has cursed them in their unbelief” (4:46). “God will not forgive those who serve other gods besides Him; but He will forgive whom He will for other sins. He that serves other gods besides God is guilty of a heinous sin. . . . Consider those to whom a portion of the Scriptures was given. They believe in idols and false gods and say of the infidels: ‘These are better guided than the believers’” (4:50–51). “Those that deny Our revelation We will burn in fire. No sooner will their skins be cons…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:34 PM
1

Meanwhile, have fun interpreting these passages in the Quran. “It is the same whether or not you forewarn them [the unbelievers], they will have no faith” (2:6). “God will mock them and keep them long in sin, blundering blindly along” (2:15). A fire “whose fuel is men and stones” awaits them (2:24). They will be “rewarded with disgrace in this world and with grievous punishment on the Day of Resurrection” (2:85). “God’s curse be upon the infidels!” (2:89). “They have incurred God’s most inexorab…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:34 PM
1

Are you saying there's something wrong with tribal religions? That's an interesting red herring. You got numbers? Give me some numbers. All I need is one: 90% of Jordanians support death for apostasy. That's 5.8 million people. Read the Wikipedia article on the subject. Christianity has quite a record of this practice (along with most major religions), and in fact alleged forced conversions of Hindus to Christianity is a big current-affairs issue in India at the moment. A record it indeed has, b…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:31 PM
3

Nonsense. Deaths for sorcery and other religious offences are far from unknown in (non-Islamic) Africa and Papua New Guinea among other places. Places with very high amounts of followers of tribal religions? Do any of these tribes have followers of over 1.5 billion? Are you saying Islam is a tribal religion, contradicting your apologetics? How many beheadings for witchcraft or apostasy are there in Turkey, Albania or Lebanon? You took one aspect (witchcraft execution) of seventh century practice…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:43 AM
1

Probably because Islam is the only religion where beheadings for witchcraft are still practiced whereas other religions haven't done that for hundreds of years, among other things that Islam and only Islam still seems to practice in extremely large and significant numbers like honor killings, death for blasphemy and apostasy, "Jizya" tax for non-muslims, forced conversions, stoning for adultery, stoning for rape (which is seen as adultery), death for homosexuality, lashes for minor blasphemies, …
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:40 AM
4

Seems like a "too bad" sorry rather than a "my fault" sorry. As in "sorry what happened to your friend, but I'm not giving up my seat that I paid for especially if you're going to be a loud, racist, sexist cunt."
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:25 AM
0

but in our society we think being collaborative is more noble or better. Which is ironic considering collaboration, especially in business, is the catalyst for corruption whereas competition is meant to minimize it.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:56 AM
13

Celebrating the fact that more men are losing jobs is so sick it's comparable to a skinhead celebrating the fact that more blacks are in jail, yet few people will notice the irony of prefacing the article with "we love men" and then taking sadistic pleasure in the fact that men die earlier, one of several facts in this article (and I use the term "fact" lightly) that is exacerbated not by nature, but by society.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:08 AM
1

Stories like this have all but convinced me that the outcome described in The Futurist article "The Misandry Bubble" will be all but inevitable.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:45 PM
-17

I wish I could tell this motherfucker to his face that we are here in your city and we're growing, and there's nothing you can do about it. What are you gonna do about it asshole?
/r/MensRights06/05/12 09:22 PM
1

White guy here, born into poverty and still not too well off. Looking for my privilege in relation to Obama, Oprah, Will Smith, etc. Can't find it. Could really use some. Wish I could get some Asian privilege, what with the higher wages and nearly non-existent poverty rates and prison populations.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:54 PM
1

this is because whatever progress matrimonial law has made in India has brought it closer to Islamic law. I'm sure women in Saudi Arabia and pretty much everywhere else with an Islamic majority would love to hear this.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 11:35 PM
-1

The commercial was touching, but honestly, I can kind of see what primaloath is saying. If she was my daughter, I would have denied that I ever had one and if I saw her like that I would have said "good riddance." I don't understand the supreme masochism of loving someone who hates your guts.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 11:07 PM
2

This isn't 4chan.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:39 AM
4

You generalize women and make hostile comments about them. *Citation needed
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:36 AM
1

Touche, but I do recall there used to be a rather significant public outcry over them. I naively thought those golf clubs were simply banned, but I was wrong.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:14 AM
0

I have no idea what gender you are and I don't care but bitch, asshole, it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:12 AM
15

So first you appeal to popularity and then you say we have to prove a negative followed by posts many of which are completely relative and many of which don't even mention feminism or women. Simply repeating something doesn't disprove it, you actually have to argue. I know SRS trolls are too lazy to even do that, but you could at least try. *edit grammar
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:09 AM
10

There are hundreds of feminist sites that are the female supremacist equivalent of Stormfront and they aren't on any lists despite haveing been in operation for years. This isn't a red-herring, it's a sign of clear hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:26 AM
16

It's a waste of time. Every single thread could be policed 24/7 so that only "non-offensive" posts remain approved and r/mensrights would still be on that list. They have SAVE on it for Christ's sake. This was bound to happen sooner or later. MLK was put on terror watch lists, after all.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:24 AM
0

SRSTroll Downvote and Ignore
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:06 AM
19

Appeal to authority. SPLC is just as susceptible to corruption as any other insitution, arguably more so. Using manboobz, a site that routinely harasses male victims of rape and DV, is pretty damning evidence.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:04 AM
4

All I can say is, people are paying a lot of attention to the Men's Rights Movement now, the good, the bad and the ugly. And they will focus on the ugly, time after time. So they're fighting us, which means the next stage is winning.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:58 AM
11

Because this guy represents the entire sub despite being heavily downvoted. Being designated a hate group with false statistics and complete and utter smears based on zero facts whatsoever doesn't really bother many people here.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:54 AM
1

You ignore the giant squid in the room being that people would fucking flip if any organization had an event that banned women and was men only. Double standards should be the main discussion here.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:20 AM
37

Does anybody in here see anything fucking wrong with this sentence? "Another resource is the Man Boobz website (manboobz.com), a humorous pro-feminist blog (its tagline is “Misogyny: I Mock It”) that keeps a close eye on these and many other woman-hating sites." Manboobz is THE most misandrist site in existence and routinely harasses male rape and domestic violence victims. A red flag should be going off. This is like full uniformed Nazis accusing the Jews of being racist.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:17 AM
4

SRS trolls are invading the thread. These people are pure misandrist hate filled scum.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:10 AM
-3

You are a disgusting fucking human being.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:10 AM
3

I'll take that dare you motherfucking bitch.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:06 AM
8

This list would make more sense if the SPLC had a list that also had Jezebel and r/feminism, which arguably have even more man-hate than any of these groups have women-hate. If they are going to label a group based on the ramblings of a minority of individuals, the SPLC might as well be consistent, but they aren't even that. This sheer hypocrisy exposes them for the wretched hive of scum and villainy that they are.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 04:33 AM
3

They already get downvoted, I don't know what the hell more you want. This subreddit won't lose it's anti-woman reputation the same way resistance fighters in 1984 didn't lose their thought criminal reputation. They want us to have this reputation regardless.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:16 AM
12

You can't spell jail, a 4 letter word, correctly.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 07:50 PM
8

Male characters can be overly sexualized too but it's done in a different way, one that overvalues physical strength and power. Please explain why a "different way" of sexualizing is more or less justifiable than another. but I think it's fair to suggest women's body issues are more related to female idealizations in various media. Could not the same be said of men?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:45 PM
1

I'd argue that tasteless as GTA is, at least you can't shit on prostitutes like this game. Just WTF. edit* grammar
/r/MensRights24/02/12 02:47 PM
1

"You see, this is what passes for humor among the urban sophisticates who mock the "guns and religion" crowd behind their backs." Fucking love this quote. All of these peoples' beliefs are a bastion of irony.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:11 PM
3

They might as well complain that it's illegal to perform human sacrifices because it's "Anti-Mayan."
/r/MensRights03/02/12 01:45 PM
4

The first couple in the pic is Asian.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:59 PM
2

There have been many a species that have driven themselves to extinction because there were too many females and thus too large a population that resources could not sustain.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:41 PM
1

...Well played OP. Well played.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 03:57 AM
1

It is actually against the law to not register.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:32 PM
1

Men and women, as similar as they are in so many ways, aren't the same Irrelephant.jpg
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:26 PM
0

Now I just want a boy even more just to spite these assholes.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:10 PM
3

I guess it hadn't occurred to these ad makers that for every quality a girl is better than a boy at, there is also a quality that a boy is better than a girl at. But let's just ignore the latter in order to stroke the ego of female supremacists.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:08 PM
-2

I can only wait for the day when Islamic fundamentalists behead the people who made these. Sweet irony.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:06 PM
4

If you can tolerate a cockney accent, you can tolerate a southern accent. It's not about being an "arrogant Yankee", you might as well go to Japan and complain about the Osaka dialect. Everyone has an accent, even smug cunts like you.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:09 PM
-2

Smug douche.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:06 PM
1

Brilliant rebuttal. Just chock full of facts.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 08:51 PM
1

Okay, then that explains your ignorance of the Constitution. My point was that the constitution is just a set of laws and rules, not some sacred text. You said: also why should anyone give a damn about the constitution That's a pretty far cry from "not a sacred text." ITT: A smug foreigner who thinks he's an expert on the founding document of another country.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:31 PM
1

This bullshit about the republicans trying to sabotage anything is an utterly pathetic attempt to redirect blame. They have had ONLY the House of Representatives for less than two years. Before that it was a democrat supermajority. The truth is the democrats are trying to sabotage the economy, the republicans are just trying to sabotage it at a slower pace. Both think they are doing good, however.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:25 PM
3

You're getting downvoted because what you said is fucking stupid. Obama is destroying the economy at a rate the republicans can only dream of.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:22 PM
1

The problem with the economy isn't capitalism, it's the LACK of it. *Edit: I don't know how someone can be so stupid as to say it is "unrestrained capitalism" that is destroying the economy. We don't have anything close to capitalism in this country. Look to Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore for your dreaded "unrestrained capitalism" and see how their rapid growth proves you pathetically wrong.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:20 PM
0

And Obama ISN'T destroying the economy right now? Are you fucking serious? He's been continuing the republican's policies on steroids. You are a partisan fuckwit.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:19 PM
-1

also why should anyone give a damn about the constitution Please get the fuck out of the country now, please. *Edit: You do realize that every public office holder has to swear an oath to it ever since the country was founded, right?
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:11 PM
-2

LOL Right, he predicted everything that has happened and you still "abhor" him. You abhor Ron Paul, you abhor the Constitution.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:10 PM
2

I heard from someone that Ron Paul actually spoke against VAWA at one point, but I can't find a source. Thrown into the memory hole, maybe?
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:08 PM
6

You're just committing yourself now to voting for tweedle-dum instead of tweedle-dee. Republicans simply offer you a different flavor of misandry, the be-a-provider/slave-and-stop-playing-videogames-and-man-up type.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:02 PM
7

Wow, mountain out of a molehill.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:10 PM
2

This guy wimped out. Too bad. I hate the term "real man" just like most people here, but if there's one thing that would qualify as being a real man it would be fighting back against injustice and telling these easily offended assholes to go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:05 PM
-12

Karma, bros. Just wait until Muslim fundamentalists decapitate the people who made this. When you think of the inevitability of karma, you'll be less angry.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 09:05 PM
1

No i merely point out that the information is factual, we did pretty much pillage, rape and enslave our way across the world. Newsflash, so did pretty much every other race.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:19 PM
2

Completely anecdotal and without a shred of proof. I said the most average american is sub par to the most average european or asian. Which is completely unsubstantiated, ethnocentric, and not to mention a bit racist.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:13 AM
-2

It honestly just reeks of a guy trying to compensate for a tiny schlong.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 12:17 AM
1

I've been to Intel, AMD, GE Global Research, CESTM and other organizations deep into the fields of nanotech, semiconductor technology and other material sciences. The one thing all of their senior research staff has in common is that very few of them are Americans. They may have a citizenship or a green card, but they weren't born and raised here. I can smell the bullshit a mile away. I've been to a Globalfoundries AMD fab in the U.S. and most of the engineers are American born, just like the fa…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 12:10 AM
-2

I see self-righteous Eurotrash cunts similar to you all the time, mostly lurking around Grand Central Terminal. They try to pull the "Americans are stupid" crap but they always fail because New Yorkers don't put up with that bullshit. It's always amusing to see you condescending pricks with your mouths agape after being shot the fuck down. That's one of the very few reasons for me to be proud of New York. Unsubstantiated? Been to any serious corporate/university scientific research departments l…
/r/MensRights11/10/11 09:42 PM
0

Most people from your country aren't too bright, either. See, I can make unsubstantiated nationalistic claims as well.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 07:26 PM
1

Take a poll of women in the US and see which one they prefer. As most men in the world are uncircumcised, most women in the world prefer non-mutilated dicks as well. Citing the views of women strictly in the U.S. about penises is like citing the views of men strictly in Iran about women's rights.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 07:23 PM
1

There have been several studies that conclude the difference in circumcised vs uncircumcised orgasm time is about 15 seconds. Whoop-de doo.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 07:20 PM
6

Why is discrimination wrong? Can't tell if troll...
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:28 AM
2

I'm saying the assertion that discrimination is always wrong is flawed. Sorry, but discrimination is always wrong. If you believe otherwise, you are a bigot.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:12 AM
2

It's not a "natural quality" of straight white men to dominate discourse -- it's a socialized trait symptomatic of systemic social inequality. Absolutely zero basis in reality. That doesn't even make any sense. Just admit it is YOU that is attempting to marginalize a group of people because of how they were born. That makes you a bigot. Now the first step in recovery is admitting you have a problem. I at least hope you are able to admit you are a disgusting bigot.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:08 AM
3

Not just "some Chinese" but a decent number of Asian and ancient Arabs as well. Combined, yes, they all do make up over 95% of what you see around you that is man-made.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:02 AM
2

So you are saying two wrongs do make a right? Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:59 AM
1

Interesting how I accumulated all these downvotes for stating a very likely future event. They won't need the internet because what will likely occur is a mix of anarchy with factions of totalitarianism that will basically kill anyone who says something misandric or what they feel is misandric. I didn't say I was looking forward to it. But I can't say I would feel too bad about the executed, either.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:55 AM
1

Apparently none of you have read "The Misandry Bubble" by The Futurist. If things don't change, it's inevitable that a collapse will occur. What form it will take, I don't know. One thing that can be guaranteed is much bloodshed. People carrying RPGs, martial law, etc. I'm not saying I am happy that it will occur, I am simply stating that it is inevitable if there aren't huge changes to how men are treated in law and society.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:48 AM
1

Fair enough, but like I said, these women were specifically talking about porn, not romance.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:40 AM
1

They weren't talking about romantic relationships, they were talking about porn.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:39 AM
-43

Those are the people that will be mercilessly executed when the shit finally hits the fan and society collapses. Part of me wants to get the fuck out of here before it happens but part of me wants to stay and watch.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:29 PM
1

Here's another clue: you will never, ever observe a woman judging a man the way he judges himself or other men. I'm inclined to disagree on the basis that I don't want to generalize women. Greed and selfishness is a pretty negative trait most people don't like to be branded with on the basis of how they were born. Do you have any sources to back up this claim?
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:15 PM
9

It's not that they're upset about men watching porn, it's that they are trying to make the definition of cheating fit their fucked up worldview. "Emotional cheating" sounds like something straight out of 1984.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:06 PM
1

I'd say that it's a good thing that these women said what they did. Now no sane guy would ever want to touch them. Every guy should be on their girlfriend like big brother. If you find posts like these or hear her say something like it then get the fuck outta there.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:51 PM
2

We now have a service sector economy with very little production and as more men leave the workforce production will decrease further robbing women of the fruits of men's labor. They'll just keep falsely convincing themselves that they don't really need men and by the time too many men have gone galt to reinforce that illusion, it'll be too late and the country will plunge into 100 years of darkness. Hong Kong, here I come.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:39 PM
0

So men are at a disadvantage whereas women are at an advantage. Does that mean men can now have a whole bunch of public funding and quotas and all those government goodies that women got? Imagine during the early 1900's when women couldn't vote and someone wrote an op-ed in the New York Times about how "women need to women up" if they want to get ahead.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:10 PM
3

I was in Japan recently and the term "be a man" was actually quite common. Here's the flip side though; women are also expected to be "real women." You couldn't get away with that here, what with all the double standards.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:04 PM
-2

Actually, no study has found a correlation between skimpy clothing and likelihood of being raped. The rapist has been targeting women exclusively in skimpy clothing. In this case, statistics don't fucking matter.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:38 PM
0

I think that's oversensitive. Highlighting a double standard isn't oversensitive. Apparently none of you understand that even if there were undeniable facts in the reverse connotation about something negative about women and more positive about men, it would be called sexist and unfair like phlake14222 said. Meanwhile, something positive about women and negative about men, even if there is only questionable data about it or even no data at all gets treated as truth.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:31 PM
5

Paul never ever said denying women the vote is a good thing or that they don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:33 PM
9

and businesses know that women want to feel superior to men. I can hear the NAWALT crowd screaming now...
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:28 PM
4

Why not a march for homeless people? Why the subdivisions? Detached and subdivided in the mass production zone...
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:33 PM
0

Yeah, I never said they weren't. You said these countries were "overwhelmingly atheist." I told you that was not true. Really simple. Deist != Atheist
/r/MensRights21/09/11 10:10 PM
2

Sorry, I didn't know the OP's history. I thought r/niggers didn't even exist.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:53 AM
1

Keep saying that whites don't deserve equal treatment and keep telling yourself that you aren't a racist. m'kay.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:22 AM
0

Yeah, with western European countries being overwhelmingly atheist. Lets see what the author has to offer for proof. No country in Europe is majority atheist; the closest is France with 33%.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:13 AM
1

"Equality" is a very strong weasel word special interest groups love to use because they seek to impose it in a cultural Marxist fashion i.e. equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity or equality under the law.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 09:46 PM
1

From the comments: "What a Pussy! you need a real man that can give you what you want!" I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 09:33 PM
1

I may be somewhat biased because back in high school I got jumped by a bunch of gangbangers who insisted I was responsible for slavery because I was white, but I don't see how anyone in the MRM refuses to "collectively recognize" anyone. As Christopher Hitchens would say: "just more babble."
/r/MensRights16/09/11 09:26 PM
3

A good number of black activists are indeed racists who thinks whitey is the enemy because he's white. They may not be the majority, but you can't pretend they don't exist.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 04:28 AM
-1

Dumb hoe.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 10:11 PM
1

I was gonna address this, but linearThinker illustrated your doublethink clearly.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 10:08 PM
2

The white man seems to subjugate the women and other races no matter where they go. Could say the same thing about any race and and it would make just as much sense; i.e. none.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 10:06 PM
6

It's not that women are a minority, it is that they are disadvantaged. Elaborate. How the fuck is getting preferential treatment in EDUCATION a disadvantage? Until women earn the same pay for equal work they are disadvantaged. The wage gap bullshit has been debunked countless times.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 03:21 AM
6

What the fuck is wrong with this country? This is the kind of shit that makes we want to side with self righteous Eurotrash who bash the U.S.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 10:50 PM
1

Some dude in Tunisia lights himself on fire which starts riots and civil wars across the middle east but something like this happens here and nobody will give a damn. I can just imagine how all of this pent up injustice will eventually explode and every young man across the western world will be carrying rocket launchers in the war torn streets.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:12 PM
0

Prices are tied to how much money people have to spend. Prices are tied to supply, demand, and competition in the markets. Prices in the U.S. are actually cheaper than in most places.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 07:00 PM
-2

And yet this attitude is what led to the U.S. becoming the richest, most prosperous nation in the world. Japan isn't different at all with respect to this attitude, and they are very prosperous as well.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 07:51 PM
2

A shame you feel the need to talk that way about the U.S. Army, you ungrateful fuck.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:18 PM
2

Men are anthropologically programmed to want to reproduce as much as possible, even if they recognize that programming, or not. All creatures that sexually reproduce are(I'll assume you meant "biologically") programmed to reproduce as much as possible, "whether they want to admit it or not."
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:05 PM
0

The contradiction being, if women hold all this power through their vagina, as many women in the comments seem to believe, then how were they ever oppressed? If there was any double standard worth highlighting as an injustice, it would be the idea that one set of genitals, and thus their holders, are superior to another set of genitals and their holders. The penis doesn't seem to be seen as something disgusting in Asia, as both a penis and vagina are needed to create life, and equal respect is g…
/r/MensRights13/08/11 05:43 AM
1

Sure, kick this productive tax payer out and spend money on that instead of spending it on stopping people from illegally crossing the borders now. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:36 AM
-1

LOL because only Rand recognized private ownership and voluntary exchange.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:20 AM
-1

This is a pretty loaded and biased video, and I won't even waste my time debating it. Translation: You won't because you can't. On the food front, there is absolutely no reason why we have starving people on this planet, as we already have more than enough resources and production to feed everyone. That wasn't the point. The point was that because food is arguably even more important than healthcare and thus if you advocate for universal healthcare then you must also advocate for food to be comp…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:30 AM
-1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WnS96NVlMI Good luck arguing for universal food care and universal heat/electricity care. After that have fun spending $200+ for a used game at Gamestop LOL.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:01 AM
1

The way SS was supposed to work was that you paid into the system and got the money back later in life, so in its original sense it isn't redistribution of wealth. It's no surprise that it's a giant cluster fuck that will barely be solvent for another 30 years after that original purpose was abandoned.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 07:30 PM
1

I think my point that it is a farce to say small government=good just as it is to say big government=bad. In fact I quote the article "Small government isn’t by default the solution neither is big government, its about effectiveness." I thought that was pretty straight forward. Countless examples throughout history have shown how big government is bad and small government is good. The argument is that a smaller government IS more effective while society retains more freedoms. Our founding father…
/r/MensRights07/08/11 07:20 PM
1

given how many right wing Americans actually want militias. Maybe because militias are both allowed and encouraged according to the 2nd amendment?
/r/MensRights07/08/11 05:16 PM
3

The original quote was racist. ThePigman's response to it highlighted why it was racist because all people do fucked up shit, including black people.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 05:00 PM
1

Sweden's all kinds of fucked up.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 07:58 PM
3

I remember filling this out when I came of age and the same disclaimer was there. I thought to myself: "Why do they have the option to select it then?."
/r/MensRights05/08/11 07:29 PM
4

I've been seeing a lot of bro trolls like this in the wild lately.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 05:08 PM
2

What I am saying there is precisely what I say...that men in general are beginning to treat women in general with suspicion and distrust, and women flat out deserve to be treated thusly, since they didn't give ANY consideration to what Feminist initiatives would impact like on men, or more likely believed men 'deserved it'. I've actually thought about this for awhile now, and I came to the conclusion that it's not entirely their fault, as feminism is the real-world equivalent to The Party from 1…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 05:07 PM
3

So below me you say it's okay to tell people to take preventative measures in order to avoid dangerous situations which is exactly what I said and yet you're saying that I'm placing responsibility on the victim even though I said I wasn't. Just so we're clear.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 03:14 AM
5

"It's intended as a comeback to those who imply that most sexual assault is deserved or provoked." Explaining to people that they can take steps to prevent a bad situation from occurring is in no way a justification for said situation and any who caused it should it occur. No other crime has this type of discussion. Nobody is saying that these types of rapes were "deserved" or "provoked," that's just a complete strawman argument born from hysterics. "By a longshot, most sexual assault..." There …
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:19 AM
1

Again, the solution is to attack male (and female) culture directly, not the private organizations which respond to this culture. By doing what they do, these organizations are ironically upholding and reinforcing this culture.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 12:56 AM
6

White Knights protecting women for simply being women isn't a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:08 PM
2

The motive for the crime is not something that determines culpability. Most men who commit crimes grew up in poor households and were abused too, but people only bring that up if a woman committed a crime.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:29 PM
0

I didn't mention Fox(even though CNN is equally as critical of Al-Jazeera) but honestly, no.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 04:31 AM
-6

You know, I really want to avoid a "bursting of the misandry bubble" event, but should the shit hit the fan and we come to live in a police state where people who up-vote these kinds of comments as well as the commenters were executed, I'd be okay with it. I mean, yeah, I'd eventually fight against it. Eventually. Seriously though, I almost feel bad for these people. They have no idea how close they are to extremely undignified deaths.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:32 AM
0

Al-Jazeera English is an excellent source of world news. Are you serious?
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:19 AM
2

Didn't see anything in there that acknowledged the fact that there are more male than female drivers. Any other demographics involved and that kind of info would've been the first statistic gathered. I guess we can also conclude the reason there are more men that are war dead is because they can't use a gun as well as women.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:18 AM
8

it could have been a hot skinny big-boobed blond and it would still be rape. Technically true, but I think most guys would give consent post-intercourse for something like that. I know I might get down-voted, but think about it: if you woke up to that hot skinny big-boobed blonde straddling you, would you really cry rape?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 12:24 AM
1

You basically rambled about a bunch of nothing. 9 Days and this was the best reply you could come up with? OJ got off scott free because he was a rich celebrity. Yes, richer than 99% of white people, and somehow they have privilege over him? You're defeating your own argument. If you think race didn't have anything to do with the O.J. verdict, you're deluding yourself. and it has nothing to do with tanning beds either, they are entierly seperate issues but i'm getting off track. No, it has plent…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 01:11 AM
1

You know, should the shit really hit the fan and we come to a point where people who think like this are executed by the state... I'd be okay with it.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:21 PM
5

Just because one form of genital mutilation is worse doesn't mean the other is good. Just like cutting off a finger isn't good just because cutting off a hand is worse.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:05 PM
9

The comments on that article are disgusting. What a fucked up society where newborns are mutilated and people can justify it by hiding behind the "freedom of religion" or "potential health risk" monikers. The U.S. is the only first world country on earth that performs a majority of circumcisions for non-religious reasons despite the fact that it has the highest rate of HIV among developed nations. Why do people still promote it as having less a risk of contracting HIV despite this fact? Really w…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:57 PM
3

Not gonna lie, I got hard.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:45 PM
11

If you are concerned over an issue of consent, then I must say "tough shit" to you, as everything done before you are 7, when logic kicks in for most people, could be considered to have been done without consent. Go cut off any other part of a child's body and then say to the police "Well, he's under 7, so it's OK." See how well it works.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:39 PM
1

Wrong, I was upset cause you decided to interject your bigotry into a men's rights subreddit. I know plenty of Christians I love, plenty of Muslims I hate, plenty of Christians that I hate, tons of Muslims worthy of praise and countless atheists that I wish would just shut the hell up all the time. Maybe you should actually read the part where I wrote: Now do I think individual Christians and Muslims are inherently bad people? For the most part, no, but the collective consciousness of a signific…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:54 AM
5

How do you know it's the first day?
/r/MensRights27/07/11 12:07 AM
0

Just wanted to add: People have been killing/mutilating each other for as long as the option has been available Only in Islamic theocracies are stoning, killing and mutilation still legal in the modern world. *Edit: This, combined with the fact that in every single country with a majority Muslim population, non-Muslims, especially Atheists, are either killed outright or given Dhimmi status, not to mention women not being allowed to vote or drive in most of these countries, makes it very troublin…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:26 PM
0

Nice use of sock puppet accounts. I recall my comment had 5 upvotes. If it makes you feel any better, I think Christianity is savage as well, and the history of both religions supports this view. It's really that simple. Now do I think individual Christians and Muslims are inherently bad people? For the most part, no, but the collective consciousness of a significantly large, dogmatic minority is enough to cause incredible damage, which is a trait of all religions, thus the ideologies themselves…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:22 PM
0

I didn't say Muslims, I said Islam as a religion. This shit isn't new. It's all bad, but theocratic Islamic countries have been torturing for much longer. That stuff makes Abu-Ghraib look like a playground.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:36 PM
2

The idea that husbands were slackers in the first place arose from the weird notion that chores only include housework. Case in point: my mother used to complain how no one helped her around the house, but with my father working 8 AM to 8PM and myself at school until late evening, I always wondered who she was talking to. My baby sister?
/r/MensRights24/07/11 03:09 AM
-1

the current version of which is a response to western individualism anyway. Feminism is no excuse for the savagery of Islam.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 09:11 PM
1

Sorry, but everything on that list can be easily debunked. blacks and latinos are three times as likely to be pulled over by cops. Blacks and Latinos commit a disproportionate amount of crime. White offenders are much more likely to be given lesser sentences than black offenders Source? O.J. got off scot-free. and the incarceration rate for black male offenders is much higher than white males. Again, blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime. I don't know why, so I'm not going to say why,…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:08 AM
1

As a male, especially is you are a white male you have privilege You may have had a point until you said this. There is absolutely no de facto nor de jure discrimination that benefits whites whatsoever. You cannot name a single one. There's also the fact that I was talking about privileges in specific situations, but overall privilege is something I can say that whites and males do not have.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:41 AM
3

How familiar are you with the laws of Swaziland? I'd just like to add that there is a difference between cultural relativism and moral relativism. People can't just violate objective human rights and hide behind the "it's their culture" bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 02:02 PM
2

I usually consider myself Libertarian, but I would have no problem if people like these were deemed enemies of the state.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 01:48 PM
1

My inner white knight is thinking that they should just drop the charges because she's so cute, but the rational me is saying "that's retarded, if it was a man no one would give a fuck how he looked."
/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:01 PM
1

The ironic thing is that if AA didn't exist then no one would assume that. It does you more harm than good.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 08:38 AM
0

I wonder if the Daily Mail commenters would say the things they are saying had the genders been reversed. Something tells me they wouldn't.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:00 AM
2

Maybe she's secretly Skepchick?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 02:57 AM
2

Men ran the world for years innumerable, and some would argue that we still do. This retarded argument has been debunked time and time again. It relies on selective cherry picking and the ignorant masses in order to seem right when you don't think about it. A very comparatively tiny amount of men ever "ruled the world." The rest were mostly on the bottom. Ever hear of the glass cellar? For a good chunk of human history, women got a pretty shitty deal. Shit, when the US was founded, they couldn't…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 01:32 AM
4

Very interesting how all of the sponsors are Democrats. One would think the religious right would be behind this.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 12:58 PM
3

Wishing more men would get castrated is creepy but it's just an opinion. Not only creepy, but pretty sexist as you can see from the comment. May not be "much" of an issue but like I said, still somewhat of an issue nonetheless.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 08:38 AM
0

While I readily agree there are specific areas where men are not treated well, I still never forget the fact that overall, being an American, white, male makes me a member of perhaps the most empowered demographic in the entire world. Are you trolling or just stupid?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 08:30 AM
1

I think people are allowed to have an opinion. Is it really a big deal someone might not conform to your world view?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:39 AM
1

I really don't get how some people fail to grasp the joke in its entirety. The problem is not the actual joke, but the double standard surrounding it. I absolutely guarantee that if the genders were reversed in this joke and a man was telling it to his significant other, he would easily be put in jail for threatening domestic assault should his wife choose to call the police. It would magically transform from a joke into something very serious. It's very easy to do that to a man. Not that easy t…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:29 AM
3

I really don't get how some people fail to grasp the joke in its entirety. The problem is not the actual joke, but the double standard surrounding it. I absolutely guarantee that if the genders were reversed in this joke and a man was telling it to his significant other, he would easily be put in jail for threatening domestic assault. It would magically transform from a joke into something very serious. It's very easy to do that to a man. Not that easy to do to a woman.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:28 AM
5

It's a men's rights issue because of comments like these from the video: "I say Off with the balls. Men are more nicer when testosterone is not pumping through their viens like gasoline. Just imagine how peaceful this world would be without testosterone. Anyway, I have castrated 36 men." These people are fucking sick, and there's no way around it.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:16 AM
0

LOL Wow. You really think your previous post didn't contain ad hominem attacks or straw man arguments? You are one stupid motherfucker. Go back to Wikipedia and read about the terms again. It's apparent I know more about them than you do. But dude... really... just wow. Yeah, I know. The truth. Like, wow. Really. You did make it sound as though women asexually reproduce. I told you that you need sperm to go along with those wombs to make babies, and you go fucking ape-shit on how I somehow don't…
/r/MensRights10/07/11 03:51 AM
1

That's why in most cultures men have to "prove" value to the group by some ritual while women do not. I don't know where the fuck you got this from. There is a tribe in Africa, for example, where women are voluntarily whipped in order to prove their womanhood and support of the man (a family member) in his ritual where he has to run four times over the backs of a herd of cows lined up without falling once in order to prove his manhood. This is just one example. There are countless rituals across…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:36 AM
1

Holy shit, this post is like a fucking orgy of straw man arguments and ad hominem attacks. Jesus dude, you need help. All I said was that men have reproductive value as well because they produce sperm, I never asserted that women weren't a bottleneck and are thus more valuable individually in terms of reproduction. No need to go postal.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:15 AM
0

You guys are forgetting something very important. Nature engineered the human species along with most other mammal species to be roughly equal in the amount of genders present. This is because if there were only a few males, succeeding generations would become severely genetically damaged. This can have severe consequences that may even sometimes lead to further endangerment. Males being able to conceive orders of magnitude more children than women is a fail-safe in the event of a catastrophe, b…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:38 AM
0

Uh, men provide sperm for those wombs too. An egg is just an egg without sperm, just like a sperm is just a sperm without an egg. You're making it sound like women asexually reproduce.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:14 AM
3

Damn, these people are retarded.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:35 AM
3

Would JJ put up any of those jokes, though? Hell no, feminists everywhere will scream sexism and patriarchy and the state will likely intervene. The one against men is fine, though.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:34 AM
1

It is up to the defense to show that injury is not enough to demonstrate rape. The burden of proof does not lie with the defense, moron. You can't prove a negative anyway.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:25 AM
2

Wow, you sure are victim blaming a lot. Blaming the victim of a false rape accusation. For shame.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:23 AM
8

That said, straight men can often understand how she feels if they have been hit on by other men. You get on the other side of being objectified as a sexual object for someone else's pleasure. I've been hit on gay guys numerous times. I politely told them "sorry guy, but I'm not gay" and that was the end of it. I didn't feel "objectified" or any of that bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:41 AM
2

No one can reasonably state that women are physically as strong, fast, or agile as men (in general). To make up for this, there's a case made that women are smarter and academically capable. The funny thing is that these morons think strength, speed, and stamina are the only physical traits there are. They completely neglect to mention how women in general have stronger immune systems, more elastic bones, etc. in order to perpetuate the false notion that men are physically superior and therefore…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:26 AM
2

God bless the French.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:16 AM
2

Of course something like this can only be published in Al-Jazeera. Just look at the comments. It's like Bin Laden himself is writing them. Hell one even says: "As for Bin Laden's violent Jihad, it was an answer to America's perversion and arrogance!" So Bin Laden's actions are justified because we consume porn and are perverted in their eyes? These people are fucking sick.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 06:45 PM
0

LOL You fucking moron, nowhere did I compare myself to Lincoln. You just completely avoided the point like a pussy.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 06:28 PM
0

Straw man, much? BTW, Marie Curie got her Nobel Prize before women in the U.S. were allowed to vote.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 09:41 AM
2

Replace "women" in those sentences with "whites." Still seem like completely accurate facts? Do you want little boys to be damaged for the rest of their lives? "Sorry son, but you are inferior to girls. There's no need to try so hard since you'll never be as good as them."
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:51 AM
-1

It's not a straw man, it's a legitimate comparison. Like it or not, society generally accepts feminism as a legitimate positive movement and yours as illegitimate. Maybe if you watch a lot of TV, but everywhere I go feminism seems to be falling off the edge of a cliff. Public forums more and more often talk about how evil feminism is, and feminists seemingly more and more often desperately claim that they aren't man-haters. You don't get to decide who is and who isn't part of society because it …
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:14 AM
1

Seriously man, just because she controls the pussy doesn't mean shit if men stop thinking with their dicks. Women also have sexual needs as well. You're insinuating that men are only lustful circle pegs and women are lust-less square holes, and that's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 10:46 PM
1

You're a stereotype and you want harmful stereotypes about angry men to get worse, not better. Seriously, what the FUCK are you talking about? Men have a reason to be angry, and the opposition will ALWAYS label men who talk about double standards against men as woman-haters because that line of thinking is flawed in the first place. It's like saying that during the 1800's if a black does x then he's another reason why blacks who talk about racism will get labeled white-haters by the KKK, as if t…
/r/MensRights01/07/11 10:40 PM
2

...Are you fucking stupid?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 09:09 PM
2

Reading that made me feel like a Jew reading Mein Kampf. The fact that this exists, as much as it pains me to say it, proves that far, far too many women in this culture are little different than the KKK. It's like some women's fragile egos were getting a little damaged, so the author wrote this in order to boost them. Really sad.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 12:52 AM
5

I'm tempted to say you're making a mountain out of a molehill. Although I understand that the actual "violence" isn't much of an issue here, it's the double standard surrounding it. Indeed, if the roles were reversed, NOW would probably blow a fucking gasket and demand a boycott of 5 hour energy.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 11:21 PM
3

The people commenting there are sick and deluded freaks. I encourage those on this sub-reddit to go over there and put these freaks in their place. We can't be silent when these scum are spouting their bile anymore.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 06:43 PM
1

it is only possible to act like society's idea of a boy or a girl. There have been numerous cases where parents try to get their kids to play with the opposite gender's toys, and almost always they end up trading them with toys made for their gender. Natural differences exist no matter how much you kick and scream. I've seen children exposed to this kind of failed social engineering who grow up with confused identities and severe mental health problems. David Reimer committed suicide because of …
/r/MensRights27/06/11 06:37 PM
2

Valuable to the individual, but society still only needs one man to repopulate. I remember reading on Yahoo Answers a long time ago that there is a very large benefit to having a wide range of male genes across humans and most mammals. I can't recall the exact wording, but there's a difference between humans where the distribution of X and Y sperm is roughly 50/50 and thus represented in the species as a whole and bees where most in the hive are workers with very few drones in comparison. A dron…
/r/MensRights26/06/11 08:17 AM
1

Very weird to hear these people talk about the matter when it isn't a feminist issue at all.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 02:16 AM
2

"Men have the responsibility to making sure a baby does not occur" Are you fucking stupid? Even committed femi-fascists concede that making sure a baby doesn't occur is the responsibility of the man AND woman.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 11:20 PM
3

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." We are in the early phases of "then they fight you." It'll probably get even worse. Just keep a stiff upper lip and eventually we'll get to the coveted next stage.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 05:42 PM
13

The Manboobz blog is basically where misandrists across the internet gather. It's pretty sad to see how many of them there are. Like Christopher Hitchens said: "Oh how far the termites have spread." If history is just, it will one day place them in the same camp as the KKK.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 08:51 PM
1

The problem which now exists is that female reproductive capacity is no longer the essence of survival, which it has been for all species for millions of years. There are tons of different species in history and in the present where too many females causes overpopulation and thus over-consumption of resources causing eventual endangerment. Humans aren't special in that regard.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:28 PM
1

Man, it's like you didn't even read my comment. It's pretty natural that a female-oriented site will talk about the female side of the issue. No shit, but like I said before, when male life expectancy is already lower than female life expectancy to begin with, it is far more insidious than "a female-oriented site talking about the female side of the issue." It's called being selective. It's like a male oriented site focusing solely on breast cancer in men. Doesn't make much sense.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:12 PM
2

are you watching porn to see females having sex or males having sex? This is a trick question. I watch porn to see sex. You need at least two people to have sex. Obviously, I find the female performer to be the one that is erotically stimulating, I guess you could consider the male as just a means to an end in straight sex porn shoots.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:54 AM
1

You could probably replace all the men in pornos with dildos and sex machines, and people would still eat it up. Seeing the actual act of sex is far more erotic than seeing a woman using dildos and mechanical devices. There are no creampies, etc. with just dildos. "Lesser role" doesn't mean "worthless role." Signed, A porn watching straight male.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:01 AM
3

Women on feministing focus on the female slant of things? When you complain about women's life expectancy decreasing even though men's are also decreasing plus the fact that male life expectancy is lower to begin with, it simply reeks of selective compassion and selective outrage. It's far more than a simple female slant. At the time of this post, the second-highest chain -- and highest upvoted amount -- is blatant lady-bashing. And now it's been downvoted. Quit complaining.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:52 AM
1

I see what u did there.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 01:38 PM
1

I think it all started when I was about 7 or 8 and I asked my VERY feminist 2nd grade teacher "Why does TV always say mean things about men?" and was answered with "because men are mean people, deary."
/r/MensRights21/06/11 01:37 PM
1

The funny thing is that everything you said here validates my arguments against you. You're a lawyer? Wow, even though everything you said is objectively wrong and your arguments would make even the most brainwashed denizens of 1984's Oceania howl with laughter, you still managed to pass the bar. It's probably bullshit though. You still live in your parent's basement, most likely. Wait, you're trying to argue that programs like Bridezillas are MORE offensive to men than to women? Are you high? Y…
/r/MensRights15/06/11 11:35 PM
3

This is very common in women's-directed literature too. But in the reverse. Root through your girlfriend's Cosmo's and get back to me. It's clearly a comically toned piece, and therefore the reactions, yes, are hypersensitive. I used to work in a supermarket when I was younger, and during break I sometimes read the Cosmo's on the tables when I was bored. Never, not once, did it ever say anything negative about women. The articles were either sex tips or how to avoid dangerous men/find out if he'…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 10:22 PM
3

Are you serious? Did you even read the article?? The very first sentence is "Why is it that men so often self-destruct?" Here's some other gems: "We men just make bad decisions. We can't help it. We’re men." "Women, on the other hand, do almost everything better." "We men will just make inappropriate comments, send you lewd photos and make asses of ourselves." There are many other examples. Nobody is being "hypersensitive" to these comments when they get offended by them because they are offensi…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:54 PM
2

The difference is that when someone puts forth an argument about how women are better than men at a certain activity, they use it as an excuse to say that women are superior overall and use inflammatory language highlighting the inferiority of men and trying to rub it in men's faces. I don't see the equivalent with men are better than women at a certain activity arguments.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 05:35 PM
7

Should you stay with this woman even though she caught you reading /MR and got angry about it? Would a black slave stay with a white person even though he/she caught him/her reading Uncle Tom's Cabin and got angry about it?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 04:31 AM
7

Reading that made me ill. It's amazing how even though corruption in business and government have actually gotten worse since women started joining (not suggesting a correlation), these supremacist bigots still place women on a pedestal, or shove men into the dirt, or both. I wonder if future civilizations will think of these savages the same way we think about racists, assuming this current sad excuse of a civilization survives? It's truly sad how many women think like this. Far too many if thi…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 03:53 AM
1

Nope, but don't be surprised if people call the entire movement misogynistic because of things like this. This is known as guilt by association. It's like saying we shouldn't be surprised that the KKK thinks all blacks are sub human because some blacks are gang members.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:20 AM
-1

Or if you can't be bothered to go through all the paperwork and surrounding headaches (not changing your name is the legal default and requires no work). Sorry, but I've heard from several women that the primary, if not only, reason for changing their last name is because of the headaches of NOT doing it. They say that it's easier for any kids they have and there were would actually be more paperwork during marriage for certain things because of no common family name.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 03:49 PM
3

Reversal time: She defines dead beat. And for mother's day you should beat her dead. I'd be in jail if I were to say that to someone.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 03:32 PM
1

Of course I see it, but he was trying to make it out as though it was one-sided.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 03:27 PM
2

I'm here because when I wore a dress down the main street of my little college town a few saturday nights ago, men made rude and hurtful comments towards me. Many women make fun of butch lesbians for the way they look: What's your point?
/r/MensRights08/06/11 02:41 AM
2

What's more emotionally devastating; a woman having to report a rape or letting her attacker go free with the knowledge that he might do it again?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:53 PM
0

Obviously the title was tongue in cheek.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:51 PM
2

Don't be posting here in Men's Rights, guy. Most of us refuse to succumb to bigotry that would make us little different than feminists, and will call you out for bullshit like this.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 10:17 AM
1

I lol'd at "frequently common." What, do you log all of the genuinely misogynist comments and find out which ones are trolls and which ones actually think like that, and then compare them to the total amount of comments made? I rarely see a sexist comment here that isn't downvoted, but your concerns about how this forum and the mrm in general is seen by outsiders a waste of time. The public is conditioned to see, basically from birth, something like men's rights as a misogynist scourge. It doesn…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:55 AM
0

Man, you're not a partisan hack at all.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:06 AM
1

You could go into the deepest darkest pits of the internet where all the radical MRA's and misogynists gather and you still wouldn't find shit this crazy.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:44 AM
1

I still think it's Dick Masterson trolling from the other side.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:39 AM
1

I don't consider myself scarred or mutilated from having been circumcised, but the more I hear about how removing foreskin is unnecessary and that foreskin can actually serve several important functions as an increasing number of doctors claim, the more I wish I didn't have it cut off.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:46 PM
9

LOL That moron says: "time and again angry anti-women, anti-progressive posts get constantly upvoted in that subreddit" What the fuck? No they don't, in fact those comments are usually trolls who get downvoted. Hell, the community on this subreddit does a damn better job of policing its comments than r/feminism does.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:19 PM
0

The world's not as black and white as you think it is. Just as strawman as saying democrats vote in lockstep.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:10 PM
-1

Are you retarded? LOL not all republicans are against gay marriage. It's only one issue among many, after all. It's just as much of a strawman as saying all democrats support socialism.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 11:51 PM
15

So it would seem that she initially went with this idea because she was trying to justify her sexism, but had her outlook completely changed instead. The real question is how many women are out there who believe what she thought at the outset; that men have it easier than women and thus harbor misandry due to this false belief? Of course, few people would have the luxury to change their gender for six months so they can experience reality.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:47 AM
6

A woman will always resist a man she desires Where are your sources for this? Fantasizing about being "taken" is indeed a fetish for many women, but hardwired? I call bullshit. Funny thing, actually, my girlfriend has this fetish, but since she's not insane and we both like to think of ourselves as more evolved than cave people, we communicate beforehand what we want to do. If a woman's going to secretly desire sex but not tell you about it and resist, and then hopes you rape her just in case sh…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 08:34 AM
1

You would need to video record her consent before and after as well as the sex during. Even then, I could still see that somehow not being effective.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:54 AM
2

Maybe some women do. Please don't generalise all women. It's just as bad as generalising all men. Homosexuals notwithstanding, it's true. Men like to put their cocks in women and women like men to put their cocks in them. It's called sexual biology. It's why people exist.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter