TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

truthman2000 Archive

View 72 posts and 949 comments by truthman2000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
156

truthman2000/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:05 AM
147

truthman2000/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:50 PM
98

truthman2000/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:10 PM
83

truthman2000/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:26 AM
75

truthman2000/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:42 PM
70

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:39 AM
70

truthman2000/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:39 PM
61

truthman2000/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:43 PM
47

truthman2000/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:48 PM
45

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:39 PM
37

truthman2000/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:00 AM
34

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:37 AM
33

truthman2000/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:19 AM
30

truthman2000/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:27 AM
27

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:39 PM
25

truthman2000/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:43 AM
25

truthman2000/r/MensRights21/03/12 05:08 PM
24

truthman2000/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:11 AM
22

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:31 AM
22

truthman2000/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:57 PM
21

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:46 AM
21

truthman2000/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:51 AM
20

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:59 PM
17

truthman2000/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:24 AM
17

truthman2000/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:57 PM
16

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:03 AM
15

truthman2000/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:46 PM
14

truthman2000/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:19 AM
14

truthman2000/r/MensRights26/02/12 11:20 PM
13

truthman2000/r/MensRights11/08/12 07:08 AM
13

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:51 PM
13

truthman2000/r/MensRights02/09/12 09:41 PM
11

truthman2000/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:49 AM
10

truthman2000/r/MensRights28/03/12 03:29 AM
9

truthman2000/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:43 AM
9

truthman2000/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:38 AM
8

truthman2000/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:45 AM
7

truthman2000/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:01 AM
7

truthman2000/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:43 PM
7

truthman2000/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:09 PM
6

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:35 AM
6

truthman2000/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:59 PM
6

truthman2000/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:13 PM
5

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:25 PM
5

truthman2000/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:21 PM
4

truthman2000/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:25 PM
4

truthman2000/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:07 PM
4

truthman2000/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:40 PM
3

truthman2000/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:49 AM
2

truthman2000/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:32 PM
2

truthman2000/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:21 AM
2

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:30 AM
1

truthman2000/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:33 AM
1

truthman2000/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:04 AM
1

truthman2000/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:12 PM
1

truthman2000/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:15 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:18 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:18 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:25 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:14 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:25 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:08 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:48 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:02 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:42 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:59 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:24 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:06 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:43 AM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights25/08/12 05:02 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:00 PM
0

truthman2000/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

When civilization comes crashing down, we'll be thankful for men who are masculine. Trying to do away with the masculine is detrimental to survival.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:40 AM
-1

Last I checked personal attacks are against mod policy but saying things you don't like is not.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:30 AM
1

What rule have I violated here? I'm reporting you for personal attacks.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:57 PM
3

TIL American women are oppressed. The poor dears.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:23 PM
0

And?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:55 PM
-1

That was not my argument. Try not to be so facile.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:45 PM
-2

But, but... Moderator AnnArchist says if you aren't pro-abortion, you're anti-men's rights! Don't you know the mods here know best?? You ought to stop thinking for yourself! PS the mods also believe that this post about a women's rights sub-reddit is relevant to men's rights but remove posts about how men can avoid divorce (a serious men's rights issue) with the claim they are off-topic. I'm just so glad the mods know what's best for us. /s
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:19 PM
-1

It is partly hardwired and partly influenced by environment, as with most personality traits.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:08 PM
-12

Emasculation of men is largely a social process. It is also highly detrimental to men, women, and society in general, on the whole. Thanks for the submission, OP.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:58 PM
1

That's odd, considering they consider posts that show men how to avoid divorce (a men's rights issue) "off-topic". Yet women's rights apparently are not. I wonder if "black rights" are also on-topic? After all, blacks are discriminated against as well. Perhaps "white rights" as well? I always thought this was the "men's rights" sub-reddit. Odd.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:48 PM
-1

If I have a reasonable belief that someone is smoking marijuana I should report it to the police. Oh wait, no I shouldn't, because the law is unjust. Similarly, the idea that a woman who gets drunk and has sex has been "raped" is fucking unjust.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:07 PM
-10

This has nothing to do with men's rights. Mods, please remove it. Mod policy: Off-Topic: Off-topic submissions are those that have nothing to do with Men's Rights. Generally the poster will be notified and the post removed. Off-topic posts that hit the spam-filter may be left there without notice. Note that in general posts about SRS and related subreddits are off-topic.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:56 PM
-2

none of us online are in any position to ask her details and investigate enough to tell her not to go to the cops. Sure we are. She came to us. She got drunk and had sex. It's not rape. End of story. (Of course, the OP is a troll who made up the story in the first place.)
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:39 PM
-2

She wasn't raped, as the rest of the thread makes clear.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:17 PM
-2

I wouldn't tell a woman to go report "rape" to the police when her "rape" wasn't actually rape, anymore than I would tell a guy to report his roommate to the police for smoking marijuana. The injustice system is unjust against those accused of rape, as it is unjust against those who smoke marijuana. When the laws are broken I will not contribute further to the problem by encouraging further abuse of unjust laws.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:07 PM
-9

This guy told a woman to go to the police because she was claiming rape, without even asking her the details to confirm whether the suspicion was valid. Considering a false accusation of rape can easily land a man in prison, as our "justice" system is not just, it's a terrible idea to tell a woman to go to the police just because feminists told her her stupid actions constitute rape on the part of the man. We cannot rely on the "justice" system to determine the truth. Completely irresponsible an…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:30 PM
0

lol, yes.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:00 PM
-5

No, they wouldn't.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:00 PM
4

Very true. Most people refuse to think for themselves these days. Someone mentioned the other day about a philosopher who encouraged people to think for themselves rather than read other people's ideas, because when you read other people's ideas you're really just taking on their thought patterns, rather than developing your own. Seems related.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:57 PM
-21

Legolas-the-elf, the anti-MRA.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:57 PM
-1

You don't understand cause and effect.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:56 PM
4

This is retarded.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:52 PM
1

Very well said regarding the situation and strategy. You summarized what's going on extremely elegantly. I probably should handle the personal attacks that way in the future. As I like to quote, from another MRA: The mods are behaving like women who commit DV. Their goal is to hit you enough to infuriate you, and when you lash out, to claim you're a bully. It's hilarious that for a sub that complains about passive aggression, /r/MR is ruled by it. My efforts still result in two things: a few mor…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:46 AM
2

Based on the mods' previous actions this rule appears to be utilized to censor views they disagree with from newcomer MRAs, in an effort to force their personal political ideology (radical Leftism) on the userbase. The "off-topic" category is used in much the same way. There's not much point in discussing it with them, as they do not listen to user input whatsoever, though as you've seen they are happy to pretend like they do, without budging an inch. They supposedly know better than actual MRAs…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:40 AM
-1

I'd still like a response. They are only here to troll you and to get attention and to game reddit's voting system. So are feminist trolls like VerySpecialSnowflake but you guys don't ban them. What makes SRS so special?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:29 AM
-3

Please don't use the term "trigger warning". We aren't little liberal feminist girls who are terrified of seeing something that might offend us. At least I'm not. :)
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:19 AM
7

Yes but words are basically free. Blog hosting does not cost that much money, nor do online radio shows, if the host is chosen wisely. AVfM doesn't need much money to do what they do. They require much less than they are asking for and receiving. Those other organizations need the money to be effective. There is little reason to donate to AVfM. I speak as a former donor who has seen little progress at AVfM over the last year. It feels good to donate, but it feels much better to donate when you k…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:09 AM
-1

Gareth trolls me a lot so I assure you he's talking about me. I'm not even sure why people would down-vote my comment. I've said much more inflammatory (yet equally true) things than this: Yet another indication that women are more abusive than men. Now that women have the lion's share of the power in the home, they abuse it as men never did. Yet the mods encourage down-voting and harassing me, so now there are a bunch of people like southernasshole down-voting all my posts. It appears now that …
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:58 AM
10

I suggest donating money to organizations like SAVE Services, Fathers & Families, The Innocence Project, National Coalition for Men, or even FIRE. They do real world activism and they get real results. Donating to blogs is a bit of a waste of money.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:44 AM
-13

Equal rights under the law is what got us into this mess. History demonstrates that as long as men retain power over women, civilization thrives. Once men give up their power and "liberate" women, the civilization collapses shortly thereafter. As shown in JD Unwin's Sex & Culture, 1934. Cue the down-votes for historical fact.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:45 PM
-13

Come to think of your mention of how a woman cannot respect a man who has no power over her is a HUGE argument for why arguing for "equality" is in effect arguing for female supremacism.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:37 PM
-4

Indeed. The #1 reason for divorce is women. When men had the advantage in divorce, only 5% of marriages ended in divorce. Now that women have the advantage in divorce, ~50% of marriages end in divorce. Almost all of them initiated by women. This is but one indication amongst many that when you give women power over men, they abuse it, but men do not do the same when given power over women. It probably has a lot to do with what you said about how women cannot respect men who have no power over th…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:16 PM
0

Lol. I tried the Google text only thing but it didn't help very much: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:P5sNNqnqxhgJ:www.angryharry.com/&hl=en&gl=us&prmd=imvns&strip=1 Personally I kind of like Angry Harry's layout. It reminds me of a more innocent time when content mattered more than form, and bloggers could laugh at themselves. Now it's all either extremely flashy or extremely rigid websites with fixed layouts and little character. Like the rest of the world, the internet is…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:06 PM
-1

It's good for making copies of self-posts that the mods remove even though they don't violate the rules, but other than that it's just pushing genuine discussion down further, as it is in this thread.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:53 PM
1

Oops, I accidentally erased my response. It might help that to be less incendiary, and make sure that your comments are clear and factual/logical. But that sometimes it doesn't matter if you're factual/logical, because people will down-vote based on feelings rather than facts. For example I summarized the thesis of JD Unwin's Sex & Culture the other day and was down-voted for it despite it being entirely factual based on all we know of history. It's been a good discussion with you because I know…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:40 PM
1

Well I do try to keep it factual/logical. But considering so many people on Reddit respond uncivilly to facts and logic, at Reddit it doesn't really pay to be civil all the time. Just the other day I stated the thesis of JD Unwin's Sex & Culture and was down-voted heavily and called a misogynist for it. I mean, even when I do respond saying "you guys really shouldn't down-vote stuff just because you don't like it", it doesn't do any good either. I suppose in the wider sense, people are more like…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:32 PM
1

I guess if we could come to clarity on what behavior isn't good, we could ask the mods to not do it. They would probably see how that is to their benefit, especially as it will allow them to moderate less, when they're obviously busy. Haha I feel like you're being sarcastic. This has already been suggested repeatedly and the mods ignored it. They are nothing if not arrogant. And if you've seen Gareth lately, he enjoys spending time trolling me. I think the root of the problem is most of the mods…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:27 PM
1

Yes, but also essential or we get off-track. If someone isn't going to actually listen and act no matter what you say, it doesn't really matter either way. I find a lack of integrity and honesty highly repulsive, and I believe demonstrating my disgust whenever someone is dishonorable and dishonest is moral, as it will show others that it is appropriate to show disgust at this which is disgusting. Considering we live in a world full of such people, in dire need of a change in philosophy, I think …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:19 PM
1

So, do we want moderators to be ideologically neutral? It depends on the moderators. If moderators can keep from pushing their personal ideology on the users, which is quite possible, then there's little need for neutrality or for balance in the mod team. The /r/mensrights moderators, however, have failed to do this. Not only do they disparage those who disagree with their ideology in a dishonest and irrational way, but they also specifically push an ideology on the userbase through authoritaria…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:09 PM
1

It's hard to stay polite when someone demonstrates they aren't willing to engage in an honest rational discussion. I would like to see founders of the movement like Paul Elam and Angry Harry get their place in this sub. It's not only fair, but they've mastered all the arguments. Or at the very least, the moderators should not be outright ignoring their advice or referring to them as "misogynists" simply because they disagree. Indeed, though, it would be nice to have an MRA who actually has a pre…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:53 PM
1

Celda violated the rules as described here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/102cl2/has_feminism_gone_too_far_mrahosted_debate/c6bkplr ignatius violated them here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zf0ey/proof_good_wives_are_out_there_and_how_to_test/c64yqfa?context=3 Gareth has also fantasized about changing the mod rules to ban me: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/10lqa1/considering_this_thread_is_it_fair_to_assume_that/c6f2opw?context=3 Can you explain in m…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:51 PM
1

Indeed. And there's a reason for that. Feminism is at its heart anti-traditionalism.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:45 PM
0

I'm not sure off-hand. But I bet there's a website that spits out plaintext for any website. I have a feeling maybe Google can do it. There are text-based browsers too.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:44 PM
-1

It's not so much the sex. It's that milk-baring breasts are a huge part of female identity and the female form. Regarding female identity: despite feminist and egalitarian rhetoric, women aren't valued for their brains nearly as much as for their reproductive capabilities and beauty, which breasts are tied to. Regarding female form: both men and women have brains so there's nothing uniquely female about them. Considering people care far more about problems that are uniquely female, breast cancer…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:40 PM
-7

They are only here to troll you and to get attention and to game reddit's voting system. So are feminist trolls like VerySpecialSnowflake but you guys don't ban them. What makes SRS so special?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:36 PM
0

"If you say so." Proving my point. Ignore MRAs who actually know what they're talking about, do whatever you like. Zero integrity. Arrogance. Ignorance. Same as ever. Well at least now we know for sure that you're as much a puerile sycophant for ignatiusloyola as the rest. Thanks for taking the time to respond.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:31 PM
2

it is appropriate to troll them Nope, it's appropriate to use rational arguments, not passive-aggressive childish games. Being against abortions is against mens rights. Nope. One can be an MRA and be against abortion. There are plenty here who are. You are demonstrating why the mods' inability to keep their personal politics, and social liberalism, out of the sub-reddit is a problem. We chose moderators who brought balanced, moderate views. No you didn't. The mods you added are Leftist ideologue…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:13 PM
0

Oh I probably should've linked you the thread where Factory and Gareth are discussing the Angry Harry piece: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/10kbbz/is_truthman2000jeremiahmrathingsarebad_a_false/c6efg8y
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:52 PM
1

Note that I edited my post a couple times. It seems like you didn't understand what I said. This is not a pro-life forum. I'm going to shit on that belief because that belief is morally abhorrent to me. Argue against it all you like. But given you're a moderator here, it's not appropriate for you to troll pro-male posters for expressing views you don't agree with, and it's definitely not appropriate to censor them (not saying you do though). People with traditional views can be MRAs, and trollin…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:38 PM
-1

Yes, and by that definition YOU are a bigot. All I did was point out the facts. There's no "disdain" in that statement. Just the cold hard truth. You don't agree with my views? That isn't my view, it's fucking historical fact. History demonstrates that as long as men retain power over women, civilization thrives. Once men give up their power and "liberate" women, the civilization collapses shortly thereafter. As shown in JD Unwin's Sex & Culture, 1934.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:58 PM
2

As far as I know you're socially liberal, yes? You've also mocked and harassed conservative MRAs just like the liberal mods. So as far as balance, nah. The mod team is three radical Leftists and one socially liberal libertarian who also appears to enjoy shitting on conservatives and people who dare to disagree with the mods (anyone who disagrees is "butthurt", remember?). Every moderator agrees: censor views you don't like, harass conservatives, censor or ban dissenters. All the mods are "yes" m…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:55 PM
1

Feminism was always a hate movement. Sure, they wanted change. But not good change.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:40 PM
4

I suggest you run your comments through a spell-checker man, and use proper punctuation, otherwise many of the people here are going to down-vote you even though your content is good.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:39 PM
3

Women were never mistreated when men were in charge as men are mistreated now that women are in charge. Women have nothing to complain about, as women were never "oppressed". They have always been the privileged and protected sex.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:37 PM
-4

You are a feminist, Eryemil. I call people who express feminist sentiments... you guessed it... feminists. I don't call just anyone feminists.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:27 AM
0

Good point. Basically any organization that is in favor of limiting the excesses of our bloated liberal government is an ally.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:05 AM
-4

The point is the majority of the sub-reddit is American, and we have different values than Canadians, Australians, and Europeans, countries that are even more infested with liberalism than America. Additionally, a few of the mods have anti-American sentiment, stemming from the political bias in their native countries. This is a sub-reddit composed primarily of American liberals, moderates, and some conservatives, which is run by authoritarian non-American non-activist extremist liberals who push…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:02 AM
-1

You should look up the definition of bigot. You fit that definition. I do not. Keep on down-voting the truth because it hurts your feelings, bigot.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:59 PM
-4

Because women tolerate boring, repetitive tasks better than men, while men excel more at the challenging pursuits in life. Women evolved to care for children and perform simple tasks in the home, while men hunted, warred, and built civilization. That's why men excel in STEM fields and business, while women tolerate desk jobs better.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:53 PM
-4

Yep. And history demonstrates that as long as men retain power over women, civilization thrives. Once men give up their power and "liberate" women, the civilization collapses shortly thereafter. As shown in JD Unwin's Sex & Culture, 1934.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:16 PM
-3

The mods at /r/mensrights are the same, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:14 PM
-5

if this sub wants to be taken seriously We already are taken seriously by everyone but anti-male bigots. Don't be such an ass.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:08 PM
2

Diversity is overrated.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:06 PM
1

AnnArchist, and every other moderator for that matter, is a sycophant for ignatiusloyola. You know we've requested balance in the moderation team. We were denied. It remains a team dominated by non-activist, non-American, authoritarian, radical Leftist "yes" men to the will of our supreme overlord ignatiusloyola. AnnArchist is the only one who's American and not extreme Leftist. He's a Left-leaning libertarian, not a conservative, and he doesn't regularly participate in moderation of the sub-red…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:58 PM
-2

It doesn't really matter at this point man. kloo2yoo was suckered in to ignatiusloyola's manipulation and seems blind to the fact that ignatiusloyola took over the sub-reddit and started pushing his political ideology and telling MRAs who don't agree with it to leave. Since ignatius took over the sub-reddit has had less meaningful content and fewer activists, though subscriptions have, inevitably, increased. Sadly kloo2yoo wasn't as perceptive as one might've hoped.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:56 PM
-4

More hate and insults. So juvenile.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:23 PM
0

You are a concern troll, and a poor one at that.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:22 PM
-4

Well sorry but I won't live in hatred. they should know/be shamed into knowing not to do the same to their own sons, which is a lot more helpful. Nobody has proved this is helpful overall.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:45 PM
-2

Indeed. I would actually send him links to some manosphere blogs. It was a relief for me the day I realized I wasn't crazy, I was just one of the few sane in an insane world. And there were others who also saw things clearly, who helped me to refine my ideas. Most everyone else is still in the loony bin, but at least I know what's what, regardless of what the ignorant many think about it.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:32 AM
0

If it is freely chosen, absolutely. Consenting adults should be able to mutilate their bodies as they wish. On infants? Absolutely not. So you say, but that conclusion requires certain assumptions which I do not hold to. Circumcision is the amputation of a healthy, fully-functioning and non-anomalous part of the body. And intact penis is one that is whole while one that has had pieces removed is not. There really is no argument here. There are a lot of ways in which we modify our natural behavio…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:21 AM
-3

Or, you know, you could just make a RATIONAL ARGUMENT for why circumcision is overall bad, if it is. Instead of using emotionally charged words to manipulate people into behaving the way you feel is right. While fostering resentment in individuals of their parents and other relatives because OMG you've been mutilated! It's unnecessary.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:13 AM
-5

Exactly why I argue against this crap. It's just another Leftist victimhood / hate movement. You are a victim! Your parents are bad! Resent them! Hate the system! Hate your parents! RAWR! (Fight the patriarchy while you're at it.) That's an emotional, anti-rational movement of the typical Leftist variety.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:09 AM
1

I don't particularly care for emotionally charged words designed to shut down debate. That's what you're arguing for. That's what feminists do. I won't be a part of it. I'm sure Leftists like yourself are totally on board for that kind of thing, but I'm a rational human being and I'm not joining up with your victimhood ideology fueled by resentment and hatred.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:05 AM
-8

And that's not the only difference between men and women that would lead to so many women believing they bring "special qualities" on board. Women are less rational than men. I leave it to you as to why this would contribute to a belief that they are so special.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:04 AM
-2

"Uncut" doesn't do that. See my comment here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10mnaw/on_the_importance_of_using_the_word_intact/c6ezhy0
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:21 AM
-1

I don't really think "uncut" treats circumcision as the norm. It does treat is as normal, but not THE norm. Cut and uncut can both be considered normal simultaneously. "Intact" on the other hand normalizes not being cut, and "uncircumcised" normalizes being cut.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:21 AM
0

Using the term "intact" can foster resentment in individuals who have been circumcised against the world and their parents, much like liberalism fosters resentment in people against everything else traditional. I used to be in favor of the term but now I'm not so sure. I'm not a fan of circumcision, and am cut myself, but I don't really feel like living a life of resentment.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:19 AM
5

Disagree with a woman's opinion and you're labeled a misogynist. I'd go even further. Criticize a woman or women for anything and you're labeled a misogynist. A fundamental tenet of feminism is that women can do whatever they want to do and are not to be criticized, especially by men. Else it's "misogyny" and "oppression".
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:55 AM
0

"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:51 AM
1

Take it to the meta.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:30 PM
-1

Ah, children. I can only hope you suffer during the collapse you caused.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:28 PM
-1

This belongs in the meta. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:26 PM
-1

Well this is why you are a bigot. And an ignorant one at that. You're wrong, you're a fool, and you're a bigot.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:24 PM
-1

Deluded bigots who force their "everyone is equal" silliness on others are my enemy. You are thus.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:09 PM
-1

lol are you concerned?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:51 PM
1

The-Spearhead and A Voice for Men are the sites I was referring to. The others you mentioned don't do fund drives begging for money for some obscure purpose, as far as I know. When you donate to SAVE, F&F, or Innocent Project, you know your money is going toward real world activism. And you can even join the group and do real world activism yourself, rather than just donating.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:51 PM
3

Agree. Playing at the "I'm better than you are because of whether I'm cut or uncut" game is pretty juvenile.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:47 PM
5

Yeah, I don't care for the "intact" term for the same reason. It's like "I'm intact and you're not!" It's like shaming people for being circumcised.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:45 PM
-1

I mean seriously man, you're defending the asshat who has referred to Angry Harry as a misogynist and stated Angry Harry's article is "unacceptable" here. Just so you can score a few points and not have to think about what I've told you. I wasn't rude to you, just blunt. This lack of integrity, of honor, of maturity, THAT is the real problem today.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:02 PM
-1

You're lying about me again, little man.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:41 PM
3

Some of the organizations that actually do activism: SAVE Services, Fathers & Families, and The Innocence Project. Beware, there are several other sites asking for donations that don't do any genuine activism.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:39 PM
0

You may find this interesting. The manly virtues are excellences of the male. Donovan wants to make a distinction between specifically masculine virtue (what he calls “being good at being a man”) and virtue that any “person,” male or female, can manifest (men who achieve those virtues may be “good men,” but may not be “good at being a man”). He makes this distinction in a simple and extremely clever way. He points out that there are certain qualities which we expect men to have. When we don’t fi…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:24 PM
0

Same thing.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:19 PM
-2

This is called harassment, troll.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:09 PM
-1

I'm not going anywhere, troll.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:08 PM
-2

There are a lot of bigots here.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:08 PM
-2

The ignoramus speaks from on high.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:49 PM
-1

Masculinity is not machismo. The manly virtues are excellences of the male. Donovan wants to make a distinction between specifically masculine virtue (what he calls “being good at being a man”) and virtue that any “person,” male or female, can manifest (men who achieve those virtues may be “good men,” but may not be “good at being a man”). He makes this distinction in a simple and extremely clever way. He points out that there are certain qualities which we expect men to have. When we don’t find…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:37 PM
-2

You're a pro-feminist prick. He is not.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:07 AM
-3

To be honest, equal means the same. We aren't all equal. Men and women are not the same, nor are they equal. Equality is a myth, a farce, and that myth is the very reason this sub-reddit exists. Check this out: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hegw4/if_you_wanted_to_be_treated_equally_girls_that/c1uwh67
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:04 AM
0

You really should understand Paul. Even though I disagree with your strategy and your juvenile behavior, at least I defend you when assholes try to get you perma-banned from Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10kor7/i_think_i_may_have_just_gotten_manboobz_banned/c6eb8dz That's what's called having integrity and caring more about doing good in the world than about personal grudges that have no place in the MRM. I wish you'd understand that.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:16 AM
-3

You're also a feminist. Who cares what you think?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:26 AM
0

Puerile.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:25 AM
0

Make a rational argument or shut your feminist piehole.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:34 AM
-3

Why is this a game to you? Why is your ego more important than doing what's right? Grow up. You are acting exactly like the moderators here, which is pretty damn sad.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:26 AM
0

Sadly I don't do the bidding of feminists like yourself. Equality is a farce leading only to female supremacism. That's why feminists are all Leftists.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:15 AM
1

globalism is leftist through and through do a little research buggo
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:59 AM
0

haha globalism right wing hahaha okay man keep to your delusions anyway don't falsely prefix your links with "right wing" BS and you'll get more up-votes.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:53 AM
0

do they really? it seems more like they want whatever benefits the elites pushing liberal policies to promote westernism (liberalism) I'm sure we'll disagree but I really don't see it as some sort of right wing movement I'd rather just call it globalist
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:49 AM
-1

Too true.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:46 AM
0

IMF is very limited gov Global initiative including 186 countries yeah okay
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:44 AM
1

if it's not subjective then why can't you give mea definition? of course it's subjective. there are countless different definitions. I tend to think the one that amerika.org and many other conservatives use as correct, as it's logically consistent. But if you're just going to call me an idiot because you have failed to defend your baseless assertion that the IMF is right wing, well, okey dokey.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:39 AM
3

As it will until we get new moderators who understand this simple fact: "If you let feminists, white knights, etc. gnaw away at the continuity of your discussions, when they are flat out lying or hopelessly obtuse, you diminish your potential." - Paul Elam http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/qvpb3/paul_elams_statement_on_the_moderation_policy_if/
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:37 AM
0

... I'm still asking what that means. How do you define right wing? Here's a definition I like: http://www.amerika.org/politics/an-offer-you-cant-refuse/ But I'm not sure how that fits for the IMF. Considering they are globalists trying to push a corrupt agenda, can't really call them conservatives. The terms are indeed quite subjective, sadly.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:33 AM
0

I'm not stereotyping anyone. The likelihood of finding rational people who can be swayed in a feminist group is vastly lower than finding them in a group of normal people. Regarding you. Considering you still say some really ignorant feminist-inspired crap, I don't even consider you an ally anyway, and you kind of demonstrate why it's pointless to waste time trying to recruit feminists. Most of them are hopeless. Spend time with normal people, and non-feminist groups. Best to focus on conservati…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:32 AM
0

but what do you mean by right wing?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:21 AM
4

Jailed for possession of an evil penis. Pedohysteria is a form of misandry.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:04 AM
1

what does that mean?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:00 AM
-1

lol
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:55 PM
2

Hm, I don't consider that right wing.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:44 PM
3

Mm whatever you say, globalism is a Leftist movement. If you have an article or something that makes the argument I'd love to read it and I'll keep an open mind. But you just making the assertion isn't evidence. This is the first time I've ever heard someone call IMF right wing
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:26 PM
1

As far as I know they are far left wing. Can you provide a source for your assertion? It's in the thread title... and isn't clear to me at all.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:19 PM
2

Yeah the IMF, that's the one DSK used to be president of. An extreme Leftist globalist organization from what I recall.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:15 PM
1

I don't know much about it but I didn't see anything on the wikipedia page that jumped out indicating it was "right wing"
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:10 PM
2

Right-wing? Doesn't seem like it. Seems like a globalist institution. Those are usually very left-leaning.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:03 PM
-4

See what I mean? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/10kbbz/is_truthman2000jeremiahmrathingsarebad_a_false/c6eeaet Even the moderators like to claim that piece by Angry Harry is "misogyny". Such delusion.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:30 PM
-2

Or you could just get off your high horse and stop telling other MRAs to leave simply because you're naive and don't understand the consequences of equal rights without equal responsibilities and equal disposability. Equality is a farce. edit: And here's why: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hegw4/if_you_wanted_to_be_treated_equally_girls_that/c1uwh67
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:20 PM
1

I have no reason to assume that the underlying biologically-given sexual drive is different. You have no reason to assume it is the same, and every reason to assume it is different. Women have wombs. Men do not. The evolutionary theory of parental investment suggests that because reproduction is costly, members of the sex which makes the lesser parental investment will compete for sexual access to whichever sex makes the greater parental investment. In humans and most mammals, females are forced…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:18 PM
-1

Because it's true.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:15 PM
-1

Indeed. We live in a society that is rather twisted. "Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein It's good you're able to get past your conditioning. Most people can't or simply refuse to. The problem is especially common here on Reddit, which is dominated by indoctrinated liberals who still don't get the full extent of modernity's dysfuncti…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:15 PM
-4

Yes, and you are a feminist woman concern trolling in /r/mensrights because you want more privileges for women.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:12 PM
-2

There's not much wrong with a man having a few flings on the side. Men can handle this without damaging the relationship, as women cannot.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:11 PM
0

Yes, that's my main point.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:11 PM
3

You demonize men wanting to sleep with women? And no, we haven't evolved past our nature whatsoever.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:14 PM
0

No, generalizations are absolutely necessary. The only question is whether they are accurate. Is it accurate to say that men wants lots of women? Yes, yes, it is. Men are naturally polygamous, women naturally hypergamous, in general.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:14 PM
2

Well the evidence consists of months of posts. That is exactly what they were banned for: disagreeing with the mods. I do think you're amusing. Struggling to keep the eyes off you by defending your glorious leaders. Lol. I know why they keep trolls like you around: you defend their misandry.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:11 PM
0

SRS and the like will always find something to bitch about. If we allow them to control what we say we've already lost. A lot of people like to label it "misogyny" when we make comments about the differences between men and women. They are more dangerous than any feminist because they prevent us from finding the truth and going from there. They worry more about what's politically correct than what's true, so they just replace one delusion (feminism) for another. Appreciate your comments. I tend …
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:10 PM
-2

If we don't combat against misandry and lying feminist propaganda they will continue to go unchecked. I didn't say any different. You may not see any use in debating feminists on public forums, but I do. That's not what I said. Spending your time in /r/feminism or other feminist zones is less useful than spending it in non-feminist zones.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:06 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/AboutMensRights/comments/n4lg8/rmensrights_moderator_ignatiusloyolas_habit_of/
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:02 PM
2

Reality.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:56 PM
-4

The only thing he does is try to take away from the community.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:55 PM
-5

You were being the dick with your statement about "bashing women".
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:55 PM
-4

You'd do better to focus on non-feminists than feminists as 1) they are already closer to the truth and 2) they are more likely to not be huge misandrists.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:55 PM
-3

Your time is better spent on normal people, not feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:36 PM
0

But don't worry man, the mods won't ban you. Their egos would be bruised if they banned you after I suggested it. They care more about their egos than what's good for the sub-reddit, so you're safe. No need to troll more here.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:34 PM
1

Keep spamming your troll posts, maybe people will forget about you trying to get Paul banned.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:32 PM
0

Nah. You labeled the article blatant propaganda rather than attempting to think critically about it and argue a coherent point. See ya later, don't have time for your juvenile games.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:32 PM
0

Lol if you think male and female sex drives are the same then you really can't be helped.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:29 PM
-4

My name's not Jerry. And your comment wouldn't be relevant even if it were. Keep on trollin'.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:28 PM
-1

Not related to MR? That's a lie. And my name's not Jerry.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:28 PM
-3

/r/aboutmensrights Bashing women? You mean telling it like it is about women? That men and women are different? Yeah, it's a good idea to ban someone who does that, they couldn't possibly be an MRA, no way.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:27 PM
-7

They DO ban people for dissenting opinions. As long as they're MRAs.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:25 PM
0

Trollin', trollin'.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:24 PM
0

You don't listen to anyone who disagrees with you, therefore you are an ideologue and a bigot.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:23 PM
2

I disagree that that's all it was.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:22 PM
4

Trying to get Paul Elam banned for submitting articles to /r/mensrights is quite related to the sub-reddit. Combine that with all your other anti-MRA trolling and it's been clear for months you need a banning. "If you let feminists, white knights, etc. gnaw away at the continuity of your discussions, when they are flat out lying or hopelessly obtuse, you diminish your potential." - Paul Elam
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:21 PM
-3

Of course. He's an obvious anti-MRA troll. As Paul Elam has said: "If you let feminists, white knights, etc. gnaw away at the continuity of your discussions, when they are flat out lying or hopelessly obtuse, you diminish your potential." http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/qvpb3/paul_elams_statement_on_the_moderation_policy_if/ But the mods don't listen to seasoned MRAs, they just do whatever floats their boat.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:20 PM
5

Oh gee I wonder what you were implying by claiming Paul Elam is a spammer who violates Reddit rules in a thread where a user has been banned for spamming, violating Reddit rules.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:18 PM
-5

It's called "men's rights", it is not limited to your own personal egalitarian interpretation. If all you want is egalitarianism and you want to tell anyone who disagrees to fuck off and leave /r/mensrights, then I suggest instead that you leave and head on over to /r/egalitarian where everyone will agree with you. restoring balance between women and men in the areas where they've gone too far in their quest for equality Gone too far? Yeah, another idiot claiming feminism was good "and just went…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:16 PM
0

Suffragettes were feminists. Their female opponents were anti-feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:14 PM
-8

You'd be a better mod than any we have now.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:14 PM
-1

If you need a citation for that I don't think you've had much interaction with women.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:13 PM
-1

OA making men's rights submissions is not "spamming" you asshat.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:12 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/10i38s/reasoncom_is_not_allowed_on_reddit_this_domain/c6eaqk0 Oh look it's our pal SuicideBanana trying to get Paul Elam banned from Reddit. But no, he's not an anti-MRA troll, not at all, so claim the moderators.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:11 PM
8

Lol I think you just proved zyk0s right, considering you're also a crazy feminist woman.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:02 PM
2

is the female sex drive scientifically different from males ... Yes.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:01 PM
-2

Yes, you're only allowed to criticize white religions.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:56 PM
-7

We believe in EQUAL RIGHTS REGARDLESS OF GENDER I don't. I think you're looking for /r/egalitarian.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:55 PM
-6

I'm a man, an MRA, and, thus, an equalist /r/egalitarian is thattaway Men's rights activists need not believe in the equality farce.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:54 PM
-1

Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:42 PM
-6

I don't really care what feminists think and see spending time trying to convince twisted ideologues like feminists as a huge waste of time. The men's movement needs anti-feminist men, and that's it.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:41 PM
0

Name-calling? Referring to a feminist as a feminist is not "name calling", it's calling a spade a spade. You could call me a troll if you like, but I'm not a troll by the definition of troll. SSJAmes is a feminist by the definition of feminist.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:39 PM
1

Blame the US government. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/exclusive-we-believe-that-the-usa-is-the-major-player-against-syria-and-the-rest-are-its-instruments-8082457.html
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:33 PM
-1

Pretty amusing that /r/whiterights is actually more open-minded about content pointing out white knighting in Anglo Saxon ethnic groups than /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:32 PM
-4

No, I'd rather see a reasoned argument against the content. But considering you're a feminist woman I know that won't happen. Thanks for proving the guy right, by the way.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:28 PM
-6

BattlebotStarscream is a feminist woman. I'm so surprised she doesn't like the video.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:28 PM
-7

I really care what you think, feminist woman.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:26 PM
-4

You're a disingenous puerile troll.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:24 PM
0

Says the Leftist ideologue.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:21 PM
-6

I'm not a troll, moron. And the guy who made this video is a member of the movement whether you like it or not.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:20 PM
-2

Putting you in your place isn't the point. You should be more concerned with truth and results than playing petty games to get your jollies off harassing other MRAs as if you're an /r/mensrights moderator with no integrity. If not then you aren't an activist, you're a fraud.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:16 PM
-4

No one wants to look at her nowadays anyway. She nasty.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:25 AM
-2

Honestly, I don't give a shit what you think. Then why are you responding? It's just stupid and sad that you think that there is not a single woman that can respond to rationality I never said that, idiot. Also, grow up feminist.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:03 AM
-2

Just because I post in feminist threads sometimes doesn't mean I'm a feminist. I didn't say it did. The content of some of your posts has led me to label you a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:46 AM
-7

Sadiebb is a feminist, I wouldn't listen to her. You should ask yourself, when you guys disagree about something, how does she behave? Does she demand you fall in line? Does she scoff at your input? You can't stay with a woman who does. Women should submit to their men, not vice versa.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:42 AM
-6

No, I'm referring to you as a feminist based on your posting history.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:40 AM
-5

I tend not to trust the word of feminist males like yourself.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:36 AM
-3

I'm sure you like to think that, but it isn't so.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:33 AM
-7

You're so right SSJames! All women totally respond well to rational arguments!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:26 AM
-1

Well then you're more a child than I am.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:02 AM
1

Oh and you should read this: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/09/draw-the-line/#more-1903 And this: http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/hbd-human-biodiversity/who-cares-what-women-think/ And this: http://www.antifeministtech.info/2012/08/is-it-possible-to-defend-a-male-space-without-it-being-hostile-to-women/ And this: http://curmudgeonloner.wordpress.com/2012/09/01/tits-or-gtfo-a-k-a-how-women-ruin-everything/ I know you loathe at least two of those guys but, well, they're right. An…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:40 AM
-1

Actually left-right is the only proper way to see the political spectrum. We can either go toward more leftism, or toward more rightism. Those are your two options. There are no others; even the most far-out and creative belief system is going to be going more toward one direction than the other. http://www.amerika.org/politics/unite-the-right-to-win-a-better-world-order/
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:04 AM
-1

Christianity is a precursor to leftism, if you've read the New Testament. I'd really appreciate it if you could go into more detail or perhaps link an article that does so. I get this sense from Christianity as well, but I haven't read the Bible so I'm ignorant in this area. I did a quick search and found this: Of major interest was the extremely strong thread of egalitarianism in the New Testament. Other common leftist concerns such as pacifism, social justice, racial equality, human rights, an…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:00 AM
-1

Regarding the true political spectrum: We can either go toward more leftism, or toward more rightism. Those are your two options. There are no others; even the most far-out and creative belief system is going to be going more toward one direction than the other. http://www.amerika.org/politics/unite-the-right-to-win-a-better-world-order/
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:56 AM
1

Spot on. Anyone who uses the word "misogyny" or a "-phobia" word seriously is not an ally. And believe it or not, the moderators of this sub-reddit hold the same sort of views. They're radical Leftist ideologues.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:51 AM
-1

Stay on your path all you like, but don't bash those who choose a different one.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:47 AM
-2

You advocate an impossible delusion and therefore achieve nothing.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:38 AM
0

Egalitarians deny reality and therefore are not more well-versed on anything.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:33 AM
-2

Well that's a good sign. You might find these articles of interest. Stuff to keep in mind and look for: http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenManipulateMen.htm
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:24 AM
-3

You really want to see if she's a feminist? Send her this article: http://fullofgraceseasonedwithsalt.blogspot.com/2010/02/submit-to-your-husband-as-you-do-to.html I'm an atheist myself but a woman who refuses to submit to the man who loves her isn't worth marrying.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:09 AM
-4

She is a feminist if she believes in the wage gap. Almost all western woman these days can be considered feminists. They buy the lie that men oppress women. They buy the lie that women are better than men. They buy the lie that women should have a career and slut around until they start to lose their looks and find a sucker to support them. Western women are trash.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:05 AM
-1

theory vs practice
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:02 AM
-2

Don't do it dude. You are right that this is a red flag. And let me tell you. Even the most thoughtful and rational woman will reach a point where she throws that all to the wayside. I thought I had found that 1 in 1000 girl. But spending enough time with her proved me wrong. There is really no way of knowing when or why she will change. I don't suggest marrying a western woman in this day and age. It's a recipe for disaster. The good thing is you don't have to. There is no rush for men to get m…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:01 AM
-2

Yes, it was always the case. Feminists demanded suffrage but not the responsibility to fight and die in war.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:57 AM
7

OMG do not marry a feminist, dude.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:49 AM
-14

Feminism has always been a hate movement seeking privileges for women.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:47 AM
-2

There's an interesting discussion about communism and feminism here which relates to the point you've made: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10f4tz/feminists_demand_the_right_to_show_off_their/c6dax3q?context=3
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:46 AM
-1

Fascism today is in the form of Leftism (of which feminism is one component). Leftists certainly do claim to be anti-fascist, but they are anything but.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:41 AM
0

Yeah, at least check out the first link. It summarizes Unwin's conclusion. Sex & Culture itself is a wonderful work, but it's a dense read. Worth it though. Leftists refuse to read it because they know it'll invalidate their ideology religion.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:05 AM
0

Want proof? "I am very socialist, bordering on communist." http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/knqbc/pirate_party_enters_berlin_parliament_few_women/c2lxow9 That's the head moderator harassing an MRA a year ago for not being a communist prick.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:39 AM
0

Delusion. There are a lot of people, including the moderators here, who are radical communists, self-admitted. They aren't actually MRAs, just concern trolls who rape the sub-reddit every chance they get and spend most of their time fucking with people they don't like (especially guys like me who call them on it). I even have my own down-vote brigade, which the mods perpetuate.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:36 AM
-1

Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:33 AM
-1

Which man spends more energy producing things? A horny man or a sated one? Read JD Unwin's Sex & Culture and you'll see the answer.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 09:15 PM
0

The Leftist types have to rationalize why they hate conservatism and traditionalism, so they intentionally lie to themselves that both are intrinsically gynocentric. They delude themselves into ignoring that conservatism is about getting results, and that traditional forms of society attempt to build a civilization that is thriving, stable, and productive, that benefits most men and women. Necessarily, such a society will have men in charge. Feminism, on the other hand, is all about giving women…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:39 PM
0

The mods keep her around because 1) they sympathize with her Leftist ideology, 2) they think that having dumb feminists around to look foolish is more important than making this a place for MRAs to... you know... do activism and not be bothered constantly by feminist trolls, 3) they see the sub-reddit as their personal playtoy rather than part of the men's movement.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:10 PM
0

We've had the discussion with DavidByron before. Feminism is a liberal movement, always has been, always will be. David is a liberal ideologue who refuses to accept this fact and would rather conflate conservatism and feminism, which of course is absurd. YOu won't get anywhere arguing with him. Trust me on that.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:07 PM
1

Grabepan is a feminist troll the mods refuse to ban.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:05 PM
-1

I think you're overreacting. Circumcision doesn't turn us all into reptilian monsters. Circumcision and other forms of genital and bodily mutilation are pre-historic practices, most commonly used as rites of passage to welcome men into a adulthood (such as the Masai) or to mark a certain caste (like slaves in the United States and or the British royals) or as a religious/mystical ritual. (ancient Egyptian priests, certain Australian aboriginal tribes, Jewish circumcision) Yes, and many tradition…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:54 PM
0

Thanks for linking that article. The mods are looking for any excuse to ban me so the more I link that article when it's relevant, the more likely they are going to claim I'm "spamming" "extreme misogyny" (which is what Celda labeled that article by Angry Harry).
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:41 PM
1

Gotta love liberal feminists who push this shit on us.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:31 PM
-2

So men become less emotional? That sounds like a good thing to me. We'd have to look at all the effects of circumcision though. I have a feeling circumcision was instituted to limit the influence women had over men sexually. I tend to think that's probably a good thing, as it makes men more in control of their sexual urges, and reduces women's ability to manipulate them. Less white knighting, less misandry.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:27 PM
-2

They do so because it's in women's nature to manipulate men. http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:19 PM
0

SB is just a good troll.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:13 PM
-2

women, before their rights movement, earned less/had less work responsibility because of their genes or intellect. Well, yes, that was probably part of it. Watch the following videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7MLg3bi-KY&feature=channel_video_title http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm As far as men's lower lifespan, it wouldn't surprise me if it has something to do with our genes/biology. The bigger you are the more your heart has to work, the younger you die.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:11 PM
-2

I'd like to see more details about HOW it alters the brain. If it alters in a good way, then that's a pro for circumcision. Also, you really shouldn't be subjecting infants to MRIs.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:46 AM
-2

Speaking of which, I bet if we instituted female circumcision women would live longer due to fewer sexual encounters and fewer STDs.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:41 AM
-1

Women gamers, attention whore extraordinaires.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:39 AM
1

SB does not appear to be a pure SRS-type, more like a ... who's that kind of famous troll, I don't remember his/her name. Used to troll all over reddit, was pretty prolific. SB's more the type of troll that's mostly having fun by casually mocking MRAs.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:36 AM
2

Too true homie.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:34 AM
0

There isn't much legal that can be done at this point. Well, except using a bit of game to convince her to abort the child. Oh, and of course, need to verify paternity if the child is born.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:30 AM
0

Never trust a woman who claims "she can't get pregnant". That often ends badly.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:29 AM
3

Related: Conquest’s Second Law of Politics: Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left wing. http://www.tinyvital.com/blog/2003/10/26/conquests-second-law-of-politics/
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:24 AM
0

...
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:16 AM
0

ignatius is just playing with you, getting his rocks off.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:30 AM
1

SuicideBanana? No. He/she is just a troll who wants to disrupt the sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:26 AM
0

Troll.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:11 AM
0

the only moderation those trolls need is community moderation via downvotes or replies. Nice theory but the mods censor a lot of MRAs in violation of their mod policy. I honestly would prefer they didn't do anything at all since they can't follow simple rules, though it is a bit absurd how much effort they make to NOT ban obvious feminist trolls like SuicideBanana but are so quick to censor any MRA that disagrees with them.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:41 AM
-1

I'll just quote a fellow MRA: The mods are behaving like women who commit DV. Their goal is to hit you enough to infuriate you, and when you lash out, to claim you're a bully. It's hilarious that for a sub that complains about passive aggression, /r/MR is ruled by it.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:39 AM
-1

Nobody reads the meta.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:37 AM
0

SuicideBanana? VerySpecialSnowflake? MissRepresentation was only banned because she personally insulted ignatiusloyola.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:37 AM
-1

No, here's what I said: No, I link to an assortment of sources. Many of them include peer-reviewed studies and scholarly works just like you little kids demand because you are unable to look at the world around you and see for yourself. Learn to read. If you're really deluded enough to think I'm the troll and you're not... well let me just say I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:19 AM
1

Feminists/egalitarians believe that whenever one group fails to achieve the same success as another, it must be due to discrimination and oppression, as we are all equal. Also, since we are all equal, we must treat everyone the same even if it's harmful to society (which it is). Leftism/feminism/egalitarianism is based in the lie of equality, embracing the lie that we are all equal, so as not to hurt anyone's feelings. These ideologies do not care what the consequences of embracing the equality …
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:00 AM
0

I see you haven't read it or aren't bright enough to understand it.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:53 PM
-2

I'm not much of a convincer. If people don't want to learn I can't make them.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:51 PM
3

Leftists and their censorship. :/
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:50 PM
-9

What a surprise. Anything I do link will be dismissed, as you cling to your pet ideology. Once you stop assuming that everyone with the different bits between their legs than you are "more emotional, less rational, evolved to get their way through manipulation of men in whatever way is convenient" That's not how a generalization works, idiot. You are intentionally confusing a normative statement for a universal one. G'day.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:51 PM
-7

You clearly haven't read it. It's a scholarly work from 1934 using a precise analytical methodology. JD Unwin was surprised by his results, as they conflicted with what he expected to find. Yet he was, unlike you, brave enough to publish the truth. Until you've read it, you can kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:50 PM
-6

I already linked Sex & Culture, which proves me right. It is not my responsibility to summarize it for you, and I doubt I could effectively. I can't do everything for you. I can only lead a horse to water.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:43 PM
-4

Why bother asking me? I'm only a man. Here's what Laura Grace Robins has to say about you: http://fullofgraceseasonedwithsalt.blogspot.com/2010/01/suffrage-leads-to-big-government.html
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:36 PM
-9

What, history? Truth? It's a scholarly book that proves exactly what I am saying. If you don't like it, kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:34 PM
-6

I suggest you spend a few years researching the topic with an open mind, as I have. Here are a few articles that touch here and there on the topic: http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm?note http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/02/05/understanding-the-dumb-choices-women-make/ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029265 Once you understand women's nature it's quite obvious why women abuse more often: they are more emotional, less rational, evolved to get their…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:31 PM
0

I don't make incorrect generalizations. everyone should be equal. Is vs ought. Reality vs delusion.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:28 PM
1

Truth is action. Unless you correctly identify the problem and determine a goal that will correct the problem, any "activism" is nothing more than a sideshow. AVfM routinely censors unpalatable truths, preferring instead to pander to the mainstream.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:07 PM
-17

As differently as necessary to keep civilization intact. Considering granting women social and legal equality leads to collapse of a civilization*, it is not something desirable. JD Unwin's Sex & Culture: http://groin.com/library/SexCulture.zip
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:00 PM
1

What I am saying is AVfM has chosen to sacrifice the truth to attract more followers and get more money in donations.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:56 PM
-7

No, that's not what I said. But it is certainly true that women abuse men more now that they are in power than men abused women when they were in power. Though I'm sure your feminist history says otherwise, lol. Before feminism, there was an epidemic of horrible abuse and women were oppressed. It was like living hell on earth for the poor down-trodden women, victimized by the evil bad menz.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:50 PM
-1

Close-minded? Projection.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:50 PM
-9

This is not what it indicates. It indicates that women are more abusive than men. Whether this likelihood is innate or due to environment is debatable, but usually it's a little bit of both, and I see no reason to claim women's abuse is any different. Given everything we know about the differences between men and women and how they've reacted so very differently when granted power in the home, it becomes clear that women's greater tendency for abuse is at least partially due to women's nature.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:49 PM
2

No. I said what I meant and meant what I said.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:47 PM
3

You re-phrased what I said to misrepresent what I said. You argued against the strawman you created.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:45 PM
0

I'd suggest you learn to think about the big picture but you've already demonstrates you can't. This goes back to at least 1789 and the French Revolution: http://www.amerika.org/politics/an-offer-you-cant-refuse/
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:44 PM
-16

I don't think suggesting that one sex is more abusive gets us anywhere. Yes it does. It allows us to recognize the truth: the sexes are not the same, and therefore we must treat them differently.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:44 PM
-17

It simply is.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:24 PM
0

I suggest you argue a rational point against the content for once.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:24 PM
2

No, you merely constructed a straw man to argue against.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:22 PM
-1

I think you're projecting. I'm not going to post anything in my defense because you've already proven you're a childish ignoramus who refuses to listen to anything he doesn't want to believe. The reason I didn't bother to do anything but send you a link and a quote is that I don't want to waste my time trying to find the right words to get through your shell of delusion. Those words probably don't even exist. Look at how you're reacting. Compare that to me. I'm not the one with the problem.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:19 PM
-1

I gave you an answer.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:18 PM
-2

Okey dokey.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:08 PM
-2

Average intelligence and variance in intelligence vary by race and sex, as many attributes do. We aren't all equal.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:03 PM
0

Get a new routine.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:01 PM
1

Will you get a new routine? So much stupid comes out of your mouth it's hard to believe you aren't faking it.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:01 PM
-2

Nope, I used to be a liberal. Changed my mind because I was willing to listen, take the facts and decide what made sense. You're not. You'll never grow wiser that way.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:58 PM
-29

Yet another indication that women are more abusive than men. Now that women have the lion's share of the power in the home, they abuse it as men never did.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:57 PM
1

You use the word "Orwellian" too much. Why must I repeat myself so much with you? Are you sure you can form new memories? Do you suffer from the same affliction as Guy Pearce in the hit film Memento and Drew Barrymore from the hit film 50 First Dates? You aren't an activist if you avoid discussion of goals and solutions.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:50 PM
-1

Nope. You don't treat everyone equally because they aren't equal. You're just being silly.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:47 PM
0

He actually made it pretty clear. You're just willfully obtuse.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:47 PM
-2

Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions. Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly. Einstein Good day, young prole.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:40 PM
0

Non-active? Nah. Most active? Nah. You aren't an activist if you avoid discussion of goals and solutions. edit: Let me amend my statement. You can't be an effective activist if you avoid discussion of goals and solutions.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:39 PM
-1

Nope. Treat everyone differently based on their merits, abilities, and qualities.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:39 PM
0

Again, argue against the content of the article or keep quiet. You can't really be this dense?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:38 PM
0

Oh certainly, it doesn't matter. You so much as touch a girl who's in a state where the age of consent happens to make her legally unable to consent and totally not responsible for her actions, and you go to prison.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:29 PM
-3

Feminists, like all Leftists, use the myth of equality to push their hateful ideology. On the surface, feminists claim women are equal to (or better than) men. In reality, this "equality" is only a myth they use to excuse their hatred. Feminists want privileges for women above all else. I want a stable, thriving society above all else. Feminists and MRAs who want to force the myth of equality on us want the same thing: equality, which cannot exist. They push for the same policies, and they lead …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:26 PM
-1

It's not a random comment. My point is clear. Democracy is tyranny of the masses, as treating everyone equally when we're not results in problems.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:20 PM
0

What are you talking about? You aren't arguing against the content of the article I posted.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:12 PM
-4

Sounds like feminism for men, just like Jack Donovan said: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/09/long-live-the-manosphere/ The "MRM" has sacrificed action for diversity. There is no goal, no solution in mind.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:55 PM
-2

http://www.amerika.org/politics/sopa-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-13549 Similar to what Aristotle wrote about democracy. The objective is GOOD government, not government that represents everyone. Getting everyone’s opinion is just part of the system; checks on that opinion to make government better are necessary and why there is no direct democracy anywhere in the world today. Copyright restricts freedom of speech to make a better society in the same way. Even more however, we have to c…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:47 PM
0

Has nothing to do with the article.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:45 PM
0

Again: Argue against the content or keep your trap shut. If you aren't aware, you can read the article by clicking the link at the top of the page. Then if there's something that gets your panties in a bunch in the article, you can point it out and complain about it, and if you're a really good boy you'll actually make a rational argument for why the statement in the article is wrong. Even better if you reference quotes from the article when making your points so we know what the fuck you're bab…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:34 AM
-3

Most stereotypes that come into existence organically are accurate and useful. Every race came from the same stock if you go back far enough. Not exactly, unless you're talking half a million years of evolution back in time. People of different ethnicities are - gasp - different. Kind of like how men and women are - gasp - different. The myth that we're all equal (the same) is the problem that makes this sub-reddit necessary.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:14 AM
0

I'm not really sure what turns you off, so here's a little quote from the book: As you stand back to back, fending off incoming oblivion, what do you need from the men in your group? As you close a circle tighter around dangerous game that could feed you all for a week, what kind of men do you want at your flank? Also, from a review: The central theme of The Way of Men is the definition of masculinity not as an individual trait but a social one. Masculinity according to Donovan is a sense of bei…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:11 AM
1

You are trolling this thread, yes. Argue against the content or keep your trap shut.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:43 AM
0

NAWALT!!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:43 AM
1

Also, no, I see no evidence that this article has been posted before. It was just posted on Jack's site today.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:38 AM
-1

Stereotypes exist for a reason.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:32 AM
-1

You really should consider doing something other than trolling every article by authors you don't like. Living hatefully is no way to live.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:29 AM
1

Masculinity has meaning: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/books/
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:03 AM
0

Why? Control. Cultural Marxism.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:58 AM
-2

That's nice that you think that, feminist.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:57 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/user/sibqm_lmvm
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:44 AM
-1

Education and the media promote homosexuality.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:46 AM
-4

Your posting history my feminist dearie.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:46 AM
5

Obama stopping prison rape? Ahahahaha. If he really wanted to stop that he'd end the war on drugs and the war on civil liberties. He won't. Prison rape will continue.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:45 AM
-5

O_o feminist? Really? Yup. Leftist feminist bitch. That's all you are.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:30 AM
0

Once you've read it let me know. Till then please keep your ignorant opinions to yourself.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:05 AM
0

Oh certainly, that makes sense. Indoctrination through education should certainly breed more homosexuals.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:00 AM
-2

You're a feminist woman. Kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:00 AM
2

Proving my assertion. :)
/r/MensRights23/09/12 03:58 AM
0

SuicideBanana is an obvious feminist-leaning troll the mods refuse to ban for some strange reason.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 03:52 AM
-1

Traditional cultures make it much less likely you will be stuck in such a situation, as they place men at the helm and women as submissive. Women don't bitch so much when they're heavily discouraged to. But although the chances would be much lower, such situations will always occur. Different cultures could handle them in different ways. The important thing is that overall many more people will be better served by the traditional culture than any alternative can provide. Traditionalism is the be…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:44 PM
-1

I suggest you read JD Unwin's Sex & Culture then get back to me. You've made it clear you don't have the knowledge base for us to even start to have a conversation about this.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:36 PM
-1

Who said anything about top down structures? edit: It wasn't me, it was you.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:19 PM
-1

nope
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:04 PM
0

Nope, never promoted big government, little ignoramus. I argued for traditional culture. You see, when you have a strong culture, you don't need such a big government. We have demonstrated why there is going to be a collapse/decline. A society where man have no reason to produce value cannot sustain itself.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:01 PM
1

Asking the gov. to interview and force women to chose beta provision ... is just idiotic. I agree. Asking the government for anything is idiotic. Your whole premise is based on convincing the government to do what you want. You're destined for failure. Don't engage me in the style of an immature woman No, I was engaging you in the style of a man speaking to a child, actually. There is a subtle difference. You cited fucking femininebeauty.info. Jesus.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:53 PM
-14

I am not a troll.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:46 PM
3

Ooh citing femininebeauty.info, thanks so much I'll be sure to head right over. "Sex and Culture" by J.D. Unwin - it is the "limitation of sexual opportunity" which creates the "mental energy" necessary to build a civilization. http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/08/online-book-sex-and-culture-by-jd-unwin.html http://groin.com/library/SexCulture.zip Traditionalism is about limiting the sexual opportunity of both men and women, especially women, to compel men to focus their energy on society. Monoga…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:40 PM
-1

It doesn't matter. As Bobsutan stated, technology doesn't stop the collapse.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:10 PM
1

Whoosh right over your head.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:57 PM
0

technology has negated the relevance of it What are you smoking?
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:55 PM
0

You also shouldn't base a relationship on whether or not someone's been married. Yes you should.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:44 PM
1

More like the Democrats, actually. After all, lazy people are the ones looking for handouts.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:33 PM
0

You are a joke.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:16 PM
28

Yes, technically you are a rapist now. Females are not accountable for their actions, only you are. Just as when a 16 year old lies about her age and you become a rapist because you thought she was 18.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:12 PM
0

lol
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:19 PM
0

There's no point in saying don't LET a woman get a drinking habit. If someone is going to put their self in that state or make a habit of it they will do so regardless of what you think. Well, what I mean is don't ever stay with a woman who has a drinking problem. I'd also be averse to cohabitating with one who has had one in the past. Leaving or calling the cops at the very first incident of violence would have been better choices. Calling the cops as soon as she pushes over your TV? It seems w…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:18 PM
0

And like you said in your article: Now quite honestly, I 've been called a "misogynist" so many times -- on no clearly demonstrated warrant whatsoever! -- that it rolls off my thick patriarchal back like a raindrop off the face of Half-Dome or El Capitan! In the real world, virtually ALL usage of the M-word, ever, at any time, by anybody whomsoever, is inherently moronic. That's right. I claim that most of the people who toss this word around for any reason at all, under any condition bar none, …
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:52 PM
0

As I predicted, Celda backtracked. By refusing to say exactly what was "misogyny" about the links I provided, he has an "out" any time one of the MRAs shows up where he can claim "I only meant the OTHER articles were misogynistic, not yours." Celda is still using the word "misogyny" to describe Angry Harry's article for daring to make negative generalizations about women, and Demonspawn's post for daring to admit that men and women are not equal. I suggest you investigate the content of the othe…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:41 PM
-21

Yes, this is where she blames me for being insensitive, and when I refuse to apologize, she smashes my TV. doch_doch, proving AWALT yet again. You seriously need to shut the fuck up, you retarded piece of shit. Typical abuser mentality. My ex used to tell me to "shut the fuck up" when I was making her angry for whatever reason too. It was like she'd transformed from a normal girl into this slavering beast with fury in her eyes, ready to hurt me. I sense the same emotion in doch_doch's reply.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:35 PM
-20

Says the feminist.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:20 PM
-12

AWALT given the proper circumstances, as I said. See the following thread: http://www.mgtowforums.com/forums/mens-general-discussion/8774-awalt-nawalt-awalttvd.html There's no point in distinguishing between MWALT and AWALT. There is no way of knowing when and if a specific woman will become like that, so it's necessary to treat them as if AWALT.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:20 PM
1

Then don't ask for it, troll. And don't pretend you want to hear views contrary to your preconceived, ignorant notions.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:54 AM
2

That's an extremely facile way of looking at things.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:54 AM
7

A male feminist told me that us MRA's should discuss what we think we should do about the homophobia that is so very prevalent in men. I always do what feminists tell me to.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:05 AM
-58

Had a similar experience before. Sadly, AWALT, given the proper circumstances. My first piece of advice is never let a woman get a drinking habit. They simply cannot handle it. Also think about WHY women tend to destroy men's property. It's because they project. They know that they value you for your property, so they assume your property is what you care about most too. When you don't respond crazily to this destruction of property, they lash out with the next thing that comes to mind: physical…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:56 AM
-1

It's not his first day here.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:50 PM
-1

No problem. I don't mean to cause drama but I do want people to be aware of this type of behavior when it goes on.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:36 PM
0

Here is a summary of what occurred. Celda's OP stated the following: I encourage other MRAs in Vancouver to attend as well. If you do, please be respectful and rational. We don't need any "women = gold digging sluts" "feminists = nazis who want to castrate all men" that do nothing except make MRAs look foolish. In response to his rather condescending statement about MRAs, I posted something along the lines of the following: We don't need any "women = gold digging sluts" "feminists = nazis who wa…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:23 PM
0

I see.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:33 PM
0

I suggest you respond directly to Celda, though judging by his behavior thus far he will either ignore it or downplay it in some manner.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:32 PM
0

Yup, science. Sex & Culture, written in 1934 by JD Unwin, using a methodical analysis of historical and anthropological data. Read the book.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:48 PM
0

Makeup is a form of deceiving men about how attractive a woman is.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:30 PM
1

The use of any "phobia" term is generally wrong. Homophobia, transphobia, androphobia. Usually these have nothing at all to do with fear. Misandry is a more useful term, though not perfect.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:30 PM
0

TIL JD Unwin's scholarly piece Sex & Culture is tripe. I learned this from the amazing Redditor known as 0bvious_Atheist.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:05 PM
-2

I advocate for traditional values but am open to consideration of some slight modifications to improve the traditional system. I am for sex roles, male dominance, and probably monogamous marriage. History shows that when women are granted equal legal and social rights it results in the dissolution of monogamous marriage which was what gave men an incentive to produce and caused the society to thrive. Shortly thereafter the society crumbles. History also shows us that monogamous marriage doesn't …
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:47 PM
0

I don't remember where I read that, but it makes sense. You might look for articles that discuss women's psychological differences and then compare these to feminism's strategy. Here's a good article by MRA Angry Harry about the nature of women: http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:41 PM
2

That's because feminism is merely an extension of the worst of female psychology put into political context.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:35 PM
0

Do you have anymore info on this? I'm of the belief that Christianity has failed us in many ways. On the other hand, I look at the resistance of Muslims to globalism/Leftism, and I admire it. But I don't know enough yet to draw conclusions.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:38 AM
1

See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/106zsi/vigilante_hailed_as_hero_for_killing_man_who_had/c6b6d5u?context=1
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:35 AM
0

Well said. All in all, I'd summarize it thusly: Leftist activists pushed these ideas. Conservative proles adopted them in ignorance. They knowed not what they did.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:35 AM
1

Certainly the root of this male sex hysteria is in Leftism. There were many "conservatives" who fell in line, fooled by the Leftist activists who pushed these policies. But the fault still lies with the left.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:33 AM
0

I want a society that thrives, where men can have families that love them, a society that can defend itself, and doesn't go downward into dysfunction. Only traditionalism provides for that. It isn't perfect, but it is the only option available if you want a society that doesn't just die out. The goal of MRAs should be to work on a form of traditionalism that is better than the forms of the past. But if you want your 50% divorce rate, children born without fathers, and widespread misandry, well, …
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:31 AM
2

Just an FYI, imbecile is an elaborate troll. His intention is to waste your time.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:24 AM
-3

Thanks, Leftism/feminism, for promoting this hysteria.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:54 PM
18

I have no idea why it's so widely accepted by the media and the general public. Feminism's basic premise is that nobody can tell women what to do.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:51 PM
1

Not really lol.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:23 AM
5

Anti-feminism gives us a bad name? Please. Feminism is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:53 PM
-4

Equal means the same or it has no meaning at all.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:53 AM
1

Very well. I will be informing the above listed men's rights activists that you believe the above statements and article links are "extreme misogyny", so that if they come into contact with you in the future they know of your position. Normally I wouldn't bother but considering unlike the other moderators you could be called an activist, and it's possible you may want to work with some of these MRAs in the future, I feel it is appropriate. Not only was it misogynist, but it was pretty irrelevant…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:25 AM
-1

Also, Cel, I have to ask: Were you the one who initially removed the post? If so I would appreciate an apology and a promise to be more careful and forthright about what you remove in the future.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:13 AM
-2

I did not post any such thing. Angry Harry is an MRA. So is Demonspawn. And Fidelbogen. And Laura Grace Robbins. Perhaps you should ask them each if they believe their statements are "extreme misogyny".
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:43 AM
4

I have not spammed. I have merely reposted my comment as an act of civil disobedience, considering you have removed it against your own moderation policy. Grow up. Since you yet against deleted my post on a whim and simply because you didn't like it, I will repost it here so that others can verify it does not violate any rules: Reposting again since the childish mods continue to delete my post despite it having violated no rules. The post is relevant to demonstrate why worrying about "mithoguhne…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:40 AM
-2

Generalizations are fine as long as they're accurate. As I've told you repeatedly. That's the difference between my generalizations and feminists'. Go white knight elsewhere. edit: Oh, and read Sex & Culture. You have no excuse not to. It's scholarly so I'm sure you'll love it. Beware, however; he makes generalizations about human culture based on historical and anthropological research.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:36 AM
-1

lol The delusion runs deep in them.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:14 PM
-1

it's equally important that both genders Nope, it's not equally important for women to avoid fellatio as it is for men to avoid cunnilingus. Sorry, the world isn't equal, life ain't fair. Please stop promoting delusion.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:07 PM
3

For Leftist egalitarian pseudo-MRA feminists, it is.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:01 PM
0

It's especially good advice or it's less especially good advice. Men and women are not the same. Penises and vaginas are different. It's not wrong to state the fact that cunnilingus is riskier than fellatio. It may seem wrong when you believe in the lie that we're all equal and the same and oh boy we better not offend women by stating these facts, but we're not equal. Sorry. Men and women are different. If you think I'm being biased against women by stating the truth I invite you to join up with…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:51 PM
0

Sweeping generalizations? Sounds like what a feminist would say to me. Believe it or not there are stark differences between the male and female sexes which, if we do not note them, mean we shall never solve the problem of men's rights being eroded.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:51 PM
-11

PS do you know one of the primary reasons women can't handle combat? They get infections of the vagina very easily. Many men have a natural aversion to cunnilingus, which is only natural considering the vagina is prone to infection. The penis, not so much.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:32 PM
11

I've already outlined the differences. Mucous membrane, greater transmission. Hidden infections more likely. Thus cunnilingus is riskier than fellatio, generally.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:28 PM
0

It is especially good advice for anyone who is considering licking a mucous membrane that is more susceptible to infection and whose owner is less likely to know about infection, infection that causes CANCER. Fellatio and cunnilingus are not equal any more than men and women are. Cunnilingus is the more dangerous of the two.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:27 PM
-3

Indeed, indeed.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:21 PM
-5

Are you still arguing that women and men are the same? Oh geez. Right, there's no biological basis for male and female differences whatsoever. Men and women have the same muscle mass, height, and gray matter amounts. We're all the same, except SOCIETY. What a stupid idea.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:09 PM
-4

There's a reason I have you marked as a feminist troll. "gynophobic" - Jesus
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:09 PM
1

Yes, but it is especially good advice for men. There's a reason many men are naturally disinclined to perform oral sex on promiscuous women. I believe it is largely rooted in the subconscious, a notion we evolved through experience over the ages.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:16 PM
-5

Human nature embraces entitlement complexes. Women's more than men's. When men were in charge in the home, they treated women and children fairly. Now that women are in charge in the home, not so much. Women evolved to manipulate and use men. Men evolved to provide for and lead women and children. So this statement is patently false, as history demonstrates quite clearly: Men would behave in the exact same way, if they were given the same privileges, or the same freedoms, that women are given.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:44 PM
41

The truth is oral sex on a female is less sanitary and more dangerous than oral sex on a male. A great deal of men are getting throat cancer because of HPV they receive from giving oral sex, which is more easily transmitted through a mucous membrane and often goes unnoticed by women who have it when it is internal. I do not recommend men give oral sex to women unless they are in a monogamous relationship with a woman who has been tested STD-free.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:07 PM
0

Nah, there are your innocent sheep and there are your hardcore evil ideologues with an agenda. Chavelah is one of the latter. Smart enough to know what they're doing is wrong. Like Obama lol.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:28 PM
1

It's all connected. Based on the research I've done it's clear that when women no longer fall under the dominion of men, society goes in the crapper. The truth is men are more responsible when they are in power. Now women are in power, and not so much. There's also a strong correlation with liberalism, egalitarianism, the idea we're all "equal" (though some are more equal than others). And multiculturalism. My conclusion is that women are innately different than men in a way that guarantees when…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:26 PM
0

chavelah is a Leftist feminist and a very bad person. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:16 PM
1

Not as much as interaction with a sexy man can impair a woman's. :) Ever see a crowd of One Direction fans? Or if you fuck your girl right before she heads out the door for work, and she's still in a mental fog and runs into the side of the garage breaking the side mirror off? I've always found it amusing how women's minds go blank when they're getting off sexually. One of the funny things I used to do is ask them a question and then when they tried to answer it I'd finger them a little, and the…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:08 PM
0

You're just seeing the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the truth. Every society we know of which has granted women legal and social equality has collapsed within three generations. - JD Unwin's Sex and Culture (1934).
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:05 PM
-2

Most women are like that. Deal widdit.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:03 PM
4

The problem is two-fold. On one hand feminism pushes the female entitlement complex. On the other hand, women's nature embraces the female entitlement complex. Feminism is merely an extension of female psychology put into political context. Women's survival strategy has been to manipulate men to get them things: http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm. Feminism just promotes this behavior through state force and indoctrination in our schools. Feminism is the natural consequence of women's…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:00 PM
0

Well said. This article touches on what you are talking about: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/102xqq/equalitys_a_bitch_aint_it_girls/ The problem is that Reddit is full of liberals who still believe we're all equal, and they value this childish idea more than they value the truth or men's rights. They want feminism for men, where we all get together and pretend men and women are the same, promote androgyny, and sing Kumbaya. And there are some "MRM" sites that are the same way. But …
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:58 PM
-1

If you're seriously going to argue that women are as or more rational then men, then you haven't been paying attention to the world around you. But here's a scholarly article which I'm sure you will find an excuse to dismiss that demonstrates women are more emotionally unstable than men (and thus less likely to react to conflict rationally rather than emotionally, therefore proving my initial statement that women do not respond well to reasoned arguments): http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:50 PM
5

The truth is insulting? Too bad. The article also isn't just about "pua". It touches on some serious men's rights issues throughout.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:39 PM
-5

First Chump.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:37 PM
1

Judging anyone based on their sex in a "general" way is practically the definition of sexism. Certainly that is an appropriate definition, but that's not how you were using it. I'm accusing you of being a white knight because you are defending women en masse against factual statements about their general character. That's white knighting. In case you didn't know, men and women are not the same. They are not equal.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:30 PM
1

It is generally true that women do not respond well to reasoned arguments. You are a white knight. Feel free to stay, but try to be a little more mature.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:18 PM
-2

It's not sexism if it's true.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:07 PM
1

Generalizations are valid.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:07 PM
1

your telling the truth. Which is exactly why I was down-voted.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:07 PM
1

Women.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:17 AM
26

She later went on to blame MRAs for the harassment and claimed she fears for her life, on Jezebel.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:49 AM
-6

You made two mistakes. 1) You tried to talk to a woman about men's issues. 2) You tried to convince a woman with logic. Neither of these behaviors is likely to be productive.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:42 AM
-12

We don't need any "women = gold digging sluts" "feminists = nazis who want to castrate all men" How about these instead? Feminism is a hate movement. Men and women are not equal. Women are the schemers, the phonies and the frauds. Women should submit to their husbands. End women's suffrage.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:30 AM
-1

You've clearly decided on an ideology that appeals to you and are backwards rationalizing why it's good for everyone else. "Male disposability" is your excuse for promoting a system that would personally benefit you.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:22 AM
0

I must say it's interesting to watch your rationalization hamster spin.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:35 AM
0

This is why I always recommend the pull-out method followed by urination between orgasms. Done correctly it is as about effective as the pill, and YOU are in full control. Never trust a woman to take birth control.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:43 PM
-11

Who is a man more likely to rape? A woman in a burqa or a slut in a skimpy skirt? Don't dress like a whore and you won't get advances you don't want. Pretty fucking obvious.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:25 PM
0

Why would I take the time to re-write what others have already said far better than I ever could? I'm not that eloquent. You're even less so. I try to learn from others. You clearly don't want to.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:42 AM
1

Important stuff.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:39 AM
-5

"Feminist friend" is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:35 AM
1

You aren't really listening because you have an ideology you're not willing to question, which is typical. Aren't we enlightened? Allow me to leave you with a relevant quotation from JD Unwin's Sex and Culture, published in 1934 (sorry for the copy errors): The notion of an ever-increasing cultural process has been encouraged by our -own attitude to our own-peculiar culture. There is reason to believe that in some ways- our own culture is incomparably richer than that of any previous 'known cult…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:29 AM
1

There is plenty of information in the FAQ about why feminism is anti-male and anti-men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:30 AM
2

Haha, that's a good impression of the mods. Have you seen what they've been removing lately despite it not violating mod rules? I made a little meta post linking to the moderation log and then iggy went on a tirade about how I'm a Republican or something.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:52 AM
1

Thus spake feminist.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:50 AM
1

I think when I labeled you a feminist concern troll I was right to do so.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:52 AM
5

But feminists and Leftists agree: taking tax dollars from men to pay for women's sexual adventures is important. To them, this is "healthcare". What, men die five years earlier than women? Meh, not important.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:49 AM
1

btw i updated my latest reply to you
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:30 AM
1

conservatives want to conserve the status quo (i.e. they support current power structures or want to restore recent power structures) No, that's not the case. Conservatives do not want to support the current status quo, not when the status quo is what it is now. Already stated what conservatism is. An overthrow of government by the right is a putsch: it comes from established power structures. No it comes from conservatives through violence against the established government. Well, sometimes. It…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:26 AM
3

All women are like that given the proper circumstances. As long as society gives her such power over you, there is absolutely no way to know whether or not she will end up being like that at some point in the future. There is no way to protect yourself cohabitating or in marriage or having kids, other than leaving the country and finding a wife abroad. The West is no place to find a long term relationship.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:23 PM
1

Ah, the feminization of language.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:55 PM
0

I can quote mayonesa: It seems to me the polarity is very clear: the right is inclined toward hierarchy and society as a whole, and the left is inclined toward individual rights and nothing else. Jonathan Haidt provides a comprehensive viewpoint, in which there are six axes of concern, three of which are important to liberals and six of which are important to conservatives: http://chronicle.com/article/Jonathan-Haidt-Decodes-the/130453/ And also: They see the leftist view: individuals should be …
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:45 PM
3

Everything about masculinity is primitive, dontcha know? Men are supposed to be good little girls who play nice and cooperate. Competition is bad, aggression is bad, naughty language is bad. Don't say things that might be hurtful even if they're true. Grow up and be a good little obedient girl for your masters! If you don't, you're just a primitive immature MAN.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:33 PM
1

So dumb.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:32 PM
2

Nope, that's not how generalizations work. They are implied. If someone is stupid enough to confuse a normative statement with a universal one, it's their own fault. ME: Men have penises. YOU: WHAT?!?!?!? But there are some men who don't have penises!!!!! BIGOT!!! YOU CAN'T SAY THAT!!!!
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:17 PM
3

We didn't win the lottery, we earned it.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:17 PM
2

I found another quote, this time from Ernest Belfort Bax: "Such facts are the pathological mental condition peculiar to the female sex, commonly connoted by the term hysteria; the absence, or at best the extremely imperfect development of the logical faculty in most women; the inability of the average woman in her judgment of things to rise above personal considerations; and, what is largely a consequence of this, the lack of a sense of abstract justice and fair play among women in general." - B…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:00 PM
2

Haha, no. Generalizations are generalizations, extremely useful as long as they're true. And they don't need to apply in EVERY SINGLE CASE to be true for most cases. Sheesh. edit: Let me add that if we can't generalize then we can't say anything about any group of anything, which is a pretty silly way to go about things.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:58 PM
-1

I care about a thriving, stable society that reproduces and can defend itself first and foremost. Leftists like to claim that the #1 important thing is the individual and nothing else matters. If that belief harms society, then clearly it is not correct. This is the bias of modernity. edit, expanding on my point: Before you can determine what's optimum you need a set of weighted goals. For example I would give priority to the civilization maintaining itself and being able to defend itself first,…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:48 PM
2

Concern troll is concerned.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:37 PM
1

First it was evidence, now it's proof. I'm not really interested in arguing with a user who can't think for himself, doesn't understand the difference between a normative statement and a universal one, and constantly shifts the goalposts. See ya!
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:27 PM
-1

if one person has more wealth and power than the maximum socially stable group of the poorest people, he can distort the whole social fabric of such groups almost at will. And they assume that is a problem and therefore "not optimum"? This confirms what I thought: the biases of the modern world are too strong for "science" to come to any useful conclusion about what an optimum balance is.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:26 PM
2

The simple fact is that not all women do that. The exception that proves the rule. You can't take any personality trait and apply it to all members of a group that is defined by birth. It's called a generalization.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:23 PM
2

"The concept of honor is a male abstraction." Too true. I've read as much many times in the manosphere. It may come from Schopenhauer. I found this quote: “As Schopenhauer and Weininger will tell you, justice is something women are particularly wretched at.” Schopenhauer is the best gender realist in the pantheon of Western philosophy. Most of us understand justice to be something that must be “harsh” at times. It’s not hard to see why women fail to emphasize it in the same way as men do. It’s t…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:58 PM
2

Anger management is a feminist code word for "this guy doesn't respond well to women's psychological abuse, why is he so angry? There must be something wrong with him because she's a perfect angel and can do no wrong. Let's fix him." I wouldn't use "anger management problems" as any sort of indication of actual problems in men. If you put all the pieces together, everything points to women being more abusive than men. You have to look at the big picture, and every piece of information available,…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:24 PM
1

I actually do have history to back up my assertion. But let's talk about you. I really don't think it's a good idea for you to go around insulting users just because they're more knowledgable than you, do you? If you disagree with something so strongly, feel free to provide some evidence for your assertion. But there's really no need for this hostility, and it doesn't reflect well on the sub-reddit. Think about it.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:21 PM
0

And there is actually a pretty good scientific understanding of where the optimum is. My butt there is.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:34 AM
3

And women grow penises and beat men in the Olympics too.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:33 AM
1

Juvenile. Merely proving my point.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:02 AM
3

MRM may make the legal system more fair, but that’s all it will do. It will make divorce sting less, it will remove affirmative action to allow fair employment competitions, and it may do some other good things, but it is still based on progressive ideas of equality, fairness, human rights, social justice, and all that jazz and is still corrupt. In the long run it merely preserves the corrupt system, but blunts its edges, reducing consciousness, fixing the system further in place. http://freenor…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:00 AM
3

Nice rebuttal. Furthermore, what you and Paul Elam are advocating for is merely perpetuating the current status quo. Not surprising as you are openly feminist, but surprising when you consider that Paul claims not to be. From the OP: If the feminists at The Good Men Project were capable of admitting that women were capable of doing wrong, and the feminists at A Voice for Men were capable of admitting that they are feminists, they could probably work together to help men get better treatment from…
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:59 PM
0

No, this is what changes societies.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:55 PM
2

You must have a goal for your activism to accomplish. Paul Elam's goal is feminism for men. It is not compatible whatsoever with my goal: no feminism at all, traditional sex roles that make sense. Paul Elam believes, among other things, in actual activism on the streets -- something no other part of the manosphere wants to deal with. Activism toward what end? There is no end. There is no discussion of goals or solutions allowed. Just "fight the power!" That's not activism, it's busy work. The ma…
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:26 PM
-5

I wouldn't group all women as that But that's always been women's survival strategy: manipulate men to provide for them. http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm Feminism didn't sprout out of nothing, it is merely women's normal personality put into political context and pushed to an extreme extent. Feminism exists because it reflects what women are truly like when they have no standards for behavior.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:14 PM
2

They'll only recognize reality when it bites them in the ass.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:12 PM
20

Lol, really, women are complaining about how they're treated in the family court system. Just goes to show you no matter how much they beat men down, no matter how many privileges they get, women will still find something to complain about.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:57 PM
1

Only when they're forced to by reality I think.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:51 PM
1

Not when their bigger picture is pushing Leftism and stroking their control fetish.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:28 PM
2

Certainly, but the mods seem to prefer to use it as their personal playground.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:21 PM
38

When men had the lion's share of the power in the home and public sphere, they showed care for women, for children, and for society. Now that women have the lion's share of power, they show care only for themselves. Funny how that works. It's almost as if men and women are different.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:10 PM
2

Yet another indication women are more abusive than men.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:52 PM
1

No, feminists pushed the ideas on ignorant conservatives and they bought it hook line and sinker like everyone else.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:51 PM
1

The only thing I've seen the mods ban for is disagreeing with them.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:47 PM
3

And all the r/mensrights mods are Leftists :)
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:46 PM
1

Removed.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:40 PM
1

Good posts, extremely relevant, too bad the mods removed it for no real reason.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:38 PM
1

blah blah troll troll
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:29 AM
-4

That's all you do, little man. It's all you've ever done.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:28 AM
0

How am I anti-woman? Where in the world have I said I'm against women? Are you whining about misogyny in r/mensrights? Oh no, you special little angel! Are your feelings hurt?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:09 AM
0

Only misandrists like Cecile Richards, the National Women's Law Center, and Sigil1 can whine about women's "healthcare" (birth control paid for by men's tax dollars) while men die 5 years earlier than women.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:07 AM
0

I didn't actually read what you said. What's the point? Read the entire thread here and you'll see MY point.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:04 AM
0

That's nice.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:03 AM
-6

So do the mods here....
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:03 AM
1

Feminist troll?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:54 AM
0

Oh God, people who are too stupid to understand subtleties of the language and context amaze me. I can't imagine being so dumb.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:52 AM
-2

I never said that. I said women are inherently more likely to abuse. Why do idiots always twist my words?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:41 AM
-2

Confused, morons, blah blah. You're nothing but a troll, a troll who's refused to learn anything over the past two years while he's been busy whining about generalizations even when they're accurate. Fuck off, mangina idiot.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:41 AM
-11

Sasha Grey is just a slut, she would've been a slut whether she was paid for it or not. Good on her for making some cash from being a slut, I guess. I've benefited personally from her sluttery a couple times myself.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:38 AM
8

divorce reform is all about redistributing power from the husband who wants to honor the marriage vows to the wife who doesn’t.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:29 AM
1

Here's a start: http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/ Men are powerless to stand up to their wives these days. If he scolds her, it's abuse. If he doesn't want her to buy a pair of new shoes they can't afford, abuse. She can divorce him and take his money, he has no recourse. She can steal his children, he has no recourse. She can claim abuse and he is immediately arrested. It goes on and on. A husband remains a husband at his wife's convenience. Women initiate 90% of divorces. A man gets to see his…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:55 PM
-4

I'm not assuming anything. Women are in control of the household. They have ALL the power in the home. That is a simple fact. The law is on their side, society is on their side. Use your brain, that's what it's for.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:40 PM
1

Racist.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:38 PM
-1

Women are the same the world round. The only difference is whether the culture allows and encourages women's naturally abhorrent behavior. Western (feminist/Leftist) culture does not place restrictions on women's natural behavior, and so women in these countries are just terrible. Traditional cultures, on the other hand, keep women's nature in check, and women are tolerable.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:24 PM
-2

Says the crazy strung out uptight basket case feminist American woman....
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:23 PM
27

The only things that are creepy are Britney's face and Demi Lovato's voice.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:17 PM
3

Feminism is merely an extension of women's nature. You're the only one trolling here.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:10 PM
-3

One is to have women's autonomy limited by law, as happens in Muslim countries. That is really the only solution. Best if it is religious law.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:08 PM
-1

See for yourself, genius.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:07 PM
3

You need a traditional male-dominated society to keep women's nature in check. We had that, but men's manginatude compromised it. So in the future it would be a swell idea to put controls in that prevent us from accepting feminism/Leftism again and destroying our civilization. The Garden of Eden scenario seems to play out again and again. After The Fall there have been mini falls; crossroads at which we could choose to obey God, through man, or choose the path of the serpent. The very nature of …
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:03 PM
-1

Even most women who believe they don't want to take on traditional roles (because they've been led to believe this by feminists/Leftists) actually would be MUCH happier in such roles. A lot of them only learn this when they're 35+ and realize that riding the cock carousel for two decades wasn't worth the sacrifice of never having children.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:01 PM
-1

nope
/r/MensRights08/09/12 09:59 PM
-1

I do nothing but state the truth as I understand it. On the other hand, you're an abuse apologist looking for every excuse to disregard women's abuse and blame it on anyone but the abusers themselves. Disgusting. If we refuse to be honest about why women abuse more, we will never solve the problem.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:56 PM
2

Yeah, I'm the close minded one.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:55 PM
-10

Perhaps that's just that nature of it? Yes, it's the nature of women. edit: Hide that truth you brave soldiers of misandry!
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:49 PM
1

Oh I see, so women are physically different but magically perfectly equal to men mentally. That makes a lot of sense. [citation needed] Is that a joke? You're not arguing that women are equal to men in STEM as well? That women and men have the same population variance in intelligence. God, ideologues are fuckin' retarded.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:43 PM
-8

Yes. Women are more likely to have abusive, sadistic personality types. If that weren't the case, why did men treat women and children so much better when they were in power, but women treat men and children like shit now that they are in control? News flash, men and women aren't the same, and women are more abusive than men. Refusing to acknowledge this is refusing to deal with the problem.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:33 PM
0

Impossible, without something akin to pol pots year zero. Restoration of traditionalism requires the necessary correction of collapse of the current dysfunctional civilization, which is inevitable. And asking the state to force women to be with men they are not attracted to ... the men that would want that are as bad as the most grovelling manginas. What the fuck are you babbling about now?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:17 PM
-1

Thank God, I'd have to beat you constantly to knock a little sense into you. :) Also, that poster is not "obsessing" about women, he is talking about them. Believe it or not, whether AWALT is an extremely important to MRAs. If you had a head on your shoulders you might understand that.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:06 PM
1

No. G'day.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:04 PM
0

Yesterday's system. Traditionalism.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:04 PM
0

Talk about != obsess. Grow up child.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:01 PM
1

I'm sure it does but you'd want to consult a lawyer. You'd need to see if involving CPS will help or hurt you. etc.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:00 PM
3

You didn't guess how much my healthcare costs. Let me tell you. It costs me as much as I want it to cost because I have the individual right to make my own fucking choices you anti-liberty retard. PS please learn the definition of "shill", you aren't using it properly. G'day!
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:51 PM
3

Lol. You've met your mental roadblock. Guess how much my healthcare costs me right now?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:45 PM
3

The absurd healthcare costs in the US are due to government interfering with the free market. Government is waste. Those who think government is the answer to everything are naive and ignorant, nothing but useful idiots. Your buzz words amuse me, by the way. Can't help but repeat the spin you've been fed, can you? Ah, useful idiots, so unique and smart, every one, saying the same things they've all been told to say.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:40 PM
5

Ah, useful idiots, fucking it up for the rest of us one ignorant statement at a time.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:29 PM
1

Yeah keep calling transfer of wealth from men to women to fund women's sexual escapades "healthcare". By the way, the National Women's Law Center is that way--> http://www.nwlc.org/ Go join up with your feminist pals if you care so much.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:12 PM
2

Cat smell? I'm not even allergic to cats but I stayed the night at a friend's house recently where my friend's brother hadn't been taking care of the kitty litter, and there was a distinct cat piss smell. He only has two cats. I woke up choking with phlegm in my throat, feeling nauseous. Went outside and spent the rest of the night in my car. If you can smell cat piss that's a seriously fucking health issue.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:02 PM
-2

Hm, seems like someone who responds to an argument by trolling meets the definition of bigot to me.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:58 PM
5

irrational You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Countries that do not have these irrational arguments, do not have these platforms for politicians to grandstand on. Yes, they've all agreed that transfer of wealth from men to women is a good thing. Thank God we have conservatives in the US who are still trying to defend us from these misandric Leftist policies. Whose side are you on again?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:55 PM
5

They're not your kids, they're hers. We used to have a traditional society where the children were the man's. We had only a 5% divorce rate, stable families, things were good. Men didn't keep women out of their children's lives on any significant level. Then we put women in charge and effectively made children the property of women. Now there's an approx. 50% divorce rate, a huge number of out of wedlock births, "baby daddy" is a common everyday term, families are broken up and dysfunctional, an…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:50 PM
4

I don't need to demonstrate anything about the conservative position. Joe Biden arguing that men's tax dollars should be used to pay for women's personal sexual frolicking is a Leftist big government stance, a stance he would have regardless of what any conservative might have to say on the matter. Democrats: Take men's tax dollars, transfer that wealth to women so that they don't have to pay for the consequences of their own actions. Learn to love your big daddy welfare state government, proles…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:44 PM
-3

Troll. By the way you're not using the term "bigot" correctly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:38 PM
1

I said they had equal mental capabilities. They don't. they are both capable of understanding advanced calculus and quantum mechanics, their minds just work in different ways which brings diversity of thought Lol, no, men are far more likely to have the capacity to understand and work with these concepts than are women. Furthermore, the true geniuses who advance these fields? Almost exclusively male. diversity of thought is good because it means that you will come up with more ways to arrive at …
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:35 PM
2

How dare conservatives curtail women's right to take money from men in the form of taxes in order to fund their lifestyle habits!
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:32 PM
3

Don't worry too much about Sigil1 and other Leftist cronies, they're no different than feminists, totally irrational, clinging to their religion.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:32 PM
4

Lol what a troll. Joe Biden does something, it's "the right" who's to blame. Absurd.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:30 PM
1

women have mental capabilities equal to that of men No they don't. Men and women's mental capabilities are different and not equal. Equal means the same. brings diversity of thought to scientific study You don't need "diversity of thought" in science, you just need people who seek the truth (primarily men) and are intelligent enough to find it (primarily men). women are humans too This is correct. and deserve to be treated as our equals Why would I treat someone as they are not? Men and women ar…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:55 PM
-7

Most of it comes from women's nature actually. Women are hypergamous and excel at manipulating men to take care of them. It's their survival strategy. Take it from one of the Founding Fathers of the men's movement, Angry Harry: http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenandChimps.htm Despite all the feminist rhetoric about career women, even most girls and women know subconsciously that they're best suited to a traditional female role, which is why they reacted this way in the OP.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:00 PM
1

Trolll. Unfortunately your mistreatment of MRAs here harms the movement and therefore is relevant to the sub-reddit. I do find it quite telling how quickly the moderators react when someone criticizes them, yet how sluggishly they react when a feminist trolls other MRAs or the entire movement. It's yet another crystal clear indication that the mods perceive this sub-reddit's primary importance as their own personal playground, not as a place for men's rights advocacy first and foremost. This is …
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:51 PM
2

Haha, more proof of what I said about you running away when the truth is revealed. Unfortunately your mistreatment of MRAs here harms the movement and therefore is relevant to the sub-reddit. I do find it quite telling how quickly the moderators react when someone criticizes them, yet how sluggishly they react when a feminist trolls other MRAs or the entire movement. It's yet another crystal clear indication that the mods perceive this sub-reddit's primary importance as their own personal playgr…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:51 PM
1

The rules are also designed primarily to make this place your personal playground rather than a place for activism.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:51 PM
2

Yes! What's important is getting together and sharing our period stories.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:50 PM
-1

Trollll.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:48 PM
0

Then learn to read.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:06 AM
-1

When everyone is allowed to participate, it lets people develop empathy for each other because they see them as people just like themselves instead of someone who has no identity apart from his/her subscription to an ideology. Oh Jesus, let's all get together and share our period stories, too. A movement needs a shared goal to function. Endless distractions do not make a movement.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:06 AM
7

I think the problem is the fact that the laws favor women. If the laws favored men then men would abuse those laws. The laws DID favor men in the past. They did not abuse those laws on anywhere near the same level that women have now that the laws are in their favor. Men and women are not the same. The problem is 1) women's nature 2) the removal of restrictions that used to keep that nature in check. The stuff about women MRAs was really surprising. The commenters discussed varying opinions on t…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:38 AM
1

I'm guessing we have to wait until VerySpecialSnowflake personally insults you, huh? That seems to be the only time you bother to ban feminist trolls. Tsk tsk.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:10 AM
-3

Hey! This is a meta post, dontchaknow you're not allowed to post meta content without express written consent from the almighty mods? Bad boy. /s
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:19 AM
-3

Feminist attention whoring trolls are so adorable!
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:17 AM
2

Oh I didn't realize the cowards deleted it, amusing. Here's what I said: One common trend that I notice when people link 'civil discussions' like this: it tends to be the woman/feminist/white-knight/what-have-you that always dismisses everything that was said and leaves. Lol too true. ignatiusloyola does the same thing whenever he's losing a debate, interesting.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:09 AM
1

I know exactly what type of system you advocate for.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:09 AM
1

Women have more fantasies of that sort than men do. Second of all a desire to be dominated sexually does not mean a woman or man wants to be raped at knifepoint by a stranger. Duh, and I didn't say any different. There's a difference between wanting something and enjoying it.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:08 AM
0

rape fantasies are the opposite of real rape No, they're not. The emotional reaction can be quite similar to that of real rape. Many women could enjoy being taken by force. It's true but very politically incorrect in our modern feminist utopia where women's desire to submit to men isn't allowed to be discussed. Even some MRAs have bought into this lie.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:53 PM
0

a police state enforced, totalitarian, Utopian ideal That describes what you and feminists jointly advocate for quite well, actually.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:51 PM
0

A lot of MRAs prefer to avoid discussion of goals because then we'd have to talk about solutions and the only viable solution thus far presented is some form of traditionalism.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:51 PM
-4

You are one committed feminist troll. My statement is a fact.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:48 PM
-1

Can't see it.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:25 PM
0

Yes.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:23 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:22 PM
0

True that.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:18 PM
2

But I thought MissRepresentation wasn't a troll? Assuming you finally banned this obvious feminist troll, thanks for finally doing your job! VerySpecialSnowflake is still waiting for a ban though.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:14 PM
3

Ah, women, the gentle sex.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:39 PM
4

NO! If a woman chooses to be a housewife she's just letting the patriarchy tell her she should be "barefoot and pregnant"! Only modern career women riding the cock carousel are REAL women! Believe it or not, I've actually seen a few supposed "MRAs" use the phrase "barefoot and pregnant" to describe traditional women. They aren't any different than feminists.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:32 PM
3

Adding a little TL;DR for future reference, since this isn't the first time the mods have demonstrated they're autocrats and it won't be the last. To the /r/mensrights moderators, a proposed rule is an implemented rule. The users have no say whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:40 PM
4

That is a PROPOSED rule that many of us disagree with -- it is not yet in the mod policy. Again you are showing your true colors. You proposed a rule, asked for "discussion", bashed those who didn't like it, and immediately started implementing it as if you had no intention in the first place of actually hearing out the users. You're so bold you never even bothered to add the proposed rule to the new mod policy before implementing it to censor articles you personally don't like. This action spea…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:27 PM
0

No, it's an issue with women in the workplace. Generally women in the workplace do jobs that have no real purpose. MEN dominate the meaningful positions in the workplace. They are the producers, the creators, the builders, the manufacturers. Women in the workforce are generally a drain on society, a distraction, only possible because of the labors of men. Society would be much better off if women didn't play at going to college and having a career while riding the cock carousel until they're 30 …
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:26 PM
1

See what I mean? You aren't well-adjusted at all. You're a snide aloof moron who has no idea how the real world works. If your parents had spanked your little ass they would've taught you something about the real world, and you wouldn't be such a spoiled brat.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:35 AM
1

No. Places that achieve more scientifically have the leisure of bringing women into the field. You have cause and effect backwards.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:34 AM
1

that kind of thinking is moronic. History shows otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:40 AM
1

I'm a well-adjusted person Oh really? Judging by your comments here, you're an offensive dogmatic ideologue who can't get past his own biases.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:39 AM
2

Symphonic interpretation of Ke$ha songs lol
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:37 AM
1

An IRC run by the r/mr mods is a bridge to nowhere.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:24 PM
0

Hitting a child is not necessarily child abuse. It is a method of discipline. You want to talk about child abuse, let's talk about idiots like you who refuse to discipline their children and are the primary reason so many young adults these days don't behave like adults. I'd say THAT is more child abuse than daring to discipline your child with physical punishment.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:10 PM
2

Ask anyone if VerySpecialSnowflake is a troll. Pretty much everyone I've asked agrees, other than you and Gareth. It's not a hard concept. Ban obvious feminist trolls. Don't ban MRAs. All you're trying to do is obfuscate the issue to get your "I'm a tough guy on the internet" kicks. Grow up and quit playing your silly juvenile games, will you? You're more tolerant of misandrists than you are MRAs. MRAs have been complaining about your bias for months and months. Prominent MRAs like Paul Elam, ev…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:09 PM
8

Marriage and divorce aren't men's rights issues though! Lord iggy said so!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:06 PM
0

It's a stupid thing to say.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:58 PM
1

No it doesn't mean "don't have emotions", it means don't be a coward.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:55 PM
3

As I've made clear repeatedly, I am against censorship of MRAs and for banning of feminist trolls. But if the mods are too retarded to be able to differentiate the two then I'd prefer you guys don't ban anybody.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:54 PM
0

I haven't. Sadiebb and embogenous ARE feminist trolls. That's who I was referring to.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:53 PM
1

Guess it depends on the guys.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:53 PM
1

Up-voted you but... I didn't say they were trolling here. I said they're feminist trolls, which Sadiebb and embogenous are. And they don't like the study. When feminist trolls dislike something, you know it must be something they don't want talked about.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:51 PM
-2

Oooh the feminist trolls sure don't like this one!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:54 AM
3

Feminists don't like the truth of the family courts getting out. They don't want the MRM to gain attention.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:26 AM
-1

Women as a whole were very much seen as the temptresses that holy men had to overcome. Which is a lot more accurate than how they're seen today.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:23 AM
1

What are you babbling about? I made my point and have nothing further to add. I'm beginning to realize why I have you marked as an anti-MRA troll. You're not arguing in good faith.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:16 AM
1

As long as someone can defend their statement and show its relevance it shouldn't be a problem. Obvious feminist trolls should be banned because they are nothing but a distraction.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:08 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:06 AM
0

Lately, actually, they pull a lot of punches. The new strategy is to pander to the mainstream and women. Discussion of solutions that do not involve pandering to the mainstream and women are not allowed.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:40 AM
-5

I would but it was already posted.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:36 AM
1

I kind of like it that way myself. Keeps things interesting.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:35 AM
2

No problem.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:32 AM
-8

I agree. Instead of arguing with this idiot, I'll just post some articles about the prevalence of false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:29 AM
-1

Yes, fathers are failing these days, as their fathers failed them. I've taught quite a few of my friends a few things about the nature of women. They received it quite well over a beer. I even learned some things from them. You can't really get the same dynamic going with a woman. It's just not the same.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:28 AM
3

I wasn't talking about you.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:27 AM
0

What's wrong with telling a boy to man up and not be afraid when he need not be afraid? Seems like good parenting to me.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:26 AM
3

I'd say don't make any rules other than to ban feminist trolls and spammers. If you do more than that, you'll be censoring MRAs who aren't PC enough for the hivemind.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:22 AM
-11

Most rape accusations are false. So yes, when women claim rape, most of the time it's a lie. Women lie about rape all the time.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:21 AM
-11

This is why men should be in charge of the home, and women should submit to their husbands. Women tend to abuse their power much more than men, as they are generally more selfish and short-sighted. These days women have all the power in the home, and they abuse it like hell. It's pretty absurd, really.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:19 AM
1

What are the rules?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:16 AM
2

Report and move on. The mods refuse to ban her for some reason but if enough people report her perhaps they'll get off their lazy asses and do their job.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:12 AM
-1

Not all women are like this All women are like that. I just want to know if there is any productive way to convince my guy friends that putting women on a pedestal is damaging to everyone. They have to learn for themselves. Or be taught by wiser men. A woman telling them this stuff isn't going to be taken seriously because even these manginas know that most women are just telling them things that she thinks will benefit her in some way, and they know that women don't know WTF they're talking abo…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:10 AM
-2

Because politicians need only pander to women and manginas, now that women have suffrage. You want to fix men's problem's? You'll need to eliminate women's suffrage at a minimum.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:07 AM
1

I like that song. And don't worry, I don't have to make the laws. Those kinds of laws will come about soon enough.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:04 AM
4

The feminists at wikipedia repeatedly deleted his article. http://thomasjamesball.com/ He immolated himself in protest of the corrupt family courts.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:02 AM
-8

I'd rather have him than ten feminist concern trolls like you, you piece of shit.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:01 AM
-11

Mm, if I made the laws I'd consider this worthy of death. And believe me, women wouldn't be doing this shit if I made the laws. :) The problem would be solved.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:59 AM
1

There are other options than slavery.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:58 AM
0

Yes, they keep using the word "advocating" or "calling for violence" to re-frame the discussion and shut down views they are reacting to purely out of emotion, without rational thought. They're as stupid and disingenuous as the feminists, really.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:56 AM
-10

Because women lie about rape all the time. And considering she's a crazy cunt, based on what she did, and crazy cunts are even more likely to lie about rape, the likelihood is high that she's a false accuser. Just like when a woman murders her husband in cold blood then claims he abused her, it's a flimsy fucking story.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:54 AM
-1

What is misogyny?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:52 AM
0

oh, you mean the people calling for violence and murder? Learn to be more precise with your phrasing. I did not see anyone "calling" for violence or murder. shall I spend a few minutes explaining to you why that's both unacceptable and stupid? Yes, you should. Unlike you I prefer arguments rather than emotional outbursts like yours and feminists' and manginas'. You aren't any different than them; you act exactly the same, and you share many of the same views. If you were smarter you'd realize th…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:48 AM
-3

You're a divorced father yet you're still more concerned with "misogyny" than learning the truth. That's just pathetic. Here's a nice blog for you: http://wimminz.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:42 AM
2

I'm no more a troll than you are. You made no argument whatsoever. You just said blah blah stupid blah blah violent blah blah delete posts blah blah ban. Make an argument next time instead of spouting off a bunch of insults and requests to censor MRAs and you'll appear less foolish.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:50 AM
14

"Male chauvinist pig" = any man who dares not to fall in line and do what a woman demands.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:39 AM
-12

In all likelihood the woman in the TwoX story is lying about the "rape".
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:38 AM
10

Because despite our modern conditioning, a lot of people still realize innately that violence IS the answer sometimes if you actually want justice in a world where justice is rare. There's a reason movies where a man takes vengeance on his enemies into his own hands are so popular.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:35 AM
1

I contribute more than you do. Also, I am only belligerent in response to belligerence. Yours and ignatiusloyola's for example. MRA: The mods are behaving like women who commit DV. Their goal is to hit you enough to infuriate you, and when you lash out, to claim you're a bully. It's hilarious that for a sub that complains about passive aggression, /r/MR is ruled by it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:19 AM
1

I would have banned Snowflake by now if it wasn't for Truthman et al.'s campaign for "free speech". My ass. I never asked for "free speech" for feminist trolls, you idiot. I asked you to stop banning MRAs. Again: The mods are behaving like women who commit DV. Their goal is to hit you enough to infuriate you, and when you lash out, to claim you're a bully. It's hilarious that for a sub that complains about passive aggression, /r/MR is ruled by it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:18 AM
2

Your ideology is a desire for power and control. Projection.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:12 AM
0

JtO, you're such a sissy. Canada, land of the sissies. Hint: When you call people "just fucking stupid" for expressing a view, you open yourself up to attacks as well. Play nice.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:17 PM
-2

if you listen to Osama bin Ladin's old videos, he justifies everything with defending themself against foreign oppression Then perhaps he was justified. Violence begets violence, and America started it.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:15 PM
1

if you think that reporting rape in the military gets you any benefits Some women certainly believe it does.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:08 PM
1

I would much rather have trolls in here then banning users. But those aren't the alternatives. Gareth refuses to ban feminist trolls yet happily bans MRAs. If he stopped banning MRAs, too, I'd be fine with a non-banning policy.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:43 PM
1

Women just like assholes.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:40 PM
-12

The real fight here is against Leftism, of which feminism is only one component. You can't engage in effective activism if you aren't fighting the real enemy. I find Paul's article laughable.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:36 PM
1

Still waiting for you to ban the obvious feminist trolls, and stop looking for excuses to ban MRAs. GL with that. I get down-votes here and there, especially from feminists and their Left-leaning friends like you, but anyone in their right mind can see I'm an MRA. VSS got almost negative 30 down-votes here. Even I don't get that kind of down-voting unless one of your Leftist pals like Legolas-the-elf brings an SRD/SRS down-vote squad into a thread to down-vote me. VSS is a feminist trolls, which…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:44 AM
0

Sure you don't, even though your rhetoric proves otherwise: http://www.reddit.com/user/Aoife246
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:20 AM
1

if I was a feminist, do you think I would be on /r/mensrights Yup. And that's exactly what you are.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:12 AM
4

hahaha IGGY-what an idiot you can't make this shit up The mods aren't MRAs they're anti-MRAs.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:08 AM
1

Everyone like you, sure. I have you marked as a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:05 AM
1

for implying a man can't control his urges I never ever said that, troll.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:59 AM
-2

OH c'mon. Do I really have to explain this in this sub-reddit? REALLY? Who gains more by LYING about rape? WOMEN. Who is more worried about the idea of claiming rape because no one will believe him? MEN.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:30 AM
4

We have had this argument before. Game/PUA content doesn't belong on r/MR. Shut up ignoramus.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:15 AM
3

The mods care more about appearances than action. They aren't activists, they're politicians. They aren't MRAs at all.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:09 AM
1

Gareth: Finds every excuse in the book to ban MRAs, yet finds every excuse in the book NOT to ban feminist trolls even when the users request it over and over. Gareth: A bastion of logical consistency, assuming Gareth is more a feminist than an MRA. Then his actions are totally consistent.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:59 AM
-5

I'm not assuming anything. It's a simple fact.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:38 AM
0

That's true as well. Men are more likely to not report. Women are more likely to falsely accuse.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:37 AM
-1

Exactly. I wouldn't be surprised if half, perhaps more, of the reported allegations by females were false. On the other hand, it would be rare for men to falsely accuse.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:27 AM
-7

Well we must also acknowledge that women are much more likely to lie about sexual assault than men.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:26 AM
1

Lol, well occasionally some Cliff's notes will help the crowd.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:23 AM
8

Real women don't dress like that. See? Two can play at that game.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:46 PM
4

This will fly over their heads.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:43 PM
3

The other to be Gollum dressed up in tweed and a sweater. You mean a liberal? Hahahaha.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:43 PM
2

Can you say Manboobz?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:41 PM
0

Landlady :)
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:35 PM
3

Doesn't jive. The mods spend a lot of time banning Manhood Academy guys and they make new accounts too. Obviously they think it has some effect. For example, a new account can only post every 9 minutes. VSS on the other hand, can troll freely.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:29 PM
4

nwz123 actually is a feminist sympathizer though so it doesn't apply to him.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:03 PM
5

Perhaps, but if this is going to be an activist sub-reddit obvious anti-MRA trolls should be banned.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:57 PM
3

Another special angel spreads her wings.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:54 PM
2

Oh thank you special princess for edumucating me.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:46 PM
10

Wow you're a condescending ass. The concept nice itself WAS quite pejorative to begin with. We're merely getting back to its roots, which is probably a good thing. It means we're learning once again that being a "nice guy" is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:37 PM
11

Why aren't you banned yet?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:36 PM
4

unfortunately, the concept nice itself has become mildly pejorative nice etymology: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=nice late 13c., "foolish, stupid, senseless," from O.Fr. nice (12c.) "careless, clumsy; weak; poor, needy; simple, stupid, silly, foolish," from L. nescius "ignorant, unaware," lit. "not-knowing," from ne- "not" (see un-) + stem of scire "to know" (see science).
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:29 PM
-6

The other thing is it's actually quite natural for men to "cheat" on women. Men are more polygamous, and women are more hypergamous. It's much easier for a woman to settle down with one male than it is for a man to settle down with just one woman. Furthermore, when a woman cheats, it indicates she doesn't see her current partner at the same level of status as the new, due to her hypergamy, and therefore it is a threat to the relationship. But when a man cheats, generally he's just looking for so…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:47 PM
3

Yep. In case you’re not up on monkey business, bonobo apes have been hailed by many as a potential model for a more peaceful, feminist society. Chimpanzees are patriarchal, they make war, and they hunt, kill and eat other monkeys. Bonobos do a little hunting–perhaps more than was initially thought–but the status of a male bonobo is determined by the status of his mother. In fact, it’s likely that he won’t know his father or organize with other males. Female bonobos form coalitions to check male …
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:41 PM
3

The biggest danger comes from cohabitation. You can get all the sex you want without it these days.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:33 PM
1

Government can do no wrong! Government good! Private sector bad!
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:13 AM
2

I'm not sure when it comes to feminists, but we should at least be able to treat each other well. :)
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:25 PM
1

He goes around insulting and mocking people and he wonders why people don't like him. If he just treated people with more respect we could dispense with all this hostility. He ought to live the Golden Rule.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:18 PM
4

Haha, you're such a troll. Every time someone provides evidence that happens to come from the US, you claim they're ign'nt 'Mericans and summarily discount what they said. That's entirely fallacious and extremely rude. Most of the readership here is from the US and we don't need your elitist anti-American rhetoric here. Believe it or not, Americans aren't so different from the rest of the world that you're allowed to disregard the lessons we've learned from American history whenever it suits you…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:11 PM
3

The first one you have no evidence for. Wow. That's just a blatant lie.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:10 PM
1

Nobody else can see the actual links there since he removed them to censor the inconvenient truth that conflicts with his personal political ideology. I believe these are the links you're referring to? http://www.springerlink.com/content/x737rhv91438554j/ Abstract: In this paper we test the hypothesis that extensions of the voting franchise to include lower income people lead to growth in government, especially growth in redistribution expenditures. The empirical analysis takes advantage of the …
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:08 PM
3

I thought wavegeek's post was interesting and informative. He also provided a summary of Sex and Culture and a succinct condemnation of feminism. I don't see a problem with highlighting informative posts.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:07 PM
2

Feminism itself, not specifically dependent feminism, has no correlation to economic prosperity Yes it does.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:23 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/z8xs5/dependent_feminism_is_bankrupting_our_country/c62rx4b
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:22 PM
2

My point has already been proven here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/z8xs5/dependent_feminism_is_bankrupting_our_country/c62prfq
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:37 AM
5

Who are you? Never seen you before. Funny how random people who've never posted here before always come out to defend the mods and attack MRAs. My point has already been proven here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/z8xs5/dependent_feminism_is_bankrupting_our_country/c62prfq
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:35 AM
0

is there something wrong with the spectrum of political views you disagree with? Plenty of things. Misandry, for one.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:25 AM
-3

The world does not revolve around you, infant. I'm an MRA who posts at /r/mensrights. You're a feminist sympathizer who trolls MRAs. Ain't much more to say about it.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:23 AM
-2

Paraphrased: Ignore everything bad feminism does. I'm ignatiusloyola, and I approve this feminist message. When are you running for office?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:21 AM
1

That actually is what you said, Mr. feminist. ignatiusloyola: feminism is harmless or good, especially for the economy. Yay feminism! (Paraphrased, yet accurate. Slimy, yet satisfying.)
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:16 AM
1

Please do recommend the book which shows that feminism is good for the economy, Mr. Feminist. I'd love to read it. No wonder you don't call yourself an MRA.... Mr. Feminist clown.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:46 AM
0

There is really no correlation between feminism and economic troubles. Hahaha. Ignatiusloyola: feminist defender.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:37 AM
1

it objectifies women as only good for sex and somehow gives men power over women Yes, that is what many crazy feminists think, which is what I was saying in the first part of my comment.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:16 PM
1

On one hand, feminists want to control men's access to sex because this is how women gain power over men. Controlling men's access to sex is a primary goal of feminism. This is the reason many feminists want to limit porn and prostitution. On the other hand, feminists want to promote "girl power" and stop men from controlling women's behavior. This is the reason many feminists want to promote debauchery in women, because many men do not approve of such behavior in women.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:39 AM
1

I quoted only the r/LGBT portion. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:33 AM
2

I said nothing of /r/ainbow. Learn to read before you post.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:29 AM
3

You keep saying that, but it's still not true. Maybe you should actually read the article. The problem today with most tradcons is that they've bought into too much liberal feminist crap and discarded Christianity, which actually teaches the opposite of what you're stating.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:01 AM
2

That's not logical.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:16 PM
1

GWW i think classifies herself as one Hahaha no she doesn't.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:52 PM
1

Feminism was a good cause till parts were made into cancer. No, feminism was always bad. Feminism is a cancer.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:45 PM
1

I loathe socialism. I'm not a neocon.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:43 PM
-8

r/LGBT is run by SRS-types so that's not going to happen. Clarification: It's run by Leftists, so that's not going to happen.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:25 PM
1

Most prison rapes are racially motivated crimes perpetrated by black male inmates against white male inmates. Source: http://www.justdetention.org//pdf/knowles2.pdf As far as the media is concerned, white males deserve it.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:19 PM
0

If your husband isn't giving you enough attention try craigslist. /r/mensrights isn't the place for your attention whoring. I guess things aren't as perfect as you claim.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:51 AM
-3

Well I wouldn't call the women I sleep with "problems". That would be misogynistic! Perhaps you should refer to this to see how you're promoting misandry: http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/ Charge of Unattractiveness Guess you're not a NAWALT after all. Aw shucks.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:48 AM
2

As long as "equality" is the primary goal of modernity, we won't see significant change.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:26 AM
-1

Congratulations you very special snowflake you.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:05 AM
1

Oh, because I don't fall in line with the herd, I must be a Manhood Academy guy? You're puerile.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:50 AM
2

Manhood Academy are MRAs. They're banned because they're considered extreme by moderators who aren't MRAs who value only political correctness and do no activism. I'm sure if they weren't disrespected they'd behave better here. Cause and effect.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:45 AM
-1

Yeah, feminist sweethearts like you are real special.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:44 AM
2

What are you on about?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:33 PM
-6

Women marry for lust and convenience, not "love". Typical feminist NAWALT drivel.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:30 PM
-9

Try not to be such a white knight.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:29 PM
1

That's a rather facile view.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:47 PM
1

Odd how the mods spend so much time removing actual men's rights activists' posts and so little removing feminists' posts.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:18 AM
-8

It's called a "shit test". They all do it.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:10 AM
2

Read the book. You don't know what it means to be a man.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:10 AM
0

Oh goody, it' s Gareth being a bigot. He's so smart.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:31 AM
1

And I'm talking about yours, feminist swine.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:21 AM
-1

Yours too, radical feminist swine.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:21 AM
5

Strength, courage, mastery and honour are good values, but they are not unique to males. You obviously didn't read it. It's okay. Now I know you're the type that promotes women over men no matter what else. Being a man is a bad thing for you. You're sick. G'day.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:20 AM
0

I know all about proper workplace conduct. Men = bad. Women = good.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:51 PM
4

I'm starting to think Leftists refuse to see the difference because they're actually glad that these things happen when people stand up against the PC police. Schadenfreude.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:51 PM
2

Sometimes you over-estimate our knowledge base.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:47 PM
1

This article says something similar: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/z3ny1/we_women/
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:44 PM
-1

wtf are you on about now? Anyway, I don't feel like chatting further with a man-hater. See ya, fem-bot. Your days are numbered.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:42 PM
3

Masculinity is rooted in survival. The four manly virtues are strength, courage, mastery, and honor. The manly virtues are excellences of the male. Donovan wants to make a distinction between specifically masculine virtue (what he calls “being good at being a man”) and virtue that any “person,” male or female, can manifest (men who achieve those virtues may be “good men,” but may not be “good at being a man”). He makes this distinction in a simple and extremely clever way. He points out that the…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:37 PM
0

Weird how women didn't get fired. Idiot.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:20 PM
1

I disagree with the idea that there is only one way to be a "real man". Never said that. All men are "real". Some are better at being men than others. For example, trans "women" aren't very good men. Masculinity has meaning.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:20 PM
-2

not the most important thing No wonder I have you marked as a feminist supporter.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:16 PM
-2

Ah, so the truth is not allowed here. We aren't allowed to discuss the roots of problems, only superficially complain about them. As long as the problem is Leftism. Then we're not allowed to discuss it. I see. Your political bias is showing. And you are engaging in the same tactics as the Leftists I was discussing. Silence dissent. Promote PC. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:05 PM
2

Examples of instances where conservatives engaged in the same behavior as Leftists do so often, please. When the dominant narrative in the public sector is political correctness, Leftists support aspects of political correctness much more than conservatives, and violation of PC is the number one grounds for character assassination, I'm not sure how you could possibly claim with a straight face that conservatives engage in this behavior as much as Leftists. edit: Prediction: The next avenue of at…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:58 PM
2

My point is that these harassment squads are feminist. The underlying motivation is feminism. Not liberalism. Both, actually.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:51 PM
4

Demonization of typically masculine behavior. It's bad for boys.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:33 PM
2

This is why.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:26 PM
6

I actually think it's more the whining and victimhood that he finds repulsive. You have to admit a good portion of "MRAs" do appear to be jealous and angry at men who are good at getting women, and angry at women for liking those types of men. They don't like PUA because they want to imagine that NAWALT, that such things couldn't possibly work on the "fairer" sex. I think if you asked Roosh his views he'd largely agree with what Jack Donovan said here: http://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRA/comments/y0fc…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:24 PM
2

A
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:14 PM
-2

There are still plenty of conservatives here, more than enough to form a substantial harassment squad. SRS has 20,000+ followers. Conservatives could at the very least develop a 1,000+ follower sub-reddit harassment squad, if they were as fueled by hatred as Leftists. But they don't because they aren't. They have sub-reddits where they discuss issues. I am well aware of the liberal bias on Reddit. It just isn't relevant because we should still expect to see something popular like SRS but for con…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:03 PM
-6

Oh really? It's usually extreme Leftists who go on these campaigns of character assassination. There's no conservative equivalent to SRS, now is there? There is indeed a correlation whether you like it or not. Leftists, including feminists, tend toward passive-aggressive personal attacks and away from rational discussion. They don't want a debate, they want a lynching. Same thing happened to The Amazing Atheist and countless others. How about skepchick Rebecca Watson and the elevator thing? Hear…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:55 PM
-3

Why? Because men are evil oppressors who objectify the poor innocent women? Shut up fembot.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:31 PM
-11

It's amazing how people Leftists will destroy a person's life because the person said something they didn't like.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:28 PM
3

Obama is smart enough to actually know that everything he says is a lie. Obama is evil. Romney is just stupid.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:25 PM
2

Sexist and bigoted feminists AKA Obama, whose executive order has forced universities to use the preponderance standard.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:56 AM
-6

Here's a solution: get some sun and engage in exercise. So hard.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:10 AM
1

What was the link? It has been removed.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:08 AM
-3

What is this shit?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:53 PM
2

Last night, we had a four hour conversation that was seemingly very productive, and I got her to acknowledge some thing about how she treats me that she never was willing to admit. You will soon find out that although she seems to have taken this information to heart, she will soon forget you ever had the conversation. I know from experience. It's going to happen again and again and again until you leave.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:51 PM
4

Yes, that would be accurate. I am totally against such laws because they encourage false claims, much as "family" laws encourage false accusations for child custody, and laws in general encourage women to use and abuse men.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:02 PM
28

But your post was "why MRAs should be pro-choice". MaunaLoona just showed you why it's perfectly acceptable for MRAs to be pro-life.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:54 PM
-5

You're also a huge mangina who hates masculine values, so I'll take that as a vote for same sex education. Most boys benefit immensely from it, though effeminate guys like you may not. The world does not revolve around you, so I suggest you change your stance on this issue.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:43 AM
1

Haha, that's true, that's one risk of the pull-out method. But at least you're aware when she's doing it, unlike with birth control or holes poked in condoms.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:32 AM
-1

I proved my point throughout the thread. If you'd like to keep spreading misinformation, that's your prerogative.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:31 AM
1

Is it really so hard? I have no trouble with it. Neither do pornstars. There is always a warning.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:17 AM
1

Feminism is an evil ideology.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:16 AM
0

I'd know, since feminism is evil always, troll.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:14 PM
1

In fairness you don't see them on primetime TV which kids watch.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:32 AM
1

More logical fallacies and failure to argue against the actual point I made.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:16 AM
1

Not according to wikipedia. Learn to read. Here you go, since clearly I have to research things for you. While no large conclusive studies have been done, it is now believed the primary cause of method (correct-use) failure is the pre-ejaculate fluid picking up sperm from a previous ejaculation.[16] For this reason, it is recommended that the male partner urinate between ejaculations, to clear the urethra of sperm, and wash any ejaculate from objects that might come near the woman's vulva (e.g. …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:58 PM
6

Feminists only like the gay men who thoroughly separate themselves from anything masculine. Flamboyant gay man? Good, he's one of the girls. Muscular, straight-seeming gay man? BAD, VERY BAD, he's part of the patriarchy! Feminism has always been about attacking masculine men.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:57 PM
-1

I have said: 1) I would guess that not ejaculating in her and urinating would take it from 4% to 0-2% and later: 2) That if you urinate and do not ejaculate in her I would probably imagine the chance would be near zero. Both are guesses based on the fact that a "perfect" use of the pull-out method ignores the obviously critical requirement to get rid of the ejaculate in your urethra. Considering studies show precum does not contain fertile spermatozoa, it's pretty fucking common sense that if yo…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:21 PM
0

It's a different scenario when a man who is forced to impregnate a woman is held responsible for it, while a woman who is forcibly impregnated by a man is not.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:17 PM
-5

These trolls are made for trollin'. That's just what they'll do.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:09 PM
-7

Never said that, nice strawman though.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:09 PM
-3

:)
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:08 PM
-7

That was not my argument. Nice straw man, feminist-troll.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:07 PM
0

Not so here.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:07 PM
-1

Perfect use = don't cum in her, urinate after ejaculation. Perfect use is fucking easy when it comes to the pull-out method.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:07 PM
1

That would probably make more sense since the Left is attacking him so vigorously.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:52 PM
-1

Your article also states that actual failure rates are 15–28%, which means that the overwhelming majority of people cannot use the pullout method. No, that's not what it means. It means most of the people who use it are not using it correctly. I am advocating for using it correctly. You would rather advocate ignoring its uses totally because you believe everything the mainstream media tells you. Sheep, baaaa.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:49 PM
-8

No, I put men down for being manginas who pander to women because they are the enemies to men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:40 PM
-2

Do you have any legitimate sources explaining how taking a piss will make babies less likely? My penis proves this. No piss? Cum still oozes out. Piss? It gets pissed out. Use some common sense, Jesus.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:37 PM
-2

I already explained why it's less than 4% if you're smart in the other thread. I also explained the other benefits, which are many.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:40 PM
1

Ignorance and condescension, especially in tandem, can be infuriating.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:38 PM
1

Honestly it is disappointing that people who are aware of how much they've been lied to by the establishment regarding men's rights will just buy what they're told on other topics without a second thought.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:30 PM
-7

The manly kind? The kind that isn't a gynocentric mangina white knight who panders to women? Yep, that's me.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:21 PM
-1

There's enough sperm in the pre-cum that she could get pregnant No there isn't. The 'best' combination is to use a condom and to pull out. Yes, that's the 'best' combination if you want zero pleasure out of sex. Oral sex is better than that. We are having a discussion here where I've explained more fully: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yt8gq/the_pullout_birth_control_method_can_be_as/c5ymdny
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:19 PM
-1

We are already having this discussion here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yt8gq/the_pullout_birth_control_method_can_be_as/c5ymdny If you have something to add, add it there.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:18 PM
-3

The safest way a man can protect himself against unwanted pregnancies is to wear a condom AND pull out before he comes. Lol, you're suggesting wearing a condom AND pulling out? So like, ZERO pleasure for the guy. You're a feminist, so I'm not surprised. With proper pull-out method your chances of pregnancy are near zero, you are fully in control, and you can actually enjoy sex. Respond to the comment here where we are already having this discussion if you have something to say that isn't complet…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:17 PM
-1

Haven't you ever ejaculated before you were ready? Not since I was a kid. there is enough sperm in pre-cum to cause pregnancy No there isn't. It has been suggested that the pre-ejaculate ("Cowper's fluid") emitted by the penis prior to ejaculation normally contains spermatozoa (sperm cells), which would compromise the effectiveness of the method.[10][11] However, several small studies[12][13][14][15] have failed to find any viable sperm in the fluid. While no large conclusive studies have been d…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:09 PM
2

See my comment here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yt8gq/the_pullout_birth_control_method_can_be_as/c5ynfgt?context=3 What's really going on in this thread is people who have been indoctrinated to regard the pull-out method as bad are just rationalizing their beliefs. They haven't fully thought it through.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:37 PM
0

The pull-out method is completely within your control. Condoms' failures are not. It's quite easy to use the pull-out method. I know from experience.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:36 PM
2

First they came... Although I despise Leftists and their anti-male ideology, I try not to engage in schadenfreude when they are harmed by the injustices they created, because most of the time it's innocent people being harmed in the same way. It's why I defend Dominique-Strauss Kahn as well. I admit, it is a bit of poetic justice when misandrist assholes end up getting raked over the coals when their wives divorce them and steal their kids, because they thought NAWALT, and we warned 'em but they…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:20 PM
1

I figured she wasn't since you were able to get her off of you.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:13 PM
-11

I think using a condom is also a pretty mangina-like thing to do. It changes sex from mutual gratification to being all about pleasing her while the man receives little sensation. I'd rather just get oral sex than have sex with a condom again. And the pull-out method, at least, keeps YOU in control. I also think this is part of the reason why condoms and female birth control are recommended by the mainstream (feminist, anti-male) establishment. Condoms remove sensation. Condoms prevent a man fro…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:08 PM
0

we broke up after she tried to force me to ejaculate inside her by holding me on her while i was inside her about to come. i ended up having to force myself off of her. That actually is a danger of the pull-out method, but I certainly wouldn't have sex with a girl who's big to overpower me. :) And if a girl wants to get pregnant, it's much easier for you to be in control with the pull-out method than with others. It's much easier for her to poke holes in condoms or stop taking the pill when she …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:06 PM
1

True enough. Use of the pull-out method requires confidence in knowing when you're going to ejaculate and keeping a level head.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:04 PM
-4

STDs is a valid concern with the pull-out method as opposed to condoms, but pregnancy is not. The pull-out method is completely within your control and may even be more effective than condoms or the pill, failure of which is NOT within your control. "perfect" pull-out: 4% failure rate per year "perfect" condom: 2% failure rate per year "imperfect" pull-out: 27% failure rate per year "imperfect" condom: 15% failure rate per year So if you're smart enough to take your dick out before you ejaculate…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:03 PM
0

"perfect" pull-out: 4% "perfect" condom: 2% "imperfect" pull-out: 27% "imperfect" condom: 15% So if you're smart enough to take your dick out before you cum, you have a 4% chance. Apparently the chance is lowered if you're smart enough to urinate between ejaculations, probably 0-2%. The failure of the pull-out method is 100% within YOUR control. Failures of condoms, however, are not within your control. Breakage is not within your control. Slipping off may be within your control if you have a pr…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:01 PM
1

still less effective than virtually any other method Properly executed it is better than condoms.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 06:15 PM
0

It is not a "huge caveat". If you fail to urinate between ejaculations, it's still only a 4% yearly failure rate. If you're not smart enough to use it, then don't. If you have enough of a brain to take your dick out of the girl before you cum, it's extremely effective.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:51 PM
-1

It's not misinformation. You are spreading misinformation.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:45 PM
0

It's not difficult to use the pull-out method correctly.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:44 PM
0

Yes, yes it is. And this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yss6d/if_he_got_her_pregnant_its_his_own_damn_fault/c5yk6cf Someone as foolish as you shouldn't talk down to anyone on the internet.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:44 PM
-14

It's unwise to trust women with birth control when you have so much at risk if they decide to compromise it or fail to maintain it. Pull-out method is as effective as condoms, and you stay in control.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:14 AM
3

If enough people complain things might change.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:08 AM
0

Everything about Leftism, including feminism, is societal suicide.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:56 AM
4

she is polish and feminism is still doing good things there Feminism doesn't do good things anywhere.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:39 AM
6

Yeah I'd say the real ultimatum was: Be an MRA and have a happy life without her OR Do what she demands and be miserable. Why this choice is difficult I cannot fathom.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:38 AM
1

If you don't tow the Leftist line you're a white supremacist dontchaknow. I was going to post this video but you already've submitted it. Ah well, at least now I can post another of his videos to /r/whiterights.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:31 AM
1

I have taken it into account. So have you. I don't believe you really lie to yourself as much as you lie to the rest of us.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:12 AM
1

I'm really not interested in hearing what your rationalization hamster pops out at any given time. The fact remains you are an autocrat who disregards the views of those with which you disagree and does whatever the hell you want, and it's disingenuous for you to claim you listen to anyone but those you want to hear. It's all bull and you know it, I know it, plenty of others know it, and you know we know it. The least you can do if you have a modicum of integrity is to try to refrain from lying …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:51 AM
1

Stop trying to claim the user base supports your actions when it's not clear they do. YOU are the one who has decided to censor stuff that isn't politically correct enough for YOUR tastes, no one else. Most prominent MRAs disagree with your views on this matter and have repeatedly shown you to be wrong.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:48 PM
0

It was quite a popular thread, genius. It appears the user base largely agrees with what GirlWritesWhat posted, so this comment of yours: a large enough portion of the user base is tired of being harassed for being part of a "hate group" due to things that a relatively few number of people have said isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:42 PM
1

a large enough portion of the user base is tired of being harassed for being part of a "hate group" due to things that a relatively few number of people have said Did you somehow miss this? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/y6x2v/girlwriteswhat_even_when_you_behave_perfectly_if/ even when you behave perfectly, if you're an MRA, feminists and others will talk **** about how you're a misogynist, hateful violent terrorist. It really doesn't matter what we do.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:14 PM
1

Something like "earning scorn from feminists and white knights since 2008". Then it something like "earning scorn from bigoted feminists and white knights". There may have been some other changes in between. In the end we ended up with this limp-wristed "advocating for equality" nonsense and no indication of who our primary enemies are or the overall goal of many MRAs, which is not "equality", since men and women are not the same.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:54 PM
1

Most hate movements I know of don't fight for the rights of those they hate.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:36 PM
0

It's good when people (guys or girls) find this sub-reddit and are glad to have found it. It's not good when girls go out of their way to attention whore.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:35 PM
0

More activism, less attention whoring please.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:32 PM
7

Once upon a time it stood for equal rights and fair treatment under the law No, it never did. Feminism has always been a way to give women special privileges over men without equal responsibilities. Always.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:02 AM
9

Just because you hate white people (like feminists hate men) doesn't mean you can't support the rights of white people (like MRAs support men's rights). Wait, that doesn't make sense somehow....
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:00 AM
6

Absolutely not. Feminism is a thoroughly anti-male ideology. The title of the sub-reddit used to explicitly acknowledge feminism's anti-male role until the pro-feminist (and thus anti-male) mods changed it in response to feminists' demands.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:58 AM
1

It was the conservatives and hardcore "freedom of speech" types that wanted to start removing stuff in the first place because they felt it was "off topic". LGBT stuff, for example. But now that policy seems to be rejected as soon as it ends up affecting something one of them has posted... Proof please.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:57 AM
-4

He probably saw it on Glee, probably the biggest piece of Leftist indoctrination on TV.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:01 AM
0

Let me know if the mods give you a hard time for stating the truth about Leftism. Don't let their bigotry get in your way.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:48 AM
1

Don't forget, trans issues are also always men's rights issues: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/y8cb5/are_conservativethemed_posts_allowed_on/c5uelmn Destruction of the black family, however, isn't a men's issue. And you're not allowed to refer to the Left's attacks on men: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/xzw1h/janet_napolitanorun_homeland_security_treated/c5r8ttr?context=3 But you can badmouth conservatives and the mods will give you a pat on the back. In fact, they'…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:46 AM
5

TIL I'm racist for caring about the destruction of black families. You, sir, are a complete fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:35 AM
0

The subscribers have already told you what constitutes "off topic". We've already told you to stop censoring stuff you disagree with just because you don't like it. It's pretty clear. Stop being immature authoritarian children. You act like the kids who killed Piggy in Lord of the Flies. You're disgusting.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:21 AM
0

Very true. ignat is a good liar. If I weren't so smart, he might have fooled me!
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:57 AM
0

If that's the case then stop encouraging it, which is exactly what you have done several times in r/SRD as long as it benefited you. Considering SRD is quite anti-male, and so are you, it usually benefits you to encourage it when your anti-male moderation policies are in question.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:34 AM
2

You wont debate your ideology. Your anti-male ideology. I get it. You're not alone.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:16 AM
-1

the same users all seem to turn up at once to the same threads and the votes change by five points too Indeed. Every time you crosspost to SubredditDrama, that happens.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:49 AM
-2

Your comment in the thread suggests otherwise. You're quick to make baseless accusations against conservative-leaning and anti-censorship MRAs, but when your buddies bring down-vote squads to posts you don't like, suddenly it's not that big a deal and you play it off. By the way you forgot to address your other lies.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:14 AM
-1

Me, blind? /r/aboutmensrights proves otherwise regarding your behavior. Plenty of examples of you attacking users out of the blue for having a difference of opinion. Who are you trying to convince? Your Leftie sycophants already back you on your abusive and censorious behavior. You surround yourself with Leftie mods who share your same views and do as you say. Don't be silly.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:10 AM
-3

History proves my assertion: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yncpp/deblackifying_a_controversial_post/c5x5oh7?context=3 We've already been over this. But seriously, someone mentioned recently that you guys had your own private sub (/r/MRAs is it, I think?). Nope. A bunch of people started showing up to previously removed threads, indicating that there had to be a cross link somewhere. Interesting. Haven't heard you complaining about your pal Legolas-the-elf's repeatedly linking meta …
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:09 AM
-1

ignatius attacks users repeatedly. Users respond. ignatius is the victim. Sounds like a feminist mindset to me.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:04 AM
-1

Actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:55 PM
-3

Yeah, I get it, any time someone disagrees with you it's a conspiracy.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:54 PM
1

Well, that's because you are guided by dogma, not reason. But at least you have the decency admit you're not open to alternative ideas.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:52 PM
1

Absolute baloney. Compare the number of comments in this thread in only a few hours to the number in the meta thread. If we want real discussion, we keep it in the sub-reddit. If we want censorship, we put it over in the meta thread where few will read it or comment on it, even if it's linked in the main sub-reddit, unless people link to it externally. If you really wanted discussion you would've left this up. You must think I'm stupid to try to feed me this garbage.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:44 PM
0

You're being sectarian.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:41 PM
-1

No, the primary effect of your constant harassment of conservative-leaning MRAs is not to grow the sub-reddit but to push actual activists out of it. You're anti-MRA.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:35 PM
1

Why is it liberals use the term "conflate" so often to obfuscate the issue? You and ignatius do it a lot. It's quite odd.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:04 PM
0

Looks like Factory posted some new threads after the mods deleted this one: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ynn8c/getting_around_the_censors_at_mensrights_femra/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/ynnk5/the_mods_at_mensrights_are_ideological_cultists/
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:53 PM
0

Yes, and it is a vision rooted in complete ignorance of the issues.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:59 PM
-1

It's all a game to them. ignatius and the other mods behave the same way. I used to have a hope for Celda since he actually has done activism, but he doesn't seem to really give a hoot.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:54 PM
3

The sub exists to hide disagreement with the moderators' bad behavior, nothing more. If you really wanted to "poll the users" like you claim you do, you'd have let the thread stand. Hypocrisy and lies are all we see from you.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:43 PM
6

That's strange, your post has been removed by the mods. I guess they didn't actually want to poll the userbase on this issue. :) edit: FYI Factory2 has created the following threads regarding this topic since the mods deleted his post when they noticed they were losing the debate: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ynn8c/getting_around_the_censors_at_mensrights_femra/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/ynnk5/the_mods_at_mensrights_are_ideological_cultists/
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:38 PM
-5

He's shown a consistent pattern. So have you. Agree with those who will support you no matter how much you fuck up, harass and censor those who dare question your almighty greatness. Keep on with the sarcastic comments, it's all you have.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:19 PM
1

To be clear, they feel that only their own personal vision of the MRM should be allowed, and they have no compunction about hurting those who don't share that same exact vision.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:17 PM
9

The mods will poll the users, generally History shows otherwise. When the users dissent, you claim their opinions are irrelevant. Remember when folks asked for some balance on the mod team, instead of you just promoting radical Left-leaning people like yourself? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q79u3/politics_and_mens_rights/c3vpidn Your response was to falsely claim the following: Making so many different accounts to argue with so that you guys seem like there are more people who sup…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:13 PM
-1

Oh I know who they are. Legolas-the-elf is another. He even posts threads the mods don't like to SubredditDrama so they can be down-voted in favor of the mods. The mods seem to appreciate it.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:09 PM
-6

Sigil1 (AKA Sigi1 AKA Eoghan) defends the mods because he likes the fact they attack and censor those who disagree with him. He always has done so. It's nothing new.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:00 PM
0

Because if I'm not mistaken, not fucking one of them participates in the MRM outside of this reddit, and none of the mods have EVER had a presence in the MRM 'mainstream'. To be fair, Celda has written on some men's issues at his school in the past. If any of the mods actually do activism it's him. But most of the actual moderation seems to come from ignatiusloyola and Gareth, who both appear to be bullies with little knowledge of the MRM.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:59 PM
8

Ignat and the others have a HUGE sense of entitlement to bully and push around MRAs they don't agree with. Relevant Gareth321 quote: Actually, we get to say what's considered relevant in this subreddit - you arrogant prick. (emphasis mine)
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:56 PM
3

Feminism is an enemy to men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:54 AM
1

Agree. Such posts are less interesting than image memes.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:01 AM
1

Feminism was never a good thing.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:14 AM
1

http://www.scribd.com/doc/50894938/What%E2%80%99s-Wrong-and-What%E2%80%99s-Right-with-Contemporary-Feminism She also claims that feminism is a good thing that just went wrong.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:03 AM
1

Other than the fact she wants to go into other countries to solve the "oppression" of women there by the evil mens.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:45 AM
7

Australia, Canada, and much of Europe have some pretty screwed up anti-free speech laws. It's often illegal to write politically incorrect comments. I worry about the day when the US goes down the same path. We're already well on the way. When that day comes it will be technically illegal to discuss men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:52 PM
2

0 day old accounts are insta-banned if they express conservative views, but if they concern troll or express egalitarian views the post stays. Interesting how that works.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:11 AM
0

You got a few net up-votes. So the thread wasn't received terribly badly. Who are you? Are you posting on an alt account in this thread too?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:18 PM
3

Traditionalists want complementary gender roles because men and women are not equal in outlook, ability distribution, physical form, etc. Indeed. And there are actually quite a few of these types of MRAs here. A lot of them come here and are instantly ganged up on and attacked by the "egalitarian MRAs" for daring to be traditionalists, so you don't tend to hear much from them afterward. It's pretty sad that a few very loud "egalitarian MRAs" feel the need to harass other MRAs all the time simply…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:13 PM
-1

Why do you spend so much time attacking MRAs and telling them to go away? Your hatred is showing. Perhaps you'd fair better over at Manboobz' website. He just had a hit piece on GirlWritesWhat because she agreed with much of what was in the domestic violence article. Maybe you should pick on her too, since you seem to enjoy it so much.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:08 PM
3

Yeah, the OP is a classic concern troll. This post, which got 160 net up-votes, tells us all we need to know about this issue: GirlWritesWhat: "even when you behave perfectly, if you're an MRA, feminists and others will talk **** about how you're a misogynist, hateful violent terrorist. It really doesn't matter what we do. I'm not careful about what I say and how I say it anymore, because people will believe what they want" That a bunch of people came out of the woodwork to bash MRAs here indica…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:46 PM
6

You're going to ban one of the most prolific posters in this sub-reddit for cross-posting to the meta sub-reddit? You need to reevaluate your goal here. Are you an MRA or not?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:18 PM
0

Shame on you for your bias. If men's rights issues you cared about were being arbitrarily removed I would defend you because I have principles. Anyway I'm done chatting with you. Good day.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:10 PM
0

Shame on you then.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:58 AM
0

If your racism is more important than men's rights you are a bigot and you really should evaluate your participation in the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:52 AM
6

Keep telling yourself that, hypocrite.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:46 AM
0

Why do you feel the need to support censorship of men's rights articles? Have some integrity, sheesh.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:43 AM
1

More integrity, fewer jokes please.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:36 AM
0

More integrity, fewer jokes please.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:36 AM
10

Legolas-the-elf, promoting misandry by referring to criticism of women as "misogyny". Misogyny is hatred of women, not criticism of them. You keep telling MRAs to leave when they disagree with you, but /r/feminisms is that way --->.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:35 AM
4

And now we see why the meta was created: so the mods can censor dissent when they abuse their power.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:06 AM
0

You guys should probably work on your obvious bias instead of spending time making jokes.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:06 AM
1

The point is unless you understand the cause you can't fix the problem.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:00 AM
6

Most prison rape is a black on white racially motivated crime: http://www.westernrevival.org/prison_rape.htm
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:28 PM
1

That study seems to be measuring marriage stability and not happiness. Happiness, happiness, happiness, a nebulous concept whcih is more important than families.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:22 PM
2

It is: http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:44 PM
0

Well I can at least link you this: http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:33 PM
2

They're certainly my reasons. And though many men don't really think a whole lot about why they avoid promiscuous women for long term relationships, I think their reasons are very much the same as mine.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:31 PM
2

Now you seem like you are arguing against a fictitious point of view that I don't hold. Nowhere did mayonesa mention you in particular.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:22 PM
14

Those who think less of women for having sex on some level must view men as foul. If the difference between dirty and clean for a woman is determined only by her contact with men, then it must be men who are the problem This is a fallacious argument. If I don't want to have sex with a woman who has had sex with 30 "alpha" males who each have had sex with 30 other women, it doesn't mean I hate men - it means I hate STDs.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:27 PM
7

The article started off well but stopped making sense toward the end. There are plenty of logical reasons not to want to be with promiscuous women. First of all they're more likely to have STDs and more serious ones. Second there's a higher risk of infidelity when a woman has more previous sexual partners. Third... I'm an MRA, why would I want to settle down with some woman who spent her better years riding the cock carousel and has now decided she wants to settle down with me as her provider wh…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:15 PM
1

Ah, okay, I thought you were making a judgment call rather than a summary of the piece.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:57 PM
1

Why do you keep using terms like "badthink" and "right-thinking"? I feel like I'm in 1984.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:52 PM
2

Yet they don't and won't campaign in any significant way for it. Mmhm: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ygw8b/do_men_have_the_right_to_vote/c5vhpcs Uh huh: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ygw8b/do_men_have_the_right_to_vote/c5vi0ex
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:46 PM
5

That's probably not David, his account is Manboobz. Manzboobz is an obvious troll who I've reported countless times but for some reason still hasn't been banned.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:41 PM
2

Around an eighth said they disapproved more of female promiscuity. Bad answer. Why is that a bad answer? If it's sensible to disapprove more of female promiscuity than male promiscuity, then it's a good answer. Since men and women are not the same, it may indeed be sensible to disapprove more of female promiscuity.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:25 PM
0

If you wan't something to be general, you have to use a modifier which indicates that you are not universally applying your statement. No you don't. TLDR "Jews are greedy" -- stereotype "Most Jews are greedy" -- generalization Lol, that's a great example that proves me right. When people say "Jews are greedy" it's a generalization!
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:49 AM
1

No, it's still a generalization. If he had said "each and every man is stronger than each and every woman" then that would apply in every case. Learn the language, and try not to be so rude.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:37 AM
22

Hahaha, I love how people act like questioning the victim is a bad thing I prefer the term "accuser".
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:36 AM
0

It's called a generalization, genius.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:28 AM
1

5% divorce rate vs 50% divorce rate.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:38 AM
1

What don't you understand? Traditionalism allows for a productive society and then liberalism takes it over and heads it inevitably toward the shitter. You've got the cause and effect backwards.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:43 PM
0

run a society based off of what we can know, observe, and test We aren't doing that. We're running a society based on hope and feelings. If we were running a society based on what we know, we'd look at history and see that traditional societies succeed and liberal soceities are destroyed.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:45 PM
-1

Moving forward is moving back.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:40 PM
0

You are funny.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:33 PM
2

My statement is completely relevant to the content of this thread. Stop trying to move the goalposts. This was your statement: Whenever a traditionalist says we should go back to the way things used to be, I need only point them in this direction. And I just showed you why that statement was silly.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:31 PM
2

Hm, what's more important, boys doing better in school or boys getting to openly enjoy the color pink more... hmmm let me think, that's a really hard one.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:17 PM
2

That's not a perk, Subway isn't very healthy.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:59 PM
2

A fiscal conservative feminist would oppose government regulation and action to enforce equal rights among the sexes. Christina Hoff Sommers supports going into other countries because supposedly women are oppressed there and men are not. She thinks it's important we find ways to get more women in STEM fields. The list goes on.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:09 PM
1

By the way, if you smoke less than 2 cigars a day there is no statistical increase in health effects.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:56 PM
0

Yeah, keep tellin' yourself that's why.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:55 PM
0

And I'm glad you think masculine values are "stone age" while feminism's values are just grand. Really shows where you stand.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:50 PM
0

But forcing an entire civilization to live by feminism is a great idea. /s
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:49 PM
0

Big government taxes your cigars because they cause mouth cancer, and are a burden on the health care system. No, big government taxes cigars for the same reason it taxes everything else. They like money.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:44 PM
12

Maybe. Women aren't what they used to be. Good luck.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:10 AM
15

I was lucky enough to be taught how to treat a lady Opening doors, paying for meals, walking on the traffic side when with a woman That's not lucky, that's called being a doormat, and it's a great way to get involved with the wrong woman and end up divorced and never seeing your kids.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:02 AM
0

Neither.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:34 AM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:32 AM
-2

But feminism is a thoroughly indefensible ideology. Religious zealotry, on the other hand, can have its benefits.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:01 AM
5

I just sometimes wonder what the best term to use is. Even with Leftism you get Leftists who make strange arguments about how Leftism isn't Leftism. Obfuscation I guess.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:33 AM
6

So Leftism? :)
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:25 AM
5

How would you describe feminism's political roots?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:05 AM
-5

I disagree with everything about feminism. It is a hate movement designed to tear down all that is good.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:56 PM
3

Sigil1: Advocates for gynocentrism, complains that those who argue against it are gynocentric.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:08 PM
0

If you're an egalitarian just call yourself an egalitarian. I'll call myself an MRA. By the way if you look at the definition of "bigot", you fit that definition better than someone who is not an egalitarian. "a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance" Presuming that anyone who doesn't share your views is a bigot ("fuck the bigots") …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:17 AM
11

infighting Don't be ridiculous. You've spent your time in this thread attempting to distract from the OP with your infighting.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:26 PM
6

The moral high ground? You're trolling this thread quite a bit. You don't get to claim the moral high ground.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:12 PM
1

You quit bitching. Lol.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:11 PM
1

No. I prefer to stay here.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:07 PM
1

Because I'm an MRA.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:02 PM
7

You appear to be giddy about this. That seems inappropriate.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:00 PM
-1

Apart from raising awareness about censorship, and submitting articles and comments in defense of conservatism, no.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:57 PM
10

If it was you SuicideBanana, realize that GWW is filing a lawsuit and you may very well be exposed.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:51 PM
2

If anyone deserves to be called a cunt, it's her. Not when the children are present, of course.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:28 AM
3

I noticed that there is a slight left-leaning favoritism in this sub-reddit regardless of the horrors the left is doing to men That's partly because Reddit is quite liberal and partly because the moderators encourage it. We have enough enemies at the moment. True.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:11 AM
-3

This sub-reddit is run by radical Leftists who favor censorship over discussion. They make sure to keep the discussion to their own liking, which involves catering to mainstream liberal politics.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:05 AM
5

I agree. Too many people are more worried about being politically correct than they are about being truthful.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:00 AM
4

The one with the PENIS! /s
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:52 AM
4

What's your problem with Mr. Boris?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:52 AM
2

This is totally irrelevant to the post. Grow up.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:56 AM
2

Women initiate most divorces yet somehow it's men who are taking women for granted? Wow.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:40 AM
0

You are correct. Some people care about feelings and attempt to attack anything that's "unfair" or "unequal" even when it's not sensible.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:37 AM
1

White knighting.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:35 AM
-1

http://i.imgur.com/IwrbA.png Concern troll.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:34 AM
3

r/mensrights already has a bot that makes a copy of every self-post too
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:32 AM
1

What sort of articles? I suggest looking for other sections of the internet where your articles are relevant and spreading men's rights issues there. For example, sites like the alt-right http://amerika.org occasionally deal directly with men's issues.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:31 AM
0

Concern troll.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:14 AM
0

You're denying the personal attack now? :/
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:37 AM
1

Americans have the most fucked up view of political labels anywhere. No, no, Canadians have the most fucked up view of political labels anywhere! See what I did there?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:13 AM
3

That you don't understand the difference between the right and left.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:03 AM
1

Well then they aren't very good conservatives. :) And that's my point. Even the Republicans in the US, who aren't really conservatives, are more conservative than the conservatives in Canada. Canada, overall, appears more liberal than the US.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:16 PM
2

I see the left as a bastion of victim politics.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:12 PM
1

I don't consider that conservative. Conservatives want limited government and often favor traditionalism. Modernity is defined by liberalism, though, so what they call "conservatism" now is actually quite liberal.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:12 PM
3

Don't like the moderation of a subreddit? Your option - and your only option - is to create a new subreddit or take part in a different subreddit. Actually, no, that's not my only option, just as it's not your only option to keep doing what you're doing. Don't be facile.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:10 PM
4

Not sure what your point is. But I do know that /r/libertarian and /r/new_right both participate in /r/moderationlog to provide transparency for their moderation activities. /r/mensrights does not. Might be a good idea to join up. I'll put in a request for you. Might not be a bad idea to post the /r/mensrights moderation log yourself sometime too, for transparency's sake. From what I've seen, /r/mensrights is very censorious. If you want to prove me wrong, that's a simple way of doing it.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:10 PM
5

You are trolling.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:55 PM
1

What do you think constitutes "left wing"?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:53 PM
3

I don't believe they've failed because of censorship but because r/mensrights is already established. That doesn't change the fact that censorship is common here. I suggest you take a gander at sub-reddits controlled by mayonesa, like /r/new_right, which states in the sidebar: Unlike certain liberal-controlled false "conservative" subreddits, we do not use political correctness to censor people nor do we pretend that neoconservatism is conservatism. We represent the conservative tradition in its…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:50 PM
-8

Reddit is full of immature kids, and the mods foster their paranoia with the silly rightsbot that paints every poster as a liar by default.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:42 PM
1

erm http://www.amerika.org/globalism/prole-run-america-pra/
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:39 PM
2

There's also anti-feminism university: http://fullofgraceseasonedwithsalt.blogspot.com/search/label/AFU%20(Anti-Feminism%20University)
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:38 PM
-1

personal attack in place of an argument
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:34 PM
0

That seems fairly accurate to me, not sure why it "had" to be removed.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:34 PM
1

That makes sense.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:33 PM
1

How do the conservative parties in the US and Canada compare? I would assume the "conservative" party in Canada is more liberal than even the Republican party in the US>
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:32 PM
8

Gandhi: I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence... I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honour than that she should, in a cowardly manner, become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. But I believe that nonviolence is infinitely superior to violence, forgiveness is more manly than punishment. Forgiveness adorns a soldier...But abstinence is forgiveness only when there is the power to punish; it…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:30 PM
5

It's a guilty by association fallacy. Fact is right-wingers are far less censorious than left-wingers, as even the /r/mensrights liberal mods prove. Mayonesa is a good MRA.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:24 PM
2

they test for more than the simple occurrence of sexual intercourse. Like what? Vaginal tearing, like the kind that occurs when you have rough sex or you have a big cock? "Rape kits" are meaningless. They're sex kits and nothing more. And therefore, "rape kit" is not an appropriate term for a test that in almost all cases cannot differentiate between rape and plain old sex, but are used inappropriately as evidence that rape occurred when all that's proven is sex occurred. False rape allegations …
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:43 AM
1

What did the removed comment state?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:34 AM
3

Well let's be honest, there are some "top shelf" liquors that are no better than the cheap stuff. Grey Goose, for example, is comparable to $15 potato vodka (real vodka). Patron, for example, is comparable to some $20 tequilas. Some "top shelf" gins are comparable to Gordon's, which costs $10. edit: If there was some sarcasm to your post, I didn't catch it, but if so, I guess you agree with me.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:32 AM
1

Yes, that's what I meant. Rape kit? Sex kit. "Rape kits" only prove that sex occurred, perhaps even rough sex. Not rape. And that was precisely my point.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:24 AM
1

Which is a problem. What did he say? The comment was removed for some reason.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:10 AM
1

francophones are usually very left-leaning, always about tolerance and PC From my perspective as an American it seems that most Canadians are this way.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:09 AM
2

How can a female?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:06 AM
1

It's because car insurance companies want to make a profit, and they know they can get more $$ from men with fewer complaints bout the unfairness of it. In a culture where discrimination against men is adored, discrimination against men is profitable.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:34 AM
3

Oh, and running your ass off until you can't take it anymore is good too. Sprint, like you would if you were chasing an animal down or running away from a predator.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:10 AM
5

One of the major goals of feminism is to destroy all male authority over women. A basic tenet of feminism is a woman can do whatever she wants, and demand that men do what she says. But a man can only do what a woman wants, what a woman demands. Feminism is female superiority and male subjugation.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:08 AM
3

"Nice" is just another word for "chump". Don't be a chump.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:07 AM
-3

I don't think there's any civilization in existence that's MORE oppressive to women than it is to men.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:04 AM
-1

primary primary primary primary The primary weapon of liberals is PC. Liberals are the primary users of PC. To not understand this is to pretend that PC is a concept on its own with no relation to who primarily uses it. Foolishness.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:03 AM
4

It's also good to avoid processed foods, sugars, and anything with high fructose corn syrup in it.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:01 AM
-1

Liberals, including feminists, are the only group that uses PC as its primary weapon to censor opposing views. That's just the truth. Man.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 11:18 PM
-7

It's kind of amusing to see traditional cultures giving feminists a voice. They don't know what a huge mistake they're making.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 11:17 PM
-5

one weapon in the arsenal of individuals who desire to impose their personal beliefs on others, and cannot abide being contradicted, much less debunked Also known as liberals, masters of censorship through political correctness.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 06:06 PM
-11

Nor do women.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:43 AM
1

Thanks for the PM but it appears you've been censored. I think I shall investigate this topic further.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:57 PM
0

It depends on who is doing the subjugating. When men were in charge women had it pretty good. Now that women are in charge the same is not true for men.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:48 PM
-2

I wager the woman is a feminist. :)
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:47 PM
1

Don't forget black, yellow, white, and brown.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:46 PM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:45 PM
-6

Women don't want equality.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:37 PM
4

Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:37 PM
0

The OP.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:59 AM
-2

You can thank Pigman for being a disingenuous liberal.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:49 AM
1

Etymology of the word "nice": late 13c., "foolish, stupid, senseless," from O.Fr. nice "silly, foolish," from L. nescius "ignorant," lit. "not-knowing," from ne- "not" (see un-) + stem of scire "to know" (see science). http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=nice&searchmode=none It makes sense. An overly nice person is just looking to be manipulated and used. I don't think I want to be "nice".
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:36 PM
1

Your bigotry is showing. If you're going to make an argument, don't use hateful terms.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:39 AM
8

It never was needed. Men are more interested in sports.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 08:51 PM
2

Don't need one, I have a record of the facts readily available: /r/AboutMensRights Nice insult though. Very mature.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:51 AM
-1

Seriously, I don't have time for vacuous drivel. Don't talk to me, thanks.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:27 AM
-1

Honestly, stop talking to me.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:24 AM
1

It is harassment regardless. Harassment is used to silence opposition.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:23 AM
2

The conservatives are just really loud. No, you just ban them. Other than that, Reddit does have a liberal bias, but it's grown far more significant since you began banning, harassing, and censoring MRAs.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:22 AM
1

No, I won't.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:54 PM
1

Hm perhaps, but men inevitably are going to want to interact with women. I see a large difference between a feminist who talks about women's needs as superior and a men's rights activist who focuses on men's interactions with women.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:53 PM
1

That's not what I meant and you know it. No, I don't. What are you babbling about?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:51 PM
2

No, you really don't.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:50 PM
0

He also allows liberals to repeatedly harass MRAs, for example Sigil1 has been harassing users in this thread, and is given no warning. But when conservatives respond in kind, they face severe consequences, which include banning.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:44 PM
1

It IS rape regardless of what the LAW says. The LAW does not define REALITY.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:41 PM
1

You're misusing that word.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:41 PM
3

Nobody should have safe spaces I didn't say safe spaces. I said spaces. And men need their own spaces apart from women.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:40 PM
-1

Quotes from the user who was banned: ignatiusloyola himself has a history of attacking conservative-leaning MRAs: http://www.reddit.com/r/AboutMensRights/comments/n4lg8/rmensrights_moderator_ignatiusloyolas_habit_of/ And the moderators continue to insta-ban conservative MRAs who join /r/mensrights, ignoring their own moderation policy: http://www.reddit.com/r/AboutMensRights/comments/x6e8z/rmensrights_moderators_are_on_a_campaign_to/ That's strange, I thought Reddit had a voting system so that u…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:39 PM
3

Indeed. It should be the responsibility of male MRAs to make sure to cater to women so that their male spaces are more welcoming to females, nice and gentle and comfortable and feminine-friendly, so that women never feel uncomfortable there. Men certainly don't deserve their own spaces or their own way of doing things, and by golly if a woman is offended by a men's rights site then she's going to stamp her feet and complain, and go over to Reddit and disparage the users of that site because thos…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 02:36 AM
2

Not sure about the blog itself though.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:14 PM
0

No. It is not possible to be both. It is possible to identify as both, if one is cognitively dissonant.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:46 AM
-1

Wow, hate men much?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:45 AM
-2

It is a gendered issue. The government uses its power to harm men and to transfer wealth from men to women. Government power is the major force of misandry today.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:29 PM
-8

Of course not. Planned Parenthood is extremely anti-male.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:13 AM
5

Can you say human rights abuse?
/r/MensRights21/03/12 05:10 PM
9

Good article. It is neither the Internet nor the anonymous commentary it provides that has brought about the ongoing revolution of the male perspective concerning what once used to be known as “the fair sex.” It is, rather, the result of the first generation steeped in feminist propaganda from kindergarten to college graduation reaching an age where their voices are finally being heard. And the voice of the male half of Generation X and those generations following it is a contemptuous one indeed…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 07:40 AM
-2

A list of wants isn't very useful without an idea of how to achieve them. And that is the difference between a men's rights activist and a whiner.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:27 AM
1

Reported for spamming.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter