Why we won't be seeing male birth control in the near future.

Pecanpig · 2012-11-19T03:05:17+00:00

Giving men control of their own reproduction would lessen women's power, no shit they won't support it.

Glori-USBastard · 2012-11-19T03:40:05+00:00

Appreciate the shout out Minorthreat77.

To CypherdTraitor: The product actually would not be a multi-billion dollar product; but maybe a multi-million dollar product or Big Pharma would have produced a variety of male pills and gells decades ago.

The real reason is multi-faceted; but I will stick with big pharma for now. The facts are this; take RISUG from India for example.

RISUG is a shot taken once every ten years; or until you want to have kids. Then thats it! All it takes is another shot to remove it. Much easier to do than a vasectomy; and completely reversible with no side effects! NONE! It is also going to be very cheap. Also again, did I mention needed once every ten years?

This is the "rub" so to speak. Big Pharma is all about money; and feminists and government are all about control. If men can sleep with women to their hearts content, and never marry nor worry about child birth; then women won't have to worry about the Roe V Wade decision. Men won't even care; because they will hold all the cards.

Married, and want to have a baby? Better hope he got the 2nd shot done and is not hiding it from you. Planning on telling him you are on birth control? What for? Again, he does not care because he already had the shot; he is just not telling you.

If ever you decide to have kids; he can refrain from telling you he never got the second shot to remove RISUG; or just pretend he is shooting blanks (because he is, shsssh).

Basically, this drug alone would remove the advantage of abortion and the pill from women overnight. This is why feminists and the FDA will never allow it here. Family Courts, and the gynocentric economy and its supporters would lose the multiple access points to the younger generations pocketbook and future earnings overnight.

So you can say whatever you like; no pill/gel/patch/surgery that benefits men like I talk about is on the horizon in the USA for this reason. Men will have to take it from the government and feminists. Once awareness reaches a tipping point on just this topic; feminism will become thoroughly beaten. Feminists are not wise or smart; but they are cunning enough to see the game changer before it comes It is obvious they have planned accordingly.

TheJollySatan · 2012-11-19T05:39:05+00:00

I think it is more likely short term greed will overcome long term prospects for profit in this regard. All it takes is on pharm company with an effect patent to flip the finger to the rest of them.

actanonverba8 · 2012-11-19T06:33:47+00:00

That article is quite good. He is right that feminists (likely most women too) are not indifferent on this. They want all the reproductive power to themselves. Naturally, this is just another of the long, long line of examples which make it painstakingly obvious feminism is about female supremacy and not equality.

Gantry · 2012-11-19T02:27:05+00:00

This is dumb. The male birth control pill, like the condom, would be a multi-billion dollar product.

The reason it hasn't been made yet is because of biological factors. The female birth control pill exacerbates a natural period of infertility. The male birth control pill would have to create a period of infertility where none existed.

Title	Why we won't be seeing male birth control in the near future.
Author	minorthreat77
Upvotes	3
Comments	11
Date	November 18, 2012 10:44 PM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/13f2p3/why_we_wont_be_seeing_male_birth_control_in_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/why-we-wont-be-seeing-male-birth-control-in-the.1008911 https://theredarchive.com/post/1008911

Comments