TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pecanpig Archive

View 9 posts and 10,765 comments by Pecanpig on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 10,765 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Her proportions actually aren't unrealistic and are pretty typical of comics, and she's not Spiderman.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:08 PM
15

Pants are sexist, cis scum.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:25 PM
12

Read them again.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:24 PM
21

Feminism, condemning all positive emotions since forever.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:24 PM
1

I'd say it's pretty harmful at that point, socially.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:17 PM
4

In my opinion it's worse than than, it's not even "How so?" but "How much?", most of the time they are offended for absolutely no reason, real or imaginary.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:15 PM
24

We live in the 21st century, they live in the 8th.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:20 PM
1

Interesting?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:34 PM
1

Seriously though, in men's rooms I've seen piss on the seat but in women's rooms I've seen piss and BLOOD on the floor, everywhere.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:07 PM
1

I genuinely don't know what "bux" is supposed to mean.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:27 AM
0

Coincidence.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:17 AM
1

This study provides evidence that society sees "Alpha fux beta bux" as immoral. I don't know what that means.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:16 AM
0

Better plan, go there and use their washrooms but don't buy anything.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:15 AM
1

They almost certainly have a website.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:14 AM
1

Batter plan, use the women's room because they can't (legally) do anything other than redirect you to the non-existent men's room.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:14 AM
-4

I don't want to shit in a stall covered in used tampons, so no thanks.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:13 AM
1

Is that written in lipstick?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:09 AM
4

Didn't they also throw acid in peoples faces?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:01 AM
-2

MtF trans people are more likely to be attacked than any other group of people, and also more often have their rights breached. Do you have proof of this? I couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 01:02 PM
1

So what?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 01:02 PM
1

They have a different course?...never mind, I thought a woman actually achieved something.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:24 PM
1

This guy.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:23 PM
0

Except for that one naked guy who blew through like half the course in 12 seconds.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:53 AM
1

They don't even support equal rights, just equal (positive) outcomes.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:55 PM
1

But not everything is both harmless and annoying.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:50 PM
2

Tons of people can't wrap their heads around that idea that "equal" doesn't mean "better" for them.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 10:28 AM
2

Regulating =/= restricting.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 10:27 AM
2

Girl goes around slapping guys asses - Prank?? Harmless? Check. Annoying? Check. Funny to somebody? Check. Yep, this is a prank.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 10:22 AM
1

It has been tried, it hasn't lasted long enough for anyone to notice. Women do that stuff to compete with other women, not for men who generally couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:38 PM
2

Devils Advocate: It's good for dogs.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:16 AM
2

That only works for women, sadly.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 08:03 PM
1

Very cool. And that about sums up my opinion.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:01 AM
1

Dove just earned itself another sale, the great material continuum triumphs again.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:54 PM
3

I remember when trolling was trolling instead of just being an annoying twat.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:51 PM
2

Obvious troll is far to obvious.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:49 PM
5

Does that have any relevance with getting a vaccine?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:49 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that women's tennis actually has different rules as well.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:48 PM
2

Under law males cannot be raped in many places.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 01:00 PM
2

Sometimes gender segregation is the only viable option.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:56 PM
3

Not if you define misogyny as "hatred of women and girls".
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:13 PM
7

I hate to say it but if Reddit were a guy it would be a moderate Red Pill guy.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:01 PM
4

Not directly, no.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:52 PM
1

The whole thing is a joke...so lets have a laugh at it.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:51 PM
1

Yes of course.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:49 AM
1

Like plea bargains?...
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:47 AM
6

Me: "Why yes officer I did rob that bank." ------ Police: "May I ask why you're admitting this now, on record, verified by a polygraph?" Me: "Yes, I know that polygraphs are nothing but pseudo-science, I can say that Godzilla helped me out and the polygraph will affirm this." ------
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:46 AM
1

I think that affirmed intent is what matters. (For the record I define sexual harassment simply as harassment of a sexual nature, nothing more.) If someone were to walk up to me on the street and start talking to me about the problems around a current construction project then that's annoying but fine, but if I tell them I'm not interested and they follow me then that's crossing the line from innocent annoyance to intentful harassment. Same goes with sexual harassment, if someone were to slap me…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:38 AM
1

Probably not.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:28 AM
13

Because them people will give a shit.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:09 PM
1

No idea.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:11 PM
1

No, mostly because I've never owned one.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:06 PM
1

A) Most of the world isn't circumcised. B) Forced genital mutilation of infants is bad, no explanation needed.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:52 PM
1

Depends on your definitions, is self identification enough or do you need to meet a standard?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:48 PM
2

I'm not allowed to kill people even though the actions are purely those of my own body, just not the repercussions.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:47 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that MHA are just dedicated trolls.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:44 PM
2

Maybe he is targeting women to target men.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 12:49 AM
9

He was mocking the Feminist argument.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 12:48 AM
2

Fair enough, but most of us simply don't care and if someone wants the right to wear a dress then more power to them, it doesn't effect anything else directly.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 02:36 AM
1

I don't, I just don't see how it should be.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:35 AM
2

I disagree, we're polite but not necessarily politically correct. Feminists can continue to shit all over things and will loose even more public support because of it.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 12:03 AM
1

Of course, but why do you think this is worth bringing up?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:01 AM
1

Why can't we do both? If there's a simple case of two rallies and you can only go to one I'm pretty sure the one for prison rape would receive WAY more support, but this is the internet and it's easy to vocally support both.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 11:48 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:43 PM
1

Sounds like you had a run of bad luck, that's not quite the norm. We also get a fuckload of concern trolls who say similar things with the intent of distracting us and generally causing turmoil.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 11:40 PM
4

I'm pretty sure that people hate bankers and businessmen because many of them are flat out evil.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 06:59 AM
-5

The differences in the defence systems used by the Abrams and T-90. Not exactly on topic, but you did ask.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:06 AM
0

Fair enough. What if the comment was 90% personal attacks and other logical fallacies?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:05 AM
0

When are personal attacks ever relevant to the topic at hand?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:32 AM
6

To what end? To effectively communicate finer points.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:32 AM
-2

I guess 'deliberately rude' would have been more accurate.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:27 AM
1

In a clear and civil manner devoid from personal attacks, I guess.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:12 AM
0

How?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:09 AM
1

Being civil, acting like a mature adult rather than an animal or a small child.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:06 AM
3

Which I sum up as being rude, but last I checked being rude doesn't make you the most hated community on Reddit.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 02:58 AM
3

And this is why I don't hate this sub, you can disagree properly. That said I don't see how female only scholarships and lower standards could be considered anything other than an advantage.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 02:57 AM
6

I didn't say that, what I say or at least imply was that equal doesn't necessarily mean better or superior. Affirmative Action gives women more opportunity than men, removing it would give men and women equal opportunity but women would have less than they have now.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 02:53 AM
2

We could be considered a related group but hardly supplicated, they hate us and we dislike them.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 02:42 AM
10

Neither do we over at /r/mensrights but we don't receive NEARLY as much hate as you.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 02:31 AM
0

I really couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:31 AM
1

Addition: Female judges have less of a bias for females in sentencing disparity. No I don't have a on-hand source for this.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:14 AM
2

I'm a bisexual (technically pansexual) Considering that there are only 2 distinct genders, isn't this the same thing?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:58 AM
1

I agree, the leatherback sea turtle is a serious issue.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:57 AM
1

I think this question can be developed into a really robust dialogue. I've read the comments, nope.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:56 AM
0

My issue is that LGBT men aren't being taken seriously in this sub, and so you dismiss my concern and ask me to talk about something else you see as more valid. Legit. So say something, talk about the issues which you face for being a gay man. Bitching about being gay or ignored isn't a valid subject, deal with it.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:53 AM
1

Exclusionary tactics, dismissiveness, and assignment to secondary status? Absolutely. Are you referring to how we don't care if you're a lesbian, gay, bisexual or whatever the T stands for?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:49 AM
-1

No :/
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:46 AM
2

No, I won't support the hijacking of another movement for political reasons.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:43 AM
1

I was banned for asking a question. There was a linked article with some confusing wording which could easily be interpreted multiple ways, I asked which way it was meant to be interpreted, insta-banned.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:39 AM
1

Is the judges gender really worth bringing up?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:39 AM
9

Leave.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:33 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:08 AM
1

Okay?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:43 AM
1

No idea.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:30 AM
1

I hate that illustration, it's like a black-or-white fallacy in colour. A more accurate illustration would depict 2 men and 1 woman standing on single boxes to watch the event and then 1 woman sitting on a single box, the sitting woman can stand if she wants to but she's generally uninterested in this event. The sitting woman shouldn't be given 5 extra boxes to put her on-par with the standing men and women and this is especially true when the men sit down and don't get any extra boxes. (This co…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:08 AM
1

I don't think that gender or race should carry any weight and should be ignored whenever possible. Google can of course discriminate as they see fit but that doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:43 AM
1

I'm not asking Google I'm asking you.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:17 AM
1

I'm on the fence about this one; on the one hand banning gang members seems reasonable but on the other hand it's largely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:50 PM
14

It's spelled "womyn", shitlord.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:47 PM
1

So what if most programmers are male?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:44 PM
0

If only the captain would send the judge a 1000lb explanation as to why ca can't appear in court, oh well.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:42 PM
2

In theory you'd be golden so long as they couldn't prove you did it.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:50 AM
3

Wouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:42 AM
2

when will enough be enough? When the shit hits them in the face.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:39 AM
-2

So how does dress codes, WHICH INVOLVES MEN AS WELL, an indicator of 'misogyny' in the Iranian society? Because Patriarchy™.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:39 AM
2

"Meh." I'd need more information to form an opinion.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:34 AM
1

Not much but more than nothing.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:12 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:07 PM
1

Or they don't feel like answering, for all I know they get asked this 50 times a day.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:07 PM
1

Or brutally fucked...relevant username?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:05 PM
1

Devils Advocate: Unless they receive proper funding they can't really have larger numbers.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:04 PM
1

Would you like me to call you a cab back to your bridge?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:00 PM
1

Tell him to fuck right off.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:16 AM
2

Its integrity.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:14 AM
0

Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:05 AM
2

I'm not sure I understand the question of how the vandalism is vandalism...do you need a definition?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:56 AM
-1

Good.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:52 AM
8

The whole page is vandalism.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:51 AM
8

Feminists, idolizing Valerie Solanas over Jeannette Rankin since forever.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:51 AM
2

Plainly tell him that it's inappropriate and to stop.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:49 AM
3

My guess? Evolutionary psychology, women have been plainly more valuable for the vast majority of human and pre-human existence.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:47 AM
0

It's not my job to google things for you.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:45 AM
7

What would you say the real differences are between an egalitarian and an MRA?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:52 AM
1

The difference is that at other points in life it's likely their own fault, that's not possible at infancy.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:51 AM
0

"Meh", find your own Norwegian people to confirm this.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:49 AM
-1

TL;DR: The instant they stopped any kind of affirmative action or 'positive' discrimination women went back to doing what they wanted to do. (Nursing, child care, gradeschool teaching, etc etc.)
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:46 PM
3

I'm sure there's a name for that job, I don't remember what it is but it's not 'FBI field agent". Edit: I think it might be "counselor", it's a low-end job which generally earns near minimum wage or is volunteer.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:42 AM
1

Actually it's only 3.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:39 AM
3

What?...
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:38 AM
2

So you were either to scrawny to be of use in the military, topheavy to an extreme, wore yourself out by 40 or are lying. Or a mutant.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:08 AM
6

I couldn't care less, if they can't quote me then they'll make something up and attribute it to me anyways.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:02 AM
3

Why not?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:29 AM
2

Yes. She had a job which should be valued, normally that value is paid through being supported but if circumstances mandate a divorce then she needs to be paid somehow. That said our current system is absolute shit.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:26 AM
-1

40 is pretty fucking high.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:54 AM
0

What makes you think that females are necessary?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:53 AM
2

All of them.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:50 AM
2

I had a Feminist hit me with a book, and I know damned well that if I hit her back that I would have been arrested.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:46 AM
4

There was a piece on NPR a while back that said the best thing for getting girls interested in STEM jobs is to have a lot of women already in STEM jobs around them. Norway has proven this to be false, the instant you stop affirmative action then women choose other things.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:23 PM
2

What Feminists call misogyny we and most everyone else call equality, justice, fairness, possibly sport, etc etc.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:32 AM
1

Because it would make us sound dumb, so we should let them continue to do it.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:31 AM
1

No. Alrighty then.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:34 PM
1

Story Summary Shelbyville cheerleading coach accused of having relations with 17-year-old student This isn't rape.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:56 PM
1

Because they were told to.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:52 PM
1

Does it actually say anything about fathers reading to their children in comparison to mothers reading to their children?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:34 PM
0

I'm not joking, I think that if we help Feminism along with shooting itself in the foot then it will bleed out and die.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:28 AM
-2

It's simple, we kill Feminism.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:16 PM
1

1) No. 2) Equality of opportunity vs equality of result, they are mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:56 PM
1

Equal also can't be equal.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:54 PM
3

From the first few lines, that doesn't seem to bad.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:51 PM
1

1) You aren't a Feminist by any definition which I recognize or care about, end of story. 2) Why do you support parity rather than equality of opportunity?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 01:19 AM
1

1) You do not meet any relevant definition of Feminism and as such are not a Feminist in my books, simple as that. I make this point because I think it is important to distinguish Feminism from genuine equality and people who support it. 2) You're technically correct but I think there is a difference in sentiment between enhancing something up to its intended level of functionality and enhancing it beyond that point.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:26 PM
1

I'm fine with saying that they make up the majority and more importantly that the rest of them allow it.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:46 PM
1

1) An outside observer. 2) I disagree, there's a difference between treating a disfunction and enhancing said function.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:04 PM
1

1) You do not represent Feminism. 2) Which could be prescribed for a medical condition, not for 'sexual enhancement'.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:11 PM
0

1) Feminists and Feminism are quite adverse to contraceptive equality/parity. 2) Viagra is to treat erectile dysfunction just the same as antibiotics are to treat infections, I don't know what the female equivalent would be.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:32 PM
1

TIL Feminism is dead and has been for a century.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:16 PM
0

Does the MRM address trans men and trans issues? Why? Not directly although there may be some overlap. How does MRM treat trans men and trans issues? I don't care. I see a lot of support for trans people in Feminism (TERFs excluded, but from what I've seen, they are a minority) and while I know you're not strictly anti-feminist, how do you address this? I don't. Of what importance do you consider trans issues? Why? I am largely ignorant of trans issues, but considering that they could only effec…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:03 PM
-1

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:00 PM
1

the coveted outcome from each is equality, yes? No.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:56 PM
1

That's not rape, that's sex with regret.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:53 PM
-1

One is inappropriate and the other is stupid, 'meh' just about sums up my opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:24 PM
2

That's just some stupid and fictional crap, nothing more.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:22 PM
2

Or possibly a people as a whole, the Soviets lost close to 80% of their young men in the second world war, that's an entire generation wiped out.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:53 AM
1

"worst"
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:50 AM
25

I see what you did there, English.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:25 AM
0

No.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:45 PM
2

Loaded question.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:39 PM
2

It's porn....
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:35 PM
20

Poes Law strikes again.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:30 PM
1

How do you deal with the fact that most Feminists do not fit the dictionary definition of Feminism?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:28 PM
1

Does what?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:23 AM
1

You forgot the most important one which is the environment.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:20 AM
27

Devils Advocate: Men are expected to act that way, if someone did the right thing and simply tried to calm both of you down and figure out what happened then they would also be the badguy in societies eyes.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 10:09 PM
6

It's Korea, they don't have a problem with sexism out of principle.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:14 PM
1

I'm generally against prostitution but that's all this is, not misandry.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:12 PM
5

That would imply that there was a crime.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:50 PM
1

Not in the same way or to the same level though.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:18 AM
4

And most boobs are considered to be beautiful anyways, so meh.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:32 PM
1

Yes there is, and I think you're well on the "can't" side.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:24 PM
7

I'd call the wambulance, but I don't think the gurney can lift that either.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 05:11 PM
1

My point is that that's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:56 PM
1

Or so you think...
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:55 PM
2

It's also in the bests of interests to do what druglords say, that doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:30 PM
1

Ok first of all you should mention almost immediately what your gender is. No.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:28 PM
2

50/50 Even if that's not the case in this case it is a very common case and I can't entirely blame those men for getting mad. Ignore them and do your job, and stop sleeping with coworkers. Edit: After reading some of your comments in this thread I'm changing my view. Yes it's morally wrong that you slept your way to the top, and I don't think your mechanical skills are as good as you think they are.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:26 PM
2

I'm just guessing here but that 63% figure might be correct depending on how you define "low wage", if he's referring to the poor or destitute then it's absolutely not true but if he's just referring to the bottom 50% them he probably is. My response would be "And?" All he has done is state what he perceives as a fact, not a problem or a potential solution.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:22 PM
70

No. Yes.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 02:52 PM
1

Stay at home mothers do something.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:13 PM
1

Idiot until proven troll, a variation of innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:56 AM
4

A) They really do not want to be a default sub, so they shouldn't be. B) It's funnier than balls that they are a default sub.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:55 AM
2

Most criminals have a distinct gender, not that is matters outside of taking statistics.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:14 PM
115

Truly an example of female privilege.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:34 AM
5

The implication isn't that all men are rapists but that all or at least most rapists are men. Still incorrect but very different.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:32 AM
0

Which is COMPLETELY different from "The whole goal of a terrorist is to use violence to gain media and government attention".
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:17 AM
0

Weird :/
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:55 PM
1

So long as it's funny then I don't care, if it's not funny then I won't laugh.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:27 PM
-3

No, just no.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:26 PM
1

A valid point.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:13 PM
1

I haven't observed this.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:13 PM
1

On second thought, nevermind.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:08 PM
0

Female fluids, foreskin.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:46 AM
6

50/50 Women are in a way more necessary for medical reasons (breast milk) so it kinda depends on why people are getting parental leave.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:41 AM
1

Even we got fucked up from front page exposure.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:32 AM
0

I think it's a god thing. Feminism literally cannot survive in a figurative 'open air' environment, it will fester and die.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:31 AM
-1

Devils Advocate: Overconfident men tend to come off as confident while overly confident women tend to come off as arrogant, there is a difference.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:23 AM
4

Acid, it needs to be acid at that point.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:44 PM
2

You spelled "shitlord" wrong.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:42 PM
0

Real.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:39 PM
1

Do you have quotas in Australia? In Canada we don't (officially) have quotas for military roles and I can't see them happening anytime soon. That said, this new system seems designed specifically to compliment a quota system where you can discriminate based more on race and gender than on qualifications.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:22 PM
1

In Canada we also have different standards for combat and non-combat roles. The problem I'm noticing with the new tests however is that they are designed to selectively push people through. Contrary to popular belief simply meeting the requirements isn't supposed to be enough, you need to be better than the other people who meet the requirements but with this new system they have a static "good enough" and then they can pick whoever they want, i.e Badass McLumberjack who can swordfight Delta For…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:48 PM
1

No, unless you're buying some massively cheap muffins.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:40 AM
6

Depending on what kind of bear you're talking about you could get another 20% off.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:39 AM
1

What do I get for being s superconductor?...
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:23 AM
1

My country (Canada) says it's doing a similar thing, and it's lying through its teeth. Irrelevant anyways, the 'standards' should only be an absolute minimum before you're not even considered for the job with the highest scoring people being picked, the problem is that even with restructured standards the scoring mechanism is still slanted. I could beat a woman by 1 point in every way she will still score significantly higher than me.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:08 AM
2

Probably not.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:53 PM
17

My understanding is that Feminists also supported women having lower military standards...not contradictory, just relevant.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:14 PM
1

It's not really a part of our 'ideology' and individuals can have different opinions. I'm generally against it. Ironically enough I would define myself as pro-choice but anti-abortion as there are plenty of choices which can render abortion an obsolete crime from another age.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:36 AM
19

It's just a bot which records original post content, it's to make sure you don't get positive feedback and then change your post to something like "Womyns should get back to them kitchen, AMIRITE?" to try and deceive people.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:29 AM
2

It's to stop the spambots, most of which are detected and shadowbanned before they make a single post.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:03 PM
1

The spam bots...not the vote bots.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:03 PM
-1

Shadowbans are a necessity against bots.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:02 PM
1

K&Y jelly is a surgical lubricant....
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:12 PM
1

I would troll her by talking about baking.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:11 PM
3

You can't reason someone out of a position that they weren't reasoned into to begin with.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:05 PM
0

Which part?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:57 PM
1

Bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:17 PM
-2

A) nobody is going to start a war with Russia. B) Russian women might make semi-competent soldiers C) No.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:16 PM
9

"You're"
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:16 PM
0

They said similar things in the 50's.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:16 PM
5

Anger and hatred are different things.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:57 AM
0

Probably. Next question: Does this post belong in /r/mensrights? Answer: No.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:20 PM
0

Re-read what I said you colossal moron. And they probably don't.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 09:47 AM
0

Thank you for confirming my statement.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 09:44 AM
0

There are no male domestic violence shelters.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:51 AM
2

Yes. No.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:09 AM
1

Every heard of a dress code?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:07 AM
1

If a woman is only interested in flirtation but leads a man on to believe otherwise then that's not different than the other situations.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:03 AM
5

Bitch please, I got banned for asking for a clarification on one part of a linked article.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:33 PM
8

Devils Advocate: We only have 1 main subreddit, they have like 50 with overlapping communities.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:32 PM
6

bum
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:29 PM
-1

Would you add the old definition for historical context?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:01 PM
2

Trolls do it more than once.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:56 AM
3

He said trolls, not dissenting opinions.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:24 AM
2

Because it won't stop them, if we ban them all then they will all just make new accounts in 30 seconds and continue trolling with a new identity and without the troll tag.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:22 AM
1

The relevant one.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:21 AM
0

I'd see statutory rape as 3rd or even a hypothetical 4th degree :/
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:32 AM
2

You're probably right, but I still think the best course of action is to tell OP to get mental help and nothing more. Best case scenario? OP isn't a troll, doesn't kill himself and releases a good book. Worst case scenario? OP makes an xpost to try and troll us but this won't be effective if we just try to help. Truly worst case scenario? OP makes an xpost and /r/rage sees us making fun of some suicidal internet dweller.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:07 AM
2

I respectfully disagree.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 12:05 AM
1

I didn't know TRP had any women in it :/
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 12:02 AM
3

An assumption we cannot afford to make.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:10 PM
1

Don't we already have different degrees of rape? Statutory and actual? I can't see any good coming from this. I will likely end up like assault where punishment is largely based on who's bigger.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:56 PM
1

Pfft, I'm not a woman so no thanks, I'll bring some real liquor.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 09:45 PM
2

I'll bring the popcorn if someone else brings the lawn chairs.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 09:15 PM
2

Ovaries are a pretty important part of being a woman.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:31 AM
-1

What a moron.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:36 AM
2

Put those genes in the X chromosome, make it so they only activate under X circumstances, done.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:19 AM
1

They don't even claim that :/
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:17 AM
1

A good idea would be to use caps appropriately.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:14 AM
1

We're not a brigade, go away.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:13 AM
1

I meant context to justify your post, and they recently made a bunch of trains female-exclusive.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:28 PM
1

If you add some context and maybe the female-only train thing then this might be relevant to /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:10 PM
4

I made it to 1:37.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:30 PM
1

And?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:26 PM
1

Not really, just uncaring.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 06:36 PM
2

Lazyness. "Well I could file a restraining order, or just accuse him of rape."
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:23 PM
2

A false accuser should get the same punishment as the accused would have gotten or be blacklisted from police and stuff.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:08 PM
1

Why would malicious intent be necessary?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:08 PM
26

Congrats, you just declared that Feminism never happened.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:32 AM
2

Educate her.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:30 AM
0

Not really. Why? Feminist ideology is at odds with men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:29 AM
2

Go away, troll.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:28 AM
1

Depends on how many you want to be.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 11:39 PM
1

Male nurses can get higher pay for doing that.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 11:37 PM
1

A) Try to ignore her. B) Don't let your female contemporaries be alone with patients, and make them know it.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 11:36 PM
1

I think what he's saying is that they wouldn't be able to understand anything from Christina Hoff Sommers or Warren Farrel without a certain level of education.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 11:29 PM
3

We're at-odds with a lot of ideologies.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:58 PM
3

We don't need a name change and changing it would be in and of itself harmful to the movement.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:56 PM
1

Cough cough, estrogen pollution, cough cough.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:56 PM
1

She doesn't have any degree.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:49 PM
0

"baking" is what you do to make cookies, "getting baked" is the phrase you're looking for.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:48 PM
2

If you edit your post so as to make it legible then I'll read it and respond to it, until then. Seriously though it's like a 9 year old girl wrote this on a smartphone with her thumb up her ass.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:47 PM
3

Sweden did try to pass a male-only tax a while ago...it made it to parliament and got ~20% support.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:30 PM
1

Come back with a real account and proof of your intentions.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:29 PM
1

This is already the case.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:20 PM
3

I'm pretty sure that was an April Fools joke, with some satire.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:19 PM
4

No.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:18 PM
1

It has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 04:49 PM
1

Dont u patronize me shitlord! /s
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 12:37 AM
2

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:01 PM
8

Saying something is a right, being listened to is a privilege.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:42 PM
0

Fat and skinny can be changed though.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:41 PM
1

And?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:39 PM
1

None available, this is something I read in /r/mensrights the better part of a year ago.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 09:19 PM
32

I still find it interesting simply because men don't.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 05:09 PM
15

If you compare their scale to ours, they are.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 03:22 PM
75

I remember reading a similar study where they simply showed pictures of 'average' men and women to each other, women found ~25% of men attractive while men found ~80% of women attractive but the interesting part is when they got rid of the lowest scoring pictures and men found ~95% of the remaining women attractive and women found ~25% of the remaining men attractive, so they removed the lowest scoring male pictures *again& and ran it again and women found ~25% of men attractive. Just something …
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 03:20 PM
-9

I've never seen or heard of the former happening.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:48 AM
1

I was unaware of the former...doesn't invalidate my point though, Feminists hate comic books and everything related to them.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:27 AM
1

50/50
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:24 AM
-18

Nobody addresses someone as "bimbo", it's just a label for the 3rd part.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:59 AM
6

Am I the only one who sees this as borderline brigading?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:33 AM
0

Same with Superman in many ways.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:31 AM
1

I'm not criticizing TRP, I'm just drawing lines of distinction.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 01:11 AM
8

And D.I.Y crafting is #1...I think that puts into perspective how insane the writer is.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:46 AM
1

They're rude as fuck and extremely vocal.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:40 AM
2

That's a pretty solid similarity though, we can both agree on how the world is but where we want to fix problems they want to abuse them.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:40 AM
-11

Downvoted for misleading title.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:35 AM
64

4chan, politically incorrect enough to get away with stuff like this, and then there's Battletoads.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:34 AM
3

They equate everything as with them or against them, so what does it matter?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:24 AM
1

Sorry, I only skimmed through your post.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:24 AM
2

Meh, I prefer full bodied women (fuck people who misuse that term), big firm breasts and all. That woman looks more like a girl to me, compared to western women anyways.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 12:31 AM
1

Actually, their waists stay the same, it's just the hips and chests which grow more.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:22 AM
0

Leverage.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:06 AM
2

I think we can all agree that /r/melissadebling is about as ideal as a womans body can get.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:05 AM
0

Even they aren't bad enough to be #1, or even in the top 10.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:01 AM
2

Well, tough shit. To each his own. Although I don't understand what those attributes could possible be, at least not in a woman.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 11:44 PM
3

For 7.3477×1022 kg of barbecue ribs that is a risk I am willing to take. (And I think the solar radiation would have sterilized them.)
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 11:34 PM
2

Depends on taste, but for the sake of argument lets assume both are 10/10 for their respective ethnic groups. /r/melissadebling is what I'm thinking of for the British one.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 11:31 PM
2

Very?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 10:49 PM
1

Shit...you're probably right.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 10:49 PM
2

Obvious answer is obvious, yes.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 10:46 PM
2

Yes.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:57 PM
3

Most people would choose the 5'2", 95lb Thai girl over a blimp, but would you pick the 5'2", 95lb Thai girl over the 5'5", 120lb English girl who grew up in Thailand?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:37 PM
1

You learn either way.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:35 PM
4

Abuse the stock market.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:35 PM
1

You're missing the point entirely.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:20 PM
2

Then please quote the part which you having trouble understanding, I'll try to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:10 PM
2

Re-read my previous comments.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:04 PM
9

It's not about activists, it's about military pretending to be activists.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:02 PM
2

I suppose suggesting women stay out of college would be victim blaming?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:53 PM
2

Latvian cameras were the first to be mass produced, and everything was blurry or 'looked like a potato.'
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:53 PM
3

Short answer: No. Long answer: It depends. If you're saying that men should pay less taxes because Patriarchy™ then you can go fuck yourself, but if you're saying that men should pay less taxes because men are ineligible for many tax funded programs then sure, so long as the end goal is egalitarian in nature. Same goes for voting, if you're saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote because women are stupid then you can go fuck yourself, but if you're saying women shouldn't be able to vote b…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:50 PM
11

All Russian and Ukrainian men have military training where virtually none of the women do.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:28 PM
3

/r/mensrants
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:24 PM
1

Explain.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:07 PM
2

Which posts are you referring to, her posts containing child porn or her posts admitting to it?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:51 AM
2

Not unless the admins un-delete her posts.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:42 AM
4

We know that /r/creepshots was taken down because of definitively underage content and we know that /u/HarrietPotter openly and proudly admits to posting it. What more do you want? She's also holdiong /r/askmras hostage on unacceptable terms.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:32 AM
5

/u/HarrietPotter is a troll. She openly admits to posting child porn to have subreddits such as /r/creepshots taken down and has locked /r/askmras simply to troll some more.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:29 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:50 PM
2

Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:10 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:09 PM
0

Gender swap: What would have happened?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:59 PM
1

I don't care.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:51 PM
-1

Fuck these people.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:50 PM
1

I think that that's too deep for most Feminists to understand.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:01 PM
9

Patriarchy, as planned.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:09 AM
2

The downside is that we have trolls with karma in here. It might not sound great but maybe discounting the posts from people who frequent the less than sane Feminist subreddits?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:06 AM
1

Because there is no reason for it to be on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:04 AM
8

Well we don't pander to demographics, if that's what you mean.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:01 AM
2

Present them with new information which is easily understood and verified, and treat them like people.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:58 AM
2

We tend to agree on how things are, but not anything else, which is still vastly more than we agree with Feminists on.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:29 AM
1

Devils Advocate: The doctor might feel pretty shitty if your wife wanted kids and you had it done in secret.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:21 AM
0

What if she got her ears pierced without your permission?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:18 AM
0

Nope. You can't apply the same thing to oranges as you can to apples.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:13 AM
8

It won't, that would take bravery and morality.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:05 AM
-1

Apples to oranges.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:04 AM
2

Since it doesn't just mean 'to hate women' any more - basically "sexism against women". No, just no.... "Dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women." - Websters Is the loosest correct definition I'm able to find, use the word correctly or not at all. And the word you're looking for is just 'sexism'. So that's from trying to control women's choices, to flat out saying you dislike the entire sex/gender. This is unintelligible.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:58 PM
0

What personalized definition of 'misogyny' are you using?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:41 PM
14

Not to mention it relies on government support...not that our government will stop it, but my point is that it isn't a self sufficient ideology.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:39 PM
-3

So it's ok to shame women who choose not to shave? Yes. A woman (like a man) can have as much or as little sex as she or he wants. This is plainly untrue.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:29 PM
0

I skimmed through that list and I for one don't see it as misogynistic, nobody should be praised for being a slutty leech.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:18 PM
3

Which is why most of them have been trolls.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:16 PM
2

I'd get rid of the deliberate vagueness of laws.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:15 PM
3

Well, she's not wrong...
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:13 PM
0

No. Men with high numbers have other attractive traits like money and power.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:13 PM
0

Do they lose anything from renting those to men as well? Those obviously refers to the "female-only rooms" What?... It's not about making a men's only floor, it's about not making a women's only floor. Keep it for both genders [...] Can it get more explicit than that? Yes, you could have posted exactly that in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:12 PM
1

How is it inefficiently allocating resources. Men won't pay extra or be more interested in a male-only floor. You were implying that they should have both a male only floor and a female only floor.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:07 PM
-2

That's not "problem solved", you'd just waste money through inefficient allocation of resources.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:56 PM
4

I don't disagree that it's sexist, but it's stupid to expect them to make a men's only floor for the 3 people who care enough to complain. Meanwhile there are plenty of sexist women who want their own floor. And yes they might loose business if they made a men only floor without sufficient demand.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:51 PM
2

Sure it is. Self control is an attractive trait when looking for a longterm partner, women who don't have it will be passed over. Explain what's wrong with that.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:43 PM
3

I'd try to haggle :/ And if there isn't a demand by men for mens only rooms, why would they have them?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:26 PM
0

What's implied by a woman having lots of sex? Only that she lacks self control and wouldn't make a very good mate. What's implied by a man having lots of sex? That he has other traits useful for attracting women., which in turn attracts more women. Most women have access to more men than they could possibly hope to utilize, men however need to work to get women, that's what makes it impressive. Women being dangerous doesn't make them less attractive, and why would it?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:23 PM
2

Because it's genuinely not the same thing. The implications are completely different.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:53 PM
0

No thanks, I'd rather direct them here.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:25 PM
2

That doesn't contradict with my statement.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:05 PM
6

That's the wrong way of viewing it.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:53 PM
0

The opposite sex.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:53 PM
-1

Do you even understand the metaphor? Simple fact is that sluts are less attractive than studs, why? I don't care, but the reason is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:15 PM
9

This was very obviously staged and I guarantee that he gave consent well in advance.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:10 PM
12

Called it.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:58 AM
4

That reminds me of how they treat rape victims. I think GWW said something along these lines but can you imagine how shitty it must feel to be told that you can have no impact on it happening again, ever?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:58 AM
1

You mean the Stalin part?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:56 AM
3

Ironically enough I was trashing Feminism because of how I've seen Feminists behave and then my mother suggested that I do some research first, then I came across GirlWritesWhat and Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:43 AM
5

I'd suggest that your girlfriend finds a new doctor and that neither of you recommend your current one to anybody.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:39 PM
23

And anyone else who doesn't want their DNA on record and as a suspect of rape.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:37 PM
17

"Both" would have also been a suitable answer.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:37 PM
0

9.5/10
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:35 PM
1

Don't come to BC.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:58 AM
2

Stallion or mare?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:55 AM
3

Hopefully she will grow up.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:48 AM
0

The worst thing that can happen is that trolls lie about it, which they will do anyways.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:38 AM
0

I suggestively mock them.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:33 PM
1

Would you mind giving out the information for others to dig through?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:31 PM
-1

This is meant to be schooling, not the NFL.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:27 PM
-3

Especially when many people are like me and will simply dismiss anyone who claims to be of some fictional sexuality.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:12 PM
-4

Fair enough on your first point, whichever sex they are capable of emulating, we're specifically talking about sexuality and not general attraction.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:07 PM
1

Husbands and wives have always been extensions of one another, and that hasn't changes in the higher levels of society.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:53 PM
-6

Are you attracted to the opposite sex but not your own? Straight. Are you attracted to your own sex but not the opposite? Gay. Are you attracted to both sexes? Bisexual. That covers every possible angle.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:51 PM
0

That accurately reflects reality. /s
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:50 PM
2

In the US it is a title though.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:05 PM
-1

I think that Bill Clinton might become the de facto President, which would be pretty cool. Aside from that I can't see a married woman becoming President.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:05 PM
-2

There are like 3 legitimate sexualities...
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:03 PM
1

I disagree on that last part. Not that I think these false numbers should be promoted as the truth but I think that when someone asks "Really? Men are sexually assaulted as much as women?" it opens up a new level for dialogue.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:02 PM
3

It still happens...
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:00 PM
1

Fuck...wrong link.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:22 PM
1

Proving my point.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:02 PM
1

Lets go with affirmative action and child custody.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:02 PM
1

I'd argue that a fair few of those 15% are false, especially considering how many of them are from plea bargains.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:02 PM
1

I think that one might actually be true...
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:00 PM
1

BAM!
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:59 PM
8

Against: It's not your penis. For: Irrelevant after the former argument.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:57 PM
4

Not even that, they're just saying that some women are kept awake from snoring.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:53 PM
2

Post the numbers for the other 49 states and then the total.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:51 PM
1

Not if the man doesn't explicitly request it, and even then there's only a chance. But assuming that the man wants the child and the woman doesn't and they have a combined IQ of above 100 then the man raising the child without complications is fully possible.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:45 PM
2

It doesn't, but that doesn't make it any less valid to the masses.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:44 AM
1

Meh, there's always going to be at least one person who says yes and mumbled "Fuck the system." to themselves.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:43 AM
5

Children have always acted this way, in one way or another.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:42 AM
1

You should give him the complementary red horse suppository.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:53 AM
2

50/50 Saying you hate fags/niggers/cis scum isn't a problem but when they start to encourage hate and action, that's a problem.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:51 AM
6

Women do have that option :/
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:49 AM
7

But the vast majority of them are, and if you compare the bangable ratio between the sexes there are vastly more women than men so the standards thing is pretty irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:47 AM
1

True, but I don't that that those are the prostitutes in question.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:47 AM
11

I think it's simpler than that. This 5th grader is getting attention for screaming something, that's all the motivation she will ever need.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:39 AM
0

But an excess of 99% do.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:38 AM
2

Detroit.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:34 AM
1

Such as double standards?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:46 PM
2

Pretending to be a rich 'alpha' douchebag is a good one.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:44 PM
10

It is troubling to see that the accused woman plead guilty (so she almost certainly did the things she's accused of doing) Most rape convictions are through plea bargains...
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:05 PM
-2

No.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:02 PM
2

Definitely.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:59 PM
2

We tend to agree on whats wrong and how it's wrong though, which is more than I can say about Feminists.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:58 PM
2

We also want to fix things like social double standards, they want to abuse them to get laid. My main point is that we both tend to agree on what's wrong and how it's wrong, which is more then I can say about us and Feminists.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:55 PM
2

I didn't say that we should tolerate it, but it is tolerated.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:54 PM
2

Just setup your phone on something, like prop it up with a paperclip and it will do fine.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:41 AM
32

In theory? Yes. In practice? No.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:40 AM
23

daughter Civil revolt.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:40 AM
7

TRP is more like: "Fuck yeah, patriarchy!" (LOL, time to take advantage of stupid women)
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:38 AM
4

Devils Advocate: TRP is pretty damned similar to the MRM, it's just that while we want to fix something broken they want to abuse it, but we both tend to agree on whatever is broken and how.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:37 AM
13

Actually it does.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:36 AM
2

You mean the lid...
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:26 PM
1

Evidently, as did everyone else ever.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:16 PM
3

30,000,000 was just the USSR.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:15 PM
0

Devils Advocate: Young men do seem to be vastly shittier renters compared to young women.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:14 PM
0

It won't happen. Either Feminists control it and they will censor you or they won't show up.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:09 PM
3

Ukraine has active conscription, the men are trained, the women are not. If conscription ended 20+ years ago then you'd have a point but as it stands now it's just practicality.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:05 PM
0

Yes you were.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:03 PM
3

Keep us posted.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:01 PM
3

This title is a bit misleading.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:58 PM
7

I'm pretty sure the number for WWII casualties was closer to 59-65 million, when you count all of the deaths.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:57 PM
1

Mostly to the rest of the world...
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:43 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:42 PM
1

Being skinny has nothing to do with being fit or healthy.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:28 PM
1

No. The US may be the single largest market but it isn't the market.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:27 PM
3

Topless and from a rear angle...not naked.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:24 PM
1

Nothing new then.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:20 PM
2

Legally the guy may as well have Captain Americas shield but the accusation alone could massively fuck him up, I also wouldn't bet on her being charges let alone convicted of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:20 AM
2

I disagree. Also, radical and mainstream are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:17 AM
-1

Up until that point they are the same.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:02 PM
1

I still find the contrast between groups to be interesting. TRP and MRM are almost identical except where TRP wants to abuse a flawed system the MRM wants to fix it. Similarly Feminists are split between those who bullshit and those who don't.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:56 PM
2

It's a reference to The Matrix in which Neo is presented with 2 pills, taking the blue pill changes nothing and Neo would remain a part of The Matrix, taking the red pill frees him from The Matrix but also exposes him to the horrors of the real world. They apply that philosophy to the real world by accepting the shittyness of unfair gender dynamics and taking advantage of them rather than changing anything.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:46 PM
2

Would someone please give me a TL;DR?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:09 PM
5

I think you mean 'close minded' rather than sexist.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:04 PM
8

First I was like >:( Then I was like :'/
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:03 PM
6

I think it's acceptable in this instance.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:03 PM
1

I'd rather have neither. (considering context of the former)
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:03 PM
3

I think it is.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:35 PM
1

Does it effect you? > yes? > Yes.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:15 PM
-2

Just for contrast you should observe the moderates, radicals and offshoots of each group. For example the moderate Feminist subreddit is /r/Feminisms and /r/feminism is their 'radical' subreddit with /r/shitredditsays arguably being their offshoot. We don't have a radical sub-faction as of yet, we have /r/mensrights as out 'moderates' and arguably /r/theredpill is related enough to be an offshoot.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:14 PM
2

I disagree. Anyone can get into STEM fields if they wanted to, women simply choose not to. Also, these shithead policy makers are pretty fucking determined to make women "stick" at severe costs.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:10 PM
0

I didn't say conscription, I said signing up for military service, kinda like Selective Service in the US but less formal. I'll get around to it, but honestly I'm pretty lazy. Try Googling a documentary on voting rights or something.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:07 PM
2

But there isn't a demand for women in those fields.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:47 PM
1

There isn't any demand...
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:11 PM
1

Why?...
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:19 PM
20

I've observed differently, as have most people.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:18 PM
0

In 1910 anyone who signed up for military service could vote, the only difference is that men didn't have a choice.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:12 PM
3

Don't bother trying to change their minds, the best you can hope for it to make them look like idiots publicly and influence third parties.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 11:40 PM
2

As they have since before they were born.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:06 PM
2

The 1/4 statistic also lumps getting cat called with rape.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:09 PM
4

That latter part requires a certain level of understanding which many people lack.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:05 PM
39

That's not intolerance, it's stupidity/bad humor.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:36 PM
2

I'm Canadian, and I have literally no idea. I know that in 1920 women got the right to vote with no requirements and that conscription ended in 1948 so at that point men got de facto equal rights.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:25 PM
2

Looks like the Feminists are vote brigading again :/
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:59 PM
2

Worth noting that women got the vote in the UK at the exact same time men did, 1910, all they had to do was sign up for the military like men did. It was a vastly better deal for women even then as they had the option of not joining/voting and even if they did they would never be put in combat. (alt
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:58 PM
2

Same thing.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:55 PM
1

In this case they overlap.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:54 PM
1

The real reason is that the continuation of a country is considered more important than individual rights and/or that if you want to vote in said nation then you are obliged to protect it. And I do think that it is a valid example, selective service is bad but the only way I can see it getting done away with is if women are included in it. Which is worse, current selective service lasting indefinitely or selective service with twice the people but only for a year or two before being abolished?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:23 PM
1

Not always, women being forced into Selective Service is a good example of such.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:19 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:06 PM
1

I'll have to read the book because it sounds very different from the movie, which is pretty damned typical. You seem to be implying that voting rights are actual rights rather than privileges and that men have them taken away by default, that's wrong. Voting rights aren't rights but rather privileges, you earn them through whatever stupid means be it military service or being a woman.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:04 PM
2

Watch it again or Youtube the shower scene, they make it pretty clear that military service is necessary (although not explicitly necessary) to have babies and other stuff.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:59 PM
-2

I'm referencing the movie, not the book.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:45 PM
-1

Possibly.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:43 PM
-5

You're wrong. PS: You seem to have a weirdly reversed view of how voting rights work.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:27 PM
0

The context was a dystopian future where people had to do suicidal military service to be allowed to reproduce or get a job.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:07 PM
0

What?...
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:46 PM
6

Taking that into consideration this guy should be sitting on 20+ million. (I'm not saying this would be reasonable but rather equally unreasonable)
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:32 PM
-4

I genuinely hate that argument...did you even pay attention to the context of the Starship Troopers locker scene?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:22 PM
-1

The fact remains that a male officer would have done it better, or at least been made fun of for failing that badly.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:38 AM
9

But nobody would care so nobody would care.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:33 AM
2

Even then, the men are more likely to tip.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 11:41 PM
2

You were perfectly in line.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 11:40 PM
25

They know what they fucking did.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:34 PM
4

Bonus: They can't use that on us anywhere near as effectively.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:26 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:08 AM
1

I love how Oman is somehow unknown.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:12 AM
7

Innocent until proven guilty needs to be applied universally.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:11 AM
0

Do we have some context? While I agree that that is low-level sexual harassment I am supportive of peoples right to be rude and obnoxious.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 10:16 PM
1

Just make sure to youtube all of it.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 10:13 PM
8

No, and even if we could it wouldn't be a good idea. That would be like trying to remove a tumor wit a hammer.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 10:11 PM
0

of equal attractiveness
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:35 PM
28

Educate everyone else, that would certainly help.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:33 PM
-2

/r/mensrants away.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:46 PM
-2

Devils Advocate: Feminists will describe paying for a date as force, since you're putting someone under some kind of something something social patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:45 PM
21

A true example of female privilege.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:49 PM
4

That's just how I argue with them, I trap them in their own logic and then use it against them. That way they can only ever appear insane or hypocritical.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:18 PM
9

Depends on the context, but I suppose you could say that Mens Rights isn't about men and try getting them to refute it, then use the same means against them.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:57 PM
-3

There are no girls on the internet.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:38 PM
-3

Here's something to know, we either don't care or get annoyed when people identify by gender.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:25 PM
0

Truer words have never been said.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:29 AM
0

The US has built and operates 10 nuclear powered 100,000tonne supercarriers, they can damned well double the number of security guards feeling up peoples junk at airports.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 10:26 AM
1

I'm pretty sure it reads the other way, unless you mean that the police gave a warning.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:20 PM
5

to women ages 14-36. I'm not saying it's right that this dribble is effective but it quite obviously is, and the cretins in marketing could probably give a shit less about anything other than money profit margins.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:14 PM
1

Maybe healthier people are just more likely to give warnings? Who knows, but this is an interesting mystery.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:12 PM
4

I'm sure that's a part of it, but I mean in the simple sense that their applications aren't even looked at let alone responded to.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:18 PM
5

So...they left them empty rather than allow men in?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:17 PM
0

Airport check in terminals.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:16 PM
5

What problem?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:14 PM
16

From what I've heard there's actually a massive bias against men in teaching and childcare.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:14 PM
3

13: One to make a government funded "Survivors of the Dark" help group.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:49 PM
5

Nah, 4chan is like the Saturday Night Live of the internet, they're basically for the 'lulz' but due to their politically incorrect disposition they can get away with saying a lot of things that other groups can't get away with saying.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:48 PM
2

Affirmative Action maybe?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:30 PM
0

I was under the assumption that doctors would be the majority in hospitals :/
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:28 PM
1

Feminists?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:57 PM
0

Yes, this one is pretty well confirmed. (the less sex thing anyways, the less pregnancies part just seems like a logical result)
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:57 PM
8

What a worthless person.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:31 PM
-1

Who cares?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:28 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:29 PM
1

I haven't been to that subreddit in a good while, did SRS kill it like they have recently killed /r/facebookcleavage?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:54 PM
0

POW! Right in the kisser!
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:34 PM
-6

Dark-O-Meter: Bout to get real. It also reduces the amount of sex they're going to be having, meaning less spreading of diseases and less pregnancies.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:27 PM
12

I don't think that the boys and men of rural Africa have much access to information regarding circumcision.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:26 PM
1

"If it exists, there's porn of it."
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:22 PM
2

That's dangerously close to how Feminists think/feel.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:33 AM
1

Rule34 dictates that it has already been done.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:32 AM
1

This is what I get for using Google... a well deserved fate.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:37 AM
0

Children who are attracted to adults.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:34 AM
1

I thought it was the other way? (kinda) where women tended to choose either something easy or something that they liked while men tended to choose things which were useful.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:24 AM
-1

Do we have a status report on her rug?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:46 PM
2

Result? They now charge men more to subsidize the now larger proportion of women, and so the cycle continues.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:45 PM
1

You can't, they will continue to choose to believe whatever they want to believe irregardless of anything and everything they are presented with.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:42 PM
1

Nope, that's abandonment plain and simple.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:37 PM
0

My opinion: A man should have equal rights to the fetus, unfortunately for the time being that doesn't mean much as it is integrated with a woman's body but in this hypothetical I say yes, the man should have the right to have the fetus transplanted or whatever and if the woman kills it then that should be treated as infanticide.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:36 PM
4

Look up the chances of female to male infection of HIV and look at those numbers, unless she's getting doublestuffed 80 times a day then they don't add up.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:33 PM
5

I think a simple public apology of their fuckup, backpay and getting his job back would be enough.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:30 PM
4

No, just no.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:29 PM
4

Assuming those numbers are correct, what percentage of the disparity do you think is the result of expulsion for bullshit reasons?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:27 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:25 PM
1

And some like me want to add women to the draft to remove the draft.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:13 PM
1

Definitely.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:50 AM
7

Devils Advocate: It's provocative and will garner attention.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:28 PM
3

No idea, but considering how cheap contraceptives are to produce I wouldn't doubt it.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:25 PM
0

I think you may have....
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:19 PM
2

Nope, they cost more all the way. Probably.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:17 PM
0

Random guess? Current education levels.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:07 PM
1

It might be relative.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:00 PM
7

I always went with 'strut around like they won', but yes.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:55 AM
3

50/50 on that one, men ~16-25 do cost VASTLY more than other demographics but women start costing more at ~25.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:38 AM
12

How did that end?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:36 AM
10

I disagree. They simply don't care about the 'why' or the 'how'.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:35 AM
12

Or playing chess with a pigeon.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:33 AM
2

Or "I reported this page, FaceBook decided to leave it up for 6 months."
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:00 PM
37

"Irish need not apply."
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:57 AM
18

True, but it has garnered attention and exposed bias.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:57 AM
1

I wasn't suggesting anything, I was simply pointing out that terrorism is a more effective means of fear mongering than imprisonment.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:23 PM
0

That's exactly how they get this kind of thing, same with the 1-4 women are raped statistic.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:54 PM
1

Most of the US and Canada.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:23 PM
0

I never said it was legal, but if your goal is fear mongering than that's the way to go.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:48 PM
1

What about the teenager who smokes weed?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:20 PM
1

Flogging.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:19 PM
12

Meh, it will be watched by middle aged women who also watch Sex in the City and Bones.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 10:25 PM
1

They are shameless and would grab like all of your muffins.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:48 PM
1

What the other guy said and the 'means' are already being applied, it's not like I'm suggesting we push a woman off a building to get railings put up so much as I'm suggesting that a woman be put up with the men and allowed to fall off.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:28 PM
3

Probably, but that blank confused look on their faces would probably make me laugh even harder, and you might just get lucky and have someone ask the honest question of "Why are you laughing at us?" and then listen to your answer.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:23 PM
5

Logic also isn't simple, it's more logical to take a beating than go to prison.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:46 AM
16

Learn to laugh out loud and make them feel stupid.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:45 AM
1

Not quite.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:11 AM
2

I would heavily suggest that you learn to write properly as it is an extremely valuable skill. My advice would be for you to re-write your comment a few times and simply refine what you already have, capitalize and remove words as necessary.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 06:20 PM
1

Really? Because it looks like one big wall of unstructured text to me. Calm down and re-write it so that I can appropriately respond. PS: Nitpicking at specific things like a misspelling is what people often do as a last resort, however I'm unable to comprehensively read your comment because the entirely of it is so poorly written.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:53 PM
8

I think that the best way to remove these laws is to apply them to women.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:48 PM
2

The idea isn't to educate the Zealot in question but to expose her bigotry and general stupidity to 3rd parties.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:44 PM
1

I...I could actually see that poster being reasonably effective in malls and such.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:43 PM
2

He is The One.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:42 PM
1

Not really...
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:39 PM
1

Unlikely.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:38 PM
5

Odds are it's just an advertisement and nothing more.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:36 PM
1

Male humans are the humans in question.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:35 PM
5

I agree with you, but I don't think that will work. Society won't give a shit about this issue until a woman is sentences to 25 years without parole for having sex with a 17 year old. Necessary evil?
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:29 PM
1

Either one works the same really.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:28 PM
1

I genuinely cannot read what you attempted to write because it was written so badly, if you feel like re-writing it then I'll gladly respond. Until then, bye. (Pro tip, paragraphs.)
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:20 PM
1

Naturally weak men aren't accepted into the military so that's a non issue and when the average fit 180lb male is faster and stronger than the fastest and strongest women to have ever lived it's fair to call women weak in this context. Your friend being successful doesn't mean jack shit, the biggest problems with women in the military is their effect on people around them, when you put a woman in a unit casualties increase ~3x and moral drops all around them like Death itself is walking around c…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:04 PM
0

You implied that they didn't...and seeing as they didn't have to it's unlikely that they did. Basically, pic's or it didn't happen. This isn't Hollywood and being small doesn't make you invisible or give you superspeed, the fact stands that with equal training a man is going to beat a woman roughly 9 out of 9 times. History has shown very clearly that women are bad news for the military, every modern military which integrates women has shown this clearly. They may be able to scrape along the bot…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:46 AM
1

Yes they do it quite often, in arguably evil ways. That's only 1% of being a soldier, and like it or not the person with larger muscles, denser bones, higher red bloodcell count and larger lungs is going to have an advantage. There is no 'equivalent weight' in the real world, you can either lift the ~200lb person or you can't.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:34 AM
1

There are a dozen reasons not to put them on the front lines, but that won't stop politicians from having it done. I could kill like a dozen people in their sleep without breaking a sweat.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:10 AM
2

None.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:51 PM
8

Looks like either OP or a mod deleted their posts to save face.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:47 PM
1

1-6 are fine in my books as I define a "real man/woman" simply as a good person.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:49 PM
1

Worth noting that men used to score significantly higher on IQ tests but then the tests were remade to balance out with the assumption that men and women are equally intelligent (and that IQ tests mean anything) and that an equal score would show that the test was accurate.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:45 PM
1

They don't, but Israel is a unique situation.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:52 PM
0

Sadly, no.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:09 AM
1

Israel has shown what I'm saying to be correct for ~50 years. They have had the same shitty experience of using women as soldiers as everyone else, it's just that their low population means necessitates their use.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:27 PM
1

History has shown that women are typically less than worthless as soldiers in any role other than cannonfodder, see Russia and Israel for examples under different circumstances.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:20 PM
2

What do I make of this? Trolls/Feminists like you are scraping the bottom of the barrel.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:29 PM
2

Put a little faith in your justice system when it comes to this. As a man, how about no.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:29 PM
1

It's actually extremely hard to treat, partially due to lazy doctors.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:46 PM
2

Norwegian gender paradox.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:43 PM
1

Women can do most of the jobs which men do, but there are a few which they simply can't do (policemen, firemen, soldiers, etc) and the jobs which they can do they typically don't do as well.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:41 PM
-2

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:13 AM
-2

More than you.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:02 AM
-2

Tagged as Troll/moron, goodbye. Edit: I simplified my original comment so you might be able to understand it.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:44 AM
2

Well sure sending out cheques to people is easier but you would probably see a much smaller return. Give out cards which allow people to buy specific food items, healthy-ish foods which preferably don't spoil. You'd probably need a plan to stop stupid people from wasting to much food. Then Bill Gates can opt out. Says who? If you give a stupid person 20k to blow on crack then they will blow it on crack, then they will steal food and rob people for rent.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:40 AM
0

2 This is standard protocol, it's simply easier to kick men out. Where a man is more likely to throw a punch at a bouncer and start a fight a woman is more likely to scream false accusations, throw drinks; possibly at bystanders, do weird shit like throw used tampons, a bouncer being punched is harmless to a company, false accusations and injured customers/products are costly.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:14 AM
1

I agree, but I still think it's a a risky move.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:16 PM
2

I'm pretty sure we've had permanent hair removal for a while now.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:14 PM
1

True, and that's why I prefer the idea of providing housing and food to anyone and everyone regardless of whatever. They would still be poor and stupid but they would have good and easy options. (plus it would be cheaper)
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:04 PM
2

That would be a shitty system, a much cheaper one with less flaws would be to provide housing and food for everyone free of charge, it would cost vastly less and means that they couldn't spend 20,000$ a year on weed and then beg for more money afterwards.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:02 PM
3

She should be getting 0% though, anything more is truly criminal.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:58 PM
1

That's a slippery slope.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:55 PM
4

In British Columbia it's either 6 months of cohabitation or living in a "marriage like relationship".
/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:50 PM
4

1500$ would cover that and then some more, lots more.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:47 PM
2

I'd seriously consider doing something like this but taking all factors into account and having the information on hand.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 11:23 AM
6

No.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 11:15 AM
1

Hopefully not.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 11:15 AM
1

If they don't suck then it doesn't matter what some moronic 'gurl gamer' does or says.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:37 AM
1

Male on female rape is along the same lines, the only thing stopping women from raping men in the exact same way is biological inability. (I'm speaking loosely)
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:32 AM
1

Same here, but we only have like 12%, and half of them are politican tokens.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:23 AM
-5

So is rape.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:46 PM
1

I'd just walk up and take a few of them, if they bitch then I point out how what they're doing is illegal.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:45 PM
6

They benefit from them, simple as that.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:42 PM
6

In France paternity tests are illegal...
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:42 PM
1

Common sense tells me that there must be some kind of external force to make this happen, and yes affirmative action was my first guess. Can you think of any other reason why that would happen?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:49 PM
-2

Just like harbor seals.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:28 PM
1

You could have brought up shooting, which is at least closer to a physical sport than chess.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:25 PM
0

Go look up any event at the Olympics, ever.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:25 PM
1

I've encountered exactly 1 female gamer in World of Tanks: Xbox 360 edition so far, it's been out for a few weeks and I've just now gotten a medal for 1000 kills. 1 female gamer vs >500 male gamers.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:23 PM
1

All of the studies I've seen simply count up the total game purchases, that means that the herd of teenage girls who downloaded Angry Birds count as gamers while I who downloaded World of Tanks probably don't.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:19 PM
2

Yes on the former, no on the latter.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:15 PM
1

I disagree, it's the difference between being a good or bad at something, simple as that.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:15 PM
0

Actually...a lot of games give special treatment to female characters, online and offline.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:12 PM
1

Sweet, I'll compare them to what I get in GTA:V.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:09 PM
3

4chan, politically and socially incorrect enough to say what needs to be said.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:07 PM
3

Are you kidding? I for one use female characters whenever possible because the treatment I get is so vastly superior.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:02 PM
-1

Because it makes us feel good, kinda like feeding fish to seals.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:00 PM
1

I'm curious about the 50/50 thing, how did that happen?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:55 PM
3

Apex fallacy, until they see a female president with an all female staff and an all female congress and senate they won't accept that women have any power whatsoever.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:54 PM
3

The real problem in my opinion is that a lot of them don't realize that it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:52 PM
1

Here's a hypothetical for you: I'm a woman and I raped you, now watcha gonna do bitch?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:52 PM
0

I don't think that word means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:39 PM
3

Devils Advocate: Not getting enough can suck, getting to much can suck vastly more.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:00 PM
0

I could care less.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:59 PM
0

Why not?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:57 PM
0

Same with comedy actually, they can say the truth and mask it as satire. Saturday Night Live anyone?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:34 PM
0

Unlike FaceBook. /s
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:34 PM
0

It's a satire sub, similar to /r/murica.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:18 PM
-10

I disagree. FaceBook is retarded, 4chan is less retarded and funny.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:14 PM
1

Maybe so, meh.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:15 PM
9

It's infinitely more true for women than men, which I suspect is what he meant.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:30 PM
0

General female stupidity. More specifically the universal "pussy pass" in our society which allows women to get away with being only slightly more than animals.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:28 PM
9

Labourers can typically be turned down for not meeting standards.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:25 PM
4

What?...
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:36 AM
1

50/50 Male names tend to get marginally more responses in some fields, but in other fields men don't even get responded to or possibly reported to the police to which there is no female equivalent.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:47 AM
1

That's arguably the least important factor.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:44 AM
18

Neither, shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights12/02/14 09:34 PM
3

I'd imagine wars stopping instantly if we did.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:13 PM
9

With regards to the former, you're either a Feminist who wants to maintain that status quo or an egalitarian who seeks to remedy it. You can't do both.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:24 PM
9

I think the odds of researchers not accounting for absolutely 100% of potential factors is more likely than discrimination for discrimination sake.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:22 PM
5

It's more like worrying about prostate cancer, I don't have it but saying "Meh, not an issue." is a stupid idea.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:20 PM
6

But apparently the majority of women do.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:18 PM
2

What's with the redundant H in MHRA?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:18 PM
2

Wouldn't requiring the voters (~65% female) to sign up be more effective?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:11 PM
2

Men are conscripted daily in many nations including Russia and Norway while as far as I am aware the only country which conscripts women is Israel where women aren't required to perform all of the same duties or for as long.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:07 PM
4

"earning gap", there is no observable wage gap in men's favour.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:05 PM
4

They are mutually exclusive concepts.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:04 PM
3

To be fair, /r/atheism is pretty shitty for other reasons.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:04 PM
7

Worth noting though that you're not banned in here and you in all likelihood won't be, but if you parodied this in /r/Feminism then you would have been banned instantly.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:03 PM
6

Because the vast majority of those posts are complete crap which go along the lines of "Feminism helps men too, at least that's how I as a woman see things." and just annoy people without really saying anything constructive.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:59 PM
2

Off topic. You can either respond to my post or be ignored.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:58 PM
2

False. Women serve in a good deal of countries but without exception (that I'm aware of) they are a net detriment, intentionally or otherwise. There are very few circumstances where it's even arguably a good idea. (Israel) Strength is certainly an important factor but still relatively low on the list.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:21 PM
53

I REALLY want to see the general scores for that test. I'd literally pay for it.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:18 PM
14

You're begging the question with your presumption that supporting mens rights is mutually inclusive with believing that women don't face discrimination. I fully accept that women face discrimination, I also think that the vast majority of it is either benevolent in nature/intent, self caused, not actually discrimination, justified (on some level) or just flat out unimportant by comparison to the discrimination that men face. (so summarize, I care 100x more about the man who can't become a teache…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:16 PM
2

And?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:59 PM
2

Swedish youth really are fucking horrible though, same with Australia. Specifically the girls.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:20 AM
1

I believe that Norway actually holds things like college diplomas for men who have to serve in the military.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:18 AM
2

Devils Advocate: Conscription is meant as a defence, to make sure that your country has a relatively military reserve. Women wouldn't be useful in this, men are.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:17 AM
1

Fuck that, give them the transcripts in shorthand.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:14 AM
1

Hence the all mighty /s tag.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 10:00 AM
2

Get a camera and a lawyer, probably in that order.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 10:59 AM
1

No?
/r/MensRights09/02/14 10:42 AM
2

Depends what kind of house and to what standard. My grandmother still spends a couple hours a day keeping their big house from the 50's spotless.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:56 PM
1

Ironically enough they ban people from there just as much.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:26 AM
1

Semantics, the point is that they needed to make a new rule to keep any dissent squashed.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:26 AM
2

Was this comment meant to be satire?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:24 AM
2

Maybe men eat healthier and as such walk up stairs faster when elevators go out of service and as such earn slightly more. The point is that you would need to take this into consideration along with absolutely every other possible and impossible factor to say that the resulting disparity is due to sexism.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:22 AM
3

Feminism = anti-equality.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:15 AM
4

Jealousy.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:12 AM
1

Admittedly that statue is slightly creepy, but hardly in the rapey way...more in the check outside before you go to sleep to make sure it's still there kind of way.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:10 AM
1

Being physically stronger, not having a period, etc etc of biological differences.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:08 PM
0

They should donate 53-56% of their profits to women then.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:02 PM
1

And good teaching. You can easily teach yourself how to read and all things regarding language, math generally requires some level of instruction to pick up properly.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:24 PM
1

It's in our way.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:30 PM
1

At this point I think the sheer publicity of it would be a good thing, good or bad it's still good.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:17 PM
0

Behold the power of forced paraphrasing. I can understand that the benefits harms of not breastfeeding are there and that the act not should be encouraged, but making it a law is pretty stupid.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:16 PM
1

Irony is the Russians drink less than the French, Germans, English or really most heavily drinking people. They just drink a lot at a time. "There's no such thing as a half a bottle of Vodka in Russia."
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:15 PM
1

Document what she stole, lock all of the bank services that you can.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:11 PM
1

Obama: "We're paying women well above the national average, and that's a positive change in the right direction."
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:09 PM
-1

Devils Advocate: He's already known the world around as the dumbest person on TV, so I don't think being called a misogynist would phase him, if he even knows what the word means.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:08 PM
2

Red meat is perfectly healthy, unlike Vodka.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:06 PM
1

Am I the only one who thought "Please be in the south..." for that first clip where the black boy is leading a white girl? The irony would be awesomely funny to me. And yeah, leashing your child is kinda disgusting. But this has nothing to do with mens rights unless you inherently link it to women's incompetence. This was on the side though, anyone have an opinion on it?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:57 PM
1

Not past midnight.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:54 PM
1

It's noisy.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 02:50 AM
1

People who live in rentals where the fan turns on when the light turns on.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:52 AM
1

Fine, but put the lid down in public washrooms.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:51 AM
1

Pissing on your hands and not washing them isn't a significant health risk, but it's still gross.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:50 AM
5

Imagine a woman being in a man's position there...comes home with what she thinks is the wrong baby, hospital says tough shit.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:19 PM
4

The mothers vote is what they care about.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:18 PM
3

Costs would be minimal if it was standard practice.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:17 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:16 PM
4

She can afford to be that because of her position.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:13 PM
1

Probably, yes.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:12 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:12 PM
6

Sorry, couldn't resist it. That's the problem, shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:09 PM
4

And hard drives are cheap as shit so you could easily record like a years worth of HD for less than $100...I'd definitely back that up.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:08 PM
2

A lot, especially if I drop a bag of sugar in front of them.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:06 PM
3

Nobody cares, that's funny.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:06 PM
2

That means that the Yahoo community will migrate...so I'd rather keep it up.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:57 PM
3

There were actually some amazing people on Yahoo Answers, especially in the gender & women's studies subsection. They got banned though...except for this one guy who seemed to be immune, which was weird.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:56 PM
7

My time to shine. As a 24 times banned veteran of Yahoo Answers I can tell you that that's perfectly normal for the gender & women's studies subsection and that "Yahoo" didn't get rid of your answer, the Feminist Reportski's did. Yahoo has a different moderating system to Reddit and most other websites. On here if you are reported 3 times then a moderator is alerted and they can take action, if you want to appeal then you just message a moderator. On Yahoo Answers it's all automated, if somethin…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:56 PM
6

Now I'm just curious...how in the hell did they make it so he isn't allowed to drink? I'm not aware of any laws making that possible.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:38 PM
1

You explained your own interpretation of their incoherent opinions, and I accept it as a component of my own interpretation. And would you cut it out with the blatant logical fallacies? I don't want to start throwing them in your face to make you stop.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:17 PM
1

My turn. Alex is raped, Morgan tries to help by offering basic safety advice, Taylor stops Morgan from helping and then informs Alex that rapists just shouldn't rape. This behaviour leads to Alex being less informed and therefor less safe. Taylor has put Alex in greater risk of being raped again, consciously or otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:09 PM
1

And you're stupidity has gone full circle, good job.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:58 PM
1

Yes it is extremely ironic, you claim that we are married to misinformation and have no working knowledge of the phrases "rape culture" and "victim blaming" but then come around and say Right, people here believe that they are saying the average person litrally thinks rape is ok. The other thing is that people here tend to believe that the victim blaming movement, is an argument against personal safety. Which is both misinformation and shows that you have no working knowledge of how we use those…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:36 PM
2

Worth noting that after like 22 it switches around forever and women become more dangerous drivers. (until like 84, then I think it switches again)
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:36 PM
10

This illustrates a bigger problem, the illegal route is becoming less legally risky than the legal route. How long until you get less time for murdering your wife than divorcing her?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:34 PM
1

The irony here is astounding.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:03 PM
1

No, people here often believe that that's what Feminists often believe, because they say so. It typically is.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:39 PM
2

I've never seen that definition used in here. The definition I have seen used it that rape is simply tolerated and seen as "okay" by society as a whole, which could extent to the definition you made up.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:30 PM
2

I disagree. We use those phrases as accurately as is possible with definitions constructed from their observable use.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:12 PM
1

I thought it was children > women > old people > valuable animals > men?
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:02 PM
1

We definitely mob, but I haven't seen much for intellectual dishonesty :/
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:54 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:42 PM
5

Kinky...
/r/MensRights26/01/14 01:23 PM
-1

Tell that to /r/blackfathers.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:25 PM
1

Your original statement is deliberately exclusive, try saying "anyone" instead of "women" or maybe "women or men" and you'll avoid most of the flak in the future. Bonus: why the fuck is the womens PT requirements so low? The enemy doesn't discriminate. If they're faster or stronger, they WILL take you down. Man or woman. Making it easier women to pass is just the most "wat" thing to me. Politics, whoever gets the most women into the military gets more votes.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:34 AM
3

Tasteless.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:28 AM
1

Surgery and all?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 12:09 AM
3

Bush wasn't as desperate.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:11 PM
-10

I disagree.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:56 PM
4

I'm pretty sure you could rephrase that to be less offensive. "The political way, blowing the largest voting block."
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:52 PM
1

I never noticed how ironically backwards Rationalwiki was :/
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:17 PM
-1

Basically the same as men's issues, just less prevalent.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:07 PM
2

Or at least that's the most comprehensive definition we've managed to stitch together from the incoherent ramblings of Feminists.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:04 PM
10

Devils Advocate: Who trusts the White House on this kind of thing?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:01 PM
0

Just say that you plan on circumcising any daughters than you have and parrot her arguments back at her.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:28 PM
-1

Please use the correct phrase of "sexually mutilate".
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:02 PM
14

What?....the fuck...
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:19 PM
6

Well...that's kinda how insurance works, it's just that they're putting zero effort into trying to make things fair at all.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:17 PM
3

Both.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:17 PM
2

Proportionately more than the male congressmen, that's all I remember.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:30 PM
2

I mean, I've never witnessed any attack on a woman's femininity for eating vegetables. That might happen if a commercial depicted them as eating nothing but oh I don't know, cheese steaks?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:29 PM
1

Meh, it happens.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:15 PM
1

That's just taken 1st place at most disgusting and despicable "professions" ever.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:00 PM
-1

FUCK YOU, GO DIE!
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:59 AM
1

Abandonment? (in the military)
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:48 AM
11

Rape Culture™ is like a sub-branch of patriarchy theory where under The Patriarchy™ rape is promoted and just considered to be just dandy by society.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:46 AM
1

A) The difference is extremely small. B) More discrimination will just make it worse.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:44 AM
1

But...one is definitely better than the other :/
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:31 AM
1

Huh :/
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:30 AM
1

100% of all rapists have drunk water in their lifetime.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:53 AM
1

Either or.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:47 PM
5

How is this at all relevant to men's rights?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:44 PM
1

Devils Advocate: Unlike people who are dangerous in the physical "I'm gonna shoot you" kind of way she can be rendered harmless via a blacklist.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:43 PM
1

I kinda doubt it.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:41 PM
-4

That last frame seems rather unrealistic.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:40 PM
5

That actually is surprising, but I guess they need some kind of civilian class so when the other guys kill them you can make them out as horrible.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:40 PM
-3

Well, it means we're not the ones doing it, so they can't point fingers.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:34 PM
-2

FUCK YOU, GO DIE!
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:30 PM
4

And next, the dangerous facts about water.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:29 PM
1

I find it interesting how both facts are true, men have significantly lower white bloodcell counts both in circulation and reserve, but men also take a lot less sick leave and from my own anecdotal observation get sick a lot less.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:28 PM
2

It's misinformation.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:40 PM
1

I hate that whole theory.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:52 AM
1

You're probably going to be disappointed anyways.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:52 AM
1

I disagree. Alimony should be strictly reformed so that it can't be abused. Alimony in concept is that if a woman spends 20 years raising kids at home and is then left she will be supported long enough to get back on her feet with a job and a place to live, not so that some housewife can boy a newer model Lotus Elise while her ex lives out of his car.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:28 PM
4

I'm pretty sure that one was actually fake and a part of some social campaign.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:23 PM
0

That doesn't mean it would be a good thing or that I would agree with it.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:13 PM
0

Good for you you looked up the word equal. Now try looking up "equal vs. fair." I know what the differences are, and I do not think they are relevant in this context. Out of curiosity, how do you feel about girls doing better in schools than boys? Is that fair to you? I feel that it's solely the result of artificial influences seeing as how boys always scored higher than girls but then our current system was implemented which had the effect of screwing everyone over but specifically screwing ove…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:12 PM
0

I'm not really sure how you come to that conclusion at all. Literacy. e·qual op·por·tu·ni·ty noun: equal opportunity; plural noun: equal opportunities the policy of treating employees and others without discrimination, esp. on the basis of their sex, race, or age.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:24 PM
1

I don't think that I am, and I have already researched both concepts.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:53 PM
0

Equality. Women have an equal opportunity to win if nobody helps or hinders them, that's as fair and equal as it gets.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:52 PM
1

I thought you meant normalize for the lifters weight in which case skinny guys would win for sure.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:27 PM
3

I doubt that will happen considering how our economy is changing.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:30 PM
1

Holy shit, look what happens around 1990: The most successful invasion of all time?
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:26 PM
1

I think you're mixing up the words "fair" with "chance", fair means that start and stop at the same point, nothing more.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:23 PM
0

BMI >25% = fat, for a man. (That last part isn't satire, BMI standards are different for men and women)
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:22 PM
0

Can you give a single good reason as to why it's necessary for women to win?
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:21 PM
1

Actually, that would result in us skinny guys shitstomping the worlds strongest man for power to weight ratio's.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:19 PM
0

"implies" not "inplies"
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:16 PM
1

I could beat Kobe in basketball if he had one leg and two arms tied behind his back. So this would be fair?
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:14 PM
2

I'll get the burn cream.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:13 PM
2

A race is meant to be against other people, not gender based standards.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:13 PM
1

You're not interested in competition though, I am.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:10 PM
0

Yes I can, and yes I would.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:09 PM
2

"fair"
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:08 PM
0

Money.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:05 PM
1

Well it looks like you massively misinterpreted women to mean Feminism and men to mean the MRM.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:03 PM
2

Technically we are the first wave...
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:00 AM
5

I use this all the time and I'm telling you now it's the funniest thing on the face of the Earth.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:59 AM
2

The majority won't support it, oh well.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:58 AM
0

More like "Well we could stop eating and evolve into beings of pure energy, but this isn't a perfect world, oh well."
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:50 AM
1

What did you just try to say?...
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:33 AM
2

Reminds me of that car ad featuring women getting mad that was taken down because women got mad.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:24 PM
5

What?...
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:23 PM
1

Are you serious?...
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:39 AM
1

No?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:25 AM
1

I think that's more of a double standard in the media.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:23 AM
2

/u/nicemod made an iffy decision, but you'll notice that he didn't just delete it without an explanation, he simply said that it didn't have anything to do with mens rights (which it doesn't) and then defended his stance. Feminists would have deleted that kind of thing and banned the poster.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:07 AM
1

In a perfect world I would agree, but this isn't a perfect world.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:05 AM
3

Right away it is almost begging for mod attention because it is, as the mod points out, off topic. Only if you come to the conclusion that Feminism doesn't give a shit about men.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:03 AM
1

No idea whatsoever, I don't even know where "there" is.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:09 PM
-2

I disagree. It serves a purpose and at times a very important purpose, it's simply abused far to often.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:55 PM
2

Fair enough, I just meant in the extreme short term where he's most likely to die pretty quick and she wants his kids.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:50 PM
2

Devils Advocate: It can't hurt.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:08 PM
59

We're focused on equal rights for men, but unlike Feminism we don't oppose equal rights for women.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:04 PM
0

Was the "crotch camera" equipped with an extended zoom?...
/r/MensRights18/01/14 01:38 PM
0

Not sure on current, but I know historically about 80% of women managed to reproduce while for men it's been between 20-40%.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 01:35 PM
2

Are we still talking about the typical internet trolls? If so then I don't care who beheads then so long as it gets done, publicly.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 01:33 PM
1

Well that's just not true, they don't effect jack shit in most of the world and only negatively effect the remainder, and we don't effect shit all as of yet.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:34 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:31 PM
1

Nope :/
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:30 PM
1

But MRAs and Feminists only make up a tiny fraction of the human population, we are statistical irrelevancies.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:39 AM
1

I remember that :/
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:37 AM
1

Because it's an irrelevant thing? We're talking about men vs women, not Feminists vs MRA's.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:45 AM
4

And they will continue to do so, just as this woman very well may continue to rape boys because there won't be any significant consequences.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:26 AM
1

Not helpful...
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:59 PM
2

So can I, but I can't do all of those things plus properly wash all the dirty laundry, dishes, bathroom, floors, windows, walls and any other "stuff" which can be cleaned.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:48 PM
1

Some people think that Tits McReadhead is fat also?...
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:21 PM
3

Who actually thinks she is fat?...
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:07 PM
3

Early Sumerians and Semites in the Arab Peninsula practiced it as a form of initiation into adulthood, while Australian Aboriginals performed it as a test of bravery. Modern humans started practicing it in the early 1870s.... Yeah...
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:05 PM
-6

Being fair though, companies are largely run by idiots.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:00 PM
2

That's pretty standard for any decent housewife, 2 hours a day of cleaning to keep the entire house spotless. Yeah, they really botched just about everything else.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 10:04 PM
1

I'm to lazy to research this online, and you're suggesting I haul my ass outside?...lol
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:58 PM
1

How do you figure?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:57 PM
-13

To be fair, a lot of businesses seem to prioritize things other than net income.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:05 PM
7

That's, on par with Wall Street bankers.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:03 PM
3

I was in the process of making a long drawn out post taking that crap apart, but it's actually put together so badly that I can't do it properly without paraphrasing what it's meant to say.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:32 PM
2

They lobbies and advocated for teaching methods which were detrimental for boys.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:26 PM
2

You can't, and neither can they, that's why they make claims and back them with mantra's rather than facts.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:24 PM
6

What a pile of pseudo statistical crap.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:22 PM
20

6 months...as far as I'm concerned that's a functional not-guilty sentence.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:20 PM
1

Which is irrelevant...
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:50 PM
1

What? Just to clarify, you do realize you said that Feminism = women and MRM = men, right?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:28 PM
1

More like black people =/= Africa.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:10 PM
2

They were thinking "How can we set ourselves and our daughters up for an easy living?"
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:39 PM
1

Except they actually stab you, figuratively speaking.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:32 PM
3

Well...burden of proof?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:31 PM
1

Women who have both the drive to build a social system and the want to relax.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:31 PM
1

Fuck you.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:30 PM
1

-_-
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:21 PM
3

Kinda scary how the only thing stopping them is external force.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:44 PM
2

They think that the majority of women are to far gone and will need to be exterminated as well, the 10/1 ratio is just because they see women as inferior to men.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:33 PM
1

The fact that every domain even remotely useful for porn has been taken since before the internet was even conceptualized.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:04 PM
1

Do we know why?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:38 AM
3

Worth noting, they actually want to reduce men to 1% of the original population and women to 10% of the original population.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:37 AM
1

MRM =/= men Feminism =/= women
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:36 AM
1

I'd be massively surprised if that wasn't already taken.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:34 AM
1

"Meh", seems to base itself upon a false perception from the 60's.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:29 AM
3

, is that you shouldn't buy them as the shitty companies who sell them just spam their ads in the form of Reddit posts.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:27 AM
3

Or in some circumstances be in a "marriage like relationship" which can be anything.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:19 AM
3

Commonlaw, after living together or in a "marriage like relationship" for 6 months in BC you're legally married, it's ~2 years or living together or raising kids in most parts of Canada or the US.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:10 AM
1

The latter, definitely the latter.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:06 AM
3

Second, never under any circumstances get married. That limits a relationship to 2 years in most places, 6 months where I live.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:03 AM
3

What bullshit :/ That's literally like kicking a woman out because she has boobs, bulges.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:02 AM
0

Here you go.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:57 AM
1

Women have more to gain and less to loose by marrying those Bitcoin millionaires.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:55 PM
9

I read about how in the mid 90's here in Canada (or somewhere in Canada anyways) they made it so that construction workers and house cleaners were re-classed as "equivalent" and had to be paid the same, then construction workers started cleaning houses as it was a lot easier and paid the same, then supply and demand kicked in and construction workers got a paid more than before while house cleaners got paid less. Result, they killed off a largely female career.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:53 PM
4

And now watch as they selectively delete that entire comment thread. Regarding questions: feminist-supportive questions still belong in /r/Feminism, but those questioning or criticizing feminism should direct their discussions here. Made me lol.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:48 PM
0

Probably not.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:38 PM
2

I've got it.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:00 AM
3

They have different rules on how to deal with drunk men and women, drunk men can be treated about the same as if they were violent while drunk women cannot.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:00 AM
2

Invalid question.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:58 AM
1

Because that would be annoying and inconsiderate.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:18 AM
2

Unless we're thinking of different stories, she made over 3 million.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:17 AM
3

Both?...
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:10 AM
14

Yeah...by that definition a woman cannot rape a man.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:04 AM
19

Actually, she only had to repay like 1/5 of the money, none of which she had.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:03 AM
0

"wage" The pay gap exists and there's nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:02 AM
1

Depends entirely on circumstance.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:00 AM
1

I can see it taking off.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:54 PM
3

The former, I think.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:25 PM
1

As the other guy said, remove the middle text. Seems like a solid potential meme, "Man looses his children and is attacked by angry Feminists? Patriarchy™ as planned." It has potential.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:40 AM
11

It hasn't been advancing as much as it used to relative to men.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:37 AM
0

Fuck you then.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:14 AM
1

So what do you think are Feminism's successes that we should be emulating?...
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:43 AM
1

I had access to an oven :/
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:00 AM
15

"Thanks for opting out." is what I'd send her on whatever dating site.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:38 AM
3

The general consensus is that it's sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:38 AM
0

Well now I'm curious :/
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:58 AM
13

And to think, they have those woman only spaces not for religious reasons but simply because they don't like men.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:55 AM
3

I think you're lying.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:58 AM
-1

Bye.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:16 AM
2

I misread that, my bad.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:36 AM
1

Which do you think we are?
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:35 AM
1

I wouldn't call all of them misogynists. I think all of us are prone to recognise injustices that we experience ourselves but can easily remain oblivious to those suffered by others. Or we figure someone else will attend to it.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:03 AM
2

Regarding that 25% thing, wouldn't that mean that a minimum of 25% were falsely convicted?
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:00 AM
4

I had a really long comment, but someone else made a better post. I'm pretty sure you're just a troll.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:52 AM
-4

Yes.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:06 PM
1

Looking at you, electric appliances.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:02 PM
1

They seem to have botched a few :/
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:01 PM
17

I'd like a scientific explanation for why the removal of ~40% of the related nerve endings apparently didn't effect sensitivity, because simply claiming it sounds like bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:57 PM
-5

Welcome.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:56 PM
1

So...plea bargain?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:51 PM
1

Well...how proven is it that she did this?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:00 AM
3

Then the answer is a no, this would have happened eventually, but Feminism certainly helped.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:16 AM
5

Says who?...
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:14 AM
1

There's a huge bottleneck.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:02 AM
1

Do you want me to answer the question in the title or the separate question in the details?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:30 AM
5

I'm just imagining some 260lb bear saying "I'm so pretty, oh so pretty." while sitting there.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:54 AM
20

Blacks didn't sit at the back, it's just that whites sat at the front.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:53 AM
17

Conclusion: Fathers are way more fun, because being carried upside down when you're little is awesome.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:51 AM
7

Except there wasn't a party and your parents dragged you kicking and screaming to have the dick tattooed on your forehead because they thought it would be nice.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:50 AM
1

Depends how much you trust your friend.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:48 AM
3

They don't wipe the anything down...
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:16 PM
3

Then you still have the problem of women complaining.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:12 PM
3

Every janitor on the internet has already confirmed this.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:11 PM
1

Because then women would complain. Or they may have had a men's and a women's but the women's kept overflowing, we just don't know.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:09 PM
2

So.Much.Irony.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:09 PM
65

And yet we're the ones considered unhygienic.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:58 AM
56

It's not the food, women just do this shit for some reason.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:01 AM
-1

Always a possibility, but at this point it's irrelevant. Malicious? No, but deception nonetheless.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:39 AM
-3

Most probably do, but I'd argue that it isn't expected of them, at least not in the way I think you're implying. A naturally pretty woman would only be labeled by other women. Should the girlfriend have just gone ahead and wiped all her makeup off at the end of their first date without being asked, or should she simply have given him a pamphlet explaining her precise makeup routine with before/after photos of her face for comparison? Either don't wear it, or accept that OP can the right to bitch…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:26 AM
-4

I probably would, but I really shouldn't have to. I think that OP is technically correct, his girlfriend purposefully deceived him with regards to how her face looks.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:14 AM
179

Devils Advocate: This might be due to the fact that women tend to form lines outside their own restrooms and destroy it, so this is like an overflow for when that happens. (pun intended) You'll be hard pressed to find a place where the men's rooms are overflowing while the women's rooms aren't.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:05 AM
1

I care vastly more about what a woman looks like than her career :/
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:04 AM
3

Well now you've presented it as a challenge to them.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:03 AM
2

I'm partial to the guitars, but we should stick to the official Patriarchy™ language.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 12:32 AM
6

"equal"
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:18 PM
2

I was going to go for the Skyrim theme song :/
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:17 PM
0

How?...
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:14 PM
4

I'm just going off the title, but that sounds like complete horse shit.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:13 PM
3

An xpost from /r/trollxchromosomes? lol
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:19 AM
1

I'll have to read up some more on it, but last time I checked immigrating to Canada was relatively easy, hence why we have more (legal) immigrants than anyone else. That's...weird.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 08:22 AM
6

Pfft, I got worse than that in StarCraft II today, from my teammates.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:49 AM
1

TIL I'm edumacated :D
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:48 AM
2

Well, that escalated quickly.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:46 AM
1

Devils Advocate: Most of the time it's an unnecessary expense, odds are just one sided. Makes sense for certain places though.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:45 AM
1

And?...
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:42 AM
1

Last I checked it really was that easy, the US is what it's hard to get into. We have a lot of similar problems, but we also have a functioning healthcare system and a lower population density.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:38 AM
1

No it's not, there isn't any lost progress. Those things exist, but this isn't en example of it.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:26 AM
1

Don't hold your breath.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:38 PM
0

You don't have any.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:29 PM
2

It's a bot that records all posts, it's to stop a certain kind of trolling.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:29 PM
5

You're thinking of a fantasy world then.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:47 PM
1

Either, I say advocate since I'm not exactly active.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:14 PM
-4

I think it's stupid, it's like making someone accept a cripple on their team.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:52 PM
0

1 potentially valid source down, ~50 to go.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:02 PM
1

I probably could.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 07:13 AM
40

Because trying to make it illegal would be political suicide.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 07:03 AM
1

That's due to boys brains developing differently, assuming proper education they will catch up and overtake girls at around 10-12.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:25 AM
6

An Honest Question From A Feminist And next we get an unbiased racial view from the Grand Dragon of the KKK. Feminism's definition of privilege literally is gender equality, and recognizing that men are indeed a privileged group is part of that, don't you think? No to both the badly worded assertion and the question.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:23 AM
2

Get over the border and heat up the butter, dis gonna be good.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:07 AM
-1

There's plenty of room up here in Canada, and healthcare.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:07 AM
13

Slow down Satan.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:05 AM
19

They oppose that idea.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:03 PM
-2

I can think of literally nothing, but then again anything that I or we support they will typically oppose out of principal.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:02 PM
0

Anyone else thinking of Saturday Night Live?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:42 AM
2

They tend to hate women who have had a genuine beneficial impact on the world, like Erin Pizzey and Jeannette Rankin.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:11 PM
1

I thought their favourites were ad hominems and strawmen? And I thought that quote was from Hillary Clinton :/
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:09 PM
3

If that's the reason, and they are kept under watch, then I have no problem with this as it is genuinely beneficial to the child.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:08 PM
4

We don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:06 PM
0

He was a comedian?...
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:05 PM
8

Devils Advocate: It's easy to understand how Feminists or even women as a whole could misinterpret it this way, equal treatment to men is after all inferior treatment to what they've come to expect.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:04 PM
1

And my sister can do 4...
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:04 PM
1

I'm in fucking horrible shape, it's just that my lack of muscle is matched by a near equal lack of fat, and I'm the right build for it. I'd fail like the Soviet orbiter when it came to hauling a 120lb pack.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 07:19 PM
3

Done. Myth: Busted.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 07:17 PM
-3

They couldn't do 3 pullups?...My sister can do 3 pullups, I can do 12 before getting tired.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 02:40 AM
2

I think they need a good Zerg rushing to humble them down.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:12 PM
0

I think it's the former.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:55 AM
7

I dislike unnecessarily complicated labels and I think that people who use them tend to just be twats.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:17 PM
2

what about non-sexual?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:17 PM
2

I think he's annoyed that men are depicted as barely human morons in female oriented commercials, but I think it's just because women respond to that while men wouldn't the other way around. Can you imagine a hardware commercial depicting a woman banging a hole in the wall and then the man comes in, tells her to sit in the corner and fixed the drywall actually selling anything to men?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:14 PM
1

I know that feel bro, the woman is strong in this one.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:11 PM
1

When the images depict her eating shit?...I'm just saying that consenting to a picture doesn't make it inherently "good" or not-demeaning.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:50 PM
1

I actually thought about this before, and I think that a drop of just about any hotsauce would do fine.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:49 PM
3

Every source on the internet says that both are real, and HD video's of her seem to support that. There really is such a thing as perfect, it's just so rare that we often dismiss it as fake almost offhandedly.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:36 PM
-5

A) I can't read Norwegian. B) Norway =/= Britain.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:35 PM
0

I've never heard or read that term in my life.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:34 PM
1

I'm sure lots of pictures of topless women could be demeaning depending on other context.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:30 PM
1

Such as?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:49 PM
1

Just edit your post :/
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:49 PM
3

How about NO! to thought policing.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:48 PM
4

Oh but it can, those glorious boobs are all natural.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter