TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

actanonverba8 Archive

View 425 posts and 1,676 comments by actanonverba8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
565

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:48 AM
520

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:48 AM
470

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:38 PM
399

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:35 AM
285

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:41 PM
267

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:22 AM
263

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:29 AM
226

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:44 PM
197

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:27 PM
195

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:02 AM
187

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:06 AM
178

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:48 AM
173

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:39 AM
163

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:10 AM
161

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 11:47 PM
157

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:27 PM
154

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:39 AM
153

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:15 AM
152

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:06 AM
151

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:34 AM
149

actanonverba8/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:24 PM
146

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:59 PM
139

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:32 AM
138

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:43 PM
136

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:43 AM
122

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:22 PM
122

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:34 PM
119

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:54 AM
113

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:06 AM
107

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:59 AM
107

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:53 AM
107

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:40 PM
107

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:55 AM
106

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:31 PM
104

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:29 PM
102

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:12 AM
101

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:58 PM
100

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/09/13 07:03 AM
97

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:14 AM
92

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:41 AM
90

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:17 AM
89

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:53 AM
86

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:12 AM
85

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:27 AM
84

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:22 AM
78

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:39 PM
77

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:43 AM
76

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:45 AM
76

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/12/12 12:33 AM
76

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:13 AM
75

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:38 AM
74

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:52 AM
73

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:39 AM
72

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:54 AM
67

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/11/12 08:10 AM
67

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:56 AM
65

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:23 AM
65

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:57 AM
63

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:32 AM
63

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:10 AM
63

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:53 AM
62

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:27 AM
62

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:13 AM
60

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:33 AM
60

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:25 AM
60

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:03 AM
58

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:22 AM
58

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:31 AM
56

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:30 AM
54

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:18 PM
53

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:22 AM
53

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:19 AM
51

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:14 AM
51

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:35 AM
50

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:38 AM
48

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:14 AM
48

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:19 PM
47

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:16 AM
46

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:59 PM
46

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:13 PM
45

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:55 AM
45

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:56 AM
44

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:28 PM
44

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:27 PM
44

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:04 AM
44

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:10 AM
44

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:53 AM
43

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:20 AM
43

[Misleading Title]actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:25 AM
42

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:28 PM
42

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/12/12 06:26 AM
41

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:27 AM
41

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:41 AM
41

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:06 AM
41

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:03 AM
40

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:09 AM
40

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:17 AM
40

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:05 AM
40

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/09/13 06:40 AM
39

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:49 AM
38

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:16 AM
38

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:58 AM
38

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:23 PM
38

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:04 AM
37

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:31 AM
37

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:23 PM
37

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:49 AM
36

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:32 PM
35

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:20 PM
35

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:43 AM
35

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:56 AM
35

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:15 AM
34

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:29 AM
33

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:28 AM
33

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:23 AM
33

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:49 AM
33

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:36 AM
33

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 04:23 PM
32

actanonverba8/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:36 PM
32

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:23 AM
32

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:19 AM
31

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:31 PM
31

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:53 PM
31

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:00 AM
31

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:31 AM
30

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/09/13 07:30 AM
30

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:03 AM
30

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:32 AM
30

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:05 AM
30

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:59 PM
29

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:41 AM
29

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:13 AM
29

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/09/13 06:19 AM
28

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:22 AM
28

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:49 PM
28

actanonverba8/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:46 AM
28

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:21 AM
28

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:51 AM
28

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:27 PM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/10/13 05:23 PM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:28 AM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:39 AM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:35 AM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:24 PM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:26 AM
27

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:08 AM
26

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:39 AM
26

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:31 AM
26

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:45 AM
26

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/11/12 08:06 AM
26

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:04 PM
26

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:04 AM
25

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:58 AM
25

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:44 PM
25

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:42 AM
24

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:50 AM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:02 AM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:56 PM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:19 AM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:52 AM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:53 PM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:55 AM
23

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:38 PM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/10/13 05:28 PM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:27 AM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:29 AM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 10:49 PM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:18 AM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:34 PM
22

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:19 AM
21

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/12/12 08:09 PM
21

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:27 AM
21

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:38 AM
21

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:36 AM
21

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:56 AM
20

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:24 AM
20

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/12/12 11:42 AM
20

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:48 AM
20

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:45 AM
20

actanonverba8/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:28 AM
20

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:59 AM
19

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:21 AM
19

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:47 PM
19

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:38 AM
19

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/02/13 06:57 AM
19

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:47 PM
18

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/10/13 05:27 PM
18

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:41 AM
18

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:02 PM
18

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:23 PM
18

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:53 PM
18

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:29 AM
17

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:12 AM
17

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 08:49 PM
17

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:34 AM
17

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:07 AM
17

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:35 AM
17

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:19 PM
16

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:12 AM
16

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:41 AM
16

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:24 AM
16

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:52 AM
16

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/09/13 11:44 AM
16

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:11 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:07 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/01/13 11:00 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:20 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:27 PM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:19 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:44 PM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:00 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:18 AM
15

actanonverba8/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:02 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/01/13 11:01 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:24 PM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:42 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:35 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:23 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:54 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:21 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:25 PM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:05 PM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:23 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:07 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:56 AM
14

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:10 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:11 PM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/10/13 05:20 PM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:40 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:00 PM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:32 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:08 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:28 PM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:21 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:06 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:04 AM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:49 PM
13

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:55 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:26 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:31 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:26 PM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:33 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:54 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:04 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:23 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:19 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:53 AM
12

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:03 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/01/13 10:24 PM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:08 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:00 PM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:51 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:07 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:28 PM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:27 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:39 PM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:56 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:52 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/11/12 04:24 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:17 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:09 AM
11

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:51 PM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:55 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:05 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:43 PM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:16 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:25 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:22 PM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:24 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:17 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:30 PM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:33 AM
10

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:50 AM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:26 AM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:40 PM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:03 AM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:44 PM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:10 AM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:24 AM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:17 AM
9

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:54 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:23 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:34 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:03 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:30 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:20 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:27 PM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:46 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:22 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:00 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:03 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:21 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:42 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:17 PM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:13 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:06 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:36 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:24 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:18 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:14 AM
8

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:54 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:53 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:13 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:11 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:35 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:04 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:31 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:27 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:36 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/09/13 05:54 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:12 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:38 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 12:36 PM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/11/12 12:18 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:43 AM
7

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:55 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/10/13 05:25 PM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:31 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:07 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:25 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:48 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:52 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:30 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:53 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 05:55 AM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:39 PM
6

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:50 PM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:05 PM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:18 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:36 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:20 PM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:15 PM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:06 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:13 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:15 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:24 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:41 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:10 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:38 AM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/09/13 09:35 PM
5

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:33 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:57 PM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:31 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights28/12/12 12:36 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:45 PM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:25 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:56 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:19 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:50 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:04 AM
4

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:06 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/12/12 02:54 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:56 PM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:50 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/11/12 04:12 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:45 PM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:28 PM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:33 PM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:38 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:30 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:19 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:43 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:45 PM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:01 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:56 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:04 AM
3

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:32 PM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:54 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:49 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/09/13 11:21 PM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:56 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:51 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:13 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:30 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:08 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:28 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:00 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:24 PM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:58 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:14 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:14 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:57 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:19 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:00 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:57 PM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:04 AM
2

actanonverba8/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:25 AM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:30 AM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:53 PM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:09 AM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights11/02/13 06:58 AM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:46 PM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:28 PM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:07 AM
1

actanonverba8/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:02 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:27 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:10 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights24/12/12 06:26 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:01 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:45 PM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:25 PM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:43 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:14 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:55 PM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:24 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:24 PM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:43 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:58 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:49 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:31 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:29 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:17 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:45 PM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:16 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:33 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:49 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:40 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:37 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:01 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:36 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/11/12 12:13 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:46 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:07 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:56 AM
0

actanonverba8/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:53 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,676 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

Huffington Post: Come for the gynocentrism; stay for the misandry.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:18 AM
9

Wow. 27 years of being abused for daring to survive.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:32 AM
1

Horrible stereotyping; terrible injustice.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:08 AM
2

Hello brand new account.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:03 PM
21

All feminists have left at this point is censorship and bullying.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:12 AM
1

Okay, nicemod. I thank you for taking the time to discusss this with me. Till next time. :)
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:09 AM
1

As long as you don't link to the original, or mention any real names. Also avoid mentioning that real names have been published, or any hint as to where such names might be found. Just stick to the bare quotes, and say they came from a site called RadFemHub. That will probably, I hope, not get you shadowbanned. Is there anyone I can contact directly to give myself some protection from being cyber-abused simply out of someone´s spite or the fact the he or she has cyber-authority and wishes to sil…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:02 AM
3

I think it probably hit close to home for them, particularly the connecting of the dots between those feminists and the SPLC (ideologically and financially).
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:42 AM
2

But....but......patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:34 PM
4

I think, maybe, that changing the word-count helps confuse the ABC mods and keeps it up longer. Someone last night typed in "UPDATE:" after the quote, and then proceeded to make his own commment about why he was re-submitting (including a request to the ABC mods to leave it up on freedom-of-speech grounds). His re-submit stayed up for a while.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:32 PM
4

LOL. I think it´s safe to say they really hate that comment, which means we´re doing something right.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:14 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:00 PM
3

I´m on your side either way. In my view, the "H" is just to make it extra, special clear that we are about equality for everyone. But, as you suggested, we are the same fair-minded people doing the same good work, regardless of the label.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:56 PM
3

Too close to home for them, I think.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:53 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:51 PM
4

Thank you! Thank you! Thank you VERY much!
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:51 PM
2

Yes, of course. :) In all seriousness, I remember hearing a story once (I think from Girl Writes What) about a feminist who actually teaches that a man using logic during a discussion with his wife of girlfriend is engaging in domestic violence (not sure about the exact wording, but that was the crux of that). Not sure where that information come from. I´d like to see the source just so I can show other people.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:45 PM
8

Anita Sarkesian is a typical busybody attempting to profit from bossing others around. Yes. I think Sarkeesian´s motivations derive from about 5% concern for social issues and 95% profiteering. She sews discontent and pulls metaphorical fire alarms for $$$$ and attention. She´s a marketer without a conscience.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:38 PM
1

Brilliant article, really interesting. Thank you. I just wish politicians had the balls to do something with it instead of just panda to feminist groups. Me too.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:45 AM
5

How the hell can you deny the charge when it's all on film? Objective reality is a construct of the patriarchy. The female officer, likely a dutiful Swedish feminist, knows that she has the one true knowledge--women´s ways of knowing
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:54 AM
13

I love you like another sibling.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:12 AM
10

Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:25 AM
43

Thank you. The feminist-allied brownshirts at the ABC web site deleted it. So, I re-submitted it. Then, they deleted it again. We played that game a couple more times, then, they banned me from posting anymore. It is frustrating, but it´s also uplifting. It shows the Men´s Human Rights Movement (MHRM) is making people nervous. All they can really do at this point is censor. I´m sure they hated seeing a comment like mine that actually explained to people what happened. So, they deleted it. But, l…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:23 AM
280

This is the comment I left: Regardless of whatever one-sided stories ABC news does on behalf of feminists, it will only help the Men´s Human Rights Movement (MHRM). New people will visit these web sites; they´ll converse with others; and, they´ll examine the evidence. After all, women and men like to make up their own minds, regardless of how much feminists and the media try tell them what to think. Just look, for example, at how biased THIS article is. Already, right in the title, the authors t…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:16 AM
5

Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:23 PM
3

Thank you VERY much AlexReynard. Please feel free to share it.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:55 PM
2

Thanks, changed.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:03 PM
1

Thanks, changed.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:03 PM
2

Thanks grammar nazi. I didn´t know that. Do you know what that stuff means? Isn´t P.S. "post-script" or something? What is P.P.S.?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:55 PM
59

Yup. People don´t realize just how far along feminist are in making it a reality that any woman can destroy any man´s life by calling anything rape (of course, for men the reverse is true, nothing a woman does to him can be rape). I´m not exaggerating. Governmental organizations, NGO´s, universities, and some major media sources are adopting these highly prejudiced feminist positions on rape. Public attitudes are following suit (due to the constant bombardment with propaganda): I made a post abo…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:49 PM
16

Women nurses are quoted more in healthcare journals than male nurses. Is it the Matriarchy? Or, is it maybe that, historically and currently, more women have been nurses?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:05 PM
19

This young woman´s claim sounds like a HUGE crock of shit. Sounds like a couple horny kids being stupid in public. It sounds like the young woman felt embarrassed when the video came out and is now more than willing to destroy this young man´s life because it´s more convenient for her. This sounds exactly to me like one of the stories from the 1920´s South where a girl was having voluntary sexual relations with a Black man until they got caught, at which point she cried rape and let him hang jus…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:03 PM
7

Because gynocentrism and misandry and the feminist movement and white knights and the government endorsing it all.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:59 PM
14

Because gynocentrism and misandry and the feminist movement and white knights and the government endorsing it all.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:59 PM
56

At what point is a woman too drunk When she decides, after-the-fact, that it would be more convenient for her to claim she was sexually assaulted. Why would a woman lie about such a thing? Spite or revenge To compensate for feelings of guilt or shame Thought she might be pregnant To conceal an affair To test boyfriend or husband´s love Mental/emotional disorder To avoid personal responsibility Failure to pay, or extortion Thought she might have caught VD Other reason
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:58 PM
86

Rape culture means women can call anything rape (or not, depends on what´s most convenient for them) and men can call nothing rape. This misandry is endorsed by the government itself, too.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:50 PM
125

This young woman´s claim sounds like a HUGE crock of shit. Sounds like a couple horny kids being stupid in public. It sounds like the young woman felt embarrassed when the video came out and is now more than willing to destroy this young man´s life because it´s more convenient for her. This sounds exactly to me like one of the stories from the 1920´s South where a girl was having voluntary sexual relations with a Black man until they got caught, at which point she cried rape and let him hang jus…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:47 PM
1

I didn´t know they were friends. Seems fitting.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:40 PM
1

LOL. So, when it became more lucrative the first female Archbishop stepped in?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:35 PM
1

No; yes.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:34 PM
1

LOL. Yes! The video clearly shows another greedy male. :)
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:33 PM
1

Sure would. But, you know in reality they will interpret that by still punishing the accused (or maybe just institute some policy to make life worse for all the men in general). The vague wording gives them carte blanche to terrorize men.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:32 PM
1

For all practical purposes, no. He might be able to if he got drunk and was passed out or completely incoherent and there is evidence. A woman, on the other hand, has a strong chance of getting the police to press charges even if she was totally awake and alert while drunk and everything was voluntary. Don´t listen to trolls on this thread with their, "yeah, a man can...." false equivalence lies. There is a global effort to criminalize male sexuality and give any woman complete power over any ma…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:29 PM
3

Another stupid white knight riding in on his horse. What happens when groups like the Innocence Project prove a few of these guys are innocent later?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:51 AM
2

It is estimated that 40% of all child soldiers are girls. They are often used as 'wives' (i.e. sex slaves) of the male combatants. Sounds like B.S. Sounds like some made up stuff. I´m guessing nearly all of them aren´t actually soliders---fighting with hands, knives, and AK-47´s. There´s probably a lot of women being sexually assaulted. There´s probably a lot of girls being used for domestic labor. I´m guessing they´re just co-opting the word "soldier" because, basically, that´s what feminists (…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:44 AM
7

In response to the inevitable concern troll: False accusations, child support, custody, and divorce laws are huge men´s rights issues. Women like this, who see men as nothing more than utilities, resources to be used up, are a nightmare. They have the massive power of the State at their disposal and they use that power to destroy good men. And, no, not all women are like that. P.S. And the video is kinda funny, too.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:50 AM
3

Godspeed Nick Reading!
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:18 AM
-4

This woman´s claim sounds like a HUGE crock of shit. Sounds like a couple horny kids being stupid in public. It sounds like the young woman felt embarrassed when the video came out and is now more than willing to destroy this young man´s life because it´s more convenient for her. This sounds exactly to me like one of the stories from the 1920´s South where a girl was having voluntary sexual relations with a Black man until they got caught, at which point she cried rape and let him hang just to s…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:04 AM
2

I hope this post gets a lot of views. This is outrageous. No school district would even dream of doing something like this based on any other criteria besides being male. Punish all the LGBT kids? "No way." Punish all the black kids? "Not a chance?" Punish all the girls? "Are you crazy?!?" But, punish all the boys, and it´s "Right on." Misandry is openly tolerated in our society. It is mainstream. So long as the abusers specify that the abuse is for being male and for being male only, it´s open …
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:29 AM
1

Andrew, How did you make the horizontal lines in your comment? There are four, one above each section.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:19 AM
1

Good job making the report.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:11 AM
1

"Whosoever holds this phallus, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Patriarchy"
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:10 AM
3

Men aren't victims. C'mon, man! Keep up with the rest of the class women´s studies class.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:03 PM
2

There´s a TON of ideological and political interest involved. Rape is one of the big guns in the feminist arsenal. They hammer away at men with it. They get political power off it. They get big $$$$ off it. It´s not surprising they don´t want there to be open, honest discussion about it. Feminists want to control everything about "rape" as a topic and as an idea. They want to control the definition, the research, and the politics that surround rape.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:50 PM
2

Thanks :) Right back at ya.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:03 PM
11

I made a post about that, too.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:04 AM
5

Thank you for reading.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:03 AM
2

That is craaaaazy. Reverse the sexes and the male stalker would have been not only in jail, but bleeding from the mouth after being thrown down face-first by the arresting officers.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:25 AM
0

Do women serve in the military? Form separate female-only military units (infantry, artillery, etc..). Give them the very best in training. Give them the very best gear and equipment (better than what the males get). Then, start sending them into combat, real combat (think Second Battle of Fallujah). They will suffer high casualties and fail miserably. But, it´s better than the alternative. The alternative is to keep playing games endlessly which will eventually lead to more suffering and casual…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:01 AM
1

In the not to distant future, women will only have to show up for work half-days a day, not have to publish at all, leave early whenever they want, and still have guaranteed equal pay.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:25 AM
2

She's pregnant, but apparently the baby is not from one of the boys. Is that because she says so? I wondered that too. The police wrote a report to the judge about her because they were concerned about her lack of remorse. However, in court she weeps, pleads abuse from her partner (the apparent father of that baby) and drugs. When it comes to a judge she's suddenly full of remorse. This is, by far, a female-only privilege. Not only would a male not get any credit for being so transparently manip…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:04 AM
6

I must say, I´ve never seen anyone preparing a fresh meal on the subway. Well played.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:56 AM
26

I´ve noticed several female stars who milked their sexual power for all it was worth, then started becoming Ms. Social Justice Feminist when they started getting older. Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek come to mind. While they are certainly hypocrites, it wouldn´t surprise me if these actresses actually do believe they are somehow victims of oppression. After all, for years these women were among the pampered of the pampered, the babied of the babied. They were treated like royalty and paid huge sums…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:53 AM
9

My recollection is that the Lara Logan story got more media attention than all male deaths combined.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:46 PM
2

Thank you right back.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 05:38 AM
4

Thank you very much. I admire your brain so that makes me feel good.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 05:34 AM
1

puppet mangina I like that one. :)
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:49 PM
20

Andrew, I would like you to please consider doing something. Please consider taking all this wonderful knowledge you have about this "14 times" myth and attempting to get it published in a major periodical. I think your best bet is the shotgun-approach--sending the information to multiple people and hoping one or more will run with it. I think you should consider sending your information to all of the following (it´s just copy/pasting after the first one): Christina Hoff Sommers. She´s a brillia…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:44 PM
1

Congratulations. That´s very good.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:35 PM
2

Can you do 20 average gym pull-ups or Marine Corps pull-ups?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:20 PM
4

Oh, and feminists - because, you know, fire alarms won't pull themselves. Brilliant!
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:08 PM
5

I wasn't quite ready and asked him to stop (which he did, immediately), even though the very next night I realized I wanted him to do it and asked him to. Yes. Both mixed feelings and token resistance to sex are normal parts of human courtship that feminists are twisting around in order to poison heterosexual relations and wage war on men and boys. I heard you talking on the radio show one time about how offering a little resistance and making a male lover overcome it can, sometimes, be a turn-o…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:46 PM
2

On a side note, I just discovered that chrome doesn't recognize the words misandry and gynocentrism as real words. Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:59 PM
5

Women have had sentry duties, been involved in convoys, and taken part in MOOTW (military operations other than war). Any of these can involve casualties, by means of an enemy or by accident. Accidents can happen even in training. Military training can involve servicemembers isolated from one another over large geographical distances. In other words, if something goes wrong, you have to depend on each other until some other form of assistance arrives.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:57 PM
4

Thank you. And, I just recently changed the P.S. section at the bottom so please make sure to re-read that. I want people reading here to know that I intentionally left out one of the BIG problems with the survey (due to space constraints). Maybe in the future I´ll address it.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:39 PM
3

Thank you. I just changed the P.S. section at the bottom because I wanted to notify people about a HUGE issue which I didn´t cover in this post. Feminists, in this report, classified "attempts" as "rapes" (and the definition of "attempts" is sketchy). I did´t include that because I didn´t want the post to go on forever, but that´s where they got a large number of their "rape victims".
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:34 PM
6

Thanks.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:11 PM
9

Feminists have gotten a lot of people hurt and killed by co-opting the human trafficking conversation. They´ve done this by: Steering most of the conversation to sex trafficking, then.. Wasting millions of dollars of critical resources by alarming everyone with fake, wildly inflated sex trafficking figures, which they get by... Conflating voluntary sex work of adult women (from legal age to 80) with sex trafficking. In this case in Michigan, what they are doing is calling a girl of legal age who…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:11 PM
15

Thanks for this post, oneiorosgrip. These troll posts aren't just to fuck with the sub. They're intended to get you to think of drunk sex as rape, and respond accordingly. Bingo. Feminists are trying to do this, online and offline, all over the world. But, of course, they only call it rape when the woman is drunk, not the other way around. In fact, even if a sober woman beats a drunk man with a baseball bat and forces him to have sex, they still don´t call it rape. I just did a post about these …
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:58 PM
3

You´re welcome.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:45 PM
11

I´ll say this one more time and then I´m done with this particular discussion: They´re training to be Marines, not men who do pretty well for men and women who do pretty well for women. People who are weak links cost missions and lives. Your sexism argument is ludicrous. It´s only about people being able to pull their weight which, in the Marines, includes things like carrying 120-pound packs, carrying comrades out of harm´s way, and scaling walls and obstacles while loaded down with gear. I don…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:24 AM
18

They´re training to be Marines, not men who do pretty well for men and women who do pretty well for women. People who are weak links cost missions and lives. Same with other jobs, such as firefighters and police officers. If you´re the wife of a police officer who was recently paralyzed in a fight with a couple thugs because his female partner couldn´t pull her weight, does it make you feel better to hear someone say, "But at least the police force made its quota for female officers this year."
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:45 AM
9

The pull-ups in the Marine Corps are very different than the ones the average gym-goer does. You have to first mount the bar and sit absolutely still, arms fully extended for a few seconds until the monitor is satisfied. Then, you have to do each pull-up absolutely all the way up and all the way down (arms fully extended), no exceptions. Any pull-ups for which you fail to do so does not count. There is also absolutely no "kipping". Kipping is when someone uses some sort of thrusting motion (some…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:04 AM
49

But come 2014, women will be required to do at least three pull-ups to pass the PFT, with eight needed for a perfect score on that portion of the test. Male Marines have to complete twenty pull-ups for a perfect score. The women are being given an equal number of points for only 40% of the work. To put it another way, male Marines have to do 2.5 times more work to get the same credit. This is just a continuation of the special treatment women get. Source: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/article/…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:51 AM
3

Whether you like it or not, the professor-student relationship is much like the boss-employee relationship; making it sexual is highly taboo. He was older and knew better (and was married besides), and while it isn't sexual harassment (because it was obviously reciprocated) that doesn't make it permissible. Academia has rules like "don't' fuck your grad students" for good reasons. Brand new account, huh troll? From the article: As is the case in many universities, these relationships are in the …
/r/MensRights13/10/13 01:25 AM
5

The article does a wonderful job as analysing the issue. I couldn´t agree more.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 08:35 PM
1

The laws definitely need to be changed. They aren't working anymore, said Michau Translation: "Now we need to do something because some women are starting to get abused the way men have been abused for decades."
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:35 AM
1

Exactly. The ONLY reason feminists even bring up the wage differences are to imply that there is discrimination and seek more female-supremacist policies (and to shame men into silence, always).
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:06 PM
3

I´ll be submitting my post in the next day or two. Please take a look and critique and/or make your own additions if you get the chance.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:01 AM
6

Off the top of my head, some common ways I´ve seen feminists manipulate stats are: change definitions of words to push a pre-desired result use different definitions according to gender, to push a desired result deliberately use a skewed sample group simply omit men from the study or from the press releases about the findings simply make stuff up
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:00 AM
8

:)
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:01 AM
9

I´m going to make a post as soon as I can put it together. Just check back on my username in the next couple days and you´ll find it. The problem, as with all feminist research, has to do with deliberately manipulated methodology.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:01 AM
77

I´m going to be making a post in the future about that CDC 2010 NSIVS Survey they cite ("1 in 5" women and "1 in 71" men have been raped). That report is pure, unadulderated misandry. They deliberately worded questions and defined things to maximize the appearance of female victimization and minimize males.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:02 AM
8

One sugar daddy (government) starts faltering, on to the next sugar daddy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znl8VQIxImA I know, I know...and I agree..NAWALT
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:24 PM
2

I would assume they could automate it based on subreddit. If they don't like what you post in MR or TRP they can make it so your posts do not show in that particular sub. It would be easy to allow it do display you to yourself to give you the idea that what is happening is that no one is replying. I wish people would people would just think about what they are doing before they use shadow-ban techniques on their fellow humans. It´s really a dirty thing to do to someone.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:03 PM
2

You´re welcome.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:03 PM
3

It's scummy It sure is.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:02 PM
2

Incognito mode is good for this. What do you mean by "incognito mode"?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:14 AM
2

Oh, okay then. Thanks for answering.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:48 AM
2

Sorry to bother you again. I was wondering if it is possible to be selectively shadow-banned. For instance, say I have made 3 new post and 3 new comments in the last six hours. Is it possible for someone to go in there and shadow-ban just one of the posts or just one of the comments?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:42 AM
7

Thank you for the answer. That shadow-ban business is really unethical. It´s much worse than regular censorship. I wouldn´t feel good about myself if I did that to someone. Do you happen to know how someone actually shadow-bans another person (like, do they have to enter code or something)? I´m not a tech person so I don´t know, but I´m curious to what the process is.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:40 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:14 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:13 AM
8

Hi bsutansalt, How does a person know if he has been shadow-banned? The whole idea of shadow-banning really disturbs me. There´s just something basically wrong with not having the common decency to let someone know that none of their feelings and thoughts they are putting to keyboard are going anywhere. It´s cruel to do to someone. Please tell me how one finds out he has been shadow-banned on a website.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:59 AM
3

Hi ThePigmanAgain, How did you know you got banned? I am not doubting you. I am just wondering. Do they just like send you a message? How does it work?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:57 AM
-1

No.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:39 PM
25

Another glaring reverse the sexes case. If a couple guys went down on some comatose women in public there would be a global day of mourning.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:24 PM
9

90% of articles concerning gender issues on Salon range from moderately gynocentric to heavily misandric. There are exceptions, but that website is mostly a bullhorn for the feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:22 PM
1

In their reproduction of the whole e-mail, it says "NO RAPING." Considering that this is the whole issue being raised, it says a lot that the writer chose to leave that out of the main body of the story (even though several quotes were used). An accurately written title to a story about this pseudo-issue would be, "Dumbass college kid writes tasteless email and feminists pounce to use it as an ideological and political tool."
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:16 PM
50

The feminist are definitely on a global jihad against men. Men´s Rights can´t get bigger and more organized fast enough.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:53 PM
1

Someone needs to go put "(re: gynocentrism and misandry)" underneath and it will be a correct statement.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:34 AM
3

Krantz added that the results should be interpreted "with caution". Translation: Kantz doesn´t want the feminist mafia coming after her. Researchers also found that female victims of domestic violence suffered from more severe health effects than men, with women were more likely to report depression, anxiety and difficulty sleeping." What a dumb comment. It is well known that women report anything associated with being vulnerable, weakened, or victimized more than men. It is also well-known that…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:31 AM
1

You mean a possessor of the golden uterus is capable of doing bad things? Shocking!
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:18 AM
-2

It´s like Veruca Salt´s dad lost his credit cards and she is ANGRY.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:14 AM
14

Oh, man...that´s Hilarious!! Female chauvinism, total double standards....misandry...male disposability....but seriously, f*ck those people.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:09 AM
37

she claims to have no memory of an extramarital affair preceding their birth, which she attributes to the medication she was taking at the time." That filthy, evil, soulless woman should be put in jail. This is so disgusting and this man has been done wrong so badly I can´t put it into words. And the State just enables and assists these despicable women to abuse and traumatize men.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:42 AM
5

According to this article and these researchers, whites in apartheid South Africa who felt superior to blacks and felt that blacks were there to serve them were, themselves, the real victims in that system. The dehumanizing attitudes toward blacks and the subsequent dehumanizing policies and cultural norms that followed were bad, not because how blacks suffered as a result, but, because those whites might have felt less of a sense of self-efficacy. I have to congratulate our gynocracy, even afte…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:37 PM
3

The MHRM has a long way to go. The white knights and manginas standing around were as unconcerned as the the women. Reverse the sexes and the mob would have lost its collective mind immediately. The women and manginas would have been screaming at the guy and the white knights would have been attacking him.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:03 PM
19

Plaster her face all over the media. Put her in jail for ten years. Investigate the District Attorney, judge, and anyone else involved in letting a year and a half go by without checking/acknowledging these text messages. De-bar and fine these people (payable to the young man) if wrong-doing or incompetence is found. At that point, you might have something that looks like justice.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 04:54 PM
6

Plaster her face all over the media. Put her in jail for ten years. Investigate the District Attorney, judge, and anyone else involved in letting a year and a half go by without checking/acknowledging these text messages. De-bar and fine these people (payable to the young man) if wrong-doing or incompetence is found. At that point, you might have something that looks like justice.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 04:54 PM
3

I hope MRAs here will leave comments on that web page. I didn´t see any (are they getting censored?). Here´s the one I left: Oh boy! So much I could say about this, but no sense in going on a soapbox. I´ll just mention one aspect and say that it would be good if researchers could explore the connections between female sense of entitlement and society´s acceptance of male disposability. It´s telling that even when research acknowledges certain attitudes that females have that are harmful, everyth…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:50 AM
1

You´re welcome.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:51 AM
2

Each of these should give you what you are looking for: http://www73.zippyshare.com/v/37834648/file.html https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzrOnVPZWTSFcDRJbm1CdktKeVE/edit https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0BzrOnVPZWTSFcDRJbm1CdktKeVE&export=download The original article about this was HERE at AVFM.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:58 PM
1

Comment I left: Women have always been pampered by law enforcement and courts. For the same offenses under the same conditions, they are: Less likely to be arrested, more likely to receive a very generous plea deal, less likely to be convicted, way more likely to receive a significantly lighter punishment when convicted. Go on a search engine and type in "study finds large gender disparities in federal criminal cases", for example. That study showed that, "After controlling for the arrest offens…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 04:59 AM
1

You´re welcome.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 02:50 AM
1

My impression is that most of the organizations that go around labeling hate groups are politically allied with feminists. They make a lot of money together and help each other push their ideological agendas. If they held feminists to the same standards they held other groups (cherry-picking individuals and quotes, for example), feminism would have been labeled a hate-group decades ago.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:28 PM
2

Well done.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:20 PM
1

When asked if the RCTs (randomised controlled trials) would be repeated in the U.S., at the 2009 National HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta, Dr. Katrina Kretsinger of the CDC replied that they would not, because it would be unethical to do so! If these studies would be unethical to do in the US, then how were they ethical to do on black men in Africa? Exactly. They know what they´re up to. Bunch of unethical animals should have their professional licenses revoked immediately! Here´s an articl…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 05:34 PM
2

This has been a very deliberate thing imposed on Africa from outsiders. Please consider reading this ARTICLE about the African Circumcision Advisory Committee. Sample quote: Over a billion dollars are earmarked for this program and recipients include medical supply corporations and gender ideologues who honestly believe that the spread of AIDS is intimately tied in with the patriarchal oppression of women and aim to further spread their ideology in that part of the world.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 05:30 PM
2

They certainly would.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:23 PM
42

Reverse the sexes, a female high school streaker....maybe suspended, probably no law enforcement involvement. A lot of people would probably have twisted things around to somehow make her a victim. Perhaps they would have said things like, "she´s confused" or "she´s a victim of the unfair expectations placed on young women." Society drives males into the ground then pretends to be surprised by all the males driven into the ground.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 04:35 AM
2

Another day, another double standard.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 04:30 AM
1

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:31 PM
19

I believe men and women should be treated equally. You´re not a feminist Cameron.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:04 AM
13

Family courts are an abomination. They can literally do whatever they want to men.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:49 PM
7

a bunch of free stuff, that ultimately has to be paid for by the other half.....the men...but they don´t count Schiff nailed it there.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:31 PM
6

Deliberately making a policy that creates an even more hostile environment for males. A policy to give females even more control over and ability to intimidate males. All done in the guise of protecting females from a make-believe hostile environment. Feminists are nothing if not vicious and arrogant. Wow.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:18 PM
2

Nice article. The Family Courts are FUBAR. I would also add to Luke´s article the problem of family court judges using gag orders (called suppression orders in some places) to keep the public from knowing what they are up to. I´ve heard of cases where gag orders went so far as to instruct men that they were not even allowed to mention their cases to their therapists or ministers.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:44 AM
-1

Brief Part 2 On Barbarosaaa´s channel.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:13 AM
8

If you look real close at the code side, and Sgt. Shafer is a real stickler for the details," Hopkins said, "you can look and see it does include stepdaughters. Reverse the sexes and no one would have looked "real close at the code". There would have been absolutely zero police involvement. In fact, the only questions and comments would be people blaming the husband for his wife sleeping with the step-son: What did her husband do to drive her to this? Obviously her husband wasn´t being attentive…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:22 PM
2

Harwood, the false accuser who stabbed herself and her child to falsely accuse Wilson was a witness in a prior case against Wilson. Do you get it? Most likely, she already framed him before. That thought came to my mind, too. She might have gotten mad at him for something years ago and be determined to ruin his life. In today´s feminist-controlled environment, we don´t hear, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" very often. It´s a good statement, but I would change it to, "Hell hath no fury l…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:34 PM
1

I wouldn´t do it under any circumstances. Alll it takes is for a future feminist law to retroactively make you responsible (or make you responsible from the date the law is passed, in any case).
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:37 AM
1

The female author´s only lament is that sometimes companies sometimes don´t "talk to" women the right way. Not a thought about why any of this is happening or what is happening to men. Can´t let male suffering or discrimination against males get in the way of girl power, now, can we?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:31 AM
2

AANYYYYYWAAAAYYYYYY!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWuLVtH6vgM
/r/MensRights30/09/13 06:42 PM
2

Great article Diana Davison.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:47 PM
1

Now, now circuitology. Wouldn´t want to stop a social justice warrior who is hard at work, would you? Don´t you know that the ends justify the means for them. Telling the truth is soooooo passé to them.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:30 PM
2

This is your one-stop shop for academic references about the true nature of domestic violence and sexual coercion: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1nbiwt/massive_list_of_convenient_summarized_studies/ This academic MRA subreddit is filled with goodies about a mutltitude of topics: http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:24 PM
1

I see. Thanks for the response.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:11 PM
2

Great post thanks a lot. You are welcome. Can I recommend you submit it to AVFM? You can submit it to them if you wish to. I´m not going to.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:10 PM
3

Donated.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:20 PM
0

She is sad because she isn't in control....that is all. Yes!
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:19 PM
0

What is it with all these security softwares rigged against the MHRM?? It seems like the feminist are extremely mischievous. I wonder if that whole thing with the Southern Poverty Ideology Center was, in part, to do with this. Use the connections the RadFemHub people had at the SPLC to get men´s rights sites labeled as "hate" sites, then turn right around and use that bogus list to lobby security software developers to block the sites?? I don´t know. I´m not on the inside with this stuff. I´m ju…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:08 PM
1

The real hypocrisy is always choosing based on which benefits women more. YES!
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:02 PM
1

Young men, who often pay little for insurance since they rarely go to the doctor, will also likely see a bump in their premiums. The female author totally downplays the anti-male gender bias. She even has the nerve to link back to the May article while calling the massive premium increases faced by young men a mere "bump". 56% increase to men 21-29 is not a bump. 49% increase to men 30-39 is not a bump. I suppose a 16% increase to men 40-49 could be described as a bump, though I consider 16% a b…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:52 PM
1

Feminists are the pinnacle of human selfishness LOL.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:39 PM
1

It's not enough that we took his children, his property, and his future earnings, society then tells him he brought it upon himself. It´s true. So sad.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:25 PM
3

I would still like it, can translate it somewhat with internet software. I think it´s a really interesting sounding study. Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:16 PM
3

That´s really interesting. she feared that she might have become pregnant through consensual sex with her boyfriend the previous day. Feminists act like false accusations are some bizarre occurrence, that women possibly couldn´t have any reason to make them. Yet, we see that some women make them for often trivial reasons. How sad, to ruin a man´s life rather than face a little personal responsiblity.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:13 PM
5

If you happen to have a link to that study or can tell me the title I would really appreciate it. I like collecting references.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:10 AM
4

I don´t know, but I have some guesses as to things that might play a part: Women have a strong in-group bias. Not only do men not have that, but they tend to have a small out-group bias in favor of women. Boy´s lives are dominated by women. When boys are young and their brains are developing, females-as-authority-figures and the female-points-of-view about everything are imprinted on their brains. Most everyone in their lives telling them what to think and how to act is female....mom, all daycar…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:05 AM
5

The lobby group "Women on Boards" says the evil patriarchy is evil and wants more special treatment, money, and power for women?? I´m shocked!!!
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:46 AM
3

I agree. I´ll go even farther and say that, both in public and in private, there´s a deliberate effort to keep men dumb. I´ve read countless stories of family courts issuing gag orders keeping fathers from talking about their family court cases. The gag orders sometimes go so far to state that the man is not even allowed to talk to his therapist or minister about it. The media rarely talks real honestly about what marriage means for men, and almost never talk about false accusations of domestic …
/r/MensRights27/09/13 06:07 PM
2

A pre-nup gives the illusion that the marriage is a contract (with both parties having rights), but it is mostly just that, an illusion. If it all goes sideways a judge is going to decide how "solid" the pre-nup is. If there are children involved (it doesn't matter who fathered them) the pre-nup might as well be written on toilet paper. I´m with you. http://shine.yahoo.com/love-sex/wife-of-millionaire-wins-unprecedented-case-to-overturn-prenup-agreement-182017682.html
/r/MensRights27/09/13 06:02 PM
1

Very good post.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:36 AM
2

Little blurb I left: Thank you Caroline Kitchens. Feminists have been held to almost no accountability for their claims for decades now. It is quite telling many (most?) of the prominent voices that are able to get a platform (and not too terrified) to debate feminists´claims are female. Doesn´t seem like much of a patriarchy to me.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:57 AM
-1

Pleasant to see most of the women were giving sane and fair responses under the article.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:47 AM
3

The information we hear about men and women in Middle Eastern and Asian countries is almost 100% from feminists´propaganda. It is false. It is lies. That includes information about domestic violence and sexual assault. It makes me very sad to see normally men-friendly people, including MRAs and skeptics, so quick, almost eager, to capitulate to feminists on the meme that non-Western countries are heavily one-sided against women. It´s not true. The feminists are selling another pack of lies. If a…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:43 AM
1

Thanks for the quote.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:42 AM
3

These are referring to the FBI and CDC: http://amptoons.com/blog/2011/10/27/fbi-new-definition-of-rape-still-excludes-envelopment/ http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/cdc-being-made-to-penetrate-isnt-rape/
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:39 AM
2

I don´t watch much TV at all. But, I do enjoy the National Parents Organization (NPO) blog. According to the NPO, the show kinda sucks and is certainly not pro-fathers or MRA-safe. People can judge for themselves, but the NPO article is HERE for anyone curious.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:31 AM
1

The information we hear about men and women in Middle Eastern and Asian countries is almost 100% from feminists´propaganda. It is false. It is lies. That includes information about domestic violence and sexual assault. It makes me very sad to see normally men-friendly people, including MRAs and skeptics, so quick, almost eager, to capitulate to feminists on the meme that non-Western countries are heavily one-sided against women. It´s not true. The feminists are selling another pack of lies. If a…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:25 AM
1

Quite a good article, thank you. It´s amazing how quickly MRA´s in western countries will capitulate to feminists on the following two statements: Women have historically had it much worse than men. Women in many African, Middle Eastern, and Asian countries have it much worse than men. The problem is, neither statement is true. If one really investigates any time or place, one find that, no matter how bad average women have it, average men have it worse. Thanks for posting this good information …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:35 AM
1

I´m not a good writer, so I can´t help you there. But, I can provide you some links. The first thing to know is that the number one concern parents have about divorce is custody. That´s widely known so I´m not going to bother looking up sources (though I´m sure you can find some if you want to). By extension, I think common sense would tell us that the more important something is to someone, the more they are likely to be willing to lie for it. That´s the most important point. As far as evidence…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 12:46 AM
1

Sounds like the norm in man/woman cases....double standards. If it really went down like he says, I hope Castaneda succeeds with his lawsuit.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:24 AM
39

"Ladies and Gentleman of the jury. You could stop at run-of-the-mill old-fashioned justice by convicting my client for bank robbery based on the videotape, fingerprints, and ten eyewitnesses. But, I think you´re better than that. I think, instead, you´ll elect to take my client at her word. I think you´re gonna find her innocent. I think you´re gonna find her innocent, ladies and gentleman of the jury, because simple justice is not enough for you. You demand more. You demand strong justice." No …
/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:01 AM
1

Interesting. Thank you for the response.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:06 PM
1

Thank you. Can you please tell me how you did that? From the NPO link, when I click on videos, no unique URL´s show up on to of the screen. But, from your link, the video, and any video I click, shows a unique URL on top of the screen. If you don´t mind, please tell me how you did that.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:30 PM
16

I was surprised such a crude little chart could be such a quality bit of satire. Well done.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:25 AM
3

Add 2 parts white knight, 1 part mangina, and a drop of crazy and, "Voilà!". You´ve got yourself a Ted Turner.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:44 AM
41

Warning: Controversial Commentary Ahead. That Huffington Post article focuses on rape. The truth is that rape is not as bad as getting seriously maimed or killed, not even close. Yes, rape is horrible. But, out of those three options--rape, serious maiming, being killed--rape comes in a distant third. You may ask, "How do you know that?" My only answer is: "Because I know. Because I have common sense." Let´s take a hypoethetical question: Would you rather have the lower half of one of your legs …
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:33 AM
2

For anyone, especially someone from Scotland, that wants to scrutinize their methodology, the study can be found HERE. When you click, you will see the abstract, just click "Full Text" or "Full Text(PDF)" on the right under the heading This Article. As all seasoned MRAs know, 90+ percent of feminist-approved domestic violence research is deliberately misleading and, once the methodology is scrutinized, easily debunked. I´m not making any specific claims about this study, but I´d like to see some…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:28 AM
1

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:11 PM
1

LOL.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:09 PM
2

Good article, thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 10:53 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:33 PM
2

I´m going to leave the little humor phrase, but I don´t think your point is without merit. Thanks for the compliment about the post. Incidentally, I stole the "Ms.-Information" bit from Christina Hoff Sommers. I think she used it when talking about feminist "advocacy research".
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:32 PM
2

do these studies (at any age) consider partners' income? I´m almost, but I can´t say totally, positive that partners´incomes always count when couples are married. But, this is a great point as far as the hundreds of thousands of unmarried couples. Since women, due to their hypergamous instincts, usually only enter relationships with men who outearn them, that would mean that, theoretically, there are hundreds of thousands of women who appear to be living in poverty but are actually doing quite …
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:31 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:08 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:07 PM
3

Federal assistance is more likely to go to women than men (61% vs. 49%) With respect the_people, that comment is very misleading for anyone who doesn´t go read the article you linked. Even though it says that more federal assistance goes to women, it is still leaving an impression that, proportionately, men get a significant chunk of the federal assistance. The fact is that men only get a tiny fraction of the federal assistance women get. The 61% vs 49% represents people who have "ever" received…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:06 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:49 PM
1

This is a fantastic analysis. Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:49 PM
4

Thank you. I always feel a sense of hesitation when setting about to make this kind of post. Generally speaking, people ignore any long posts that force them to concentrate. But, it is my opinion that the false statistics department, being endlessly repeated in the media, is one of the chief arenas of power for feminists. All the bogus stats twist public consciousness. In the case of poverty statistics, it leads the public to ignore what is right in front of their faces. Everyone in the general …
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:48 PM
1

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:36 PM
1

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:35 PM
2

"But, But.....what about left-handed Dutch-American women living in northeastern Missouri working as X-ray technicians. I heard they only make 83% of what their male counterparts make."
/r/MensRights22/09/13 08:01 PM
2

LOL. I don´t even say words like alpha and beta, but you made me LOL. If ever there was a time to invoke those kinds of terms....
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:43 PM
6

My interpretation is similar to yours, except things are just a tad bit worse than you described. The law in Norway, according to the article, is that married men are automatically assumed to be the father. This proposed new policy the Ministry is pushing for is for unmarried couples. I think this is just a push to get some guy (mother´s choice from among the men she´s slept with, of course) to sign the piece of paper to make him financially responsible for the kid. NO DNA TEST, NO SIGNUATURE ON…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:43 PM
6

Did you see THIS article linked in the comment section. Apparently, the entire geneticist community has agreed to conspire against males.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 04:20 PM
11

I thought about using words like sneaky, entitled, unethical, twisted, etc... But, I think those are too weak. I think words like cruel, inhuman, and heartless are more appropriate to describe someone who could think that way. It´s not just using someone. It´s COMPLETELY using someone regarding what is arguably the most fundamental thing in that person´s life, their reproduction and offspring. It doesn´t get any closer to the bone than that. What a horrible person.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 04:07 PM
8

I don´t understand. Is it possible to do a DNA test in utero? I don´t support alleged fathers being expected to sign any forms prior to them being able to get a DNA test. No DNA test, no forms signed. Period. P.S. Sad to see Norway is another place with the ridiculous rule that married men are legally expected to be the father (read: support the product of his wife´s affair, even after divorce), even if DNA testing proves otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 03:48 PM
3

Interesting post. Seems all about the good ol´ hypergamy.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:36 PM
3

Oh look, the OP account is a brand new account. Could it be one of THESE
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:33 PM
1

Sounds like he works with a bunch of feminist thugs. He seems to disagree on him and rather than debate they go after him personally, thereby throwing him off and shifting attention from the substance of what he is saying. Feminists are thugs in general, but they take it up a notch at the universities.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 10:03 AM
10

If a woman stays with a man she significantly outearns and and, especially if, she claims publicly she is happy about her relationship, other women will start the process tearing her down and ostracizing her. I know I am generalizing and that there are many individual women, and in some cases even some groups of women, that are exceptions. But, they are just that, exceptions. Women shaming other women for being happy in a relationship where they are outearning their husbands (especially if outea…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:56 PM
1

I also think that these privileged women are far away the primary beneficiaries of identity group benefits like free money from the government and affirmative action
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:38 PM
1

Zimba Zumba, I don´t think the most important part of what you wrote is factually accurate. You wrote that this proposal: is not being voted on by the EU I don´t understand how you can write that. It is my understanding that this proposal has to go through a bureaucratic chain and, depending on what happens along that chain, only then will it be decided whether the European Union will vote on it. One link in that bureaucratic chain is the EU Women's Rights and Gender Equality, aka FEMM, Committe…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:27 PM
5

Doing that to Eddie is pretty low on the "how low can you go" scale. I wish I could say it surprises me. The basic attitude society has toward men is like toward a workhorse.....work and produce and once you can´t do that anymore, you´re useless and off to the glue factory for you.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 08:46 PM
13

Thank you for your words of support toward men. Spent a long time in the organization you´re interested in right now. There is a HUGE incentive in the USMC for women to use their "womanness" to get advantages over male Marines. Just simply the threat in the back of male Marines´minds that you could get upset a make some kind of false accusation gives you ENORMOUS power. I saw female Marines wield that power with great dishonor. I also saw the tendency of female Marines to have disdain for the ch…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:51 AM
1

It´s very slow, but the feminst house of hate and lies is slowly crumbling. The fact that they have to go on shows and say this hateful nonsense at all is an improvement from men being completely ignored.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:25 AM
1

Lille Carney, the young girl up on whom the assault was alleged to have been committed deposed that through fear of the police sending her to jail as they had threatened to do she finally admitted that Wilson had assaulted her and testified at the trial when in truth the accused had never laid hands upon her or violate her person, but on the contrary he had always been kind and correct in his deportment toward her. She also deposed that she had frequently related to her mother and to others that…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:23 AM
0

I´ve seen quite a few stories about international abduction by mothers who thinks they are above the law and that their kids are their property. What usually happens is the mothers will make up a false abuse allegation and then feminist and the media will kick and and start dominating the narrative, lionizing the mother and demonizing the father. I know in this story the focus is on Japanese women. But, even with countries that have ratified the Hague Convention, criminal mothers are often held …
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:13 AM
1

Self-defense is just about the most basic right, not only any person, but any living has. I´m happy that Michael Whybrow is okay and I´m sure he is a great chap, but his decisions serve as a bad example to younger men and boys.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:02 AM
1

Really good interview. I´m know Dr. Helen has been dealing with hostility about her book and has been going out of her way to be calm and professional so it was nice to see her let loose, even for just a second, with that little quip at the end: LOPEZ: What would be your opening pitch to a woman who buys “war on women” rhetoric? SMITH: Good luck, honey, you’re going to need it.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:56 AM
1

I really can´t remember that far back, but I think runnin across Glenn Sacks website was really the beginning of me getting interested in the MHRM. I absolutely was astonished at how HORRIBLY treated fathers were being treated. Man, I was a serious blue pill white knight back then.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:45 AM
1

Yeah, this is that man named Nicholas E. Alahverdian who was interviewed for the Breaking the Glasses. The video is on YouTube HERE for anyone interested. It´s pretty long, but having to fight for you life in courts has a way of making you want to tell your story in full, I imagine.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:42 AM
-1

Here´s my very quick, not very thought out impression. I think the feminist movement is driven by pampered, privileged white women. I also think that these privileged women are far away the primary beneficiaries of identity group benefits like free money from the government and affirmative action, even though they are the least deserving. I think these privileged women know that a lot of people are onto them, so they try to use minorities and LGBT to shield them from criticism and calling them o…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:33 AM
2

Feminists are trying to completely normalize (it´s already partially normalized) female-on-male violence.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:13 AM
2

In other news, Shaquille O'Neal would like us to know "tall people" are a myth.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:11 AM
1

shamemovie, it really depends on how domestic violence is defined. In my mind in wich I try to be reasonable and not hyperbolic, I have been the victim of only a little bit of domestic violence. But, in the land of femnists/ideologues/hucksters, I have been the victim of a tremendous amount of domestic violence. I would need to know exactly how you are defining domestic violence.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:10 AM
3

Latasha Alston, the boy's mother, also isn't sure what led Walker to Tuesday's events, saying she was shocked at the Facebook message because she had no plans to file for full custody. "I don't know what drove him to this point," Alston said. "There was never a custody battle over my son. I told Derek I wanted joint custody, so why he would say that, I don't know." Court records, however, show that Alston filed for primary or full custody on Sept. 9. Alston said she and Walker did go to court to…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:01 AM
6

For the life of me, I can´t figure out why EVERY post about this story is not getting at least 1,000 upvotes. This is a HUGE story. Feminism is at the center but this story has huge implications about the human condition and human freedom. Sorry if I sound judgy. People on this subreddit have a right to prioritize however they like. I just, personally, don´t understand why this story is not taking off like a rocket.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:48 AM
14

I think Jezebel readers are more upset that a dad is being assertive than anything else. I think they prefer the father either kicked out of the home or an obedient pawn to all female family members.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:43 AM
1

I´m not being serious, but seeing how aggressive and unreasonable she is, I thought it might be humorous to ask her, "Did I hurt your "womanfeelz" while you were "woman´splaining"?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:44 AM
1

Yay!
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:41 AM
1

Brilliant post. Erín´s personal story is extremely illuminating and Erin is not afraid to tell it. No wonder feminists have threatened her life. I hope this gets a lot of views.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:34 AM
15

I was totally shocked and upset. Exactly the reaction your friend wanted. This is abusive, manipulative behavior by your "friend". Real friends don´t use this cruel, cutting-off behavior when they get butthurt. What a hypocrite your friend is! You friend doesn´t talk to you and explain why he or she didn´t like your message, just goes straight for your jugular. That´s not someone that wants dialog. That´s NOT someone who wants an equal relationship. That IS someone that wants be in control of th…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:32 AM
1

Good post. Even when people get around to helping men in some area they have to put them down.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:19 AM
1

And they don't have to be guilty to be convicted. She just has to have enough friends on her side of the accusation willing to support her story. I´ve been thinking about this issue alot and I don´t think, in most cases, females will need anyone to corroborate their stories, even when there is no evidence at all. Look at the public discourse on rape. No matter how much evidence points to the contrary, most people,, media, organizations, and governments keep saying, "False accusations of rape are…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:22 PM
3

I don´t think I´ve ever not liked something featuring Christina Hoff Sommers. She´s great.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:28 AM
2

I´m with you. My opinion is that there is a HUGE double standard on comments related to a person´s body or comments of a sexual nature in most offices. Men really do need to start complaining more but I think it´s difficult because misandrists, white knights, and manginas at the office.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:26 AM
2

What if Typhon Blue is really the parody alter-ego of Raven Moon Dragon? Da-Da-DUMMM!
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:20 AM
3

I relate to what you are saying, not just about gender relations but life in general. If someone wants to gain some advantage over me or push hard for their self interests even if it comes at my expense, that is one thing. But, to play head games and lie to my face about it even when what they are doing is obvious, that just insults my intelligence and is REALLY disrespectful. At least fascist-acting people and groups are pushy and mean to your face. The totalitarian types, to me, are worse. The…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:16 AM
1

I´m digging that. Feminism is all about power and control dressed up in the language of equality. And, when this becomes glaring obvious to even the most asleep people, they switch the buzzword to "equity" or "substantive equality" or some other such word trickery.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:09 AM
55

When are feminists going to fight for quotas to equalize homelessness, war deaths, loss of child custody, susceptibility to false accusations, insufficient healthcare spending, school dropout rates, suicides, workplace injuries, representation in jobs that are low status, reduced lifespan, lack of domestic violence services, lack of representation in nursing/teaching/veterinary medicine/psychology/marketing, lack of due process in organizations and courts, outgoing wealth transference, negative …
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:05 AM
18

That "Peter Pan" garbage is a myth. Females get the princess treatment starting when they are kids. They get special attention, special scholarships, special slots. There are many women-only programs to assist them. Throughout a female´s life, whether at work or not, she can destroy a man with nothing more than an accusation. Reproductive choice is given to women but not men. The State acts as women´s advocate rather than a neutral mediator. Ditto for marriage. Could go on and on with female-onl…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 10:01 PM
1

Can you imagine if a patient said they preferred a male nurse? Or a female doctor. The nurse sued the hospital and won. I wonder why i cant do that? Exactly. Discrimination against everyone BUT men is bad.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:38 PM
1

Rather than thanking God (or karma or Darwin or whoever) that she received the va-jay-jay pass and is not still in prison, she complains about a graduation. Wow.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:46 PM
0

True that.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:43 PM
1

Glad to see a follow-up of this story.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:41 PM
1

Good post. It´s important for MRAs to be aware of not only the obvious ways (e.g. hitting) but subtle ways female aggression manifests. I read the books Odd Girl Out and Mean Girls Grown Up that are about relational (aka indirect) aggression. Relational aggression is also a reason that false accusations are such a problem. Starting nasty rumors and trying to undermine a person´s identity and reputation are typical of relational aggression. On top of that, victim playing is valuable currency in t…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:34 PM
1

Awesome. Getting out there in the real world and making the MHRM presence felt.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:25 PM
3

I´ve heard stories like that from a male nurse friend. He said that when he was in training instructors would make a big deal about getting consent of female patients that he could examine them. Of course doing that just re-enforces that male nurses are "weird" or "aberrations". As far as I know, no instructors EVER went up and got approval of patients ahead of time when females were entering the ranks as doctors. In fact, I think an instructor would have been reprimanded right away for doing th…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:21 PM
2

Officials said the shooting was “excessive,” Wow. That must be a tremendous relief to his family.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:10 PM
1

I really like what Jonathan Taylor is doing.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:03 PM
3

"Every year for the past five years, a study was held among 66,000 undergrads at 318 universities. The study showed that among those surveyed, women were expecting an average pay of $600 less per month than their male counterparts in the same fields and expected career paths." I don´t have any evidence on-hand right now, but I can already tell that statement is likely problematic just from previous wage gap debunking articles I´ve read. First, there is the problem of full-time, part-time, and ta…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:54 PM
12

I know not "all women are like that". But, women have shown that, in general, as soon as they see marrying the State as more advantageous than the father(s) of their child(ren), they are quick to marry the State and abandon the man. Hell, in poorer areas, there are generations of women that never even had any intention of even attempting to include a father in the home. The females in the family already know at a young age that the plan is to have a child and then collect benefits. Sorry if that…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:31 PM
2

Feminists love men in jail. Less male voters and men with prison records can´t qualify for good jobs. Less fathers around too, including the modern "debtors´prison" we have for men who can´t afford the often unreasonable child support they are ordered to pay (some men have actually been ordered to pay more than they earn).
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:28 PM
3

What a silly, simplistic graphic.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:15 PM
8

My God!! These people sound like some crazy dystopian fiction characters, or maybe East German Stasi.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:08 PM
157

She shoved you? She´s going on school grounds harassing teachers? That´s is CRAAAAZY.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:03 PM
7

Woman does not want to be a mother, but man wants to be a father. She decides unilaterally and terminates the baby. Verdict: Empowerment. Man does not want to be a father, but woman wants to be a mother. He has no reproductive choices, so does something wrong and illegal in drugging her, which terminates the baby. Verdict: Murder. That does not add up at all. At most, he should be charged with assault and whatever crime is associated with tricking someone into taking a controlled substance is. I…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:28 AM
2

That is bizarre. If he is the father, he is the father. That law needs to go.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:22 AM
1

"They weren’t interested, not in the story of an acquittal." I think that comment is generalizable to society´s attitudes about men accused in general. Great article.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:19 AM
5

Nice to see some mainstream discussion of this inconvenient truth that has been known but not talked about for a long time. I´m a die-hard proponent of mandatory DNA testing for paternity at birth. I support it on equality grounds. Mom ALWAYS is certain of maternity and now we have an easy test to equalize it so "dad" can be certain of paternity. The usual whine about mandatory paternity testing is that it is "offensive" or "expensive", both weak arguments. If it happened at every birth, no one …
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:13 AM
-3

"cyber rape" The hyperbole and victim playing on steroids is so over the top. I understand she´s pissed. I would be too. But, at some point we have to have some personal responsibility. What she is really saying is, "I sent something over the internet that got put on another area of the internet and I´m pissed." She probably jams out to Carrie Underwood´s Before He Cheats too and doesn´t see the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:06 AM
1

My two cents I put on the web page: This whole program is meant to harass men. There will be at least 3 populations of men that get caught in this net, and two of them will be victimized themselves. First, there will be men who engage in true harassment, the kind a reasonable person considers harassment. Second, there will be men that are ensnared by the kind of persons that look to be offended, the kind of people that enjoy attention and victim playing. Third, there will be men that are ensnare…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:53 AM
3

Blaming “prejudiced” mentality against men, Atit Rajpara from the Men’s Rights Association argues that “Husbands are subjected to inhuman and unconstitutional laws like Section 498A of IPC, wherein, an uninvestigated complaint by the wife can land the husband’s family in jail, or even the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, wherein the husband can lose his hard-earned property owing to allegations of domestic violence, even without a fair trial. This shows how biased we are when we t…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:40 AM
13

There are a lot of people out there who literally can´t stand the idea of a man getting any positive public attention or sympathy, especially when it is associated with the number one feminist-favorite propaganda and shaming issue, sex-related crimes. What an awful human Orr is.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:02 PM
3

Even discussions of the EXTREMELY unrepresentative sample of extremely high earning men with top level positions (like 1 in every 5,000 men) is highly skewed and gynocentric. The vast majority of top executive men have wives who enjoy the same lifestyle and status without having to do any of the work. Why is that never brought up? Many top executive males marry women far below them in terms of career success or prospects. Who really has it better in this situation? Contrast that with very high e…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:38 AM
1

Her argument was that female genital mutilation is "completely different" than male circumcision She´s a misandric mental case. She can play word games all day but you know she would NEVER accept the idea that it is okay to cut on a girl´s genitals when she is a baby. Circumcision is roughly the equivalent of, but a bit worse than, slicing off a baby girl´s clitoral hood. In utero, we all start out female. Once the proper hormonal changes take place and a male starts out on the path to male, the…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:59 PM
4

I found the full report. It is linked on THIS webpage. They have worded it so that a VERY innocuous and common thing, a man verbally persuading his wife to have sex with him, is labeled as rape. It´s insane. Husbands also have sex with wives when she is in the mood and he is not. Husbands listen to wives stories when they are not really in the mood. Wives cook for their husbands sometimes even when they don´t feel like cooking. Husbands do household alterations or move around furniture, etc.. wh…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:20 PM
4

readheadedalex, I´m with you. This is an easy reverse-the-sexes case. People would automatically and viciously attack people making statements like, "Aesthetically, men prefer women who have had their clitoral hoods sliced off, so we should do that to baby girls."
/r/MensRights12/09/13 10:21 PM
3

The rabbit hole of man-hating and anti-male double standards is really, really deep.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:52 AM
2

Brainwashed, vicious man-haters at such a young age. Insane.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:46 AM
38

The mother, who is from the Bristol area, had been refusing to engage in the court process Lord Justice Underhill...said that it was not the court's purpose to "punish" the mother Why? The mother disregarded court orders. Men are jailed all the time for violating court orders.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:43 AM
5

I also don't think you can compare rape with household chores, one is mentally and physically scarring, the others are an annoyance. No reasonable person would read my comment and make that inference. It seems you are making an ugly personal attack against me. Forced his partner to have sexual intercourse when she did want to. The way ideologues explain these surveys and use words like "force" and the obvious translation problems make this statement problematic by itself. In any case, you have, …
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:32 PM
0

If men have their own equal male-only spaces, it´s fine. But, therein is the rub.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:14 AM
2

Schopenhauer claimed that women lack a sense of justice. I think he generalized too much, but I do think feminists lack a sense of justice. In fact, I think most feminists, in their heart of hearts, know that false allegations are not rare. They just don´t care. To them, it´s worth sending 100 innocent men to jail instead if it keeps 1 women from getting her retribution through the courts. I´ll go further still, I think many of them feel (though they would never admit it) that any man that pisse…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:08 AM
1

Dear sir, I possess a vagina. So does my daughter. Now, obey us.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:52 AM
2

This was my little two cents: Males are bad, females are good. Men are to blame, women are blameless. Got it. I could accurately copy and paste that to any of thousands of articles that come out every year. Maybe, just maybe, the one-sided gynocentric view society takes of any issue concerning males and females is a problem in and of itself? I know there are a lot of women that agree with that. But, like men, most are afraid to speak out. They get called "ignorant" or "traitors" while the men ge…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:39 AM
4

They included a man verbally coaxing his wife to have sex, even though she didn´t feel like it, as rape. These man-hating ideologues are insane. Partners that care about one another do things all the time even when they don´t really feel like it. Just off the top of my head, these are some things that both my partner and I have done for one another, even though not in the mood: Have sex, cook, run errands, do home repairs, re-model, move and re-arrange furniture, do laundry, listen to long borin…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:31 AM
6

This is all about female supremacy and being able to abuse and control men with impunity. Feminists have been hiding behind children in anything concerning Family Law since forever. They really are shameless.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:09 AM
84

c0mputar, I found the full report. It is linked on THIS webpage. You can go through it with a fine tooth comb if you have the inclination to do so. I think, however, you´ve already got the gist of what is going on. They have worded it so that a VERY innocuous and common thing, a man verbally persuading his wife to have sex with him, is labeled as rape. It´s insane. Husbands also have sex with wives when she is in the mood and he is not. Husbands listen to wives stories when they are not really i…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:03 AM
2

Well-played Brian. As far as that dinner, I think http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piVnArp9ZE0
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:51 PM
5

That´s what my thoughts were. Not only that, I fear she may set him up by writing down or memorizing some bogus feminazi pseudo-facts or bogus status beforehand. Or, she might even have a feminist or mangina tag along to help her scold him.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:50 PM
3

Gonzalez knowingly Bs´ing. The state acts as the mother´s advocate. Father complains, mom will withhold his visitation and the state will do nothing when the dad complains. Or, worse, mom will make a false accusation of domestic or sexual violence. Then dad is royally screwed.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:26 PM
3

Those are some hateful, deluded people.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:14 AM
1

My comment: "Men and women alike have to complete the course in three minutes 45 seconds - but setting the same time limit for men and women was ¨unrealistic¨, said Professor Jackson. "In addition, different aspects of the test - especially the gate weave and body drag - discriminated against the female figure, he said." Disregard the histrionics. This is the crux of it. They are advocating that either females get special treatment or the requirements be lowered so that otherwise sub-standard fe…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:21 PM
3

Big effort to make those in the MHRM and especially MHRM websites look like "extremists" these days. The preferred method of attack seems to be concern trolling and censorship efforts. Love your work, Ms. Blue.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:11 PM
2

Great post. Mentioned societal attitudes, law enforcement attitudes, and the fact that erections and desire are not directly correlated.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:45 AM
1

I don´t know enough about your situation. But, options include: calling CPS (anonymously or otherwise), documenting, checking his head and taking a photo ASAP. Asking him about it and documenting his response. At the very least, I would document it for sure and get a pic.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:38 AM
7

Here´s a google scan of it: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1873&dat=19720924&id=aoUgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=sNEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3450,7238908
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:33 AM
1

Trolls I'm seeing posting here are interesting reads; however, I don't think they are very realistic.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:29 AM
3

Of all the unfairness and horrors associated with gynocentrism and misandry I hear about, the stories from fathers about family courts (courts are supposed to represent our country´s notion of what constitutes justice) often upset me the most. What is happening to you is SO wrong and you and your child deserve so much more. There is no excuse for how they have treated you.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:22 AM
3

I loved it before and I love it now.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:10 AM
5

Femistasi propaganda everywhere, can´t get away from it.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:04 AM
17

Your post reminded me of the well-known Bill Burr clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hitc8haEu_g
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:00 AM
3

Airborne pigs will be wearing parkas in Hell the day we see a newspaper article use the same language in a sexes-reversed situation.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:26 PM
1

Yes, I did a post about it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ldx07/outraged_montanans_move_to_oust_judge_who_jailed/
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:03 PM
2

I am curious because you said you were a gender researcher. Michael Kimmel is the opposite of what boys and men need. In our culture, most of the male gender researchers are similar to Michael Kimmel because they for the most part go along with the feminist ideologues. I´ll leave it at that, but I could say much stronger things about individuals like Kimmel. Something (and people) I am more in support of are projects (and people) like the New Male Studies Journal: http://newmalestudies.com/OJS/i…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 07:30 AM
3

Good this is getting some attention. Everything about rape, public perception, phony stats, rules of evidence, etc.. are anti-male and FUBAR and it were deliberately made that way by feminists.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 07:02 AM
2

Duckmurphy, What do you think of Michael Kimmel?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:55 AM
1

Janice gave a talk and what you are seeing is the Q and A afterward. The talk is available through here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1lvn88/janice_fiamengo_complete_presentation/
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:38 AM
1

That sucks. Have you checked your computer´s volume controls? My laptop has multiple volume controls (in addition of course to the actual volume control on YouTube). My laptop also has several volume enhancement options such as bass boost and loudness equalization (I leave loudness equalization on). I hope you are able to find a remedy.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:36 AM
6

Despicable.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:57 PM
13

Average idiotic person: "But, if he got an erection, that means he wanted it."
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:23 PM
3

There are quite a few people who say, "I sacrificed my career for you", that, in reality, never wanted the pressure of full-time competitive work environment in the first place. Also, there is the training. The United Kingdom, for example, has had a big problem with a shortage of medical doctors. A couple people wrote articles explaining that all the hundreds of millions spent on women-only scholarships, grants, mentoring, etc.... was all well and good, but when so many just wind up marrying a w…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:44 PM
4

Assume men are to blame. Find topic to write about. See number 1 It´s a great time to be a journalist. No effort required.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:39 PM
1

There certainly are alot of man-hating "journalists" benefiting from misandry.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:03 AM
-1

If you will help fight the multi-trillion dollar global gynocentric/misandric beast, I don´t care who you are.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:00 AM
11

Why isn´t that women in jail? If a wife CLAIMS her husband hit her, with no evidence, he goes to jail. This woman hit a man with all the witnesses in the world.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:56 AM
0

Slowly but surely, the feminists and gynocentric/misandric persons in general are finding it harder and harder to control everyone. Despite their billions of dollars and constant efforts to intimidate and censor, good men and women keep popping up and building momentum to push back against the bullies that have dominated the gender discourse for the past few decades.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:51 AM
4

Big fan of Taylor´s efforts. Hope that website flourishes.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:40 AM
18

The book "Legalizing Misandry" by Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young does a good job of explaining how feminist-infested the United Nations is. As for intimate partner violence, here´s some accurate information: http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/15f02x/dpipv_review_thirty_years_of_denying_the_evidence/
/r/MensRights04/09/13 11:01 PM
3

Comment I left: Another bogus wage gap myth being propagated, par for the course in the present time. When this gets debunked by the usual suspects (hours worked, specialty, willingness to make long commutes, refusal to accept inflexible working hours, etc..) I´m sure Ms. Kliff will make sure to write up a nice article publicizing the debunking. Won´t you Ms. Kliff?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:26 AM
1

Again, you make a good point. But, on Huffington Post, I have left quite a few moderately toned comments challenging misandry and gynocentrism and most have been left to stand.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:08 AM
2

I think you make a good point. The website wants page views to bring in advertiser money. On the other hand, I think going into the comments section and challenging gynocentric/misandric propaganda can be very useful. I have hope for a lot of the blue pill men and women out there. I think they swallow the propaganda because "women are good and victims, men are bad and perpetrators" is all they have ever been told. I think seeing feminism challenged and being exposed to a little truth will cause …
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:27 PM
4

Bravo Mr. Murray. Maybe Andy Murray watches manwomanmyth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4ZXkR8V8u8&feature=c4-overview&list=UUrIWdir3keDfqm87TIvCyow
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:15 PM
3

This myth of women´s health being treated second-class or as a "joke" has been going around since feminists introduced it decades ago. It has been addressed numerous times, but, like other myths such as the wage gap, just keeps getting rehashed by parties with an ideological or financial interest. An Atlantic article from 1994: http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96jun/cancer/kadar.htm
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:01 PM
1

Yes, that´s true.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:43 PM
1

I screwed up by linking directly to the website instead of the specific article. The "women are totally clueless" article came previous to the one you saw. Regarding JudgyBitch and her website, she writes sarcastically about what other women write or do. In other words, JudgyBitch is condemning the woman who wrote about blaming men for women not knowing their own bodies and JudgyBitch is condemning the women that are faking their pregnancies. She has a dry and cutting sense of humor.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:51 PM
1

I know I screwed up the linking. My mistake. Regarding JudgyBitch, she is writes sarcastically about what other women write or do. In other words, JudgyBitch is condemning the woman who wrote about blaming men for women not knowing their own bodies and JudgyBitch is condemning the women that are faking their pregnancies.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:49 PM
1

Thank you. I should have done that. I don´t know how to fix it now.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:11 AM
2

I strongly recommend the book "Legalizing Misandry" by Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young. It discusses at lengths how feminists work stealthily in governments, the United Nations, NGOs, and other arenas to further their agendas. It´s quite a great and eye-opening book. It is also a great book to introduce to curious blue-pillers as it is has a very moderate academic tone and is filled with cited facts.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:07 AM
2

Feminist mind: Things we don´t like when a man does to a woman: abuse, misogyny, objectification, etc... Same things when a woman does to a man: empowering
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:48 AM
3

Lots of people just love their wage gap myth. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html http://washingtonexaminer.com/bogus-aauw-study-perpetuates-wage-gap-myths/article/2512127#.UOALNm_AeiN
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:45 AM
2

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Lucknow/A-woman-activist-who-fights-for-men-s-rights/Article1-1096339.aspx http://antimisandry.com/introduce-yourself/misandry-anti-male-feminism-india-47369.html http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-964257 Those links are not really convincing or anything. I just provided them for you to read if you wish. I will say, though, in regard to gender relations, that every time I have done some digging, I find that the reality of a place (or historical period) is no…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:20 PM
3

Active feminist insertion of propaganda into Wikipedia and censoring of dissenting voices has been going on for a long time. These feminists ideologues just keep upping the ante, now offering college credits. Feminism/gynocentrism is a multi-trillion dollar global industry so, unless fair-minded men and women keep exposing them, the shroud of deception will completely envelop us.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 09:55 PM
1

Accept the brainwashing or be disposed of!
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:45 AM
2

Had this been a male, within 48 hours, all major media would be reporting: MAN RAPES GIRL UNDER HIS PSYCHOLOGICAL CARE, JUDGE GIVES NO JAIL TIME Everyone would immediately be after the judge´s job.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:43 AM
2

Good feminism is a fantasy. Bad feminism is reality. I´m joking just a little bit but that is the general truth. There are women like Christina Hoff Sommers that self-identify as feminists, so I can´t, technically, say feminism is 100% bigoted nightmare. To put it another way, if I had a bucketful of feminism, maybe one teaspoonful would not be toxic for consumption.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:19 AM
2

A pack of bigots with ugly hearts.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:04 AM
1

Women CANNOT do anything wrong. She was being empowered. http://www.theonion.com/articles/women-now-empowered-by-everything-a-woman-does,1398/
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:44 AM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x300adqdsjE
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:13 AM
2

I´ve always found the argument against a male pill by some, "Men might lie about taking it" (which is non-sensical in any case, because it doesn´t preclude the other party from taking hers), to be illuminating. What they are really saying is, "I am a person of very low character and I myself would lie to a man about taking birth control. Therefore, I assume men would be evil like me." Wow. One-third. At that young age, too. Frightening.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:37 AM
6

How feminists view harrassment: I get to say whatever I want. If you oppose me, I get to censor you.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:16 AM
6

I always get a kick out of responses like "insulted" to things like pre-nups and paternity tests. The actual issue and any ideas of fairness or equality never get brought up. Just shaming language and attempts to intimidate.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:14 AM
6

There are certain people in this world that will NEVER admit their own shortcomings. Unfortunately, with the current state of our culture, when those people are women, it is VERY easy (even encouraged) to scapegoat a man anytime they are feeling inadequate or exposed. The only thing that will alter the behavior of these people is consequences.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:11 AM
1

I don´t have your answer but I certainly upvoted because that is a very good question. I know Sweden, in particular, is HORRIBLE. But, I don´t know the historic forces that cause it to be so. DemonSpawn mentioned that the more leftist a country the more likely feminism will expand. But, that still doesn´t answer anything about the historic forces. I hope you will share if you ever find your answer.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:07 AM
2

The word "attempt" often does not mesh with the facts of life. I´ve seen people who routinely have giant hamburgers with plenty of mayo, fries, and then the symbolic diet soda for lunch insist that they are truly "attempting to lose weight". Likewise, there are people who take 5 or 10 pills and the call 9-11. Or, barely cut their wrist and call 9-11. Some people do that multiple times. Each time it is counted as an "attempt". Realistically, those incidents fall more into the "cry for help" or "a…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:02 AM
5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:01 AM
2

You are welcome and thank you for being a fellow person interested in Men´s Rights.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:03 AM
3

Great post Number357. I made a post about his myself. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ldx07/outraged_montanans_move_to_oust_judge_who_jailed/
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:02 AM
2

I don´t know how much effort you want to put into this, but, in addition to whatever you decide to do locally, I would consider scanning the brochure and e-mailng a couple MRA websites with the picture(s) and a description of what is going on. Maybe someone will take the info and run a story. I think it is very important to get out real world examples with photographic evidence because feminist will always deny everything. A couple website recommendations: http://www.avoiceformen.com/ http://www…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:04 AM
3

The Huffington Post is such a disgustingly misandric news source. They can´t just tell a story about a male victim. They have to put links under said story with typical "men are the only perpetrators and only women are the victims" propaganda. It is as if they are worried about upsetting their feminist readers. As far as the murdering woman, expect her to attempt to use the female-only license to kill "Battered woman syndrome" defense.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:39 AM
7

Male circumcision is the equivalent of slicing off the clitoral hood of girls...literally. We all start off female in the womb. The head of the penis is derived from the tissue that would have otherwise become the clitoris. The foreskin is derived from the tissue that would otherwise have become the clitoral hood. If you slice off a little girl´s (or female baby´s) clitoral hood then similar things happen as when a male is circumcised. The event is traumatic and has potential dangers and side-ef…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:29 AM
1

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:nz7Z6Ah14rkJ:sitemaker.umich.edu/sexscience.mediaproject2011/files/wu_tina.docx+psychology+involuntary+orgasm+and+rape+victims+not+reporting+because+of+orgasm&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjVPHXBy2FAjziIFZ2E90gsPTZlIpVXQV6k-1yIxqQDpjN9gQMkq2ecLPAOMTm_n-LCA3Pjn8T-2X1C-xQ5rOcdQSKhI8mqzhtjYE1o7Y6g2gJsXY5nYDI36w3Uhs_KgtM6YbZ9&sig=AHIEtbSFR6JrxTqVNJ_Dl3YL2wvvqoejzQ http://www.thenation.com/blog/169474/how-body-reacts-sexual-assault#
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:53 AM
11

Bravo, Mr. Elam. Not concerned about whether it is a hatchet job or not (so long as it draws up awareness of the MHRM and sites like AVFM). Am concerned about possibility that this is part of a larger offensive by feminists and their allies to soften up the American public to increased internet censorship. Letting bullies silence dissent is bad, in the long run, for all people.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:09 PM
3

"Rape by envelopment" must be included. Using only the word "penetration" skews the statistics wildly and, thus, increases the ignorance of the public and promotes feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:53 AM
6

Thanks for the links Crimson_D82. Those feminist tactics described by Straus are sickening but important to know. The article by W.F. Price over at Spearhead is very interesting.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:26 PM
-10

That arsehole woman is real tough with a bunch of dudes and cameras around. Joe handled it great. But, in my perfect imaginary world, it would have gone a step further. Tell her, "Okay, you're a tough girl, fine. We're gonna lock you and that dude in a room with no cameras (after signing releases) and then you can show off your "girl power". Had she agreed, the subsequent ass-kicking she received would have been, in the long run, good for her (and everyone that has to deal with her).
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:26 PM
2

Your comment made me smile. I'll help hand them out.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:21 PM
1

and pretty much a rapist. That's a VERY interesting subject you bring up that deserves a lot of discussion. It's the place where female psychology, female hypoagency, female in-group bias, lack of male in-group bias, power of the State, as well as other factors brew into a perfect storm that puts men in great peril. Here's a comedic anecdote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4hNaFkbZYU
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:01 AM
5

Men objectify women ALOT on their looks. Women objectify men moderately on their looks, moderately on their protective abilities (e.g. height) and ALOT on their ability to generate money. If we're being honest, women objectify men significantly more than men objectify women. Look at romance novels. The male lead is usually tall, handsome, and rich.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:15 PM
3

In response to the moronic quote from the exec that the OP used as the title: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13000
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:43 AM
1

I'm sure you could easily "go to war" with your mom and win (even if she would never admit it). But, she's got all kinds of advantages on you (in the culture, in your family, etc.) and your life will probably be made hell. If you were to keep a journal and analyze things she says, reads, watches, I'm sure you will find all sorts of subtle and not-so-subtle sexism against men. I'm also sure your mother does not go out of her way to comment on, at least, most of it. Also, you could also analyze an…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:38 AM
0

This is part of a disturbing, much larger issue. Trying to brainwash children, especially the younger ones, behind their parents' backs in a public education system is disgusting. I'm against ANYONE doing it. Right now, the most harm is being wrought from the leftist types (people that have "progressive", communist, socialist, etc... political beliefs). This, naturally, includes the feminists.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:22 AM
10

Great job taking a stand against bullies.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:12 AM
1

Link got busted. Here's a fresh link: http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/women-lie-cheat-and-steal-1131837
/r/MensRights26/01/13 10:41 AM
2

2 + 2 = 5
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:59 AM
4

Reminds me of the Good Mangina Project website. It's all about shaming men who are not properly servile or "feminist-approved". Quickly, it came to my attention that a major theme was demonizing father's rights advocates. Of all the people in the MRM to insult so carelessly, doing so to father's rights advocates shows great shamelessness. There are, literally, truckloads of documentation, as well as hundreds of thousands of broken men and millions of damaged children, evidencing how dysfunctiona…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:41 AM
3

The book Spreading Misandry does a great job of showing anti-male media bias. Newspaper columnists showcase this difference. Male columnists generally write about politics, economics, foreign policy, etc. Female columnists generally write about gender issues. This issue goes throughout the culture. There are, in all likelihood, at least 1,000,000 + jobs, occupied by women, throughout the western world that are kinda useless and are more about careerism and ideology than anything else. For a micr…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:33 AM
40

Tens of thousands of men are stripped of their finances and dignity in family courts every year via anti-male abuse and/or interpretations of the law.......crickets. One woman feels similar pain via straightforward interpretation of the law....major media coverage. What a crock of bullsheite.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:54 AM
1

"As long as you stay within the confines of what us 'social justice' thugs want, your speech is free."
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:27 PM
2

Despicable. Women get preferential treatment throughout law enforcement and judicial system, at all levels. However, this "Battered Woman Syndrome" is really quite something. This legal abomination wishes to "officially" make women gods, with the power of deciding life or death within their hands. It is absolutely misandric and absolutely unjust on the face of it. YouTube user manwomanmyth has a good video about it. Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEo4Ha4O_uM
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:34 AM
23

Despicable. Women get preferential treatment throughout law enforcement and judicial system, at all levels. However, this "Battered Woman Syndrome" is really quite something. This legal abomination wishes to "officially" make women gods, with the power of deciding life or death within their hands. It is absolutely misandric and absolutely unjust on the face of it. YouTube user manwomanmyth has a good video about it. Just type "Domestic Violence - The Battered Woman" into your YouTube search bar.…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:34 AM
9

Sounds like a personal problem to me. The man did nothing wrong (or discourteous for that matter). If she has a problem with normal things in life, it is HER responsibility to adjust HERSELF. Walk with a mirror in your hand. Find a chaperone. Whatever. It's her issue, not anyone else's.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:27 PM
2

Thanks for your service. Former Marine here. Are you Navy or Marines?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:18 AM
1

Thanks for the link. It was humorous because I made a comment earlier about a book I read whose author turns out to be the same person who co-authored the study mentioned in your linked article. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/16qx5e/the_idea_that_women_dislike_being_financially/c7yr8xv
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:40 AM
2

And, beyond any of that, there is also the HUGE matter of motivation, and that also has a strong biological, evolutionary basis. Just because someone "can" do something (i.e. ability), doesn't mean they want to. The average man and the average woman have different (in kind or in degree) biologically based motivations. In short, they tend to have different likes and drives.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:31 AM
6

Your thinking is right on. The lie that feminism was once about equality pervades even the MRM. It has never been about equality. I have read numerous historical documents and read several old books that document this. If you ever get around to reading any of these below, you'll get an idea. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/168s6d/book_reccomendation_the_fraud_of_feminism_by/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/16jow7/book_recommendation_legal_subjection_of_men_by/ http://www.…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:21 AM
5

I can't remember what book it was. I think it was the book "Is There Anything Good About Men?" by Roy Baumeister (great book by the way). But, in it he talks about how this "sex drive" issue is one of the feminist areas of interest. Feminists, according to Baumeister, wish to promote the "the average woman has just as high of a sex drive as the average man" image, despite the evidence. He, basically, says that the average woman does indeed have a much lower sex drive and that any charade to the …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:47 PM
24

Good story. Feminist or not, that kind of double standard story is common (along with the phony "equality" talk). Female "hypergamy" and self-interest is oft more the rule of the day than equality.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:33 PM
4

Here's two links to some historical data, including, I think, specifically what you were looking for. Also, the last two links are for more modern information, including the way male victims of domestic violence are treated. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/13041q/historical_records_from_the_19th_an_20th/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/16jow7/book_recommendation_legal_subjection_of_men_by/ http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/15tg51/dvstudy_the_gender_paradigm…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:10 PM
2

The hypoagency semantics and pleas would not be as shameful if they were used consistently. However, that is not the case. The hypoagnecy language is instead only used when it is convenient. For example, if a woman showed poor judgement (e.g. the pregnancy-by-affair example you gave) or committed a crime (e.g. the murder example you gave), the hypoagency language is put forward. But, when it's something good (e.g. a personal or professional accomplishment) the hypoagency language is removed (eve…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:06 AM
6

Yes. From what I've read (wish I could remember the exact sources but I cannot), about 9 out of 10 rapes are about sexual and emotional frustration. In only about 10-15% of cases is hatred of the opposite sex or power the motivation.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:10 PM
1

Glad to hear you found it helpful.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:56 PM
1

I know in the book "Fraud of Feminism", Ernest Belford Bax refers to "Modern Feminists". That book was published in 1913. And, of course, Anthony and Stanton are referred to now as 1st wave feminists. It is an interesting question you have though. I can't pinpoint it to an exact year for you at this time.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:55 PM
3

Here's the best I've got right now: White Knight - a man, addicted to female approval, who eagerly jumps in to repel or slay (metaphorically speaking) anything, or anyone, a woman says is causing distress. Their addiction causes them to act impulsively, showing little to no judgment. Their actions are often in direct contradiction to what may be called fairness. They single-handedly bear a large portion of responsibility for a culture of misandry and for acceptance of selective female hypoagency…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:06 PM
7

Here's an interview with Norah Vincent (Howard Stern show): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzYF2oOLn70
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:32 PM
4

Thanks for posting this. I used to have a copy of "Self-Made Man" but I lost it in a move. Good reminder.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:11 PM
7

This is a FANTASTIC post. If women seeking help for domestic violence were ignored and given the phone number to a batterer's program, there would, very quickly, be riots in the street and feminists' outrage on every news network. And, the part I quote below describing how much incredibly better women seeking services are treated and supported really got me: These findings are in stark contrast to ratings of social services by battered women. For example, in a study of 119 women who sought servi…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 12:28 PM
1

I agree with everything you said. Where is the organization? That's what the MRM lacks most. As a rule, men value themselves very little, much less their fellow men. We have no group identity at all. We have to learn how to be proud of ourselves as men and to feel a sense of kinship to other me as men. Women CRUSH us on this question of in-group loyalty and bias. So, in any dispute, we see both women and men automatically taking the woman's side. Anyone who disagrees usually doesn't say anything…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:36 AM
3

Thanks for the info tozion. Feminism is a totalitarian neo-Marxist movement. It does not tolerate freedom of thought, times 100 if a member of the "oppressor" class dissents.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:41 PM
111

What is "feminist class"? I DO NOT doubt what you said. I'm just wondering. High school? College? What class specifically? And, any good juicy details would be cool. What's the teacher/professor like? What are your classmates like? What was the reaction? If you don't want to go into it I understand. I'm just curious.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:17 AM
2

Ain't it the truth. I've decided, when I have spare time, I'm going to try to dig up some historical documents. I want to find out what people were saying about the sexes and specific issues (e.g. voting) back in the day. Feminism has done a spectacular job of creating a "fake history" that is generally, at this point, taken as true on the face of it and common knowledge. If nothing else, I just want to disinfect my own mind.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:49 AM
1

What kind of things is Dr. Paul going to be doing?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:26 AM
1

Feminism has never been, nor is any of this "girl power" shrieking, about equality. I think it makes your blood boil because these people treat men (and women who don't agree with them) as if they are stupid. They keep saying "equality" but their actions all say "female supremacy". And, they are not, yet anyway, held accountable for this conduct.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:16 AM
3

It's amazing. Men (as a group), we never learn. This same story, men unwilling to look at women in a realistic light, has been going on for, at least, a century (from what I know from reading). It's a bizarre phenomenon, like males just want to be abused or something.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:35 PM
4

My beliefs align with your beliefs. I hate to ask you something so tedious, but you don't happen to remember the show (or any details like date, etc..) that he prosecutor was on, do you? I'd like to get a hold of that clip.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:02 AM
11

We have a winner.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:33 AM
2

:)
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:32 AM
2

Oh Dear. You're freaking people out with your truth telling.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:31 AM
5

What moral courage! I salute you,sir.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:29 AM
3

Definitely. Both typos came out as legitimate words. I mean "ring leader".
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:22 AM
5

My hypothesis: She's been getting away, figuratively speaking, with murder for years because she is a woman. She's 39 and she's not being pampered and exempted from rules males have to follow quite as much as she used to be. She perceives less pampering and special treatment (though still being treated better than the average male) as mistreatment. She figures, "Hey, this working stuff sucks. I'm 39 anyway." So, she decides to try to cash-in and leave because she does not want to stay and work i…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:56 AM
13

Yes, indeed.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:51 AM
15

Translation: "We're better than men. We deserve to control everything." Media reaction: Applause. Had that remark been about woman, or about a race, or about a religion, or anything else, the person who uttered it would have been immediately slammed for being a supremacist or racist (or whatever word was applicable). Instead, a U.S. Senator feels that she can talk in such a manner to mainstream news sources with comfort and immunity. Saddest of all, Feinstein's right in that there will be no rep…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:50 AM
2

since I left farm country. The farm girl knows her stuff.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:44 AM
3

Progress has been made - your presence here (along with a multitude of other feminist trolls) is evidence of that progress. You should probably make up your mind on your stance before starting a discussion like this. It would help you to stay more consistent. :) So let's look at what Elam wrote, the context which surrounds the segment That seems smart.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:40 AM
5

I love Camille (though I don't agree with everything she says). She's very bright and refreshingly straightforward.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:31 AM
4

"In response to the family member's concern, the ME's office ordered comprehensive toxicological testing, including screens for cyanide and strychnine," according to a statement from the Office of the Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle. Had this been a woman drop dead mysteriously soon after winning the lottery, officials would have made it a priority to check for poisoning. I feel certain there are a great many female killers that "get away with it" because of this double-standard in …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:30 AM
-3

So far what has been the case is that when women do move into challenging male-dominated spheres, they simply get special treatment and less responsibilities. I agree with you, though. I would like to see them do everything men do.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:26 AM
0

This is a very good post ozymodeus. I've suspected for a very long time and know for a shorter time that these things were going on. But, it's nice to see a detailed first-hand account. This one was a bout people trying to control the message in a pro-Israel fashion. But, I've often imagined there are feminists out there getting paychecks or college credits to do this sort of thing. There are billions that go in to feminist causes and organizations and feminism has a terrible reputation for hone…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:05 AM
0

Feminism: Rights without responsibilities for women, responsibilities without rights for men. MRM: Rights and responsibilities for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:51 AM
9

A man would have gotten worse, but this woman did actually get some punishment for the crime she committed. I've seen MANY cases where women actually perform sex acts on underage boys and STILL GET NO JAIL TIME.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:49 AM
1

Wow. What a bunch of lies. Misandry for profit.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:47 AM
19

Proxy violence and female bloodlust 101. Let's see if she gets her appropriate punishment. The way it usually goes, a male read linger is said to have "coerced" a female participant and the female ringleader is said to have been "conufsed" or "mentally ill" or some other such nonsense. Edit: male "ringleader" not "read linger"
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:44 AM
3

Start one up and then you can have geographically-relevant material.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:42 AM
3

Feminists want more, more, more and isn't actually about equality. Nothing's changed since the beginning of the movement.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:42 AM
8

This is a forensics journal article. Read into it whatever you wish: http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:39 AM
2

When I was a boy (long ago), just hearing the word rape was unsettling. Feminists are so cheapening the word by using it as a propaganda tool and political club for which to beat men over the head, it's hard for me to believe that young men or women nowadays have the same visceral reaction to the word as was the case in my youth. If I were a real forcible rape victim, I would find the politicizing and manipulation of the word to be quite offensive.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:36 AM
8

There are tons of Europeans in the MRM. Like in America, some are focused on certain areas more than others. Some of the European father's rights organizations have been trailblazers and inspiring for all of us in the MRM. A lot of people on here are European. What do you mean by branch? A separate subreddit? I'm not understanding what you are trying to say.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:29 AM
57

More "women are gods" legislation...with unilateral power to decide the lives of others and trump the rights of others.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:25 AM
3

Thank you salient_punt
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:23 PM
4

Can you link to some good info on this salient_punt? Sounds like more misandry craziness. Feminists just have SOOOOO much money and support they can run multiple propaganda campaigns and churn out new propaganda continuously. Men are certainly under siege.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:15 PM
1

What strikes me most about that video is that the female firefighter, Jane, really does look like a female badass. She's tall and looks strong. My guess is that she could physically overpower 90% of other women. Yet, even she can't perform a task that is not terribly difficult for any average man with a decent level of fitness. I found that to be quite striking.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:15 PM
2

Good post MRMRising. The issue of the truth being the truth, regardless of the speaker, is certainly true and obvious. There's also another HUGE problem with feminists throwing around the word "privilege". Women control the narrative almost completely in any matters concerning the sexes. Women have strong in-group bias. Feminists have a multi-billion dollar a year apparatus, including a fawning media and government. Most men either fall into the category of not wanting to get involved or white k…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:42 AM
2

HarbingerofDoom, the following links to a pretty long post that talks about all facets of marriage, courts, and custody. The report the post links to is much longer still. But, if you ever take time to read it, you will find the state of marriage, courts, and custody for men is incredibly deplorable with the routine victimization of men in the most cruel and unethical manners. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/159y4r/academic_review_the_myth_of_deadbeat_dads_2002/
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:30 AM
1

Feminist dominate the gender narrative and use it to demonize men. They affect the media, what's taught on campus, the training of law enformcent, judges, etc.. They have feminists throughout the judicial process (advocates, social workers, etc..). I've got much bigger fish to fry focusing on misandry and victimized men.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:16 AM
0

A forensic journal article about false rape accusations: http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm Also, be aware. Feminists have completely infiltrated training of judges, police officers, etc.. What they are continually working on is changing definitions and procedures to where it is nearly impossible for officials to record a rape allegation as false (despite it being very obvious that it is). They pull the same shenanigans with domestic violence, murder, you name it. If it's so…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:09 AM
2

It really is something to behold. Discover is a very big, very mainstream company. In these days of identity politics and viral online boycott campaigns, all companies (especially the big established ones) are super careful not to offend. They are scared to death of offending Blacks, the LGBT community, Jews, Hispanics, women.....you name it. But MEN, men as a group they insult mercilessly (I know Blacks, Jews, Gays, etc.. are men too....I'm talking about being insulted as a man versus as Black,…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:04 AM
1

The average female porn actress makes many times what the average male porn actor makes. Most porn men watch is completely focused on the woman. Her signals that she is enjoying herself and "getting off" is part of what helps masturbating men "get off". The better the actress she is (moans don't sound overly fake) or the more she is actually getting off, the more stimulating it is for the masturbating man. There are other forms of porn that are niche-specific. Those I"m not really familiar with.…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:55 AM
1

I think the writer was venting and exaggerating to make a point. But, certainly fatherlessness and misandry are twin elephants in the room when it comes to male delinquency that almost never get mainstream coverage.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:38 AM
3

Announcement: "The university's gender studies department will be hosting a showing of the film "Girls Against Boys" in the Susan B. Anthony Memorial Auditorium..."
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:36 AM
5

Great comment.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:24 AM
1

Wow. "Men slaughtered in Bosnia.....Women Going after power." In business, people like that are called "sharks" or "vultures". Men already work as much or more than women overall (when all types of work are considered). I'm anti big government. But, for the sake of argument, let's say I accept the making of laws to say men should have to do as much housework. There must then also be laws demanding women do as much work on the car, household repairs, work outside the home, etc... I'll bet the Cos…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:22 AM
0

I liked it Feministsarepureevil. Just make up stuff and exaggerate. You will then be just as honest and intellectually rigorous as feminists.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:04 AM
8

It was a strong video. The feminist herstory surrounding voting is one of their major propaganda tools.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:59 AM
1

manwomanmyth makes some really good videos. Not only are there no quotas for men in female dominated areas, they SURE AS HELL would not lower standards for men coming into them. I say give women FULL equality. Create two branches of everything in society............soliders, cops, firefighters, plumbers, engineers, miners, etc.. For each occupation, there will be an all-female force and an all-male force. Then, women can show how empowered they are when all the excuses are removed.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:56 AM
2

Maybe Michael Salter will get an extra pat on the head for being such a good little mangina.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:46 AM
1

Yes. Forget how hard a job is, how hard people are willing to work to get their money, or the laws of supply and demand. Just pay more simply because they are women even if their jobs are much easier. It is also a double whammy. "Community and social services" jobs are mostly directed specifically at giving only women help and entitlements and very often are involved in the demonizing of men.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:42 AM
2

Yup. "We want equality!!! .... as long as we're more equal than everybody else."
/r/MensRights07/01/13 08:20 PM
1

I see what you're saying. Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 08:19 PM
5

Well, I guess I'll give myself a big pat on the back..lol. The contempt for men and view of men as second class citizens is crazy.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:07 AM
2

Here's the list of reasons false allegations are made from the Air-Force study (sure enough, extortion is on it): Spite or revenge Compensate for feelings of guilt or shame Thought she might be pregnant Conceal an affair Test her partner's love Mental or emotional disorder Failure to pay Extortion Thought she might have caught VD Other Source: McDowell, Charles P., Ph.D. "False Allegations." Forensic Science Digest, (publication of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations), Vol. 11, N…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:09 AM
4

Feminist one breath: "Women are smarter and more capable than men. We are women; hear us roar." Feminist next breath: "Women need special entitlements and protections for everything." Skeptical Man or Woman: "Um. I think you sound a little hypocritical." Feminist: "No I Don't!!!! You're a misogynist!!! (or, in the case of a female dissenter, they would say she is "self-hating").
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:04 AM
8

As soon as a lot of money and attention are to be had with libertarianism, feminists will try to take it over.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:00 AM
1

I'll put some money in the hammer then hit Bailey with it. Seems like an all-around solution.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:58 AM
6

I have nothing to do in terms of being active with the skeptical or atheist (is it the same thing? I don't know) communities. But, I've kept up a little bit with this and it seems like such a crappy thing these totalitarian, professional victim, control freaks like Rebecca Watson are doing. It's ridiculous and it's a sad state of affairs that it seems to be working for them.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:56 AM
1

To paraphrase from Full Metal Jacket....she "talks the talk, but does she walk the walk?" I say let her find out for herself.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:53 AM
7

LOL. I'm sure they would welcome you with open arms.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:50 AM
0

Feminist response: "It's all because evil men and these women, due to the burdens place on them by the evil men, are now acting in the best interest of the child."
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:49 AM
6

Mandatory routine paternity testing. (could name several things, but you asked for just one)
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:41 AM
55

Pretty amazing and, like you said, inspiring. From the bodybuilding.com forum: -OP and his neutral roommate gives statement to cops, female cop tries to get OP to drop it, no dice -OP's course leader tries to get him to drop it, no dice So, arrogant person from a powerful family with a history of violence commits another assault and all the authority figures are telling the victim to stop complaining and drop the complaint?? Wow, this is a real clear-cut "if your reversed the genders" example.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:36 AM
23

A great list, picking a favorite is difficult. But, I must say I liked this one most: We are fully-actualized, independent human beings who do not ever need to take responsibility for our own actions.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:25 AM
17

This is the very standard line nowadays for feminists and anyone else who wants deny or ignore misandry or feminist excesses, double standards, or hate. It's designed to take someone off guard and to shun all accountability. "Oh, yes, men do have it rough........due to patriarchy." In other words, they are saying that misandry isn't a big issue, feminism isn't bad, and that men have only themselves to blame for any injustices they suffer. The Yiddish word for this is chutzpah (means "nerve" or "…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:21 AM
49

What an odd sign. One the one hand it is highly offensive, as OP alludes to, that "fathers" have to be mentioned after the word "parents" has already been used. On the other hand, I have some ideas about how a sign like this might come into existence. My guess is that, anytime 'parents' or 'family" is used to designate a space, mothers (not every individual, but in general) take over and bully fathers that try to use the same space (e.g. nasty looks and comments, complaints, implying a man is a …
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:14 AM
2

I'm glad I found it. Something tells me feminists don't care for Dr. Hakim very much.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:53 AM
2

Thank you oneiorosgrip
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:29 PM
2

The law is for immigrants, illegal or not.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:28 PM
1

Shit makes me upset. Damn.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:40 AM
1

Wow. So horrible. Looks like the same thing as with domestic violence...all the incentives on "finding problems" and strong-arming citizens. Men are the victims of this with the domestic violence industry, parents (more so women because they are often single parents) in the child protection industry.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:55 AM
1

CPS makes money (I assume) from any involvement (even bogus) calls, so I figure it's unlikely to change. Bureaucracies and their inbuilt desire to maintain and expand themselves are dangerous enough. Bureaucracies that can be used as weapons (e.g. CPS) are on an all-together different level.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:37 AM
1

Thank you for that reply. Oh my goodness. Just reading that made me think about restraining orders, that' s a hellish issue all by itself. I've read a lot from Gleen Sacks (back in the day) and from Fathers and Families. It seems restraining orders are routinely used simply to get an advantage in divorce court or out of spite.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:51 PM
1

That is AMAZING. Thank you VERY much. While I'm here, I wanted to ask you if you know about something. How is it that these feminists are able to worm their way into training law enforcement officers? They get anti-male (e.g. primary aggressor) policies and attitudes instituted in police forces across the country. How does that work? Is it part of VAWA? Are they going through state legislatures? A different federal law? Just going in and doing it with no law to back them up? How does that happen…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:05 PM
1

Thank you for the links.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:55 PM
1

LONG read, but amazing and informative (and heartbreaking): http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/159y4r/academic_review_the_myth_of_deadbeat_dads_2002/
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:38 AM
6

Insurance companies using their charts to categorize individuals into demographic groups for cost predictions (and subsequent rates) bothers me somewhat.. Feminists trying to get laws made to change this ONLY when women pay more (e.g. health insurance) pisses me off.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:33 AM
5

Yes. Feminists constantly muddy the water that by the time one of their lies is debunked, they've created five more. They just keep trying to overwhelm the culture with their propaganda and attacking anyone who dare speak against them. It's madness.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:29 AM
1

Excessive over-exposure and over-politicization of one woman's tragedy and subsequent calls for feminists' rescue using big government has never worked out well.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:27 AM
2

The older methods of academic defense and attack died out with startling rapidity, says Ong, because of the entrance of women into higher education. Contestive, combative educational methods that had worked satisfactorily for all-male schooling now came to seem violent, vulgar, silly. A man could attack another man verbally, and was expected to do so, but to attack a woman, either physically or intellectually, was thought ignoble... This is a strong post. I hope it gets a lot of attention.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:25 AM
2

This is a brief article with a rebuttal from Graduate Careers Australia: http://www.news.com.au/national/govt-agency-oversimplifed-gender-pay-data-graduate-careers-australia-says/story-fncynjr2-1226547949451
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:23 AM
1

Damn right TMF.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:19 AM
1

Thanks for posting that. I was going to do the same until I saw you do it. If we could clone oneiorosgrip feminists would soon be in a retreat.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:19 AM
7

I have noticed that feminists tend to deploy the same tricks around the same time across the globe. They tried this same "new graduates wage gap" trick recently in America. Here's the debunking: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html Still I have to give feminists credit for their organization, loyalty, tenacity, and funding power. They're certainly determined to control men and spread propaganda.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:13 AM
2

http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:07 AM
3

Do you think part of this is to do with her finding out he got a higher paying job? It seems he's in a terrible spot with this. A lawyer seems like the first thing to do for sure.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:06 AM
1

I thought your post was fine. A little venting about something farked up is understandable.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:05 AM
5

Arias is a homicidal maniac. She is going for the "Battered Woman Syndrome Defense" I submitted a policy analysis on feminist jurisprudence recently. Here's a little of what it says in the report about battered woman syndrome. "While feminist legal thinkers take a cavalier attitude toward procedural safeguards for male defendants, their views shift radically when the other sex stands accused. To Lenore Walker, members of the patriarchy’s ruling class not only are not entitled to traditional civi…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:01 AM
8

Lukewarm message at best for men and father's rights. She seems to think the solution is to keep increasing the size, power, and intrusiveness of the state. She seems to think the state shelling out billions to single mothers and censoring everything to raise the kids for them is the solution. She never mentions "fathers" directly and seems more concerned with not letting her political opponents steal her party's thunder on this issue, that is getting harder and harder for feminists to deny (des…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:46 AM
2

Good post Estephe. Hey Estephe, any good historical sources on UHofM regarding married men's obligations under law in the old days? I know men's obligations were rough (e.g. going to jail for his wife's debts), but I need evidence. If you are able to assist, I would appreciate it.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:51 AM
46

You have a right to defend your personal dignity, sexuality, and your body. You gave proper warning. You did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:43 AM
2

feminist trolls and a ridiculously diluted version of men's rights often expressed You got that right Ernest. Speaking of which, I have your book on my bookshelf. Gonna read it after finishing the book I'm currently reading.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:59 PM
5

This is a good post but, not surprisingly, they really didn't discuss the elephant in the room. School, particularly grade school, is dominated by female teachers. The atmosphere is feminized. Add to that the impact feminists (and their supporters of both sexes) have had in altering everything from assignments to educational philosophies. Add to that, the fact that at this point most teachers (except the oldest ones) have now been trained in colleges that pushed feminist memes. On top of all tha…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:10 AM
6

That's a helluva continuation of the previous comment.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:55 AM
3

That's a helluva comment.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:55 AM
2

Thank you. I also think it is excellent. It barely got any attention. Please pass on the information (the post or just the link to Cato).
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:48 AM
3

I posted a long academic report written by Stephen Baskerville a while back. It covers multiple aspects related to public policies and perceptions directed toward fathers. It's very informative and,ultimately, saddening report. For anyone interested, http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/159y4r/academic_review_the_myth_of_deadbeat_dads_2002/
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:22 AM
2

I submitted a post yesterday. It is a policy analysis on feminist jurisprudence. The post is a long read, the full linked analysis even longer. But, it describes VERY well the pressure feminists apply and how, bit by bit, law enforcment and the judicial system capitulate. Here's one quote from the analysis, followed by a link to the post (should you be interestsed): "Elaine M. Epstein, past president of the Massachusetts Bar Association, has written: 'The recent media frenzy surrounding domestic…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:11 PM
3

Shame this is not getting more upvotes. Fatherlessness is indeed the elephant in the room no one will talk about.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:16 AM
7

This is a very important issue that needs more awareness. It's among the most powerful and hurtful betrayals that can be put upon a person. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:49 AM
2

Evidence? (I don't really doubt this, but I would appreciate it). Would be nice to have. Not that catching feminists red-handed would get them to tell the truth, but evidence is good ammo for the MRM.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:06 AM
5

Top of the page, on the left side, next to the word "Article".
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:08 PM
1

Yes, and it's a circular system. Feminist pseudoscience makes it's way into law enforcement and judicial training (and into the law itself)....officers and judges are then under pressure to perform their jobs in the feminists-approved way. This is on top of the already strong white-knight tendencies in many male officers, lawyers and judges AND the presence of many feminist advocate lawyers pushing for ever more misandric changes.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:54 PM
0

Yes. The page is basically a piece of feminist propaganda pushing their bogus statistics.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:40 PM
1

I wish I could help, but it's just so exhausting trying to fix a wikipedia page. Every tiny change you try to make is going to be scrutinized to hell, and you'll just be accused of trying to politicize wikipedia at every step. Seems like it would be exhausting. Especially, since feminism has an overabundance of both funding and fanatics. We're definitely the underdogs in this. Hundreds of thousands of little totalitarian feminists are working night and day to brainwash (control the message) and …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:39 PM
2

I think a few of these people are trolls and some of them are just really brainwashed.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:27 PM
2

Yes. Feminists appear to be chipping away, trying to slowly create a system where women can't lose, no matter how much they screw up or how selfish and irresponsible they are. This is bad for children and a nightmare for men (and ultimately a nightmare for our society and women too).
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:13 PM
4

I'll pitch in when I see these posts. The only thing I'm worried about is sending you stuff that either you've already found or other people have already sent you. I don't want you to be bogged down/annoyed by the same things getting sent to you over and over.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:02 AM
37

It's "soft" bullying. Reminds me of the books "Odd Girl Out" and "Mean Girls Grown Up", except, in this case, it's specifically concerning a website's operations. It's a shame. Being disingenuous, making secret coalitions, treating a target with double standards, trying to disrupt the well-being or success of a target....and doing it all while pretending none of it is happening to tear your target down psychologically; these are all hallmarks of indirect aggression (aka relational aggression, ak…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:00 AM
2

I'm glad you said that's a good one for this kind of information. I have a copy of the book sitting on my bookshelf. Just waiting to finish the book I'm currently reading, "Fraud of Feminism" will be the next one I read. I've heard it's a good one.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:02 AM
0

Thanks, edited.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:01 AM
1

It seems the symbolism is pretty direct there for men going into family courtrooms.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:30 AM
1

Yup, pretty much agreeing with everything you said there.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:46 AM
10

I hear that. Learned helplessness or brainwashing or something. Some of those people remind me of the poor bastards we read about in news stories, wherein the wife pays someone to kill them and, when the husband finds out, he says "I don't want to press charges. I forgive her! She's a good woman." Sad people. I feel sorry for them; they value themselves so little.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:36 AM
5

This is the comment I left when I watched this: Feminists' activities here remind me of what they've done in family court. They hide behind "best interest of the child" in order to maintain and expand their real agenda, women controlling men (i.e. female supremacy over men). In France and Germany, feminists have successfully had paternity testing made illegal because they care about the best interest of the child and don't want to see families break-up. Of course, that's complete and utter bulls…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:56 AM
30

Feminists' activities here remind me of what they've done in family court. They hide behind "best interest of the child" in order to maintain and expand their real agenda, women controlling men (i.e. female supremacy over men). In France and Germany, feminists have successfully had paternity testing made illegal because they care about the best interest of the child and don't want to see families break-up. Of course, that's complete and utter bullsheite. They don't want men to have any power or …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:18 AM
2

Thank you for submitting this. If possible, please submit this to http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsLinks. It's a little nook just for studies and reviews. If you want me to do it, just tell me and I will.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:46 AM
1

He got his day in kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:11 AM
2

According to the charity, breast cancer - the most common female cancer, which has a similar death rate to prostate cancer - received more than double the annual research spend - £853 per breast cancer case diagnosed, compared to £417 for prostate cancer. In answer to the question in the title, "Hell Yes!!"
/r/MensRights01/01/13 11:49 AM
2

That's right mountaingoat. I think it's like 3 hours. Thanks for the reminder. Edit: Here it is: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/14v9x5/warren_farrell_the_myth_of_male_power_3_hour/
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:06 AM
2

Fantastic. Thanks. A cite-able source.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:59 AM
17

For people that constantly speak their doublespeak of gender "equality" and "options", feminists sure do know their Sexual Economics 101.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:33 AM
7

That too starkhalo
/r/MensRights01/01/13 06:15 AM
1

Thank you GDean.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:31 AM
5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:43 AM
43

I would also add one more: An additonal Tactic: Altering definitions This one is not included in Straus' review. But, it happens frequently. For example, say a feminist researcher defines-down rape for a study. She (or he) will then, predictably, get the results she wants (i.e. a highly inlfated number). Christina Hoff Sommers does a good job explaining how this works here: http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9502/sommers.html
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:21 AM
23

http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-seek-legislation-over-sex-bots/
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:14 AM
9

Hail to Ma99ie. Nice to see this brought up. I very much agree with you and wish there was something that could be done about it. This subreddit is infested with trolls. Some are obvious, most are more sneaky than that. They like to distract, downvote, and throw the proverbial "monkey wrench" into posts. A lot of the trolls ask kind of innocent sounding questions or make seemingly innocent statements simply to bait people. They then turn around and twist and manipulate whatever non-feminist soun…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:31 AM
3

There are ALOT of men and women from all races and ethnicities SICK of watching the government pamper certain people while they work hard and get taxed to death. And, bureaucracies become self-perpetuating systems where the people getting handouts become dependent on them AND those employed by the bureaucracy have a self-interest in perpetuating and expanding it. The government has no business picking favorites and engineering outcomes for some, leaving others out in the cold. The only people I …
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:07 AM
49

I asked one of my female friends how she would react if she went to a potential sexual partner's house and found a fleshlight. Her immediate response was laughter, and she said she would end any activities with that man and described it to be creepy, weird and not normal. That's only anecdotal, but it's certainly a tremendous double standard and just kind of cruel ("creepy", "not normal"). It is my belief that her double standard, cruel attitude is fairly common. I think part of that is a reflex…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:43 AM
8

Kate O'Bierne has discussed how some school districts make it MANDATORY to have equal representation of men and women when studying the history of fields like science and math. Damn feminists, you scary.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:23 AM
0

LOL at phony feministatistics.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:24 PM
3

Only the abstract was available, otherwise I would have looked over the study. Anyway, as far as the clothing part is concerned, these are my feelings... There will ALWAYS be a small percentage of humans (men and women) who are criminals...thieves, fraudsters, false accusers, violent people, and , yes, rapists. This is why most people don't, for example, walk around town with stacks of money in their hands or go around leaving valuables lying around. This is even more important as the potential …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:17 PM
2

I think some of this sub's subscribers have "battered activist syndrome" You have no idea how much I agree with you. I could go on and on. Stockholm Syndrome is another problem.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:46 PM
1

So ridiculous, but funny.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:07 AM
1

Thanks pecanpig, sounds pretty awesome.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:51 AM
2

What's so awesome about it Pecapnig. I'm genuinely asking.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:38 AM
2

I like using the "Curb Your Enthusiasm" response. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGjElvt4nP8
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:52 AM
13

The ease with which people are ready to destroy a man's life is terrifying. This woman's whole post was about how she betrayed her boyfriend (and she certainly did) and how she wants advice. Not only are some of those people reticent to even acknowledge she screwed up, they just want to bypass the whole post and go straight to sacrificing a male to (somehow apparently) make it all better. Scary stuff.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:47 AM
2

You submitted this twice Modron. As far as the post, sounds like she definitely assaulted him. As far as the male orgasm, I think there are a significant number of women who don't really understand it. Men don't "come early" because they are being selfish. If anything, men are paranoid about not lasting. They've seen or heard men being put down for being "minute men" or "two-pump chumps" in popular culture and in their own personal lives. They also fear women will laugh at them and/or make fun o…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:20 AM
1

I was going to read the study but it only linked to the abstract. In any case, this is how I feel about rape and clothing choice. There will ALWAYS be a small percentage of humans (men and women) who are criminals...thieves, fraudsters, false accusers, violent people, and , yes, rapists. This is why most people don't, for example, walk around town with stacks of money in their hands or go around leaving valuables lying around. This is even more important as the potential for victimization increa…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:09 AM
2

Yup, and they have billions of dollars and thousands of organizations constantly out work putting the "deliberately flawed" studies and propaganda out. They're a scary lot.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:01 AM
2

I found the original quote I was looking for. It is "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." That's the one I wanted.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:56 AM
3

This is WONDERFUL. The "under the thumb of feminists" men's studies programs currently in place on campuses are such an insult. Registered and ready to learn something. If anyone missed it, the New Male Studies website is here: http://newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:22 AM
2

Another fine video by Billy. The anti-male, absurd, one-sided, cherry-picked, exaggerated version of history feminists portray is madness.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 02:05 AM
2

The "dear colleague" thing is terrible, I agree with you. "Dear Colleague, I want your college to destroy men's lives for the sake of anti-male politics".
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:48 PM
1

Poor bastard. Oh well, at least you're not there anymore.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:46 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:44 PM
9

OP, the study is about "sexual assault", that includes a continuum of sex crimes. Not trying to give you a hard time, just pointing that out. However, the biggest problem is this "study" (which appears to be more advocacy research) was conducted using a university police force. Criteria for what constitutes "sexual assaults" on college campuses (because they are inundated with feminist politics) is notoriously low. Nowhere in the study do I see definitions for what the university laws consider s…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:19 PM
12

I couldn't agree more. VAWA is a partly a giant club for feminists to hit men over the head with and partly a piggy bank to enrich feminist "advocates". Down with VAWA.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:37 AM
1

Whole thing sounds FUBAR ellecon. It's a shame.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:33 AM
2

LOL. The one-sided anti-male propaganda isn't funny, but the way you phrased your title is. "Pack your bags men (and MRM women), there's a long road ahead of us."
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:11 AM
2

Maybe someone can help me with the exact person and quote, but someone (I think Voltaire) once said that you can tell who has power in society by who you are not allowed to talk about. Using that measure, women are clearly the powerful ones relative to men.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:02 AM
2

The only thing I would add to this article is that a significant number of women graduating from college (probably at least 5%) either had a baby while in college or were planning on staying home and having one after college. I suspect the feminists advocacy researchers at AAUW included them. http://washingtonexaminer.com/bogus-aauw-study-perpetuates-wage-gap-myths/article/2512127#.UOAKo2_AeiM
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:36 AM
3

Well done seal_raider.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:06 AM
2

I tossed this bone their way: (Study) "Women's Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and Biological Considerations" http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul1352218.pdf
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:58 AM
13

Alright hotshot. I'm just happy this party has formed. That was my point.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:19 AM
3

champions find ways to win even in bad situations That's just shaming language. If you acknowledge unfair treatment you're not a "champion". I've lost competition due to bad calls by the refs By your standard, I could say this statement by you is "highly suspect" and "incredibly biased" even though you are just telling me about some things that have occurred in your life. But, why would I? What do I have to gain? Why wouldn't I give you the benefit of the doubt? Why try to take a crap on you for…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:18 AM
4

muttmonster, if you want to say something come out and say it. Are you saying the OP is wrong even though the OP was there? The OP said he (or she, not sure) saw what happened and is reporting on it. You did not see anything and are just saying the OP is wrong. Nothing wrong with that if that's what you want to do. I do think, however, you would look more respectable if you would just come out and say what it is you want to say.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:05 AM
8

No good male deed goes unpunished and almost no female cry (regardless of its merit or lack thereof) goes unanswered.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:51 AM
0

Being treated unfairly because the ref "likes" or "feels sorry" for your opponent is not whining nor a conspiracy, it's simply being treated unfairly and acknowledging it.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:48 AM
0

Feminists have successfully had laws passed in some countries making it illegal for a father to get DNA testing to make sure "the child" is "his child". http://www.ibdna.com/regions/UK/EN/?page=paternity-testing-ban-upheld-in-france The cruelness and totalitarian instincts feminists have to go out of their way soooooo much for the cause of female supremacy are quite extraordinary.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:33 AM
2

I agree with this post. If I'm drinking with a girl on a Friday night and she convinces me that we should go rob a convenience store, if I go and rob the store with her I will be held accountable. Saying "boo-hoo, it was her idea, she pressured me into it" won't mean a thing (and it shouldn't).
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:03 AM
15

Thank you oneiorosgrip. I have not read it all yet but I certainly will. I noticed you reference Erin Pizzey in there. I love that chick. I skimmed over "The emotional terrorist and the violence-prone" about a decade ago. But, I've currently got it in my Amazon shopping cart and will be ordering it (and reading it more carefully soon). She's a gem. I wish I had some live-giving elixir to maker her live an extra 50 years. Poor women's been through hell with the feminists and all she ever wanted t…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:46 AM
4

You're missing the point Sadiebb. By holding drunk drivers accountable, the law (and our culture) are saying "You CHOSE to drink and you had the PRESENCE OF MIND to VOLUNTARILY DECIDE to engage in drunk driving. No one here is suggesting a man or woman passed out from drinking (or given roofies) or physically forced to have sex was not raped. The discussion is about a man or woman VOLUNTARILY CHOOSING to engage in drinking, CHOOSING to have sex, then regretting it and calling it rape. That's reg…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:24 AM
1

I very much agree with you. Warren Farrell discusses this at length in "Myth of Male Power" (highly recommend the book). This "woman as child" in an age of "equality" at the expense of men has got to stop.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:37 AM
-11

not wanting to have sex was not communicated in any way other than in her own head then it wasn't rape I agree with you. Unless someone is knocked out or involuntarily drugged (or a child), then, as an adult, they must be expected to say no (both in word and with matching body language). As Warren Farrell said, the courtship dance between men and women has been going on for millenia, ""men-pursue/persist, women-attract/resist". He goes on to say that an accusation of rape based on how we define …
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:34 AM
3

There are (at least) two issues going on here. First, it is a problem when the definition of rape is downgraded too far. I'm not here to argue about each specific idea of what constitutes rape. But, when it is downgraded too far for political purposes that's not good for society in general. The second problem, bigger issue for men's rights, involves public perception, law enforcement, and the judicial system. In other words, regardless of how far watered down (or not watered down) the definition…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:09 AM
28

I'm proud of these men and women who are part of this effort. It takes a lot of guts to do what they are doing.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:39 AM
1

That doesn't seem fair or responsible on the teacher's part..
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:54 AM
0

Because I used broad, unscientific terms. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:34 AM
1

How are you "sure"?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:27 AM
6

This is going in my personal library. Thank you VERY much for submitting. It is another example of hard evidence of institutionalized misandry.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:09 AM
5

That's terrible about your father.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:07 PM
7

Men can just as easily be the victim in abusive relationship cycles ellecon, I can't count the number of times I've heard stories of a man whose wife maimed, attempted to murder, or hired someone else to murder him taking her back and, in some cases, apologizing to her! Feminists talk all the time about women being victims, feeling powerless, having a low self-image, etc... There's some truth to it, though feminists certainly exaggerate by quite a lot. But, truly, I think men suffer far more fro…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:08 AM
5

Men objectify women ALOT on their looks. Women objectify men moderately on their looks, moderately on their protective abilities (e.g. height) and ALOT on their ability to generate money. If we're being honest, women objectify men significantly more than men objectify women.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:23 AM
1

Thanks for clarifying for me.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:16 AM
1

It's a tiny bit ambiguous what you're saying, DavidByron. Are you saying there's something lacking or wrong with the study OR that men tend to me more negatively judged in general?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 03:33 AM
3

Here here. I think you and rightsbot are onto something.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:00 AM
1

EXACTLY. Most women are not feminists but, understandably (to an extent) since most women are not directly adversely affected (and sometimes even get free goodies) by what feminists do, they don't say much. In addition, most men treat women better than they treat themselves and other men or, at the very least, have little in-group bias or desire to organize with fellow men. But, if we put women to the same standards as feminist policies put men, things would be very different. Women would start …
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:23 PM
5

Because feminism is a female supremacist movement (female and male feminists). Also, men, as a group, are HORRIBLE at standing up for themselves and nearly always cave into women. Most people who have been around men's rights are quite aware of this. Those who stand up for men's rights openly (be they male or female) are in for a lot of stress and ridicule, not only from women but sometimes even more so, from men.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:47 AM
3

I agree. As a rule, that's true. The exceptions only prove the rule.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:51 PM
49

The challenge is greatest for high-achieving women in their 30s looking for equally successful men. To parody the corny (inaccurate) phrase feminists say to men ("your privilege is showing"), I say to this, "Your hypergamy is showing". Funny I find the article a bit on the misandry side. Me too. We were told we were special I would add to that "and victims and entitled, and that men are not special and are evil"
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:58 AM
2

Thanks for that video. It was nice to see this situation displayed graphically.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 01:22 AM
1

Of course not.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:44 PM
4

Godspeed (or Darwinspeed, if you prefer) ruleofthebrave. Need more people like you in the academy.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:08 PM
2

I'm with you on the artificial womb. Not to mention, that's equality. It would be the equivalent of females using a sperm bank.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:29 AM
1

If I were rich I'd probably just get some attorney to set me up with a surrogate mother from some foreign country. I know that's not an option for most guys (just spit-ballin myself). I know different states have laws about co-habitation and "common-law" marriage. In other words, a man say, "But, I never married her" and the state says, "You lived together for "X" years, you're married her in our eyes". Honestly, I don't have solutions. I'm with you though. I'd love to find out more. Sorry I can…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:08 AM
6

Good post. The word needs to get out on this nonsense. This is a part of how the larger culture impresses upon people that men have original sin simply for being born male. It's hateful and harmful behavior
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:45 AM
1

Sent you a PM via the method I described above.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:08 AM
6

This is how feminists work. Negative thing about women = deny biology. Negative thing about men = invoke biology. Here's a bunch of information below. Hope it helps. Here's some information about violence: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15ezn4/men_are_portrayed_as_the_perpetrators_of_domestic/ Here's some information on the so-called wage gap: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/150f6p/women_careers…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:06 AM
2

Do you know how the private messaging system works on Reddit? The only thing I know to do is click on someone's screen name and then click on "send message" below their karma numbers. I tried send someone a message this way before and he said he never got it. I don't know how it works. I'm asking you because I was thinking of sending you my ideas (about the post).
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:02 AM
4

oneiorosgrip, thank you for the very thoughtful response. I do believe that the incentivizing of father exclusion and the devaluing of fathers are significant to this "achilles heel". The family law system (as you mentioned) is a big part of the problem (e.g. secretive family courts with almost no accountability, 'twisting' of policies to meet feminists demands, an out of control child support bureacracy): http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/159y4r/academic_review_the_myth_of_deadbeat_da…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 04:29 AM
6

You are absolutely right on the one-sidedness of it. By letting women keep their advantages--fields they predominate (teaching, nursing, veterinary medicine, psychology) and far more frequent option of working part time or not working at all due to financial support from a spouse or partner--while also giving them entitlements and quotas to populate male predominate areas, we are basically making them even more superior citizens than the already are and, likewise, making men even more second cla…
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:56 AM
2

It would be really hard to try to argue with you about that even if I wanted to (and I don't want to, I think your points are legitimate). Like I said, "On the one hand, men are completely smart and justified to be completely untrusting toward women because women aren't just women, they wield the power of the culture and the government as well." The situation for men is FUBAR.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:18 AM
5

It's sad things come to this. I think it's normal for these types of situations to bring up very strong emotions....including feelings of anger and betrayal. The problem is the completely divergent ways society approaches the issue, depending on gender. As a culture, we keep an eye on men and discourage them for acting out on their feelings of anger and betrayal (social norms, one-sided anti violence education, one-sided domestic violence policies, unrealistically negative portrayal of men in me…
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:04 AM
10

Damnnnnnnn!!!! Lady, you got intellectually knocked the fark out!!!
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:44 AM
13

Thanks for all your efforts. If, in the future, you should decide to get re-involved, maybe you could do it a little differently. Do it part time. Don't try to convince people who are totally brainwashed or misandric. Be careful about getting ganged up on. It's exhausting getting swarmed from all sides by vicious people. I know it's going to happen if you stand up for men's rights, but try to reduce how many times you are in that circumstance. Finally, try to see yourself differently. I feel goo…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:48 AM
-2

This woman's behavior was despicable but completely unsurprising.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:37 AM
1

if you question whether she should have murdered her husband, you're asked, "how many times have you beat your wife today?" Yup, that's exactly the kind of vicious (seemingly Saul Alinsky inspired) personal attacking to shame and silence that is so common when someone stands up for men.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 05:27 AM
4

Just doing what I can to think like a feminist and turn reality on its head.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 01:21 AM
6

Thanks for pointing this out andreipmbcn. I've hear of the New Left before and know a little bit about it. But,t his "Critique of Pure Tolerance" gives me a specific document to study. I like maintaining a basic knowledge of the people that have influenced feminists thinking (Gramsci, Rosseau, Marx, de Beauvoir, Friedan, etc..).
/r/MensRights24/12/12 01:15 AM
2

If anything I've said can help you develop some kind of posts discussing the billions wasted and the complete undermining of men, feel free. Or, maybe I will in the future. In any case, I do agree with you that this perspective needs more attention.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 11:56 PM
1

I must say you've got some truth there. Personally, I don't fantasize or "get off" on submission fantasies (but, of course, even I like feeling desired) but there are quite a few men who get into the female partner (paid or unpaid) as dominatrix. And, in the gay community, there are a lot of men who are happy bottoms and don't care much one way or the other about being a top.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 11:07 PM
10

George Orwell, call home! Speaking of which, did you know that Elliot was really oppressing E.T. when he helped him and got him back to his ship. Why did he give E.T. unhealthy Reese's Pieces? Was her trying to destroy E.T.'s health and body? Why did E.T. have to ride in the basket? Elliot must have assumed he could treat him poorly and use E.T.'s body in any way he saw fit. Oh, the humanity!
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:56 PM
4

Their complete lack of any sense of fair play and audacity is something to behold indeed.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:52 PM
1

It seems to have been this way with feminism from the beginning. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony were hardcore racists. Margaret Mead was a hardcore racist and eugenicist. Keep putting the truth out there Imnotmrabut.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:51 PM
5

Thank you. I could have also added the one-sided family law system to the equation. Basically, at every step of the way (single in a relationship or in a marriage), the government (under pressure from feminists) has set things up so that women have no reason (outside of their own senses of honor and fairness) to show men any respect or to even be reasonable or cooperative with men. Of course, men still are in reality needed. They have to keep paying taxes to fund all this. They have to enforce a…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:41 PM
13

You've got it Xuxien. This is the feminist age of Orwell doublespeak...up is down, left is right, etc...
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:31 PM
2

I guess to me it shows the amazing sense of entitlement and just how spoiled these middle (many upper or upper-middle) class women were. Even more, it shows how much society indulges them to be that way. I was reading a study the other day about punishments in criminal courts. But, basically, what they tried to do was measure punishments black males, white males, and white females get for the same crimes....all else being equal (they filtered out several factors including differing criminal hist…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:46 PM
4

I'll just bring up a couple of things, unrelated to the most obvious thing (the billions taxpayers are paying for these women). First, this situation is a nightmare for the children. They are being raised in a way which (absent father) that has been shown (in male children for sure, not sure about female children) to be most associated with delinquency and mental health issues. On top of that, they are only being raised with the feminine point of view. The normal complementing of the feminine wi…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:35 PM
2

I haven't read the book "Myth of Male Power" in like a decade. I decided to reread it a couple days ago. Right in the first chapter he talks about middle class White females jumping and and stealing the attention just as Blacks were getting recognition for the ACTUAL oppression they suffered (slavery, lynchings, Jim Crow laws)........okay, just went and snagged the book. Farrell sums it up in his usual understated way, "By understanding that what we did to blacks was immoral, we were willing to …
/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:15 PM
5

Ever notice that the way feminists talk about sexuality is very similar to women's pornography, with themes of dominance, violence, bondage, etc.. (e.g. books such as "50 Shades of Grey"). I think they get off on this shit. Maybe what they really hate is themselves for having desires and fantasies that diverge so greatly from the way feminists taught them they are "supposed" to think. Maybe they are projecting that self-hate on men, the easy scapegoat. The heroines in "50 Shades of Grey" and "T…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:26 AM
6

Not sure why you got downvoted. I admire your passion. Being angry about these things is an appropriate, healthy response.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:02 AM
2

Please read what I wrote carefully Buscat. I did not say that most girls like to do what your one ex girlfriend did. I said most like to feel powerful and sexy by getting men frustrated. This can be in or out of the bedroom, with boyfriends or with men who are only coworkers or strangers, to do with sex or not to do with sex.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:00 AM
2

I think most women get off on how frustrated they can get men, how much they can toy with them (not saying every one of them is cruel and manipulative about it). It makes them feel powerful and desirable. There are different ways to do it. Token resistance to sex is one of them.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:35 AM
59

This is our society. This is the misandry, male disposability, extreme unfairness, all excused under color of words like "equality" and "justice". Society has always chomped men up and spit them out. In some ways it was necessary. Somebody had to protect the tribe. Somebody had to do the difficult but necessary things. Still, men were accorded at least some minimum level of respect by women and children. Now, things are different. They have gotten more extreme. Males are abused and disposed of m…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:52 AM
2

It's a good one Pecanpig. Hope you find it and enjoy it.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:37 AM
1

Yup. That is a normal thing on this subreddit. Lots of MRM trolls and concern trolls. I think an honest discussion is most refreshing.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 05:11 AM
1

That's what I call a nice comeback line.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:59 AM
1

If I were a man or woman who has been violently, forcibly raped, I would be pissed at how feminists are manipulating and trivializing the word for political and ideological purposes.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:41 AM
1

want to have there cake and eat it to I completely agree with you. In fairness to women, wanting one's cake and eating it too (or an inclination to selfishness) is a HUMAN instinct common among both sexes. The difference, however, is that we completely indulge this instinct with women. We do not indulge this instinct with men.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:23 PM
2

but no to taking responsibility for it ding-ding-ding "tell shrodingerstherapist what he's won Johnny"
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:19 PM
2

I certainly agree with you. And, even beyond that, I've noticed a trend in academia. If any studies come out that can even mildly or tangentially be considered to reflect poorly in some way on some women, there's always a bunch of groveling and disclaimers. It's like, "Here, we studied this and I'm sorry for what we found and all, but please don't come after me with the feminist mafia and destroy my career." No such groveling exist when males are portrayed in a less than stellar light (or even w…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:58 PM
2

Nancy Hopkins and the subsequent 50+ million a groveling Harvard shelled out was my inspiration: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/213961/who-stole-harvard/christina-hoff-sommers#
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:03 AM
6

I declare! Where's the fainting couch. We need 55 million dollars dedicated to creating new quota surveillance programs for women in economics immediately! These misogynists are work-shaming!
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:08 PM
1

Okay. I've seen lots of folks who do that on purpose (trolling). Lot of weasels like that on Reddit and the internet in general. They do that to with "innocent" sounding questions just to distract and annoy. As for the other ones that genuinely believe they are doing a service, pretty annoying. I don't think most men want to deal with all the being shamed for being male stuff in the real world only to come here, a men's rights subreddit, and have some subreddit schoolmarm badgering them. Thank y…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:15 AM
0

Thanks b01100110. Do you know what "concern trolling" is?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:43 AM
3

I think Emily just got back from watching the "Vagina Monologues"
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:40 AM
4

I second that emotion.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:37 AM
2

I've seen a lot of good material getting downvoted almost as soon as it comes out. I've also seen some, though not necessarily terrible, very lightweight posts with hundreds of net upvotes. I figure that I don't really understand how things work on Reddit but feel the same sense of "something doesn't seem right" that you do.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:30 AM
1

ConservativeSpin, please tell me what do "vote brigading" and "concern trolling" mean?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:27 AM
3

That's a hilarious "Onion Talks". I was thinking about submitting it myself.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:24 AM
4

Trying to play the divide and conquer game. First, of many, many men are angry. It is a righteous, justified anger to being put down and treated like second class citizens. Second, we are all types of men including: Asian men, White men, Black Men, Hispanic Men, Gay men, Straight men, Transgender men, Republic men, Democrat men, Libertarian men, and on and on and on. And much to feminists chagrin, some of the people fighting against misandry are Wo-men.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:21 AM
4

Feminism...come for the shrieking...stay for the hate.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:15 AM
1

Good post. If anyone is curious about what female on male vaginal-penile rape is called, it's "rape by envelopment" (I've seen it called "rape by engulment" too).
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:12 AM
3

It doesn’t matter how often you say this, or you point it out. You tell a lie long enough, Goebbels said, you can brainwash the entire community. And that’s what’s happened here. Erin Pizzey is a gem. I think the mainstream domestic violence discussion is one of the great pieces of evidence of just how much feminists (and a general femnized perspective) controls the narrative related to the sexes. There is sooooooo much research showing that women are just as guilty as men of domestic violence y…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:10 AM
4

Glad you posted this. It was very interesting. I think alot of men in general are like you in that they are questioning their drives, their purpose, social roles, how the culture is trying to mold them, and so forth.... A celibate monk is certainly a MGTOW in terms of not being a pussy beggar, that's for sure. Take care misterdoctorproff.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:03 AM
4

Maybe this website will be helpful to you (I hope). It has some information and then it also has some links at the bottom of the page. http://www.dadsdivorce.com/ Groups like this one have been pushing for father's rights a long time. And, they have a 'contact us' and 'get help' links. http://ncfm.org/ I'd like to help more, but it would be the blind leading the blind if I started trying to talk about this too much.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:53 AM
11

Any man who attempts to claim they understand what a woman goes through is ridiculed and belittled because they could never understand what a woman goes through. That's your nail on the head remark. The problem is women are completely dominating the narrative. As Christina Hoff-Sommers has remarked, there are thousands of organizations, big and small, for females only. There are almost none at all (and certainly almost none, or none, with big government or major foundation-funded bankrolls) for …
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:48 AM
4

There's no doubt in my mind that, on average, women are having far more sex. But, as someone else in here said about extremes, a few men are having the most sex and many men are having none. I've personally known several men that had anywhere from 3-6 active "lady friends" going at any one time. It is a good question though. Hisotorically (as in all of history, before birth control pills), I've read that over twice as many women left descendants than did men.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:42 AM
3

Certainly sounds like misandry and an agenda. It also seems like a shit test. See if you are the "troublemaking" kind of guy that will speak up when anti-male propaganda is propagated. This kind of thing is getting more frequent. I've heard several stories. The last one I heard was some "on camera" question they forced all graduating Mississippi State University engineering students to answer about whether or not they were comfortable with a female boss. Of course, no such question was asked to …
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:38 AM
6

Social researcher Hugh Mackay predicts that men who haven't signed up to the ''gender revolution'' of the past 40 years and still have the attitude of ''Why can't blokes be in charge?'' will be infuriated by it. But younger men and men influenced by their relationships with women are likely to be impressed, Mackay believes. Rebecca Huntley is a director of Ipsos, which undertakes qualitative social research. She also did her PhD on the gender gap in the 1983 and 1993 elections. In focus groups '…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:31 AM
1

How bizarre. Feminists are, apparently, real big into George Orwell and Saul Alinsky. Next, they'll attempt to paint suicide as primarily a female problem.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:03 PM
1

I've read stories in the past (I wish I would have saved them) about guys that felt sorry for women and let them come stay (e.g. "You can stay at my house a few weeks till you get on your feet") with them, only to, soon thereafter, be tossed out while said hobo girls took over their properties.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:34 AM
2

That's terrible. My first real exposure to men's rights was the old Glenn Sacks web site. I remember how appalled (to the point my brain hurt) I was when I found out how the star chamber, oppressive restraining orders worked.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:32 AM
1

LOL.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:28 AM
1

Yes, the Superbowl lie is a feminist classic. And, just as the Superbowl lie was being challenged in a meaningful way, advocates started a new one about the World Cup. The discussion starts at 2:42 of this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmfCB_IVkOc
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:47 PM
0

You don't see the point. It's true.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:40 PM
3

Definitely this type of coverage is only baby steps. Being into men's rights means experiencing a lot of disappointments so I say bathe in every ray of sunshine we get.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:03 PM
1

Yeah, some of them are quite vicious. Here's a video that relates to the creepy people you're talking about: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw-Pvo2UINc
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:27 PM
3

It sure is.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:27 AM
-2

I'm sure you'll get over it, sweet pea.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:36 AM
1

No they don't. They don't debate. They smear, imply, and obfuscate.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:32 AM
1

If they choose to answer at all (besides just shaming and suspicion), they will give me the "public relations" version of feminists' sources. That is worse than useless. It's misleading.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:26 AM
1

I don't understand your reply wardog77. When you are saying "the opposite point" are you talking about the opposite point to what I was saying or to what Chauncey DeVega said?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:21 AM
7

The "Peter Pan" crap is just another shaming technique. God forbid men actually give a crap about themselves and be realistic about misandry, a double standards, a one-sided family law system. Not to mention men don't have all these quotas, special programs, and special grants and scholarships set up for them. Hell, you could be a huge screw up as a female and still wind up being a professional. Crap out a kid to some random guy when you're young and then the government (and child support) takes…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:42 AM
1

The SPLC has been suffering from a poverty of integrity for a while now. Like the ACLU, they've completely lost the, at least, little bit of balance they once had between useful action and ridiculousness.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:33 AM
2

I love Camille. I don't agree with everything she says, but she says some really brilliant things. She is very bright and, most of all, straightforward. She says more smart, insightful things in an hour than the average feminists says in six months.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:31 AM
1

I agree with this whole thing. As far as ever getting rid of crazy aggressive acts, as you touched on, aggression is a part of the human condition. Males are the pros at overt aggression (physical intimidation, throwing blows, etc..). Women are the masters of covert aggression (e.g. building secret alliances against others, spreading rumors, deception). In short, male aggression destroys from the outside-in, female aggression destroys from the inside-out. People also need to put things in perspe…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:28 AM
1

Good ol' misandry....never hard to find.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:09 AM
-1

Everything "behind the mask" I've ever seen (webiste confessions eg. ExperienceProject), heard (from my own personal life), or read ("Odd Girl Out", "The Emotional Terrorist and the Violence prone", "That Bitch", "Mean Girls Grown Up", "Little White Lies", countless articles) all points to women being some scary, wicked little creatures (if you are a gal that is "not like that" I"m not talking about you). What makes them REALLY scary to me as a man is how sneaky they are and how good they are at…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:09 AM
2

Pretty predictable stuff. I think most men's rights people knew this would be exploited to attack masculinity and, indeed, white heterosexual men in particular have been first and foremost in the target sights of feminists for decades. Feminists want control and power and they figure taking white males balls is the best way to get it. Once feminists neuter heterosexual white males, gay and minority males will be more expendable. Alot of gay and minority men have figured this out already, some ha…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:51 AM
2

An absent father is the number one predictor of male delinquency. You are absolutely right; this is the giant elephant in the room that will not be discussed in the feminized, misandric culture and media.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:37 AM
2

"Men are human beings" Alernatively, "Men are human beings, not just human doings"
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:32 AM
1

A big part of men's rights is unbrainwashing men from the propaganda they've had put in their heads (I include myself, of course, in this). Thanks for the post. While I don't have any solid data on the prevalence of female serial killers, here's a huge series of articles about female serial killers throughout history. It goes on and on if you click "older posts" at the bottom of the page. http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/search/label/Female%20Serial%20Killers
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:28 AM
1

Nothing more the femistasi likes than manipulating language to suit their needs.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:24 AM
7

The judicial system and all its appendages (social workers, psychologists, etc..) are full of misandrists. Kellett is just one of these little cancers, but I'll take what good news I can get.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:22 AM
5

This is a very good video robert32907. The biggest predictor of male delinquency is father absence. That giant elephant in the room rarely gets talked about in our feminized culture, however.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:20 AM
-2

If you have no assistance to offer, why say anything? I'm not playing games or being deceptive. Just seeking to share information with other people. There are plenty of very bright people on this subreddit. Some with a lot of knowledge about what I seek. They may never see my post or choose not to respond, but it does not hurt to ask. If you are suggesting (not saying you are, but if you are) that I ask on something like the feminism subreddit, I can only say to you "are you serious?". If they c…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:16 AM
5

Women are better than men..........as long as things are rigged.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:31 AM
2

I did not know that. Hmmm...glad you decided to take a look at this post. I'm learning things.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:20 AM
1

Yikes. I did not know that either. I'm not surprised, but I didn't know that.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:59 AM
1

oneiorosgrip, thanks very much for your input. I've heard (and read quotes) of French and De Beauvior but have not read their material. I'm sure it will be enlightening (in a disturbing kind of way). I never knew NOW publicly supported Solanas after the shooting. It's rather appalling but certainly not surprising. I know Sanger was a hardcore racist and eugenicist. You are right. It's not easy to find out about. The website I'm linking here has some quite stunning quotes form Sanger: http://blac…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:25 AM
1

I think your scenario is very realistic.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:25 PM
2

Yup. I think that combined with greed (there's billions of dollars up for grabs for aggrieved feminists) are key reasons for all this misandry.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:22 PM
1

It most certainly is. These manipulations of terms and statistics are one of the chief ways feminists indoctrinate the public and obfuscate the truth. One small example is the infamous "1 in 4" statistic that was pushed for over a decade and became "conventional wisdom" among much of the public. It was complete bullsheite. The definition of rape was watered down to fit the agenda. Most of the women the advocacy feminist researcher claimed were raped actually protested that no such thing had happ…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:21 PM
2

Not sure what part of this you are not getting. It says penetration by a sex organ of another person. Only males have the sex organ to penetrate. Women's sex organ "envelopes". Again, this lets women off the hook.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:47 AM
3

No, it very clears says "penetration..of". It is very clear. It lets women off the hook. Vaginas don't penetrate, they "envelop".
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:30 AM
5

Good going cknight18. The little things add up. His future comments will likely be adjusted to be more fair toward males.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:34 AM
1

I don't have a ready source, but I've read a couple times before that it's also harder, on average, to get the women that are ordered to pay support to actually do so. If I come across the data on this again in the future I will post it. If someone reading this has that data available, please let me know.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:31 AM
1

I intend to continue facing this adversity with nobility, love and acceptance. Congratulations on being able to hold your head up through all the abuse. Female chauvinists might win in the short run but they create males like you (aware, interested in what's right, against misandry) in the long run.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:26 AM
5

Oh Feminists! Is there no end to how manipulative you will be? They are completely shameless. I must say, however, they have a lot of chutzpah. They've been doing this sort of stuff for years to try to conceal their true agenda--female supremacy. They switched the name of "women's studies" to "gender studies" on a lot of campuses. They've included "men's studies" programs. But, all of it, falls under the auspices of feminists. It's feminist theory by a different name. They are using the "keep yo…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:15 AM
7

Wow. That is freaking awesome. No, it wasn't enough and no it should never have happened in the first place. But, the fact that they even did this means the men and women standing up for males had an effect. This is good stuff. Most of being a men's rights person is disappointments, people shaming you and putting you down, etc.. I'll take a bit of good news when I can get it.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:06 AM
0

I also knew this event would quickly be turned into an anti-male thing and, in some sectors, more so a specially anti-white-male thing. It's my understanding that Jabba-The-Michael-Moore has also jumped in on his usual anti-male traitorous behavior.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:01 AM
4

That's pretty creepy. I won't completely condemn that girl, just call it bad judgement. Your point, however, is very valid. Anything like that with the sexes reversed would be a damn hand grenade of shaming, including possibly a call to authorities.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:58 AM
3

I don't know of one handy source for each state. I do know that some discussion came up on men's rights websites when the FBI revised their organization's definition of rape. FBI Defintion: "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." (http://www.good.is/posts/the-fbi-expands-its-definition-of-rape-will-we-take-it-seriously-now/) The change in definition was good f…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:51 AM
5

i also think that feminists dont like mar groups because feminists are sexist and bigoted and do not care about discrimination against men Bingo. guess what feminists did? thats right, they protested, because they didnt like the idea of male domestic violence having equal rights. Color me unsurprised. isnt it extremely sexist to deride MRAs for even existing, and then turn around and do the things they do? You betcha!
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:26 AM
1

Calling me a dirtbag, Jabba the Hut, and all sorts of shit. They made me this way and then wanted to fuck with me over it. I saw a couple what the Marines called "administrative separations" when I was in the bothered me. Guys that were just a few pounds over their max weight, but who did well on the physical fitness test and were basically excellent Marines. I know before I got out that Marine Corps had changed it's policy to give more lenience (I think it was on body fat) to guys that performe…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:14 AM
2

Thank you. It is not an unreasonable question. It is certainly blunt and maybe even a little bit rude. The point (as you mentioned) is how these things played out based on the sexes of the persons involved.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:50 AM
0

I reject your extremist thinking and putting words in my mouth,regardless of what you feel you will do "to the death".
/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:22 AM
1

Haha...yeah..I remember skaters too now that you mention it. LOL at "lance cpl underground"....haven't heard that in years (since I've been out).
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:22 AM
1

Like I said, buddy. You're going to do your thing. I'm going to try to show a little loyalty. That will be my thing I do.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 12:13 AM
4

Yup, we called the guys and gals like that "shitbirds" or "the 10%".
/r/MensRights17/12/12 12:12 AM
4

This is why we fail. Whether it's a military campaign or a hockey brawl, if one side is unified and the other is not, it's over for the non-unified side. You, of course, are going to do as you please. However, I suggest you not consider what I said in an extreme way. It's not "zero loyalty" or "beehive loyalty". I would say that the temperature of the MRM is cool (possibly lukewarm) right now concerning loyalty. I'd like to see it medium to medium-high.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 12:02 AM
2

Pitiful. If we men ever get our heads out of our rear ends and start getting some loyalty to each other and some of that in-group bias that women have, females are in big trouble. All the stuff happens because men LET IT HAPPEN. The typical response is we don't say anything OR we act like brainwashed white knights. I'm pretty sure you would agree that any man trying that late/latte/hiding out business would be dealt with very quickly.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:42 PM
1

My experiences and observations have been similar to yours. I LOL'd at the riding a horse story.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:39 PM
5

10 years in the Marines here. I agree with you that it is painful to be real blunt because there are a handful of squared-away, honorable women and you hate to lump them in with the other ones. But, my experience was that MOST did less and complained and manipulated more.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:36 PM
1

Shouldn't Eryemil stop breaking your balls? Since we are in a mens rights subreddit, shouldn't we always error on the side of supporting men and supporting each other? Shouldn't we avoid nitpicking each other or trying to shame each other over little things? Shouldn't we get some damn team loyalty?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:32 PM
6

I don't think the actual researchers or most academic feminists really believe it. I say this because it simply cannot be a coincidence (I know you already know this, just thinking out loud) that all their studies have terminologies and methodologies that slant (a little or alot) in an anti-male, pro-female direction. I do, however, believe that most of these women believe and, more importantly for them, "feel", that men owe them some sort of comsic debt and, therefore, any ends justify the mean…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:25 PM
3

Love Bill'iam.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:22 PM
3

The equation won't solve itself because you feel victimized. LOL.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:20 PM
1

Barbara WaWa has always come across to me as fake and shady. A great book about these type of media women (Walters, Couric, Diane Sawyer, etc...) is "Spin Sisters" by Myrna Blyth.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:42 AM
1

3...2....1
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:36 PM
1

This video was the first time I've seen school officials be so nonchalant just with the attitude, "Yup, we are your kid's co-parent. We'll instill in them what we want, whether you like it or not." I find it highly disturbing and anger-inducing. It especially makes me angry that they target kids. Bad enough if some company tries to brainwash its employees. These schools are using parents' tax dollars to undermine those very same parents and brainwash their kids. BTW: Do you know what a Kintergar…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:53 PM
0

I'm a straightforward person. If you have something to say in a straightforward way, say it. If not, I won't try to read your mind.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:06 AM
0

Your questions are so dumb they don't even make sense. You sure are one for trying to label others while simultaneously being hypersensitive about labeling. You don't know me, you jerk.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:56 AM
1

mil·i·tant [mil-i-tuh nt] Show IPA adjective 1. vigorously active and aggressive, especially in support of a cause: militant reformers. Furthermore, you were selective in your quoting. What he says, regarding this indoctrination education, is "there's a strong militant homosexual influence; I don't mean just generally gay people." Get over yourself. And, by the way, it doesn't work out real well to refer to other people as "you people" while trying to be self-righteously politically correct.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:50 AM
0

These sneaky, totalitarian bastarrds must be exposed. The worst part is these control freaks do all this under the color of langauge like "equality" and "no hate". They are shameless, despciable, mentally/emotionally damaged people.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:02 AM
3

My pleasure.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:17 AM
1

No matter how much blatant misandry there is, feminists (and many everyday women AND men for that matter) still deny, deny, deny there is a problem.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:35 PM
3

ALOT of good information here.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:27 PM
6

That's feminist equality alright.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:59 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsZYPv9QWX0&list=FLUEkV2DyJTE1Oqb1VauDimg&index=10
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:27 PM
2

I've seen a lot of changes too, everything toward increased feminization and gynocentrism. Some of it, as you mentioned, just seems like an utter disdain for men being able to do their own thing without female supervision.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:25 PM
3

I can hear the libertarian feminists now, "women have different 'ways of knowing' personal liberty"
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:23 PM
1

Yes indeedy.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:21 PM
1

Becoming more centrist? That would be a good thing.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:19 PM
7

I agree that the support for men was tepid at best. But, given that it is NPR, I must say I find even that tepid support an encouraging sign...like a crack addict for the first time admitting that maybe, just possibly, she has a problem.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:05 AM
3

Envelope is a vagina. Letter is a penis. Envelope forces itself on letter.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:29 AM
2

If the Universities become Gulags with speech code, the US strength will wither away. One of the ironies is that the little commies and ideologues at public universities want to run their own little private gulag systems and ignore the laws of the land when it comes to policing university culture, but want to be part of the good ol' U.S. when it comes to taxpayer money.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:28 AM
3

Erections are physiological responses. Men get erections from erotic dreams. They get erections from having to urinate. Morning wood is also quite normal. Also, not sure how many men know this, if you come upon an accident and the man has an erection it suggests a possible broken back.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:24 AM
3

Well, this is obvious doggy doo. Problem is the amount of time it would spend me to thoroughly research each of these stats. I will mention a little bit about what is usually wrong when stats like these are thrown out. First, there is a problem with the emotionally manipulative "every __ minutes ___ happens". We live in a country of over 300 million people. Alot of strange or rare things are bound to happen in those ___ minutes because there are so many people. We need perspective. Second, and t…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:22 AM
3

16.7% of college faculty agree that it's "safe to hold unpopular positions on campus. Wow. The totalitarianism and political policing on college campuses is despicable. Men's rights is one of the set of ideas routinely and rigorously policed on campuses. It's even worse because almost all colleges market themselves as free marketplaces of ideas. I'm a fan of F.I.R.E. Glad you submitted this.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:38 AM
9

Okay. This is the second NPR thing I've seen in the last week that went directly against feminist dogma. I'm getting a little freaked out right now. Terrific. Unexpect, but terrific.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:26 AM
4

Love the graphic for the video. Now that there's resources to be extracted they want to muscle in on the deal. Genius. Also, great comments about the unthinking, automaticity of white knights.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:19 AM
2

Feminist "theory" influences the way billions of dollars are spent and affects all aspects of our culture. I submitted this because sometimes the point that feminism is a house built on sand gets lost or forgotten.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:17 AM
1

The word parasite certainly comes to mind.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:54 PM
2

Yes. It's terrible and it's completely a double standard.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:52 PM
1

Well, that's certainly not a golden rule. Let's call it their tin rule.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:50 PM
2

Yes. I'm pretty tough. But, not bulletproof.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:35 PM
1

MY cousin is having a 3rd baby in 4 years with a 3rd nameless man And there are thousands of your cousins out there. We do need to crackdown.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:34 PM
7

I think that's absolutely true. I also believe it's true that women, in general, are not selfless at all (with the frequent exception of their immediate blood kin) and WITHOUT A DOUBT least of all for men.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:37 AM
4

First of all, rape is a rare crime. Also, we know that women rape too. But, for the sake of argument, let's say, of those who commit this rare crime, men do it significantly more frequently than women. As the OP said, feminists implying all men are somehow collectively guilty is pretty offensive. So, again, for the sake of argument, let's put make a list of some other unethical human behavior that women are guilty of significantly more frequently than men and ponder how women would react to said…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:34 AM
1

More retarded propaganda comparing apples and oranges. Here's some factual information: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12760790/ns/business-forbes_com/t/are-women-earning-more-men/#.UMhaYoPAfP8
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:20 AM
8

There was little support for feminist theory regarding sexual coercion. Results showed that the relative status of women at each site predicted significant differences in levels of sexual victimization for men, in that the greater the status of women, the higher the level of forced sex against men. But, wait! Stop! Remember, if women ruled everything the world would be only smiles and gumdrops, hugs, unicorns, peace and cotton candy. This simply cannot be. :)
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:09 AM
7

Is this the human sex that complains about objectification all the time?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:58 AM
3

Wow. What a load of sheite. Look how the article starts out: With tears in her eyes, Shelley Kraft reluctantly put her frail hands behind her back Oh, dear. Where's the kleenex? I need to go watch 3 hours of the Lifetime channel now. And, WTF is up with that ridiculously short sentence? Complete and utter bullsheite. A man would be in jail 20 years minimum for this.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:57 AM
6

Our culture is defined by anti-male, female-immunity double standards.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:51 AM
1

False rape allegations are some of the most horrendous crimes there are. They speak to a larger issue about women. Many women have no sense of justice. You upset them or they perceive you disrespected them, they go straight for the nuclear weapons. For example, I know of a friend's son (newly married, new baby) that worked with two very lazy females and found it very frustrating. He was promoted. He then decided they should be held to account and work like everyone else. He wasn't "going after t…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:50 AM
2

neither mother probably belongs in prison. Yes they do, sorry to burst your bubble lady. And, what are the TRUE issues here for society here? Well, for one, daddy government giving women cash incentives to bring up children they cannot support. The article said, "Kematch has had five children" and "Redhead has had four children." Take away the government teat and women that are not stable and have no means to support children will stop having so many. It will encourage them to clean themselves u…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:37 AM
6

This is very relevant to men's rights. Thanks for submitting AnnArchist. Anyone who is experienced in men's rights issues knows how gynocentric our educational system is and how misandry is ignored, tolerated, or even encouraged (depending on the specific people, specific school, etc..). I've seen several related stories of male children being victimized by bullying teachers in the past couple years.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:16 AM
4

It should NEVER be allowable as a defense, UNLESS I can claim "cortisol" or "testosterone (or whatever) made me beat the crap out of feminists because they stressed me out (or whatever other male hormonal defense you can conjure up). Pure bullsheite.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:08 AM
10

I think you have an excellent point, actually. Let's just assume, for argument's sake, what she said is 100% true and Brent is a piece of crap (not that she lied or Brent was out of it--e.g. concussion-- or whatever), what was stopping her from making an effort? What about the other woman there?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:03 AM
1

This is not at all surprising. Hypergamy is very obvious. Yet, this and any other evidence will denied by feminists, blank slaters, post-modernists, and evolutionary biology and sociobiology deniers ad infinitum.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:56 AM
2

I'm so angry. He sounds so privileged. :)
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:54 AM
1

Beautiful video. Very motivating.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:53 AM
2

According to alot of people and on a lot of issues (not just this one), avoiding women's feelings being hurt or women having even minor inconveniences should override even basic rights of men. I, of course, am offended by that sort of misandry and disagree with it completely.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:56 AM
2

They most certainly should be. People cry equality but often it's just self-serving posturing. Women have 100% maternity guarantee. Things are only "equal" if men have the same guarantee. Therefore, mandatory paternity testing.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:53 AM
1

Yes indeedy.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:51 AM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:50 AM
5

Yeah. Feministy types have been playing up the "peaceful, matriarchal, example for human society" bonobo stuff for years. It may be a bit of a non issue. I know Steven Pinker in his "Better Angels..." books says the evidence points to our being much more likely to have a common ancestor with chimps than with bonobos. In any case, here are a couple articles. The "New Yorker" article is quite long so I am putting a couple quotations below the links. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:55 AM
1

I hear you. You've got a lot of other things to take up your time besides collecting sources for every thing you hear.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:07 AM
2

Thanks for your comment. I'm a bit surprised that the rather feminized NPR had this discussion. That's good though. Good on NPR for that one.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:42 AM
2

Here's an article on it from the newspaper "Atlanta Journal-Consitution" http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local/court-knew-man-jailed-for-a-year-for-non-support-w/nQHxY/
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:20 AM
1

I bet that woman talks about patriarchy in her sleep, quite the pod person.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:09 AM
1

Glad you wrote that. I couldn't figure out how to word it. You worded it well. It gives them power to shame men and demand special entitlements, etc... I think, in the last 30-40 years, at least a trillion dollars has been spent on and an untold number of special favors have been given to women based on faulty notions originating from a faux-history (or, "herstory").
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:05 AM
2

Wow. There was almost a man on the moon before they could vote.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:00 AM
0

You bet it is.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:58 AM
3

Poor, sad, pathetic Uncle Fester.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:25 AM
2

thanks for your 1 cent.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:19 AM
0

really really?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:18 AM
1

D----TO----THE----BAG.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:18 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:43 PM
0

Exactly.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:29 PM
0

Can you think of a comment?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:20 PM
-1

If you don't see, you don't want to or are oblivious.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:55 PM
-2

Kiss my hind end tool.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:52 PM
2

No man should have to pay to keep his child in his lifestyle UNLESS he has control over his own children (i.e. custody and makes all the decisions about their lives). If a man CHOOSES to do more than this, that's his business. Child support should be enough to support a child, that's it. These greedy, scheming whores are disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:46 PM
-1

You have it backwards.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:39 PM
0

Hmmmm...okay.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:09 PM
1

Yes, indeedy. All can be described as "advocacy research".
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:09 PM
-3

You are a troll. And a dishonest douche.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:15 PM
0

You are a troll, despite your playing dumb.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:15 PM
0

He is a troll, you're seeming is unseemly.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:14 PM
-6

Play dumb all you want. You know EXACTLY what you are doing. You go around trying to make a mockery out of the men's rights subreddit. Trying to cast doubt on people and impugn them. All the while, you yourself are useless and lazy. I don't like you. Is that clear enough?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:15 PM
-3

Yes you really are. You are a lazy manipulative scumbag. Most people here really care about men's rights. You go around trash talking and trying to plant seeds of doubt, all the way being useless and lazy yourself.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:13 PM
-1

binarypillbug is a men's rights troll. FYI.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:10 PM
0

binarypillbug is a men's rights troll. FYI.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:10 PM
-5

binarypillbug is a men's rights troll. FYI.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:06 PM
2

binarypillbug is a men's rights troll. FYI.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:04 PM
1

binarypillbug is a men's rights troll. FYI.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:04 PM
-6

What an idiotic question. You are a troll. I've seen you around before. Are you so aloof and dense that you think you can go into a men's rights subreddit and question the VERY basic notion that feminists have changed government, including family law? Really???
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:58 PM
8

Obama, Feminists and the Stimulus Bill http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp A Little General Info on Obama and Biden: http://thenononsenseman.com/article/2009/08/02/obamas-misandry-cineplex-marc-h-rudov/ Here's a little bittty bit on VAWA: http://www.saveservices.org/2012/02/wanted-an-honest-discussion-about-the-violence-against-women-act/
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:44 PM
2

I know what you are talking about and tried to find a story but could not fine something exactly like what you are asking about. But, like I said, I do know what you are talking about. It works like this: 1) Mother falsely says some guy is the father (perhaps she does so right at the birth of a child or perhaps she waits a few weeks). 2) Child support agency takes her word from it and starts trying to collect. 3) Man freaked out. By the time the man (sometimes the accused men who have never even…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:14 PM
2

I like this subreddit. I sift through lots of things I'm not interested in. It's not that difficult. Just bypass it. There is a subreddit specifically for academic-related men's submissions: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsLinks There is also one for activism related links: http://www.reddit.com/r/MRActivism/ I've, personally, never tried to make or moderate a subreddit. Is it difficult? In other words, could you go with some of your philosophical counterparts and go make your own subreddit?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:26 AM
3

LOL.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:21 AM
3

That heartless feminist scumbag writer can go straight to Hades. Forget the "mancession" or the "he-covery." Men suffered the biggest job losses in the financial crisis, and also gained the most post-recession jobs. Yes, indeed sweetheart. You would like us to forget anything that put paint men in a sympathetic light. But now, men and women have equal footing in the recovery. As of November, both genders have gained back half the jobs they lost in the financial crisis, Yes, and then this idiot w…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:19 AM
1

For now, however, I would like to ask any gay males who have experienced misandry personally, or seen/felt the pressures of society imposed on them at the expense of their male identity to please share their stories. If any homosexual here has an experience to share regarding feminism or feminists, I'm interested as well. I'd like to make a suggestion and that is to be more cautious with your titles. I'm not gay. I thought you wanted some general feedback about the phenomenon. But, per the part …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:08 AM
0

I enjoyed the post.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:04 AM
0

Great graphic. I would like to briefly discuss one matter mentioned on that graphic, that is that "Women Prefer Men Who Are Already in Relationships". This tends to get little attention, even among men's rights people. Certainly, women's (feminists especially) efforts in affecting the family law system (exorbitant child support, alimony, etc..) is discussed and is indicative of just how much men are business decisions for women, walking wallets and servants. But, so does this business of women p…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:04 AM
2

This is a good video. I lol'd at "the vaginally-endowed". I like how he talks about the psychological manipulation and mischaracterization of men. I would add that, as a rule, women and men simply use words differently. It's important for men to understand this. For instance, the word "friend". Just look at adolescent girls. They go through "friends" like boys go through socks. But, each time they have a new "friend" (before one stabs the other in the back), they are talking it up as if they are…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:55 AM
16

It is normal for men in power to get there and stay there by putting women above men. But, Obama and Biden take the cake. They are extraordinary in their back-stabbing of fellow men and their kowtowing to women. For anyone who doesn't know, Biden was the driving force behind the most gigantic piece of anti-male, female-entitlement legislation every passed, the straight-from-Orwell named "Violence Against Women Act", or VAWA. Obama has been kissing feminists arse since he was on the campaign trai…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:35 AM
3

That is a very good video. It's good as education for folks new to men's rights and a good refresher for those of us that have been exploring the subject for years. Feminists do indeed go after the language. They want to "control the message" and control perception. As always, they are hypocritical. They only push for "gender-inclusive" language when they want to take credit away from men or stop people from sympathizing with men. When it comes to negative labels used against men, feminists are …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:30 AM
6

■ Situation A man asked a female student on her way home from school ‘Which way is the station?’ What a sad state we are at indeed? It's so innocuous and random. I can't even imagine the level of propaganda some of these girls are exposed to at school. Feminists (and their ideological bed buddies) are such totalitarian pigs. Next headline: "Man Seen Eating Bagel At Bus Stop!"...more at 10.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:18 AM
2

If you are not familiar with the term, I recommend you read up on "advocacy research". Also, with all these kinds of groups, here the "Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children", they have two goals, money and pushing their ideology. These goals propagate each other. More money equals greater ability to push their propaganda, more propaganda equals being manipulative to justify their existence equals more funding. There is also, often, a lot of politics involved. Polit…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:14 AM
3

Why not inbjudningsbreven [sic] the world's universities to emphasize that as many women as men should be proposed to the prize, writes academics, writers and others who want to see a change? Feministy types are always in a big circle jerk. Referring back and forth to each other (ideological counterparts), all the while trying to make it look like they're gathering random, impartial opinions.. They love to use logical errors, such as vague appeals to authority or appeals to popularity. The probl…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:58 AM
1

I don't really pay attention to robot idiots...guess they are good for an occasional laugh though.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:47 AM
2

LOL. I've always thought of SRS as a great champion of free speech. :)
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:46 AM
0

I....DO....NOT....CARE.....WHAT.....FEMINISTS....THINK.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:26 AM
1

Okay. Nothing wrong with your opinion either.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:25 AM
1

You must be a fan of Andrea Dworkin.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:30 AM
-1

Hmmm...people look soooooo intelligent when they type...hmmm.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:28 AM
0

LOL.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:25 AM
1

I don't wonder anything. I wonder if you're a troll.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:24 AM
1

The war thing makes a lot of sense to me. I'd like to see what else we can come up with too. My feeling is that war was part of it but that other factors, especially wealth and property, came into it. Also, the interplay between dominant and minority groups and whatever other factors. I hope we can put together really solid sources. I despise ms-information.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:17 AM
0

That's an appeal to authority there. But, in fairness, I don't think there's anything wrong with you saying "doctors say" but I want you to know my brain doesn't turn off when you say that. For one thing, you have to understand the politics behind male circumcision. SOME doctors, activists say it is good for women in that it lowers their disease risk. So, for people like feminists, that's kind of all they need to know. If hurting men is "good for women", so be it. Also, there are religious polit…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:12 AM
1

Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:49 AM
1

Too bad it's inactive.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:49 AM
1

That's a good suggestion. Thanks.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:48 AM
0

This comment of yours suggest you are not a person to be taken seriously. The issue of "circumcision" goes well beyond this small survey. Please, think before you type.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:48 AM
1

I tried to look it up, did some very amateur research. First off, "paddy wagon" seems to be called such in relation to the Irish (St. Patrick, the name Patrick, "Paddy" for short). I saw something about it being derogatory, as in "pick up those Irish scum in the paddy wagon". But, since, historically, Irish Americans have been very represented on police forces in the northeast U.S., maybe it's more of a reference to the wagon being the property of the Irish officers, the "paddys". I'm not sure. …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:46 AM
0

Everywhere, regarding feminists.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:35 AM
1

Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 02:38 PM
1

I'm sorry Pecapnig, I don't.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 02:21 PM
6

I don't know how to get in touch with him. Didn't notice any contact links. I know he's on here too. Fairly new to Reddit and don't know how to find people on here either.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:55 PM
5

"Don't want to get a job? Have trouble getting along with others? Love abusing men and making them miserable? Feel self-righteous? Become a professional aggrieved feminist! There's billions of dollars available for crapping on men and promoting female supremacy. Don't miss out on your $$$$."
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:58 AM
3

This is an excellent submission. For me personally, it has been obvious for a long time that what we have been told about depression is not true. The number of men who are alcoholics and the number of men who blow their owns heads points to A LOT of depressed males. Nevertheless, as discussed in the video, we live in a culture that focuses on women. Sometimes, to the extreme, with a straight up "women are good and oppressed; men are bad and privileged" mentality. Getting the word out on this typ…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:33 AM
6

She turned on her hubby and the state gave her the "pussy pass" (for those whose feelings get hurt really easily, "anti-male gender disparity"). I wish I could say I found this the least bit surprising or shocking. As far as their detainee, that's awful. Hope she is able to bounce back from this abuse.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:23 AM
3

Psycho broad. I did get a sideways kick out of one part. The "paddy wagon" part. It made me think of Mel Gibson in signs when he cringes at himself for being so out-of-date he used the term paddy wagon.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:19 AM
0

Gillard is the Australian Hilary Clinton. She is a misandrist; she's manipulative. She's just a bad person.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:14 AM
11

This may be an usually publicized and flamboyant case, but it is a small example of a larger reality I frequently talk about. Our organizations and, more generally, culture is feminized. Most of the men that are able to achieve and maintain a high status in government, churches, police forces, the judiciary, schools, etc... are men who put women above other men. An author ("What Men Know That Women Don't", Rich Zubaty, has what I consider to be a good name for them, "manholes".
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:06 AM
73

STOP SLICING UP LITTLE MALE BABIES!!! If they grow up and CHOOSE to have the procedure, then I'm all for respecting their decision.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:57 AM
1

it's a giant scam, a big contradiction. Whatever they say is just a way to gain more power. And there you have it the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 02:10 AM
1

It is so sad that I get your point on the video. Men have to go to such extremes in an attempt to not be mistreated or judged unfairly. Let them throw the first punch, but don't take it, hit back. Whether this means real fists or words, doesn't matter. With you on that, too.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:09 AM
2

I agree with everything you said. I've given these kinds of things some thought and I think the movement for men needs a combination approach. But, yes, right now we are too much on the wimpy, intellectualizing side. I submitted my thoughts on it. Maybe if you get a chance you can take a look and give me feedback: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/14cpkd/we_need_more_moxie_in_the_mens_rights_movement/
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:58 PM
2

So why do we continue to pile on the goodies for the ladies while the males languish ? Burns me up too. And, it also burns me up that no matter if it's medicine or any other area, no matter how much better women are doing than men, they (most anyway, certainly feminists) are always screaming and pounding for more, more, more MORE!
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:17 PM
3

This is true. In fact (I don't have the studies at my fingertips), I have read that women actually make more when doing that actual same job, same number of hours, etc...
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:15 PM
5

Controlling 85% of all spending while representing 51% of the population. Not bad for a horribly oppressed LOL. Yup, where do I get me some of them gold chains of oppression.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:13 PM
4

Regardless of the outcome, you would certainly be in the right. It's oft said that we have a "legal" system, not a "justice" system. Nowhere is that more evident than in situations involving female misbehavior.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:12 PM
1

Yup. Sure is. Feminist Ms-information is allowed to infiltrate and infect everything. It's crazy. I've often said that it's not the small number of people that are publicly self-identifying feminists that are the cause of this gynocentric culture. It's the millions of women (and many men) that passively support and secretly root for them. There's no other way the ridiculous feminists lies could be such popular memes.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:10 PM
3

Yes, and the numbers about the spending they control is mind-boggling. I know these things are generally true from personal observation of friends' wives. But, to see the numbers laid bare really shows the dominance.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:05 PM
2

Yes, especially in our culture where attaining the status of "victim" is a ticket to all kinds of special treatment.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:03 PM
6

Great thing you did. I think your idea about the train was good too. I thought about something like that, like taking the guy off to the side and getting in front of him. That way if the girl hits you she has just escalated it and now has two victims....harder for witnesses, police, and a judge to discount.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:03 PM
11

Thank you. I'm experienced with mens' rights discussion but even I didn't know just how in charge they already are (and they keep pushing for more, more, more).
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:01 AM
17

According to this women's website, "Women control about $19 trillion of wealth, including earned and inherited assets, which accounts for more than three-quarters of our nationʼs financial resources." http://womensvoicesforchange.org/financial-knowledge-empowerment.htm According to this article for marketers, "51% of U.S. Private wealth is controlled by women...Women account for over 50% of all stock ownership in the U.S....Women control more than 60% of all personal wealth in the U.S....Women ac…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:48 AM
1

Erasmus, I just was surfing and got their stupid little images out of my head and you had to go and remind me....darn it. :) You're right, though. They are whackos.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:19 AM
22

Female caught misbehaving and goes into victim mode. In other news, dogs like steak.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:18 AM
7

I think he has a bit of a point. However, there are MANY ways of being aggressive. Women EXCEL at indirect aggression, destroying people via gossip, coalition building, false accusations, verbal abuse, emotional abuse, manipulative use of sexual allure, ostracizing, lies, etc... Also, being a victim itself, especially in this contemporary culture of ours, can give people a great deal of power. Being a victim: 1) Frees you from personal responsibility for your actions or problems. 2) Gives you th…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:16 AM
10

I really, really, really, really, really, really, really can't stand the type of people that act like the ones in the video (the ones taking down the posters). So arrogant, so defaming to others, and so self-righteous. Makes me feel like hulking out. Thank goodness Erin Pizzey was in the video. She calms me down; she's great. Her comments about the ideological and financial motivations behind domestic violence ms-information are spot-on.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:08 AM
3

Think you have to realize, feministy hyper-sensitivity and a lust for control is entrenched into our culture. There are billions and billions of dollars spent by government, NGO's, foundations, universities, etc.. yearly to promote female power. There are literally thousands of women (and men among them) who are paid to try to control everything so that "women are great, men are not so great" is always pushed on the populace. On top of that, there are millions of 'volunteers' that support what t…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:01 AM
2

"A lot of women complain.." zzzzzzzzzz "But don't feminists do it to men too?" Lying about, shaming, and being abusive to men is as natural to them as eating.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:56 AM
37

Wow. No one steps in. Reverse the sexes and there would be a bum rush of dudes, with females possibly joining in (certainly yelling for his head in the background at the least). Sometimes I wish I was born a thousand years ago. I have no desire to hit anyone, but if someone's being abusive to me I want to be able to handle myself, instead of spending my time worrying about gynocentric cultural norms and a gynocentric law enforcement and judicial system.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:50 AM
5

You are absolutely right. Their propaganda fails under scrutiny, but, the problem is that it is not scrutinized. It just keeps getting repeated and repeated in the media, academia, and elsewhere. That's a tough nut to crack. So many factors and forces involved: politics, female psychology, male psychology, habituation, entrenched interests, media, etc..
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:38 AM
2

These might not be exactly what you want but they are quite good: Academic Paper on Social Workers' Anti-Male Attitudes related to child custody: http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/13xbui/other_study_listening_to_fathers_mens_experience/ Historical Information demolishing the notion that domestic violence was "okay": http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/10/societys-acceptance-of-domestic.html Academic Paper on the Denial Of Symmetry in Domestic Violence: http://pubpages.unh.edu…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:37 AM
5

"WTF, no pussy pass" is so unnecessary. There is no need to insult an entire gender to make an argument Disclaimer: I'm the submitter but not the one speaking on the video. What you said is wrong. The man's wording is crass, but his comment is about a legal system which allows women to escape justice routinely and treats men more harshly, also routinely. So, anti-male "gender disparity" is the flowery way of putting it. "Pussy Pass" is a non-flowery way. Here's a little sample of the literature …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:22 AM
26

THE 1987 NIH inventory did indeed find that only 13.5 percent of the NIH research budget was devoted to studying diseases unique to women. But 80 percent of the budget went into research for the benefit of both sexes...The remaining 6.5 percent of NIH research funds were devoted to afflictions unique to men. Oddly, the women's 13.5 percent has been cited as evidence of neglect. The much smaller men's share of the budget is rarely mentioned in these references. Feminist propaganda and pseudo-fact…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:46 AM
5

What a HUGE sense of entitlement, and how selfish. Sooooooooo angry at not getting her way completely, even though she has much more than most people and is a very lucky person.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:47 AM
2

This gave me a combination of outrage and head-numbness. Just inexcusable.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:28 AM
0

This is pure insanity, just plain stupid, and pure misandry (e.g. woman is insulting to you and you, as a man, are afraid to even stand up for yourself due to her god-like legal advantages over you). I found the article. It is here: http://mobilepaper.timesofindia.com/mobile.aspx?article=yes&pageid=3&sectid=edid=&edlabel=TOIA&mydateHid=02-12-2012&pubname=Times+of+India+-+Ahmedabad&edname=&articleid=Ar00304&publabel=TOI
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:15 AM
1

Fark feminists. That's my teasing of the data.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:07 PM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:00 PM
-1

Just mind your business to begin with next time and no one waste anyone's time.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:51 AM
-2

If you are into men's rights, you must know that you will be called names, be gossiped about, have people use shaming language against you, etc.. ALL THE TIME. It's the way it is. I understand the point of what you're saying. I really do. The notion of not shooting oneself in the foot or "living the stereotype". I did not mind at all that you disagreed with me or were "disturbed" by me. It was the part where you told me where my place was. If you are sincerely interested in men's rights, my atti…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:40 AM
2

I agree with you and Hoff-Sommers. As a rule, I'm a big fan of Evo Bio and sociobiology.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:35 AM
0

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:32 AM
1

Let me first preface this by saying that I'm here because I'm interested in men's rights. That's the only reason I'm here. In my personal life, I'd go have a coffee with anyone sincerely interested in men's rights, even if he or she currently self-identified as a feminist, progressive, socialist, whatever. Having said that, on with the comment. Straight white males who do not act obedient are the primary targets of feminists. They are also easy scapegoats for identity politic ideological types t…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:31 AM
2

About Half of Rape Allegations are False, Research Shows http://www.mediaradar.org/research_on_false_rape_allegations.php
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:02 AM
1

Your title made an implication. Why don't you explain yourself then I will elaborate on any questions you may have.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:59 AM
2

That is a good piece. The Dear Colleague letter is another power play by totalitarian feminists.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:58 AM
1

I do believe you are the one trolling. Please note the name of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:56 AM
1

You are indeed a neurotic introvert. Being "offended" does not mean getting your way. That's completely one-sided.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:56 AM
1

If her blows were as big as her sense of entitlement she'd be John Henry.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:52 AM
1

Thanks. This is a good submission and there is indeed a double standard.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:42 AM
1

What's wrong with advocating for white rights?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:35 AM
1

I give exactly zero farks.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:33 AM
-2

I don't care what you think. Sorry. I read stuff on the internet that ranges anywhere from mild disagreement to upsetting. So does everyone else. Get over yourself. P.S. Please don't play the "he's promoting random violence" cared. I clearly said it was 1) fantasy and 2) only about "justified" (e.g. self-defense) violence. No reasonable person would argue that using violence to keep from being wounded via burning (or other similar means) is wrong.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:32 AM
3

Way to go on this one Smitty. The best part is the female tried to placate him so she could then jab him with a follow up "but...", however, she got cut off. LMAO.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:26 AM
2

Is being an "Uncle Tom" contradictory to furthering the dignity of black people?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:18 AM
1

Hell yes. Paternity testing is a must. No worse betrayal can be put upon a man than to be duped into raising a kid that's not his.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:11 AM
1

I"m actanonverba8, and I approve of this message.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:09 AM
1

Great, great submission. Thanks. Nice to see this getting some publicity.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:07 AM
4

This will not be enforced fairly. Domestic violence laws, in fact, are already rigged (e.g. "primary aggressor" policies, which have nothing to do with the actual primary aggressor). If this law were enforced fairly, a new prison would have to be built each month to handle the torrent of female inmates. These "indirect aggression" games are women's expertise. If anyone would like to read up more, I can recommend three books: "That Bitch!" by Mary Cleary and Roy Sheppard "Odd Girl Out" by Rachel …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:49 AM
1

Your sister is an arsehole like mine is. Self-righteous feministy jackass. I say, all and all, the main thing you need to know is that to be someone who speaks out about men's rights is to be someone abused. It's the way it is, point blank. It is the norm to be ridiculed, gossiped about, having shaming language used against us, have people make false accusations against us, have people build coalitions against us, have people go after our careers, have people go after our reputations. Maybe not …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:42 AM
2

The worst part didn't come until the end of the assembly, however. The teacher asked that the men (or, boys I suppose) in the audience stand up, place a hand on their heart and the other in the air, and make an oath never to commit violence against women. This angered me to a degree like nothing else...I recall likening the scenario to requiring the Muslim students in the school to make an oath on Sept. 11 not to commit acts of terror. Certainly requiring that of the muslim students would be hor…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:19 AM
8

Paul Elam has inspired many, many men and women over the years. They're afraid of him. But, Paul certainly is having the last laugh regardless of the censorship efforts. The cat is already out of the bag. Paul, Glenn Sacks, Warren Farrell, Erin Pizzey, Christina Hoff Sommers and many others have been putting out the facts for years. The more fascist and totalitarian the opponents of men's rights get, the more recruits we get.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:13 AM
-4

The photos are god-awful. Poor, poor young man. I fantasize about unruly females putting me in a position where I can justifiably unload on them. No real point in sharing that here. But, I do.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:03 AM
16

Hunter College psychologist Virginia Valian, a strong proponent of Swedish-style re-genderization, wrote in the book Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women, "We do not accept biology as destiny ... We vaccinate, we inoculate, we medicate... I propose we adopt the same attitude toward biological sex differences." Valian is absolutely right that we do not have to accept biology as destiny. But the analogy is ludicrous: We vaccinate, inoculate, and medicate children against disease. Is being a gende…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:26 AM
4

He remarks about a slight conflict of interest between his libertarian tendencies and the Chinese government's move here. I think he need not feel that way. There is no conflict of interest.  Letting a man keep a house he previously bought is "hands-off governing". Forcing a man to give his property to an unreliable ex is intrusive government. The Chinese government is actually pulling back from a previously more intrusive position (regardless of the government's motives). Also, it is soooooo…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:02 AM
1

Indeed, the cola is disgusting. Had some when I visited Maine once. Reminds me of cough syrup.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:42 AM
1

"I guess my point is that it is possible to have moxy and be a progressive, and that progressives threaten benevolent sexism, whereas the more traditionalist MRAs still seem to want to serve women. But I get your point that no movement gets anywhere by being meek." I think you make an excellent point and I certainly did paint "progressive" with a broad brush. I did it because that is one of the main houses in which feminists live. But, I respect and appreciate what you said. Like I said, I'm dow…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:41 AM
1

Quite excellent video. I do have one remark about the final "Sexist" category. He states that the problem is not women; it is feminism. Later, he states that "we live in a culture where the sexism against men is tolerated". It is my view that the number of active, publicly self-identifying feminists is actually small. But, the number of women who discreetly approve of misandry and feminism is very large and THAT (along with the males he describes) is why "sexism against men is tolerated. Lettin…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:39 AM
15

Feminists, vicious, controlling maniacs since...forever.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:37 AM
1

It's very interesting how angry, abusive, and controlling they get when the man shows independence with resources. If this is staged, then I take that back. However, I don't think it is. Either that or these are some great actresses.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:36 AM
14

I liked that quite alot. It's always refreshing to see fathers (and men in generally) depicted well. My father is truly my family's unsung hero. My mother is heaped with praise (which she deserves) but my dad is often overlooked. Agree with you about the tear to the eye thing.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:33 AM
-1

LOL.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:24 AM
2

More sneaky ways women take men to the cleaners.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:24 AM
1

The important work of "progressives/Marxists/feminsts International"
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:23 AM
-3

Then don't take it seriously and fark off. No one invited you.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:20 AM
1

Pure misandry and female entitlement. Sorry you are dealing with this unfair nightmare. What a POS she is.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:18 AM
1

Yippee ki-yay, motherfarker! It's a step in the right direction. Enjoy the slam you POS.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:16 AM
8

Change it to: "All or Mostly Men Working, Sometimes A Woman or Two is Involved, Usually Just Holding The Sign"
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:48 AM
1

I'll take a double standard and a 32 oz gynocracy.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:31 AM
6

Yup. And that's something that alot of folks even among men's rights types don't get. They think they can intellectualize their way out of the culture of misandry. That is only part of it. You have to also have some bite. People in general are unlikely to change from naughty things if they are habituated, largely anonymous and getting what they want. You have to make them feel some kind of consequence. In a word, what you are talking about (and I agree with it) is "enabling".
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:29 AM
0

I see him like Steve Harvey, an opportunist gladly willing to stab fellow men in the back and play white knight to improve his own wealth or status.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:24 AM
4

This is one of her best videos. Wow. The hypocrisy and double standards are extreme.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:49 PM
-7

I recommend anyone to read "The Manipulated Man" by Esther Vilar for discussion of what being raised by women means to the brainwashing of the males of the species.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:39 PM
2

This sheite makes me so angry I can't put it into words. Why do these female supremacists even have university jobs (much less influence policy) in a society that at least pretends to a little bit care about freedom and fairness. This is just saying, "Do whatever the fark you want if you have breasts. There will never be any accounting for any of your actions. It's university sanctioned." Turns any though of fairness or due process on it's head.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:36 PM
1

Good to hear.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:31 PM
1

Sick. Give the child to the father immediately. Put the mother and whoever else acted like a POS in prison. After the mother gets out of prison, make her pay child support and deny her any custody.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:30 PM
3

Trying to control the market, like a bunch of thugs. That way people are forced to consider their sub-standard products (themselves) instead of being given options. Dealing with emotional abuse, verbal abuse, giving gifts, paying for meals, dealing with nagging, suffering banal conversation, child support, alimony, and on and on. Men are paying one way or another. Open prostitution is, pretty much, the only time our culture is honest about sex-related interactions between the sexes.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:28 PM
1

If I had my way, there would be separate all-female infantry divisions in the military. They would be the first to fight as well. My rationale is as follows: Feminism has never been about equality, which entails women taking on the same hardships and suffering. So, now, men still have to endure all the samecrap as ever PLUS NOW get constantly put down and discriminated against in this gynocracy. That's why I take the position I take. I hate the scam. I see anything negative or difficult, my ins…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:21 PM
1

Basically, yes. I was thinking about the political reality as well.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:18 PM
2

This is absolutely the biggest deal to any man that is interested in fatherhood. Try to paint feel good language over it or use some postmodern B.S. argument, but it is what it is. Women have 100% certainty of parentage. Men do not. It is the biggest deal in the world to men. Same goes in the animal kingdom for animals in which the male spends a lot time and effort raising his offspring. No greater betrayal of man by a woman then to betray him this way.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:17 PM
9

What a great story to submit. There is endless emotional and abstract debate about the sexes. But, this is the real world. Men went with what was right based on the evidence, women went with in-group bias. I would like to a bit of a personal thought. I wonder if these women would have behaved the same had there been no men around. I'm not saying they would have found him not guilty. I'm saying they may have at least been more open minded. In biology, they have something they call "mobbing". For …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:14 PM
2

That is not a practical solution (meaning, I don't think it's practically possible to make happen). But, you certainly have a point. People that can't think straight ought not be deciding the fates of others.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:58 PM
3

In fairness to them, they only need one man for the Burning Man ritual.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:52 PM
14

She starts out, "Men's solidarity is welcome, but..." then proceeds with her nonsense. To sum up what she actually means, "Men's solidarity is welcome, but when I say 'solidarity' I really mean obedience. We must never allow the impression that men are our equals."
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:49 PM
1

Good to see you've moved on.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:55 PM
1

I'm all about punishment and any false accusation is awful and should, without exception, be punished. I think we more/less see eye to eye. I'm not the best wordsmith so sometimes what I write is not clear.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:55 PM
1

Thanks. I'm with you on this.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:53 PM
2

The whole reason women (especially feminists) mention it is to say it's discrimination. So, stick with your math technicalities. I know how it's used in the real world. So, there is no wage gap.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:52 PM
4

First off, sorry you had to deal with that abuse. But, I don't think she's "complicated". People in general, but especially women, use that word as code for poor behavior and poor character. More accurate descriptors are "sense of entitlement", solipsistic, sneaky, liar, etc...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:13 AM
1

"If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration" said hypocritical, responsibility-shirking Judge Mark "White-Knight" Kouris.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:05 AM
0

LOL.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:04 AM
0

There is no wage gap AND "The Atlantic" has been feminist-friendly territory for a couple decades now.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:02 AM
2

Hoff-Sommers is a diamond in the rough. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:58 AM
1

I relate to you. I dig it. I think you can take some comfort by looking at it a little differently. Just like it's hard to see through foggy glasses, it's hard to think through endless bits of information and memes being pushed on you by other people, media, schools, etc... These thinks are distracting, a kind of interference. But, just like your eyes are still there under the foggy glasses, the real you has always been there under the interference. So, in that sense, it's just a matter of clear…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:56 AM
1

Good point. "Alleged" is almost never used when the accused is male and the accuser is female.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:47 AM
-1

I think you have a legitimate point, Bukkake_Monster. Feminists (and Marx-inspired ideologues in general) define things down so much it's hard it's hard to know how serious something was or was not. They do this because they want to inflate stats that support their ideologies and help stoke fear from which they, of course, will be the ones to save us. People can criticize you and down vote you all day but, in their hearts, they know that, if the details were not included, they would have no idea…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:46 AM
4

I think all false accusers should get harsh punishment. But, there are mitigating factors for me: 1) The quicker the woman recants, the better. 2) The more the recantation had to do with a change of character toward the positive side (e.g. feeling guilty) and the less it had to do with outside pressure, the better. In other words, to what degree did she confess because she wanted to and to what extent because she felt she had to. It appears this woman only let the charade go on two to three week…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:41 AM
4

Good write up and all, but it don't seem complicated to me. More "please women and punish or ignore men" misandry that defines our culture.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:32 AM
2

Misandrists can't let men be painted in ANY sympathetic light EVER.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:29 AM
3

To (sort of) Obama's credit, this is the norm for men in power in our culture. Look at preachers, politicians, police chiefs, school principals. You name it. They get there and stay there by putting women above men. On the other hand, Obama and Biden really kinda take the cake. Biden, the original hand behind VAWA, has been a traitor to fellow males for a long, long time. Obama also goes above and beyond when it comes stabbing fellow men in the back. I'm glad the article mention him using father…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:23 AM
1

I think "bro" got associated with masculine men. I'm not saying some of the people that go around saying it are not d-bags. What I am saying, is that most of them are not. But, many of them are the types of guys most would call masculine (not effete or mangina acting). So, I think the term got associated with masculine (not strictly male, as we all know men that act feminine or kowtow to women are much more accepted and politically correct) and in a misandristic, feminized culture like ours masc…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:15 AM
4

She wants it both ways. I'm not saying your wife is evil. Just that she does. Selfishness is normal for humans and she is right that there will be backlash if you speak up. It's just a personal thing you have to consider given your particular situation. From a men's rights perspective, speaking up for men and their rights is a must. From the perspective of you as a man, you want to try to compromise but not to the extent that you cannot express yourself and people are walking all over you. From …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:09 AM
12

Pretty much anything dealing with making lame excuses when you fark up. It just doesn't work for guys. Women are (for the most part) simply never held to account or given taps on the wrist. Men get crucified for similar offenses.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:00 AM
5

Look at any time or place in history and study it enough and you will always find out that the average woman had it better than the average man. You have to compare apples with apples, not upper class men and working class women.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:55 AM
3

The hoops people will go through to point the spotlight everywhere BUT on misandry and anti-male double standards are endless.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:53 AM
4

Darn right this needs more publicity. This is worse than a soap opera. Institutionalized cultural misandry, money, class, nepotism, opportunitsts, betrayal, victim playing. That poor kid, with a serious potentially brain damaging medical condition worsened by all this stress to boot. My God (or Darwin, take your pick), this is intense. Thanks for submitting this.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:50 AM
3

Keep up the heat, keep up the heat. I can't blame an ideologue for thinking she can get away with anything in the gynocracy we're living in but there are some awesome people standing up to this misandry.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:11 AM
1

Twilight Zone, Kafka, Orwell, Stalin, Misandry.....all good descriptions.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:03 AM
0

Kimmel has been an eager traitor mangina for years and years.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:00 AM
1

Feminism is a female supremacy movement. That is all.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:59 AM
1

Men should get just as much rights here as the broads. We'll see how it evolves in practice.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:56 AM
2

Not surprising. For example, the courts. It has been known and openly discussed for decades that Blacks, on average, get worse punishments for the same crimes. All kinds of mainstream people in media and academia have complained about this. What has not been talked about is an even bigger gap in the courts than that between Blacks and Whites. Being male, as compared to being female, is actually a worse thing than being Black compared to White. A small example: http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightsl…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:54 AM
5

My nephew was just circumcised. It was inevitable. The mainstream memes play down the harms of circumcision and make up benefits. My sister in law is overbearing and my brother is a bit of a mangina. I love him, but it's true. The procedure was performed when my sister in law was at the hospital and my brother was at work (I'm pretty sure that was intentional). My brother said that his wife told him the baby didn't cry or seem bothered. He actually believed that crap. I know she's lying and does…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:50 AM
5

May I say that your ex is a colossal cunnt. Wow. A beeitch and her similar mother getting together and being cruel and scandalous. Very sorry for all you have been through. If the world was right, they would have never gotten away with this and would have done some time in jail, along with custody being shifted.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:43 AM
3

Three year and second month anniversary, lol.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:41 AM
47

This is a positive sign. They are having trouble ignoring us.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:39 AM
2

That feminists, unsurprisingly, has no clue what she (or he?) is talking about. Just off the tippy top of my head, there have been laws sending men to war (current), forcing men to pay alimony for life (current), chivalry laws, laws forcing men to pay debts their wifes accumulated and be punished and/or go to prison if they can't come up with the money, abortion laws in which women don't even have to notify the father, adoption laws in which women don't even have to notify the father, sexual ass…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:37 AM
5

That would make me feel respected and I would appreciate it. Perhaps other cultures are more evolved and open about the mischievousness female members of our species sometimes engage in.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:21 AM
1

Absolutely outrageous and despicable. Obviously, this extreme power wielded by females and the accompanying misandry and terrorizing of men is by design. These powers are antithetical to the concept of justice and fairness. Females can, literally, just wish people they don't like from campus, as if they were gods. Horrible, horrible stuff.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:16 AM
0

Materialism and self seeking lead to wars. These are female dominated traits.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:01 AM
1

What a tedious, banal woman Fluke is....a complete stooge, a feminist "company woman".
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:52 AM
2

I agree with you completely.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:29 AM
2

There's no denying the role of Jewish women in feminism and female supremacy efforts. They have a long history of being involved Marx-inspired leftist movements. I know NAJWALT, but their presence and influence (especially for such a tiny population) has been powerful.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:07 AM
2

In the spirit of Antoine Dodson, "You'll need to hide your little boys and your older boys, cause they rapin' everybody 'round here."
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:01 AM
1

Excellent comment.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:38 PM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsZYPv9QWX0
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:45 PM
2

I"m going with fascist.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:44 AM
1

Time has its lips firmly planted on feminists and "progressives" arses. Sandra Flunkey..lol.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:40 AM
-1

Just more misandry to squeeze men. Non-custodial mothers are actually worse in paying support than non-custodial fathers.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:37 AM
3

I did 10 years in the Corps. I saw a few decent female Marines, but most were bad news. In general women, which of course female Marines are, HATE HATE HATE following a chain of command. They instead try to flirt (sometimes bed) and kiss up to people 3 or 4 notches up in their chain of command in order to try to gain lenience or immunity from following their immediate first and second level of supervisors, to get themselves sheltered from routine authority. I blame the higher ranking men that pl…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:35 AM
21

A lot of the type folks that speak that way are ideologues, some of them a little crazy, some just jerks. But, I think what is at the root in most cases is they know how powerful the victim position is. The victim position: 1) Frees you from personal responsibility for your actions or problems. 2) Gives you the moral authority to take vengenace on your alleged oppressor. 3) Grants you access to special rights and compensations. They talk about "equality" and "facts" but what they really want is …
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:25 AM
2

"Mammas don't let your babys grow up to be......like you" Here's a pdf of the paper itself: http://www.holah.co.uk/files/sheridan_king_1972.pdf
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:21 AM
2

That's how chicks roll, especially feminist chicks. Real cutthroat, cold-blooded, sneaky, and wicked. As long as they feel they have are shielded, they go straight for the jugular. As soon as their shield weakens or you battle back, they go straight to victim mode. No matter how ridiculous or cruel they get, more often than not, our culture of female supremacists and brainwashed/intimidated men back them up. Fark her.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:14 AM
5

Extra! Extra! Pathetic mangina writes article to get pats on head from females.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:56 AM
13

I saw quite an excellent reader comment that I agree wholeheartedly with on a news story about this study (link at bottom). I thought I would paste it here: leconfidant • 9 months ago − If the boy acts like a girl, the female teacher will mark him just the same as the girls. The general trend is to discourage traditionally masculine virtues for feminine. Competition no. Cooperation yes. Innovation no. Preparation yes. Risk taking no. Attention to detail, yes. And so on. There's no respect for ho…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:22 AM
5

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:41 AM
1

I hope for the best for him is well. Your English is very good. Truthfully, I did not even notice that English was a second language for you until you mentioned it.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:27 PM
1

So awful the way this man has been done and the brainwashing and drama the mother and grandmother are putting in these children's lives.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:25 PM
4

Yes, we often have tea.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:24 PM
1

Good point. With the way men are treated, it's surprising we don't see much more vigilantism.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:23 PM
2

Misandry is the norm for children's movies now. It's sometimes subtle (e.g. male characters or incompetent or cowardly) and sometimes not so subtle (male characters are evil), but it's the norm. It's our culture's norm. I could see this coming a mile away with "Brave".
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:30 AM
2

I've read a few articles about this at the Fathers and Families websites. What a nightmare of misandry and putting women on pedestals. The woman and her mother have acted despicably and have flagrantly violated the law. Yet, the government and media just keep trying to make excuses for her. Sickening.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:51 AM
5

This is a great submission. Every man new to men's rights discussions should read this. It illuminates much about underhanded tricks women use to destroy men they once claimed to love so much and how they are ready, willing, and able to callously use their own children to do so. She knew all the tricks....attacking character and reputation, manipulating gynocentric social services, false accusations, manipulation of the medical system, manipulation of the gynocentric psyhiatric profession. Wow, …
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:40 AM
1

Thank God (or Darwin, whatever your kicks) the roomate was there. Had it been one of the saintly almighty's (i.e. a woman's) word against his he would have been done for. She should be in prison for attempted assault with a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:30 AM
2

Link at bottom, here are excerpts: "Social work, however, has remained largely impervious to the growing awareness of the importance of fathers in children’s lives…" "More significantly perhaps, social work has been influenced by feminist theory, or at least by second wave feminism (Orme, 2003, Scourfield and Coffey, 2002)…" "The survival of patriarchy as an organising construct is especially strong in social work (Scourfield and Coffey, 2002). In the UK, the education and training of social wor…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:14 AM
8

Because our culture is gynocentric and misandristic. What you said bothers me too.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:40 AM
39

Wow. Alot of issues going on in that brief article--money, corruption, misandry, male disposablility. If the world was fair, he would be released and receive a large sum of money from both the state and the wife and the wife would go to prison for her financial crimes as well as her false accusations.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:39 AM
11

Chris Hansen is a parasitic, narcissistic, opportunist, misandry-propogating, pseudo white knight slimeball.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:34 AM
2

Oh my....the tedious Green Party. I watched the alternate party candidates presidential debate. Jill Stein made me cringe.....promising happiness and cotton candy and unicorns for all with no thought of the "how" or the consequences.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:42 AM
1

darn, did it again.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:28 AM
2

LOL. My bad, as a male I guess I just don't have "women's ways of knowing".
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:42 AM
10

It's a good article but one sentence did make me cringe (not at the article's author but just from my awareness as a men's rights guy): "The killer mums also had no history of violence. Not one of them had a previous conviction for violence." Duh. Women have to do sooooooooooooooo much more than men to actually get into trouble. Even repeated, pathologically violent women hardly ever have any "official record" for anything.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:41 AM
5

Just reading the title is enough for me to see how she jumps to shaming tactics.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:37 AM
-7

I liked the overall tone of Venker, calling out feminism and trying to give men some credit. But, Venker appears to me to be what I call new-traditionalist. I don't care for pseudo-traditionalist women. They're not as bad as feminists, but they're still bad. Both feminists and new-traditionalists women want women to control men; they just have different tactics. Feminists want to use totalitarian (e.g. "re-education" of the youth in public schools, endless female-only entitlements) and fascist (…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:36 AM
7

First off, the whole page is some New Left ridiculousness. Having said that, if we're being honest, nobody but nobody has privilege like women. They are treated with kid gloves, get all kinds of special favors and entitlements, and often they are left off the hook for crimes up to and including murder.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:15 AM
10

How awfully convenient it is for women to be able to murder people and then make horrible allegations and trounce the victims reputation after-the-fact. Sure is hard to tell your side of the story when you're dead. That "battered-woman defense" is the iconic example of a misandristic legal tactic designed to allow females to get away with murdering men. I say barbecue these murdering women just as surely as you would a man.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:12 AM
2

Glad to have you around panda_samawich. I"m not sure what "take the shit from the hight" means; I can't piece together what you are saying.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:02 AM
2

You're welcome, and may I compliment you on your schlong.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 11:58 PM
1

That's a pretty darn helpful thing you did there. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:40 PM
5

My pleasure.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:19 AM
2

"Mr Steedman said the complainant got herself caught up in a web of lies and it was her that should have been in court for making a false statement." Yup, definitely sounds familiar and completely unsurprising.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:18 AM
2

Nope. Good trolling though.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:17 AM
1

Get those men back in there Tajikistan. The more women are able to brainwash children unfettered the more screwed up your society will be in the long run (relative to whatever it is now).
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:15 AM
1

Slap on the wrist for the criminal with a vagina. Soooooooooooo sick of this crap.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:09 AM
2

She should be in prison for a long time. What a vile woman all around.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:05 AM
9

That's an excellent video I've watched before. Women cheering, cops walking by and doing nothing. Misandry out the yin yang.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:00 AM
2

Bill Burr talks a little about this phenomenon and the "epidemic of gold-digging whores" in his "You People are All the Same" special. He talks about how quick people (charged by a feminazi friendly media) are to discount all the accomplishments of men in these situations too. I would add that its even more evident when the man is less of a feminazi enabler. For example, had Bill Clinton been less of a feminist enforcer, I don't think he would even be a major public figure anymore.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:59 AM
2

The more something is a cultural institution and associated with males, the more feminazis hate it. That's one reason they hate football, because its history and popularity. James Bond is an obvious target. I'm not saying I think men should be like James Bond, just commenting on the psycho misandrists.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:52 AM
26

"I met him online, on a millionaire's website." LOL. It just gets worse from there. What a tedious, navel-gazing woman.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:49 AM
1

Those people make my freaking head hurt. I don't care if they do what they want but always policing other people and trying to force them to talk, think, and behave like them sucks arse.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:46 AM
14

I'm glad you posted this. It does seem, however, they made sure to go out of their way to make sure the male victims of discrimination did not get center stage. It states that 37 percent of respondents are biased against men. Then it say they went out of their way to ask about overweight women and found 51% of respondents were biased against them. Then, for reasons uknown (I'm guessing a deliberate attempt to play up women), they, apparently, did not ask about overweight men. Doesn't it make com…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:35 AM
2

There's an interesting story about the origin of the word gender. I can't remember it, but it's good (maybe someone can chime in). I never even use that dumb word. It was a word that the New Left and Feminazis used to try to discredit hard science. Funniest (most disturbing really) thing is after screaming there are no differences in the 70's and 80's feminists began loosening up just a bit on that starting in the 90's. Why? Because, they were in power. So, now the situation with them is thus: W…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:40 AM
2

You may wish to read about "maternal gatekeeping". Many mothers I've seen and heard or read about tend to be very controlling and jealous. They wanna be A-Number-One-Controlling Hot Shot at all times. Some viciously and without conscious try to actively sabotage the father's reputation and relationship in general.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:34 AM
6

That story is certainly good for a chuckle. Read it before but glad to see it submitted. A good alternate title might be: "What Happens When Everyone Still Has a Sense of Entitlement but There Are No Men Around to Blame?"
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:31 AM
1

This is an Estrogen Post hatchet job. Steve's full write up is here: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmbis/writev/womeninworkplace/m22.htm You may wish to scroll down a page or so and start at: The Reasons Why Women Won't Match Men in the Workplace Irrespective of Whatever Action is Taken
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:25 AM
-1

It's about female supremacy and fixing the game so females win all the time. Just as important is fixing the system so that men are kept in "their places" (far subordinate to women in the eyes of feminists) by keeping men constantly terrorized and intimidated. Pure misandry. Pure totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:00 AM
3

Mustaches look good (nothing wrong with not wearing them either). They've been demonized because they're a uniquely male style and all things male must be demonized in the feminized, misandristic culture we live in. Up with men and Movember, down with misandry.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:57 AM
5

What a sick, sad little broad. Pull her string, and like a misandry robot she just starts quickly spouting off rehearsed feminazi hate speech. These are exactly the people society should not pay any attention to. They're bad for everybody, men, women, children (probably animals and plants, too). The video with Warren and the other men's rights gentlemen is quite good.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:55 AM
5

Either feminists are so unthinking or stupid that they spout their ideology without ever thinking about the basic meaning behind their terms, or they are liars who use verbal dodging and weaving in order to avoid admitting that their positions contradict each other. MRAs need to stop tolerating this. Yes, yes, and yes.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:54 AM
2

Red herring. Proponents of misandry are trying to change the subject and demonize their opponents. Those who constantly say "tolerance" are some of the most underhanded, cutthroat people around.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:36 AM
8

Yet, in no area where women are outshining men is there a quota or special programs or monies for "men-only". This is about female supremacy, not equality.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:33 AM
15

" I tried to take a photo but my mom (who I mentioned before is a hardore feminist) tried to take my phone from me" WTF kind of controlling, bullying crap is that? Geez. "I think they could have put a smaller sign that said "Men $6.50, Everyone Else $4.00." Exactly. "when I asked a male staff member about it, he told me that I could either deal with it or be "removed from the area" Soooooooooooooo many men who are brainwashed, intimidated, manginas, or white knights. So sad, and so harmful for t…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:32 AM
2

Good ol' feminists, comparing apples to oranges (or pineapples or whatever fits their propaganda) since forever.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:20 AM
3

Looks like more female entitlement and female supremacy propaganda to me. I supposed that can be construed as "interesting". I was thinking more "appalling" or "disgusting".
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:17 AM
3

New Title: "A Bunch of Weak Paragraphs To Put A Thin Veneer of Journalism On My Advocation of Anti-Male Discrimination"
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:16 AM
3

Open, proud favoritism and deviation from equal rights and treatment. Misandry is culturally and governmentally ingrained.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:12 AM
6

Her Inner Monologue: "Some old washed up pedo-inclined whore touched Bieber's butt on national TV and that was okay, it's 'girl power'."
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:09 AM
11

"But this is serious because people who make false allegations make it harder for real victims to be believed." No, no, no, no, no NO NO !!! Stop saying this CRAP when announcing sentence. The MAIN problem is that she wronged the ACTUAL VICTIM, the man (Nicholas in this case). But, no no, they ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS have to couch punishing a woman who wronged a man in terms of "it's wrong because it's obliquely harmful to other women". NO!! It's wrong because of what you did to the victim, the man…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:06 AM
3

Feminists kill puppies and kittens and masturbate with their entrails. That's me acting like a feminist. Only difference is I'm targeting feminists.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:57 AM
11

"WE WENT EQUALITY !!!! ....as long as men don't have it too."
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:39 PM
2

Fark that sheitstain broad. As the saying goes, "If you didn't start no sheite, wouldn't be no sheite." The world would be a lot better place if her and her millions of sisters either: 1) Voluntarily stopped creating drama unnecessary drama or 2) Got put in check.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:46 AM
2

Yup, this would work out zero if the sexes were reversed.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 11:17 AM
1

This is true. Within 2 minutes, I'll be under attack from three white knights while ten manginas alternate between consoling the poor females and using shaming language and insults against me. Still, doing the right thing feels good even if you get mobbed (see opening scene from "The Way of the Gun").
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:40 AM
0

I agree with you that evolution is part of it, in both men and women. Men have a natural protective instinct and women have a natural instinct for manipulating men to do what they want. But, I believe the way our culture currently operates also has much to do with it. Males' early lives are completely dominated by women and, pretty much, ONLY women's perspectives (with their selfish attitudes and philosophical prejudices). In the old days, the men were near the children on the farm or working in…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:53 PM
1

On the money. Exactly what I was going to write Alleggro. Thanks for saving me the time.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:42 AM
3

Sounds really good. Boys are getting, metaphorically speaking, killed out there. They need support and need to feel proud for being boys.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:41 AM
5

Straight up abuse, bullying, and misandry happened to you that day. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:38 AM
1

I don't have a link to the study, but I know there were some feminists that did a study at high schools about sexual harassment. Naturally, they defined down the threshold of what is considered "harassment". In any case, their victim numbers about equal between males and females. Because the feminists defined down the definition of "harassment", the numbers were pretty high. To polish off their propaganda, they only talked about the female numbers to the media (a media that is nearly completely …
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:37 AM
1

Quite a good article. A couple of my favorite quotes: "They're behaving like members of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) a century ago, hooded thugs chasing down "uppity darkies" and lynching them for daring to claim that they have equal rights, and deserve to be treated with equal respect." "more ways to "help" women and and dominate men, more ways to get more money, more power, more control until all freedoms are eliminated and we are left with a totalitarian state. Which, the happy feminists believe, t…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:30 AM
3

In my view, the main issue is men refusing to form a team. Even on this subreddit (and I'm not talking about trolls), there is a significant amount of nitpicking, shaming, insulting, and generally unsupportive behavior. This among people that are supposed to be on the same team for God's (or Darwin's, take your pick) sake. Intellectualizing and being about me, me, me can be somewhat helpful in generating interest in a movement. But, a movement will never get wings unless a large number of it's m…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:25 AM
3

That critical review was quite good, pointing out the double standard. But, most interesting, bringing up the point that the type of mistreatment that people, largely, want to ignore or rationalize is more dangerous than the type of mistreatment for which people are on their guard.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:13 AM
3

I say it quite frequently, but I keep coming back to the fact that I've noticed the folks that go around saying tolerance the most are among the most intolerant people around. "How dare average men speak up without the approval of feminists or, at least, "progressives" !" is what they really are saying.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:10 AM
1

Good submission. Thanks. Did make me wince, though.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter