Desperate justification for the DSK false rape accuser.

Roeratt · 2011-07-02T16:54:13+00:00

"Such attacks often carry an implicit assumption that a woman -- especially if she is poor, associates with unsavory characters, lives in a dodgy neighborhood, etc. -- may have deserved what she got and is not entitled to our sympathy or to legal protection."

There's already an implicit assumption that a man is always out to get some no matter what the situation, so...

Darkling5499 · 2011-07-02T18:41:17+00:00

this entire case has been bullshit from the start. she's changed her story atleast 4 times that i know of (from he raped her, to he tried to rape her, to he tried to rape her and when she resisted tried to force her to give him a BJ, and he tried to rape her and then tried to make her give him a Bj but she resisted.

the bitch lied about being gangraped in ghana to gain political asylum in the US in the first place. why she was given ANY credibility at all is beyond me.

Godspiral · 2011-07-02T12:33:39+00:00

Proven liars should have a difficult time making rape allegations, and prosecutors should refuse to follow through and damage the life of accused men by having a time consuming and expensive trial the prosecution should necessarily lose.

Past rape liars deserve an especially critical skepticism, because their next rape lies are likely to be better prepared and sophisticated.

Its definitely possible that she was still attacked. There is a ring of truth to the cirmcumstances it was reported and very soon afterwards. Still its also possible that it was a setup, or an improvised plot to eventually sue. It is a just world to prevent previous false rape complainants, or even frequent rape complainants, from the power to harrass men with future rape complaints. Understanding that false rape accusations are serious would sink in, if it prevented the liar from judicial protection for future rapes (without perfect evidence).

Liverotto · 2011-07-02T12:02:08+00:00

Women are defending their sister like Black people defended their brother OJ in the 90's.

AntiFeministMedia · 2011-07-02T11:22:08+00:00

Hey Lynn Parramore (author of the article) some women lie about rape. What do you think about that. Why dont you write an article on false-rape accusers?

Stupid woman.

Lynn Parramore you are a stupid, stupid woman.

And the best of it is, she has forced an apology from a male blogger that she quotes in the article. Now, I havent read his full article, but in her quotes from the offending piece, it seems like nothing at all.

This unfortunate impression of trivialization continues in Kuttner’s discussion of a detail “that calls Strauss-Kahn’s judgment into question,” namely, his taste in restaurants. He finds DSK’s choice on luncheon venue that day to be “mediocre and overpriced,” suggesting that “a sophisticated diner confusing a chain restaurant with a decent New York eatery is almost capable of mistaking a housekeeper for a hooker.”

She has found a way to close down the debate.

She's just another woman that when rape is mentioned by anyone, jumps down their throats. She wants to stop the debate before it starts, and if the rape/false rape issue suddenly becomes something we can make a joke about, then we are all going to feel more at ease discussing it.

She, like most women and feminists, doesnt want that debate to happen. She, like most women and the feminists, are afraid of what might be the result of a full and honest debate on rape/false rape.

Do people see how women hold back civilization?

By trying to convice everyone that what she says in this article is the real truth, see leads people down a path of total bullshit.

It doesnt have to be rape, women like this will talk bullshit to try and justify all sorts of nonsense, that we know as a society is wrong, like not sending women to prison for committing crime because they have children, and that it would harm them the most (even though not sending women to prison is an encouragement to all women that they can commit crime and get away with it, and so more children will be harmed by not taking action). Or that single-motherhood is fine for children, even though it harms the life chances of their own children.

This is what women have always done. The truth doesnt matter to them, just so long as they get what they want.

Men, children, society, civilization, none of that matters, as long as women get what they want.

So we give in to them (because we're human), and the situation gets worse (as it inevitably does when dealing with women).

We go backwards

Fucking think about it. How many men here could be doing something different than this? just think of what we could be doing if we didnt spend so much time here and investgating the bullshit that women and feminists have put into the general consciousness.

What a waste of time these women are.

Title	Desperate justification for the DSK false rape accuser.
Author	phlake14222
Upvotes	30
Comments	30
Date	July 2, 2011 9:53 AM UTC (15 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iewpj/desperate_justification_for_the_dsk_false_rape/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/desperate-justification-for-the-dsk-false-rape.1037864 https://theredarchive.com/post/1037864

Comments