Consensual incest: why is not the daughter charged?

HeadoftheHydra · 2010-12-11T09:31:35+00:00

Because it is a bullshit charge left over from the days when society was ruled by the morality of Victorian-era douche-bags.

In other words, DERP! We dunno' what to do lolz!

The guy fucked his of-age daughter. The man has every right to do that. He brought her into this world; he can bang her. As long as she's of age and says "fuck me daddy". A lot. Like, the more the better.

Seriously though, no crime here. Move it along.

Grayswan · 2010-12-11T13:18:54+00:00

Althouse's take. Ending with:

"the Court did assert that in Lawrence, so according to Justice Scalia, under the existing precedent, consensual adult incest cannot survive rational-basis review."

Infammo · 2010-12-12T00:17:52+00:00

Its gross as hell but I don't think either one of them should be charged with anything.

jelliedbabies · 2010-12-12T00:58:14+00:00

In this case probably because he's the parent but with her being 21ish when it supposedly started who cares. She's big enough and old enough to make decisions I don't agree with but who is anyone else to judge?

pitchblackangel13 · 2010-12-11T22:23:49+00:00

good point...

Quazz · 2010-12-11T06:33:42+00:00

Yeah, wtf :S

Title	Consensual incest: why is not the daughter charged?
Author	a_true_bro
Upvotes	8
Comments	6
Date	December 11, 2010 6:31 AM UTC (15 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ejyvp/consensual_incest_why_is_not_the_daughter_charged/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/consensual-incest-why-is-not-the-daughter-charged.1045287 https://theredarchive.com/post/1045287

Comments