Women for Afghan Women (WAW), explained that without a long-term U.S. military commitment, women "will be back in the dark ages."

plumeria · 2010-01-26T00:14:12+00:00

Well I know that Napoleon couldn't do it, and neither could Ghangas Khan, but Damnit, we will be the ones to conquer them (culturally speaking)

windynights · 2010-01-25T21:45:32+00:00

"Many on the left believed military intervention abroad to be a logical extension of its attempt to perfect mankind at home." Amazing! This was a chief plank in the Bush Doctrine. Opposites attract!

BinaryShadow · 2010-01-27T10:54:24+00:00

Then why don't they go over there and fight and let the guys come home?

2010-01-29T01:40:56+00:00

If they deserve life, let them stand for themselves.

Title	Women for Afghan Women (WAW), explained that without a long-term U.S. military commitment, women "will be back in the dark ages."
Author	AccordionHero
Upvotes	2
Comments	6
Date	January 25, 2010 3:50 PM UTC (16 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/atxq8/women_for_afghan_women_waw_explained_that_without/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/women-for-afghan-women-waw-explained-that-without.1051071 https://theredarchive.com/post/1051071

Comments