Woman convicted of "having sex" with a 5 year old.

neoform3 · 2008-09-19T17:38:42+00:00

IMPOSSIBLE! women aren't pedophiles! only strange men are! they should let this innocent woman go and focus on the real threat, men.

Smiley · 2008-09-19T15:27:54+00:00

feedback to cfnews13:

Why is it that, in the attached article, you say that the woman "had sex" with the five year old?

Were the sexes reversed, would you have said that the older men "had sex" with a young girl, or that he "molested" or "sexually abused her?"

The difference in terminology is sexist and sanitizes the offensive nature of women who molest children.

jabb0 · 2008-09-19T15:52:25+00:00

I wonder how many dudes read this and wondered why they cant get laid but a 5 year old can.

2008-09-19T15:28:47+00:00

hat tip lexie01

aenea · 2008-09-19T18:09:02+00:00

I can't imagine any "duress" that my husband could put me under to convince me to molest a 5 year old.

belandil · 2008-09-19T19:32:15+00:00

I had no idea Angelina Jolie was a pedophile

2008-09-20T05:52:10+00:00

Anyone else think life in prison with no possibilty of parole is way, way too much? The only reason to give someone that is if they were so dangerous they couldn't be trusted not to kill someone as soon as they got out. This person had sex with a five year old once. Granted, the kid is probably scarred for life, but depending on how a psychologist evaluated him, I'd give her between ten and thirty years with possibility of parole after five years or something.

It really pisses me off how harsh the US(and other) justice systems are on criminals. Like those fraudsters who effectively get life in jail with no parole? No fraudster deserves that. Come on now.

Britslayer · 2008-09-20T07:30:36+00:00

“The fact that the defendant faces a Draconian punishment for a crime where the victim is alive and apparently living a normal life some eleven years after the criminal act, when criminals who have killed people are released from prison almost daily, makes it even more imperative that the defendant receive a fair and impartial trial . . . ” he wrote.

Blogger: Hmmm, not only did Lumadue admit in court that she performed the sex acts, but the jurors saw the tapes! Are you kidding me with this?

I just don't get how someone can read something so clear and concise and still not get it.

2008-09-19T15:32:34+00:00

be sure to check the underlying articles. she had been charged previously.

SilverPaladin · 2008-09-19T15:51:44+00:00

I've seen that before in other statutory rape cases involving a male victim and female perp. At least in this case she was sentenced harshly compared to some others. I suppose that given the boy's age, it was impossible to say that he consented. The one thing that gets me though is...

“The fact that the defendant faces a Draconian punishment for a crime where the victim is alive and apparently living a normal life some eleven years after the criminal act, when criminals who have killed people are released from prison almost daily, makes it even more imperative that the defendant receive a fair and impartial trial . . . ”

While I'm all for fair and impartial trials, no matter the crime, it strikes me as odd that a judge would (and even has the capability!) to overturn a jury's decision. Seems to me that the whole point of a jury is to insure a fair and impartial trial.

Another thing is that, while I'm by no means a psychologist, I would think that something like this would have long term effects on someone subconsciously whether they remember what happened or not.

infosnax · 2008-09-19T16:44:44+00:00

Sorry, but everyone seems to be missing the point. The "victim" has no recollection of the crime and is reportedly living a normal life. So it's essentially a victimless crime. Why are we putting this person in jail for life when we have a crime without a victim?

2008-09-19T20:40:57+00:00

[permanently deleted]

TL_DR · 2008-09-19T22:22:17+00:00

Pics or it didn't happen!!!!

JustJoekingEX · 2008-09-19T17:19:52+00:00

she has the face of a saint... bernard lol

Title	Woman convicted of "having sex" with a 5 year old.
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	36
Comments	47
Date	September 19, 2008 3:27 PM UTC (17 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/72dai/woman_convicted_of_having_sex_with_a_5_year_old/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/woman-convicted-of-having-sex-with-a-5-year-old.1056603 https://theredarchive.com/post/1056603

Comments