My question is simply this: if part of the Red Pill philosophy is about men embracing their biological nature as 'hunters' of women based on their physical characteristics... then isn't it wrong to not expect women to embrace THEIR biological nature (ie. 'hypergamy') too?

 

It's a pretty widely accepted thing that men and women both have a tendency to 'size each other up' when they're looking for a partner.

 

Men look for women with large hips and big boobs because there's a part of their psyche that is unconsciously evaluating her for signs of fertility. ie. big boobs means better breastfeeding, wide hips means easier birth.

 

By the same token, women look for men that have a flash car and lots of money because it's a good indicator that he can provide for her and her children. They also look for men with better developed upper bodies because it's a sign of physical strength, another factor in keeping her family safe.

 

I mean, that's part of the whole reason that lifting and focusing on your work and finances is so heavily emphasized by TRP and 'game' theory, right?

 

So, if it's okay for men to take full advantage of that, shouldn't it be wrong to demonize women who are willing to take advantage of the OTHER side of that coin - using their physical features to 'marry up'?

 

And I'm definitely NOT referring to cheating here, since I know damn well most TRPers aren't interested in a relationship. I'm simply referring to women who have 'sugar daddies' or being attracted to men based on finances alone. Hell, even Prostitutes, why not?

 

I guess what I'm saying here is - does the whole 'AWALT' thing actually have to be a condemnation? If TRP is saying it's okay for guys to play the field based on physical features (ie. the pump and dump), then is it okay for a woman to do it based on money (ie. the 'golddigger')?

 

... And could this NOT possibly be a point of relation between TRPers and Feminists (with the whole polygamy thing)? Would that be a stage at which it would be necessary to accept that women aren't just vaginas with other things attached to them?