~ archived since 2018 ~

Men on feminism - somehow it's just not about "equality"

dingoperson2 · 2021-10-11T20:57:08+00:00

Crosspost ""As I write this my children are asleep... and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo"" from...

dingoperson2

October 11, 2021

42 upvotes

/r/AntiFeminists

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Men on feminism - somehow it's just not about "equality"
Author	dingoperson2
Upvotes	42
Comments	26
Date	October 11, 2021 8:57 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/AntiFeminists
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/q65ljg/men_on_feminism_somehow_its_just_not_about/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/AntiFeminists/men-on-feminism-somehow-its-just-not-about.1080038 https://theredarchive.com/post/1080038

Comments

[–]VeteranOfDepression 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]dingoperson2[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]sinfulcucumber -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]dingoperson2[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah because that definitely happened. Stop believing everything you see on the internet and weaponising it as a form of justification to espouse hatred towards feminism. /u/sinfulcucumber https://archive.vn/Cqgpe

Very sad to hear about how those pixels fired from that Assault Reddit-15 went straight through your head without impacting much. The text gun merchants came from this location:

https://www.thecut.com/2015/07/what-open-marriage-taught-one-man-about-feminism.html

About The Cut: We are in a dynamic conversation with women about the issues that matter to them most — politics, feminism, work, money, relationships, mental health, fashion and issues relating to equality.

Our stories are organized around four categories: Style, Self, Culture, and Power — words that give us a framework for what it means to be a woman moving forward in the world today.

Be careful about labelling a named all-feminist team with things like Jen Ortiz as too stupid, amateurish, incompetent, clueless, feminist, gullible and bigoted to be able to run a magazine and vet their own contributors as authentic though -- maybe you'll have some rabid feminists invade your home with a weaponized Comic Sans.

There's no need to find any additional justification for treating feminists as nonhuman bioslime who have no rights to anything at all inside or outside of themselves. After all, belonging to a movement that praises and looks up to a pedophilia evangelist and terrorist who directed mass bombings against random civilians as just a few amongst likeminded kind of justifies your surroundings taking action against you for the sake of all of us.

[–]sinfulcucumber -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]dingoperson2[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fundamental reading comprehension? Your presumption that Jen Ortiz, Jordan Larson and Kerensa Cadenas are more likely than not fantastically incompetent at their jobs and fail to vet writers as real is, after all, your fantasy. Go ahead and campaign for them being removed from the industry for printing fake texts, if that's what you believe.

Also, fantastic job dismissing an extended ideological mass terrorist bombing campaign targeting random civilians by a globally hero-worshipped feminist as a "cherry-picked anecdote".

Unlike most feminists, I wouldn't hail someone who deliberately tried to harm and disfigure as many random women as possible over several years as a visionary hero.

After all, most women are not feminists. When people use chemicals to clean their car parts, the car parts at least aren't antihuman bioslime beyond any human rights.

[–]sinfulcucumber -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your presumption that authors do not amplify or – for lack of better wording; “click-bait” – the content within their social media articles for viewership, since that is quite literally what they are paid to do, highlights your lack of discernment and the ability to gauge between what is ‘real’ and what strictly consists within the online sphere. To me, it seems like the male within this article is wearing the feminist label as a banner, when in reality, feminism neither encourages or discourages polyamory relationships. In all honesty, what the fuck does this article even have to do with feminism?

Also, fantastic job dismissing an extended ideological mass terrorist bombing campaign targeting random civilians by a globally hero-worshipped feminist as a "cherry-picked anecdote".

I apologise – allow me to correct myself.

Thank you oh holier-than-thou for calling attention to the suffragette bombings that occurred in the year 1912. I will make sure to not dismiss this important piece of information that you have brought to light and ensure that I direct all of my time and attention to addressing this campaign that took place over a hundred years ago that has absolutely nothing to do with the modern feminist movement of today’s century.

I do find it interesting that you ignored my remark in regards to the men’s rights movement, though. Do you keep that same energy towards the men’s rights movement? Or do you dismiss the hypocrisy like the typical anti-feminist stereotype you are? As long as it’s women we’re demonising, it doesn’t matter, right?

After all, most women are not feminists. When people use chemicals to clean their car parts, the car parts at least aren't antihuman bioslime beyond any human rights.

You’re wrong, but even so, most women – and men – are not anti-feminists, either. It’s scary how you’re insinuating that feminists are undeserving of rights due to your lack of nuance and inability to distinguish between liberal and radical (militant) feminism.

A total number of 61% (every six in ten) of women within the US identify as feminist.

Hint: that number is equal to more than half, which means most women do identify as feminist.

[–]MarquisdeSeda 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Ok_Razzmatazz_1751 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Dr_Hesp 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]__pebble____ 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]manicraccoon 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Longjumping-Back214 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]dingoperson2[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Longjumping-Back214 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]sinfulcucumber -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Longjumping-Back214 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]sinfulcucumber -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Longjumping-Back214 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]sinfulcucumber -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Longjumping-Back214 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]sinfulcucumber -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]yellomachine 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Harry_Teak 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]yellomachine 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Harry_Teak 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Crosspost ""As I write this my children are asleep... and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo"" from /r/SocialJusticeInAction:

Comments