People support women's sexual entitlement but condemn men's sexual entitlement. They say women don't owe men sex but believe men owe women sex. If they believed sexual entitlement was so bad, they wouldn't condone women's sexual entitlement.
When a woman has exceptionally high standards, people defend it and accuse you of sexual entitlement just for calmly recommending she lowers her standards because most men won't fit her "mr. perfect" idea. but if a man has any standards, people condemn him harshly and command him to give any woman he doesn't find attractive a chance.
women want tall men only=ok but men don't want a super obese woman=bad (women consider obesity a dealbreaker too fyi)
women dump a guy because he's 22 and works at a warehouse (like as if that's his job at 40 anyway)=ok but man doesn't wanna date a woman he has no physical attraction to=bad
Women won't date a virgin (or a promiscous man because she thinks he's a womanizer)=ok but a man won't date a woman who fucked 50 strangers=bad
whenever a man even refuses to date a 2/10 woman people automatically assume he only wants supermodels and they condemn him. whenever a man says no to sex, people think he's gay and that he should automatically consent to a woman, but a woman says no and that's considered ok.
feminists harshly condemn any man who won't date certain types of women and commands men to date certain types of women, but if a man is even slightly disappointed a woman rejected him they cry "sexual entitlement!!!!111".
when women orgasm less than men, feminists call it a catastrophe or patriarchy (even though women's orgasms are more multifaceted and harder to happen anyway) but when men are less sexually active than women or more single than women or when a man is depressed because he's still a dateless virgin in adulthood, feminists automatically assume he's a sexually entitled misogynist. I've seen NON-hateful virgin men get kicked while they're down accused of misogyny online.
if people (including feminists) were against sexual entitlement because its wrong they wouldn't support women's sexual entitlement. so why the double standard? because men pursue, women get pursued. men are considered the initiators and women are considered the gatekeepers. because women get pursued, they're expected to have all these options to choose from because so many men pursue her, so she's expected to be more selective than men and only choose the cream of the crop. she gets pursued, so she decides if she wants him or not. she's expected to be choosy if she has so many options she can choose from and can pick the best guy. it's considered ok for her to say no to sex.
men however are expected to be the initiators who pursue, so they're expected to do everything they can to get laid and to automatically say yes to any offering of sex. because women will be selective and reject a lot of men, men are expected to lower their standards to increase the number of women they pursue to increase the chances of finding a woman to have as a partner. this "men pursue women get pursued" rule exists because people think evolutionarily men are supposed to impregnate tons of women to populate the Earth and thus have low standards to increase the number of women they impregnate metaphorically (or pursue in actuality). women are expected to pick which man who wants to impregnate her will have the best genes, be the best provider/investor etc and only the man who is most evolutionarily adaptive gets picked.
men are expected to have low standards, women are expected to have high standards. women having super high standards is conforming to her gender roles, but men having any standards is defying his gender role. that's why women who fuck any man who pursues her is labeled "easy" or considered promiscuous. that's why people think "men will fuck anything" or "men are hypersexual more than women". feminists might say they hate gender roles for women, but they still subconsciously endorse a lot of them, just like how they endorse gender roles for men.
this also is why people think all rapists are men and all rape victims are women. but this is also why people condemn only men's sexual entitlement but don't condemn (and even condone) women's sexual entitlement.
so why do people oppose MEN's sexual entitlement? this is why.
[–]thedumbox1998 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]mikesteane -13 points-12 points-11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]shit-zen-giggles 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hour-Mission7829[S] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]shit-zen-giggles 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Hour-Mission7829[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hour-Mission7829[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hour-Mission7829[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ToadMugen72 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]macrotransactions 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hailtotheking999 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link