Found this while lurking around comment sections, did not write it myself.
What a convincing argument you provide. Perhaps you'd like to represent equality rather just just women or a side. Because presently, 1st world women have more access to education, just for being female. Presently, 1st world women have a much better chance of starting and being financed for a business, just for being a woman. Further, 1st world women receive a more favorable form of justice within western courts (look at the numbers relating to sentencing terms for men & women that commit equal crimes). Want a challenge from life? Complete the bar examination, become a divorce and/or custody attorney, and only represent husbands or dads.
Your "PR statements" lose any substance when you're willing to accept favors & special treatment for being a woman, while literally watching your counterparts discriminated against based on their sex. Fighting sexism while accepting perks that are solely based on sex. Do you know what irony means, or would you like it explained? Are these freedom fighters for "equality" at all voicing concern for what men aren't getting just for being men? No. Stop preaching equality while accepting inequality. Stop settling for and supporting misbehaviors by women in relation men (IE: The View - genital mutilation. Google it), while expecting higher standards from said targeted party. Stop supporting a gender biased/catering media.
Stop looking at the world through a one sided lens, while calling it something else.
Stop railing against the video game industry because it has attracted a primarily male audience during the coarse of its existence, while suggesting its sexists. Is it sexist that many more men than women prefer engineering occupations by nature? No. Is it any more "sexist" that this work field reflects my previous statement? Again, no. Its no more sexist that men & boys gravitating toward entertainment formats that become male majority in make-up. The romance literature genre makes up more than half (around 55%) of the sales of published fiction within a year. Books that blatantly "sexualize" men, in a fashion that equates to the popular fantasy version of a man or men. Are you campaigning that this industry devote equal effort to males? Are you crusading against an industry that falsely sexualizes men to adolescent girls & adult women, while using terms like misandry? No, you're not.
You've chosen a "team", while claiming that you just enjoy the sport. You're approaching the world with a bias, and through that have developed an agenda that would see your "team" favored and increase its chance of winning, while accepting "bad calls" and slanted rules that hold the opposing 'team' down.
Too many feminists have become the very thing you claim to fight: blatant sexists
Anyone with a brain acknowledges that the REAL feminist "victory" is the acceptance of women as human beings who deserve more rights than others and the convenience of gender card playing.
[–]rightsbot 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]andreasvastolorde -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]andreasvastolorde -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]andreasvastolorde -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]andreasvastolorde -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RedSkiesatDawn 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]serenitary -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]StuntPotato 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link