Has anyone else noticed this line of reasoning being used to avoid and ignore half of an issue? Usually when I see it the person will reply with something that is clearly pasted from some radfem website in rebuttal to me bringing up aspects of the same issue being discussed in relation to men. Once I respond to their studies (usually simply by reading them and pasting relevant parts that actually back up my argument) they try to shut it down by claiming it is off topic.

How do you argue with someone that considers a male student getting raped by their teacher as a "separate issue" than the same thing happening to a female student? You end up having to arguing that all rape is bad to people who claim to have that exact view. I guess their view is all rape (of women) is bad and they just assume the exclusion of males is implied?

I am not sure if this has been a common thing or if I am just noticing the people who do this more as normal people become more accepting of mens issues. It seems like the same tactic racist used in the early 1900s to keep black men down. Are terms like "one of the good ones" soon going to be used to describe men in general? Is "hes not a rapist" going to be similar to "well-spoken black man" implying most men are rapist unless proven otherwise.