High or Low N-Count?

Aaren_Augustine · 2017-10-25T16:19:48+00:00

Would you hire a fry cook that can't keep a job to be CEO of your company? High n count is an indicator that she has no idea how to act in a relationship.

quicklogaccount · 2017-10-25T16:29:18+00:00

You need to choose by yourself man.

High count: More LIKELY to have the skills and awareness that might make her a fun and decent partner. MUCH more LIKELY to act entitled and offer her boyfriend a TERRIBLE deal in committing to a relationship (better player). CERTAINLY harder to handle, requires a stronger frame and is more unforgiving about the loss of it.
In less words, you pay above her face value for the highest POTENTIAL.

Low count: Less LIKELY to have the awareness needed to make a good partner (you'll have to guide her), CERTAINLY less fun. But MUCH more LIKELY to be easier to handle and more forgiving about frame losses.
Or, you pay her face value and probably will get it. Bear in mind it's more and more common that they fail to meet this value.

It's ultimately about how you value things and which one you choose.
As a rule of thumb the least experienced the guy is the higher the weight he gives to the sex, so an experienced chick's low value sex will most often tip the balance against her.
The more experienced the guy, the more confidence he has, the lesser the weight he gives for sex. So you see experienced people committing to each other more often and for less time (they quit when they don't meet the potential).

There's an heuristic that can't be freely said outside here but will do the trick for you. If you don't commit to a chick that fucked more than you did, you'll both probably be ok. If you do, you (guy) will probably have hard times because of whims and wills she might not even be truly aware of.

Shukakun · 2017-10-25T16:15:20+00:00

No such thing as a low quality woman unless she's hideous, in which case it's a no-brainer. Cute, slim, mentally unstable women don't have a hard time getting laid.

As for the low n-count thing, some science indicates that a high n-count makes it difficult for women to pair-bond. So if you're looking for a lifelong partnership (good luck), low n-count is a good thing. If you're looking for a one night stand or a fuckbuddy, it really doesn't matter.

Anduin_Durden · 2017-10-25T21:18:55+00:00

You went wrong at the implication. TRP has never implied that low n count means low quality. In fact, it preaches the opposite.

Low n count is good for looking for a life partner. That’s high quality.

High n count is good when you are looking for a plate. That’s high quality in that sense.

See how you can’t just label it one way?

SaneMan29 · 2017-10-26T10:49:52+00:00

Okay, so a low n-count is a good thing if you're looking for a LTR. Because even a HB1 could get laid every night of the week if she so desires - as mentioned in this topic.

As has also been mentioned that anything 2-5 is high. And anything above 10 is undateable.

Then you have McVaghunter saying that an AVERAGE girl will go through 500 dicks a decade. So let's assume a loss of virginity at 18. So by the time she is 28 she has had 500 dicks. By the time she is 23 she has had 250.

The average woman is apparently getting through 50 dicks a year.

So a "good" girl gets through what 30 dicks a year?

A really good girl gets through 20 dicks a year?

And a really really really good girl gets through 10 dicks a year?

So clearly by this logic there are no girls suitable to have a LTR with.

My gf is 23 and says she has slept with me and 2 other guys.

She lost her virginity at 17. So she is lying to me?

At best she has slept with 60 guys. At worst she has slept with 300.

And she is saying she has slept with just 3. WTF

Is she lying? Should I dump her ass right now and go spin some plates?

McVaghunter · 2017-10-25T16:38:21+00:00

All females' n-counts can be demonstrated by an exponential growth graph (Population refers to the penises that lived temporary inside one of the female's holes. It can also refer to the amount of STDs a female has). There are no exceptions to this graph.

Only young females can have a low n-count, older females never have a low n-count. Any close-to-hit-the-wall cunt telling you otherwise is just lying.

oldredder · 2017-10-25T16:40:02+00:00

whatever you're good with.

I'm much more concerned about the STD factor and maybe what other fucked up thing is going on. I never turned a girl away for high N count till one bragged she had 100 by age 25. That was just too far too fast and told me something else is wrong and I don't want to be part of it. Which is too bad because otherwise she was hot but she wasn't fun to be around.

Shukakun · 2017-10-25T16:15:27+00:00

No such thing as a low quality woman unless she's hideous, in which case it's a no-brainer. Cute, slim, mentally unstable women don't have a hard time getting laid.

As for the low n-count thing, some science indicates that a high n-count makes it difficult for women to pair-bond. So if you're looking for a lifelong partnership (good luck), low n-count is a good thing. If you're looking for a one night stand or a fuckbuddy, it really doesn't matter.

Title	High or Low N-Count?
Author	SaneMan29
Upvotes	0
Comments	22
Date	October 25, 2017 4:03 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/78on9z/high_or_low_ncount/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/high-or-low-n-count.116920 https://theredarchive.com/post/116920

Comments