Sane, fair, nuanced discussion of what is at risk of loss from the #metoo movement.

2017-12-06T13:20:09+00:00

After dinner, he asked her if she wanted to go back to his place. She declined. They went on several more dates, though, and eventually she told him that the reason she didn’t go back to his apartment that first night was that he didn’t ask forcefully enough.

And if he was more forceful it would be rape.

Men can't win.

Ordinate1 · 2017-12-06T15:04:25+00:00

Wow, something sane from Slate.

I'm a leftie, and normally roll my eyes at their articles.

ee4m · 2017-12-06T10:36:33+00:00

I think what we are seeing is ultra individualism.

The powers that be have systematically broken down human groupings in favour of individualism.

The nuclear family while still a collective, is an isolated and legally controlled collective.

Thats being broken down, and male and female relationships are being broken down too.

Meanwhile the elite keep their extended families and collective class interests intact.

Individual work, productivity and consumer units - thats all we are in the system.

Title	Sane, fair, nuanced discussion of what is at risk of loss from the #metoo movement.
Author	paracog
Upvotes	8
Comments	9
Date	December 6, 2017 9:48 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7hx1jf/sane_fair_nuanced_discussion_of_what_is_at_risk/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/sane-fair-nuanced-discussion-of-what-is-at-risk-of.1173782 https://theredarchive.com/post/1173782

Comments