~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]Dunkolunko 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Thank you! We get a lot of trolls here who say they want to learn but actually just think they have a logic trap to prove us wrong or hypocritical) if they can get us to say something. It never works but they try! So please understand if a few people are suspicious please understand they have bad experience with people who claim to come in good faith. But you do seem genuine.
Here's a few figures. If you search the sub for keywords here you can find sources for them.
Men lack numerous legal rights given to women in the west: bodily integrity (circumcision), the right to vote without signing up for the draft, the right to be recognized as rape victims from penis-vagina nonconsensual sex, the right to abdicate from legal parenthood at any stage up to the child's infancy, the right to not become a parent through deception, the right to non-discriminatory hiring based on sex (women are considered a protected group so affirmative action from them but not for men).
Men are 21 times more likely to be shot and killed by police than women. Even if you factor in violent crime rate, still 4x more, even as the violent crime rate is probably not as high as shown as men are significantly more likely to be arrested, charged, go to trial, be convicted and go to prison, especially for sexual and domestic violence. Men recieve 63% longer sentences when accounting for criminal charge, criminal history, etc.
Women have been doing better in school than boys since around 1980, and things have been getting worse. Not only are their countless programs, scolarships and changes in the education system designed to help girls, but studies show that teachers consistently mark boys lower and girls hugher when they know the gender of the child who submitted the piece of work.
In the US, as one example, there are literally hundreds of government funded programs for the protection and advancement of women. One male only program - the draft.
When made-to-penetrate is counted, men and women are raped at similar rates. Many studies also show near pwrity in domestic violence, yet all western countries (actually I've never heard of any country that doesn't) run their DV and sexual violence campaigns and programs on a gendered narrative of men oppressing women, based mostly on the unscientific duluth model.
I could go all day, that's just a start.
[–]GhostBunny667 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Oh wow thank you so much ! Some of these topics are ones I've already taken a pretty heavy interest in .
What sort of started this for me was reading an article about a man in my area who committed suicide after pleading to get help funding his men's abuse safe house that he ran on his own dime, and once again being turned down. After being forced to close the doors and putting the home for sale he ended his life.
It shook me that these types of resources are not deemed crucial and basic .
I do understand being suspicious, I would be too. And have been in reversed situations. And I can be argumentative and like to play devils advocate when it's unpopular. I still support women's movements, but the toxic nature of the groups that spawn from modern day feminism is embarrassing.
Id like to see men and women advocating for eachother to bring eachother up rather than demonizing one another.
[–]79johnsmith 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If there is one concept you have to be aware of, it is Gamma Bias (https://youtu.be/LHYRYKCIDxk), from /u/mhandanna/, (https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gutafq/gamma_bias_a_new_term_we_should_be_regularly/)
Psychologists know that it’s common for people to harbour all sorts of conflicts, biases and distortions in their thinking. In relation to gender, psychologists have identified alpha bias (exaggerating or magnifying gender differences) and beta bias (ignoring or minimising gender differences). Seager & Barry (2019) have now developed a hypothesis relating to a third cognitive gender bias – gamma bias – which represents a combination of alpha and beta bias. Gamma bias occurs when one gender difference is minimised while simultaneously another is magnified. The gamma bias phenomenon can be conceptualised as a symmetrical 2*2 matrix of cognitive distortions, the gender distortion matrix. The matrix below describes examples of gamma bias, where perceptions of men and women are differentially magnified (capital letters underlined) or minimised (lower case letters in italics). (FOR TABLE SEE ARTICLE) Within the “celebration” cell, for example, the positive achievements of women are routinely celebrated as a gender issue. Within the same cell in the table, the positive actions and achievements of men are not similarly celebrated or gendered. For example, when a group of boys was recently rescued from dangerous underwater caves in Thailand, it was not reported as a gender issue or as a positive example of masculinity, despite the fact that all the rescuers were male. In the “victimhood” cell, domestic violence against women, for example, is highlighted as a gender issue, whereas domestic violence against men is played down or completely ignored, despite the substantial numbers of male victims. When men make up the majority of victims (e.g. suicide, rough sleeping, deaths at work, addiction), the issues are not highlighted or portrayed as gender issues. Within the “privilege” cell, male privileges are magnified in our media and politics as “patriarchy” whereas female privileges (for example relating to children and family life) are played down or ignored as gender issues. The overall impact of gamma bias therefore, according to this hypothesis, is that masculinity is made to look significantly worse than it really is whilst simultaneously femininity is made to look significantly better than it really is. What are the implications of the routine magnifying of the worst of men and minimising the worst of women? Well, for a start we might need to reconceptualise the ‘crisis of masculinity’ as a crisis in our attitudes towards men and masculinity.
(https://malepsychology.org.uk/2018/12/04/why-are-there-so-many-disagreements-about-gender-issues-its-usually-down-to-gamma-bias/)
[–]Dunkolunko 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Agreed. I have come to find IDpol hateful, dishonest and divisive, we should be working towards a world that's better for everyone, and discrimination and bigotry are not one way streets in a heirarchy of privelege. I don't consider myself a feminist, because that's part of that whole system, but I would consider myself a women's rights advocate where those rights are lacking. TBH though I almost never see it these days. What do you think are areas women lack rights or are societally held back more than men?
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
On an institutional level , at least where I am from, you are completely right that most if not all systems lean or favor women. We have not only fought for equality, but when we recieved it we continued to fight and look for more battles. And the more I learn about the rates of sexual crimes against men, the less it feels like a solitary battle. I understand that crimes of that nature leave a long lasting effect and mistrust , and I would be lying if I said that for a while I did not struggle with that. Demonizing men based on the evil actions of a few , because it's difficult to seperate personal experiences from the bigger picture sometimes. These are reasons why I believe that we need to be back to fighting for equality yet again, but instead empowering or men/ father's in the courts, and be providing the resources that are desperately needed . Lately I've been trying to support and promote women in the arts because they are massively under represented. I do find it's very common for women opinions to be overlooked or talked over. That it's difficult to be taken seriously. That it's hard not to be reduced to the outfit I wore that day, and there is quick blame placed when something inappropriate happens. I've been groped on busses in the middle of the day along with a hundred other similar occurences. Sexism still exists greatly, even if it is not on the same systematic level. The way attorneys attack women who do come forward seeking justice. I am not saying blindly believe every claim, but you can question someone without it becoming a whole new traumatic experience. I'm not trying to be ignorant, I've just never watched or read transcripts from a court case with a male sexual assault Vic, so there is a chance that men on the stand and destroyed in the same ways.
[–]79johnsmith 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
we recieved it we continued to fight and look for more battles
The issues that western Feminists fight for now are for more power and privileges, using Apex fallacies (eg. women should exempted from jail, quotas for women in leadership position / in company directorships, not enough women in STEM so more women only scholarships despite women making 60% of all college graduates), either that or it is extremely trivial (eg. manspreading), while denying issues that affect men (eg. men cannot be raped, domestic abuse only means men beating on their wives).
[–]ApprehensiveMail8 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"I've just never watched or read transcripts from a court case with a male sexual assault Vic, so there is a chance that men on the stand and destroyed in the same ways."
Ha. No, not really.
Because as Dunko pointed out above, men do not have the legal right to be recognized as rape victims from penis-vagina nonconsensual sex in the first place.
To be fair, this statement is slightly out of date. Beginning in the 1970's, many states and countries began changing their definition from "the unlawful carnal knowledge of a female by a male" to more gender neutral statements.
However, in some places the laws still haven't been changed. And in areas where the law has changed, well, it's only been 30-40 years. The arbitrary definition of the male as the perpetrator lasted thousands of years.
Most (read: almost all) people still don't quite grok the concept that half the time sex is actually the female participant's idea, and thus, half the time that it is not consensual it was actually the man who did not consent. Male rape victims are not taken seriously if/when they try to even report the crime, and in most cases they don't even realize they are rape victims because they do not know they can be. So they hardly ever make it to court.
Granted, we don't really grok this concept during sex either.
***spoiler alert for very uncomfortable truth about sex***
When most men are raped, they do not experience it as rape because they are blissfully unaware of the concept. What they actually experience is bad sex that they feel they are consenting to only because they do not know they have the option to say no.
The female participant does not know she is committing rape because she does not know such a thing is possible, either. What she experiences is good sex with a man who does not call her back the next day.
Unless you are red pill. In which case you realize you are being raped but know you cannot report it. Sorry if that kinda ruins casual sex and perhaps even a lot of marital sex.
***End spoiler alert.***
[–]-discuss- 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
In my opinion a lot of the topics raised above are very complicated topics and do little to show that sexism against men is more prevalent than the majority of society seems to think.
Try looking up stats for fatalities in the workplace by gender, or suicide rates by gender, or custody by gender.
[–]GhostBunny667 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Honestly it isn't hard to see the sexism and double standards , even just in the media, the way that it seems entirely fine for women to blatantly sexualize men or crassly flirt with them, in awkward situations where there may be a power dynamic, without it raising any eyebrows at all. Fatalities in the work place isn't too surprising. It seems there are far more men working the more dangerous jobs. The family court system is something that really bothers me with its biased and hits a little close to home lol I tend to get pretty heated talking about that one.
[–]-discuss- 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
the way that it seems entirely fine for women to blatantly sexualize men or crassly flirt with them
People are also quite sexist about whether it's okay to shame people for all sorts of different reasons (including sexual), I personally consider those folks worse than those who are sexist about sexualising people.
Fatalities in the work place isn't too surprising. It seems there are far more men working the more dangerous jobs.
Absolutely, but what happened to people jumping up and down about equal representation of sexes across different workplaces? I'm pretty sure that's only for desirable jobs (eg. high paying and/or come with lots of power, authority over others etc.) but if you try to point that out it's often censored and people refuse to discuss these topics.
Also my experience online (especially in the popular subreddits for example) is that people can be quite sexist about assuming one gender is typically right and needs to be proven wrong whereas assumes the other gender is typically wrong and needs to be proven right. That combined with a huge lack of inequalities relating to some groups not receiving any attention at any point and being censored when it is brought up can be quite detrimental to people who fall victim to inequalities.
I would love to find a community of people who oppose all forms of sexism/racism etc., discuss topics thoroughly, allow people to ask questions (including follow up questions or clarification), use logically valid arguments, mathematics, statistics etc. etc.. I know of no such community anywhere unfortunately.
[–]79johnsmith 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
who say they want to learn but actually just think they have a logic trap to prove us wrong or hypocritical if they can get us to say something
Here's something for them to jump on then (sources in brackets):
"Women don't belong in men's spaces! Women are evil!" (https://images.app.goo.gl/V6movJF9ibz8ofRX7)
"Why I hate women, and I admit it!" (http://archive.is/E7CHI)
"Take away white women's voting rights!" (http://archive.is/1TMpN)
"Kill all women!" (https://images.app.goo.gl/iteRv2WDwBgGyv4HA)
"Kill all women and also kill female babies!" (http://archive.is/IZzpX)
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Hahah I did end up clicking the other links to confirm they would be like the first, but I did immediately write most of them off to be extreme incel type group threads, and not what I have seen most MRM to be representing. Radical feminism is horrifying 😅
The only one that interested me on a real level was the not belonging in a certain space, because that was a real initial concern of mine before joining this sub.
[–]79johnsmith 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your participation is valued. Please help to spread awareness of men's issues and discrimination by writing to your elected representatives and to the press.
[–]omniversalvoid 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I am not too sure about teachers marking men lower, seems like a stretch Pretty sure the grade gap is just from the school system being optimized towards females as literally every teacher is a girl Therefore it’s more conducive to girls studying more
[–]Dunkolunko 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, there was a study on it. Marked lower for identical work depending on the name being male, female or absent.
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Welcome!
Are there any men's issues that particularly concern you?
If you haven't, I highly recommend you watch Cassie Jaye's documentary film The Red Pill (which you can get for free on YouTube and Amazon Prime). It's a very nice primer to the Men's Human Rights Movement.
[–]GhostBunny667 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Thanks for the recommendation!
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Does that mean you're going to watch it? ;-)
I apologize if this seems unfair, but I wish I had $1 for every "feminist" who has visited this subreddit to "learn," only to end up being entirely closed minded, and wasting people's time who mistook the person for being here in good faith.
I do plan on watching it. You're the second or third person to recommend it, I look forward to it. I don't think being unsuccessful in changing someone's views is necessarily a waste of time. I'm not going to say that im going to agree with every argument or view point by any means. But nothing gets accomplished by willful ignorance. And to me a lot of the issues men face are human rights issues that are swept under the rug constantly.
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's absolutely fair. I would never ask that you agree with everything in advance. I ask only that you have an open mind, which I think yours is. Has anyone recommended this brief talk that she gave about the making of the film to you yet? You may find this context illuminating (and it's pretty short). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY
Thank you for visiting! I hope you stay and become a regular face around this community.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hey. I’m a fellow woman who also got interested in the movement. Glad to see you here.
[–]Railnites02 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And remember, the stupid question is one that wasn't asked
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Have any of you been pressured into showing more feeling, or opening up/ being more vulnerable with a partner, and had that backfire on you ?
[–]Dunkolunko 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, if my problem was with my ex at all she would get really mad. She was depressed and emotionally abusive.
[–]GhostBunny667 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've heard female friends complain about how closed off their partners off emotionally , and then later disparage them for being weak or in need of stepping up or manning up when they do voice their feelings or dare to show them.
[–]GhostBunny667 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
My wife, no. Other women in my life, yes.
Many women approach men as though we are broken or defective women, instead of appreciating that we are simply different. As you pointed out, many women both claim to want men to "open up," and then react in horror and revulsion when men do. I believe this stems from such an attitude towards men as defective women ("his emotions aren't the ones I want him to feel").
I'm not sure I agree. I think it more stems from a lot of women thinking they are far more progressive than they actually are. I think a lot of women hold on to pretty old school ideas of gender roles, even if they like to pretend that isn't the case.
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can assure you, many women absolutely view and treat men as defective women. That isn't something that's up for debate. In fact, the way that boys are drugged through the school system is due to their behaviors being viewed as inappropriate when compared to their female peers. (Imagine if little girls were instead given stimulants at school to make them artificially less docile and more like their properly-behaving male peers.)
[–]L0SERlambda 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Welcome! I'm probably not the best person to ask, and that's fine. Just welcome!
[–]Metraxis 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
A few things to know when reading here:
The term feminism is used here to describe the Dworkin/Daly/Koss/Solanas-inspired hate machine. The people who take their inspiration from these authors identify themselves as feminists, and are the most well-funded and well-connected (powerful) group of people who do so. Feminism is therefore, de facto, what these people _do_. You can expect arguments claiming that these are fringe elements or that feminism is about equality for everyone to fall on ears so jaded as to be deaf, both from repetition and from many community members' personal experiences.
It is generally viewed as unacceptable to make moral or value judgments about people based on genetic characteristics. When that genetic characteristic is sex, we call it sexism for short A judgment that relies on sex is sexist, the person who makes such judgments habitually is a sexist. These are abbreviated terms with specific meanings The claim that an act or person cannot be sexist because of some power relationship that exists between groups to which the people involved belong will not attract a ban, but will raise the question of whether the claimant is actually evil or merely stupid, since the behavior remains equally unacceptable regardless of vocabulary.
As long as a group or movement continues to take the idea of patriarchy as an axiom, there can be no useful dialog. The axiom changes a political ideology into a religion. Fighting a theoretical patriarchy when its existence cannot be questioned is like trying to end poverty when poverty is defined as the low quartile of the population by income. The definition itself makes a 'win' impossible.
Finally, for good or ill, the process and practice of masculinity is and always has been in large part defined by the way that heterosexual women react to heterosexual male behavior. If you want to know why, after half a century of 'fighting gender stereotypes', the modern man still won't open up emotionally, you need look no farther than the nearest "Male Tears" mug. If you want to know why so many men seem to be laser-focused on coitus to the exclusion of more ethereal relationship aspects, look at the derision and vitriol heaped on anyone who appears to be disinclined or unsuccessful. Men as a group, do these things because women, as a group, demand it of them, and all the pearl-clutching op-eds in the world will not change that. If the problem of toxic standards is to be solved in a lecture hall, then it needs to be a lecture hall full of girls.
[–]GhostBunny667 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
By saying this lecture hall should be full exclusively of girls, does this mean you don't believe that there are different but similar standards put on to women ?
And I fully agree that it's absurd saying that sexism Cannot exist because of assumed power dynamics. I've never heard anyone hold that view point , but I suppose it's not all that surprising either.
[–]Metraxis 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No. It means I was discussing masculinity. I don't believe that the major underpinnings of modern society can actually be changed in a lecture hall. I do believe that telling men they are bad and need to act differently is utterly pointless if the base-level reward system that spawned the current behaviors remains unchanged.
That said, I'm sure you will have heard the "power + prejudice" argument in the academic world, at least.
[–]GhostBunny667 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ahh okay. Thanks for clarifying :)
[–]shit-zen-giggles 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Hi and welcome,
you might get a lot of information from Cassie Jaye's documentary the red pill.
Cassie has also published the full raw interviews that are the basis of the movie on her youtube channel for free.
Aside from that great intro, you might want to check out the frequently asked questions page of this sub's wiki (as well as other pages therein).
And of course you're welcome to ask any questions directly as well.
One thing might greatly improve your experience:
When you post questions try to avoid phrases and expressions that come from feminist theory (patriachy, priviledge, gender, ally, rape culture, toxic masculinity, ...). Many people here will sink their teeth into these phrases and disprove them, rather than answering your questions.
[–]GhostBunny667 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
How do terms like gender and ally come from fem theory ? And toxic masculinity is a term that actually originates from a men's movement in the 80s, but does seem to reflect something different now..
[–]shit-zen-giggles 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How do terms like gender and ally come from fem theory ?
Seriously? you have heard of Judith Buttler, have you?
With respect to ally: Allyship is a concept that originated from intersectional feminism.
Those men's groups in the 80s (mythopoetic mens movement) were essentially male feminist groups. They based their work extensively on the feminist "critique" of masculinity.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Dunkolunko 19 points20 points21 points
(15 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 8 points9 points10 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]79johnsmith 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dunkolunko 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]79johnsmith 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ApprehensiveMail8 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]-discuss- 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]-discuss- 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]79johnsmith 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]79johnsmith 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omniversalvoid 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dunkolunko 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Railnites02 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dunkolunko 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]L0SERlambda 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Metraxis 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Metraxis 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shit-zen-giggles 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GhostBunny667 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]shit-zen-giggles 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link