"Bluepilled" men are chivalrous to women just because they are women, genuinely believe that the only reason they were able to get laid or will be able to get laid in the future is because of their personality, and believe that misfortune in dating is generally due to poor attitude or misogyny.
Oh, by the way, they tend to verbalize that women are no different from men and that they should be treated equally in all contexts, which is a hypocritical attitude at best because if you look at their actions and not their words, they heavily pedestalize women with chivalry, preemptive tokens of affection (sometimes parasocially, as in donating to twitch streamers), and extreme leniency in ways they generally would not proffer to other men.
"Redpilled" men buy books on how to run game, go to PUA camps, work out (taking steroids if they are extreme redpillers), practice "game" and manipulation tactics, try to become more stereotypically masculine, try to become wealthy quickly, and believe that misfortune in dating is generally due to lack of proficiency in redpill skills.
Oh, by the way, apparently none of this behavior is for women but is instead geared towards "self-improvement," which is a hypocritical attitude at best because if you look at their actions and not their words, redpillers are also pedestalizing women via their "self-improvement" and "masculinity," though they vehemently claim not to.
Are blackpillers more neutral or androcentric in their behaviors?
Since blackpillers seem to be much more loosely organized than redpillers and bluepillers in terms of worldview, political leanings, and beliefs, I can't say for sure.
However, when I was active in pill spaces, I noticed that women would sometimes join blackpill forums/servers, and they would still get flooded with thirsty DMs.
These DMs were indeed from blackpillers, who would jockey for the woman’s attention by throwing each other under the bus, even if the said woman explicitly verbalized that she was a “chad chaser.”
I'll probably have to do some research about whether or not simping is biological.
[–]fatsackguy47 6 points7 points8 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]fatsackguy47 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diligent_Divide_4978[S] -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]fatsackguy47 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diligent_Divide_4978[S] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]fatsackguy47 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diligent_Divide_4978[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zastale 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tengo_harambe 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diligent_Divide_4978[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]tengo_harambe -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]zastale 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NotARussianBot1984 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MiasmicSector 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Affinity4186 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]monkeyballs92 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link