~ archived since 2018 ~

Kevin Samuels is likely the best advocate I’ve ever seen for men in my lifetime. Watch this man when you are feeling down.

ConflictedRebl · 2023-07-17T13:41:03+00:00

Kevin Samuels first best advocate for men...

ConflictedRebl

July 17, 2023

86 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Kevin Samuels is likely the best advocate I’ve ever seen for men in my lifetime. Watch this man when you are feeling down.
Author	ConflictedRebl
Upvotes	86
Comments	31
Date	July 17, 2023 1:41 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1522b57/kevin_samuels_is_likely_the_best_advocate_ive/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/kevin-samuels-is-likely-the-best-advocate-ive-ever.1225544 https://theredarchive.com/post/1225544

Comments

[–]Mobile_Lumpy 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ConflictedRebl[S] 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]End-Gynocentrism 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+]First-Ad-4314 -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ConflictedRebl[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]LazerDaighzer 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]GreatBayTemple 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Minute_Ad_1494 -12 points-11 points-10 points 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

[–]ConflictedRebl[S] 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

[–]D_Luffy_32 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

I don’t remember the study that put it that way.

The first study I found with google roughly agrees with just a different angle.

If men aren't sexually satisfied (for instance, if their spouse declines sex often), they take that rejection to heart, and it can easily translate to feeling "unloved." In fact, men are more likely than women to cheat due to a feeling of insecurity.

When women cheat, they're often trying to fill an emotional void.4 Women frequently complain of disconnection from a spouse, and of the wish to be desired and cherished. Women are more likely to feel unappreciated or ignored, and seek the emotional intimacy of an extramarital relationship.

An affair is more often a "transitional" partner for the woman…

So if a man is feeling sexually neglected and an opportunity arises, I infidelity is more likely than if those favors are absent.

Imagine if the genders were reversed. If a man complained that his wife cheated on him, and a woman said "well you're fat" or "what's your dick size"

This is fair and is often a helpful exercise. You seem to think I’m defending men cheating. I am not. It is wrong. It is wrong when women do it. It is wrong when men do it.

claimed a man cheated on her and he responded by asking for her Weight and dress size

It wasn't a reaction to her saying this. He asked these questions to every woman who called in.

He was not trying to be a couple’s counselor where the audience is one or both partners. His audience was the larger African American community trying to tackle things like entitlement in women and driftlessness in men.

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The study that you're referencing doesn't say that men cheat more if they have more options.

Every man has the option to cheat. Even if he's unattractive, there are cam models, prostitutes, dirty chat websites, etc etc.

And I know that you're not defending cheaters, I'm sorry I wasn't trying to accuse you of that, but I am trying to say why I disagree with Kevin samuels. Here is his whole video:

https://eurweb.com/2021/unnecessary-roughness-kevin-samuels-tells-woman-to-accept-cheating-because-youre-built-like-emmitt-smith-video/

He essentially believes that men who cheat are "high value", and that women should just accept that if their husband is attractive or rich then he will cheat on them, because it's supposedly "in their nature"

I think this is very harmful to both men and women. He is essentially teaching women the misandrist belief that "men are only as faithful as their options" and that all men are perverts who try to sleep around as much as possible.

And simultaneously he is teaching young boys/men that they will be more valuable if they cheat on their wives.

It's an awful message for everyody

[–]WhereProgressIsMade -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Why don't you make an actual argument against what I'm saying?

I did here:

I took it to be a warning to women that if you want a man with options, there is the risk the temptation of infidelity could get to him. If that bothers you, two strategies to reduce that risk are to stay fit and keep him satisfied or else aim lower. Guys without many options will have a lower risk in that regard.

This was my attempt to summarize where KS seemed to be coming from based on about 10-20 of hours I watched. It certainly is not a perfect summary but seemed to roughly what he seemed to be trying to get at.

You brushed it off here:

But no, that's not what he said

preferring to focus on the clip you found.

I would discuss KS with you more, but it’s hard to do with someone who admits to not being very familiar with his material.

[–]Correct-Reporter1872 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Correct-Reporter1872 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]answering-the-call 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Correct-Reporter1872 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]frankieche 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Correct-Reporter1872 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Minute_Ad_1494 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]First-Ad-4314 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link