https://www.pulsesports.ng/sports-gist/story/charlotte-powdrell-9-reasons-why-israel-adesanya-may-be-forced-to-share-wealth-with-ex-girlfriend-2023051612345322107

Is this just me. If men pays women shouldn't that be explicit? Shouldn't they negotiate how much she is getting and how much he is paying in the beginning of relationship?

We have this weird laws telling how much men have to pay women. Child support. Alimony. Palimony. But somehow the women are not supposed to consider it because the amount is not clear at the beginning of the relationship.

It's as if the purpose is to prevent rich men from getting women so women pick someone poor instead increasing poverty.

What an inefficient trade

They are both adult. She wants money. He wants sex. Negotiate a price.

Not happening to me. I am not paying alimony. I paid a lot to lawyers once and I hate government imposed fucked up deals instead of more explicit ones I make.

Sure lots of money I spend on my women are there because I feel like it.

But I think women should consider that as payment anyway. It's not something they get if they choose someone much poorer than I am and not something they get from me if they don't choose me.

When transaction is explicit the message is clear in the beginning. Choose someone poor and she is fucked. Choose someone rich she gets more. Up to women to decide which one worth humping.

If she wants to consider the money or not it's up to them. But women deserve to know that in the beginning of relationship. Not after the relationship ends and some judges decide that based on absurd laws.

There goes poor children with poor father without government spending a dime on welfare.