TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

It's crazy how feminists must always find loophole ways for men to give women special treatment. Somehow men being mean to both men and women is still sexism. And I bet they don't care about women that are mean too.

vegetables-10000

November 1, 2024
66 upvotes
/r/EverydayMisandry

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/can-rudeness-hide-sexism

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title It's crazy how feminists must always find loophole ways for men to give women special treatment. Somehow men being mean to both men and women is still sexism. And I bet they don't care about women that are mean too.
Author

vegetables-10000

Upvotes 66
Comments 6
Date November 1, 2024 3:50 PM UTC
(1 year ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/EverydayMisandry
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1gh8ljg/its_crazy_how_feminists_must_always_find_loophole/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/its-crazy-how-feminists-must-always-find-loophole.1534108
https://theredarchive.com/post/1534108
Red Pill terms in post
feminist
Top posts by vegetables-10000

The left is beginning to rethink the "believe all women" phrase.

302 upvotes
February 24, 2025
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The phrase "men were the ones who created patriarchy" is just a deflection from pointing out their Cakism and hypocrisy when it comes to male gender roles.

283 upvotes
May 16, 2025
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

My "the convenience of not all men " theory is proven in these screenshots.

274 upvotes
March 13, 2025
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

There is a narrative to paint all men who are cautious around women, as paranoid Incels with victim complexes.

266 upvotes
January 27, 2025
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The double speak of "men must create their own movements".

238 upvotes
January 5, 2025
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The paradox of the male loneliness epidemic.

211 upvotes
July 14, 2025
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The hatred for both male celibacy and men use of porn is a Venn diagram. And that is because society hates male neutrality towards women more than anything.

209 upvotes
December 18, 2024
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Another shaming single men post.

193 upvotes
January 24, 2025
/r/EverydayMisandry

Comments

[–]NonbinaryYolo 24 points25 points26 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Notice they're only talking about men being sexist? Where's the data about rude women?

[–]vegetables-10000[S] 17 points18 points19 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What is happening here. Is that feminists ironically don't like equality lol.

These men are probably just treating women like equals or human beings. So feminists are calling labelling these men "rude sexists" for treating women like equals. How ironic.

A lot of feminists or women prefer benevolent sexism. Where men treat them like children they have to take care of, by men opening doors for women, helping women pick up stuff, men offering their seats to women, and giving women free stuff.

In this ass backwards world. Men treating women like equals is considered hostile sexism. And men treating women like lesser people is considered progressive and feminist. Again the irony.

[–]SlyFoxWaifu2064 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."

Also, I've SEEN feminists talk endlessly about how much they hate it when a guy is "too nice", how it's "creepy" and such to be "put on a pedestal", and they "just want to be treated like equals". Now that they're experiencing a taste of the same unkindness they always offer men, they suddenly don't like it? Give me a fucking break...

[–]Minimum-Force-1476 11 points12 points13 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"The authors of the recent study define sexism as “attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors that reflect, foster, or promote negative or pejorative stereotypes about women.”"

Well, here you have it. They just pulled an unscientific definition of sexism out of their asses and ran with it. It's just fucked up that clearly biased "studies" like this even get published 

[–]Every_Emu_4646 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is what normal people are talking about when they say that academia is untrustworthy, by the way. The institutions are infiltrated and overrun by leftist morons and feminists, at which point they can define words and rewrite textbooks to support their dogshit theories on class conflict and systemic abuse.

[–]Minimum-Force-1476 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol what? This is pretty reductive. Academia isn't "overrun by leftists", rather it's established people propagating their own ideas. Especially everything in economics is run by pretty mainstream neoliberal people. Academia lives by setting up hypotheses that can be falsified. The issue is that in many social sciences, like economics, but also gender studies, have such complex settings that their hypothesis can't be falsified, making them unscientific by nature. This is also criticized within academia however, just not within a specific field, which is often leading to an echochamber. Like in economics where you have marxists critiquing the mainstream neoliberal theory, which is propagated by big business as it benefits their agenda. This is also true in "womens studies" for instance, that gets criticized by people from gender studies, or by intersectional people. The womens studies keep the dichotomy between men and women up and distract from the underlying issues that perpetuate gender inequality, which is in the interest of powerful institutions like the state, so it gets propagated more and the criticism is pushed to the sideline. 

So the conclusion is: the scientific method is holding up well in theory. But established powerdynamics (between rich and poor, established scientists and newcomers, institutions and individuals etc) are causing academia to often not be scientific. Especially in social sciences, which are as you said very constructed and subjective. Which is why you should first and foremost ask yourself: who benefits from propagating this position? 

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter