Feminists hate any conversation where women are given agency. Where all the woman has to do is say yes or no. Since their solution is "men should not rape".

But even then when there are solutions for what men can do. They still hate it though. Because the solutions are not convenient for women.

Feminists would literally push this narrative that men are autistic, socially awkward, or incels for not understanding vague non-verbal consent.

They still want to live this in world where women are expected to be coy, play hard to get, or act like they don't want want sex. While men are expected to be assertive, confident, and mind readers who can magically know what woman want without asking them. Men have to "convince" women to get sex from them. This is recipe for disaster. But again Feminists have no problem with this set-up, because it's convenient for women.

Another part of why Feminist are so pro non-verbaal consent, outside men having to do all of the work. I think it's because non-verbal consent leaves more room for women to feel pressure, manipulated, or coerced into having sex with men in the future. Whenever they want to use excuses after having regrets about having sex with men. Since they never use their words to consent, and the man had to guess with this dumb and cat and mouse game in society.

I call this female regret. A lot of false allegations are caused by regrets, rather than women having evil intentions to falsely accused. So after feeling regrets. A woman can say she was coerced into having sex with manipulative man. When men are too forward with consent, this doesn't allowed this situation to happen. Hence why they are so against men being too forward with consent.

In conclusion. This is going to be a tough battle with consent. Because even if we go by their feminist rules, that is still a problem for them.