Do you feel either of these are real? I feel male privilege is definitely not and is just more misandrist slander and another way they like to play victim and deflect from male issues. They often cite it as an example of men not fearing for their safety when out and about (blatantly untrue, men are just as vulnerable as women and can be and have been attacked by both women and other men alike). There's so many examples of it not being true. Among several being men having to register for the draft and can be arrested for failing/refusing to do so. "Believe women" which completely disregards due process for any accused male who's been potentially falsely accused. Subjects like domestic violence/abuse, rape, sexual assault/harassment, human trafficking, etc. still largely made out to only affect female victims and not male ones and it always assumed the offenders are male. Almost no shelters that recognize or help male abuse victims/survivors. And of course there's how incredibly misandrist courts and schools are towards men/boys, and the education system in particular being incredibly anti-male. Among scores of other examples. There's certainly much more evidence for female privilege being real for sure, especially in regards to never having to register for the draft and always being believed when making accusations.

"Male privilege" is another nonsensical term that's overdue to be stricken from the public lexicon. I feel one ceases to have credability or integrity of any sort whenever they employ it. It's one of the more infuriating and outright irritating terms to see misandrists often using.