Just saw one of these discrimination “report cards” and the scoring is absurd.

If a company’s hiring skews toward women, it gets 4/4 stars and a nice green label, because discriminating against men is obviously good! If it skews toward men, it gets 1/4 and a red label. Most of these firms also skew toward women!

This is what passes for serious analysis? Picking the “right” outcome first, then designing a metric to reward it?

Academia is waging war against men. If we do not question how these reports are built, we are letting someone else define what “fairness” means in a way that directly disadvantages men.

We can no longer let people drop “studies” or “data” claiming male privilege or female discrimination without meticulously examining them. Because if we do not start poking holes in weak methodology, we will drown in propaganda.

https://preview.redd.it/prlb9f2upuug1.png?width=1450&format=png&auto=webp&s=c5207a5307a48c9caae8ae176d56146709a49320

https://bfi.uchicago.edu/insight/research-summary/a-discrimination-report-card/