Alberta RCMP officer accused of sexual assault pleads guilty to common assault on teen boys

BEEZY086 · 2026-05-20T03:33:42+00:00

"As part of the plea on Tuesday, Const. Bridget Morla admitted to inappropriately touching the two teenagers in an Airdrie, Alta., hotel room in 2022..... Morla has been found guilty but will not have a criminal conviction on her record."

Fuck double standards, we got triple standards these days.

Police officers and women clearly get punished to a lesser extent So when we have a female police officer they get triple standards. If this was a regular dude, he'd be in prison. But here we are with a lady that molested kids in 2022 and hasn't even lost her job yet....

SarcasticallyCandour · 2026-05-20T03:39:24+00:00

How tf can someone be found guilty of s crime and not have a criminal conviction on their record. What kind of Canadian cuckery is this shit?

Robot_Alchemist · 2026-05-20T06:07:40+00:00

It’s an unfortunate name for that crime “common assault”

Suspicious_Form6653 · 2026-05-20T04:13:08+00:00

Pleading guilty is not having regrets. The judicial system should know its responsibilities before forgiving lightly.

MentallyMercurial · 2026-05-20T12:05:57+00:00

I wonder how much the boys were bought or had their silence threatened for. Especially seeing she is a Canadian version of the feds. They didn't say anything went wrong because they were pressured. Just like I was.

Future-Stretch-401 · 2026-05-20T07:09:58+00:00

Not that I agree with this, but I can see why the prosecutor would have difficulty getting a conviction on the original charges. It would be completely legal for her to have sex with the 17 yo in Canada as long as he consented. She wasn’t on duty, acting as a coach, chaperone or other position of authority and there’s no age difference restriction. What she actually did was put her hand under his waistband, and since the boy wont testify that he objected or didnt consent the prosecutor has no case for any charge regarding that boy.

The other boys age isn’t stated but since the team seems to have been at the Midget level that means he would almost certainly be 16 or 17. So again the case relies on his consent. All agreed she touched his shoulder and thigh but this is itself not a sexual assault, it would need to be proved that she intended the touch in a sexual way. Otherwise it’s a simple assault. The entire case then revolves around whether she also touched his groin. The boy never claimed that, only that he didn’t want her touching his thigh. She admits to an “accidental “ touch to the groin, which still makes it simple assault. So on this second boy there’s no one to give evidence in a trial establishing sexual assault.

So you can see that the likely situation here is that the prosecutor overcharges initially because they are getting criticized for taking it easy on the police. She tries for a long time to get a witness to give the testimony they need for a conviction but can’t get it. Then she sees the complete disaster where prosecutors overcharged 5 young hockey players in Ontario, that case falls apart and the judge is so savage the prosecutors careers are in the shitter. And that’s how we end up in the current situation.

Is this bias by the Canadian court system? Well just in the hockey world we have the Barrie Colts case involving a 16yo girl. Sexual assault charges dropped. Various cases of OHL players most resulting in dropped charges and no convictions. An employer who repeatedly touched his female employees back and upper thigh, convicted on simple assault not sexual assault. Police officer William Pound groomed a 15 yo girl continued until she was 20, never charged although he eventually lost a civil case. Sgt Ken Price , repeated sexual touching and speech towards a woman he was training, acquitted even though the judge deciding the case believed those events happened. Just this year another RCMP officer caught in a sting operation luring a child for sex, acquitted because the people running the sting were not police officers. And let’s not forget the majority of sexual assault trials in Canada don’t end up in convictions.

So no, this isn’t bias and were the sexes reserved it’s likely the outcome would be the same.

Organic-Mud-8728 · 2026-05-21T23:07:14+00:00

So nothing happens?

Argentarius1 · 2026-05-20T07:18:42+00:00

Had to be Alberta. No way the rest of Canada would get that right.

Title	Alberta RCMP officer accused of sexual assault pleads guilty to common assault on teen boys
Author	BEEZY086
Upvotes	112
Comments	11
Date	May 20, 2026 3:32 AM UTC (2 months ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ti9q4l/alberta_rcmp_officer_accused_of_sexual_assault/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/alberta-rcmp-officer-accused-of-sexual-assault.1580790 https://theredarchive.com/post/1580790

Comments