The article even states, in the author's own words:

"The Beta male is a 'catch' because he is programmed for partnership” Dr Rhodes tells Life & Style. “He is highly desirable to women who want to share the responsibilities of having a family and working with a supportive, caring man. The Beta male is so secure he is not threatened by the Alpha woman. He will support and respect his partner and care about what is important to her. I think this is pretty terrific.”

For those that know me here, i'm always on a rant about how hypergamous and overall terrible my hometown of Sydney, Australia is when it comes to dating. I've been keeping a a database on articles i come across. Yes it's that bad here that the press even publish articles on it, usually written by women no less.

That said, i post this here as Australia is awfully close culturally to the USA (where i currently live), and is also a part of the rampant third wave feminism where 'women are Kings!' but whine about everything else.

Article is here.

Takeaways:

Dr Rhodes, a relationship expert with 30 years' experience, considered why these “new Alpha women”, were failing to find someome to share their lives with. She concluded that instead of looking for a man as successful as themselves, they should reject an Alpha man in favour of their “dependable, responsible, and supportive” Beta opposite — a man who “might just make the best fit” she says.

Gotta lock in the beta bucks whilst searching for the alpha!

There's a goldmine of Red Pill behavior enforcement throughout this article that i'll probably quote the entire thing. But i will let you guys digest it for discussion.

Thoughts?