699,178 posts

Will Being A Misogynist Help You Get Laid?

Reddit View
January 7, 2013
6 upvotes
http://www.returnofkings.com/2247/will-being-a-misogynist-help-you-get-laid


Post Information
Title Will Being A Misogynist Help You Get Laid?
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 6
Comments 20
Date 07 January 2013 04:18 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/174812
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/164ia4/will_being_a_misogynist_help_you_get_laid/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–]RedHonest4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

Don't know, I think there is some confusion of terms here:

  • misogyny - the hatred of women.
  • chauvinism - the belief that men are higher or more important than women.
  • sexism - the belief that there are essential differences between the sexes (trying to take back this term).

For what it's worth, I consider myself chauvinist, sexist, but not misogynist.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I agree with this breakdown. That said, as was discussed in another thread, being a bad boy (but not really alpha) will get you laid. Being a misogynist (not just chauvisnist) will also get you laid.

I prefer to be neither the bad boy nor misogynist. But you can see how they both emulate their counter-parts and grant at least some level of success.

[–]RedHonest1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah. The question here is the influence between "your attitude towards women" and "your success with women." What we're slowly starting to discover is, not only is having a negative attitude towards women not, on it's own, going to leave you with your hand on your dick; but it can even improve your game.

My evidence: Hearing about too many long, abusive relationships. Seriously, if anyone needs a red pill kick in the ass, start learning about these abusive relationships that these women get into, and how they keep going back.

And then watch the break ups that are going on around you, the ones that stick, what happened? He forgot her birthday, or was annoying, or irritating, or more commonly, she forgot about him after some other guy stole her heart.

Something about supplicating nice guys...not misogynists!

[–]zionController1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree. But the public perception of a misogynist doesn't even need the word hate. Its anything, anything at all, that isn't 100% perfectly kosher. There are those who would call a man a misogynist because he doesn't sit down to pee.

I think the actual content of the article by definition is more chauvinism and sexism, but the current title is more widely recognized by a broader audience and it drives a more powerful message.

[–]TRP Vanguardlegendofpasta4 points5 points  (13 children) | Copy

Hallelujah!! Someone else who thinks like I do!!!!

I've never inspired such passion or loyalty in a women until I started openly and seriously pressing these matters.

Tell her: If she gets fat, you will leave her.

You support the loss of her voting privileges (once states repeal the 19th Amendment.)

Her career and college degree do not impress you.

You do not care where she has traveled.

And then:

Insist that she cook and clean for you.

Make her buy you food and do your laundry.

Insist that she be available to you sexually at all times.

All of these things have given me the relationship I've always wanted. The one my grandfather had, except mine is with a modern woman, which comes with its own brand of flaws and baggage.... But you can make it work through cheerful misogyny.

The one thing in the article I question is this: Why insist that she buy the food? I insist she cook it and clean up after, and praise her for being a good woman when she's done. But I typically buy the food. My argument was leveraged as this: You can either go back to your own apartment where you will buy everything, cook everything and clean everything, or you can stay here and cook everything and clean everything and I'll cover the grocery bill. It might not be the best case scenario, but it still gets me out of the kitchen and back to my guitar, circuitry, lockpicking, gym, whatever my positive masculinity desires... What is your take on this?

Perfect red pill material! Top drawer! 10/10, would read again

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

i hope you take the precaution of keeping her away from her female friends. the more 'ladies's nights' they go to, the worse their decisions get. women seem to deeply want one another to be miserable, then get shitfaced and cry and tell each other they're beautiful no matter how fat and hateful and toxic they are.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I've always maintained that when women get together, you take their average IQ and divide by the number of women who are present to arrive at their individual IQs. It can only go downhill. And worse, if you tolerate their inane bullshit, they lose respect for you. It's lose-lose.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

My hypothesis on gestalt vaginal evil is quite similar. When any gathering of women agglomerates, they will, within a short time (accelerated by intake of cosmopolitans and margaritas), all rapidly assume the Ve (vaginal evil) quotient of the nastiest (and always unhappiest) female present, also known as the 'queen bitch'.

When the Ve values of the group have synchronized, (indicated by mindless cackling and smoking), the Queen Bitch will have assumed psychic command of the hive unit. The subordinate females will be given commands such as 'cheat on your boyfriend with a black guy', 'let's all go see magic mike', 'stop going to the gym for him, you're beautiful', and of course 'you deserve better than him'.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool[S,M] 3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

As a moderator of this subreddit, here's my take:

Giving voting rights to women gave them a much larger say in our economic policies than they had actually produced in our economy (Representation without taxation). I feel that this, the destruction of marriage, and a few other feminist things have given rise to our current economic predicament. (as well as global issues and minimum wage, but that's another subreddit).

Women gaining the right to vote was inevitable, and I support it. I do believe in equal rights to the extent that all humans deserve the same legal opportunity to pursue their own happiness.

Would life be easier today if they didn't? Yes. But that's neither here nor there.

Here's the irony of the feminine imperative. They pushed for these rights- and white knight men fought along side. In fact, it was easy to eventually get voting rights for women, because nobody could think of a good argument against it. We all allowed it to happen. But the irony is- and this is the red pill- that what women say and what women do are vastly different.

At no point would I actually vote for removing voting rights. But if I said I was in favor of removing these rights, you'd be damned sure women would paradoxically gain more respect for me. Blame women for that stupid bit.

So I hope this clears up the issue for you. We also do not condone rape, but explain to me why women have rape fantasies?

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy

From a blue pill perspective, we all look terribly cynical and sad, don't we? We look filled to the brim with hatred and appear to look unhappy and unfulfilled. This is not an uncommon sentiment, so don't feel alone in thinking this.

It isn't until you embrace the viewpoint that a new level of satisfaction comes over you.

Of course it's us vs them. It's mating, which is strategical. You've heard the quote "all is fair in love and war." There's a reason love and war are grouped together. Because both are battles of strategy.

Once you remove the morality of decisions that men and women make in mating, you can reveal that what we're talking about isn't negative. Instead, it's neutral. In fact- if you're worried about the red pill, consider this: The blue pill nice guys were our natural state. We literally only embrace this behavior because it is WOMEN who enforce that this behavior be the only one that works!

How backwards is that?

I don't consider the views cynical, but there was a time in my life that I most certainly would've considered these views negative and cynical.

Now I see it for what it is. Neither negative nor positive. Just strategy, and reality.

Women won't think twice (or even once) about throwing shit tests your way and luring you into beta orbiter status for their own gratification and validation. They have no problem embracing their sexual strategy. Why should we be concerned with how our sexual strategy "appears" if they don't! That seems to give them quite the upper hand if we do!

Again, I'm not demonizing the fact that they do it. Instead, I recognize it and use this information to my advantage.

Again, I am not in favor of repealing women's voting rights. I'm merely pointing out that women will counter-intuitively respond with vagina tingles if you happen to maintain that view.

[–]Desmadre2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women won't think twice (or even once) about throwing shit tests your way and luring you into beta orbiter status for their own gratification and validation. They have no problem embracing their sexual strategy. Why should we be concerned with how our sexual strategy "appears" if they don't! That seems to give them quite the upper hand if we do!

Great fucking information here dude. I am currently trying to get my close friends into this type of thinking but they are REJECTING it as much as he can. But then again he is the definition of a blue pill. All of his relationships with girls have been LJBF ones and he thinks the perfect girl from him is around the corner (thats what all the girls who keep him in beta orbit tell him anyways). So thanks for this comment I will use it.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Definitely stick around. If you feel yourself fighting the new information in your head, that's perfectly natural. Same happened for me. Just read the rationales and discussions with an open mind. A great place to get yourself into the right mind-frame is Rollo's blog- http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/ He spends a lot less time speculating and a lot more time giving solid rational reason for some of the more popular views in the manosphere. It's absolutely solid logic there.

Eventually, some of the farther out things start to make sense, some things click, and some of it might just be terrible- but that's why we have discussion. Never be afraid to ask- there are a lot of knowledgeable people here.

[–]zionController1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I personally support the repeal of women's voting rights. I used to work in a parliamentary office and whenever bills are being passed the Minister for the Status of Women always stands up and says "What will this bill do for women?? And virtually any bill has to basically cater to women. There is no Minister for the Status of Men, and no one asks if men will benefit or not from any particular law. Any bill that doesn't advance women in some way is considered less than just, and will not be made into legislation. Why? Because women vote for women. Thats the way the ACTUAL voting works. (EDIT: Men who don't vote for women are labelled misogynist which kills their political career, because: women vote for women)

Since I'm the only one here with actual 8 hour day 40 hours a week experience in the effects of women voting, I don't expect you to already be on board with me. But please consider the facts that little by little over the last century this has been happening in every legislative chamber in the US and Canada, and look at the destruction that lays in its wake: men get a raw deal in any DV dispute, any divorce, any custody battle, any job advertisement, any display of masculinty is 'officially' frowned upon, but secretly gives everyone gina tingles.

If I may quote the MAtrix on this one:

MORPHEUS: For the longest time, I wouldn't believe it. But then I saw the fields with my own eyes, watched them liquefy the dead so they could be fed intravenously to the living -

NEO (politely): Excuse me, please.

[–]Kepaso0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Not sure about that misogynist stuff. Not taking them seriously? Seeing their games and flaws? Thinking about before them? sure. But maybe it s the word misogynist itself that may be too harsh, it sounds to me like a hatred of women. But in the long term i'm certain that a misogynist will do better with women than an AFC or beta.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

If you want a deconstructionist argument, define hate. Watch how this argument spirals into meaninglessness.

[–]zionController0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Bingo.

This is one of the tougher realities for people to face. One of the best articles ever posted here and also one of the least popular (check the downvotes). Still, there are those who are ready to be unplugged who will bathe in sunshine because these articles are getting out. Great work.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I'd like to avoid the term misogyny. Just because feminists have abused the word, doesn't mean we should. It seems more like sexism to me. Which fits in with the red pill school of thought, because we recognize that the sexes are definitely different.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter