696,979 posts

Dalrock: Charlize Theron has us trapped.

Reddit View
April 19, 2019
18 upvotes
https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/04/17/charlize-theron-has-us-trapped/


Post Information
Title Dalrock: Charlize Theron has us trapped.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 18
Comments 20
Date 19 April 2019 02:08 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/235510
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/bezief/dalrock_charlize_theron_has_us_trapped/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
Dalrockthe red pill
Comments

[–]Porlock_Person26 points27 points  (4 children) | Copy

The part about the lack of male-only groups in our society is absolutely true.

Cultivating male friendships is something I don’t read a lot about on here, but I think it’s just as important for our wellbeing as all the sexual success strategies that dominate this board.

[–]thewrecker89 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

They're out there, the problem is very few young men gravitate towards them. And as a result they'll eventually die. Things like the Freemasons, Elks club, etc. Have pretty much all been male only organizations. In the up to about the 70s there have always been guys going to "the club" or "the lodge".

They were (are) fraternities or men gathering together sometimes to do work in their community other times to sit around drink a bit, play cards or pool, etc. There's plenty of old sit coms with guys taking about going "to the lodge". Often there's some outfit they are shown wearing when they go. But they were there, they still are. The problem is the guys that belonged to them when they were young men. Are now in their 70s and 80s. And there's very little if any young men coming in. Because it's not "cool" to do anymore. And what one or two guys that join want to go hang out with a room full of senior citizens? Plus, putting pussy on a pedestal became a thing at some point. Old timers worried more about getting out with the guys then spending the night with their wives. The men who created much of what's common today and built this world during the last 100 years weren't focused on going out and one date closing pussy. They focused on their work and when they were done they worried about pussy. There were clear roles then. Men went out and did their work then came home to a wife who cleaned the house and prepared a nice hot meal. But there needs to be either more young men getting involved in these clubs or they will disappear and then they'll be nothing.

[–]5Imperator_Red8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

College fraternities are under relentless attack. I don't see them surviving more than 10 years in their current form. They will use equal housing laws to force them accept women, or the colleges will just boot them off campus and they'll lose their legitimacy.

They focused on their work and when they were done they worried about pussy.

They didn't worry about pussy at all. They established a career, got married, and then were legally entitled to pussy.

[–]throwlaca4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The part about the lack of male-only groups in our society is absolutely true.

Try motorcycle clubs. They are not male-only but male dominated with very few women mingling in.

Tech and computer clubs are also mostly male but girls are idolized and mostly dominate all men there. Its a beta cesspool, do not go there.

[–]SquaatsForDays2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

There’s a catch-22 though, and that is when these younger males cultivate these groups they need to make sure the members of that group actually contribute to their well being and personal growth.

For example a lot of high schoolers nowadays have friends just to “have friends”, but half of them smoke weed and have no real life skills to contribute. I have a group of friends, but many of them are significantly older than myself and have a multitude of life experience to teach me. Bankers, entrepreneurs, businessmen, etc. they clearly offer something of value. “You are the sum of the 5 people you spend the most amount of time with”. Pick them wisely.

[–]5Imperator_Red17 points18 points  (2 children) | Copy

I’m shockingly available…I’ve made it very clear.”

She's available to actors, musicians, athletes, politicians, media personalities, and super-wealthy businessmen. The top 0.1% of men who can pick up 25 year old 9's anytime they want. WHAT IS THE PROBLEM???

[–]3Yakatonker9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

those reproductive optics

Yup, she's essentially a alpha widow by fact of her status. She'll likely just buy a fuck toy like the rest of her peers.

[–]UrgotMilk3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

"I'm old and have a kid, why aren't the best men interested????"

[–]theunconquored39 points40 points  (1 child) | Copy

He’s right, but I think he’s right about the wrong thing. Anyone who looks at culture and bemoans the state of affairs in society as a whole, will have no problem finding lots of things to be concerned with.

But you can’t fix culture. Very very few people can even have an impact on culture. What you can fix is what is inside your control. Namely, the actions you take, the thoughts you think, and where you put your attention.

If we continue to pay attention to people like Charlize Theron, and talk about all of the things that are glaringly wrong with her, we are giving her a platform from which to spread her ideas. Why is she worth one second of my time? Why am I paying any attention to her whatsoever?

If we want to fix culture, we have to fix ourselves. No one is coming. It’s up to you.

[–]Aggressive_Beta12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. Giving her attention, even if it’s negative, implies that her opinions are somehow important enough to be worth discussing. They’re not.

LAW 36 DISDAIN THINGS YOU CANNOT HAVE: IGNORING THEM IS THE BEST REVENGE

By acknowledging a petty problem you give it existence and credibility. The more attention you pay an enemy, the stronger you make him; and a small mistake is often made worse and more visible when you try to fix it. It is sometimes best to leave things alone. If there is something you want but cannot have, show contempt for it. The less interest you reveal, the more superior you seem.

[–]xoxuv15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Dressing a boy as a girl is sexual abuse of minors. She should be in jail. The child is going to be traumatized for life.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy

Charlize Theron amply demonstrates why women, particularly attractive women, need to be under the supervision and discipline of masculine men.

First, they're happier that way. Calmer minds, not stressed out, getting enough dick without becoming broken from excessive N-counts.

Second, a masculine man won't let them do STOOPID shit like dress a boy as a girl. And he would have pregged her up, proper, when she was younger, so she didn't have to adopt a couple of third world muppets, which is what Hollywood Cat Ladies do once their wombs raisin into desiccated husks.

There is so much soy running around that feminine women are thirsty for Masculine men. RP men should be cleaning up.

[–]throwlaca8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

This post reads like a misogynist prick but the thing is, all evidence points at you being completely right. Middle age women with kids and a husband are in general much, much happier than their lonely, cat-adopting counterparts. Life of 40-something single women is so disastrous that not even first-tier Hollywood actresses can escape from that terrible life.

[–]RightHandWolf13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

The takeaway I got from this article is that Ms. Theron is doing the classic Freudian projection. She has seemingly impossible standards, but doesn't connect her unrealistic standards with being "shockingly available." She hasn't trapped anybody but herself. Enjoy your dildos and boxed wine, Furiosa!

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Why does anyone care about this ugly degenerate spinster

[–]BluBlac597 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Single mother that dresses her young adopted son in girls clothes and tell the world he's trans. I call that a RED FLAG. Does she think that any normal man would want to invest himself with a woman that ADOPTS children and sexually abuses the boy ? I have read articles that the boy doesn't want to dress as a girl but she forces him to. She adopts children as a single woman to INTENTIONALLY become a single mother. Single mother rules apply here squared.

[–]throwlaca7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

>Shockingly available

It's shocking she don't realize she's 43.

[–]TheRedPillRipper4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

we are trapped inside the psychotic mind of modernism

How? We as men choose which frame we adopt. Just because society subscribes to certain views doesn’t mean I’m not going spear fishing with my nephews this week.

Yes this information could be useful to those who need it. If however you feel ”trapped” it’s not society’s issue; it’s your own. Fortifying your frame fortifies your freedom of choice.”

Godspeed and good luck!

[–]magx011 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh he/she/it understands gender at three even though gender is actually not even well defined as a concept (since it's supposed to be a reflection of brain states disengaged from physical sex or some shit)?

And this happens to be occurring in this current social climate that pushes this shit? And it's a boy becoming a girl (of course, never the other way around) in a "girls rule" climate?

But I'm just negative and whateverphobic.

EDIT: To the normie lurkers....ask yourself this, and be honest. How would that three year old have responded if instead of accepting what was said at face value the mother would have asked one simple follow up question: What's a boy? The kid's answer would be all you need to know if you're honest (hint: THEY HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA).



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter