If The Top 20% Became Average, Would Women Find More Men Desirable or Would They Still Only Crave The New Top 20%?

Project_Zero_Betas · 2019-04-18T02:25:26+00:00

It would still hold. The bellcurve is always relevant.

MisplacedSanityP · 2019-04-18T04:16:01+00:00

It's all about relativity. If say 80% of the population is suddenly genetically altered to be a model, the old 8/10 will now be a 2-4/10. Lucky for all of us, men in the west aren't trying. They're falling to the radical feminist idealogy and becoming weaker and thereby less attractive. Hard work beats talent unless talent works hard. As a guy who is average-slightly above average looks wise and balding, if everyone lifted as hard as i do, ate as well as i do, and worked as hard to make something of themselves career wise, i'd never get to the top 20%. But the fact that most men are lazy fucks, i'm almost there with a couple years of lifting, making a six figure income, and perpetually having abs.

Morpheus_TNTB · 2019-04-18T03:31:51+00:00

Most men you're age are beer-guzzling fat fucks with neckbeards and severe social anxiety. You can count on the desirability curve to keep on dropping. No matter, women will still always pick the top Male specimen available.

FereallyRed · 2019-04-18T03:47:33+00:00

The bar would just be reset to the new height.

Percentages stay the same.

CainPrice · 2019-04-18T04:25:15+00:00

Two factors are in play.

What's the best a woman can get?
What's her safety net if she has nobody?

If a woman has her pick of men and can pay rent, buy groceries, and live comfortably on her own, she's going to fuck the best men she can get until she's sick of working. If it's been a month since her last hook-up, maybe she'll fuck the second-best men.

If she lived in a magical world where she starves to death or gets eaten by lions or murdered by thugs without a man, she'll take the first loser who wants her just to avoid that fate.

Today, women have jobs and war barely exists. Life is comfortable. Women don't need men to pay rent or buy groceries or protect them from predators or invaders. Meanwhile, birth control is reliable, cheap, and plentiful. And guys are thirsty. A hot guy will fuck an average girl if she's throwing it at him, and she'll enjoy the heck out of it.

A woman doesn't need to fuck a loser. We don't live in the stone ages any more where women need to have a man, any man, just to exist. It's time to stop with all of this academic theory about what if this or that and hit the gym, dress better, and practice your social skills.

Cholo4Trump · 2019-04-18T07:12:38+00:00

This is literally mental masturbation

Just1515 · 2019-04-18T10:32:42+00:00

Women like the top 20% but they will settle with the highest value male she thinks she can find.

[deleted] · 2019-04-18T11:15:34+00:00

It would still hold true, but the standards would rise. Look at how Luke Hemsworth is forgotten compared to Liam or Chris Hemsworth. If everyone just magically became Chads, then Chad would be average and GigaChad would be Chad instead.

addwater · 2019-04-18T16:53:50+00:00

It's a tough question. I don't think anyone could actually predict this.

bigboxguy · 2019-04-19T09:57:24+00:00

They’d still crave the top 20%

Title	If The Top 20% Became Average, Would Women Find More Men Desirable or Would They Still Only Crave The New Top 20%?
Author	Scuzzin
Upvotes	10
Comments	15
Date	April 18, 2019 2:20 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/beg9g4/if_the_top_20_became_average_would_women_find/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/if-the-top-20-became-average-would-women-find-more.235557 https://theredarchive.com/post/235557

Comments