~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
”There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper.”
-Camille Paglia
Of course females can paint, and do art, it is just that almost all of the great innovating artists have been male. There is not that many obsessive females who work 80 hours a week and are extremely driven.
[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Hasn't it been theorized though that Mozart's sister was equally a music prodigy, but was not given the resources because of the times?
[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It is not a matter of talent in a lot of cases, it is a matter of an insane obsessive drive.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I think it's less about obsession and more about the freedom to follow that obsession.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
women have been free to follow their obsessiosn for 100 yrs now and femal emastery has yet to surface
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sure about that, mate?
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
yes?
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Look at the Bach family, they were all music teachers and composers, and the women in the family were given education just like the men by their mothers and fathers. It's a testatement to how equal education leads to men being more talented.
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Artemisia Gentileschi, Mary Cassat, Berthe Morisot, Frida Kahlo, Georgia O'Keefe, Grandma Moses, Helen Frankenthaler, Yayoi Kusama, Joan Mitchell.
You can't convince me women don't make great art. Art for Arts sake, it doesn't matter if it's good or not, trust yourself and explore your personal Art journey no matter what medium you want to express it in. Try painting when you're depressed sometime and put your dark thoughts on the canvas with dark colors.
[–]drok007Not white enough to be blue pill2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Art is subjective, RP stemnerds don't even like art that much.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It seems women suck at everything, and I can't find any evidence to the contrary.
women are adequate, capable and competent at almost anything, the league of Mastery almost always belongs to men. for example, in NASPA Scrabble the middle tier of excellent players is loaded with women, but the top 20 champions? all men (i think one woman has snuck in there at any given time)
the obsession and focus required for mastery seems to just be a male trait
[–]ebonifragaria 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
To a perfectionist like me, that's a death sentence. Adequate is unacceptable.
Do you think the disparity in Scrabble champions could be due to women's lack of competitiveness? I'm sure that's part of why women don't excel in any field. But is it more a lack of capability or a lack of drive? If it's the former, I have no reason to strive. If it's the latter, then I should get determined.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
its also true capabilities. i played tourney scrabble. i dutifully memorized bingo STEMS and word lists, watched NSA champs play, played religiously. a 16 year old ringer supergenius boy massacred me at my first tourney so vigorously that i went outside and cried. whatever i had, he had 100X.
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So essentially you are your own worst enemy in all this. Dude, get some counselling and learn to re-frame. Seriously.
You're not wrong... I have had a lot of counseling, but it hasn't helped much. Well, I guess it could be I'd be much worse off without it.
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bottom line art is your passion why would you deny yourself a source of joy?
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don't understand. If art is your passion doesn't that mean you are compelled to do it? Why would you give up on a passion? I know lots of people who continued to derive joy and fulfillment from from music or acting who do not necessarily make a living at it full time but still perform and get something out of it. Just because you might not necessarily get an exhibit at MoMa doesn't mean you should just abandon everything.
I have a friend who is a CNC operator by trade, she makes iron garden sculpture after getting into welding and she makes a bit of money and really enjoys doing it. She is also a decent photographer who has had some exhibits.
I also have a hard time connecting with your mind set to be honest. Worst case scenario you are a mediocre artist, so, do you enjoy the process, keep doing it.
[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'd actually argue women can create pretty great art. Don't be so down on yourself, it seems like you've got a good head on your shoulders. If you can see right through the turbo-gynocentric "GRRRL POWAH" narrative, then you're clearly able to be observant and skeptical.
Be that way with your art, be earnestly critiquing yourself and striving to improve, on those areas you critiqued. Maybe even write down your critiques, so you can tackle them one by one. I know some pretty damn talented female artists, and across the spectrum - photographers, drawers, painters, sculptors, and performers.
Most people won't be a Michelangelo. Doesn't stop them from trying and doing and creating something really special, that people connect with. Art is really nice because it's so cheap to get into, money-wise - it's just a hell of time sink to get good.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think we need to reframe this conversation.
Many women who have achieved greatness did it in spite of the fact that they were shoved in a box. They had to either rebel against society's expectations of them (like Frida Kahlo) or they had to shrink their artistic drives into something that could fit around them (Jane Austen).
There's an essay by Virginia Woolfe, called "A Room Of One's Own," wherein she describes the requirements for creating art. They're very basic - "A woman must have money and a room of her own in order to [create art]" - but they were also overwhelmingly more likely to be unmet in historical times. I'd go so far as to say that before the advent of birth control, women were also often forced to sacrifice their time and artistic pursuits to raise their children, making it even harder for women to produce art.
Sure, there are some extraordinary exceptions. Frida Kahlo married a wealthy man and was rendered infertile in part by a bus accident that shoved a metal rod through her pelvis. Georgia O'Keefe was widely rumored to be a lesbian and also had no children. Virginia Woolf didn't have children either. Artemisia Gentileschi (a) isn't that well known because people of her time liked to attribute her work to that of her famous father, Orazio Gentileschi, (b) enjoyed the favor of numerous wealthy patrons throughout her career, (c) married a supportive, liberal-for-his-time man, and (d) only had one child, who also became a painter. Jane Austen never married. Neither did Emily Dickinson, who was agoraphobic. Neither did the Bronte sisters, who all died young.
Mary Shelley didn't have kids. Joan Mitchell didn't have kids. Helen Frankenthaler was encouraged to pursue her artistic talents by her family, didn't have kids, and had the freedom to divorce her spouses.
Plenty of women got married, had kids, and produced art; it's just, they had a lot of other stuff to juggle around and understandably didn't have the time to put brush to canvas, if you know what I mean. Most women who became influential artists had to gain societal and financial freedom in ways that would have seemed scandalous at the time.
Times have changed. Women are expected to work, go to school, get an education, and become productive members of society. They're encouraged to pursue their passions in ways that would have been unheard-of 40 years ago. So, who are you harming by pursuing your dreams? Is it truly arrogant to believe you have something to offer?
Also, therapy would probably be helpful.
[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Attention!
You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!
Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
This is very "poor me" if incel artist man was posting this he would get consumed by vampire bears for this.
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
100% true, refreshing for me to talk about Art instead of N count for the millionth time. Just this once though....
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I like Walton Ford.
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
That's good stuff Goat.
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I like animals, I like the Audubon style and his twisted take. Not gonna own anything of his unless I rob a bank of course.
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Louise Agassiz Fuertes, still affordable. Find an orbiter to buy you one. sly grin
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Cool. I had a look since I was not familiar with him. Thanks. You are clearly an art guy, not a deep well of knowledge for me.
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Art balances my day job in finance, if I had enough $$ I would just travel the world museum to museum.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This thread topic is really fucking stupid.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer5 points6 points7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]drok007Not white enough to be blue pill2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ebonifragaria 1 points1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ebonifragaria 1 points1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link