I believe that the mods r/marriedredpill is dogmatic and authoritarian (the mods of r/theredpill and r/asktrp are more tolerant of debate). I was banned for having opinions which the moderators believed weren't "red pill enough." Instead of debating me and proving why my ideas wouldn't improve a marriage and make both the husband and wife both happy, the mods just banned me.

  • I believe that r/marriedredpill mods are authoritarian because they will not debate with anyone who disagrees with them. They will not explain why anyone is wrong. They simply ban anyone who disagrees with them. For the record, if my ideas are wrong, I would like to know why. I am open to changing my mind; just show me why my ideas don't work.

  • I believe that r/marriedredpill mods are dogmatic because they will not try to prove why my specific ideas and advice wouldn't improve a poster's marriage and make him and his wife happier. They just say "your advice isn't red pill enough," and then they ban me.

I am especially interested in hearing from UEMcGill since he mentioned me in this thread:

http://np.reddit.com/r/marriedredpill/comments/35y1f5/why_college_is_not_a_democracy/

But I am unable to respond to his comments there because I am banned. So, I will reply to his comments here:

I went to school for 4 years of undergraduate and then on to my MBA. Never once, in any of my engineering classes did we talk about what would happen if the 2nd law of thermodynamics was wrong. We never discussed what would happen if water and alcohol had the same vapor pressure. We never discussed if the swallow was African or European. Because when your sitting in class and the text book is open, it's assumed that the information being delivered by the professors is tested, tried and true.

The advice on r/marriedredpill has not been proven to have the same level of accuracy as the laws of thermodynamics. Also, since the mods of r/marriedredpill are claiming to be "professors" of Married Red Pill Theory, I would like to ask what are their qualifications? Do they have any formal training in social science (counseling or psychology)? As far as I can tell, none of them are experts in social science, and their opinion is not necessarily any more reliable than mine.

You haven't earned the right to stand up and challenge the professor.

This is a false example. Many classes in college do allow discussion. Besides, even if discussion is unavailable during the class, you can ask the professor privately to discuss the material during a private meeting. I have never met one professor who refused to explain why the material in the textbook is correct.

I am more than willing to discuss my ideas with the mods using private message instead of posting on the main r/marriedrepill subreddit. However, the mods are not willing to answer my questions and debate with me even in a private message.

No, my friend you got banned because you were the kid that was a high-school student last week and walked in the your first college class and started calling out the professor.

I've never heard of a student getting kicked out of a class for asking questions. If a student is asking too many questions, the professor might ask the student to come to the professor's office and discuss the questions privately (since class time is limited), but banning students from class doesn't happen. I don't know what country you're from, but this doesn't happen in America.

Me personally, I love debate.

Good. Here is your chance. Debate me here in this thread.

it's not a democracy for a reason.

That's a good point. In a democracy, there is accountability.

Anyways, you claim to be an expert at relationships and marriage, prove it. Debate me.

You are welcome to read through my comment history to see some of my ideas regarding relationships. If you want to ask me any more questions, feel free to ask.

Specifically, one of the main questions I have for you is simply this:

Prove that your advice works and that my advice doesn't work.