Most MRA arguments lament examples of women getting away with things (pussy-pass) or obtaining a societal advantage through direct preferential treatment and/or through subordinating men. Some of those discussions making their way into this forum even call out how lubricious it would be to substitute “Jew” or “Black” for the word “Woman” in statements coming from feminists. These statement substitutions and their hypocrisy resonate with RP-aware men and women.

One of the hardest lessons I learned in the business world is that it isn’t enough to be right. You can know you are right beyond the shadow of a doubt and it will still mean jack shit if people in the company with the power to act on your opinions don’t agree, know, or care. How to make a case for a point of view, the “soft skills” necessary to convince others, recognizing and overcoming objections are all critically important to leading change. Perception is reality; therefore mis-perception of truth is STILL TRUTH in the eyes of those holding that perception. We talk about this in nearly every post; in the eyes of the AFC/feminist/SJW, Red-pillers are WRONG and they are RIGHT.

With that in mind, what do we do to spread real truth properly? How do we expose the scourge of female primacy and misandry? Machiavelli said “The tyrant will always first appear as the protector”; and this is a lesson that Marxist feminism learned well. Well from my vantage point they are winning hearts and minds by cloaking their cause in the crisis of propaganda euphemisms such as “Social Justice”, “equality”, and “cycle of violence”.

A refined strategy for black knighting

My recommendation is to double-down on language the plebs can consume. Elevator-pitch statements inverting the talking points and using the ‘protector’ propaganda against them. Some examples:

  • “I’m a Feminist” … “Oh, so you are a Female Supremacist?”
  • “I believe in gender equality” … “I believe in equal rights for all; males and females”
  • “We need to stop the War on Women” … “You mean like the oppression the Nazi’s claimed Jews were perpetrating on Germans?”
  • “We live in a Rape Culture” … “I agree! Divorce Rape is a serious problem we need to solve”
  • “Toxic Masculinity” is a problem” … “Toxic feminism is a problem”

By inverting their statements with easy-to-swallow snippets we can expose cracks in the façade of totalitarian feminism.

UPDATE The comments do a better job of conveying what I meant to say. This is less about engaging the militant feminist; it is more about building a language which is thought provoking for the average person who was trained to our feminine primacy culture.