714,030 posts

A woman's goal

Reddit View
November 2, 2019
10 upvotes

Just scratching the surface of this community but wanted to throw something out there for discussion.

So I've been scratching my head about something. It seems like the goal of women in a relationship is to get her guy to commit, which is totally understandable. What I don't understand is if that's the case, why does she resort to desexualizing the relationship when it would be much easier to just give in to a man's needs and provide a constant stream of sex?

Here are my thoughts: From the very moment a woman decides she wants a man to commit, it's her goal to desexualize him to make him worthless on the sexual marketplace. This relieves competition anxiety and ensures that the man forgets how much value he has to other women. If she keeps him low confidence and he gives into her, then she can worry less about him getting picked off by another woman. What they don't realize in doing this, is that they're taking away the very essence of what makes a man attractive, and it eventually ends up backfiring. But then, a woman can put up with a lot to have a sense of security, as can a man.


Post Information
Title A woman's goal
Author readypillred
Upvotes 10
Comments 16
Date 02 November 2019 11:10 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit askMRP
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/296115
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/askMRP/comments/dqs45x/a_womans_goal/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
Comments

[–]tom-anonymous13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

She doesn't want to desexualize him. The truth of the matter is she wants a strong and dominant alpha who is marriage material. But since she can't find that, she settles for Beta-Billy who's just good enough.

Over the years Beta-Billy becomes more of a pussy. He gets a fat gut and he starts sitting in the passenger seat in the car while she drives when the family goes out to dinner. And when the wife asks him where he wants to go he replies "I don't know, where do you want to go?"

Meanwhile the thought of sex with Beta-Billy becomes less desirable because he's less and less of a man every day. Then one day either an Alpha or another Beta with more Alpha qualities than Beta-Billy gets her all excited and she remembers what it's like to be with a real man.

Saying women desexualize men is like saying men desexualize women when they get so fat and unattractive to the point you wouldn't even consider fucking them. Imagine that woman you married 20 years ago became fat and masculine as the years passed. You wouldn't want to have sex with her would you? This is what happens to many men today in long term marriages. They become little girly pussies who allow their wives to treat them like a bitch, and then they wonder why they don't respect them enough to have sex with them.

[–]EasyDaysHardNights1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

From a biological perspective a female only needs her mate around long enough to take care of a young child. Once the child is basically self sufficient a female will want to have sex with other males to give her genes a better chance by being spread across more than one mate. The Betafication process serves two purposes. 1) Control the provision for her and her young offspring until the offspring is self sufficient and 2) kill her attraction to the mate and his ability to resist her movements so she can move on.

[–]The_LitzRed Beret1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not that discussing this will in any way improve your sexual strategy, I will take the bait.

Instead of trying to figure out why she desexualises her husband, figure out the concept of marriage. How and why it came about. Sexual desire in a marriage is a nice to have, not a need to have.

Humans use a very simplistic operating system.

[–]SBIIIRed Fucking Commando1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Mind

Blown

[–]RicoDunne0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Did she de-sexualize the relationship or is she following her captain's lead? If you treat her as a "friend", then don't be surprised to be friend-zoned.

The man keeps the relationship sexual... yes she will be happy that you did it.

[–]aherrns0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

it's her goal to desexualize him to make him worthless on the sexual marketplace

Great that my dick doesn't know about that.

[–]tap09885340 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think this is cultural. Traditionally, marriage included more physical dominance and forced sex, and the male had absolute legal and economic power. Women crave submission to the dominance of a powerful man. When they don't get it, they feel married to their grandma, and so they push him. Hoping he'll man up.

[–]red-sfpplusHard Core Red-1 points0 points  (8 children) | Copy

Her goal is to land me.

For as long as possible.

[–]RedPillGlasses2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

Worked for FitGirl.

You really shouldn’t have gotten into a relationship so quickly post divorce. Give that shit like three years to simmer.

[–]red-sfpplusHard Core Red-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy

Fitchick.

And yeah. So?

Worked for Mandy as well. She got dropped eventually. Fitchick might one day if she fucks up to.

They can all be dropped. There are 100’s in line behind them.

[–]RedPillGlasses2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

And yeah. So?

You haven’t learned to live life without the safety net of being in a relationship.

[–]RedPillGlasses1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

Fitchick.

The fact that you even corrected me on this girl’s made-up name is concerning.

You do you, but post-divorce guys jump into relationships FAR too quickly, and you’re headed down the same path.

[–]lololasaurus1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Been there, done that, got the T-shirt, no idea about the fella you're responding to as I don't follow his story, but this is so damn true in general.

Learning how to be emotionally self sufficient is worth it.

[–]red-sfpplusHard Core Red-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

Fuck off. No one needs your moralizing.

Most of all me.

[–]RedPillGlasses0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

That’s not moralizing dumb ass. Google the term if you don’t understand it.

[–]red-sfpplusHard Core Red-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

You are correct.

Concern trolling was what I was trying to say.

In either case.

Fuck off.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter