~ archived since 2018 ~

in reality they make vaginas drier than the desert

mgtow_memer

November 25, 2020

139 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	in reality they make vaginas drier than the desert
Author	mgtow_memer
Upvotes	139
Comments	26
Date	November 25, 2020 6:00 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/k0x6c7/in_reality_they_make_vaginas_drier_than_the_desert/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/in-reality-they-make-vaginas-drier-than-the-desert.331122 https://theredarchive.com/post/331122

Comments

[–]AncientMGTOWWISDOM18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]badgerking889 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]EternalLoser75 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+]TheMnassri-8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Legs2big8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Legs2big2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]TheMnassri11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mariof1355 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Legs2big4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Salt-Region72831 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cursedwithknowing2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Salt-Region72831 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Chad_Thunderfist1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mypoopsocks0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pilllogical0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]PollutionRealistic10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DisPlaceSucks-1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Glass_Trifle2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[+]DisPlaceSucks-10 points-9 points-8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Glass_Trifle2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The difference from what I’ve seen is that usually person 1 is like “Woman bad”

Which means person 2 is a willfully ignorant retard who did not pay attention to the argument or the context of the argument. Person 2 was simply looking for something to be offended of, and he/she/it(too many genders, whew) is so infested with the indoctrination of the latest "trendy" group agendas/ideologies/cults that he/she/it did not stop for a moment to think and just went ahead for the first "ist" word that came to his/her mind : which is sexist.

then person 2 says “That’s sexist” (which it is)

And how did person 2 figure out the "which it is" part? Because thats what he wanted, no matter what person 1 originally wanted to say. Why? To add fuel to a further completely retarded emotion fueled argument of "he(person 1) is a sexist, misogist and everything that consists ist".

Why so? Because person 2 did not have any logical argument to respond to person 1's original point, which is not even related to any kind of sexism or whatever ism it was called by person 2.

There is actually an interesting and amusing conclusion of this situation :

That person 1 was not actually saying "women bad". Its the retard person 2's misinterpretation of what person 1 said, as person 2 is infested with his regular dose of indoctrination. What person 1 was saying, is that a specific behavior of women or a specific part of a woman's nature is/can be harmful for men, and men who are reading his post need to be cautious about that specific thing if/when they encounter.

But since person 1's post is posted in a subreddit that is apparently "explained" by great PhD holders and "researchers"(gender studies/feminist studies graduates, and those who think education=knowledge and wisdom) like "this sub is misonistic, women hating garbage that plans on actively harming/enslaving/molesting/raping/hating women by making plans in smoke filled rooms on which woman to harm/enslave next"(assuming we actually have the time for that, which is also funny), obviously person 1's post will be seen as "women bad" because person 2 learned to do exactly that from his latest trendy ism or ist or obe, whatever he/she is following. Person 2 knows that it's easy to simply mark a post as "woman bad" & brag about it on other subs for karma farming by showing "look, how hateful mgtow is. I am a man and I am not like these people. I swear I respecc wamen, I really do". It's easy to play that nonsense instead of using common sense, as common sense is very rare nowadays, which is not surprising.