In its ruling Thursday, the Arizona Supreme Court pointed to the contract and the condition that said the embryos "cannot be used to produce pregnancy against the wishes of the partner."

deadBeefCafe2014 · 2020-01-27T13:13:20+00:00

"So that just goes to show you even attorneys can't agree on what this particular contract provided," Murray said.

No. They guy had an attorney who could both read and understand English.

CommanderOfTheDeath · 2020-01-27T14:50:53+00:00

[deleted]

Oatmeal_or_Porridge · 2020-01-27T13:20:48+00:00

Example of media twisting the story to say what their political leanings want it to say.

Another title could be: An human cannot be forced to have children against their will, rules Supreme Court

oceansarevast · 2020-01-27T16:17:21+00:00

This story is even more crazier when you read all the facts. Not only has this man go to court to prevent his ex wife from using it, he has absolutely no defense against the government taking the embryos and giving them to other couples to use. What kind of default law is that...win a battle, lose the war, no defense possible. Kids are not your kids but property of the state. And we all know who owns the state. Don't be fooled by that fact this woman loses too, the proxy matriarchy will give them to another woman. The desires of many women outweigh the desire of the single woman.

RedMeatTrinket · 2020-01-27T15:37:16+00:00

Bad spin from CNN but a win for men's rights.

Zachjsrf · 2020-01-27T16:16:32+00:00

Saw this on another news site. Was heartened to know that the court is upholding the contract and ruling against her. Keep in mind women can and do do this all the time without the consent of men i.e. baby trapping etc. Don't let a 30 second nut ruin 18 years of your life.

Atton_Risk · 2020-01-27T16:58:42+00:00

This was quite a surprise

Comments