Aristotle on inequality

Mortocrates · 2019-09-12T10:44:39+00:00

Well, Down Under, one of the universities has recently lowered the entry scores needed for women to enter bachelor degrees in engineering.

They are lowering the required standard for women, so that more women can be in the course. Therefore women can be of a lower intellect and/or academic potential but still gain entry into engineering degrees. Men have to work harder to get into these degrees than women......but this is considered 'equality'. God help our future bridges and skyscrapers.

This logic is dangerous and I hope it is not the start of something bad, that would see the rise of Marxism.

BalancingVices · 2019-09-12T12:04:29+00:00

Equal opportunity and equal rights will always lead to unequal outcomes on the social-economic ladder.

Suppose all trade was fair, nobody could be coerced into anything and everyone started equally poor, then the only way to get ahead, is to produce more things that are more needed or desired.

Most men will then outperform women, because men can produce more. Strong men will outperform weak and stupid men. Smart men able men will outperform stupid men. This would also be fair and just, because no man or woman gave the winners anything on balance.

Unequal opportunity and unequal rights will also lead to unequal outcomes. The productive members will get shafted, because you can only take surpluses from producers. The surplus can then either go the top, or to the bottom and the top.

Zombocom1911 · 2019-09-12T14:38:57+00:00

funniest part is, they don't even want equal anymore, they want female chauvinism (superiority complex). Notice how it all completely goes to shit when anyone mentions front line combat duties being shared equally.

deathtocontrollers · 2019-09-12T13:41:29+00:00

Aristotle is one of the greatest philosophers in human history. He helped educate Alexander The Great. Everything he says that isn't archaic is the undisputed truth. Anyone who ignores his words is a fool without a doubt.

zpaladin · 2019-09-12T16:23:05+00:00

His teacher, Plato, thought the same. This is why they feared democracy, the rule of the many. Democracy is based on the idea that we are all equal, equal in vote, equal in virtue, excellence, intelligence, etc This is obviously false. But democracy keeps on doubling down. Women vote. But what about under 21? And animals? Felons? Democracy inevitably seeks to increase the franchise The most logical, experienced person gets the same vote as the most irrational. Elders are not respected for their experience. Finally, democracy could become mob rul, we see this clearly on Twitter. Truth doesn’t matter, only numbers because in a democracy, numbers are power.

CuntMonteCristo · 2019-09-12T08:21:47+00:00

Nice one!

venomok · 2019-09-12T16:55:21+00:00

Women have plenty of strengths that men don't possess. Nobody is really unequal, just different.

kevinpeter97 · 2019-09-12T17:18:08+00:00

Osho veiws on equality

The liberation movement is not really in favor of woman’s future, it is against it. It is a reactionary movement. They are asking for equality with men. Why equality? Woman is woman, man is man; they are unique beings. They are not equal, they are not unequal either; they are simply different They are opposite polarities Asking for equality, they are doing all kinds of idiotic things. Because man smokes, liberation women are smoking. Do you think this is intelligence? Man is doing something foolish, but to be equal, you have to do that foolish thing. Soon the women’s liberation will tell women to piss standing Equality? This is sheer nonsense I don’t see that there is any problem. Women should behave like women, according to their nature. A woman smoking looks as if something has gone wrong. And please, at least don’t start pissing standing. Equality does not mean that you have to do everything that man is doing

Inoit · 2019-09-12T13:10:28+00:00

Question for the crowd. Two scenarios: (1) black slaves picked the cotton for Master on the plantation, making him rich and getting nothing for themselves.

(2) Forward 150 yrs later, some poorer blacks on food stamps are chided for not picking themselves up by their bootstraps. Are “parasites”.

Which is the parasite? The dozens of blacks who slaved for Master? Or the Master?

In a court of law, who would have a stronger argument of being a parasite on the whole? The Master who robbed dozens on his plantation of their lives to serve him? Or the blacks who get assistance for food stamps to make ends meet?

Would you in any circumstance be ok with going back in time and slaving for the Master?

Title	Aristotle on inequality
Author	gilfrist
Upvotes	407
Comments	22
Date	September 12, 2019 7:58 AM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/d34nsc/aristotle_on_inequality/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/aristotle-on-inequality.401693 https://theredarchive.com/post/401693

Comments