Introduction:

It doesn't matter if the chick you want to bang is already in your own home. If she is not attracted to you, then it's not going to happen. Attraction cannot be negotiated, but logistics can. For this reason it is always more important to ensure adequate attraction before screening for logistics.

This post explores different kinds of attraction and the role of logistics, under the premise that the former is more important than the latter when closing. It also explains why this is the case.

Body:

When a woman is strongly attracted to a man, she will invite him to have sex with her. However, a woman will not ever invite a man for sex purely because of good logistics. Attraction is the necessary condition for unforced sex to occur. Logistics are secondary to attraction because sex cannot occur based on logistics alone.

Attraction

Attraction is the fusion of polarized, masculine (dominant) and feminine (submissive) sexual energies. Attraction between a man and a woman will always be strongest when there is the least amount of confusion about who fills what role. It's important to acknowledge that each role experiences attraction differently:

The dominant role focuses on demonstrating value, competence, and strength. It emphasizes boldness, social standing, bravado, assertiveness, and grit. The dominant is man. Man's attraction is expressed through love, attention, and commitment.

The submissive role focuses on ensuring the dominant's pleasure. It emphasizes sensitivity, passivity, obedience, and admiration. The submissive is woman. Woman's attraction is expressed through respect, subjugation, and sexual appeasement.

Attraction cannot be negotiated because masculinity and femininity cannot be negotiated. Someone either exhibits these characteristics or they do not. Once attraction is lost, it can be regained slowly. However, it is not easy and usually requires drastic measures such as intense dread/monk mode. It is easier to walk away and find a new mate if attraction dies, and this is why LTR's can be difficult to maintain, because they depend on attraction remaining high despite familiarity, but that's an entirely different topic altogether.

The key thing to remember is this:

Solid game will spark attraction, and solid frame/leadership will maintain it.

Logistics

Logistics is point A to point B. It is the flow from an original location (club, mall, festival, etc.) to the terminal location where sex occurs (apartment, car, porta-potty, etc.). The best logistics are convenient, abundant, flexible, and incorporate plausible deniability. Poor logistics on the other hand are arduous, limited, boring, and strongly trigger anti-slut mechanisms.

[edit]

/u/Swoledinger made an interesting point about how favorable logistics can amplify attraction.

It is true that having good logistics in itself is not Beta Bux, and that logistics should not be outright ignored even if attraction is very high. However, there is a fine line between leveraging abundance/status to build on already existing attraction (social proof, Alpha Bux) and advertising logistics to spark initial attraction (desperation, Beta Bux).

High-status Red Pill men/Chads often have the advantage of being attractive and having good logistics, something we should all strive for, but at the end of the day, logistics is just the transition from point of contact to point of sex. Attraction is the necessary first requirement.

[/edit]

Logistics, unlike attraction, are negotiable. A woman will be blind to poor logistics if she is attracted enough. She will not give a shit how dirty the club bathroom is because she only cares about fulfilling her role as the submissive. Everything the polar dominant does fascinates the polar submissive, including deciding on the logistics. This is because she is excited by his presence and decisiveness.

Poor logistics have obvious pitfalls to consider. Attraction must be very strong for them to work, yet there is no clearly defined "attraction threshold" at which point a woman will agree to sex under poor logistical terms. It should not be one's imperative to bang women in the nastiest conditions possible, but rather to build enough attraction so that nasty logistics are viable if necessary.

There is also a legality to consider with some locations -- the risk might not be worth it every time.

Good logistics will always be preferable to poor logistics because they are convenient and give her plausible deniability, but an attractive male with poor logistics will be chosen over an unattractive male with good logistics almost every time. This is because women are hypergamous.

However, if a woman is equally attracted to two men, she will choose the one with better logistics.

She would rather give head to Chad behind a dumpster than be Billy Beta's little spoon.

What must be avoided at all costs is no logistics. There is a difference between banging a chick in the bathroom stall or the middle of an open field and having zero logistical options at all. If there are no logistics, then sex will not happen, even if attraction is high. If one ever finds their self in this situation they should immediately either a) find acceptable logistics or b) get away from the woman before attraction dies and reschedule when logistics are better.

The good news is that logistics are negotiable, so there should rarely be a problem finding a place to bang. If someone's excuse for not getting laid despite having high attraction/SMV is "no logistics," then they are likely hamstering to account for a flaw in their game, frame, or overall capacity to assume the dominant role.

A dominant man will bang a chick almost anywhere because he does not give a fuck.

Conclusion:

Building and maintaining attraction should be the primary objective when pulling.

Men want women that are submissive and sexually pleasing, women want men that are dominant and attentive.

Logistics are negotiable and virtually irrelevant if attraction is strong enough.

Attraction, logistics, abundance, frame, and game are all entirely different, but co-influential, concepts.

Abundant, dominant men can attract better women and secure better logistics.

Get her horny enough and she will fuck anywhere, but don't be an idiot about it.

Thanks,

bruh my jays