I propose a new term – MWALT (most women are like that)

Crazyclockwork · 2019-09-17T17:19:43+00:00

Logic dictates there must be a few unicorns out there.

Experience dictates otherwise.

AWALT is infallible.

altburger69 · 2019-09-17T17:22:48+00:00

All creatures have instincts, but not every individual acts on them.

all women are LIKE that.

deadBeefCafe2014 · 2019-09-17T17:41:28+00:00

AWALT always applies.

There a lot of facets to female nature. I’ll use my own mother as example. And I love this woman.

She has been fiercely loyal to my dad for the nearly 50 years they have been married. My dear GOD can this woman nag like its an Olympic sport.

So in terms of whoredom, mom’s not like that. But occasional nagging bitch? AWALT.

Krazyrobus · 2019-09-17T17:24:55+00:00

The term is fair, though why bother debating simps and white knights. Such a waste of energy.

BaffyBob · 2019-09-17T17:49:47+00:00

No matter what they're like today, they will, eventually, turn into typical women. AWALT and the Wall are absolutes.

omg_ppl_are_stupid · 2019-09-17T17:29:55+00:00

AWALT is used because the fact that yes their are unicorns out there, but they're so few why take the risk? Basically we know not ALL women are like that, but that implies the thinking within peoples minds that "my women isn't like that" which in reality, most likely she is. By using an absolute you make the assumption of personality trait that AWALT first and unicorn second. SOOOOOOOOOOO when you meet a women you're protected and on guard until she shows to be a unicorn, which ALMOST NEVER happens. Does this ramble make sense?

Diogeneplz1 · 2019-09-17T17:53:12+00:00

There's confusion about what AWALT means. AWALT is just women's nature in that they are hypergamous, have massive ingroup bias for women, are emotionally minded over rationallly minded and prefer this as it gets them want they want or need, prefer security to liberty, orient themselves to whatever at large society directs them towards, etc. Not every woman is going to be a complete divorce raping harpy, but today's society encourages and incentivizes the worst of women's natures at the expense of men. Being more hedonistic creatures, hypergamous, their love being conditional, emotionally capricious, and wanting to be accepted and praised by mainstream society makes them incredibly dangerous to marry as a man.

You can marry a virgin who gives you 20 years of the traditional marriage, but she'll still lose her love for you, her sexual attraction to you, will use sex to maninulate you, and will project or displace all her frustrations on you (nagging). She may end up divorce raping you, but it won't be the experience you want it to be no matter what. You can never keep a women's love or sexual attraction to you forever. She may do her wifely duties, but it'll be dispassionate and you'll have to work for it (prostiution). Men used to comfort themselves by popularizing what women told them as the reason they weren't having sex as much, if at all, or why it was less passionate. For example, they'd think (many still do) women aren't as sexual or lost their sexual interest over time, but, in reality, they lost it for their husbands as evident by the fact they'll start putting out immediately after a separation, even if they weren't cheating, regardless of how old they are.

*a unicorn is a woman who remains faithful and will do wifely duties. The happily married thing has always been bullshit. She'll still nag you, manipulate you, lose her love, lose her sexual attraction for you, and make you work for sex.

Anonymoose_wrex · 2019-09-17T18:06:25+00:00

Here is my preferred phrase:

"Enough women are like that."

As in, enough women act like the parasites we talk about on here that I will never bother pursuing or qualifying myself to a woman ever again.

GoodMan_Gone · 2019-09-17T18:28:38+00:00

I get what you're saying, OP. #me too don't believe ALL women are the soul sucking harpies depicted often here. I still believe those succubi are the exceptions to the rule. I see the AWALT in a more broad perspective. Namely seeing female nature as it is. And in itself there's nothing good or bad about that. Same goes for male nature. F.e. aggression/ anger is one of man's drives. It takes anger to bring that mammoth down, to build that house, to build up a thriving company etc. But there are lowlife men who use that anger/ aggression against females/ children etc. But those are a vast minority as well. So I dare say AWALT, but AMALT as readily. In both sexes despicable exceptions to the majority.

Title	I propose a new term – MWALT (most women are like that)
Author	rquasius
Upvotes	0
Comments	15
Date	September 17, 2019 5:17 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/d5k2fu/i_propose_a_new_term_mwalt_most_women_are_like/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/i-propose-a-new-term-mwalt-most-women-are-like.417936 https://theredarchive.com/post/417936

Comments