Conclusion so far I come to.

Women

* Women base their morality and ethics more on: Deontological ethics.
Such as for example: duty, obligation, rule (by eith law or society/herd), rights, expectations.
The reason being, breaking of deontological ethics is accompanied by strong feelings, emotions, and intuitive reactions. And women are more influenced by strong feelings, emotions, and intuitive reactions. Als a reason maybe, that when breaking deontological ethics one experiences often punishment or reprocussions by the group/society; which women fear more of happening.

​

* Women base their morality and ethics more on: Interpersonal accord and conformity.
Such as for examples: Does it care for an individual? Then it's good. Does it harm an individual? Then it's bad.
The reason being, they are more concerned with keeping good relationships/accord/conformity with a person or some persons or with a (small) group. And the people within their own circle/group.

Men

* Men base their morality and ethics more on: Utilitarianism.
Such as for example: which produces the greatest well-being of the greatest number of people?
The reason being, Utilitarianism is based on reasoning. And men don't let factors such as strong feelings, emotions, and intuitive reactions; totally effect their morality and ethics. (which would cause men to become Deontological).

​

* Men base their morality and ethics more on: abstract moral reasoning (beyond the individual (relationships).
Such as for examples: what consequences does it have for the whole if I care for this person (give a person a free pass)?
The reason being, men are less concerned with keeping good relationships/accord/conformity with a person or some persons or with a (small) group. And even the people within their own circle/group. But men are more concerned with providing an equal level playing field and justice for the whole of society/group.

Some extra ponderings that crossed my mind.

The above conclusions. Make it seem that women are overall better not put in a position where they infuence the direction of society to much. Because they seem to lack, seeing things from the whole, broader perspective.

For instance, saying it's better for women not to vote. They often say the moral reason against that idea is: They have the right to vote (Deontological ethic); it makes women feel bad/left out/infeiour (morality based on interpersonal accord and conformity); all are equal (morality based on interpersonal accord and conformit. But rarely, will women bring up points/reasons coming from the perspective of what is best for the well-being of the greatest number of people or society as a whole.
It seems. Men would be more equipped to lead in things that concern the direction of society that need to be based on the broader/whole picture. And Women would be more equipped to lead in things that concern the well-being of the people and keeping a small group together/consenus/conform.

If my lines of thought go wrong? Or opinions are different? Or proof or data is there; that I'm going wrong?
I would love to hear it, so to update my understandings/ideas about this world I live in.

Conclusions caused by the following data/info:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBsT9XTwsn0