Teasing out a little bit of theory.

Most of you are familiar with the idea that women are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of commitment.

It thus follows that men come to the sexual marketplace for sex, and women, for commitment.

A woman, by virtue of being a woman, is always going to have suitors -- because, pussy. Someone's always going to hit on her, unless she's Lena Dunham of course. Or Hillary Clinton.

It is for this simple reason that women can't 'go their own way', inasmuch as they'd like to and proudly proclaim it as a counter reaction to MGTOW.

A man on the other hand can ghost on society. He can create situations where very few women would even want commitment from him - by living frugally / minimally for example. We all know women are more materialistic and less capable of transmuting their base desires in order to achieve self-mastery, than men. They are thus likelier to gravitate toward the BB who flashes his cash (till they realize he's Beta).

Interested to hear your views on this. Am I making sense?