Now, let me get this straight, I'm not talking about unicorn shit or NAWALT or whatever. We all know almost all women go after money and stability as far as relationships go and search for a provider more than anything, but I have encountered few cases with some men, who somehow don't really have much financial advantage over their girlfriends or buy them stuff or even paying the bills at restaurants etc., but these women stay with these men countering their nature.

It kinda boggles my mind, I can't debunk this although there are many theories as to why this is happening. Maybe she thinks he's got potential in the future, or she thinks he is 'alpha' and makes her pussy wet. I don't really know, but it doesn't make any sense for a woman to stay in a relationship where she isn't being provided for or even being 50/50 with the man. I have seen a few cases now of this type of thing and I just can't explain it.

So what is your opinion on this topic guys, if women don't necessarily go after a man's money and kinda support themselves on their own, what is their purpose and goal in the said relationship? Why are they staying in such a relationship, even tho it contradicts what we're talking here and the basic red pill theories.